Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Epidemiology ·

Volume 6 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2026.1916966

A survey of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis among adults residing in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study examining associated factors

  • Riya Inder Sevhani1
  • Vivek Vasudevan2
  • Diya Harish Vanjani1
  • Prasanna AP3
  • Aashna Anuraag Mewada1
  • Dhyan Ashish Shah1
  • Kashish Doulatram Mohandas Devnani1
  • Shahnaz Mohammad Wazil1
  • Anusha Sreejith4,5*corresponding author
  1. 1College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  2. 2College of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  3. 3Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  4. 4Department of Community Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  5. 5Thumbay Institute of Population Health, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Varicose veins are a common manifestation of chronic venous diseases. Despite their clinical and occupational relevance, epidemiological data from the United Arab Emirates remains limited. This study estimated the prevalence of self-reported clinically-diagnosed varicose veins and examined the associated factors among adults residing in the UAE. A cross-sectional survey was conducted across all seven emirates of the UAE between June 2025 and April 2026. A total of 1,043 eligible participants residing in the UAE were recruited through non-probability convenience sampling technique, and findings should be interpreted as preliminary and non-generalizable. The prevalence of varicose veins was estimated based on self-reported prior clinical diagnosis. Data was analyzed using SPSS (v29), associations with demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors were assessed using Pearson's chi-square tests and logistic regression models. Among surveyed adults in the UAE, 15.05% self-reported a prior clinical diagnosis of varicose veins; this figure reflects the study sample only and should not be interpreted as a population-representative prevalence. Most participants correctly identified varicose veins. Advancing age, body mass index, prolonged standing, and positive family history of the disease were significantly associated with higher odds (p <.001). These findings provide preliminary, non-generalizable evidence on self-reported previously diagnosed varicose veins among the surveyed convenience sample of adults in the UAE. The condition represents a notable concern within the study population, and the results are hypothesis-generating, emphasizing the need for targeted early diagnosis among high-risk individuals, while also highlighting the need for clinically validated, probability-based population studies in the UAE.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Varicose veins are visible, enlarged, twisted, and painful superficial veins that commonly affect the lower limbs, arising due to venous valve insufficiency and weak vein walls, causing blood to pool and vessel walls to distend abnormally (1). They reflect underlying chronic venous diseases, which are conditions arising due to impaired venous return in lower extremities, and are associated with significant morbidity, diminishing overall quality of life (2). The pathophysiology of varicose veins is complex and involves mechanisms that causes venous blood reflux and stasis, leading to progressive structural changes in the vein wall (3–5). The condition follows a chronic course and may lead to complications like venous ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic venous insufficiency if left untreated (6, 7). However, varicose veins are commonly perceived as a cosmetic concern, and early clinical symptoms like leg pain, heaviness, skin discoloration, itching, and muscle cramps are often normalized (8, 9).

Varicose veins affect approximately one-third of adults globally, with estimates suggesting that global prevalence lies between 10% and 30%, though some populations report even higher rates depending on their methodology and study criteria (10). This represents a significant public health burden. Epidemiological literature has shown that biological factors like genetic predisposition, advancing age, and female sex increase the risk and progression of the disease (11). Women are at a higher risk of developing varicose veins as compared to men, although high prevalence rates have been reported among men as well (12, 13). Lifestyle and occupational exposures, particularly involving prolonged standing, physical inactivity, and obesity are modifiable risk factors that are consistently associated with a higher prevalence of the condition (14, 15).

In the Middle Eastern region, several characteristics make resident populations more vulnerable to venous diseases. Multiple studies conducted in Saudi Arabia have reported epidemiological data on the prevalence and risk factors of varicose veins, suggesting prolonged standing and body mass index (BMI) are significant predictors (2, 3, 8). The diverse population in the UAE, predominantly composed of expatriates who engage in either physically demanding occupations or sedentary lifestyles, remains largely unexplored in the context of varicose veins (6, 11). Furthermore, extreme environmental temperatures and rising obesity rates in the UAE may exacerbate venous dysfunction through peripheral vasodilation and venous stasis (14). These regional characteristics underscore the importance for dedicated epidemiological studies in the Middle Eastern region, particularly in the United Arab Emirates.

