Skip to content

Perspective

Frontiers in Climate ·

Volume 8 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1941538

Measuring large-scale mCDR using a novel Atmospheric CO₂ Perimeter Flux (ACPF) method

  • Peter Fiekowsky1
  • Akhilesh Vijay1*corresponding author
  • Anoohya Jami1
  1. Climate Restoration Alliance, Los Altos, CA, United States
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Achieving net-zero CO₂ emissions globally requires an annual removal of on the order of 7–9 Gt CO₂; but current CO₂ removal (CDR) measurement methodologies are not designed to quantify marine CDR (mCDR) at the megaton-to-gigaton scales required for climate relevance. This perspective presents a new methodology, the Atmospheric CO₂ Perimeter Flux (ACPF) method, an atmospheric-domain framework for the monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of marine carbon dioxide removal. ACPF relies on a network of autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) that monitor CO₂ concentration and wind vector in the well-mixed marine boundary layer (MBL) above the mCDR region. The sensors integrate net CO₂ mass flux in the MBL across the perimeter in tonnes per hour. Paired upwind and downwind ASVs track the sampled air mass, suppressing synoptic-scale CO₂ variability common to both ends of the transect. The difference between upwind and downwind CO 2 values can be converted into XCO₂ difference values comparable to satellite retrievals. The framework constrains net surface exchange over the enclosed region without ocean-interior observations or a biological-pump model. Attributing that exchange to an intervention requires a baseline obtained by the same array, over the same region. The magnitude of the signal that ACPF must resolve is assessed against the surface CO₂ depletion implied by the post-Pinatubo atmospheric anomaly. The ACPF architecture applies to any bounded mCDR intervention that generates a measurable surface CO₂ depletion at the megaton-to-gigaton-per-year scale required by today’s net-zero commitments.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Achieving Paris Agreement net-zero CO₂ emissions by 2050, consistent with IPCC pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C (SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6), requires CO₂ removal (CDR) at 7–9 Gt CO₂ per year by mid-century (IPCC, 2022; Smith et al., 2024). The current global CDR rate is approximately 2 Gt CO₂ yr−1, dominated by land-based approaches whose potential is constrained to 3–5 Gt CO₂ yr−1 by finite land availability, soil carbon saturation and permanence insufficient to meet the mid-century target (Smith et al., 2024; Fuss et al., 2018; Deprez et al., 2024).

Marine CDR naturally complements land-based efforts. The ocean already absorbs 10.6 Gt of CO₂ annually and stores approximately 38,000 Gt C as dissolved inorganic carbon, roughly 44 times the atmospheric pool, providing significant leverage for deliberate mCDR (Ciais et al., 2013; Friedlingstein et al., 2025). The ocean’s capacity to absorb additional CO₂ through carbonate equilibria at the planetary scale makes it the largest reservoir available to address the deficit that land-based approaches alone cannot meet. Actively investigated mCDR approaches, including ocean iron fertilization, ocean alkalinity enhancement, macroalgae cultivation and sinking, electrochemical seawater CO₂ removal and coastal ecosystem restoration, collectively exhibit theoretical gigaton-scale potential (Boyd et al., 2007; Renforth and Henderson, 2017; NASEM, 2022; Oschlies et al., 2025; Ward et al., 2025; Hooper et al., 2025). Realizing it requires a scalable, independent MRV framework at the megaton-to-gigaton scale. Whether existing methodologies can meet that requirement remains unresolved [Fennel, 2026; Oschlies et al., 2025; European Marine Board (EMB), 2025].

