Skip to content

Editorial governance

Editors & Reviewers

Frontiersin journals are run by active researchers. Our editors and reviewers uphold rigorous, fair and transparent peer review.

Editors-in-Chief

Dr. Priya Raman

Editor-in-Chief · Applied Artificial Intelligence Letters

Centre for Responsible Computing

ML evaluationReproducibility

Dr. Sofia Andersen

Editor-in-Chief · Advanced Materials & Energy

Danish Laboratory for Sustainable Materials

ElectrocatalysisGreen chemistry

Dr. Tomás Okafor

Editor-in-Chief · Computational Neuroscience Review

Institute of Neural Computation

Neural dynamicsTheoretical neuroscience

Prof. Amara Lindqvist

Editor-in-Chief · Molecular Medicine & Therapeutics

Karl Hollis Medical Research Centre

AutoimmunityClinical genomics

Prof. Helena Marsh

Editor-in-Chief · Journal of Climate & Earth Systems

University of Westhaven

Ocean circulationClimate dynamics

Prof. Kai Nakamura

Editor-in-Chief · Marine Ecology & Conservation

Pacific Institute of Marine Science

FisheriesMarine protected areas

Associate & Review Editors

Dr. Claire Dubois

Associate Editor · Molecular Medicine & Therapeutics

Institut de Recherche Biomédicale

VirologyHost–pathogen biology

Dr. Mateo Silva

Review Editor · Marine Ecology & Conservation

Universidad del Litoral

Environmental DNABiodiversity monitoring

Dr. Ngozi Adeyemi

Review Editor · Journal of Climate & Earth Systems

West African Climate Observatory

Monsoon systemsClimate impacts

Dr. Yusuf Demir

Associate Editor · Applied Artificial Intelligence Letters

Bosphorus Technical University

Bayesian MLProbabilistic modelling

For reviewers

Become a reviewer

We currently have 4 board members acting as active reviewers, supported by a wider community of invited experts. If you hold a doctorate and have published in a relevant field, we welcome your interest.

Register interest
  • Transparent review

    Reviewer names are published with accepted articles, recognising their contribution to the scholarly record.

  • Fair timelines

    Reviewers are asked for a report within 14 days, with flexible extensions on request.

  • Structured reports

    A clear review form focuses on rigour, reproducibility and clarity rather than perceived impact.

  • Recognition

    Review activity is certified and can be linked to your ORCID record.