Skip to content

Review

Frontiers in Catalysis ·

Volume 6 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fctls.2026.1844410

Catalytic valorization of lignocellulosic biomass: progress, challenges, and emerging opportunities in metal-based catalysis

  • Olufunso O. Abosede1*corresponding author
  • Kelechi P. Kanu1
  • Uchenna P. Ogodo2
  • Promise P. Gabriel1
  1. 1Department of Chemistry, Federal University Otuoke, Yenagoa, Nigeria
  2. 2Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The escalating demand for sustainable energy sources and chemical feedstocks has intensified research efforts toward the catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into value-added products. This comprehensive review critically examines recent advances in metal-based catalytic systems for biomass valorization, encompassing noble metals, transition metals, and their alloys. We systematically analyze the fundamental mechanisms governing catalytic transformations of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, with particular emphasis on structure-activity relationships and catalyst design principles. The review addresses critical challenges including catalyst deactivation, selectivity control, and scalability, while highlighting emerging opportunities in single-atom catalysis, bimetallic synergies, and integrated biorefinery concepts. Furthermore, we discuss the role of advanced characterization techniques and computational approaches in accelerating catalyst discovery. This work provides a roadmap for future research directions aimed at achieving economically viable and environmentally sustainable biomass conversion technologies.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass represents the most abundant renewable carbon source on Earth, with an estimated annual production exceeding 180 billion metric tons. Comprising agricultural residues, forestry waste, and dedicated energy crops, lignocellulose does not compete with food production, making it an ideal candidate for sustainable biorefinery operations. The transition toward a sustainable bioeconomy necessitates the development of efficient strategies for converting renewable biomass feedstocks into fuels, chemicals, and materials (Cherubini, 2010).

TABLE 1. Catalyst deactivation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. The following table summarizes primary deactivation mechanisms, affected catalysts, severity, and mitigation approaches.

MechanismAffected catalystsSeverityMitigation strategies
Sulfur poisoningPt, Pd, NiHighFeedstock desulfurization; sulfur-tolerant alloys (PtRe)
Coke formationAcid catalysts, NiVery highLower temperature; H2 co-feed; periodic oxidative regeneration; weakened acid sites
SinteringNoble metals, NiMediumSupport stabilization (reducible oxides like TiO2, CeO2); bimetallic formulations; lower temperature
LeachingMetals in aqueous phaseMedium-highpH control; support engineering; carbon encapsulation (e.g., N-doped carbon shells)
Phase transformationMetal oxides, carbidesLow-mediumAtmospheric control; temperature management; selecting hydrothermally stable supports (avoiding γ-Al2O3 and SiO2)

The complex, recalcitrant structure of lignocellulose presents significant challenges for efficient conversion (Himmel et al., 2007). Composed primarily of cellulose (40%–50%), hemicellulose (25%–35%), and lignin (15%–30%), lignocellulosic biomass requires sophisticated pretreatment and catalytic strategies to unlock its chemical potential (Klemm et al., 2005; Pauly and Keegstra, 2008). Metal-based catalysis has emerged as a cornerstone technology for biomass valorization, offering tunable activity, selectivity, and stability under diverse reaction conditions (Alonso et al., 2010; Rinaldi and Schüth, 2009).

Over the past decade, remarkable progress has been achieved in understanding the fundamental principles governing metal-catalyzed biomass transformations (Chheda et al., 2007; Gallezot, 2012). Noble metal catalysts, including platinum, palladium, and ruthenium, have demonstrated exceptional performance in hydrogenation, hydrodeoxygenation, and reforming reactions (Cortright et al., 2002; Mäki-Arvela et al., 2005). Simultaneously, earth-abundant transition metal catalysts based on nickel, cobalt, and copper have gained prominence due to their cost-effectiveness and unique catalytic properties (Chirik and Morris, 2015; Bullock et al., 2020).

This review aims to provide a comprehensive and critical assessment of recent advances in metal-based catalysis for lignocellulosic biomass valorization. We examine the current state of the art, identify key challenges, and discuss emerging opportunities that may shape the future of sustainable catalysis. The review is organized to address catalytic systems for each major biomass component, followed by discussions of cross-cutting themes including catalyst design, mechanistic understanding, and process integration.

2 Structure and composition of lignocellulosic biomass

Understanding the structural complexity of lignocellulosic biomass is essential for developing effective catalytic conversion strategies (Van de Vyver et al., 2011). The three primary components—cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin—differ significantly in their chemical structures, bonding patterns, and reactivity profiles (Ragauskas et al., 2014).

2.1 Cellulose

Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide consisting of β-1,4-linked D-glucose units, with degrees of polymerization ranging from 500 to 15,000 depending on the biomass source (Klemm et al., 2005). The extensive hydrogen bonding network between cellulose chains creates highly crystalline regions that resist enzymatic and chemical attack (Nishiyama et al., 2003). Both crystalline and amorphous domains coexist within cellulose microfibrils, with the crystallinity index significantly influencing conversion efficiency (Park et al., 2010).

The glycosidic bonds in cellulose can be cleaved through hydrolysis to yield glucose, which serves as a platform molecule for numerous downstream transformations (Rinaldi and Schüth, 2009; Fukuoka and Dhepe, 2006). Catalytic hydrogenation of glucose produces sorbitol, a valuable polyol used in food, pharmaceutical, and polymer industries (Gallezot et al., 1998). Further processing of glucose-derived intermediates can generate 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), levulinic acid, and other important chemical building blocks (Rosatella et al., 2011; Bozell and Petersen, 2010).

2.2 Hemicellulose

Unlike cellulose, hemicellulose is a heterogeneous polysaccharide comprising various pentoses (xylose, arabinose), hexoses (glucose, mannose, galactose), and uronic acids (Scheller and Ulvskov, 2010). The branched, amorphous structure of hemicellulose makes it more accessible to catalytic conversion compared to cellulose (Gírio et al., 2010). Xylan, the predominant hemicellulose in hardwoods and agricultural residues, can be hydrolyzed to xylose, which undergoes dehydration to form furfural; a key platform chemical (Mamman et al., 2008; Mariscal et al., 2016).

The diverse sugar composition of hemicellulose presents both opportunities and challenges for selective catalysis (Saha, 2003). Developing catalysts capable of simultaneously or sequentially processing multiple sugar types remains an active area of research (Dutta et al., 2012).

2.3 Lignin

Lignin is a complex, three-dimensional aromatic polymer derived from the radical polymerization of three primary monolignols: p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol (Ralph et al., 2004; Boerjan et al., 2003). The resulting phenylpropanoid network is cross-linked through various C-O and C-C bonds, including β-O-4, β-5, and five to five linkages (Adler, 1977; Parthasarathi et al., 2011). The β-O-4 ether bond, accounting for 40%–60% of all interunit linkages, represents the primary target for catalytic depolymerization (Chakar and Ragauskas, 2004).

Lignin valorization has historically lagged behind cellulose and hemicellulose conversion due to its structural heterogeneity and propensity for repolymerization during processing (Ragauskas et al., 2014; Schutyser et al., 2018). However, lignin’s aromatic structure makes it an attractive feedstock for producing valuable chemicals including phenols, aromatic hydrocarbons, and carbon materials (Xu et al., 2014; Zakzeski et al., 2010).

3 Noble metal catalysts for biomass conversion

Noble metal catalysts have been extensively investigated for biomass valorization due to their exceptional activity in hydrogenation, hydrodeoxygenation, and C-C bond formation reactions (Gallezot and Richard, 1998; Mäki-Arvela et al., 2005). Despite their high cost, noble metals often serve as benchmark catalysts and provide fundamental insights into reaction mechanisms (Nørskov et al., 2009).

3.1 Platinum-based catalysts

Platinum catalysts supported on various oxides (Al2O3, TiO2, ZrO2) have demonstrated remarkable performance in the aqueous-phase reforming of biomass-derived oxygenates (Cortright et al., 2002; Davda et al., 2005). The pioneering work by Dumesic and colleagues established Pt/Al2O3 as an effective catalyst for hydrogen production from glucose and sorbitol under mild conditions (Dumesic et al., 2003). Subsequent studies revealed that the support acidity plays a crucial role in directing product selectivity, with acidic supports favoring C-C bond cleavage and basic supports promoting C-O bond hydrogenolysis (Maris and Davis, 2007; Wang et al., 1996).

Recent advances in Pt catalyst design have focused on controlling particle size, shape, and metal-support interactions (Campbell, 2013; Tauster et al., 1981). Single-atom Pt catalysts, wherein isolated Pt atoms are stabilized on oxide or carbon supports, have shown exceptional atom efficiency and unique selectivity patterns in cellulose hydrogenolysis (Qiao et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013). Chen et al. (2018) demonstrated that Pt1/CeO2 single-atom catalysts exhibited 100% selectivity toward C6 products in sorbitol conversion, contrasting with the extensive C-C cleavage observed on Pt nanoparticles.

3.2 Palladium-based catalysts

Palladium catalysts excel in selective hydrogenation reactions, particularly the conversion of biomass-derived unsaturated compounds (Nishimura, 2001; Sitthisa et al., 2011). The mild hydrogen activation capability of Pd enables chemoselective transformations that preserve sensitive functional groups. Pd/C catalysts have been widely employed for the hydrogenation of 5-HMF to 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF), a promising biofuel candidate with high energy density (Román-Leshkov et al., 2007; Chatterjee et al., 2014).

The incorporation of a second metal to form Pd alloys has proven effective in modulating catalytic properties (Sankar et al., 2012; Sinfelt, 1983). PdAu bimetallic catalysts exhibited enhanced stability and selectivity in glucose oxidation to gluconic acid, attributed to electronic modifications of Pd by neighboring Au atoms (Prati and Porta, 2005; Mallat and Baiker, 2004). Similarly, PdCu alloys demonstrated improved performance in furfural hydrogenation by suppressing over-hydrogenation and decarbonylation pathways (Sitthisa and Resasco, 2011; Studt et al., 2008).

3.3 Ruthenium-based catalysts

Ruthenium occupies a special position among noble metals for biomass conversion due to its versatility in C-O and C-C bond activation (Michel and Gallezot, 2015). Ru/C catalysts are the industrial standard for sorbitol production through glucose hydrogenation, achieving near-quantitative yields under optimized conditions (Nakagawa et al., 2013). The metallic state of Ru is crucial for hydrogenation activity, necessitating reductive pretreatment or in-situ reduction during operation (Kusunoki et al., 2005).

Bifunctional Ru catalysts combining metal sites with acidic supports have enabled one-pot conversions that integrate multiple reaction steps (Miyazawa et al., 2006). For instance, Ru supported on acidic zeolites (HZSM-5, HY) catalyzed the direct conversion of cellulose to hexitols through sequential hydrolysis and hydrogenation (Op de Beeck et al., 2015). Liu et al. (2012) reported that Ru/Cs3PW12O40 catalysts achieved 60% yield of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol from cellulose via tandem hydrolysis, retro-aldol condensation, and hydrogenation.

4 Transition metal catalysts: earth-abundant alternatives

The high cost and limited availability of noble metals have motivated extensive research into earth-abundant transition metal catalysts for biomass valorization (Chirik and Morris, 2015; Beller et al., 2017). Nickel, cobalt, copper, and iron-based catalysts offer compelling advantages including lower cost, tunable electronic properties, and in some cases, unique reactivity patterns not achievable with noble metals (Bullock et al., 2020; Ludwig et al., 2017).

