Skip to content

Review

Frontiers in Bacteriology ·

Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbrio.2026.1746114

Bacterial pigments as sustainable and functional colorants in cosmetic applications: advances and prospects

  • Pritha Chakraborty1
  • Mandheer Kaur2
  • Basheer Thazeem3
  • Jithin Thomas4
  • Hemavathy S5
  • Deepak Sharma6*corresponding author
  1. 1School of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  2. 2Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh College of Technology, Chandigarh Group of Colleges Landran, Mohali, Punjab, India
  3. 3Postgraduate and Research Department of Zoology, Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
  4. 4Department of Biotechnology, Mar Athanasius College, Kothamangalam, Kerala, India
  5. 5Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory (BITE LAB), Department of Community Medicine, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  6. 6Advanced Therapeutics and Sensing Laboratory, Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The bacterial world is a promising source for the production of colored metabolites known as bacterial pigments. Synthetic dyes are responsible for health problems such as allergies, cancer, toxicity, and hyperactivity and for environmental issues such as pollution of waterways, disruption in aquatic ecosystems, inhibition of photosynthesis, and bioaccumulation in food chains. These concerns have provided the microbial world a chance of being used as a source of natural pigment for industrial applications, including cosmetics. Cosmetic products such as lipsticks, nail polishes, hair dyes, soaps, body washes, face washes, creams, and lotions utilize various colored compounds of chemical origin and may pose adverse effects on their unregulated or overuse. Bacterial pigments can be an alternate and sustainable option to replace these chemical moieties in these cosmetic products. Bacteria from diverse habitats with a broad scale of colors such as carotenoids, prodigiosin, melanin, violaceins, quinones, and indigoidines have been reported for their beneficial properties such as color, antioxidant, emulsifying, antiaging, and UV protection. These pigments have multiple shades and also possess nutritional and therapeutic properties. Although most of the information in this field is based on primary research at a laboratory scale and very limited attempts have been made to improve these bacterial strains and processes for enhanced pigment production, it highlights a significant scope for research and innovations in this field. The integration of advanced genetic and metabolic engineering technology such as CRISPR/Cas, along with the utilization of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based methods, can transform this field and boost pigment production. Therefore, the current review article aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview of bacterial pigments with the potential for application in cosmetic products. Moreover, it also highlights the existing challenges and outlines future research directions.

Keywords

1 Introduction

The history of dyeing dates back to the Indus Valley civilization, approximately 2600–1900 BC, showing the interest of humans in color. Before the 19th century, most of the dyes were natural and curated from fruits, plants, and berries using various techniques (Alegbe and Uthman, 2024). In 1850, the first synthetic dye was produced, and almost 80 different synthetic dyes were produced and used in different sectors by the 1900s (Rather et al., 2023). The great industrial revolution had quickly turned the attention toward synthetic dyes due to their cheaper cost and availability with limited understanding of their long-term effect. Although synthetic dyes are known to be carcinogenic and harmful, at present, they are widely used in food, textile, agricultural, and cosmetic products (Cheng et al., 2022). The presence of synthetic dyes in cosmetic products is a well-known fact. Human skin is a very sensitive organ that loses moisture and elasticity over time. Constant exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light and chemicals can result in faster aging of the skin. Thus, skin care is important to maintain its barrier function (Resende et al., 2021). The synthetic dyes present in cosmetic products have many harmful effects such as skin damage and tumor formation. Heavy metals such as chromium and cadmium are found in cosmetic products like lipsticks, eye shadow, eyeliner, and blush, which can lead to skin allergies, blindness, and even death (Cheng et al., 2022). These carcinogenic compounds are absorbed by the skin and act as neurotoxins, endocrine disruptors, and mutagens, affecting reproductive and overall human health. According to Wijesekara and Xu (2024), several synthetic colorants approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were found to be carcinogenic. Furthermore, in addition to skin contact, humans are also exposed to synthetic dyes through contaminated water and the food chain. These dyes trigger allergies, asthma, dermatitis, central nervous system disorders, organ dysfunction, and cancer risks. The bioaccumulation of these dyes in fish fatty tissues poses zoonotic threats (Sudarshan et al., 2023). Environmental contamination from these dyes is caused by the discharge of wastewater from various industries, including the textile and cosmetic industries. In the aquatic system, these dyes exhibit carcinogenic and mutagenic properties along with high biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand (Srivastava et al., 2022). These dyes also reduce light penetration in waterways, thus inhibiting microalgae photosynthesis, causing growth inhibition, ecosystem collapse, and toxicity to fish (Krishna Moorthy et al., 2021).

Natural pigments are usually not harmful but are more expensive than the synthetic ones. Lately, there is a growing concern among consumers of skin care products regarding the safety and increasing demand for natural pigments, which are not harmful to the skin (Mary et al., 2024). The advantage of natural pigments is their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, which boost their demand in the market. The market demand for natural pigments has grown to nearly 2.5 billion USD in 2025 and is expected to increase to approximately 55 billion USD by 2027 (Anshi et al., 2024). The need for bio-based, less harmful, and high-performance colorants has driven the demand for natural pigments. The ever-expanding cosmetic industry requires numerous sources of natural pigments (Agarwal et al., 2023). The growing demand for natural pigments in Asia is mainly due to industrialization and increasing population, and the demand for natural pigments is also increasing equally in European and American markets. Carotenoids are one of the pigments most widely used across food, cosmetics, medicine, textiles, beverages, and dietary supplements. The global demand remains high at 23.5% in 2023, and 80%–90% of the carotenoids present in the market are synthetic in nature (Abdelaziz et al., 2023). There are a few microbial-sourced pigments already on the market, such as riboflavin, alpha-carotene, and astaxanthin from Eremothecium gossypii, Bacillus trispora, and Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, respectively. The extraction of natural pigments from novel sources and their application have gained momentum among researchers at present (Kharkhota et al., 2022).

Pigments derived from microbes are identified as microbial pigments that bear health benefits for humans through essential nutrient supply, and their antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities are an added advantage (Di Salvo et al., 2023). Their low cost, durability, sustainability, availability, environment-friendly nature, and numerous sources and applications across various industries are some of the reasons for their high demand (Dufossé, 2019). Microbes produce a range of pigments to adapt to the ecosystem, exhibiting unique characteristics like protection against solar or UV radiation. Even though fungi, microalgae, and yeast produce pigments, bacteria-derived pigments attract the majority of the market due to their abundance and ready availability (Singh et al., 2021). Quinones, melanin, flavin, monascine, carotenoids, phenazines, and violacein are some of the examples of bacterial pigments with provitamin A and antitumor activity and temperature, pH, and photostability (Rather et al., 2023). Serretia mercescens produces the red-colored pigment prodigiosin with anticancer and antimicrobial activity in the presence of glucose and glycine. Dietzia natronolimnaea HS-1 produces the dark red-colored canthaxanthin used in the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries using cheese whey as a substrate, while Duganella sp., Janthinobacterium lividum, and Chromobacterium sp. produce the purple-colored violacein pigment that exhibits antitumoral, antioxidant, antiparasitic, and immunomodulatory activities. While red and yellow pigments are abundantly produced by several bacteria, only a few bacteria can produce blue pigments. Corynebacterium insidiosum produces indigoidine, which is blue in color and exhibits protection against oxidative stress. The blue-green color pigment pyocyanin, which helps in reducing inflammation, is produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Venil et al., 2020).

The Green Revolution has hit the cosmetic industry, advocating for health and safety and introducing a term called cosmeceuticals. It offers a new perspective besides beauty and attracts vibrant business ideas. In addition to their antioxidant and antiaging effects, bacterial pigments offer vibrant colors in cosmetic products (Pagels et al., 2022). Sun damage to the skin leads to wrinkles, aging, and even skin cancer. Regular sunblock products available in the market absorb UV rays rather than reflecting them, causing allergies and skin irritation (Mendes-Silva et al., 2020). Carotenoids curated from bacteria have gained attraction due to their anti-UV properties and antioxidant activities, causing less skin damage by reducing free radical production. It can be used as a natural sunscreen replacing chemical ingredients (Terao, 2023). Beta-carotene, lycopene, and astaxanthin are some of the naturally sourced carotenoid pigments. Antiaging creams are one of the most popular skin care products, and consumers are turning toward natural components (Chavda et al., 2023). The study by Kiki (2023) showed that beta-cryptoxanthin from Dunaliella salina and lycopene from Anabaena vaginicola can stimulate hyaluronic acid production, increasing skin hydration. Haematococcus pluvialis produces astaxanthin, which is known to improve skin moisture content, texture, and wrinkles (Liu, 2022). Japanese and Swedish skin care companies have marketed products containing astaxanthin for antiaging solution. Skin whitening creams are also very popular among Asian countries (Pollock et al., 2021). Tyrosinase inhibitors lead to decreased melanin production, catalyzing the pigmentation process. These compounds are being used to treat albinism. Fucoxanthin from Laminaria japonica and astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis are superior antioxidants due to their catalase and superoxide dismutase capabilities. Topical and oral astaxanthin can improve hyperpigmentation problems by stopping melanin production (Araújo et al., 2021). Chemicals like benzene and toluene are used for the vibrant colors of lipsticks and nail polish, which can be replaced by bacterial pigments offering safety and stability (Kalra et al., 2020). Marine microbes are being extensively studied for their cosmetic applications. Phycocyanin from marine algae is being used in eye shadow and eye makeup. Pigments extracted from red microalgae are used in red, purple, and pink lipstick and eye makeup (Yarkent et al., 2020). Microbial pigments from several environmental niches have attracted attention and are being studied for their use in the cosmetic industry. This review intends to explore the classification and biosynthetic pathways of bacterial pigments, highlighting the scope of genetic engineering for the enhanced production of pigments. It explores the use of bacterial pigments in cosmetic products and their advantages. This review also discusses the recent advances and technological innovations in pigment production from different bacterial sources. The challenges, limitations, and future perspectives of the revolutionary role of bacterial pigments in the cosmetic industry are also explored in this study.