Current mCDR MRV relies on three ocean-domain approaches, each constrained at that scale. First, surface-ocean pCO₂ monitoring estimates air–sea flux using an empirical gas-transfer parameterization that carries at least a 25% uncertainty (Wanninkhof et al., 2009; Doney et al., 2024; Ward et al., 2025). Second, dissolved inorganic carbon and alkalinity budgeting, the most direct accounting variables, are analytically demanding and prone to drift and biofouling, and even dense autonomous arrays can underestimate net carbonate-system change by 35–55% in realistic conditions (Ward et al., 2025; Bach et al., 2024). Biological pump here encompasses both biological and chemical processes, tracked by sediment traps, thorium-234 profiling, and biogeochemical Argo floats, which monitor particulate organic carbon export to depth, but not net atmospheric removal, and trap efficiency and lateral advection remain poorly constrained (Boyd et al., 2019; Buesseler et al., 2024). All three require an estimate of what the ocean sink would have been without the intervention. Because ocean carbon dynamics are nonlinear, that estimate is model-derived, and at megaton scales, its uncertainty can approach the removal signal itself (Fennel, 2026; Ito and Reinhard, 2025; Oschlies et al., 2025).

Given these limitations, the atmosphere offers a more directly integrated measurement domain. The marine boundary layer (MBL), the lowest 0.5–2 km over the ocean, integrates net surface CO₂ exchange across the underlying region into a spatially coherent field, well mixed vertically on timescales of 10–30 min by wind-driven turbulence (Stull, 1988). Exploiting this well-mixed property of the MBL, we present the Atmospheric CO₂ Perimeter Flux (ACPF) method, an MRV framework for marine CDR. ACPF employs CO₂ sensor ASVs with wind-vector measurements around the perimeter of a bounded ocean intervention region and quantifies the net CO₂ mass flux entering and leaving the marine boundary layer across that perimeter and across the capping inversion. We derive a conversion factor that enables comparison of ASV-measured depletion with that from satellite XCO₂ data. Establishing that a drawdown is additional requires a baseline that sets out the design by which it is obtained from the same or similar instruments, over the same region.

2 MRV gap: the Atmospheric CO₂ Perimeter Flux (ACPF) method

2.1 Measurement principle and conceptual framework

No previous MRV methodology verifies ocean-based removal of atmospheric carbon at megaton-to-gigaton scales. ACPF shifts the measurement domain from ocean to atmosphere, quantifying net surface atmospheric CO₂ drawdown over a bounded ocean region rather than tracking carbon through the ocean’s biological pump. Any net carbon removal proportionately reduces the CO₂ mixing ratio within the overlying MBL. The differential architecture compares upwind ambient readings with later readings of the same downwind, depleted sampled air mass. This removes synoptic-scale CO₂ variations from the difference. A network of self-stationing CO₂ sensors surrounds the intervention area, with upwind sensors recording ambient CO₂ and downwind sensors recording depleted air leaving the area (Figure 1). The control volume is a slab of air within the MBL, capped by the trade-wind inversion and bounded laterally by the sensor ring. As an air mass enters one side, transits the intervention region, and exits the other, the method quantifies the resulting change in CO₂ concentration across those boundaries. This measurement architecture is particularly well-suited to warm trade-wind regions. Virtually all ocean nitrogen fixation occurs in warm trade-wind regions with sufficient iron (Stal, 2009), likely allowing multi-gigaton CO2 removal as may have occurred following the Mt. Pinatubo eruption. Steady trade-wind flow keeps direction and speed generally constant across the perimeter, so relatively few sensors are required. The quantity constrained is the net surface CO₂ flux integrated over the enclosed region during the transit of the sampled air mass, not the intervention-induced removal itself. We therefore distinguish three quantities. Fnet is the total net air–sea CO₂ flux over the enclosed region. Fnat is the flux that would have occurred over the same region during the same period in the absence of intervention. Fadd is the additional removal, Fadd = Fnet − Fnat. ACPF constrains Fnet directly. Recovering Fadd requires attribution, and attribution requires a baseline. The claim made here is therefore narrower than the claim of model independence. ACPF replaces a counterfactual on carbon export through the ocean interior, which can only be simulated, with one on surface CO₂ flux, measurable by the same array in the same units over the same region.