4.1 Nickel-based catalysts

Nickel catalysts have emerged as leading candidates for replacing noble metals in biomass hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation reactions (Gilkey and Xu, 2016). The ability of Ni to activate both molecular hydrogen and C-O bonds makes it particularly suitable for reducing highly oxygenated biomass derivatives (Yamaguchi et al., 2014). However, bulk Ni suffers from rapid deactivation due to sintering and carbon deposition, necessitating strategies to improve stability (Argyle and Bartholomew, 2015). Support engineering has proven effective in enhancing Ni catalyst performance, with Ni supported on reducible oxides such as TiO2 and CeO2 exhibiting superior activity and stability compared to Ni/SiO2 and Ni/Al2O3, attributed to strong metal-support interactions that anchor Ni particles and promote oxygen vacancy formation (He et al., 2016). Bimetallic Ni catalysts represent another promising approach, with NiFe alloys displaying exceptional activity in lignin hydrogenolysis and NiMo catalysts achieving complete conversion of guaiacol to cyclohexane under mild conditions (Ferrini and Rinaldi, 2014; Wang et al., 2012).

4.2 Cobalt-based catalysts

Cobalt catalysts have attracted attention for their activity in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and related hydrogenation reactions (Khodakov et al., 2007; Iglesia, 1997). In biomass conversion, Co-based catalysts have shown promise for aqueous-phase hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolics (Tuxen et al., 2013). The moderate hydrogen adsorption strength on Co surfaces enables selective transformations that avoid excessive hydrogenation. Recent studies have explored Co phosphide (CoP) and Co carbide (Co2C) phases for biomass upgrading, with these metal-rich compounds offering distinct electronic structures compared to metallic Co, leading to modified selectivity patterns (Chen et al., 2018; Zhong et al., 2016). Zhao et al. (2016) demonstrated that CoP catalysts selectively converted furfural to 2-methylfuran with 95% yield, whereas metallic Co favored complete ring hydrogenation.

4.3 Copper-based catalysts

Copper catalysts occupy a unique niche in biomass catalysis due to their selective hydrogenation of carbonyl groups without affecting C=C or aromatic C-O bonds (Hammer and Nørskov, 2000). This chemoselectivity makes Cu catalysts ideal for producing furfuryl alcohol from furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from 5-HMF reduction (Nagaraja et al., 2003; Waugh, 1992). The weak Cu-H bond strength, while limiting overall activity, prevents over-hydrogenation that plagues more reactive metals. Cu-based catalysts have also demonstrated excellent performance in alcohol dehydrogenation and oxidation reactions relevant to biomass processing, with CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts efficiently catalyzing the transfer hydrogenation of biomass-derived carbonyl compounds using alcohols as hydrogen donors (Gilkey et al., 2015; Panagiotopoulou and Vlachos, 2014).

5 Catalytic strategies for cellulose valorization

The catalytic conversion of cellulose to value-added chemicals and fuels remains one of the grand challenges in biorefinery research (Ruppert et al., 2012; Van de Vyver et al., 2011). The robust crystalline structure of cellulose necessitates either pretreatment or specialized catalytic systems capable of disrupting the hydrogen bonding network and cleaving glycosidic bonds (Kobayashi and Fukuoka, 2013).

5.1 One-pot cellulose-to-polyol conversion

The direct conversion of cellulose to sugar alcohols (sorbitol, mannitol) and smaller polyols (ethylene glycol, propylene glycol) represents an attractive route that circumvents the need for separate hydrolysis and hydrogenation steps (Zheng et al., 2016). This approach requires bifunctional catalysts combining acidic sites for cellulose hydrolysis with metal sites for glucose hydrogenation (Komanoya et al., 2011). Zhang and colleagues pioneered the development of tungsten-based catalytic systems for cellulose conversion to ethylene glycol using Ni-W2C/AC catalysts in hot compressed water, achieving 75% yield through a cascade of hydrolysis, retro-aldol condensation, and hydrogenation reactions (Ji et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2010). Supported metal catalysts combined with mineral acids have also proven effective, with Ru/C in the presence of dilute H2SO4 or heteropolyacids achieving near-quantitative yields of sorbitol from microcrystalline cellulose (Luo et al., 2007; Palkovits et al., 2010).

5.2 Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural

5-HMF is a versatile platform molecule derived from hexose sugars through acid-catalyzed dehydration (Van Putten et al., 2013; Kuster, 1990). The conversion pathway involves sequential elimination of three water molecules, proceeding through enol-keto tautomerization and cyclic intermediates (Antal et al., 1990). Metal catalysts, particularly those containing Lewis acidic sites, can significantly enhance 5-HMF selectivity by modulating the reaction mechanism. Sn-Beta zeolite has emerged as an exceptionally effective catalyst for glucose isomerization to fructose, which subsequently undergoes dehydration to 5-HMF (Nikolla et al., 2011; Moliner et al., 2010). The isolated Sn(IV) sites within the zeolite framework exhibit Lewis acidity that facilitates the intramolecular hydride shift required for glucose-to-fructose conversion (Bermejo-Deval et al., 2012). Integration of Sn-Beta with Brønsted acidic materials or solvents enables one-pot glucose-to-5-HMF conversion with yields exceeding 70% (Binder and Raines, 2009).

5.3 Levulinic acid production

Levulinic acid, produced through rehydration of 5-HMF, is designated as one of the top platform chemicals from biomass by the U.S. Department of Energy (Werpy and Petersen, 2004). This C5 compound serves as a precursor to diverse products including γ-valerolactone, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, and diphenolic acid (Horváth et al., 2008; Girisuta et al., 2006). Metal catalysts play essential roles in downstream levulinic acid transformations, particularly the hydrogenation to γ-valerolactone. Ru-based catalysts have demonstrated superior performance for this conversion, achieving quantitative yields under mild conditions (Alonso et al., 2013). Abdelrahman et al. (2015) systematically investigated the influence of support properties on Ru catalyst activity, finding that acidic supports (ZrO2, TiO2) outperformed neutral and basic supports due to cooperative effects between metal and acid sites.

6 Advances in lignin depolymerization and upgrading

Lignin valorization has historically been the Achilles’ heel of biorefinery operations, with the majority of industrial lignin being combusted for low-value heat generation (Calvo-Flores and Dobado, 2010). However, lignin’s aromatic structure makes it the only renewable source of naturally occurring phenolic compounds, driving intense research efforts toward selective depolymerization and upgrading (Holladay et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2018).

6.1 Reductive catalytic fractionation

Reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF), also known as lignin-first biorefinery, represents a paradigm shift in biomass processing strategy (Abu-Omar et al., 2021; Galkin and Samec, 2016). In contrast to conventional approaches that treat lignin as a byproduct of cellulose processing, RCF prioritizes lignin extraction and conversion at the earliest possible stage. Native lignin, before undergoing condensation reactions during pulping, retains a higher proportion of cleavable β-O-4 linkages (Renders et al., 2017). The RCF process involves treating whole biomass with hydrogen and a metal catalyst in alcohol solvents, simultaneously extracting and hydrogenolytically cleaving lignin (Van den Bosch et al., 2015). Sels and colleagues demonstrated that Ru/C catalysts in methanol achieved near-theoretical yields of phenolic monomers (50%–55% based on Klason lignin) from birch wood, with the primary products (4-propylguaiacol and 4-propylsyringol) retaining the propyl side chain from the native lignin structure (Shuai et al., 2016; Anderson et al., 2016). Ni-based catalysts have emerged as cost-effective alternatives to Ru, with Ni/C and Ni/Al2O3 achieving comparable monomer yields (Song et al., 2013; Klein et al., 2015).

6.2 Oxidative depolymerization

Oxidative strategies for lignin depolymerization offer the potential to produce oxygenated aromatics such as vanillin, syringaldehyde, and aromatic acids (Ma et al., 2015). Unlike reductive approaches, oxidation can proceed under ambient pressure and may be integrated with existing pulping operations. However, controlling selectivity to prevent over-oxidation to CO2 remains challenging (Crestini et al., 2010). Homogeneous metal catalysts, including vanadium, copper, and cobalt complexes, have demonstrated selective oxidative cleavage of lignin model compounds (Sedai et al., 2013; Hanson et al., 2012). Son and Toste (2010) reported that a vanadium-oxo complex catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of lignin β-O-4 linkages to ketones, which could be subsequently cleaved under mild basic conditions. Heterogeneous oxidation catalysts offer advantages in separation and recyclability, with perovskite-type oxides (LaCoO3, LaMnO3) showing promise for lignin oxidation (Peña and Fierro, 2001). Rahimi et al. (2014) developed a formic acid-mediated oxidation system using H2O2 that converted organosolv lignin to low-molecular-weight aromatics with 60% yield.

6.3 Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolics

Regardless of the depolymerization method employed, lignin-derived phenolic monomers typically require hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) to produce hydrocarbon fuels or chemical feedstocks (Wang et al., 2013; Furimsky, 2000). The selective removal of oxygen while preserving carbon chain length presents distinct catalytic challenges (Robinson et al., 2016). Noble metal catalysts (Pt, Pd, Ru) supported on acidic oxides efficiently catalyze phenolic HDO through a bifunctional mechanism involving metal-catalyzed ring hydrogenation followed by acid-catalyzed dehydration (Zhao et al., 2011; 2009). However, this route produces saturated cyclic hydrocarbons, sacrificing the aromatic character that imparts value to lignin-derived products. Direct deoxygenation (DDO) pathways that preserve aromaticity have been achieved using Mo2C, MoP, and related metal carbide/phosphide catalysts (Lee et al., 2014; Bui et al., 2012). These materials promote C-O bond cleavage through mechanisms distinct from noble metal hydrogenation, yielding benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) products directly from phenolic substrates (Prasomsri et al., 2013).

7 Emerging catalyst design strategies

The rational design of catalysts for biomass conversion has been accelerated by advances in synthesis methods, characterization techniques, and computational modeling (Schlögl, 2015; Seh et al., 2017). This section highlights emerging strategies that promise to enhance catalyst performance and enable new transformation pathways.

7.1 Single-atom catalysis

Single-atom catalysts (SACs), wherein isolated metal atoms are anchored on support surfaces, represent the ultimate limit of metal dispersion and atom efficiency (Wang et al., 2018; Mitchell et al., 2018). The unique coordination environment of single atoms, distinct from both bulk metals and molecular complexes, gives rise to exceptional selectivity in several biomass-relevant reactions (Yang et al., 2013; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, 2014). Pt single atoms supported on FeOx (Pt1/FeOx) demonstrated unprecedented selectivity (>99%) for hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene to 3-aminostyrene, a challenging transformation relevant to lignin-derived aromatics (Wei et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2019). The stability of SACs under reaction conditions remains a significant concern, as single atoms are thermodynamically driven to aggregate into nanoparticles (Liu, 2016). Strong metal-support interactions, defect engineering, and spatial confinement strategies have been developed to kinetically stabilize isolated atoms (Therrien et al., 2018). Demonstrated that Pt single atoms confined within mesoporous silica channels maintained atomic dispersion even after 100 h of continuous operation.