2 Bacterial pigments

Bacterial pigments are characterized as diverse metabolites, which are generated by various microbial species. These pigments impart characteristic colors, but they also play physiological, ecological, and industrial roles. The broad classification of bacterial pigments is mainly based on color, chemical nature, biological function, and solubility (Agarwal et al., 2023).

2.1 Classification of bacterial pigments

2.1.1 Carotenoids

Carotenoids are yellow, red, or orange pigments that mainly protect bacterial species from oxidative stress. Micrococcus luteus and Serratia marcescens produce carotenoids (yellow color) and prodigiosin (red color), respectively. Carotenoids are isoprenoid compounds that are normally lipid-soluble (López et al., 2023).

2.1.2 Melanin

These are black or darkish brown, which are generated through phenolic compound oxidation. Melanin normally protects bacteria from free radicals, enzymatic lysis, and UV radiation. Some of the bacteria that produce melanin are Vibrio cholerae and Shewanella colwelliana (Celedón and Díaz, 2021; Thakur et al., 2025).

2.1.3 Quinones

These pigments usually work as electron carriers during bacterial respiration and photosynthesis. Some of the common quinones in bacterial species are menaquinones, ubiquinones, chlorobiumquionones, and rhodoquinones. Some of the common bacteria that produce these pigments are Escherichia coli (ubiquinones), P. aeruginosa (ubiquinones), and Staphylococcus aureus (menaquinones) (Celedón and Díaz, 2021).

2.1.4 Phenazine pigments

These are heterocyclic pigments possessing antimicrobial properties. The most common examples are pyocyanin (blue green) and pyorubin (red pigment), which are produced by P. aeruginosa. Also, these pigments act as electron carriers in redox reactions (Abdelaziz et al., 2023).

2.1.5 Other pigments

Certain bacteria generate unique pigments that do not fit into any of the above classifications, and examples include Janthinobacterium lividum, which produces violacein (purple color), and Streptomyces coelicolor, which produces actinorhodin (blue color) (Lyakhovchenko et al., 2024).

2.1.6 The Indian Himalayan region as a source of pigment-producing bacteria

Although the high-altitude Himalayan region visibly looks barren and lifeless, beneath its surface, rich and diverse microbial communities are found. These trans-Himalayan niches experience environmental stresses such as fluctuating temperatures, extreme cold, frequent freeze–thaw cycles, oxidative stress, high UV radiation, low oxygen levels, and low nutrient availability. The pigment production in the microbes of this region is considered an important adaptive strategy against these extreme conditions. There are a number of pigment-producing bacteria that have been identified from this region, and these are illustrated in Figure 1. The list of pigment-producing bacteria/phyla is summarized in Table 1.

Visual presentation of pigment-producing bacteria from the high-altitude trans-Himalayan region: **(a)** *Iodobacter* sp. PCH194, **(b)** *Streptomyces* sp. PCH436, **(c)** *Streptomyces* sp. PCH436, **(d)** *Janthinobacterium* sp. PCH410, **(e)** *Kocuria* sp. PCH206, **(f)** *Pedobacter* sp. PCH18, **(g)** *Pseudomonas* sp. PCH 413, **(h)** *Arthrobacter* sp., **(i)** *Bacillus* sp. PCH164, **(j)** *Flavobacterium* sp. PCH19, **(k)** *Arthrobacter* sp. PCH30, and **(l)** *Leifsonia* sp. PCH178. Reprinted from *Microbial pigments: learning from the Himalayan perspective to industrial applications* by Kumar et al. (2022), licensed under Creative Commons CC BY license, [https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuac017](https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuac017).
Figure 1. Visual presentation of pigment-producing bacteria from the high-altitude trans-Himalayan region: (a) Iodobacter sp. PCH194, (b) Streptomyces sp. PCH436, (c) Streptomyces sp. PCH436, (d) Janthinobacterium sp. PCH410, (e) Kocuria sp. PCH206, (f) Pedobacter sp. PCH18, (g) Pseudomonas sp. PCH 413, (h) Arthrobacter sp., (i) Bacillus sp. PCH164, (j) Flavobacterium sp. PCH19, (k) Arthrobacter sp. PCH30, and (l) Leifsonia sp. PCH178. Reprinted from Microbial pigments: learning from the Himalayan perspective to industrial applications by Kumar et al. (2022), licensed under Creative Commons CC BY license, https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuac017.

Table 1. List of pigment-producing bacteria/phyla along with pigment name.

Pigment(s)Bacteria/phylumApplication/activityReferences
ProdigiosinSerratia plymuthica and Serratia marcescensTextile dyeingSimsek Geyik et al. (2025)
ProdigiosinSerratia marcescens ATCC 8100Textile dyeingZhang et al. (2024)
StaphyloxanthinStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538Textile dyeingZhang et al. (2024)
CarotenoidParacoccus marcusii RSPO1Textile dyeing, antimicrobial and antiallergic activitiesNaik and Gupte (2024)
PyocyaninPseudomonas aeruginosaAntibacterial, antioxidant, and anticancer activitiesAbdelaziz et al. (2023)
β-CaroteneCitricoccus parietis AUCsAntibacterial, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activitiesHagaggi and Abdul-Raouf (2023)
Blue-green pigmentPseudomonas aeruginosaFabric dyeing, antimicrobial and antiallergic activitiesSengupta and Bhowal (2023)
ProdigiosinSerratia plymuthicaFabric dyeing, antibacterial and antioxidant activitiesAmorim et al. (2022)
Flexirubin-type pigmentChryseobacterium shigenseFabric dyeing, antibacterial and antioxidant activitiesAmorim et al. (2022)
ProdigiosinEnterobacter sp. PWN1Pigment productionPoddar et al. (2021)
Total carotenoidsR. toruloides ATCC204091, R. glutinis Y1Pigment productionSinha et al. (2021)
Violacein, deoxyviolaceinIodobacter sp. PCH194Anticancer and antimicrobial activitiesKumar et al. (2021)
Total carotenoidsR. toruloides, L. starkeyiPigment productionLiu et al. (2020)
Torularhodin, β-carotene, toruleneR. mucilaginosaPigment productionGhilardi et al. (2020)
LycopeneR. faecalis PA2Pigment productionPatthawaro et al. (2020)
Torularhodin, β-carotene, toruleneR. mucilaginosa MTCC-1403Pigment productionSharma and Ghoshal (2020)
β-CaroteneR. gracilis ATCC 10788Pigment productionKot et al. (2020)
Red pigmentRhodonellum psychrophillumFabric dyeing and antimicrobial activityBisht et al. (2020)
β-CaroteneB. trispora MTCC 884Antioxidant activityKaur et al. (2019)
Yellow colorFlavobacterium bomense sp.Pigment productionLiu et al. (2019)
Yellow, orange, brown, violet, and pinkish-redProteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, BacteroidetesAntioxidant activityPanwar et al. (2019)
Carotenoids (various colors)Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and FirmicutesPigment productionShen et al. (2018)
ViolaceinC. violaceum UTM5Anticancer and antimicrobial activitiesAruldass et al. (2018)
Prodigiosin (red pigment)Serratia nematodiphila RL2Antimicrobial activityGondil et al. (2017)
Total carotenoidsR. glutinisPigment productionKanzy et al. (2015)
Carotenoids (yellow-orange)Sanguibacter suarezii KK6, Kocuria turfanensis KK7, Kocuria rosea KK12, Planococcus maritimus KK21Pigment productionKushwaha et al. (2014)
Various pigmentsFirmicutes, alpha- and gamma-Proteobacteria, ActinobacteriaPigment productionShen et al. (2012)
Total carotenoidsR. sphaeroides O.U.001Pigment productionEroglu et al. (2010)
Violacein (violet)Janthinobacterium lividum XT1Pigment productionLu et al. (2009)
Yellow pigmentLeifsonia pindariensisPigment productionReddy et al. (2008)

2.2 Biosynthetic pathways of pigment production in bacteria

Bacteria generate various pigments through special biosynthetic pathways, which originate from primary metabolic intermediates. The biosynthetic pathways are often regulated by environmental and genetic factors. Understanding bacterial biosynthetic pathways is crucial in aiding metabolic engineering for enhanced pigment synthesis. Several biosynthetic routes differ on the basis of the chemical nature of the pigment (Agarwal et al., 2023; Barreto et al., 2023).