Conceptual diagram of the ACPF sensor array. Self-stationing CO₂ sensor autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) are deployed uniformly around the perimeter of the mCDR intervention region. Upwind sensors record ambient CO₂ entering the region; downwind sensors record CO₂-depleted air leaving it. Wind arrows indicate the mean flow direction. The well-mixed marine boundary layer column of height *H**MBL* is shaded. The net perimeter flux, the integral of the CO₂ mass-flux difference around the entire boundary, gives the total atmospheric removal rate in tonnes per hour.
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of the ACPF sensor array. Self-stationing CO₂ sensor autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) are deployed uniformly around the perimeter of the mCDR intervention region. Upwind sensors record ambient CO₂ entering the region; downwind sensors record CO₂-depleted air leaving it. Wind arrows indicate the mean flow direction. The well-mixed marine boundary layer column of height HMBL is shaded. The net perimeter flux, the integral of the CO₂ mass-flux difference around the entire boundary, gives the total atmospheric removal rate in tonnes per hour.

2.2 Baseline and attribution design

Additionality is established by experimental design rather than measurement alone and requires three observational elements.

First, a regional baseline. The array is deployed over the intervention region for a full seasonal cycle before intervention. This establishes the mean and variance of Fnat under the instrument, geometry, and units that are later applied to the intervention. While individual eddies typically last several months (Chelton et al., 2011), similar eddies in a region can be tested, providing appropriate statistics. Low costs of autonomous surface vehicles permit baseline durations that are impractical for ship campaigns.

Second, a concurrent untreated reference region. A second anticyclonic eddy matched in sea surface temperature, mixed-layer depth, surface pCO₂ and chlorophyll is instrumented in parallel, and the additional removal is given by Equation 1:

F add = ( F T , post − F R , post ) − ( F T , pre − F R , pre ) (1)

for treated region T and reference region R. The reference term removes seasonal stratification change, regional advective gradients and shared synoptic variability; the pre-period difference removes the persistent offset between the two.

Third, measurement continued through relaxation. Bloom senescence and remineralization return CO₂ to the surface over weeks to months, so the post-intervention window is the recovery limb, not an unperturbed reference. It is included within the reported integral, so that Fadd is quantified over the full perturbation and relaxation cycle rather than at peak drawdown, with the measurement period set by the observed flattening of the cumulative flux curve rather than by a prior bloom model.

An intervention is quantifiable when its areal removal rate exceeds three times the standard deviation of the regional natural flux measured over the preceding baseline season. Interventions below this threshold are not verifiable by perimeter flux alone, whatever the instrument precision. Perimeter flux is agnostic to the origin of the CO₂ crossing it, so non-marine contributions are excluded by co-measurement rather than by the mass balance.

2.3 Marine boundary layer: physical basis

The MBL is maintained in a well-mixed state by wind-driven turbulence, with an overlying temperature inversion that limits exchange with the free troposphere. Turbulent eddies recycle air between the surface and the inversion on timescales of 10–30 min (Stull, 1988; Wood, 2012). A downwind-edge measurement represents the vertically averaged MBL mixing ratio over the past 10–30 min upwind.

MBL height is typically 1.4 km in trade-wind conditions, comprising a 1.3 km base (Bellon and Stevens, 2012; Nuijens and Stevens, 2012; Carrillo et al., 2016) with entrainment deepening (Wood and Bretherton, 2004; Wood, 2012). The corresponding inversion pressure is 866 mbar in the ICAO Standard Atmosphere. Height varies substantially by region and time of day and is 0.85 km over a planned pilot region off the western coast of Mexico during the OCO-2/3 observations. Forecasts and measurements are available from the Global Forecast System. These must be verified periodically by aircraft or radiosonde. The free troposphere above the inversion retains air near its original CO₂ content, entrained into the MBL at the rate.where we is the entrainment velocity (m s−1) and HMBL is MBL height (m). For subtropical and trade-wind regions, Wood and Bretherton (2004) report we ≈ 4 mm s−1, giving Kentr ≈ 1.0% per hour. Over the approximately five-hour transit of a parcel across a 100 km region at 20 km h−1, about 5% of the MBL column is exchanged with the undepleted free troposphere. Reported entrainment velocities vary by about a factor of two, so the correction carries an uncertainty near ±50% of its magnitude. This term is carried throughout as an explicit bounded correction of that magnitude and is not treated as negligible.