7.2 Bimetallic synergies

Bimetallic catalysts offer opportunities to combine the advantageous properties of two metals, often resulting in synergistic effects that exceed the sum of individual contributions (Yu et al., 2012; Alonso et al., 2013). Electronic modifications, ensemble effects, and bifunctional mechanisms can all contribute to enhanced performance (Rodriguez and Goodman, 1992). The combination of noble metals with oxophilic promoters (ReOx, MoOx, WOx) has proven particularly effective for C-O bond hydrogenolysis (Tomishige et al., 2017). PtRe catalysts exhibited exceptional activity and selectivity for glycerol hydrogenolysis to 1,3-propanediol, attributed to ReOx species that activate the secondary C-O bond (Koso et al., 2009). Similarly, RhMoOx catalysts achieved high selectivity for sorbitol hydrogenolysis to 1,2,6-hexanetriol through preferential cleavage of terminal C-O bonds. Core-shell and surface alloy architectures enable precise control over the geometric and electronic properties of bimetallic surfaces (Gilroy et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2013). Pd-Pt core-shell nanoparticles, with a Pt monolayer coating a Pd core, displayed modified Pt electronic structure that enhanced selectivity in furfural hydrogenation.

7.3 Confinement and encapsulation

Confining metal nanoparticles within microporous or mesoporous hosts provides multiple benefits including size control, enhanced stability, and shape-selective catalysis (Astruc et al., 2005; Prieto et al., 2016). Zeolite-encapsulated metal clusters have received particular attention for biomass applications due to the tunable acidity and well-defined pore structures of zeolitic hosts (Moliner et al., 2010). Metal nanoclusters confined within zeolite cages exhibited distinct selectivity patterns compared to supported catalysts, attributed to restricted transition state geometries and modified adsorption configurations (Goel et al., 2014). Carbon encapsulation offers an alternative approach for protecting metal nanoparticles against sintering and leaching (Deng et al., 2016). Bao and coworkers developed Co nanoparticles encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon shells that exhibited remarkable stability in aqueous-phase biomass conversion, maintaining activity over 500 h of continuous operation.

8 Mechanistic insights from advanced characterization

Understanding the mechanistic details of catalytic biomass transformations is essential for rational catalyst design and process optimization (Weckhuysen, 2003; Topsøe, 2003). Advanced characterization techniques, operating under in-situ or operando conditions, have provided unprecedented insights into catalyst structure-function relationships (Bañares, 2005; Tinnemans et al., 2006).

8.1 Operando spectroscopy

Operando spectroscopy enables real-time observation of catalyst structural changes and surface intermediates during reaction (Frenkel et al., 2012). These techniques bridge the “pressure gap” between ultra-high vacuum surface science studies and practical catalytic conditions (Newton, 2008). X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has been extensively applied to monitor oxidation states and coordination environments of metal catalysts during biomass conversion. Lercher and colleagues used in-situ XAS to demonstrate that Ni/ZrO2 catalysts undergo dynamic changes in Ni oxidation state during phenol hydrodeoxygenation, with partially oxidized Ni+ species identified as the active sites for C-O bond cleavage. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy provides complementary information on adsorbed species and reaction intermediates (Ryczkowski, 2001; Andanson and Baiker, 2010). Attenuated total reflectance IR (ATR-IR) has proven particularly valuable for studying aqueous-phase biomass reactions. Dumesic and colleagues employed ATR-IR to identify ketene as a key intermediate in acetic acid ketonization on TiO2 and ZrO2 catalysts (Ignatchenko et al., 2012).

8.2 Computational approaches

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have become indispensable tools for elucidating reaction mechanisms and guiding catalyst design (Nørskov et al., 2011; Greeley et al., 2006). The combination of experimental and computational approaches enables construction of complete reaction energy profiles and identification of rate-determining steps (Medford et al., 2015). Vlachos and coworkers developed a microkinetic modeling framework for cellulose pyrolysis and hydrolysis, integrating DFT-calculated parameters with experimental validation (Mettler et al., 2012; Mayes and Broadbelt, 2012). Their analysis revealed that glucose ring-opening is rate-limiting under hydrolysis conditions, suggesting that catalyst optimization should focus on stabilizing the ring-opening transition state. Machine learning approaches are increasingly being applied to accelerate catalyst discovery for biomass conversion (Takahashi et al., 2019; Ulissi et al., 2017). Trained on DFT databases, machine learning models can rapidly predict adsorption energies and reaction barriers for novel catalyst formulations (Tran and Ulissi, 2018).

8.3 Isotope labeling studies

Isotope labeling provides definitive evidence for reaction mechanisms that cannot be obtained through spectroscopic methods alone (Jones, 2003; Simmons and Hartwig, 2012). The use of 13C, 2H, and 18O labels enables tracking of specific atoms through complex reaction networks. 13C labeling studies have been instrumental in elucidating the mechanism of cellulose conversion to ethylene glycol (Wang and Zhang, 2013). By employing selectively labeled glucose isotopomers, Zhang and colleagues demonstrated that retro-aldol condensation cleaves the C3-C4 bond, with the C1-C2-C3 fragment giving rise to glycolaldehyde (precursor to ethylene glycol) and the C4-C5-C6 fragment yielding 1,3-dihydroxyacetone (Pang et al., 2016).

9 Challenges and emerging opportunities

Despite remarkable progress, significant challenges remain in translating laboratory advances to industrial implementation (Lange, 2015; Moulijn et al., 2001). This section identifies key barriers and discusses emerging opportunities that may accelerate commercialization of catalytic biomass valorization.

9.1 Catalyst deactivation: mechanisms, mitigation, and economic Implications

Catalyst deactivation represents perhaps the most significant barrier separating laboratory demonstrations from commercial biomass valorization. While Sections 3–7 have discussed specific deactivation phenomena for individual catalyst classes, systematic treatment of deactivation mechanisms, mitigation strategies, and economic consequences provides essential context for technology development priorities.

Bartholomew (2001) established a comprehensive framework classifying deactivation into six primary mechanisms: poisoning, fouling, thermal degradation, vapor compound formation, attrition, and chemical reaction. For biomass catalysis, the first three mechanisms dominate, each requiring distinct mitigation approaches (Bartholomew, 2001).

9.2 Deactivation mechanisms specific to biomass catalysis

Poisoning by Heteroatoms and Impurities: Biomass-derived streams contain numerous potential catalyst poisons absent in petroleum feeds. Sulfur, present at 0.05–0.3 wt% in lignocellulosic biomass, irreversibly adsorbs on metal surfaces, blocking active sites. Chlorine and alkali metals (Na, K) from ash further contribute to poisoning. For Pt/Al2O3 reforming catalysts, S concentrations exceeding 10 ppm cause rapid deactivation (Argyle and Bartholomew, 2015).

Fouling by Carbonaceous Deposits: Biomass-derived molecules containing furan rings (furfural, 5-HMF) exhibit high propensity for polymerization on catalyst surfaces, forming carbonaceous deposits (coke) that physically block active sites and pores. Coking rates accelerate with increasing temperature and acid site strength. Nickel catalysts in particular suffer from carbon deposition, with whisker carbon formation capable of fragmenting catalyst particles (Bartholomew, 2001).

10 Economic impact of catalyst deactivation

Catalyst lifetime directly translates to economic viability. For noble metal catalysts, achieving commercial targets requires processing 5,000–20,000 kg biomass per kg catalyst. Many literature reports demonstrate <1,000 kg/kg, necessitating 5–20× improvement. For a 2000 ton/day biorefinery using 5 wt% Pt/C catalyst, improving lifetime from 1,000 to 10,000 kg/kg reduces annual catalyst replacement costs from $15 million to $1.5 million—the difference between commercial infeasibility and viability ( Bartling et al., 2021).

10.1 Selectivity control in complex reaction networks

Biomass conversion often involves complex reaction networks with multiple competing pathways, making selective production of target molecules challenging (Chheda and Dumesic, 2007; Corma and Huber, 2007). The highly functionalized nature of biomass-derived intermediates provides numerous reaction handles that can lead to over-conversion or undesired side reactions (Climent et al., 2014a). Kinetic control of selectivity requires precise matching of catalyst properties to reaction requirements. For sequential reactions where the desired product is an intermediate, catalyst design must balance activity for the initial transformation against reactivity toward subsequent conversions (Nakagawa and Tomishige, 2010; Corma et al., 2007a). Time-resolved product analysis and microkinetic modeling can guide optimization of reaction conditions for maximum selectivity (Salciccioli et al., 2011).

10.2 Process intensification and integration

The economic viability of biomass conversion depends critically on process efficiency and integration (Stankiewicz and Moulijn, 2000; Dauenhauer and Huber, 2014). The “biorefinery” concept envisions integrated facilities analogous to petroleum refineries, wherein multiple product streams are generated from a common feedstock (Cherubini, 2010). Reactive distillation and membrane reactors offer opportunities for process intensification by coupling reaction with separation (Kiss, 2013). Luterbacher and colleagues demonstrated a reactive distillation process for converting biomass to γ-valerolactone, achieving yields exceeding 70% with continuous product removal (Luterbacher et al., 2014). Cascade catalysis, wherein multiple reactions are performed in sequence without intermediate isolation, can dramatically reduce processing costs (Climent et al., 2014b; Lee et al., 2016). However, designing catalyst systems that function synergistically without mutual interference remains challenging. Compartmentalized catalysts, with different active sites spatially separated, offer a potential solution to incompatibility issues (Wheeldon et al., 2016).

10.3 Renewable hydrogen for biomass upgrading

Many biomass conversion pathways require hydrogen for hydrogenation, hydrodeoxygenation, or hydrogenolysis reactions (Turner, 2004; Holladay et al., 2009). Currently, most industrial hydrogen is produced from natural gas through steam methane reforming, negating some of the environmental benefits of biomass utilization (Dincer and Acar, 2015). Coupling biomass conversion with renewable hydrogen production offers a pathway to fully sustainable processes. Water electrolysis powered by renewable electricity can provide “green” hydrogen, while integrated aqueous-phase reforming of biomass fractions offers a carbon-neutral alternative (Ursua et al., 2012; Cortright et al., 2002).

11 Life cycle environmental assessment of catalytic biomass valorization

The preceding sections have established the technical feasibility and mechanistic understanding of metal-catalyzed biomass valorization. However, technical performance alone provides an incomplete picture of sustainability. Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become indispensable for evaluating the true environmental credentials of biomass conversion technologies, ensuring that claimed sustainability benefits are realized across the entire value chain rather than representing burden shifting from one environmental impact category to another (Cherubini and Strømman, 2011).

11.1 LCA methodology and system boundaries

Life cycle assessment follows standardized methodologies (ISO 14040 and ISO 14044) that define four distinct phases: goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment, and interpretation. For biomass valorization, proper system boundary definition critically influences results and conclusions. Two primary boundary approaches exist: cradle-to-gate analysis, encompassing biomass cultivation through product synthesis, and cradle-to-grave analysis, extending through product use and end-of-life disposal (IEA Bioenergy Task 38, 2013).

For catalytic biomass conversion, the functional unit, the reference flow to which inputs and outputs are normalized must be carefully selected. Common choices include 1 kg of product, 1 MJ of energy content, or 1 km of transportation service. Selection significantly influences comparative results. Energy-based functional units (MJ or GJ) facilitate comparison with fossil alternatives, while mass-based units prove more appropriate for chemical production pathways.

Allocation presents particular challenges in multi-product biorefineries. When catalytic processes generate multiple co-products: for instance, lignin-derived aromatics alongside cellulose-derived fuels environmental burdens must be partitioned among outputs. Allocation methods include physical allocation (based on mass or energy content), economic allocation (based on market value), and system expansion (crediting co-products with avoided production burdens). Recent guidance from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Bioenergy Technologies Office emphasizes the importance of transparent allocation methodology documentation, as different approaches can yield substantially different results (U.S. Department of Energy, 2025).

