Skip to content

Brief Research Report

Frontiers in Epidemiology ·

Volume 6 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2026.1874054

High prevalence of human coronaviruses in rural and urban Ghana in the post-COVID-19 era

  • Elvis Suatey Lomotey1,2,3
  • Martin Montiel-Ruiz4,5
  • Daniel Adjei Odumang3
  • Elizabeth Obeng-Aboagye1
  • Florence Biamah Amakye1
  • Joseph Annan Hayford1
  • Bernard Aniakwo Logonia1
  • Katharina Röltgen4,5
  • Irene Owusu Donkor1*corresponding author
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  2. 2West African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  3. 3Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  4. 4Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
  5. 5University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The prevalence and distribution of endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) in Ghana remain poorly characterized, particularly in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. We conducted a cross-sectional molecular and serological survey of 1,000 individuals from five rural and five urban communities in Ghana to assess the prevalence of HCoVs. Reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays targeted SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E, while serological assays evaluated IgG antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E Spike proteins. A broad pan-coronavirus RT-qPCR assay detected HCoV RNA in 6.7% of participants, with SARS-CoV-2 as the most frequent, followed by HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-OC43; HCoV-NL63 was not detected. Serological analyses revealed widespread exposure to SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-HKU1, with a low seroprevalence for HCoV-NL63. Our findings demonstrate ongoing co-circulation of multiple HCoVs in both rural and urban settings in Ghana post Covid-19, suggesting sustained community transmission, increased potential for co-infection, and the need for continued surveillance of endemic and emerging respiratory viruses. The data provides rare insights into the epidemiology of HCoVs in West Africa.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Seven human coronaviruses have been identified to date, including four endemic species (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E) that circulate globally, and three highly pathogenic viruses (SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) responsible for severe disease outbreaks. The epidemiology of the endemic species has been well characterized in the Northern hemisphere (1, 2), but data from West Africa remain limited, leaving important gaps in our understanding of their prevalence, circulation patterns, and seasonality.

Public health interventions and behavioral changes implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic have reportedly altered the global transmission dynamics of respiratory viruses, such as influenza viruses (3), and may similarly have influenced the epidemiology of HCoVs. SARS-CoV-2 itself has now also largely transitioned to an endemic pathogen, being both widespread and persistent, adding to the spectrum of respiratory infections that are endemic worldwide (4).

In Ghana, circulation of the four endemic HCoVs was documented prior to the pandemic, with marked seasonal variation in prevalence between the harmattan and wet seasons (5). Updated post-COVID-19 pandemic prevalence data from Ghana provide a critical opportunity to assess the current circulation of HCoVs and to establish a region-specific baseline to guide future surveillance efforts. To address this, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,000 individuals from ten communities—five rural and five urban—across the Greater Accra and Eastern Regions of Ghana. We used pan-coronavirus and HCoV-specific RT-qPCR assays to detect viral RNA as a measure of active infection, and multiplex serological assays to assess prior exposure.

2. Materials and methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional molecular and serological survey conducted between November and December 2022 in the Greater Accra and Eastern Regions of Ghana. The data presented here forms part of a larger coronavirus study conducted in rural and urban communities, with further methodological details described in (6). Briefly, urban settlements (Nsawam, Medie, Amasaman, Pokuase, and Ofankor) situated along the main highway between Accra-Kumasi, characterized by higher population density and greater infrastructure were selected for inclusion in the study. Selected rural communities were Kraboa, Panpanso, Amanfrom, Doblo, and Obom which consist of remote settlements with scattered populations and limited access to basic infrastructure (Figure 1). A total of 1,000 participants were randomly enrolled, with all individuals above two years of age eligible for inclusion irrespective of symptom status. Participant recruitment and sample collection were community-based and conducted through household visits. The cohort included 654 women and 346 men, ranging in age from three to 90 years. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment, with legally authorized representatives providing consent on behalf of minors.