Despite this relevance, no community-based epidemiological study has yet reported the prevalence of varicose veins in the UAE. Existing evidence is largely confined to small hospital-based studies within neighboring countries, limiting the generalizability of their findings to the UAE's distinct demographic and environmental context. Due to these reasons, public health interventions addressing preventive strategies and targeting vulnerable populations are limited. These cumulative gaps highlight the significance of conducting this research. Therefore, the present study aims primarily to estimate the self-reported prevalence of varicose veins based on prior medical diagnosis among adults residing in the UAE and, secondarily, to identify the associated demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design, setting, and sampling

A cross-sectional study design was chosen, and the study was conducted across all seven emirates of the United Arab Emirates from June 2025 till April 2026. The sample size was calculated using the formula for single proportion estimation, based on an expected prevalence of 0.33 as reported by Antani MR et al. (16), with 10% relative precision, yielding a minimum required sample size of 1,012 participants. A further adjustment of a potential non-response rate of 10% was then applied, a standard adjustment for online/community-based surveys where incomplete or ineligible responses are common, yielding a target sample size of 1,120 participants. Recruitment was continued until this target was approached; however, responses that did not meet the predetermined eligibility criteria were excluded, resulting in a final eligible sample of 1,043 participants. This achieved sample size closely approximates the originally calculated target and is considered adequate to support the primary self-reported prevalence estimate.

2.2 Participant recruitment and eligibility criteria

A non-probability convenience sampling technique was used due to its practicality and feasibility for rapid data collection. Participants were recruited through online dissemination of the survey via multiple online platforms and social media channels, including WhatsApp, Instagram, community health groups, and university networks, and multiple community settings, including public leisure venues (shopping malls and cafes), were approached to enhance diversity. This approach aimed to improve the heterogeneity of the study sample. All seven emirates were represented in the final sample size, maximizing geographic coverage. Participant selection and inclusion criteria have been illustrated in Figure 1.

STROBE flow diagram of participant selection and inclusion.
Figure 1. STROBE flow diagram of participant selection and inclusion.

2.3 Variables assessed and measurements

Data was collected using a newly developed self-administered questionnaire via Google Forms. Three experts of vascular surgery and community medicine reviewed the questionnaire to ensure content validity and necessary modifications were made following their feedback. While the questionnaire underwent content validation by subject-matter experts, no formal psychometric validation was performed; this is acknowledged as a study limitation. A pilot study was conducted among 10 individuals to evaluate clarity and feasibility. All participants were shown standardized clinical images of varicose veins in lower limbs, which were reviewed and validated by experts to confirm accuracy and appropriate clinical representation.

The prevalence of varicose veins was estimated through self-reported prior clinical diagnosis of varicose veins. Sociodemographic (age, gender, BMI, residing emirate, nationality, education level, and employment status), lifestyle (exercise, smoking, alcohol, caffeine consumption, hydration, and average time spent standing and sitting per day) and medical factors (history of chronic conditions, micronutrient deficiencies, constipation, and family history of varicose veins) were self-reported by all participants. Visual awareness was operationally based on correct identification of the standardized clinical image representing varicose veins, and responses were categorized accordingly.

Lifestyle variables were operationally defined as follows: Exercise was categorized as regular engagement in structured physical activity of at least 150 min per week (yes/no); smoking and alcohol consumption were each categorized as current use (yes/no); caffeine consumption was categorized as low/none (≤100 mg/day) versus moderate-to-high (100–400 mg/day or more), estimated from self-reported number and type of caffeinated beverages consumed daily; hydration status was categorized by self-reported average daily water intake into three bands (less than 2 liters, 2–3 liters, and 3 liters or more); and average daily time spent standing and sitting were each self-reported using four categorical bands (less than 2 h, 2–4 h, 4–6 h, and more than 6 h).

