Skip to content

Jiliang Tang

Specialty Chief Editor

Michigan State University

Network Science and Graph Data
Reviewer
Not reviewing

Recently published in their journal

Original Research

Reliability-aware ensemble recommendation for open-network commerce: a dual-metric framework for jointly evaluating ranking accuracy and serving correctness

Rish Praveen S, Vani Rajasekar

Recommendation quality in open-network commerce is conventionally measured through offline ranking metrics that implicitly assume reliable upstream retrieval, stable item identities, and consistent catalog availability. In open networks such as India's Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), these assumptions are routinely violated: catalogs are contributed by heterogeneous, independently operated providers, transactions follow asynchronous Beckn-style protocol lifecycles, and identifiers drift across service boundaries. This paper presents LocalMarket, a reliability-aware recommendation platform (Next.js frontend, FastAPI backend, ensemble ranking layer) that implements ONDC-pattern transaction flows in a controlled, repository-reproducible environment. We propose and validate a dual-metric evaluation framework that decouples model effectiveness—measured through Mean Average Precision (MAP@10), Recall@10 and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG@10)—from serving correctness, measured through a novel Route Resolution Success Rate (RRSR) and Wishlist Consistency Rate (WCR). Using a controlled within-system ablation across Model-only, Reliability-only, and Combined configurations on fixed traffic traces, we utilize a convex-combination ensemble containing neural collaborative filtering (NCF) (utilizing only GMF embeddings for retrieval latency), graph-based, session-aware, and content-based components primarily as a vehicle for testing this framework. While this ensemble configuration improves NDCG@10 by 70.7% over a Popularity-based baseline, our primary finding validates that four targeted reliability interventions raise RRSR from 60.0 to 99.8% and WCR from 0.0 to 100.0%. Critically, the combined configuration preserves both gains simultaneously, indicating that model-level and serving-level improvements are additive rather than substitutive. The results support a systems-level thesis: in open-network commerce recommenders, ranking accuracy and serving correctness are independent, jointly necessary axes of quality, and reporting only one materially overstates the value delivered to end users. We further contribute a reusable integration failure-mode taxonomy, a constrained ensemble-weight selection protocol, and a reproducible experiment-replay procedure intended to generalize to other open-network commerce deployments.

Systematic Review

Big data analytics and sentiment analysis for health misinformation detection: a systematic literature review of influencing factors, implementation challenges and a data-driven adoption framework

Khurram Shahzad, Asfa Muhammed Din Javeed, Shakil Ahmad, Mujahid Latif, Kashaf Saleem

The study aimed to identify the factors influencing big data analytics (BDA) and sentiment analysis (SA) for health misinformation detection and associated challenges for the adoption of BDA and SA across health ecosystems. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was applied for addressing the study's objectives. Thirty most relevant seminal studies (peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings) were retrieved from 11 digital platforms to conduct the SLR. Results of the study showed that advanced deep learning architectures, feature engineering, sentiment intelligence, real-time analytics, and human-centered verification were key factors that influenced big data analytics and sentiment analysis based health misinformation detection. It was also identified that annotation limitations, scalability constraints, domain adaptation challenges, ethical concerns, and sustainability challenges negatively impacted the adoption of big data and sentiment driven health misinformation detection systems. The study has developed a data-driven framework to effectively adopt and sustain big data analytics and sentiment analysis to detect health misinformation. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/wjrm6.

Perspective

Controlled knowledge updating in memory-enabled AI agents: beyond model editing and recall

Gabriel Chavira Juárez, Eder Jahir Gonzalez Bravo, Guadalupe Esmeralda Rivera García, Javier A. Arcos Espinosa, Salvador W. Nava-Díaz

Large language model agents that persist across sessions, tools, users, and changing environments do more than answer isolated prompts; they accumulate state. When new evidence arrives, the central question is where that change should live: transient context, external memory, tool or workflow definitions, activation states, or model parameters. Recent benchmarks compare update mechanisms and assess memory over time, while emerging architectures coordinate multiple memory types. In this Perspective, we examine how a decision layer should select among update substrates and evaluate whether its choices remain appropriate. A controlled update is not merely a successful edit or a recalled fact; it is a decision to alter the least invasive substrate sufficient for the claim's scope, expected persistence, and evidentiary strength, including when the correct action is not to write persistent state. We propose a substrate-aware view of controlled knowledge updating organized by three principles: substrate proportionality, temporal defeasibility, and auditable continuity. This framing treats knowledge updating as a longitudinal control problem and motivates evaluation criteria that include update selection, temporal consistency, interference, reversibility, efficiency, and robustness. The resulting agenda connects memory, knowledge editing, agent evolution, and benchmarking under a single practical question: how should an agent decide what to change so that future behavior improves without accumulating uncontrolled state?