Laboratory analysis

Naso-/oropharyngeal swabs were collected from each participant and placed into a single tube containing viral transport medium, in accordance with standard operating procedures (7). Blood was collected in cell preparation tubes (CPT, Becton Dickinson) with sodium citrate and centrifuged at 1,800× g for 30 min at room temperature. Swab and plasma samples were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C on the same day. Viral RNA was extracted from naso-/oropharyngeal swabs using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer's instructions. One-step RT-qPCR assays were conducted using the LightMix® Modular Kits (TIB MOLBIOL, Berlin, Germany) complemented with Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix for amplification and quantitative detection of HCoV RNA. The LightMix® Modular panCoronavirus Kit was used to target the conserved polyprotein gene for the detection of a wide range of coronaviruses, while species specific LightMix® Modular Kits for SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-NL63 were employed for species confirmation.

Plasma samples were tested using V-PLEX® Coronavirus Panel 3 kits (Meso Scale Discovery, MSD) to quantify immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentrations against the Spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E, following the manufacturer's instructions. IgG antibodies were selected because they are relatively stable and persist longer following infection or vaccination, making them appropriate markers for assessing prior exposure and population-level seroprevalence. In contrast, antibodies such as IgM and IgA are typically associated with early or acute infection and decline more rapidly over time. Since the primary objective of the serological component of this study was to evaluate cumulative exposure to HCoVs within the study population, IgG was considered the most suitable immunological marker. Cutoff values for positive antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein were determined from 400 plasma samples collected before the COVID-19 pandemic in the Ashanti and Central Regions of Ghana as described in our previous study (6). Similar cutoff values could not be determined for the other HCoVs as no samples before circulation of HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E were available.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using R (base packages). HCoV RNA prevalence was calculated as the proportion of pan-coronavirus RT-qPCR-positive samples out of the total number of swabs tested, and species-specific prevalence was calculated among pan-coronavirus-positive samples. Serological data were summarized as median IgG antibody concentrations with interquartile ranges. Differences in antibody concentrations between rural and urban populations were assessed using the two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Results were stratified by community and age group to examine population-level patterns of HCoV exposure. Data visualization was performed using the ggplot2 package in R.

Ethics

Approval for the study was obtained from the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) Institutional Review Board (IRB) with federal wide assurance number 00001824, the Ghana Health Service IRB and the Ethics Committee Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ) with Statement ID AO_2023-00020. All individuals above two years of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. Written informed consent was received from all study participants and in the case of minors from legally authorized representatives (parents or guardians) prior to enrollment.

3. Results

We tested 1,000 naso-/oropharyngeal swabs for the presence of HCoV RNA using a pan-coronavirus RT-qPCR assay. Overall, 6.7% (67/1,000) of samples tested positive, indicating active or very recent coronavirus infection. Among these positives, SARS-CoV-2 was the most frequently detected species (29.9%, 20/67), followed by HCoV-229E (20.9%, 14/67), HCoV-HKU1 (3.0%, 2/67), and HCoV-OC43 (1.5%, 1/67) (Figure 2A). Two participants tested positive for both SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E, indicating co-infection. HCoV-NL63 was not detected. SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E RNA were detected in both rural and urban participants, whereas HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 RNA were found only in urban areas. Notably, 47.8% (32/67) of pan-coronavirus-positive samples could not be typed by species-specific RT-qPCR assays.

To assess prior exposure, plasma samples from 989 participants were tested for IgG antibodies against the full-length Spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-OC43. Antibody responses varied markedly across viruses, with high median concentrations against SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-229E Spike, and lower median concentrations against HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-HKU1 Spike in both rural and urban populations (Figure 2B). Median antibody concentrations against all five endemic viruses—SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-NL63—were consistently higher in urban compared to rural populations (Figure 2B). Cross-reactive antibodies to SARS-CoV-1 Spike and, to a lesser extent, MERS-CoV Spike were also detected, reflecting antigenic similarities within the betacoronavirus genus. Based on the defined cutoff, 98.7% of participants showed evidence of prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Spike through vaccination or infection (6). The same ranking of antibody levels (SARS-CoV-2 > HCoV-OC43 > HCoV-229E > HCoV-HKU1 > HCoV-NL63) was observed across different communities and age groups (Supplementary Figures 1A,B). Anti-229E and anti-HKU1 antibody concentrations increased with age, while anti-OC43 and anti-NL63 levels remained relatively constant across age groups.