2.4 Statistical methods

The dataset was analyzed using SPSS software version 29. Sociodemographic characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Associations between categorical variables and prevalence were assessed by Pearson's chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Significant variables were further included in bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (CORs and AORs) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

2.5 Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Gulf Medical University (Ref. no. IRB-COM-STD-182-June-2025). Informed consent was obtained, and participant anonymity and confidentiality were ensured. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

3 Results

3.1 Sociodemographic characteristics

The study included 1,043 participants from the UAE, as summarized in Table 1. Most of the participants (45.3%) were aged between 30 and 45 years, while females were slightly more than half (53.5%). A normal body mass index (BMI) was observed in 43% of participants. Among the diverse nationalities in the UAE, there was a predominance of the Southeast Asia region (68.5%).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics (N = 1,043).

VariableGroupFrequencyPercent (%)
Ageless than 30 years28927.7
between 30 and 45 years47345.3
above 45 years28127
GenderMale48546.5
Female55853.5
BMINormal weight44843
Overweight44242.3
Obese15314.7
Emirate of residenceAbu Dhabi666.3
Dubai51349.2
Sharjah25524.4
Ajman16916.2
Umm Al Quwain121.2
Ras Al Khaimah171.6
Fujairah111.1
NationalityEMR – Eastern Mediterranean Region17616.9
SEAR – South-East Asia Region71468.5
WPR - Western Pacific Region878.3
Others666.3
Education levelPrimary school373.5
Secondary/high school22121.2
Bachelor's55052.7
Master's21020.1
PHD252.4
Employment statusNo25924.8
Yes78475.2

This table presents the descriptive statistics of the sociodemographic variables of the study population. BMI, Body Mass Index; Others = African Region (Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, Sudan); European Region (UK, Germany, France); and Region of the Americas (USA, Canada, Brazil).

3.2 Self-reported prevalence of varicose veins

The prevalence of self-reported varicose veins among surveyed adults in the United Arab Emirates was determined to be 15.05%. As illustrated in Figure 2, out of 1,043 participants, 157 had a prior medical diagnosis of varicose veins.

Prevalence of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis among adults residing in the UAE (*N* = 1,043).
Figure 2. Prevalence of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis among adults residing in the UAE (N = 1,043).

3.3 Visual awareness of varicose veins

Visual awareness was assessed using standardized clinical images, and 72.5% of individuals correctly identified varicose veins (Figure 3).

Visual awareness of varicose veins among study participants (*N* = 1,043).
Figure 3. Visual awareness of varicose veins among study participants (N = 1,043).

3.4 Bivariate logistic regression analyses showing the association of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and medical factors with the prevalence of varicose veins

Pearson's chi-square tests are provided in the supplementary material. Supplementary Table S1 shows the significant associations between sociodemographic characteristics like age, gender, nationality, and BMI with the prevalence of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis (p < .001). these associations were included in logistic regression analysis, as reported in Table 2, individuals aged between 30 and 45 years (OR=4.28, 95% CI: 2.28–8.03) and those above 45 years (OR=7.8, 95% CI: 4.12–14.76) had comparatively higher odds of developing the condition. Additionally, obese individuals also showed a similar association (OR=5.55, 95% CI: 3.43–8.97).

Table 2. Logistic regression analysis of significant sociodemographic variables (N = 1,043).

SociodemographicvariablesCrude Odds Ratio (OR)ConfidenceInterval (CI) (95%)p-value
LowerUpper
Ageless than 30 years1
between 30 and 45 years4.2812.2838.030<.001
above 45 years7.8044.12614.764<.001
GenderMale1
Female1.5881.1192.253.010
NationalityOthers1
EMR – Eastern Mediterranean Region1.383.7242.644.326
SEAR—South-East Asia Region.383.208.705.002
WPR - Western Pacific Region.361.148.878.025
BMINormal weight1
Overweight2.1901.4323.350<.001
Obese5.5563.4398.976<.001