2.2.1 Biosynthesis of carotenoids

The synthesis of carotenoids begins with isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) condensation, to form geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). Two molecules of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate combine to form phytoene, which later undergoes cyclization and desaturation reactions, producing carotenoids such as lycopene, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene. Certain bacteria such as Rhodobacter spp. and M. luteus follow this biosynthetic pathway (Wang et al., 2024).

2.2.2 Biosynthesis of phenazine

Pigments such as pyocyanin are generated in P. aeruginosa through the shikimate pathway. Chorismic acid functions as a key intermediate and undergoes various enzymatic reactions, which is catalyzed by the phz (phenazine biosynthetic) gene cluster. This leads to the production of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA), which can be later modified into pyorubin and pyocyanin (Abdelaziz et al., 2023).

2.2.3 Biosynthesis of melanin

Melanin is formed through oxidation of tyrosine, with the help of the enzyme tyrosinase, leading to the generation of dopaquinone, which gradually polymerizes into dark melanin. Certain other bacteria produce melanin through the 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) or homogentisate pathways (Pavan et al., 2020).

2.2.4 Biosynthesis of prodigiosin

Serratia marcescens synthesizes the red pigment prodigiosin through the tripyrrole pathway. 2-Methyl-3-n-amyl-pyrrole and 4-methoxy-2,2′-bipyrrole-5-carboxyaldehyde are the two intermediates formed in this pathway. These two intermediates are condensed with the help of certain enzymes to produce prodigiosin (Williams, 1973).

2.2.5 Biosynthesis of violacein

Chromobacterium violaceum synthesizes violacein from the amino acid tryptophan. The amino acid tryptophan is converted into indole derivatives using an enzyme coded by the vioABCDE gene cluster. Indole derivatives gradually undergo oxidative coupling in order to form violacein (Hui et al., 2022).

2.3 Genetic and metabolic engineering approaches for enhanced pigment production

Most of the bacterial pigments such as carotenoids, melanin, and violacein have significant applications in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical, textile, and food industries (Sundar and Sivaperumal, 2022). However, natural pigment production is mostly limited due to low yields, suboptimal metabolic fluxes, and regulatory constraints. In order to overcome these, genetic and metabolic engineering approaches are employed nowadays to enhance the biosynthesis of bacterial pigments (Lee and Schmidt-Dannert, 2002).

2.3.1 Genetic engineering

This includes direct manipulation of bacterial pigment-producing genes and metabolic pathways. Some of the techniques such as heterologous expression, gene deletion, and overexpression have transformed pigment biosynthesis. In case of gene overexpression, genes controlling rate-regulating enzymes are amplified to increase bacterial pigment yield. For instance, in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, overexpression of the crtY gene increases β-carotene synthesis. An overview of the promoter optimization strategy is shown in Figure 2 (Qiang et al., 2019). In another work, from C. violaceum, overexpression of the genes vioA–E increases the violacein production in E. coli (Balibar and Walsh, 2006). In this mechanism, VioA (flavoenzyme) and VioB (heme protein) cooperatively oxidize and dimerize L-tryptophan to result in an intermediate that can yield chromopyrrolic acid off-pathway. VioE presence precedes the reaction via [1,2]-indole rearrangement to prodeoxyviolacein. The final flavin-dependent oxygenases, VioD and VioC, sequentially hydroxylate and oxidize the indole rings at positions 5 and 2, respectively, completing violacein biosynthesis.

Graphical presentation of the promoter optimization strategy in the engineered *Rhodobacter* sp*haeroides* for β-carotene synthesis. Reprinted with permission from Qiang et al. (2019). Copyright (2019) by the American Chemical Society. Opt, codon optimization; CrtY, lycopene cyclase (from *P. agglomerans)*; Zwf, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Dxs, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase.
Figure 2. Graphical presentation of the promoter optimization strategy in the engineered Rhodobacter sphaeroides for β-carotene synthesis. Reprinted with permission from Qiang et al. (2019). Copyright (2019) by the American Chemical Society. Opt, codon optimization; CrtY, lycopene cyclase (from P. agglomerans); Zwf, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Dxs, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase.

In another study, transcription factor and promoter engineering was performed to enhance prodigiosin production in Serratia marcescens JNB5-1 (Pan et al., 2022). In this study, first, a Tn5G transposon insertion library identified the response regulator BVG89_19895 (OmpR) as a positive regulator of prodigiosin synthesis. Thereafter, RNA-Seq, GFP reporter, and RT-qPCR analyses revealed the promoter P17 (PRplJ) as a strong constitutive promoter. Overexpression of OmpR and PsrA in the strain JNB5–1 generated a recombinant strain PG-6. The generated recombinant strain achieved a prodigiosin titer of 10.25 g/L, which was 1.62-fold higher than the parent strain (6.33 g/L).

2.3.2 Metabolic engineering approaches

The rise in the demand for carotenoid pigments has laid the foundation for the increased production of these pigments through metabolic engineering of their biosynthesis pathways. The first attempt for lycopene production was carried out in a fungus (S. cerevisiae) with the carotenogenic genes of the Eubacterium Pantoea ananatis (Yamano et al., 1994). However, considerable efforts have been made in the metabolic engineering of E. coli to produce carotenoids (lycopene, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin) at a higher titer (Das et al., 2007). Escherichia coli has been observed as a choice of host for the heterologous carotenoid production due to the fact that it can accommodate and express the carotenogenic genes from bacteria, fungi, and plants. In this context, the improved production of carotenoid in E. coli has been achieved through metabolic engineering of the endogenous MEP (2-C-methyl-D-erythritol4-phosphate) pathway and through introducing a heterologous mevalonate (MVA) pathway. The engineering of these pathways is intended to increase the intracellular supply of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP), which is a key precursor for carotenoid biosynthesis. Furthermore, improvements in carotenoid production have been made by engineering the prenyl diphosphate and central metabolic pathways (Lee and Schmidt-Dannert, 2002). The MVA and MEP pathways begin with substrates, viz., acetyl-CoA, pyruvate, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P), produced in the glycolytic pathway (Figure 3). Therefore, regulating the production of these metabolites can improve carotenoid production. Pyruvate is considered a more crucial precursor, as it finds itself in multiple metabolic routes and is more abundant than G3P for isoprenoid biosynthesis. The MEP pathway utilizes pyruvate and G3P in equal amounts for IPP synthesis. Hence, modulation of these intermediate enzymes can alter the metabolic flux between these intermediates to enhance lycopene production in E. coli (Farmer and Liao, 2001). In these studies, it was observed that G3P is a limiting factor in lycopene biosynthesis. Therefore, inactivation of the competing pathways branching at the pyruvate and acetyl-CoA nodes increases 45% of lycopene production in the engineered E. coli strain as compared to the parent E. coli strain (Vadali et al., 2005). Production was further improved by incorporating the MVA pathway from the Streptomyces sp. strain CL190 into the E. coli strain (inactivated). This bioengineering fostered the acetyl-CoA pool for IPP synthesis, which eventually resulted in a 2-fold increase in lycopene production as compared to the native MEP pathway. In another study, the co-expression of the exogenous MEP pathway genes (dxs and idi) in E. coli promoted the transcription of isoprenoid pathway genes (Wang et al., 2015). In this case, there was a 16.5 times increase in the yield (20.57 mg/L) of lycopene.

Schematic overview of β-carotene biosynthesis via the MEP and MVA pathways. Reprinted from Yang and Guo (2014); article is under Commons Attribution License ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)).
Figure 3. Schematic overview of β-carotene biosynthesis via the MEP and MVA pathways. Reprinted from Yang and Guo (2014); article is under Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).

Introduction of a heterologous MVA pathway into E. coli represents a promising strategy for enhancing carotenoid biosynthesis. The MVA pathway can be functionally divided into two segments: the upper (top) and lower (bottom) pathways. The final step of the upper pathway, catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase, serves as a rate-limiting step in the process. In this regard, promoter-driven overexpression of the cHMG1 gene from S. cerevisiae in Neurospora crassa has been shown to increase the production of lycopene and neurosporaxanthin (Wang and Keasling, 2002). Similarly, E. coli has also been metabolically engineered for the co-overexpression of crtY, crtZ, and ZEP encoding the enzymes lycopene β-cyclase, β-carotene 3-hydroxylase, and zeaxanthin epoxidase, respectively (Xinrui et al., 2023). The engineered strain was able to produce a violaxanthin yield of 25.28 ± 3.94 mg/g DCW along with a lowering in the accumulation of by-products. Cheng et al. (2022) introduced the heterologous lycopene biosynthetic pathway into E. coli, and this was organized into three modules. In the modules, MVA and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) acted as connecting intermediates. The intermodule balance was optimized by controlling the expression level of the genes, viz., MVK, PMK, MVD, and IDI (involved in downstream), through a ribosome binding site library with defined expression strengths. The bioengineering resulted in 4.6 times more yield of lycopene (219.7 mg/g DCW) as compared to the reference strain.