4. Discussion

This study provides a contemporary assessment of HCoV circulation in rural and urban Ghana during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. A substantial proportion of participants (6.7%) had detectable HCoV RNA, indicating ongoing or recent infections within the study population. SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E were the predominant circulating coronaviruses, while HCoV-NL63 was not detected. The presence of co-infections highlights the potential for simultaneous circulation of multiple HCoVs in the population and may complicate respiratory disease surveillance due to overlapping clinical presentations. Notably, nearly half of the pan-coronavirus-positive samples could not be typed using species-specific assays, which may reflect infections with uncharacterized coronaviruses or reduced sensitivity of the species-specific RT-qPCR assays compared to the pan-coronavirus assay. This suggests the importance of incorporating sequencing approaches in the region and in future studies to better define circulating viral diversity. Differences in virus detection between rural and urban settings, with higher diversity observed in urban areas, suggest that population density and mobility may influence transmission dynamics and exposure risk.

There are two main seasons in the study areas—the harmattan/dry and wet seasons. Sampling was conducted between November and December during the harmattan, a period characterized by dry and dusty atmospheric conditions that can affect viral survival and transmission dynamics.

A pre-COVID-19 study (2011–2012) in three rural communities in the Brong Ahafo and Ashanti Regions of Ghana reported a similar HCoV distribution among individuals with acute respiratory tract infections during harmattan (5). In that study, overall HCoV detection rates were higher during the harmattan than in the wet season, with HCoV-229E predominating in harmattan and HCoV-NL63 in the wet season, consistent with our post-pandemic finding of high HCoV-229E prevalence and absence of HCoV-NL63 detection during harmattan, while HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 were detected at comparable levels throughout the year.

Seasonal differences suggest that environmental factors, such as humidity and temperatures, which can enhance respiratory virus stability, may influence the prevalence and circulation patterns of specific HCoVs (5). In temperate climates, HCoVs typically show clear seasonal patterns, with most cases occurring in winter (1, 8, 9). Additional investigations are needed to further characterize the seasonality of HCoVs especially in West African countries with tropical climates.

Our serological analysis also demonstrated widespread exposure to HCoVs with particularly high antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-229E. These findings align with pre-COVID-19 pandemic data from the Brong Ahafo and Ashanti Regions in Ghana reporting HCoV-229E as the most seroprevalent virus, followed by HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-NL63 (10). Higher antibody concentrations in urban populations suggest increased exposure, possibly due to greater population density and interaction rates. The age-related increase in antibody levels for HCoV-229E and HCoV-HKU1 suggests cumulative exposure over time, while stable levels for HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-NL63 may indicate early-life exposure and sustained immunity. The detection of cross-reactive antibodies to SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV reflects antigenic relatedness among coronaviruses, particularly within the betacoronavirus genus.

A limitation of this study is the lack of well-characterized seronegative and positive control sera for the endemic HCoVs as well as for MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1, which precluded the determination of virus-specific cutoff values for these assays. Additionally, sampling was restricted to a single season, limiting generalizability across the full annual cycle. Information regarding timing of sample collection relative to symptom onset was also not systematically documented for symptomatic individuals, limiting assessment of associations between viral detection and stage of illness. Future studies should incorporate validated control sera, longitudinal sampling across seasons, and genomic sequencing of pan-coronavirus-positive samples to better define circulating viral diversity, seasonality in tropical West Africa and further refine serological thresholds.

In summary, these findings demonstrate ongoing co-circulation of multiple HCoVs, with SARS-CoV-2 as the predominant strain in both rural and urban Ghana in the post-pandemic era, highlight the influence of environmental and demographic factors on transmission dynamics, and reveal high population-level exposure. These data provide rare epidemiological insight into HCoV circulation in Ghana and offer a baseline level of endemic coronavirus circulation, to guide future surveillance activities.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation [grant number PR00P3_208580 to KR] and the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). The work was supported by Meso Scale Diagnostics, who provided the V-PLEX® Coronavirus Panel 3 kits used in this study.