K entr = w e / H MBL (2)

2.4 Control-volume formulation and uncertainty budget

The governing relation is a conservation statement for the control volume bounded laterally by the sensor perimeter, below by the sea surface and above by the MBL inversion. Taking C as the CO₂ mass within that volume, conservation is expressed by Equation 3:where Fadv is net horizontal advective flux, Fentr is vertical exchange at the MBL top, and Fsurf is the air–sea flux to be recovered. Storage variation arises from synoptic-scale variations in ambient CO₂. These are subtracted out by comparing delayed measurements of the same airmass or by long-term averaging downwind. CO₂ variations from the air-sea flux are integrated as the air mass blows across the downwind sensors. Accurate measurements must sum CO₂ differences over a period at least as long as the transit time of an airmass across the intervention region.

∂ C / ∂ t = F adv + F entr + F surf (3)

The advective term is the product of wind speed, perpendicular wind component, MBL height, sensor spacing and air density, applied to the CO₂ mole-fraction difference and summed around the perimeter to give the removal rate in tonnes per hour. The calculation is carried out in molar units, the molar-mass ratio (1.52) applied within the flux expression, so no separate mass-fraction unit is required. Each downwind reading is differenced against the corresponding upwind reading, reducing the influence of ambient CO₂ variability.

2.5 Surface-to-column conversion: the R-factor

Surface ASVs measure the local depletion in mixing ratio (ΔCO₂, surf, ppmv). Satellites, including OCO-2/3, GOSAT and CO₂M, report the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction XCO₂ (Kuze et al., 2009; Eldering et al., 2017; Suto et al., 2021; Sierk et al., 2021), and the R-factor relates the twoTreating the atmosphere as two layers, the well-mixed MBL and a free troposphere retaining background CO₂, and taking the depletion as uniform within the MBL up to typically 866 mbar, the column anomaly is the surface anomaly diluted by the ratio of MBL column mass to total column mass:

R = ΔCO ₂ , surf / Δ XCO ₂ .

R = P surface / ( P surface − P MBL , top ) = 1013 / ( 1013 − 866 ) ≈ 6.9 (4)

The MBL column holds approximately 14.5% of atmospheric mass, so a surface depletion of 6.9 ppmv gives a column anomaly near 1 ppm XCO₂. R depends on the inversion height and is evaluated for each site rather than adopted as a constant, rising to near 10 over the shallower 0.85 km inversion of the planned pilot region. The depth dependence governs the surface depletion that an array must resolve, but not the column anomaly, since for a fixed removal, the swept air mass and R scale with layer depth in opposite senses and cancel. Equation 4 is a first-order slab estimate rather than a universal physical conversion. It assumes uniform depletion throughout the MBL and corrects the surface CO2 values to dry-air mole fraction, a correction that is typically less than 5%. R should be used as an order-of-magnitude scaling until calibration measurements are available.

Satellite measurements upwind and downwind yield ambient and depleted XCO₂, whose difference cross-checks the ASV mass balance. For OCO-2 and OCO-3, single-sounding uncertainties after quality filtering and bias correction are approximately 1 ppm over land and 0.7 ppm over ocean glint (Taylor et al., 2023), consistent with the single-sounding random errors of 0.5–1 ppm reported for OCO-2 (Eldering et al., 2017), and CO₂M targets below 0.7 ppm (Sierk et al., 2021). Single-sounding precision is a necessary but not sufficient condition for detection. Spatial sampling, cloud screening, systematic retrieval bias, and background gradients also govern whether a coherent anomaly is resolvable, so thresholds should be set based on aggregated soundings rather than single-sounding precision.