2.3.3 Synthetic biology and advanced engineering tools

CRISPR/Cas9 is an exciting technology for bioengineering the metabolic pathway of bacteria for desired applications. However, it has been less explored for pigment production in bacteria. CRISPR has been used to enhance β-carotene production from the IPP and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) through the MEP pathway. The technology has been used to engineer the central metabolic routes and regulate the metabolic fluxes by targeted gene deletions and strategic gene overexpression (Cho et al., 2018). In another work, E. coli strains possessing the biosynthetic MVA pathway and terpenoid synthases (plant-derived) have been engineered using the CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) system for suppressing the expression of acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase enzyme. This enzyme is responsible for catalyzing the first step of the MVA pathway (Kim et al., 2016). This bioengineering has been observed to enhance the production of (−)-α-bisabolol (C15) and lycopene (C40). Furthermore, it also mitigated cell growth inhibition and accumulation of toxic intermediates within the MVA pathway. Similarly, CRISPRi-based library targeting of 74 genes was done in Corynebacterium glutamicum (Göttl et al., 2021). The results indicated that CRISPRi-mediated repression of the carotenogenesis repressor gene crtR led to enhanced pigmentation and increased accumulation of the native carotenoid pigment decaprenoxanthin. CRISPRi screening identified 14 genes whose repression influenced decaprenoxanthin biosynthesis. Out of the 14 genes identified, repression of 11 genes reduced carotenoid production, and repression of 3 genes promoted decaprenoxanthin synthesis. Furthermore, deletion of pgi and gapA genes enhanced decaprenoxanthin production by 43- and 9-fold, respectively. Another study utilized the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system for actinomycetes for two chromogenic reporter systems (GusA and IdgS) (Göttl et al., 2021). The researchers deleted a single gene, i.e., actIORFI (SCO5087 of the actinorhodin gene cluster), in S. coelicolor M145. They also deleted the small gene cluster of 5.5 kb responsible for orange-pigmented carotenoid production and a relatively large gene cluster (61 kb) corresponding to the abyssomicin biosynthetic pathway in Verrucosispora sp. MS100137.

3 Applications in cosmetic formulations

3.1 Cosmetic products incorporating bacterial pigments

Biodegradability, stability, and bioactivity have placed bacterial pigments in the spotlight as alternatives to synthetic dyes in the cosmetics sector and as being environmentally friendly, sustainable, and natural (Barreto et al., 2023). These pigments are incorporated into a broad category of cosmetic products such as lipsticks, skin creams and lotions, nail polishes, hair dyes, soaps, and body washes.

3.1.1 Lipsticks, nail polishes, and hair dyes

Microbial carotenoids and prodigiosin-like pigments have color intensities ranging between red and orange. These pigments can be natural alternatives to azo dyes (Devi et al., 2024). Their high coloring intensity along with their antioxidant activity can be the reason for their acceptance in lip care applications. Furthermore, these natural pigments reduce the risk of direct skin contact and ingestion of synthetic chemicals, hence are biocompatible (Huang et al., 2024b). Similarly, these microbial pigments can also be used for nail polishes, as they cover a broad range of colors. These natural pigments derived from bacteria are biocompatible, and their use in place of chemical-based nail polishes can help minimize adverse effects associated with synthetic colorants. Furthermore, these colors could be the best option for the manufacturing of natural hair colors.

3.1.2 Skin creams and lotions

It is well known that UV radiation from the sun can lead to adverse health effects such as pigmentation, erythema, immunosuppression, photoaging, and even skin cancer (Choksi et al., 2020). Therefore, sunscreens are commonly used to protect the skin from UV rays. Most sunscreens in the market utilize chemicals for the screening of these UV rays, but due to the growing awareness and demand for natural alternatives in recent years, there is a need for natural and effective pigments for skin products. Researchers are also focusing on identifying new, cost-effective natural sunscreen agents from bacterial and other natural sources (Goswami et al., 2013). There are a number of microorganisms that produce pigments and provide protection against UV-induced damage (Suryawanshi et al., 2015). Bacterial pigments such as prodigiosin, violacein, and melanin have been reported by various research groups for their strong UV-protective effect (Siezen, 2011; Darshan and Manonmani, 2015; Kothari et al., 2017). These pigments also exhibit strong antioxidant activity, making them suitable for incorporation into creams and lotions to enhance skin protection. In a study, the bacterium Virgibacillus salarius strain 19.PP.Sc1.6 has been identified for carotenoid production (Kusmita et al., 2021). The carotenoid pigments from the bacterium were utilized in the development of antiaging creams and demonstrated significant antiaging activity.

3.1.3 Soaps and body washes

Soaps and body washes have not been documented with bacterial pigments, but there are a few reports where fungal pigments and other plant pigments were utilized in these products. Asnani and Diastuti developed a glycerine soap utilizing the red pigment from Streptomyces K-4 B and Dayak onion (Eleutherine palmifolia (L.) Merr) (Herlina and Diastuti, 2017). The results of the developed product were assessed based on color, aroma, texture, foam, and rough impression upon usage and after usage and were observed to be in the “like to very like soap” category (score of 4.67 in the scale of 1 to 5) and “like to very like” category (score of 4.30 in the scale of 1 to 5). Additionally, bacterial glycolipids and lipopeptides have been reported for their emulsifying, detergency, foaming, and skin moisturizing capabilities. The pigments from bacteria can be an alternative to chemical colors along with their emulsifying, moisturizing, and antioxidant properties. However, this area of pigment-producing bacteria is not well established, and still a lot of biotechnological interventions that can be made.

3.2 Functional benefits beyond coloring

In addition to their ability to color, bacterial pigments have functional activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiaging activities, which have contributed to increasing the therapeutic properties of cosmetics.

3.2.1 Antioxidant activity

Carotenoid, violacein, and prodigiosin pigments possess an effective free-radical scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibitory effect, playing a role in photoprotection of the skin and related repair (Kiki, 2023; Devi et al., 2024). Incorporated into topical preparations, these pigments prevent oxidative stress caused by UV radiation and pollutants, hence preserving the dermal homeostasis (Venil et al., 2020).

3.2.2 Antimicrobial activities

Numerous bacterial pigments, such as prodigiosin and pyocyanin, have neutral antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, Candida albicans, and E. coli (Yusuf et al., 2017; Salman et al., 2025). In a study, Micrococcus species of bacteria isolated from soil samples were reported to produce a yellow pigment (Sinha et al., 2017). The pigments were observed for their antibacterial activity against S. aureus (23 mm), Candida (14 mm), and S. typhi (10 mm), which was comparable to penicillin (19 mm) and gentamicin (17 mm) against S. aureus. In another study, the bacterial pigment carotenoid from Rhodotorula glutinis (PTCC 5256) was able to exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enteritidis and E. coli (Yolmeh, 2016). Likewise, S. marcescens, C. violaceum, and P. aeruginosa were observed to produce pigments such as prodigiosin, violacein, and pyocyanin, respectively (Salman et al., 2025). These pigments have been able to inhibit the growth of 30 clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella spp., and Candida spp.

3.2.3 Antiaging activities

Microbial pigments as antiaging bioactives reduce oxidative stress and preserve collagen integrity. Carotenoid creams and violacein emulsions increase the elasticity of the skin and inhibit photoaging by suppressing reactive oxygen species (Orlandi et al., 2022). Furthermore, they have the potential to suppress the activity of tyrosinase, creating skin-brightening effects, and thus extending their uses in antiaging and cosmeceutical collections. The bacteriochlorophyll a pigment from R. sphaeroides has been observed for its antioxidant activity of 63.8% in aqueous extract form (Kim et al., 2015). Similarly, s pigment–protein complex from Chlorella pyrenoidosa has been observed to inhibit the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 and inflammatory mediator nitric oxide formation in simulated conditions (Zhang et al., 2019). Likewise, carotenoid pigments from Flavobacterium sp. and Brevibacterium sp. were able to provide significant protection against UVA-B to UVC radiation (Patki et al., 2021). These pigments further exhibited good antimicrobial activity against E. coli, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and S. aureus along with remarkable antioxidant activity. These multifunctional properties from pigment-producing bacteria show their potential use in cosmetic products. However, limited studies have been done in this field, and more research is required for its global acceptance and recognition.

4 Recent advances and technological innovations

Refinement of innate pigment-producing bacterial strains could be achieved through biotechnological (genetic engineering) strategies for short-term fermentations, giving maximal yields. This is possible through appropriate screening of the best (hyper) pigment-producing bacterial strains, targeting the genetic matter that acts as a regulator/determinant of the respective bacterial pigments (Orlandi et al., 2022). Genetic engineering of pigment-producing bacterial strains may involve random mutagenesis or specific site-directed mutagenesis to increase the desired pigment production. This strain improvement was attained using microwave (bacterial prodigiosin from S. marcescens) and ultraviolet radiations and chemicals like 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine and ethyl methane sulfonate, to mention a few (Shrestha et al., 2025). Violacein, from the strain Pseudogulbenkiania ferrooxidans, has contributed to the cosmetic industry, with its whole genome data relied upon to better understand its biosynthesis pathway (Mehta et al., 2025). Progressive advances in the field of genetic engineering have paved the way for positive shifts in innate bacterial strains, leading to the production of pigments of interest to researchers/industrialists. To introduce a specific case, the blue pigment-producing S. coelicolor might be manipulated genetically to produce red, brilliant yellow, yellow, and orange pigments, thus being capable of generating inherent and acquired colors (pigments) (Mehta et al., 2025).