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics approval

The studies involving humans were approved by Approval for the study was obtained from the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) Institutional Review Board (IRB) with federal wide assurance number 00001824, the Ghana Health Service IRB and the Ethics Committee Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ) with Statement ID AO_2023-00020. All individuals above two years of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. Written informed consent was received from all study participants and in the case of minors from legally authorized representatives (parents or guardians) prior to enrollment. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

EL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. MM-R: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DO: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EO-A: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. FA: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JH: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. BL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Software, Validation, Visualization. KR: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft. IO: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Methodology.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the volunteers for their participation in this study. We also thank Emmanuel Frimpong Gyekye for his assistance with map preparation and Kojo Nketia for his support with R data analysis. We are grateful to all members of the Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Laboratory (iDEL) Group at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) for their contributions and support.

References

  1. 1. Edridge AWD, Kaczorowska J, Hoste ACR, Bakker M, Klein M, Loens K. Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nat Med. (2020) 26: 1691 – 3. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1083-1
  2. 2. Monto AS, DeJonge PM, Callear AP, Bazzi LA, Capriola SB, Malosh RE. Coronavirus occurrence and transmission over 8 years in the HIVE cohort of households in Michigan. J Infect Dis. (2020) 222: 9 – 16. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa161
  3. 3. Chen Z, Tsui JL-H, Gutierrez B, Busch Moreno S, Du Plessis L, Deng X. COVID-19 pandemic interventions reshaped the global dispersal of seasonal influenza viruses. Science (80-). (2024) 386: eadq3003. doi:10.1126/science.adq3003
  4. 4. Otto SP, MacPherson A, Colijn C. Endemic does not mean constant as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve. Evolution. (2024) 78: 1092 – 108. doi:10.1093/evolut/qpae041
  5. 5. Owusu M, Annan A, Corman VM, Larbi R, Anti P, Drexler JF. Human coronaviruses associated with upper respiratory tract infections in three rural areas of Ghana. PLoS One. (2014) 9: e99782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099782
  6. 6. Montiel-Ruiz M, Lomotey ES, Obeng-Aboagye E, Quaye I, Odumang DA, Amakye FB. Immune imprinting and antibody profiles to SARS-CoV-2 in Urban and Rural Ghana. iScience. (2025) 28: 112511. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112511
  7. 7. Coden E, Russo F, Arosio AD, Castelnuovo P, Karligkiotis A, Volpi L. Optimum naso-oropharyngeal swab procedure for COVID-19: step-by-step preparation and technical hints. Laryngoscope. (2020) 130: 2564 – 7. doi:10.1002/lary.29010
  8. 8. Killerby ME, Biggs HM, Haynes A, Dahl RM, Mustaquim D, Gerber SI. Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014–2017. J Clin Virol. (2018) 101: 52 – 6. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2018.01.019
  9. 9. Shah MM, Winn A, Dahl RM, Kniss KL, Silk BJ, Killerby ME. Seasonality of common human coronaviruses, United States, 2014–2021. Emerg Infect Dis. (2022) 28: 1970 – 6. doi:10.3201/eid2810.220396
  10. 10. Owusu M, Sylverken AA, El-Duah P, Acheampong G, Mutocheluh M, Adu-Sarkodie Y. Sero-epidemiology of human coronaviruses in three rural communities in Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. (2021) 38: 244. doi:10.11604/pamj.2021.38.244.26110

Citation

Lomotey, E. S., et al. (2026). High prevalence of human coronaviruses in rural and urban Ghana in the post-COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Epidemiology, Volume 6. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
6 - 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Lomotey, Montiel-Ruiz, Odumang, Obeng-Aboagye, Amakye, Hayford, Logonia, Röltgen and Owusu Donkor.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Irene Owusu Donkor

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0