3 Signal magnitude: a historical natural analogue

Atmospheric CO₂ growth slowed following the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption, with concentrations stabilizing and then remaining approximately 2.25 ppm below levels projected from emissions through today (Fiekowsky and Burnham, 2025). Fay et al. (2023) isolate the ocean response to the volcanic forcing in a large-ensemble Earth system model and report an air–sea CO₂ flux anomaly of −0.29 ± 0.14 Pg C yr−1 in 1992 and an increase of 0.53 Pg C in upper-ocean dissolved inorganic carbon by 1993. They attribute that part of the carbon anomaly principally to changes in solubility and eruption-generated El Niño–Southern Oscillation variability. We use the Pinatubo episode solely to establish the order of magnitude of the surface signal that an ACPF array must resolve. We calculate an illustrative removal of 18 Gt CO₂ over 20 months across a region 600 km wide orthogonal to a mean wind of 18 km h−1 (Haeckel et al., 2001), with an effective boundary-layer height of 2.0 km, which includes entrainment mixing. This sweeps air with a mass of 3.7 × 1014 t, implying an average, not instantaneous, mole-fraction depletion near 32 ppmv over the period. Because R depends on layer depth, it is evaluated at the 2.0 km height used here (Huang and Mao, 2015). In the ICAO Standard Atmosphere, 2.0 km corresponds to 795 mbar, yielding R = 1013/(1013 − 795) ≈ 4.6 and a column anomaly of near 6.9 ppm, well above the sensor detection threshold of 0.5–0.7 ppm. An intervention an order of magnitude smaller would still yield a surface depletion near 3 ppmv, the conclusion relevant to ACPF design.

4 Discussion

4.1 Applicability across mCDR approaches

ACPF applies to any mCDR intervention producing net atmospheric CO₂ removal over a bounded, persistent region, subject to two conditions. The surface depletion must exceed the sensor threshold of roughly 0.5–0.7 ppm, and the removal rate must exceed three times the standard deviation of the regional natural flux measured over the preceding baseline season. For high-rate approaches such as ocean iron fertilization within mesoscale eddies, both conditions are met comfortably at the scales considered here. For lower-rate approaches such as open-ocean alkalinity enhancement, detectability improves with increased sensor density, deployment in semi-enclosed seas, or larger intervention areas.

4.2 Relationship to ocean-domain MRV

ACPF constrains a different quantity in a different domain from ocean-based MRV and can be complementary to it rather than a replacement. Its distinguishing features are a mass balance that requires no biological-pump model, an independent satellite cross-check via the R-factor, and continuous monitoring without ship surveys. It carries its own uncertainties (Table 1), and the combined 25–30% is not by itself smaller than the 25% inherent in gas-transfer parameterization or the 35–55% reported for dense carbonate arrays. The stronger case is joint deployment: atmospheric perimeter flux constraining net surface exchange, while ocean-domain observations detail the fate of carbon over time. Atmospheric flux measurement has a terrestrial precedent in eddy covariance (Baldocchi, 2003, 2014), which ACPF extends to the ocean by resolving horizontal advective flux across a perimeter rather than vertical flux at a tower.

Table 1. Classification of control-volume terms and their contributions to the ACPF uncertainty budget.

TermTreatmentBasis and uncertainty contribution
Horizontal advective flux (Fadv)MeasuredASV CO₂ and wind vector. Wind speed ±5%; perimeter concentration difference ±0.5 ppm.
MBL height (HMBL)MeasuredRadiosonde or aircraft profiling of the inversion. ±15%.
Entrainment (Fentr)EstimatedEquation 2; ~5% of column mass per transit, with ±50% uncertainty on that term.
Storage (∂C/∂t)EstimatedASV time series; <5% under quasi-steady trade-wind flow.
Horizontal divergenceNeglected<5% where the wind field is spatially uniform across the perimeter; monitored and reported.
CombinedApproximately 25–30% for a single deployment, reducible by temporal averaging.

4.3 Limitations and the research agenda

This perspective sets out a measurement concept and the design required to test it, rather than a validated MRV method. Because several elements remain open, specific operational requirements are still being refined. For example, while wind fields for air–sea flux work is routinely taken from remote sensing or numerical weather models, with platform anemometers serving to validate rather than replace them (Wanninkhof et al., 2019). If the reanalysis and scatterometer winds prove adequate over the perimeter, the ASV specification and hence array cost can be reduced accordingly, though continuous coverage over the transit time remains a requirement that intermittent satellite passes do not meet.

