Skip to content

Redefining Progress in Neonatal Care in Low- and-Middle Income Countries: Evidence, Systems, and Ethical Innovation

Neonatal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a cornerstone of global child health, yet progress in reducing neonatal mortality has not matched the momentum of research, advocacy, and policy initiatives. Despite advances in neonatal science and longstanding efforts to address conditions like prematurity, sepsis, hypoxic–ischemic injury, jaundice, and respiratory failure, neonatal deaths in LMICs remain unacceptably high. The field continues to grapple with persistent questions about the effectiveness of interventions, the translation of research into practice, and the accountability of health systems and stakeholders. This gap reflects not only clinical challenges but also deep-rooted social, structural, and environmental determinants of child health. Recent studies show a growing awareness of the roles played by systemic constraints—such as resource limitations, workforce shortages, weak governance, and climate change—on the effectiveness of neonatal care. These constraints intersect with poverty, gender inequities, education, and access to care, shaping survival outcomes from birth. While targeted research and technological innovations have emerged, challenges around implementation, scale-up, and real-world impact persist, pointing to gaps in both infrastructure and incentives. The goal of this Research Topic is to create a critical, jury-style framework that interrogates the full continuum of neonatal care in LMICs. Moving beyond disease-specific silos, the Topic seeks to synthesize and evaluate evidence across clinical, technological, health-system, ethical, and policy domains, with a strong focus on the social contexts in which neonatal care is delivered. We aim to spark candid and constructive debate about why certain advances stall, which incentives drive current priorities, and what reforms are needed to maximize survival and equity for neonates. Key questions include: Where are we failing to translate innovation into improved outcomes? How do misaligned policies and fragmented systems undermine accountability? How do social determinants, community structures, and family-level factors influence neonatal survival and long-term wellbeing? What bold new partnerships, metrics, or ethical approaches should define the next decade of neonatal research and practice in LMICs? This Research Topic welcomes articles that cut across boundaries while maintaining a focus on survival impact and systems-driven critique. The scope includes, but is not limited to, analysis within the following areas: • Thematic debates on accountability and critical analysis of stagnation or failures in neonatal care translation, including social, economic, and structural drivers of inequity. • Systems and constraints, including infrastructure, healthcare workforce, financing, governance, conflict, and environmental pressures, as well as community-level and family-centered determinants of care. • Evidence and innovation in translational science, implementation research, and technological advances addressing key neonatal conditions such as prematurity, sepsis, hypoxia, jaundice, and respiratory support, with attention to equity, accessibility, and cultural appropriateness. • Reform and future directions in research incentives, partnerships, ethics, impact metrics, and innovation pathways, particularly those addressing social justice, inclusion, and health equity. • Cross-disciplinary proposals and neonate-centered approaches for radically improving survival and health outcomes, situated within broader child rights, public health, and population health frameworks. To further insights into the survival and wellbeing of neonates in LMICs, we welcome a wide variety of article types, including original research, systematic and scoping reviews, policy analyses, commentaries, and case studies, that contribute actionable solutions and promote cross-sector dialogue, especially those engaging with social pediatrics, population health, and community-based interventions. Topic editors: Hippolite Onyejiaka AMADI, Stephen Obaro, JOHN KUUMUORI GANLE Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/79574/redefining-progress-in-neonatal-care-in-low--and-middle-income-countries-evidence-systems-and-ethical-innovation

Open for submissionsHosted by Frontiers in Pediatrics
Contribute to this topic

Articles in this collection

No articles published in this topic yet.