11.2 Global warming potential and GHG emissions analysis

Greenhouse gas emissions constitute the primary driver for biomass valorization adoption, yet rigorous analysis often reveals more nuanced environmental profiles than simplistic carbon neutrality assumptions suggest. Recent life cycle assessments of biomass-derived diesel pathways demonstrate this complexity. Xu et al., 2022 found that biodiesel and renewable diesel from soybean, canola, and carinata oils achieve 40%–69% GHG reductions compared to petroleum diesel when land use change is properly accounted for. However, this range highlights significant variability dependent on agricultural practices, feedstock source, and process energy inputs (Xu et al., 2022).

Crucially, the assumption of biogenic carbon neutrality requires careful examination. Cherubini et al. (2011) demonstrated that CO2 emissions from biomass combustion contribute to atmospheric radiative forcing during the temporal lag between emission and carbon resequestration through biomass regrowth. For woody biomass with 20–100-year rotation periods, this temporal mismatch results in non-negligible climate forcing. Their analysis calculated global warming potential factors for biogenic CO2 ranging from 0.13 to 0.62 depending on rotation length and assessment time horizon, conclusively refuting assumptions of immediate carbon neutrality (Cherubini et al., 2011).

For catalytic biomass conversion specifically, GHG accounting must encompass.

  • Feedstock production and collection: Including fertilizer production (particularly N-based fertilizers with significant N2O emissions), agricultural machinery operation, and transportation
  • Catalyst production: Noble metal catalysts incur substantial embodied energy and emissions from mining and refining. Pt/C catalysts, for example, carry embodied emissions of approximately 15–25 kg CO2-eq per gram Pt depending on ore grade and processing route
  • Process energy consumption: Thermal energy for pretreatment, reaction heat duty, and product separations. High-pressure hydrogenation/hydrodeoxygenation processes are particularly energy-intensive
  • Hydrogen sourcing: Fossil-derived hydrogen from steam methane reforming generates ∼10 kg CO2 per kg H2, potentially overwhelming biomass carbon benefits. Green hydrogen from renewable electrolysis reduces this burden to 0.5–2 kg CO2-eq/kg H2 depending on electricity source
  • Process chemical inputs: Methanol solvents, mineral acids for pretreatment, and caustic bases each carry upstream production burdens
  • Direct process emissions: Including fugitive CH4 emissions from anaerobic digestion steps and N2O from wastewater treatment

Recent LCA of biomass-to-hydrogen systems illustrates these complexities. Analysis of woody biomass gasification for hydrogen production found net GHG emissions ranging from −0.5 to +3.2 kg CO2-eq per kg H2 depending on system configuration, with carbon-negative outcomes achievable only when coupling with carbon capture and storage ( Gubin et al., 2024 ).

11.3 Energy return on investment and net energy analysis

Energy return on investment (EROI), defined as the ratio of energy output to energy input, provides a complementary metric to GHG analysis for assessing sustainability. Biomass conversion pathways must achieve sufficient EROI to justify resource allocation compared to alternative uses. Generally, EROI values exceeding 3:1 indicate viable energy systems, while values below 1.5:1 raise questions about net energy benefits ( Hall et al., 2009).

For catalytic biomass valorization, cumulative energy demand (CED) analysis reveals energy consumption across the value chain. Recent assessments of catalytic fast pyrolysis followed by hydrotreating found CED values of 1.3–1.8 MJ per MJ of gasoline-equivalent product, corresponding to EROI of 0.56–0.77. These values reflect the substantial energy requirements for hydrogen production, catalytic upgrading, and product separation. Improvements through process intensification, heat integration, and renewable energy sourcing are essential for achieving favorable energy balances (Iisa et al., 2023; Davis et al., 2024).

11.4 Water consumption and eutrophication impacts

Water resource impacts of biomass valorization extend beyond direct process consumption to encompass feedstock irrigation, process cooling, and wastewater generation. Aqueous-phase catalytic conversion processes are particularly water-intensive, typically consuming 3–8 L water per L biofuel produced. Moreover, wastewater streams from biomass pretreatment and fermentation contain high organic loads, requiring extensive treatment before discharge (King et al., 2010).

Eutrophication potential represents another critical impact category. Nutrient runoff from biomass cultivation particularly nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizer application contributes to aquatic ecosystem degradation. Recent comparative LCA found that biomass-to-biofuel pathways can exhibit eutrophication impacts 2–4 times higher than fossil fuel routes when feedstock cultivation dominates the life cycle burden (Castro et al., 2023).

11.5 Comparative environmental assessment

Meaningful LCA requires comparative assessment against relevant alternatives. For transportation fuels, the reference system typically comprises petroleum-derived gasoline or diesel with baseline GHG intensities of 88–95 g CO2-eq/MJ. However, as electrical grids decarbonize and hydrogen production shifts toward renewable sources, these baselines evolve. Dynamic LCA approaches that account for temporal changes in background systems provide more realistic assessments of future environmental performance (Sacchi et al., 2022).

Recent multi-generational biorefinery analysis comparing algal hydrothermal liquefaction (third generation), combined algae processing (third generation), and palm oil-derived pathways (second generation) illustrates the importance of feedstock selection. The study found that third-generation algal pathways achieved negative net GHG emissions (−15 to −45 g CO2-eq/MJ) through coupling with carbon capture, whereas palm oil pathways exhibited positive emissions (+35 to +55 g CO2-eq/MJ) due to land use change burdens.

12 Techno-economic assessment of catalytic biomass conversion

Technical feasibility, while necessary, proves insufficient for successful commercialization of biomass valorization technologies. Economic viability ultimately determines market adoption and large-scale deployment. Techno-economic analysis (TEA) provides systematic methodology for evaluating process economics, identifying cost drivers, and guiding research priorities toward commercially relevant outcomes (Davis et al., 2018).

12.1 TEA methodology and key economic metrics

Techno-economic analysis integrates process modeling, capital cost estimation, and financial analysis to calculate key economic indicators. The minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) or minimum product selling price represents the price required to achieve specified financial returns (typically 10% internal rate of return) and serves as the primary metric for comparing alternative pathways. MFSP calculations incorporate.

  • Capital expenditure (CAPEX) annualized over project lifetime
  • Operating expenditure (OPEX) including feedstock, catalysts, utilities, and labor
  • Financing costs and depreciation schedules
  • Tax treatment and regulatory incentives
  • Co-product credits that offset primary product costs

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has established rigorous TEA frameworks specifically for biomass conversion, with harmonized assumptions enabling consistent cross-pathway comparison. Recent NREL design cases for catalytic conversion of sugars to sustainable aviation fuel via aqueous-phase reforming calculated MFSP of $3.85–4.25 per gasoline-gallon equivalent (GGE), compared to current petroleum jet fuel prices of $2.50–3.00/GGE, indicating that cost reductions of 20%–40% are required for economic competitiveness without policy support (Davis et al., 2024).

12.2 Capital cost analysis and scaling considerations

Capital expenditure typically dominates biomass conversion economics, representing 60%–75% of minimum selling price in most pathways. For a representative 2000 dry metric ton per day biorefinery producing transportation fuels via catalytic conversion, total capital investment ranges from $400–800 million depending on process configuration. Major cost contributors include.

  • Biomass preprocessing and handling (15%–20%): Grinding, drying, conveying systems
  • Pretreatment systems (20%–25%): High-pressure reactors for dilute acid or steam explosion
  • Catalytic conversion (30%–40%): Reaction vessels, heat exchangers, catalyst systems
  • Product separation and purification (25%–35%): Distillation, extraction, upgrading equipment
  • Utilities and infrastructure (10%–15%): Boilers, cooling towers, wastewater treatment

Scale significantly influences unit economics through classical economies of scale. Doubling plant capacity typically reduces per-unit capital costs by 20%–30% due to the 0.6–0.7 scaling exponent for process equipment. However, biomass logistics impose practical scale limits. Collection radius increases with facility size, raising feedstock transportation costs and potentially limiting sustainable biomass availability. Analysis suggests that 2000–3000 dry ton/day represents an optimal scale balancing capital economy against feedstock logistics (Humbird et al., 2011).

12.3 Operating costs and sensitivity analysis

Operating expenditures encompass variable costs (feedstock, catalysts, chemicals, utilities) and fixed costs (labor, maintenance, insurance). For catalytic biomass conversion, feedstock typically represents the largest single OPEX component at 30%–50% of total, with delivered biomass costs ranging from $80–120 per dry ton depending on logistics and preprocessing requirements.

Catalyst costs merit particular attention given the focus of this review. For noble metal catalysts, material costs alone can substantially impact economics. At current Pt prices (∼$30,000/kg), a 5 wt% Pt/C catalyst processing 10,000 kg biomass per kg catalyst generates catalyst costs of $15 per ton biomass processed—seemingly modest. However, many laboratory demonstrations achieve only 100–1000 kg/kg catalyst lifetimes, elevating catalyst costs to $150–1500 per ton biomass, rendering processes economically infeasible. Earth-abundant metal catalysts offer economic advantages: even with lower per-cycle activity, their 10–100× lower material costs enable competitive economics at achievable lifetimes (Bartling et al., 2021).

Hydrogen costs critically influence economics for hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation pathways. At current steam methane reforming hydrogen prices of $1.50–2.00 per kg H2, hydrogen-intensive processes (requiring >50 kg H2 per ton biomass) incur hydrogen costs exceeding feedstock costs. Transition to renewable hydrogen whether biomass-derived gasification-based ($2–3/kg H2) or green electrolytic ($5–8/kg H2) substantially increases costs. Recent NREL analysis found that switching from gray to green hydrogen increased MFSP by $0.50–0.75/GGE, representing 15%–20% cost penalty (Rosales Calderon et al., 2024).

Sensitivity analysis identifies which parameters most strongly influence economics, guiding research priorities. For most catalytic biomass pathways, economic outcomes exhibit greatest sensitivity to.

  • Feedstock cost: ±$20/ton feedstock ≈ ±$0.20–0.30/GGE product
  • Conversion yield: 1% absolute yield improvement ≈ 2–3% MFSP reduction
  • Catalyst lifetime: Doubling catalyst lifetime ≈50% catalyst cost reduction
  • Plant capacity utilization: 90% vs. 70% uptime ≈15–25% MFSP impact
  • Co-product value: ±$100/ton co-product ≈ ±$0.15–0.25/GGE product

12.4 Pathway-specific economic assessments

For reductive catalytic fractionation of lignin discussed extensively in Section 6 detailed TEA reveals challenging economics. Bartling et al. (2021) analyzed RCF producing lignin-derived aromatic oil alongside cellulosic sugars using Ni/C catalysts. Base case analysis calculated minimum selling price for RCF oil of $1.13/kg, compared to $0.60–0.80/kg for petroleum-derived aromatics, indicating a 40%–90% price premium. Capital costs dominated economics at $564 million for a 2000 ton/day facility, with high-pressure RCF reactors comprising 57% of total CAPEX. Sensitivity analysis identified energy consumption for solvent recovery (consuming 73% of feedstock energy content) as a critical cost driver. Importantly, the analysis assumed catalyst lifetime of 5000 kg biomass/kg catalyst 10–50× higher than demonstrated in published studies, highlighting the gap between laboratory performance and commercial requirements (Bartling et al., 2021).

12.5 Technology learning and cost reduction projections

Technology learning curves project cost evolution with cumulative deployment, informing policy support requirements and commercialization timelines. Biomass conversion technologies typically exhibit learning rates of 15%–25%, meaning costs decrease 15%–25% with each doubling of cumulative capacity. Analysis of second-generation bioethanol projected production costs declining from $1.20/L in 2020 to potentially $0.65/L by 2030 through combined effects of technology learning, scale-up, and process optimization (Vasilakou et al., 2023).