A second open element is long-term durability. ACPF constrains atmospheric exchange during the measurement period but not afterwards. Predicting when sequestered carbon will return to the atmosphere would ordinarily draw on historical data such as analyses of CO₂-removing and non-removing eruptions, from the ice-age cycle, and from OIF tests showing both negligible and high-removal results, but these analyses are still in development. The durability of ice-age carbon removal is estimated at over 1,000 years and preliminary evidence from large eruptions indicates two eruption types: carbon-removing events, with decades-to-centuries durability, and non-carbon-removing, with no detectable atmospheric durability. Pending publication of historical data analyses, depth profiling of DIC, DOC and POC through the intervention volume can predict durability.

A third area of ongoing rather than demonstrated field performance. Furthermore, the surface-to-column factor is a slab estimate that does not account for the vertical sensitivity of the satellite retrieval. Because this sensitivity is lowest in the lowest kilometre, where the ACPF signal lies. The retrieved column anomaly may therefore be smaller than the slab estimate implies, and R requires calibration against measured profiles. Additionally, the attribution design has not been executed, and the magnitude and variability of the natural flux term in a candidate region are unmeasured.

These open elements are the reason for this Perspective. Historically, the verification of ocean-based removal has been constrained by the cost and impracticality of establishing counterfactuals in the ocean interior, where measurements are dispersed in three dimensions and cannot be readily sustained. By shifting the focus to the atmospheric boundary layer, this framework separates the measurement of climate-relevant atmospheric CO₂ removal from the underlying ocean science that explains it. This provides a domain where the counterfactual is reduced to a surface-flux baseline, which can be measured by the same low-cost autonomous array performing the intervention measurement. The degree to which a CO₂ reduction is sustained remains an empirical question, and prototype deployments currently underway are designed to answer it. We present this framework now so the community can examine the design before field results are reported, rather than after.

5 Conclusion

Ocean-domain MRV depends on model-simulated counterfactual baselines whose uncertainties can approach the removal signal at megaton scales. ACPF addresses this by shifting the measurement domain to the overlying atmosphere, which primarily influences Earth’s climate. By integrating the net CO₂ mass flux across a sensor perimeter that encloses the well-mixed MBL, ACPF constrains net surface exchange without a biological pump model. Its baseline is obtained by direct measurement over the same region, with the same array and in the same units, before and alongside the intervention. The R-factor provides a first-order scaling between surface and column anomalies, enabling a satellite cross-check. A historical analogue indicates that gigaton-scale removal generates surface depletions of order 32 ppmv, well above current detection thresholds. At a cost below USD 1 million per deployment, ACPF offers a scalable route to the MRV infrastructure that gigaton-scale marine CDR will require. The priorities for further work are a paired treatment-and-reference field trial, calibration of the surface-to-column conversion against measured vertical profiles and correlation of ACPF removal estimates with satellite XCO₂ retrievals and particulate organic carbon measurements.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Grammarly and Claude (Anthropic) to improve the language and style of the manuscript. After using these tools, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Isabel Maria Palma Aleixo Cabrita, Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente, Portugal

Reviewed by: Ting Gu, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, China

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Grandparents Fund for Climate Restoration (GFCR).

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

PF: Investigation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation, Software, Funding acquisition, Resources, Conceptualization, Validation, Project administration. AV: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. AJ: Formal analysis, Visualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Grandparents Fund for Climate Restoration of the Climate Restoration Alliance for supporting this research. We thank all reviewers for their valuable suggestions that significantly strengthened the manuscript.