Metabolic engineering and microbial bioconversions aid fermentation microbiologists in scaling up the laboratory bioprocesses (Mandal and Majumdar, 2023). Alternative biotechnological preference focused on the augmentation of the pigment-producing strains’ culture medium with applicable stimulators, thereby physically and statistically modeling and optimizing the fermentation pathways for shorter periods and maximum bacterial pigment gains. Pardhan et al. reported the psychrotolerant Paenibacillus sp. BPW19 for the first time, which produced intracellular pink pigment and was isolated from wastewater, belonging to the Paenibacillus genus (Padhan et al., 2021). In a cost-effective (zero-energy) manner, the production of the pigment and its solvent extraction resulted in high pigment gains. In the last half decade, the pigment-producing bacterial strains’ responses to their vicinity and surroundings (microbial communications) are well-studied in terms of quorum sensing and evocation, as a model for the extra production of bacterial pigments at an industrial scale, particularly prodigiosin and violacein pigments, as well as deep blue pigments (Pantoea agglomerans) (Fujikawa and Akimoto, 2011). Gene cloning is another prominent strategy to produce positive clones of the desired pigment producers with a suitable expression vector. The effective application of bacterial pigments as colorants in cosmetics may be restrained due to weak water solubility, poor chemical stability, delicate skin absorption, and minimal bioavailability factors. Over and above that, few biopigments (biocolorants) have high molecular weight, which can hinder their penetration (permeation) into the stratum corneum (the foremost skin layer) (Venil et al., 2013). In light of the current circumstances, it becomes mandatory for an industrialist to appropriately design product delivery systems in an efficient and scientific way that allows easy and safe penetration into the skin. Such highly unstable, less bioavailable, poorly soluble biopigments need advanced tools for systematic delivery and best skin outcomes. In the recent past, bacterial pigments like astaxanthin and carotenoids were capable of defending against the aging processes, preventing skin protein degradation. To further enhance the pigment delivery process, tetraethyl orthosilicate inside lecithin vesicles formed silicified liposomes, also known as silicated phospholipids, which served as the transporters of astaxanthin in cosmetic products (Liu and Nizet, 2009; Moura-Alves et al., 2014). This combination, along with boron nitride—one of the prevailing cosmetic ingredients, gives the best blend for superior adherence to smooth skin and eventually fine-tuning the skin texture (Li et al., 2024). Such astaxanthin liposomes could be incorporated in lipsticks, concealers, and even eye skin care products (Souto et al., 2020). Following microencapsulation, nanoencapsulation, liposomes by spray drying, emulsions by spray drying, lyophilization (freeze-drying) encapsulation, hydrogel encapsulation, and co-crystallization encapsulation are popular delivery systems of bacterial pigments, universally in the case of carotenoids (Bhandari et al., 2022; Díaz-Montes, 2025). Considering economic viability, scalability, and safeness, researchers choose prevalent encapsulation methodologies with utmost care, understanding the characteristics and nature of the bacteria-derived pigments being encapsulated. The unification and implementation of the newest tools and technologies in the fields of protein engineering, systems biology, bioprocess technology for optimized yields, process engineering, high-efficiency methodologies for pigment producers’ cultivation, survival-of-the-fittest screening and genome analyses, and metabolic engineering of pigment-producing bacteria for high yields is anticipated to become all-powerful and scientifically influential (Vieira et al., 2020). Along with the advancements and innovations in biotechnology, synthetic biology, chemistry, and forthcoming metabolic engineering, the production of microbes, particularly bacteria, will enormously amplify the number of biopigments that could be produced within stipulated fermentation periods economically (Acharya et al., 2024).

5 Challenges and future perspectives

Although there are several pigment-producing microbes existing in diverse environmental conditions, the production and yield of pigments by bacteria and other microorganisms are highly dependent on factors such as pH, temperature, media constituents/substrate, seasonal climatic variations, location, habitats, and genetic constitution (Numan et al., 2018). Furthermore, the production of bacterial pigments through fermentation is affected by the bioreactors and their design, type of fermentation process, and physicochemical and biological conditions (Venil et al., 2014). The nature of pigments is highly variable, and as a result, their solubility also differs. Therefore, identifying a suitable solvent system for each pigment is essential. Since different bacteria and microbes produce pigments at varying temperatures, analyzing the thermal stability of these pigments is an important criterion that needs to be explored. Although bacterial pigments possess several properties that make them suitable for use in cosmetic products, studies on their toxicity remain limited. For global acceptance and recognition, extensive toxicological evaluations of these pigments are essential (Nainangu et al., 2025). Such studies will also help enhance their industrial demand and applications (Ramesh et al., 2019). All cosmetic pigments, including microbial pigments, fall under the U.S. FDA’s Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) (Alshehrei, 2024). According to these acts and regulations, it is mandatory to conduct toxicity testing, heavy metal analysis, microbiological analysis, and particle size evaluation without pre-market approval for cosmetic products. Color additives must receive specific FDA approval before their use in cosmetic products, and the microbial limit is set at 10,000 CFU/g for general topical cosmetics with the complete absence of pathogens like P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and C. albicans. For each pigment batch, it is important to obtain the certificates of analysis from designated officials (Huang et al., 2024a). Furthermore, the product should contain a safety data sheet to provide detailed hazard information in the Globally Harmonized System format. Cosmetic products should also contain a technical specification sheet describing the physical and chemical properties of the pigments, such as color index numbers, chemical structure, solubility, and stability.

The yield of pigment produced by native bacterial strains is often very low; however, this can be enhanced by optimizing the growth conditions of bacteria. Furthermore, this yield can be improved by employing the response surface methodology in combination with artificial neural network like statistical approaches (Venil et al., 2014). Recently, transformations in technology have opened the doors for artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for their promising use to optimize the fermentation processes (Chong et al., 2024). Short-term goals can be high-throughput strain screening from diverse environments and habitats to identify hyperproducer strains with stable, vibrant hues suitable for product development. Furthermore, exploration of extremophilic conditions to identify novel bacterial species can account for new pigments with peculiar features such as stability, bioactivity, and multifunctionality. In addition to these approaches, metabolic engineering and synthetic biology can enhance the production of bacterial pigments along with enabling the bacteria for the heterologous production of pigments. Metabolic engineering is useful in improving the precursor supply, reducing/eliminating the competing metabolic pathways, and increasing the availability of cofactors. This approach can also expand the diversity and scale of bacterial pigment production by integrating pigment-producing genes from fungi, plants, and animals. Improving bacterial strains using CRISPR/Cas and other genome editing tools can help eliminate undesired genes and enhance strain efficiency for pigment production. The adoption of a circular bioeconomy model for pigment production, emphasizing the valorization of agricultural and food-industry wastes and other low-cost substrates for bacterial pigment fermentation, can make the process more cost-effective and sustainable (Rajendran et al., 2023).

6 Conclusion

The demand for natural cosmetic products has definitely provided a strong foundation for the utilization of bacteria as a source of natural pigments. The multiple health benefits, along with the desirable properties of bacterial pigments for cosmetic products, have already been reported by several research groups. The range of colors produced by these bacteria is also quite broad. However, most of these reports are from research laboratories and are at the very initial stages of investigation. Furthermore, the yield obtained from these microorganisms is also very low. The standardization of process parameters, strain improvement, and the adoption of a sustainable approach for pigment production may provide a boost for industrial-scale recognition and global acceptance of these pigments. The research and development sector is still in a nascent stage for exploring these pigment-producing bacteria.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Barkha Singhal, Gautam Buddha University, India

Reviewed by: Luqman Jameel Rather, Southwest University, China

Dalia Dasgupta Mandal, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling editor BS declared a past co-authorship with the authors PC.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Author contributions

PC: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization. MK: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Formal analysis. BT: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Formal analysis. JT: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Visualization. HS: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DS: Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Supervision.

