Editorial
Frontiers in Batteries and Electrochemistry ·
Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbael.2026.1985379
Editorial: Reviews in batteries and electrochemistry volume II
- Christopher Johnson1*corresponding author
- Jung Ho Kim2
- Yang-Tse Cheng3
- 1Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States
- 2University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- 3University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
Abstract
Keywords
This collection of recent contributions in Frontiers in Batteries and Electrochemistry reflects the field’s rapid expansion from materials discovery and electrode engineering to system-level intelligence and digitalization. Across sodium-, lithium-, and zinc-based chemistries, the featured papers address a common challenge: how to simultaneously improve energy density, safety, durability, manufacturability, and real-world operability. Together, they illustrate the increasingly multidisciplinary nature of battery research, where advances in chemistry, interfaces, processing, solid-state design, and data-centric system management are converging.
A central theme is safer battery design through material and structural innovation. Myeong et al. introduce a fire-extinguishing current collector coated with melamine polyphosphate (MPP) for lithium-ion batteries. Their work demonstrates that integrating a flame-retardant layer directly onto the Al current collector can reduce self-extinguishing time while preserving electrochemical performance when the coating composition is properly optimized. Rather than relying on bulk electrolyte reformulation, this strategy localizes safety functionality at the electrode architecture level. The study is notable for showing that the current collector can act not only as a passive conductor but also as an active safety component. This concept aligns well with growing efforts to design multifunctional battery components that improve abuse tolerance without sacrificing performance.
A complementary safety-focused contribution is provided by Wang et al., who engineer a composite solid-state electrolyte (CSSE) for sodium metal batteries using a PVDF matrix and NASICON-type Na3.7Zr1.45Sc0.4Mg0.15Si2PO12 filler. Their optimized electrolyte establishes multiple ion-transport channels and achieves improved room-temperature ionic conductivity, sodium-ion transference number, and interfacial compatibility. Importantly, the resulting full cells show strong capacity retention and long-term cycling stability. This work highlights how solid-state sodium batteries are maturing through interfacial design rather than conductivity improvements alone. It also underscores sodium’s growing relevance as a lower-cost alternative to lithium in stationary and potentially transport applications.
On the theme of materials discovery for next-generation chemistries, Tham et al. present a high-throughput computational screening framework for zinc-rich cathodes for anode-free aqueous zinc batteries. By down-selecting from more than 1000 candidates using criteria including thermodynamic stability, conductivity, voltage window, aqueous stability, and diffusion kinetics, the authors identify six promising compounds. Their study exemplifies how first-principles databases and structured screening pipelines can accelerate the search for viable electrode materials in emerging chemistries. Beyond identifying candidates such as ZnNi5Zn4MnO5, the work contributes design rules linking composition and performance, which may guide future experimental validation and broader battery materials discovery.
If Tham et al. show the power of computational selection, Khan’s mini-review on sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) provides a broader perspective on why sodium systems continue to attract attention. The review emphasizes sodium abundance, low cost, and relevance for large-scale storage, while also discussing persistent limitations such as the larger Na+ ionic radius, volume change, sluggish kinetics, and unstable solid-electrolyte interphase formation. Though concise, the review captures the key message that sodium-ion batteries remain highly promising but still require coordinated advances in cathodes, anodes, electrolytes, and separators before reaching full commercial maturity.
Processing science is another major thread in this collection. Lee et al. compare dry and wet coating methods for Ni-rich NCM811 cathodes, showing that coating route strongly affects surface degradation and ultimately cell durability. Their results reveal that wet coating, despite being conventional, promotes formation of a NiO-like surface phase through water exposure, which accelerates cation mixing and resistance growth. By contrast, dry coating suppresses this unwanted phase formation and delivers better capacity retention and rate capability. This study is particularly timely because manufacturing methods are becoming just as important as composition in the commercialization of high-Ni cathodes. The work reminds us that performance losses can originate not only from intrinsic material instability but also from process-induced surface chemistry.
At the system level, Madani et al. offer an expansive review of digital twin technologies for battery systems, charting the emergence of virtual battery replicas that integrate physics-based modeling, machine learning, cloud-edge computing, and battery management functions. Their review spans applications in electric vehicles, stationary storage, production, thermal management, state estimation, predictive maintenance, fault diagnosis, and end-of-life handling. It also usefully frames digital twins as multiscale entities—from cell materials to pack and grid systems—and identifies barriers such as standardization, cybersecurity, computational load, and data quality. Among the most important messages of this review is that future battery performance will not be determined by electrochemical materials alone, but also by the intelligence of the digital infrastructure that monitors and controls them throughout their lifecycle.
Taken together, these papers reveal several clear directions for the field.
First, interfaces remain decisive. Whether in Ni-rich layered oxides, sodium metal solid-state cells, or flame-retardant current collectors, interfacial chemistry controls not only capacity fade but also safety and abuse response.
Second, processing matters as much as composition. The dry-vs-wet coating study demonstrates that subtle differences in synthesis route can produce major changes in surface phase evolution and electrochemical behavior. This principle applies broadly across battery manufacturing.
Third, sodium and zinc chemistries are gaining strategic importance. Sodium-ion and sodium metal systems offer resource and cost advantages, while zinc-based systems open pathways toward aqueous and potentially safer batteries. Both areas are benefitting from improved modeling, materials screening, and interface engineering.
Fourth, digitalization is becoming foundational. Digital twins connect electrochemistry with sensing, prediction, and operational control, creating opportunities for smarter charging, improved health estimation, and lifecycle optimization. As battery deployment scales, these system-level tools will be essential.
Overall, this set of articles captures a battery community moving beyond isolated component optimization toward integrated design across materials, processes, architectures, and cyber-physical control. The future of advanced batteries will likely belong to approaches that combine these domains: safer interfaces, scalable manufacturing, chemistry-aware materials discovery, and intelligent management systems. These contributions offer strong examples of that transition and point toward a more holistic and application-ready era in electrochemical energy storage.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Summary of papers and general structure. Some editorial comments were added by the author.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Mohammad Waseem, Jamia Millia Islamia, India
Statements
- Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors CJ, JK and Y-TC declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
- Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
- Author contributions
CJ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JK: Writing – review and editing. Y-TC: Writing – review and editing.
Citation
Johnson, C., et al. (2026). Editorial: Reviews in batteries and electrochemistry volume II. Frontiers in Batteries and Electrochemistry, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
- Received
- Accepted
- Published
- Volume
- 5 - 2026
Copyright
Copyright © 2026 Johnson, Kim and Cheng.
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
*Correspondence: Christopher Johnson
Article metrics
- Views
- 0
- Downloads
- 0
- Citations
- 0
- Shares
- 0