References

  1. Bach L. T., Vaughan N. E., Law C. S., Williamson P. (2024). Implementation of marine CO₂ removal for climate mitigation: the challenges of additionality, predictability, and governability. Elementa: Sci. Anthropocene 12: 00034. doi:, doi:10.1525/elementa.2023.00034
  2. Baldocchi D. D. (2003). Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 479 – 492. doi: doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x
  3. Baldocchi D. (2014). Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3600 – 3609. doi:, doi:10.1111/gcb.12649
  4. Bellon G., Stevens B. (2012). Using the sensitivity of large-eddy simulations to evaluate atmospheric boundary-layer models. J. Atmos. Sci. 69, 1582 – 1601. doi: doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0160.1
  5. Boyd P. W., Claustre H., Levy M., Siegel D. A., Weber T. (2019). Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 568, 327 – 335. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1098-2
  6. Boyd P. W., Jickells T., Law C. S., Blain S., Boyle E. A., Buesseler K. O.. (2007). Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993–2005: synthesis and future directions. Science 315, 612 – 617. doi:, doi:10.1126/science.1131669
  7. Buesseler K. O., Bianchi D., Chai F., Cullen J. T., Estapa M., Hawco N.. (2024). Next steps for assessing ocean iron fertilization for marine carbon dioxide removal. Front. Clim. 6: 1430957. doi: doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1430957
  8. Carrillo J., Guerra J. C., Cuevas E., Barrancos J. (2016). Characterization of the marine boundary layer and the trade-wind inversion over the sub-tropical North Atlantic. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 158, 311 – 330. doi: doi:10.1007/s10546-015-0081-1
  9. Chelton D. B., Schlax M. G., Samelson R. M. (2011). Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Prog. Oceanogr. 91, 167 – 216. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002
  10. Ciais P., Sabine C., Bala G., Bopp L., Brovkin V., Canadell J.. (2013). " Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles," in Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 465 – 570.
  11. Deprez A., Leadley P., Dooley K., Williamson P., Cramer W., Gattuso J. P.. (2024). Sustainability limits needed for CO₂ removal. Science 383, 484 – 486. doi:, doi:10.1126/science.adj6171
  12. Doney S. C., Mitchell K. A., Henson S. A., Cavan E., DeVries T., Gruber N.. (2024). Observational and numerical modeling constraints on the global ocean biological carbon pump. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 38: e2024GB008156. doi: doi:10.1029/2024GB008156
  13. Eldering A., O'Dell C. W., Wennberg P. O., Crisp D., Gunson M. R., Viatte C.. (2017). The orbiting carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 549 – 563. doi: doi:10.5194/amt-10-549-2017
  14. European Marine Board (EMB) (2025). Monitoring, Reporting and Verification for Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal. EMB Future Science Brief No. 13. Ostend: European Marine Board.
  15. Fay A. R., McKinley G. A., Lovenduski N. S., Eddebbar Y., Levy M. N., Long M. C.. (2023). Immediate and long-lasting impacts of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption on ocean oxygen and carbon inventories. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 37: e2022GB007513. doi: doi:10.1029/2022GB007513
  16. Fennel K. (2026). The verification challenge of marine carbon dioxide removal. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 18, 141 – 164. doi:, doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-032123-025717
  17. Fiekowsky P., Burnham A. K. (2025). The Pinatubo CO₂ pause suggests a rapidly testable path to multi-Gt mCDR. Res. Sq. doi: doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6960838/v1
  18. Friedlingstein P., O'Sullivan M., Jones M. W., Andrew R. M., Hauck J., Landschützer P.. (2025). Global carbon budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 965 – 1039. doi: doi:10.5194/essd-17-965-2025
  19. Fuss S., Lamb W. F., Callaghan M. W., Hilaire J., Creutzig F., Amann T.. (2018). Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13: 063002. doi: doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f
  20. Haeckel M., van Beusekom J., Wiesner M. G., König I. (2001). The impact of the 1991 mount Pinatubo tephra fallout on the geochemical environment of the deep-sea sediments in the South China Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 193, 151 – 166. doi: doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00496-4
  21. Hooper G., Findlay H. S., Bell T. G., Wilson R. W., Halloran P. R. (2025). Removal of dissolved inorganic carbon from seawater for climate mitigation: potential marine ecosystem impacts. Front. Clim. 7: 1528951. doi: doi:10.3389/fclim.2025.1528951