13 Conclusions and future perspectives

Metal-based catalysis has emerged as a cornerstone technology for lignocellulosic biomass valorization, enabling the production of fuels, chemicals, and materials from renewable feedstocks (Serrano-Ruiz et al., 2011; Corma et al., 2007b). This review has highlighted the remarkable progress achieved in developing catalytic systems for conversion of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, while identifying persistent challenges that must be addressed for commercial implementation.

Several key themes emerge from the current state of the art. First, the development of bifunctional catalysts that integrate metal sites with acidic or basic functionalities has enabled one-pot transformations that minimize processing steps and improve overall efficiency (Wettstein et al., 2012). Second, earth-abundant transition metal catalysts based on Ni, Co, and Cu have demonstrated performance approaching that of noble metals for many reactions, addressing cost and sustainability concerns (Chirik and Morris, 2015; Bullock et al., 2020). Third, advanced catalyst design strategies including single-atom catalysis, bimetallic synergies, and nanoconfinement offer new opportunities to enhance activity, selectivity, and stability (Wang et al., 2018; Mitchell et al., 2018).

The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning to catalyst discovery promises to accelerate the identification of optimal formulations from the vast compositional space of multicomponent catalysts (Butler et al., 2018). Finally, the development of modular, intensified processes that can be deployed at scales matching biomass availability may address the logistics challenges associated with distributed biomass resources (Wright et al., 2010). While challenges remain formidable, the progress reviewed herein demonstrates that metal-based catalysis is poised to play a central role in unlocking the chemical potential of lignocellulosic biomass for a sustainable future (Rinaldi and Schuth, 2009).

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Gullapelli Sadanandam, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, India

Reviewed by: Arindam Modak, National Institute of Technology Agartala, India

Naeem Naeem, University of Lahore, Pakistan

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. TETFund Institution-based research grant for basic research awarded to Prof. O.OA.

Author contributions

OA: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. KK: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. UO: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. PG: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