BMI, Body Mass Index. Bivariate logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictors among sociodemographic factors associated with the prevalence of varicose veins. The reference category was assigned an OR of 1. A 95% confidence interval excluding 1 was considered indicative of statistical significance. p-values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Lifestyle factors like exercise, hydration habits, average time spent standing and medical factors like chronic diseases, nutrient deficiencies, and family history of varicose veins (p < .001) were significantly associated (Supplementary Table S2–S3) and further included in the logistic regression analysis. In Table 3, participants who had inadequate hydration (less than 2 liters) had higher odds (OR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.68–3.53). Prolonged standing (more than 6 h) also posed a significant risk (OR=3.64, 95% CI: 2.21–6.0). Multiple chronic diseases and low magnesium levels were significant as well. Genetic predisposition with a positive family history of varicose veins exhibited substantially higher odds (OR=14.16, 95% CI: 8.93–22.45).

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of significant lifestyle and medical variables (N = 1,043).

Lifestyle FactorsCrude Odds Ratio (OR)ConfidenceInterval (CI) (95%)p-value
LowerUpper
ExerciseYes1
No1.7481.2242.496.002
Hydration statusMore than or 3 liters1
Less than 2 liters2.4441.6883.539<.001
Caffeine consumptionLow or No (</=100 mg)1
Moderate to high (100 mg to 400 mg or more)2.0391.3773.019<.001
Hours spent sitting dailyMore than 6 h1
Less than 2 h2.1311.1953.801.010
2–4 h1.496.9542.347.080
4–6 h.763.4801.211.251
Hours spent standing dailyLess than 2 h1
2–4 h.542.2931.002.051
4–6 h1.235.7192.123.444
More than 6 h3.6482.2176.003<.001
Medical Factors
DiabetesNo1
Yes3.1412.0844.734<.001
HypertensionNo1
Yes2.9972.0814.316<.001
High cholesterolNo1
Yes2.3271.5843.417<.001
ArthritisNo1
Yes4.9772.8338.742<.001
Hormonal diseases (Thyroid, PCOS)No1
Yes2.5371.6513.899<.001
Low MagnesiumNo1
Yes3.4182.1575.417<.001
ConstipationNo1
Yes2.6991.8873.861<.001
Family history of varicose veinsNo1
yes14.1608.93222.450<.001
I do not know2.1331.2033.779.009

PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome. Bivariate logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictors among lifestyle and medical factors associated with the prevalence of varicose veins. The reference category was assigned an OR of 1; a 95% confidence interval excluding 1 was considered indicative of statistical significance. p-values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

3.5 Multivariate logistic regression of significant sociodemographic, lifestyle, and medical factors with prevalence of varicose veins

As reported in Table 4, sociodemographic characteristics like age and BMI retained their statistical significance. Participants aged above 45 years had progressively higher odds of developing varicose veins (AOR=5.81, 95% CI: 2.56–13.18). Additionally, obese individuals were at higher risk. Standing for more than 6 h daily and a positive family history contributed to significantly higher odds as well.

Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (N = 1,043).

Sociodemographic factorsAORsConfidenceInterval (CI) (95%)p-value
LowerUpper
Ageless than 30 years1
between 30 and 45 years2.4811.1865.190.016
above 45 years5.8142.56413.183<.001
GenderMale1
Female1.212.7052.086.487
NationalityOthers1
EMR – Eastern Mediterranean Region5.3361.95814.540.001
SEAR—South-East Asia Region.784.3171.937.598
WPR - Western Pacific Region.965.2753.387.955
BMINormal weight1
Overweight1.7961.0263.145.040
Obese3.3881.6916.788<.001
Lifestyle factors
ExerciseNo1
Yes1.129.6561.944.661
HydrationMore than or 3 liters
Less than 2 liters1.9011.1513.138.012
Caffeine consumptionLow or No (</=100 mg)1
Moderate to high (100 mg to 400 mg or more)1.8541.0863.166.024
Hours spent sitting dailyMore than 6 h1
4–6 h.798.3981.603.526
2–4 h1.117.5242.381.775
Less than 2 h2.304.8935.948.084
Hours spent standing dailyLess than 2 h1
2–4 h1.129.4922.593.774
4–6 h2.9211.3116.508.009
More than 6 h6.6232.84115.441<.001
Medical factors
DiabetesNo
Yes2.2261.1514.305.017
HypertensionNo
Yes1.411.7772.563.258
High cholesterolNo
Yes.572.2971.101.094
ArthritisNo
Yes1.426.6113.328.411
Hormonal diseases (Thyroid, PCOS)No
Yes1.638.8583.128.135
Low MagnesiumNo
Yes3.4131.7166.788<.001
ConstipationNo
Yes1.218.7122.084.472
Family history of varicose veinsNo
yes16.2909.02329.409<.001
I do not know2.2741.1794.389.014

BMI, Body Mass Index; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome;.

Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors among the significant sociodemographic, lifestyle, and medical factors associated with the prevalence of varicose veins. The reference category was assigned an AOR of 1; a 95% confidence interval excluding 1 was considered indicative of statistical significance. p-values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

4 Discussion

4.1 Prevalence and awareness

This study provides preliminary evidence on self-reported clinically-diagnosed varicose veins among a convenience sample of adults residing in the United Arab Emirates. The observed prevalence estimate of 15.05% falls within the lower range of internationally reported prevalence figures (17) and is comparable to various regional studies in the Middle East (18–20). However, an explicit comparison was not possible due to the absence of epidemiological data in the UAE. This study addresses a critical gap in literature and presents essential insights from within the country; however, as our outcome was based on self-reported clinical diagnosis collected via non-probability sampling, the findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence rather than a population prevalence estimate.

The observed awareness was 72.5%, suggesting a substantial proportion of participants were able to visually identify the condition. A notable strength of our study is assessing awareness by utilizing standardized images. Recent studies have proven that visual and image-based health communication significantly enhances disease recognition, specifically in visually identifiable diseases like varicose veins (21, 22). However, this reflects general awareness rather than clinical understanding of the disease and does not ensure that affected individuals will seek medical evaluation if needed. This awareness-to-action gap may reflect structural barriers affecting the UAE's expatriate majority, including healthcare costs, occupational time constraints, and concerns regarding medical consultations, consistent with broader population health frameworks emphasizing the role of social capital, trust, and healthcare system responsiveness in shaping health-seeking behavior and disease detection across diverse populations (23).

4.2 Sociodemographic significance

Our results state that advanced age, greater than 45 years, increases the odds of disease development by 5 times. This association can be clinically explained by age-dependent vascular changes like progressive loss of endothelial cells, inflammation, and scarring of the weakened venous wall, which manifest as tortuous and dilated visible veins. Advancing age is also linked to thickening and stiffening of venous valves, leading to reflux and blood stasis in veins (24). However, older adults also have longer exposure time to diagnosis, which may partly inflate the observed association. Our findings are consistent with recent cross-sectional studies in Saudi Arabia and Egypt that concluded a significant age-related increase in incidence of the disease (19, 25). Our observations aligned with a German study conducted across a diverse population as well (26). For contrast in perspective, our findings were not consistent with a study in Saudi Arabia conducted among surgeons (27); however, these differences can be attributed to different occupational settings. Participants from the EMR nationality showed higher odds, although the underlying biological mechanism remains unclear, this association suggests EMR nationals may be more likely to receive clinical diagnoses relative to other nationalities, reflecting different healthcare utilization and awareness patterns across the study population (28).

BMI was significantly associated with varicose veins; obese individuals had nearly 3 times higher odds of acquiring the condition. These findings align with established pathological pathways linking adipose tissue deposition to chronic venous disease by elevating intra-abdominal pressure and venous pressure in lower limbs, causing symptoms of varicose veins. Furthermore, increasing BMI has a significant correlation with disease progression (29, 30). This is particularly relevant to the UAE, where nearly 58% of adults are overweight or obese, representing a substantial at-risk population (31). This association is consistent with regional evidence. A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia found that obesity was reported by 71% of those diagnosed with varicose veins (32). While differences in population demographics and methodology limit direct comparability of their estimates to the UAE setting, the consistent identification of obesity as a significant predictor reinforces the importance of weight management as part of venous disease prevention strategies.