  22. Huang H., Mao W. (2015). The South China Sea monsoon experiment—boundary layer height (SCSMEX-BLH): experimental design and preliminary results. Mon. Weather Rev. 143, 5035 – 5053. doi: doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0067.1
  23. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, et al. (Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press). doi: doi:10.1017/9781009157926
  24. Ito T., Reinhard C. T. (2025). A new framework for the attribution of air–sea CO₂ exchange. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 39: e2024GB008346. doi: doi:10.1029/2024GB008346
  25. Kuze A., Suto H., Nakajima M., Hamazaki T. (2009). Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the greenhouse gases observing satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. Appl. Opt. 48, 6716 – 6733. doi:, doi:10.1364/AO.48.006716
  26. NASEM (2022). A Research Strategy for Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  27. Nuijens L., Stevens B. (2012). The influence of wind speed on shallow marine cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 69, 168 – 184. doi: doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-02.1
  28. Oschlies A., Bach L. T., Fennel K., Gattuso J. P., Mengis N. (2025). Perspectives and challenges of marine carbon dioxide removal. Front. Clim. 6: 1506181. doi: doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1506181
  29. Renforth P., Henderson G. (2017). Assessing Ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration. Rev. Geophys. 55, 636 – 674. doi: doi:10.1002/2016RG000533
  30. Sierk B., Bézy J. L., Löscher A., Meijer Y. (2021). The Copernicus CO2M mission for monitoring anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions from space. Proc. SPIE 11852: 118523M. doi: doi:10.1117/12.2599613
  31. Smith S. M., Geden O., Gidden M. J., Lamb W. F., Nemet G. F., Minx J. C.. (2024). The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal. 2nd Edn. Available online at:
  32. Stal L. J. (2009). Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans related to temperature? Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1632 – 1645. doi:, doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00016.x
  33. Stull R. B. (1988). An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  34. Suto H., Kataoka F., Kikuchi N., Knuteson R. O., Butz A., Haun M.. (2021). Thermal and near-infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier transform spectrometer-2 (TANSO-FTS-2) on the greenhouse gases observing SATellite-2 (GOSAT-2) during its first year in orbit. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14, 2013 – 2039. doi: doi:10.5194/amt-14-2013-2021
  35. Taylor T. E., O'Dell C. W., Baker D., Bruegge C., Chang A., Chapsky L.. (2023). Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO₂ estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 16, 3173 – 3209. doi: doi:10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
  36. Wanninkhof R., Asher W. E., Ho D. T., Sweeney C., McGillis W. R. (2009). Advances in quantifying air–sea gas exchange and environmental forcing. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 213 – 244. doi:, doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742
  37. Wanninkhof R., Pickers P. A., Omar A. M., Sutton A., Murata A., Olsen A.. (2019). A surface ocean CO₂ reference network, SOCONET and associated marine boundary layer CO₂ measurements. Front. Mar. Sci. 6: 400. doi: doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00400
  38. Ward N. D., Hinson K. E., Pagès R., Cross J. N., Friedrichs M. A. M., Hauri C.. (2025). Regional Ocean biogeochemical modeling challenges for predicting the effectiveness of marine carbon dioxide removal. Front. Clim. 7: 1640617. doi: doi:10.3389/fclim.2025.1640617
  39. Wood R. (2012). Stratocumulus clouds. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 2373 – 2423. doi: doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00121.1
  40. Wood R., Bretherton C. S. (2004). Boundary layer depth, entrainment, and decoupling in the cloud-capped subtropical and tropical marine boundary layer. J. Clim. 17, 3576 – 3588. doi: doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3576:BLDEAD>2.0.CO;2

Citation

Fiekowsky, P., et al. (2026). Measuring large-scale mCDR using a novel Atmospheric CO₂ Perimeter Flux (ACPF) method. Frontiers in Climate, Volume 8. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
8 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Fiekowsky, Vijay and Jami.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Akhilesh Vijay

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0