References

  1. Abdelrahman O. A., Luo H. Y., Heyden A., Román-Leshkov Y., Bond J. Q. (2015). Toward rational design of stable, supported metal catalysts for aqueous-phase processing: insights from the hydrogenation of levulinic acid. J. Catal. 329, 10 – 21. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.04.026
  2. Abu-Omar M. M., Barta K., Beckham G. T., Luterbacher J. S., Ralph J., Rinaldi R. (2021). Guidelines for performing lignin-first biorefinery. Energy and Environ. Sci. 14 (1), 262 – 292. doi:10.1039/D0EE02870C
  3. Adler E. (1977). Lignin chemistry — past, present and future. Wood Sci. Technol. 11 (3), 169 – 218. doi:10.1007/BF00365315
  4. Alonso D. M., Bond J. Q., Dumesic J. A. (2010). Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem. 12 (9), 1493 – 1513. doi:10.1039/c004654j
  5. Alonso D. M., Wettstein S. G., Dumesic J. A. (2013). Gamma-valerolactone, a sustainable platform molecule derived from lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 15 (3), 584 – 595. doi:10.1039/c3gc37065h
  6. Andanson J.-M., Baiker A. (2010). Exploring catalytic solid/liquid interfaces by in situ attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (12), 4571 – 4584. doi:10.1039/c0cs00019a
  7. Anderson E. M., Katahira R., Reed M., Resch M. G., Karp E. M., Beckham G. T. (2016). Reductive catalytic fractionation of corn stover lignin. ACS Sustain. Chem. and Eng. 4 (12), 6940 – 6950. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01858
  8. Antal M. J., Mok W. S. L., Richards G. N. (1990). Mechanism of formation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde from d-fructose and sucrose. Carbohydr. Res. 199 (1), 91 – 109. doi:10.1016/0008-6215(90)84096-D
  9. Argyle M. D., Bartholomew C. H. (2015). Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review. Catalysts 5 (1), 145 – 269. doi:10.3390/catal5010145
  10. Astruc D., Lu F., Aranzaes J. R. (2005). Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: the frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (48), 7852 – 7872. doi:10.1002/anie.200500766
  11. Bañares M. A. (2005). Operando methodology: combination of in situ spectroscopy and simultaneous activity measurements under catalytic reaction conditions. Catal. Today 100 (1–2), 71 – 77. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.12.017
  12. Bartholomew C. H. (2001). Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl. Catal. A General 212 (1–2), 17 – 60. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7
  13. Bartling A. W., Renders T., Van den Bosch S., Schutyser W., Koelewijn S. F., Sels B. F. (2021). Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery utilizing reductive catalytic fractionation. Energy and Environ. Sci. 14 (8), 4147 – 4168. doi:10.1039/D1EE01642C
  14. Beller M., Centi G., Sun L. (2017). Chemistry future: priorities and opportunities from the sustainability perspective. ChemSusChem 10 (1), 6 – 13. doi:10.1002/cssc.201601739
  15. Bermejo-Deval R., Assary R. S., Nikolla E., Moliner M., Román-Leshkov Y., Hwang S.-J. (2012). Metalloenzyme-like catalyzed isomerizations of sugars by Lewis acid zeolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (25), 9727 – 9732. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206708109
  16. Binder J. B., Raines R. T. (2009). Simple chemical transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into furans for fuels and chemicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (5), 1979 – 1985. doi:10.1021/ja808537j
  17. Boerjan W., Ralph J., Baucher M. (2003). Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 519 – 546. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938
  18. Bozell J. J., Petersen G. R. (2010). Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates — the US department of Energy's “Top 10” revisited. Green Chem. 12 (4), 539 – 554. doi:10.1039/b922014c
  19. Bui P., Cecilia J. A., Oyama S. T., Takagaki A., Infantes-Molina A., Zhao H. (2012). Studies of the synthesis of transition metal phosphides and their activity in the hydrodeoxygenation of a biofuel model compound. J. Catal. 294, 184 – 198. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.07.021
  20. Bullock R. M., Chen J. G., Gagliardi L., Chirik P. J., Farha O. K., Hendon C. H. (2020). Using nature's blueprint to expand catalysis with Earth-abundant metals. Science 369 (6505). doi:10.1126/science.abc3183
  21. Butler K. T., Davies D. W., Cartwright H., Isayev O., Walsh A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559 (7715), 547 – 555. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2
  22. Calvo-Flores F. G., Dobado J. A. (2010). Lignin as renewable raw material. ChemSusChem 3 (11), 1227 – 1235. doi:10.1002/cssc.201000157
  23. Campbell C. T. (2013). The energetics of supported metal nanoparticles: relationships to sintering rates and catalytic activity. Accounts Chem. Res. 46 (8), 1712 – 1719. doi:10.1021/ar3003514
  24. Castro J. S., Sganzerla W. G., Mussatto S. I., Forster-Carneiro T. (2023). Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis for biofuel and biofertilizer recovery from microalgae. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 187. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113781
  25. Chakar F. S., Ragauskas A. J. (2004). Review of current and future softwood kraft lignin process chemistry. Industrial Crops Prod. 20 (2), 131 – 141. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.016
  26. Chatterjee M., Ishizaka T., Kawanami H. (2014). Hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in supercritical carbon dioxide–water: a tunable approach to dimethylfuran selectivity. Green Chem. 16 (11), 4734 – 4739. doi:10.1039/C4GC01271B
  27. Cherubini F. (2010). The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers. Manag. 51 (7), 1412 – 1421. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015
  28. Chen C., Zhang J., Zhao Y., Guo X., Dong C.-L., Liu R.-S. (2018). Single platinum atoms immobilized on an MXene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nature Catalysis, 1 (12), 985 – 992. doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0195-1
  29. Cherubini F., Strømman A. H. (2011). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (2), 437 – 451. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010
  30. Cherubini F., Peters G. P., Berntsen T., Strømman A. H., Hertwich E. (2011). CO 2 emissions from biomass combustion: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3 (5), 413 – 426. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01102.x
  31. Chheda J. N., Dumesic J. A. (2007). An overview of dehydration, aldol-condensation and hydrogenation processes for production of liquid alkanes from biomass-derived carbohydrates. Catal. Today 123 (1–4), 59 – 70. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2006.12.006
  32. Chheda J. N., Huber G. W., Dumesic J. A. (2007). Liquid-phase catalytic processing of biomass-derived oxygenated hydrocarbons to fuels and chemicals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (38), 7164 – 7183. doi:10.1002/anie.200604274
  33. Chirik P. J., Morris R. H. (2015). Getting down to earth: the renaissance of catalysis with abundant metals. Accounts Chem. Res. 48 (11), 2495 – 2507. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00385
  34. Climent M. J., Corma A., Iborra S. (2014a). Conversion of biomass platform molecules into fuel additives and liquid hydrocarbon fuels. Green Chem. 16 (2), 516 – 547. doi:10.1039/C3GC41492B
  35. Climent M. J., Corma A., Iborra S., Sabater M. J. (2014b). Heterogeneous catalysis for tandem reactions. ACS Catal. 4 (3), 870 – 891. doi:10.1021/cs401052k
  36. Corma A., Huber G. W. (2007). Synergies between bio- and oil refineries for the production of fuels from biomass. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (38), 7184 – 7201. doi:10.1002/anie.200604504
  37. Corma A., Huber G. W., Sauvanaud L., O'Connor P. (2007a). Processing biomass-derived oxygenates in the oil refinery: catalytic cracking (FCC) reaction pathways and role of catalyst. J. Catal. 247 (2), 307 – 327. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.01.023
  38. Corma A., Iborra S., Velty A. (2007b). Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals. Chem. Rev. 107 (6), 2411 – 2502. doi:10.1021/cr050989d
  39. Cortright R. D., Davda R. R., Dumesic J. A. (2002). Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature 418 (6901), 964 – 967. doi:10.1038/nature01009
  40. Crestini C., Crucianelli M., Orlandi M., Saladino R. (2010). Oxidative strategies in lignin chemistry: a new environmental friendly approach for the functionalisation of lignin and lignocellulosic fibers. Catal. Today 156 (1–2), 8 – 22. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.03.057
  41. Dauenhauer P. J., Huber G. W. (2014). Biomass at the shale gas crossroads. Green Chem. 16 (2), 382 – 386. doi:10.1039/C4GC90001D
  42. Davda R. R., Shabaker J. W., Huber G. W., Cortright R. D., Dumesic J. A. (2005). A review of catalytic issues and process conditions for renewable hydrogen and alkanes by aqueous-phase reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons over supported metal catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 56 (1–2), 171 – 186. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.04.027
  43. Davis R., Grundl N., Tao L., Biddy M. J., Tan E. C. D., Beckham G. T. (2018). Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbon fuels and coproducts: 2018 biochemical design case update; biochemical deconstruction and conversion of biomass to fuels and products via integrated biorefinery pathways. CO, United States: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). doi:10.2172/1483234
  44. Davis R., Evans A., Klein B. (2024). Technology case study: sustainable aviation fuel via catalytic conversion of sugars. CO, United States: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available online at:.
  45. Deng D., Novoselov K. S., Fu Q., Zheng N., Tian Z., Bao X. (2016). Catalysis with two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 (3), 218 – 230. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.340
  46. Dincer I., Acar C. (2015). Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (34), 11094 – 11111. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
  47. Dumesic J., Shabaker J., Davda R., Huber G., Cortright R. (2003). Aqueous-phase reforming of methanol and ethylene glycol over alumina-supported platinum catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 215 (2), 344 – 352. doi:10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00032-0
  48. Dutta S., De S., Saha B. (2012). A brief summary of the synthesis of polyester building-block chemicals and biofuels from 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemPlusChem 77 (4), 259 – 272. doi:10.1002/cplu.201100035
  49. Ferrini P., Rinaldi R. (2014). Catalytic biorefining of plant biomass to non-pyrolytic lignin bio-oil and carbohydrates through hydrogen transfer reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (33), 8634 – 8639. doi:10.1002/anie.201403747
  50. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M. (2014). Gold atoms stabilized on various supports catalyze the water-gas shift reaction. Accounts Chem. Res. 47 (3), 783 – 792. doi:10.1021/ar4001845
  51. Frenkel A. I., Rodriguez J. A., Chen J. G. (2012). Synchrotron techniques for in situ catalytic studies: capabilities, challenges, and opportunities. ACS Catal. 2 (11), 2269 – 2280. doi:10.1021/cs3004006
  52. Fukuoka A., Dhepe P. L. (2006). Catalytic conversion of cellulose into sugar alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (31), 5161 – 5163. doi:10.1002/anie.200601921
  53. Furimsky E. (2000). Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Appl. Catal. A General 199 (2), 147 – 190. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00555-4
  54. Galkin M. V., Samec J. S. M. (2016). Lignin valorization through catalytic lignocellulose fractionation: a fundamental platform for the future biorefinery. ChemSusChem 9 (13), 1544 – 1558. doi:10.1002/cssc.201600237
  55. Gallezot P. (2012). Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (4), 1538 – 1558. doi:10.1039/c1cs15147a
  56. Gallezot P., Richard D. (1998). Selective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. Catal. Rev. 40 (1–2), 81 – 126. doi:10.1080/01614949808007106
  57. Gallezot P., Nicolaus N., Flèche G., Fuertes P., Perrard A. (1998). Glucose hydrogenation on ruthenium catalysts in a trickle-bed reactor. J. Catal. 180 (1), 51 – 55. doi:10.1006/jcat.1998.2271
  58. Gilkey M. J., Xu B. (2016). Heterogeneous catalytic transfer hydrogenation as an effective pathway in biomass upgrading. ACS Catal. 6 (3), 1420 – 1436. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b02171
  59. Gilkey M. J., Panagiotopoulou P., Mironenko A. V., Jenness G. R., Vlachos D. G., Xu B. (2015). Mechanistic insights into metal Lewis acid-mediated catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural to 2-methylfuran. ACS Catal. 5 (7), 3988 – 3994. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b00586
  60. Gilroy K. D., Ruditskiy A., Peng H. C., Qin D., Xia Y. (2016). Bimetallic nanocrystals: syntheses, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 116 (18), 10414 – 10472. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00211
  61. Gírio F. M., Fonseca C., Carvalheiro F., Duarte L. C., Marques S., Bogel-Łukasik R. (2010). Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 101 (13), 4775 – 4800. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.088
  62. Girisuta B., Janssen L. P. B. M., Heeres H. J. (2006). A kinetic study on the decomposition of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into levulinic acid. Green Chem. 8 (8), 701 – 709. doi:10.1039/b518176c
  63. Goel S., Wu Z., Zones S. I., Iglesia E. (2014). Encapsulation of metal clusters within MFI via interzeolite transformations and direct hydrothermal syntheses and catalytic consequences of their confinement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (43), 15280 – 15290. doi:10.1021/ja507956m
  64. Greeley J., Jaramillo T. F., Bonde J., Chorkendorff I., Nørskov J. K. (2006). Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 5 (11), 909 – 913. doi:10.1038/nmat1752
  65. Gubin K., Mikheeva N., Vlaskin M. (2024). Hydrogen production from woody biomass gasification: a techno-economic analysis. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 18 (3), 892 – 908. doi:10.1002/bbb.2647
  66. Hall C. A. S., Balogh S., Murphy D. J. R. (2009). What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2 (1), 25 – 47. doi:10.3390/en20100025
  67. Hammer B., Nørskov J. K. (2000). Theoretical surface science and catalysis — calculations and concepts. Adv. Catal. 45, 71 – 129. doi:10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45013-4
  68. Hanson S. K., Wu R., Silks L. A. P. (2012). C–C or C–O bond cleavage in a phenolic lignin model compound: selectivity depends on vanadium catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (14), 3410 – 3413. doi:10.1002/anie.201107020