References

  1. Abdelaziz A. A., Kamer A. M. A., Al-Monofy K. B., Al-Madboly L. A. (2023). Pseudomonas aeruginosa’s greenish-blue pigment pyocyanin: its production and biological activities. Microb. Cell Fact. 22, 110. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02122-1
  2. Acharya K., Shaw S., Bhattacharya S. P., Biswas S., Bhandary S., Bhattacharya A. (2024). Pigments from pathogenic bacteria: a comprehensive update on recent advances. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40, 270. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s11274-024-04076-x
  3. Agarwal H., Bajpai S., Mishra A., Kohli I., Varma A., Fouillaud M.. (2023). Bacterial pigments and their multifaceted roles in contemporary biotechnology and pharmacological applications. Microorganisms 11, 614. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms11030614
  4. Alegbe E. O., Uthman T. O. (2024). A review of history, properties, classification, applications and challenges of natural and synthetic dyes. Heliyon 10 (13)., PMID:
  5. Alshehrei F. M. (2024). Microbiological Quality Assessment of Skin and Body care Cosmetics by using Challenge test. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 31, 103965. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.103965
  6. Amorim L. F. A., Fangueiro R., Gouveia I. C. (2022). Characterization of bioactive colored materials produced from bacterial cellulose and bacterial pigments. Materials 15, 2069. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/ma15062069
  7. Anshi, Kapil S., Goswami L., Sharma V. (2024). Unveiling the intricacies of microbial pigments as sustainable alternatives to synthetic colorants: recent trends and advancements. Micro, 621 – 640.
  8. Araújo R., Vázquez Calderón F., Sánchez López J., Azevedo I. C., Bruhn A., Fluch S.. (2021). Current status of the algae production industry in Europe: an emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 626389.
  9. Aruldass C. A., Masalamany S. R. L., Venil C. K., Ahmad W. A. (2018). Antibacterial mode of action of violacein from Chromobacterium violaceum UTM5 against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 25, 5164 – 5180. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8855-2
  10. Balibar C. J., Walsh C. T. (2006). In Vitro Biosynthesis of Violacein from l -Tryptophan by the Enzymes VioA–E from Chromobacterium violaceum. Biochemistry 45, 15444 – 15457. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1021/bi061998z
  11. Barreto J.V., De O., Casanova L. M., Junior A. N., Reis-Mansur M. C. P. P., Vermelho A. B. (2023). Microbial pigments: major groups and industrial applications. Microorganisms 11, 2920. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms11122920
  12. Bhandari M., Sharma R., Sharma S., Bobade H., Singh B. (2022). Recent advances in nanoencapsulation of natural pigments: emerging technologies, stability, therapeutic properties and potential food applications. Pig. Resin. Technol. 53, 53 – 61. doi: doi:10.1108/PRT-04-2022-0050
  13. Bisht G., Srivastava S., Kulshreshtha R., Sourirajan A., Baumler D. J., Dev K. (2020). Applications of red pigments from psychrophilic Rhodonellum psychrophilum GL8 in health, food and antimicrobial finishes on textiles. Proc. Biochem. 94, 15 – 29. doi: doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2020.03.021
  14. Celedón R. S., Díaz L. B. (2021). Natural pigments of bacterial origin and their possible biomedical applications. Microorganisms 9, 739. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms9040739
  15. Chavda V. P., Acharya D., Hala V., Daware S., Vora L. K. (2023). Sunscreens: A comprehensive review with the application of nanotechnology. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 86, 104720.
  16. Cheng T., Wang L., Sun C., Xie C. (2022). Optimizing the downstream MVA pathway using a combination optimization strategy to increase lycopene yield in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell Fact. 21, 121. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1186/s12934-022-01843-z
  17. Cho S., Shin J., Cho B.-K. (2018). Applications of CRISPR/cas system to bacterial metabolic engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1089. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/ijms19041089
  18. Choksi J., Vora J., Shrivastava N. (2020). Bioactive pigments from isolated bacteria and its antibacterial, antioxidant and sun protective application useful for cosmetic products. Indian J. Microbiol. 60, 379 – 382. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s12088-020-00870-x
  19. Chong J. W. R., Khoo K. S., Chew K. W., Ting H.-Y., Iwamoto K., Show P. L. (2024). Digitalised prediction of blue pigment content from Spirulina platensis: Next-generation microalgae bio-molecule detection. Algal. Res. 83, 103642. doi: doi:10.1016/j.algal.2024.103642
  20. Darshan N., Manonmani H. K. (2015). Prodigiosin and its potential applications. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52, 5393 – 5407. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s13197-015-1740-4
  21. Das A., Yoon S.-H., Lee S.-H., Kim J.-Y., Oh D.-K., Kim S.-W. (2007). An update on microbial carotenoid production: application of recent metabolic engineering tools. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 505 – 512. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s00253-007-1206-3
  22. Devi M., Ramakrishnan E., Deka S., Parasar D. P. (2024). Bacteria as a source of biopigments and their potential applications. J. Microbiol. Methods 219, 106907. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2024.106907
  23. Díaz-Montes E. (2025). Advances in the preservation of plant-based pigments via spray drying—A systematic review. Processes 13, 663. doi: doi:10.3390/pr13030663
  24. Di Salvo E., Lo Vecchio G., De Pasquale R., De Maria L., Tardugno R., Vadalà R.. (2023). Natural pigments production and their application in food, health and other industries. Nutrients 15 (8), 1923., PMID:
  25. Dufossé L. (2019). Research, development, and production of microalgal and microbial biocolorants. Bioprocessing for Biomolecules Production, 71 – 92.
  26. Eroglu E., Gunduz U., Yucel M., Eroglu I. (2010). Photosynthetic bacterial growth and productivity under continuous illumination or diurnal cycles with olive mill wastewater as feedstock. Int. J. H. Energy 35, 5293 – 5300. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.063
  27. Farmer W. R., Liao J. C. (2001). Precursor balancing for metabolic engineering of lycopene production in escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Prog. 17, 57 – 61. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1021/bp000137t
  28. Fujikawa H., Akimoto R. (2011). New Blue Pigment Produced by Pantoea agglomerans and Its Production Characteristics at Various Temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 172 – 178. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1128/AEM.00264-10
  29. Ghilardi C., Sanmartin Negrete P., Carelli A. A., Borroni V. (2020). Evaluation of olive mill waste as substrate for carotenoid production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Bioresour. Bioproc. 7, 52. doi: doi:10.1186/s40643-020-00341-7
  30. Gondil V. S., Asif M., Bhalla T. C. (2017). Optimization of physicochemical parameters influencing the production of prodigiosin from Serratia nematodiphila RL2 and exploring its antibacterial activity. 3. Biotech. 7, 338. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s13205-017-0979-z
  31. Goswami P. K., Samant M., Srivastava R. (2013). Natural sunscreen agents: A review. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm. 2, 458 – 463.
  32. Göttl V. L., Schmitt I., Braun K., Peters-Wendisch P., Wendisch V. F., Henke N. A. (2021). CRISPRi-library-guided target identification for engineering carotenoid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microorganisms 9, 670. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms9040670
  33. Hagaggi N. S. A., Abdul-Raouf U. M. (2023). Production of bioactive β-carotene by the endophytic bacterium Citricoccus parietis AUCs with multiple in vitro biological potentials. Microb. Cell Fact. 22, 90. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02108-z
  34. Herlina A. A., Diastuti H. (2017). The application of red pigments from streptomyces K-4B and dayak onions (Eleutherine palmifolia (L.) merr.) in colouring glycerine soap. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 172, 12023. doi: doi:10.1088/1757-899X/172/1/012023
  35. Huang X., Gan L., He Z., Jiang G., He T. (2024 b). Bacterial pigments as a promising alternative to synthetic colorants: from fundamentals to applications. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34, 2153. doi:, PMID: doi:10.4014/jmb.2404.04018
  36. Huang J., Hitchins A. D., Tran T. T., McCarron J. (2024 a). Bacteriological analytical manual chapter 23: methods for cosmetics. US Food Drug Admin.
  37. Hui C., Guo Y., Zhu D., Li L., Yi J., Zhang N. (2022). Metabolic engineering of the violacein biosynthetic pathway toward a low-cost, minimal-equipment lead biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 214, 114531. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.bios.2022.114531
  38. Kalra R., Conlan X. A., Goel M. (2020). Fungi as a potential source of pigments: harnessing filamentous fungi. Front. Chem. 8, 369., PMID:
  39. Kanzy H. M., Nasr N. F., El-Shazly H. A., Barakat O. S. (2015). Optimization of carotenoids production by yeast strains of Rhodotorula using salted cheese whey. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 4, 456 – 469.
  40. Kaur P., Ghoshal G., Jain A. (2019). Bio-utilization of fruits and vegetables waste to produce β-carotene in solid-state fermentation: Characterization and antioxidant activity. Proc. Biochem. 76, 155 – 164. doi: doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2018.10.007
  41. Kharkhota M., Hrabova H., Kharchuk M., Ivanytsia T., Mozhaieva L., Poliakova A.. (2022). Chromogenicity of aerobic spore-forming bacteria of the Bacillaceae family isolated from different ecological niches and physiographic zones. Braz. J. Microbiol. 53 (3), 1395 – 1408., PMID:
  42. Kiki M. J. (2023). Biopigments of microbial origin and their application in the cosmetic industry. Cosmetics 10, 47. doi: doi:10.3390/cosmetics10020047