4.3 Lifestyle and medical associations

Prolonged standing (more than 6 h daily) increased the risk by nearly 7 times (AOR=6.62). Biological mechanisms suggest that prolonged standing elevates venous hydrostatic pressure in the lower limbs, resulting in stress on the venous valves. Over time, this may contribute to valvular incompetence, venous reflux, and blood stasis (34, 35). A cross-sectional study in Iraq reported similar findings (36). Furthermore, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the global epidemiology of varicose veins have consistently identified prolonged standing as an important modifiable risk factor (37–39). However, in contrast to our results, a cross-sectional study conducted by Soeder J et al. did not observe a statistically significant association between objectively measured occupational standing and varicose veins, although continuous prolonged standing was significantly associated with pathological venous reflux, suggesting that continuous standing without heterogeneous movement may lead to venous insufficiency. Notably, the authors acknowledged limitations like smaller sample size and occupational heterogeneity (40). These findings highlight the complex association between prolonged standing and venous disease and supports occupational-health interventions, including movement breaks, ergonomic redesign, and education among workers, the effectiveness of which depends substantially on healthcare system factors, including organizational commitment to worker health, availability of preventive services, and the extent to which providers are empowered to deliver occupational health guidance (41).

Low hydration status (less than 2 liters of water per day) was associated with higher odds. This finding is consistent with a regional case-control study conducted in Egypt, which reported similar findings (14). Given the UAE's hot climate and increased risk of dehydration, adequate hydration may represent a potentially modifiable factor that can be included in lifestyle-based prevention strategies for venous disorders (33). However, this association should be interpreted with caution, as water intake was self-reported and may not accurately represent physiological hydration status; the finding is therefore exploratory and hypothesis-generating, and further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms linking hydration status with the condition. Lower magnesium levels were similarly associated, although they were self-reported; this finding is linked with the condition's coherent biological basis, as it exacerbates inflammation and destabilizes the extracellular matrix, resulting in vulnerability to venous wall injury. A clinical study directly examining this association found that low serum magnesium levels may pose a potential risk for the development of chronic venous insufficiency (42). However, this finding underscores the need for further evaluation through biomedical validation. The lack of independent associations for hypertension, high cholesterol, arthritis, hormonal disease, and constipation suggests that these factors may not be strong predictors of the disease and are influenced by confounding from demographic, lifestyle, or medical variables, resulting in attenuation of their effects after adjustment.

A positive family history was the most robust independent predictor (AOR=16.29). The genetic aspects of this disease have only been recently explored. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in chronic venous diseases have identified multiple susceptibility loci and genes with plausible biological significance in extracellular matrix regeneration, immune signaling, vascular development, and smooth muscle function. These genetic associations strongly support the widely observed trend of hereditary factors related to the development of varicose veins (43, 44). Several regional and global studies support these findings. In three cross-sectional studies carried out among surgeons, healthcare providers, and teachers of both sexes across Saudi Arabia and Jordan, a positive family history was reported as a significant risk factor for developing varicose veins (39, 45, 46). Furthermore, global systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consistently highlighted similar findings, emphasizing the epidemiological significance of genetic predisposition on the disease pathology and highlighting the importance of familial risk stratification in clinical and public health settings. However, family history was self-reported and may also reflect greater awareness and diagnostic vigilance within affected families.

4.4 Limitations

This study has limitations that should be considered while interpreting its findings. A cross-sectional design precludes establishing causal relationships between identified factors and the self-reported clinically diagnosed varicose veins. Further studies with suitable methodology and clinical validation are required to investigate this association. The use of non-probability sampling may have introduced a potential selection bias, limiting the generalizability of the findings to the wider UAE population. Certain demographics may have been over or underrepresented, potentially influencing the prevalence estimates. In particular, South-East Asian nationals comprised 68.5% of the study sample, which exceeds government-reported estimates of South Asian representation in the UAE population (approximately 50%–60%), while participants from the Eastern Mediterranean and Western Pacific regions were comparatively underrepresented relative to their estimated share of the population. This distribution reflects the inherent limitations of non-probability convenience sampling and further restricts the generalizability of these findings to the broader UAE population. However, to mitigate this, the survey was distributed across diverse communities and public settings. Additionally, while the achieved sample size closely approximated the calculated target, the study was not specifically powered for subgroup analyses, and such stratified findings should be interpreted as exploratory rather than confirmatory. The self-administered questionnaire, although reviewed for content validity by three experts, did not undergo formal psychometric validation, which may have affected measurement precision.