  69. He L., Qian Y., Ding R. S., Liu Y. M., Cao Y. (2016). Cascade catalytic transfer hydrogenation-cyclization of ethyl levulinate to γ-valerolactone with Al-Zr mixed oxides. Appl. Catal. A General 510, 11 – 19. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2015.10.039
  70. Himmel M. E., Ding S. Y., Johnson D. K., Adney W. S., Nimlos M. R., Brady J. W. (2007). Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315 (5813), 804 – 807. doi:10.1126/science.1137016
  71. Holladay J. E., White J. F., Bozell J. J., Johnson D. (2007). Top value-added chemicals from biomass — volume II — results of screening for potential candidates from biorefinery lignin. Washington, DC: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
  72. Holladay J. D., Hu J., King D. L., Wang Y. (2009). An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal. Today 139 (4), 244 – 260. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039
  73. Horváth I. T., Mehdi H., Fábos V., Boda L., Mika L. T. (2008). γ-Valerolactone — a sustainable liquid for energy and carbon-based chemicals. Green Chem. 10 (2), 238 – 242. doi:10.1039/b712863k
  74. Humbird D., Davis R., Tao L., Kinchin C., Hsu D., Aden A. (2011). Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol (Report No. NREL/TP-5100-47764). CO, United States: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available online at:.
  75. IEA Bioenergy Task 38 (2013). Using life cycle assessment to estimate GHG emissions of bioenergy. Sao Paulo, Brazil: IEA Bioenergy Report. Available online at:.
  76. Iglesia E. (1997). Design, synthesis, and use of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Appl. Catal. A General 161 (1–2), 59 – 78. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00399-7
  77. Ignatchenko A., DeRaddo J., Marino V., Mercado A. (2012). Cross-selectivity in the catalytic ketonization of carboxylic acids. ACS Catal. 2 (7), 1555 – 1562. doi:10.1021/cs300140p
  78. Iisa K., Dutta A., Orton K. A., French R. J., Griffin M. B., Schaidle J. A. (2023). Biomass to fuel blendstocks via catalytic fast pyrolysis and hydrotreating. ACS Sustain. Chem. and Eng. 11 (23), 8567 – 8577. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01580
  79. Ji N., Zhang T., Zheng M., Wang A., Wang H., Wang X. (2008). Direct catalytic conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol using nickel-promoted tungsten carbide catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (44), 8510 – 8513. doi:10.1002/anie.200803233
  80. Jones W. D. (2003). Isotope effects in C-H bond activation reactions by transition metals. Accounts Chem. Res. 36 (3), 140 – 146. doi:10.1021/ar020148i
  81. Khodakov A. Y., Chu W., Fongarland P. (2007). Advances in the development of novel cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons and clean fuels. Chem. Rev. 107 (5), 1692 – 1744. doi:10.1021/cr050972v
  82. King C. W., Holman A. S., Webber M. E. (2010). Water intensity of transportation. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 44 (11), 4022 – 4028. doi:10.1021/es903584h
  83. Kiss A. A. (2013). “ Separating reactive mixtures using advanced distillation,” in Process Intensification Technologies for Green Chemistry (Wiley), 203 – 230.
  84. Klein I., Saha B., Abu-Omar M. M. (2015). Lignin depolymerization over Ni/C catalyst in methanol, a continuation: effect of substrate and catalyst loading. Catal. Sci. and Technol. 5 (6), 3242 – 3245. doi:10.1039/C5CY00490J
  85. Klemm D., Heublein B., Fink H. P., Bohn A. (2005). Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (22), 3358 – 3393. doi:10.1002/anie.200460587
  86. Kobayashi H., Fukuoka A. (2013). Synthesis and utilisation of sugar compounds derived from lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 15 (7), 1740 – 1763. doi:10.1039/c3gc00060e
  87. Komanoya T., Kobayashi H., Hara K., Chun W. J., Fukuoka A. (2011). Catalysis and characterization of carbon-supported ruthenium for cellulose hydrolysis. Appl. Catal. A General 407 (1–2), 188 – 194. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.039
  88. Koso S., Ueda N., Shinmi Y., Okumura K., Kizuka T., Tomishige K. (2009). Promoting effect of Mo on the hydrogenolysis of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to 1,5-pentanediol over Rh/SiO 2. J. Catal. 267 (1), 89 – 92. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.07.016
  89. Kuster B. F. M. (1990). 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): a review focussing on its manufacture. Starch/Stärke 42 (8), 314 – 321. doi:10.1002/star.19900420808
  90. Kusunoki Y., Miyazawa T., Kunimori K., Tomishige K. (2005). Highly active metal-acid bifunctional catalyst system for hydrogenolysis of glycerol under mild reaction conditions. Catal. Commun. 6 (9), 645 – 649. doi:10.1016/j.catcom.2005.06.006
  91. Lange J. P. (2015). Renewable feedstocks: the problem of catalyst deactivation and its mitigation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (45), 13186 – 13197. doi:10.1002/anie.201503595
  92. Lee W. S., Wang Z., Wu R. J., Bhan A. (2014). Selective vapor-phase hydrodeoxygenation of anisole to benzene on molybdenum carbide catalysts. J. Catal. 319, 44 – 53. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.07.025
  93. Lee L. C., Lu J., Weck M., Jones C. W. (2016). Acid-base bifunctional shell cross-linked micelle nanoreactor for one-pot tandem reaction. ACS Catal. 6 (2), 784 – 787. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b02267
  94. Lin L., Yao S., Gao R., Liang X., Yu Q., Deng Y. (2019). A highly CO-tolerant atomically dispersed Pt catalyst for chemoselective hydrogenation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 (4), 354 – 361. doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0366-5
  95. Liu Y., Luo C., Liu H. (2012). Tungsten trioxide promoted selective conversion of cellulose into propylene glycol and ethylene glycol on a ruthenium catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (13), 3249 – 3253. doi:10.1002/anie.201200351
  96. Liu J. (2016). Catalysis by supported single metal atoms. ACS Catal. 7 (1), 34 – 59. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01534
  97. Ludwig J. R., Phan S., McAtee C. C., Zimmerman P. M., Devery J. J. III, Schindler C. S. (2017). Mechanistic investigations of the iron(III)-catalyzed carbonyl-olefin metathesis reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (31), 10832 – 10842. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05641
  98. Luo C., Wang S., Liu H. (2007). Cellulose conversion into polyols catalyzed by reversibly formed acids and supported ruthenium clusters in hot water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46 (40), 7636 – 7639. doi:10.1002/anie.200702661
  99. Luterbacher J. S., Alonso D. M., Dumesic J. A. (2014). Targeted chemical upgrading of lignocellulosic biomass to platform molecules. Green Chem. 16 (12), 4816 – 4838. doi:10.1039/c4gc01160k
  100. Ma R., Xu Y., Zhang X. (2015). Catalytic oxidation of biorefinery lignin to value-added chemicals to support sustainable biofuel production. ChemSusChem 8 (1), 24 – 51. doi:10.1002/cssc.201402503
  101. Mäki-Arvela P., Hájek J., Salmi T., Murzin D. Y. (2005). Chemoselective hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds over heterogeneous catalysts. Appl. Catal. A General 292, 1 – 49. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.045
  102. Mallat T., Baiker A. (2004). Oxidation of alcohols with molecular oxygen on solid catalysts. Chem. Rev. 104 (6), 3037 – 3058. doi:10.1021/cr0300116
  103. Mamman A. S., Lee J. M., Kim Y. C., Hwang I. T., Park N. J., Hwang Y. K. (2008). Furfural: Hemicellulose/xylose-derived biochemical. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 2 (5), 438 – 454. doi:10.1002/bbb.95
  104. Maris E. P., Davis R. J. (2007). Hydrogenolysis of glycerol over carbon-supported Ru and Pt catalysts. J. Catal. 249, 328 – 337. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.008
  105. Mariscal R., Maireles-Torres P., Ojeda M., Sádaba I., Granados M. L. (2016). Furfural: a renewable and versatile platform molecule for the synthesis of chemicals and fuels. Energy and Environ. Sci. 9 (4), 1144 – 1189. doi:10.1039/C5EE02666K
  106. Mayes H. B., Broadbelt L. J. (2012). Unimolecular decomposition pathways of levoglucosan. J. Phys. Chem. A 116 (26), 7098 – 7106. doi:10.1021/jp303296k
  107. Medford A. J., Vojvodic A., Hummelshøj J. S., Voss J., Abild-Pedersen F., Studt F. (2015). From the Sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 328, 36 – 42. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.033
  108. Mettler M. S., Paulsen A. D., Vlachos D. G., Dauenhauer P. J. (2012). Pyrolytic conversion of cellulose to fuels: levoglucosan deoxygenation via elimination and cyclization within molten biomass. Energy and Environ. Sci. 5 (7), 7864 – 7868. doi:10.1039/c2ee21305b
  109. Michel C., Gallezot P. (2015). Why is ruthenium an efficient catalyst for the aqueous-phase hydrogenation of biosourced carbonyl compounds? ACS Catal. 5 (7), 4130 – 4132. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b00722
  110. Mitchell S., Vorobyeva E., Pérez-Ramírez J. (2018). The multifaceted reactivity of single-atom heterogeneous catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (50), 15316 – 15329. doi:10.1002/anie.201806936
  111. Miyazawa T., Kusunoki Y., Kunimori K., Tomishige K. (2006). Glycerol conversion in the aqueous solution under hydrogen over Ru/C + an ion-exchange resin and its reaction mechanism. J. Catal. 240 (2), 213 – 221. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.03.023
  112. Moliner M., Román-Leshkov Y., Davis M. E. (2010). Tin-containing zeolites are highly active catalysts for the isomerization of glucose in water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (14), 6164 – 6168. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002358107
  113. Moulijn J. A., van Diepen A. E., Kapteijn F. (2001). Catalyst deactivation: is it predictable? What to do? Appl. Catal. A General 212 (1–2), 3 – 16. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00842-5
  114. Nagaraja B. M., Kumar V. S., Shasikala V., Padmasri A. H., Sreedhar B., Raju B. D. (2003). A highly efficient Cu/MgO catalyst for vapour phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol. Catal. Commun. 4 (6), 287 – 293. doi:10.1016/S1566-7367(03)00068-2
  115. Nakagawa Y., Tomishige K. (2010). Heterogeneous catalysis of the glycerol hydrogenolysis. Catal. Sci. and Technol. 1 (2), 179 – 190. doi:10.1039/c0cy00054j
  116. Nakagawa Y., Tamura M., Tomishige K. (2013). Catalytic reduction of biomass-derived furanic compounds with hydrogen. ACS Catal. 3 (12), 2655 – 2668. doi:10.1021/cs400616p
  117. Newton M. A. (2008). Dynamic adsorbate/reaction induced structural change of supported metal nanoparticles: heterogeneous catalysis and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 (12), 2644 – 2657. doi:10.1039/B707746G
  118. Nikolla E., Román-Leshkov Y., Moliner M., Davis M. E. (2011). One-pot synthesis of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural from carbohydrates using tin-beta zeolite. ACS Catal. 1 (4), 408 – 410. doi:10.1021/cs2000544
  119. Nishimura S. (2001). Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation for Organic Synthesis. Wiley-Interscience.
  120. Nishiyama Y., Sugiyama J., Chanzy H., Langan P. (2003). Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (47), 14300 – 14306. doi:10.1021/ja037055w
  121. Nørskov J. K., Bligaard T., Rossmeisl J., Christensen C. H. (2009). Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 1 (1), 37 – 46. doi:10.1038/nchem.121
  122. Nørskov J. K., Abild-Pedersen F., Studt F., Bligaard T. (2011). Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (3), 937 – 943. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006652108
  123. Op de Beeck B., Dusselier M., Geboers J., Holsbeeke J., Morales E., Giebeler L. (2015). Direct catalytic conversion of cellulose to liquid straight-chain alkanes. Energy and Environ. Sci. 8 (1), 230 – 240. doi:10.1039/c4ee01523a
  124. Palkovits R., Tajvidi K., Procelewska J., Rinaldi R., Ruppert A. (2010). Hydrogenolysis of cellulose combining mineral acids and hydrogenation catalysts. Green Chem. 12 (6), 972 – 978. doi:10.1039/b920957c
  125. Panagiotopoulou P., Vlachos D. G. (2014). Liquid phase catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural over a Ru/C catalyst. Appl. Catal. A General 480, 17 – 24. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2014.04.018
  126. Pang J., Zheng M., Sun R., Wang A., Wang X., Zhang T. (2016). Synthesis of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid from biomass for producing PET. Green Chem. 18 (2), 342 – 359. doi:10.1039/C5GC01771F
  127. Park S., Baker J. O., Himmel M. E., Parilla P. A., Johnson D. K. (2010). Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol. Biofuels 3, 10. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10
  128. Parthasarathi R., Romero R. A., Redondo A., Gnanakaran S. (2011). Theoretical study of the remarkably diverse linkages in lignin. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 (20), 2660 – 2666. doi:10.1021/jz201201q
  129. Pauly M., Keegstra K. (2008). Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 54 (4), 559 – 568. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03463.x
  130. Peña M. A., Fierro J. L. (2001). Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem. Rev. 101 (7), 1981 – 2017. doi:10.1021/cr980129f
  131. Prasomsri T., Nimmanwudipong T., Román-Leshkov Y. (2013). Effective hydrodeoxygenation of biomass-derived oxygenates into unsaturated hydrocarbons by MoO 3 using low H 2 pressures. Energy and Environ. Sci. 6 (6), 1732 – 1738. doi:10.1039/C3EE24360E
  132. Prati L., Porta F. (2005). Oxidation of alcohols: recyclability of supported gold catalysts in liquid phase. Appl. Catal. A General 291 (1–2), 199 – 203. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2004.12.008
  133. Prieto G., Tüysüz H., Duyckaerts N., Knossalla J., Wang G.-H., Schüth F. (2016). Hollow nano- and microstructures as catalysts. Chem. Rev. 116 (22), 14056 – 14119. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00374
  134. Qiao B., Wang A., Yang X., Allard L. F., Jiang Z., Cui Y. (2011). Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt 1 /FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3 (8), 634 – 641. doi:10.1038/nchem.1095
  135. Ragauskas A. J., Beckham G. T., Biddy M. J., Chandra R., Chen F., Davis M. F. (2014). Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 344 (6185), 1246843. doi:10.1126/science.1246843
  136. Rahimi A., Ulbrich A., Coon J. J., Stahl S. S. (2014). Formic-acid-induced depolymerization of oxidized lignin to aromatics. Nature 515 (7526), 249 – 252. doi:10.1038/nature13867
  137. Ralph J., Lundquist K., Brunow G., Lu F., Kim H., Schatz P. F. (2004). Lignins: natural polymers from oxidative coupling of 4-hydroxyphenyl-propanoids. Phytochem. Rev. 3 (1–2), 29 – 60. doi:10.1023/B:PHYT.0000047809.65444.a4
  138. Renders T., Van den Bosch S., Koelewijn S.-F., Schutyser W., Sels B. F. (2017). Lignin-first biomass fractionation: the advent of active stabilisation strategies. Energy and Environ. Sci. 10 (7), 1551 – 1557. doi:10.1039/C7EE01298E