  43. Kim S. K., Han G. H., Seong W., Kim H., Kim S.-W., Lee D.-H.. (2016). CRISPR interference-guided balancing of a biosynthetic mevalonate pathway increases terpenoid production. Metab. Eng. 38, 228 – 240. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2016.08.006
  44. Kim N. Y., Yim T. B., Lee H. Y. (2015). Skin anti-aging activities of bacteriochlorophyll a from photosynthetic bacteria, Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 1589 – 1598. doi:, PMID: doi:10.4014/jmb.1503.03080
  45. Kot A. M., Błażejak S., Kieliszek M., Gientka I., Piwowarek K., Brzezińska R. (2020). Production of lipids and carotenoids by Rhodotorula gracilis ATCC 10788 yeast in a bioreactor using low-cost wastes. Biocat. Agric. Biotechnol. 26, 101634. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101634
  46. Kothari V., Sharma S., Padia D. (2017). Recent research advances on Chromobacterium violaceum. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 10, 744 – 752. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.apjtm.2017.07.022
  47. Krishna Moorthy A., Govindarajan Rathi B., Shukla S. P., Kumar K., Shree Bharti V. (2021). Acute toxicity of textile dye Methylene blue on growth and metabolism of selected freshwater microalgae. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 82, 103552. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.etap.2020.103552
  48. Kumar V., Darnal S., Kumar S., Kumar S., Singh D. (2021). Bioprocess for co-production of polyhydroxybutyrate and violacein using Himalayan bacterium Iodobacter sp. PCH194. Bioresour. Technol. 319, 124235. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124235
  49. Kumar S., Kumar V., Ambika, Nag D., Kumar V., Darnal S.. (2022). Microbial pigments: learning from the Himalayan perspective to industrial applications. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49, kuac017. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1093/jimb/kuac017
  50. Kushwaha K., Saxena J., Tripathi B. K., Agarwal M. K. (2014). Detection of carotenoids in psychrotrophic bacteria by spectroscopic approach. J. BioSci. Biotechnol. 3, 253 – 260. Available online at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=13146238&AN=101563908&h=9CtVI0oz%2FC5Q400lAill8iVjGFfjqaRi%2BXmvciwPA4IZVtcJfMn1WOsDAEACDPOvN865iCOd%2Fk4NS%2B7BNzCMnA%3D%3D&crl=c (November 12, 2025).
  51. Kusmita L., Mutmainah N. F. N., Sabdono A., Trianto A., Radjasa O. K., Pangestuti R. (2021). Characteristic evaluation of various formulations of anti-aging cream from carotenoid extract of bacterial symbiont virgibacillus salarius strain 19.PP.Sc1.6. Cosmetics 8, 120. doi: doi:10.3390/cosmetics8040120
  52. Lee P., Schmidt-Dannert C. (2002). Metabolic engineering towards biotechnological production of carotenoids in microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60, 1 – 11. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1101-x
  53. Li Y., Zhao Y., Zhang H., Ding Z., Han J. (2024). The application of natural carotenoids in multiple fields and their encapsulation technology: A review. Molecules 29, 967. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/molecules29050967
  54. Liu J. K. (2022). Natural products in cosmetics. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 12 (1), 40.
  55. Liu Z., Feist A. M., Dragone G., Mussatto S. I. (2020). Lipid and carotenoid production from wheat straw hydrolysates by different oleaginous yeasts. J. Clean. Prod. 249, 119308. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119308
  56. Liu Q., Liu H.-C., Zhou Y.-G., Xin Y.-H. (2019). Microevolution and adaptive strategy of psychrophilic species Flavobacterium bomense sp. nov. isolated from glaciers. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1069. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01069
  57. Liu G. Y., Nizet V. (2009). Color me bad: microbial pigments as virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 17, 406 – 413. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.tim.2009.06.006
  58. López G.-D., Álvarez-Rivera G., Carazzone C., Ibáñez E., Leidy C., Cifuentes A. (2023). Bacterial carotenoids: extraction, characterization, and applications. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 53, 1239 – 1262. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1080/10408347.2021.2016366
  59. Lu Y., Wang L., Xue Y., Zhang C., Xing X.-H., Lou K.. (2009). Production of violet pigment by a newly isolated psychrotrophic bacterium from a glacier in Xinjiang, China. Biochem. Eng. J. 43, 135 – 141. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bej.2008.09.009
  60. Lyakhovchenko N. S., Efimova V. A., Seliverstov E. S., Anis’ kov A. A., Solyanikova I. P. (2024). Bacteriostatic Activity of Janthinobacterium lividum and Purified Violacein Fraction against Clavibacter michiganensis. Processes 12, 1116. doi: doi:10.3390/pr12061116
  61. Mandal D. D., Majumdar S. (2023). Bacteria as biofactory of pigments: Evolution beyond therapeutics and biotechnological advancements. J. BioSci. BioEng. 135, 349 – 358. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2023.01.008
  62. Mary P. A. T., Gayathri K. V., Kumar P. S., Rajagopal R., Kavitha R., Kumar. S U.. (2024). Biosynthesis of bioactive pigment from halotolerant Bacillus cereus for fabric – an eco-friendly initiative. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 25479 – 25493. doi: doi:10.1007/s13399-023-04729-1
  63. Mehta H., Jimenez J., Ledesma-Amaro R., Stan G.-B. (2025). Investigating the potential of division of labor in synthetic bacterial communities for the production of violacein. ACS Synth. Biol. 14, 2703 – 2709. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5c00120
  64. Mendes-Silva T. d. C. D., da Silva Andrade R. F., Ootani M. A., Mendes P. V. D., da Silva M. R. F., Souza K. S.. (2020). Biotechnological potential of carotenoids produced by extremophilic microorganisms and application prospects for the cosmetics industry. Adv. Microbiol. 10 (8), 397.
  65. Moura-Alves P., Faé K., Houthuys E., Dorhoi A., Kreuchwig A., Furkert J.. (2014). AhR sensing of bacterial pigments regulates antibacterial defence. Nature 512, 387 – 392. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1038/nature13684
  66. Naik R., Gupte S. (2024). Characterization of pigment produced by high carotenoid yielding bacteria Paracoccus marcusii RSPO1 and evaluation of its anti-diabetic, anti-microbial and antioxidant properties. Natural Prod, Res. 38, 968 – 977. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1080/14786419.2023.2208358
  67. Nainangu P. K.,. K., Subramanian K., Gopal S., Antonyraj A. P. M. (2025). Characterization of bioactive metabolites in phormidium sp. PB21: pigment production, antimicrobial potential, and toxicity assessment. Chem. Biodivers. 22, e202403415. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1002/cbdv.202403415
  68. Numan M., Bashir S., Mumtaz R., Tayyab S., Rehman N. U., Khan A. L.. (2018). Therapeutic applications of bacterial pigments: a review of current status and future opportunities. 3. Biotech. 8, 207. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s13205-018-1227-x
  69. Orlandi V. T., Martegani E., Giaroni C., Baj A., Bolognese F. (2022). Bacterial pigments: A colorful palette reservoir for biotechnological applications. Biotech. App. Biochem. 69, 981 – 1001. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1002/bab.2170
  70. Padhan B., Poddar K., Sarkar D., Sarkar A. (2021). Production, purification, and process optimization of intracellular pigment from novel psychrotolerant Paenibacillus sp. BPW19. Biotechnol. Rep. 29, e00592. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00592
  71. Pagels F., Almeida C., Vasconcelos V., Guedes A. C. (2022). Cosmetic potential of pigments extracts from the marine cyanobacterium Cyanobium sp. Mar. Drugs 20 (8), 481., PMID:
  72. Pan X., You J., Tang M., Zhang X., Xu M., Yang T.. (2022). Improving prodigiosin production by transcription factor engineering and promoter engineering in Serratia marcescens. Front. Microbiol. 13, 977337. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.977337
  73. Panwar A. S., Molpa D., Joshi G. K. (2019). Biotechnological potential of some cold-adapted bacteria isolated from north-western himalaya. Microbiology 88, 343 – 352. doi: doi:10.1134/S002626171903007X
  74. Patki J. M., Singh S., Singh S., Padmadas N., Dasgupta D. (2021). Analysis of the applicative potential of pigments extracted from bacterial isolates of mangrove soil as topical UV protectants. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 57, e19127. doi: doi:10.1590/s2175-97902020000419127
  75. Patthawaro S., Lomthaisong K., Saejung C. (2020). Bioconversion of agro-industrial waste to value-added product lycopene by photosynthetic bacterium rhodopseudomonas faecalis and its carotenoid composition. Waste. Biomass Valor. 11, 2375 – 2386. doi: doi:10.1007/s12649-018-00571-z
  76. Pavan M. E., López N. I., Pettinari M. J. (2020). Melanin biosynthesis in bacteria, regulation and production perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 1357 – 1370. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s00253-019-10245-y
  77. Poddar K., Padhan B., Sarkar D., Sarkar A. (2021). Purification and optimization of pink pigment produced by newly isolated bacterial strain Enterobacter sp. PWN1. SN. Appl. Sci. 3, 105. doi: doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04146-x
  78. Pollock S., Taylor S., Oyerinde O., Nurmohamed S., Dlova N., Sarkar R.. (2021). The dark side of skin lightening: An international collaboration and review of a public health issue affecting dermatology. Int. J. Womens Dermatol. 7 (2), 158 – 164., PMID:
  79. Qiang S., Su A. P., Li Y., Chen Z., Hu C. Y., Meng Y. H. (2019). Elevated β-carotene synthesis by the engineered rhodobacter sp haeroides with enhanced crtY expression. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 9560 – 9568. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02597
  80. Rajendran P., Somasundaram P., Dufossé L. (2023). Microbial pigments: Eco-friendly extraction techniques and some industrial applications. J. Mol. Struct. 1290, 135958. doi: doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135958
  81. Ramesh C., Vinithkumar N. V., Kirubagaran R., Venil C. K., Dufossé L. (2019). Multifaceted applications of microbial pigments: current knowledge, challenges and future directions for public health implications. Microorganisms 7, 186. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms7070186