  139. Rinaldi R., Schüth F. (2009). Acid hydrolysis of cellulose as the entry point into biorefinery schemes. ChemSusChem 2 (12), 1096 – 1107. doi:10.1002/cssc.200900188
  140. Robinson A. M., Hensley J. E., Medlin J. W. (2016). Bifunctional catalysts for upgrading of biomass-derived oxygenates: a review. ACS Catal. 6 (8), 5026 – 5043. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b00923
  141. Rodriguez J. A., Goodman D. W. (1992). The nature of the metal-metal bond in bimetallic surfaces. Science 257 (5072), 897 – 903. doi:10.1126/science.257.5072.897
  142. Román-Leshkov Y., Barrett C. J., Liu Z. Y., Dumesic J. A. (2007). Production of dimethylfuran for liquid fuels from biomass-derived carbohydrates. Nature 447 (7147), 982 – 985. doi:10.1038/nature05923
  143. Rosatella A. A., Simeonov S. P., Frade R. F. M., Afonso C. A. M. (2011). 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a building block platform: biological properties, synthesis and synthetic applications. Green Chem. 13 (4), 754 – 793. doi:10.1039/c0gc00401d
  144. Rosales Calderon O., Tao L., Abdullah Z., Moriarty K., Smolinski S., Milbrandt A. (2024). Sustainable aviation fuel state-of-industry report: hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids pathway. NREL/TP-5100-87803 Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). doi:10.2172/2426563
  145. Ruppert A. M., Weinberg K., Palkovits R. (2012). Hydrogenolysis goes bio: from carbohydrates and sugar alcohols to platform chemicals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (11), 2564 – 2601. doi:10.1002/anie.201105125
  146. Ryczkowski J. (2001). IR spectroscopy in catalysis. Catal. Today 68 (4), 263 – 381. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00334-0
  147. Sacchi R., Terlouw T., Siala K., Dirnaichner A., Bauer C., Cox B. (2022). PRospective EnvironMental impact asSEment (premise): a streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 160, 112311. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112311
  148. Saha B. C. (2003). Hemicellulose bioconversion. J. Industrial Microbiol. and Biotechnol. 30 (5), 279 – 291. doi:10.1007/s10295-003-0049-x
  149. Salciccioli M., Stamatakis M., Caratzoulas S., Vlachos D. G. (2011). A review of multiscale modeling of metal-catalyzed reactions: mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66 (19), 4319 – 4355. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.050
  150. Sankar M., Dimitratos N., Miedziak P. J., Wells P. P., Kiely C. J., Hutchings G. J. (2012). Designing bimetallic catalysts for a green and sustainable future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (24), 8099 – 8139. doi:10.1039/c2cs35296f
  151. Scheller H. V., Ulvskov P. (2010). Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 263 – 289. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315
  152. Schlögl R. (2015). Heterogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (11), 3465 – 3520. doi:10.1002/anie.201410738
  153. Schutyser W., Renders T., Van den Bosch S., Koelewijn S.-F., Beckham G. T., Sels B. F. (2018). Chemicals from lignin: an interplay of lignocellulose fractionation, depolymerisation, and upgrading. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (3), 852 – 908. doi:10.1039/C7CS00566K
  154. Sedai B., Díaz-Urrutia C., Baker R. T., Wu R., Silks L. A. P., Hanson S. K. (2013). Aerobic oxidation of β-1 lignin model compounds with copper and oxovanadium catalysts. ACS Catal. 3 (12), 3111 – 3122. doi:10.1021/cs400636k
  155. Seh Z. W., Kibsgaard J., Dickens C. F., Chorkendorff I., Nørskov J. K., Jaramillo T. F. (2017). Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355 (6321), eaad4998. doi:10.1126/science.aad4998
  156. Serrano-Ruiz J. C., Luque R., Sepúlveda-Escribano A. (2011). Transformations of biomass-derived platform molecules: from high added-value chemicals to fuels via aqueous-phase processing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (11), 5266 – 5281. doi:10.1039/c1cs15131b
  157. Shuai L., Amiri M. T., Questell-Santiago Y. M., Héroguel F., Li Y., Kim H. (2016). Formaldehyde stabilization facilitates lignin monomer production during biomass depolymerization. Science 354 (6310), 329 – 333. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7810
  158. Simmons E. M., Hartwig J. F. (2012). On the interpretation of deuterium kinetic isotope effects in C–H bond functionalizations by transition-metal complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (13), 3066 – 3072. doi:10.1002/anie.201107334
  159. Sinfelt J. H. (1983). Bimetallic Catalysts: Discoveries, Concepts and Applications. Wiley.
  160. Sitthisa S., Resasco D. E. (2011). Hydrodeoxygenation of furfural over supported metal catalysts: a comparative study of Cu, Pd and Ni. Catal. Lett. 141 (6), 784 – 791. doi:10.1007/s10562-011-0581-7
  161. Sitthisa S., Pham T., Prasomsri T., Sooknoi T., Mallinson R. G., Resasco D. E. (2011). Conversion of furfural and 2-methylpentanal on Pd/SiO 2 and Pd–Cu/SiO 2 catalysts. J. Catal. 280 (1), 17 – 27. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2011.02.006
  162. Son S., Toste F. D. (2010). Non-oxidative vanadium-catalyzed C–O bond cleavage: application to degradation of lignin model compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (22), 3791 – 3794. doi:10.1002/anie.201001293
  163. Song Q., Wang F., Cai J., Wang Y., Zhang J., Yu W. (2013). Lignin depolymerization (LDP) in alcohol over nickel-based catalysts via a fragmentation–hydrogenolysis process. Energy and Environ. Sci. 6 (3), 994 – 1007. doi:10.1039/c2ee23741e
  164. Stankiewicz A. I., Moulijn J. A. (2000). Process intensification: transforming chemical engineering. Chem. Eng. Prog. 96 (1), 22 – 34.
  165. Studt F., Abild-Pedersen F., Bligaard T., Sørensen R. Z., Christensen C. H., Nørskov J. K. (2008). Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Science 320 (5881), 1320 – 1322. doi:10.1126/science.1156660
  166. Sun Z., Fridrich B., de Santi A., Elangovan S., Barta K. (2018). Bright side of lignin depolymerization: toward new platform chemicals. Chem. Rev. 118 (2), 614 – 678. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588
  167. Takahashi K., Takahashi L., Miyazato I., Fujima J., Tanaka Y., Uno T. (2019). The rise of catalyst informatics: towards catalyst genomics. ChemCatChem 11 (4), 1146 – 1152. doi:10.1002/cctc.201801956
  168. Tauster S. J., Fung S. C., Baker R. T. K., Horsley J. A. (1981). Strong interactions in supported-metal catalysts. Science 211 (4487), 1121 – 1125. doi:10.1126/science.211.4487.1121
  169. Therrien A. J., Hensley A. J. R., Marcinkowski M. D., Zhang R., Lucci F. R., Coughlin B. (2018). An atomic-scale view of single-site Pt catalysis for low-temperature CO oxidation. Nat. Catal. 1 (3), 192 – 198. doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0028-2
  170. Tinnemans S. J., Mesu J. G., Kervinen K., Visser T., Nijhuis T. A., Beale A. M. (2006). Combining operando techniques in one spectroscopic-reaction cell: new opportunities for elucidating the active site and related reaction mechanism in catalysis. Catal. Today 113 (1–2), 3 – 15. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.076
  171. Topsøe H. (2003). Developments in operando studies and in situ characterization of heterogeneous catalysts. J. Catal. 216 (1–2), 155 – 164. doi:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00133-1
  172. Tran K., Ulissi Z. W. (2018). Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery and quantify uncertainty. Nat. Catal. 1 (9), 696 – 703. doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0142-1
  173. Turner J. A. (2004). Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305 (5686), 972 – 974. doi:10.1126/science.1103197
  174. Tuxen A., Carenco S., Chintapalli M., Chuang C. H., Escudero C., Pach E. (2013). Size-dependent dissociation of carbon monoxide on cobalt nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 135 (6), 2273 – 2278. doi:10.1021/ja3105889
  175. Ulissi Z. W., Medford A. J., Bligaard T., Nørskov J. K. (2017). To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14621. doi:10.1038/ncomms14621
  176. Ursúa A., Gandía L. M., Sanchis P. (2012). Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: current status and future trends. Proc. IEEE 100 (2), 410 – 426. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2156750
  177. U.S. Department of Energy (2025). Best practices for life cycle assessment of biomass carbon removal and storage technologies. Office Fossil Energy Carbon Manag.
  178. Van de Vyver S., Geboers J., Jacobs P. A., Sels B. F. (2011). Recent advances in the catalytic conversion of cellulose. ChemCatChem 3 (1), 82 – 94. doi:10.1002/cctc.201000302
  179. Van den Bosch S., Schutyser W., Vanholme R., Driessen T., Koelewijn S.-F., Renders T. (2015). Reductive lignocellulose fractionation into soluble lignin-derived phenolic monomers and dimers and processable carbohydrate pulps. Energy and Environ. Sci. 8 (6), 1748 – 1763. doi:10.1039/C5EE00204D
  180. Van Putten R.-J., Van der Waal J. C., De Jong E., Rasrendra C. B., Heeres H. J., De Vries J. G. (2013). Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources. Chem. Rev. 113 (3), 1499 – 1597. doi:10.1021/cr300182k
  181. Vasilakou K., Stavrakas V., Michas S., Flamos A. (2023). Assessing the future of second-generation bioethanol integrating technology learning curves. Appl. Energy 344. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121263
  182. Wang A., Zhang T. (2013). One-pot conversion of cellulose to ethylene glycol with multifunctional tungsten-based catalysts. Accounts Chem. Res. 46 (7), 1377 – 1386. doi:10.1021/ar3002156
  183. Wang M., Han J., Dunn J. B., Cai H., Elgowainy A. (2012). Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (4), 045905. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045905
  184. Wang H., Male J., Wang Y. (2013). Recent advances in hydrotreating of pyrolysis bio-oil and its oxygen-containing model compounds. ACS Catal. 3 (5), 1047 – 1070. doi:10.1021/cs400069z
  185. Wang A., Li J., Zhang T. (2018). Heterogeneous single-atom catalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2 (6), 65 – 81. doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1
  186. Wang Z., Ahmadi T., Green T., Henglein A., El-Sayed M. (1996). Shape-controlled synthesis of colloidal platinum nanoparticles. Science (New York, NY), 272 (5270), 1924 – 1926. doi:10.1126/science.272.5270.1924
  187. Waugh K. C. (1992). Methanol synthesis. Catal. Today 15 (1), 51 – 75. doi:10.1016/0920-5861(92)80122-4
  188. Weckhuysen B. M. (2003). Determining the active site in a catalytic process: operando spectroscopy is more than a buzzword. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5 (20), 4351 – 4360. doi:10.1039/B309650P
  189. Wei H., Liu X., Wang A., Zhang L., Qiao B., Yang X. (2014). FeOx-supported platinum single-atom and pseudo-single-atom catalysts for chemoselective hydrogenation of functionalized nitroarenes. Nat. Commun. 5, 5634. doi:10.1038/ncomms6634
  190. Werpy T., Petersen G. (2004). Top value added chemicals from biomass: volume I — results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. CO, United States: National Renewable Energy Laboratory/U.S. Department of Energy. Available online at:.
  191. Wettstein S. G., Alonso D. M., Gürbüz E. I., Dumesic J. A. (2012). A roadmap for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to chemicals and fuels. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 1 (3), 218 – 224. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2012.04.002
  192. Wheeldon I., Minteer S. D., Banta S., Barton S. C., Atanassov P., Sigman M. (2016). Substrate channelling as an approach to cascade reactions. Nat. Chem. 8 (4), 299 – 309. doi:10.1038/nchem.2459
  193. Wright M. M., Daugaard D. E., Satrio J. A., Brown R. C. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels. Fuel 89 (Suppl. 1), S2 – S10. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.029
  194. Xu C., Arancon R. A. D., Labidi J., Luque R. (2014). Lignin depolymerisation strategies: towards valuable chemicals and fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (22), 7485 – 7500. doi:10.1039/C4CS00235K
  195. Xu H., Ou L., Li Y., Hawkins T. R., Wang M. (2022). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biodiesel and renewable diesel production in the United States. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 56 (12), 7512 – 7521. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c00289
  196. Yamaguchi J., Takise R., Muto K., Itami K. (2014). Nickel catalyzed α arylation of ketones with phenol derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (26), 6791 – 6794. doi:10.1002/anie.201403823
  197. Yang X., Wang A., Qiao B., Li J., Liu J., Zhang T. (2013). Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Accounts Chem. Res. 46 (8), 1740 – 1748. doi:10.1021/ar300361m
  198. Yu W., Porosoff M., Chen J. (2012). Review of Pt-based bimetallic catalysis: from model surfaces to supported catalysts. Chemical Reviews 112 (11), 5780 – 5817. doi:10.1021/cr300096b
  199. Zakzeski J., Bruijnincx P. C. A., Jongerius A. L., Weckhuysen B. M. (2010). The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals. Chem. Rev. 110 (6), 3552 – 3599. doi:10.1021/cr900354u
  200. Zhao C., Kou Y., Lemonidou A. A., Li X., Lercher J. A. (2009). Highly selective catalytic conversion of phenolic bio-oil to alkanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (22), 3987 – 3990. doi:10.1002/anie.200900404
  201. Zhao C., He J., Lemonidou A. A., Li X., Lercher J. A. (2011). Aqueous-phase hydrodeoxygenation of bio-derived phenols to cycloalkanes. J. Catal. 280 (1), 8 – 16. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2011.02.001
  202. Zheng M., Wang A., Ji N., Pang J., Wang X., Zhang T. (2010). Transition metal–tungsten bimetallic catalysts for the conversion of cellulose into ethylene glycol. ChemSusChem 3 (1), 63 – 66. doi:10.1002/cssc.200900197
  203. Zheng M., Pang J., Sun R., Wang A., Wang X., Tao Z. (2016). Synthesis of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid from biomass for producing PET. Green Chemistry 18, 342 – 359. doi:10.1039/c5gc01771h
  204. Zhao Y., Wang Y., Jiang Y., Huang J., Liang J., Wang H. (2016). Effect of hierarchical crystal structures on the properties of cobalt catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Fuel, 174, 17 – 24. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.045
  205. Zhong L., Yu F., An Y., Zhao Y., Sun Y., Li Z. (2016). Cobalt carbide nanoprisms for direct production of lower olefins from syngas. Nature 538 (7623), 84 – 87. doi:10.1038/nature19786

Citation

Abosede, O. O., et al. (2026). Catalytic valorization of lignocellulosic biomass: progress, challenges, and emerging opportunities in metal-based catalysis. Frontiers in Catalysis, Volume 6. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
6 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Abosede, Kanu, Ogodo and Gabriel.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Olufunso O. Abosede

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0