  82. Rather L. J., Mir S. S., Ganie S. A., Li Q. (2023). Research progress, challenges, and perspectives in microbial pigment production for industrial applications—A review. Dyes Pigments 210, 110989.
  83. Reddy G. S. N., Prabagaran S. R., Shivaji S. (2008). Leifsonia pindariensis sp. nov., isolated from the Pindari glacier of the Indian Himalayas, and emended description of the genus Leifsonia. Int. J. System. evol. Microbiol. 58, 2229 – 2234. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1099/ijs.0.65715-0
  84. Resende D. I., Ferreira M., Magalhães C., Lobo J. S., Sousa E., Almeida I. F. (2021). Trends in the use of marine ingredients in anti-aging cosmetics. Algal Res. 55, 102273.
  85. Salman A., Dhanashree B., Kotian H. (2025). Antimicrobial effect of common bacterial pigments on clinically significant microorganisms. Scientifica 2025, 3951925. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1155/sci5/3951925
  86. Sengupta S., Bhowal J. (2023). Characterization of a blue-green pigment extracted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its application in textile and paper dyeing. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 30, 30343 – 30357. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24241-9
  87. Sharma R., Ghoshal G. (2020). Optimization of carotenoids production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MTCC-1403) using agro-industrial waste in bioreactor: A statistical approach. Biotechnol. Rep. 25, e00407. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00407
  88. Shen L., Liu Y., Wang N., Jiao N., Xu B., Liu X. (2018). Variation with depth of the abundance, diversity and pigmentation of culturable bacteria in a deep ice core from the Yuzhufeng Glacier, Tibetan Plateau. Extremophiles 22, 29 – 38. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s00792-017-0973-8
  89. Shen L., Yao T., Xu B., Wang H., Jiao N., Kang S.. (2012). Variation of culturable bacteria along depth in the East Rongbuk ice core, Mt. Everest. Geosci. Front. 3, 327 – 334. doi: doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2011.12.013
  90. Shrestha P., Kim B., Han S.-R., Lee H., Oh T.-J. (2025). Unraveling the genetic mechanisms of UV radiation resistance in Bacillus through biofilm formation, sporulation, and carotenoid production. Genomics 117, 111066. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2025.111066
  91. Siezen R. J. (2011). Microbial sunscreens. Microbial. Biotechnol. 4, 1. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00241.x
  92. Simsek Geyik M., Efe D., Gormez A. (2025). Identification of bacteria producing red pigments and their application in the textile industry. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 50, 6221 – 6230. doi: doi:10.1007/s13369-024-09290-1
  93. Sinha S., Choubey S., Kumar A. A., Bhosale P. (2017). Identification, characterization of pigment producing bacteria from soil and water and testing of antimicrobial activity of bacterial pigments. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 42, 119 – 124.
  94. Sinha S., Singh G., Arora A., Paul D. (2021). Carotenoid production by red yeast isolates grown in agricultural and “Mandi” Waste. Waste. Biomass Valor. 12, 3939 – 3949. doi: doi:10.1007/s12649-020-01288-8
  95. Singh S., Nimse S. B., Mathew D. E., Dhimmar A., Sahastrabudhe H.. (2021). Microbial melanin: Recent advances in biosynthesis, extraction, characterization, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 53, 107773., PMID:
  96. Souto E. B., Fernandes A. R., Martins-Gomes C., Coutinho T. E., Durazzo A., Lucarini M.. (2020). Nanomaterials for skin delivery of cosmeceuticals and pharmaceuticals. Appl. Sci. 10, 1594. doi: doi:10.3390/app10051594
  97. Srivastava A., Rani R. M., Patle D. S., Kumar S. (2022). Emerging bioremediation technologies for the treatment of textile wastewater containing synthetic dyes: a comprehensive review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 97, 26 – 41. doi: doi:10.1002/jctb.6891
  98. Sudarshan S., Harikrishnan S., RathiBhuvaneswari G., Alamelu V., Aanand S., Rajasekar A.. (2023). Impact of textile dyes on human health and bioremediation of textile industry effluent using microorganisms: current status and future prospects. J. Appl. Microbiol. 134, lxac064. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1093/jambio/lxac064
  99. Sundar R., Sivaperumal P. (2022). Melanin pigments from sediment-associated Nocardiopsis sp. marine actinobacterium and antibacterial potential. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 13, S88. doi:, PMID: doi:10.4103/japtr.japtr_339_22
  100. Suryawanshi R. K., Patil C. D., Borase H. P., Narkhede C. P., Stevenson A., Hallsworth J. E.. (2015). Towards an understanding of bacterial metabolites prodigiosin and violacein and their potential for use in commercial sunscreens. Intern. J. Cos. Sci. 37, 98 – 107. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1111/ics.12175
  101. Terao J. (2023). Revisiting carotenoids as dietary antioxidants for human health and disease prevention. Food Funct. 14 (17), 7799 – 7824., PMID:
  102. Thakur M., Tandon D., Bhardwaj S., Gautam N. (2025). “ Bioprocessing of biocolors for large-scale production,” in Biocolours. Eds. Bhatia R. K., Walia A. (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore), 169 – 186. doi: doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1738-1_8
  103. Vadali R. V., Fu Y., Bennett G. N., San K.-Y. (2005). Enhanced lycopene productivity by manipulation of carbon flow to isopentenyl diphosphate in escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Prog. 21, 1558 – 1561. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1021/bp050124l
  104. Venil C. K., Aruldass C. A., Dufossé L., Zakaria Z. A., Ahmad W. A. (2014). Current perspective on bacterial pigments: emerging sustainable compounds with coloring and biological properties for the industry–an incisive evaluation. RSC. Adv. 4, 39523 – 39529. doi: doi:10.1039/C4RA06162D
  105. Venil C. K., Dufossé L., Renuka Devi P. (2020). Bacterial pigments: sustainable compounds with market potential for pharma and food industry. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 100. doi: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00100
  106. Venil C. K., Zakaria Z. A., Ahmad W. A. (2013). Bacterial pigments and their applications. Proc. Biochem. 48, 1065 – 1079. doi: doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2013.06.006
  107. Vieira M. V., Pastrana L. M., Fuciños P. (2020). Microalgae encapsulation systems for food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics applications. Mar. Drugs 18, 644. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/md18120644
  108. Wang G.-Y., Keasling J. D. (2002). Amplification of HMG-CoA reductase production enhances carotenoid accumulation in Neurospora crassa. Metab. Eng. 4, 193 – 201. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1006/mben.2002.0225
  109. Wang Y., Liu J., Yi Y., Zhu L., Liu M., Zhang Z.. (2024). Insights into the synthesis, engineering, and functions of microbial pigments in Deinococcus bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 15. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1447785
  110. Wang J., Xiong Z., Li S., Wang Y. (2015). Exploiting exogenous MEP pathway genes to improve the downstream isoprenoid pathway effects and enhance isoprenoid production in Escherichia coli. Proc. Biochem. 50, 24 – 32. doi: doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2014.10.022
  111. Wijesekara T., Xu B. (2024). A critical review on the stability of natural food pigments and stabilization techniques. Food Res. Int. 179, 114011., PMID:
  112. Williams R. P. (1973). Biosynthesis of prodigiosin, a secondary metabolite of serratia marcescens. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 396 – 402. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1128/am.25.3.396-402.1973
  113. Xinrui D., Bo L., Yihong B., Weifeng L., Yong T. (2023). Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for high-level production of violaxanthin. Microb. Cell Fact. 22, 1 – 11. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02098-y
  114. Yamano S., Ishii T., Nakagawa M., Ikenaga H., Misawa N. (1994). Metabolic engineering for production of β-carotene and lycopene in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58, 1112 – 1114. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1271/bbb.58.1112
  115. Yang J., Guo L. (2014). Biosynthesis of β-carotene in engineered E. coli using the MEP and MVA pathways. Microb. Cell Fact. 13, 160. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1186/s12934-014-0160-x
  116. Yarkent Ç., Gürlek C., Oncel S. S. (2020). Potential of microalgal compounds in trending natural cosmetics: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 17, 100304.
  117. Yolmeh M. (2016). Antimicrobial activity of pigments extracted from Rhodotorula glutinis against some bacteria and fungi. Available online at: https://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/NFM88720161205.pdf (Accessed November 12, 2025).
  118. Yusuf M., Shabbir M., Mohammad F. (2017). Natural colorants: historical, processing and sustainable prospects. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 7, 123 – 145. doi:, PMID: doi:10.1007/s13659-017-0119-9
  119. Zhang R., Chen J., Mao X., Qi P., Zhang X. (2019). Anti-inflammatory and anti-aging evaluation of pigment–protein complex extracted from chlorella pyrenoidosa. Mar. Drugs 17, 586. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/md17100586
  120. Zhang H., Fu R., Zheng Q., Song X., Wu J., Ren Y. (2024). Continuous mode of color and functionality construction for cotton by bacterial pigment based on nano-suspension system. Ind. Crops Prod. 214, 118510. doi: doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118510

Citation

Chakraborty, P., et al. (2026). Bacterial pigments as sustainable and functional colorants in cosmetic applications: advances and prospects. Frontiers in Bacteriology, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
5 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Chakraborty, Kaur, Thazeem, Thomas, S and Sharma.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Deepak Sharma

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0