The study outcome was based on self-reported prior clinically diagnosed varicose veins instead of clinical examination or Doppler ultrasound confirmation, potentially resulting in misclassification bias. Clinically standardized images of varicose veins were used to improve the accuracy of self-reported cases and awareness among the population. However, it does not replace clinical examination and diagnosis. This approach was utilized to provide objective and performance-based awareness, minimizing recall bias and subjective interpretation. Furthermore, self-reported data on lifestyle and medical factors assessed among the study population may introduce a recall bias.

4.5 Conclusion

The prevalence of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis among this convenience sample of adult residents in the United Arab Emirates was 15.05%; as a non-probability sample, this estimate should not be interpreted as representative of the general UAE population. Nonmodifiable factors, including advancing age, and genetic predisposition, alongside modifiable factors like obesity, prolonged standing, and self-reported low hydration and magnesium levels, were significantly associated with higher odds after adjustment. These findings are hypothesis generating and support the need for targeted public health interventions to address venous health and reinforce the clinical importance of varicose veins as a treatable condition, not just a cosmetic concern. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first preliminary sample-based prevalence estimate of self-reported varicose veins with prior medical diagnosis among the residing population in the UAE. However, due to the non-probability sampling and self-reported diagnostic, lifestyle, and medical data, the findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and should be followed by clinically validated population-based studies.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fepid.2026.1916966/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Saeed Amini, Khomein University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Reviewed by: Nasrin Roozbahani, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Zohreh Anbari, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics approval

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Review Board Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

RS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VV: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to all study participants for their valuable time and contribution to this research. We also acknowledge the support and guidance provided by the Department of Community Medicine, Gulf Medical University, throughout the study.

References

  1. 1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Cancer.gov. Available online at: (Accessed June 17, 2026).
  2. 2. Al Wahbi A, Dohaim A, Shalaan A, Malki A, Jadeed A. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic venous disease among females in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. World J Surg Surgical Res. (2021) 4: 1278.. Available online at: doi:10.25107/2637-4625.1278
  3. 3. Alghamdi D, Al-Shehri R, Al-Qahtani MF, Mehmood UA. The effect of varicose veins on the quality of life of adult female patients in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Open Public Health J. (2020) 13: 771 – 8. doi:10.2174/1874944502013010771
  4. 4. Gwozdzinski L, Pieniazek A, Gwozdzinski K. Factors influencing venous remodeling in the development of varicose veins of the lower limbs. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25 (3): 1560. doi:10.3390/ijms25031560
  5. 5. Ortega MA, Fraile-Martínez O, García-Montero C, Álvarez-Mon MA, Chaowen C, Ruiz-Grande F. Understanding chronic venous disease: a critical overview of its pathophysiology and medical management. J Clin Med. (2021) 10 (15): 3239. doi:10.3390/jcm10153239
  6. 6. Avcı Işık S, Budak Ertürk E, Akay HT, Karahan A, Akpınar D, Karslıoğlu A O. Analysis of venous insufficiency risk factors and demographic characteristics among nurses: an analytical cross-sectional study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60 (9): 1498. doi:10.3390/medicina60091498
  7. 7. Nicolaides AN, Labropoulos N. Burden and suffering in chronic venous disease. Adv Ther. (2019) 36 (Suppl 1): 1 – 4. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-0882-6
  8. 8. Baghdadi LR, Alshalan GF, Alyahya NI, Ramadan HH, Alshahrani AM, Alqahtani JA. Prevalence of varicose veins and its risk factors among nurses working at king khalid university hospital Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare (Basel). (2023) 11 (24): 3183. doi:10.3390/healthcare11243183
  9. 9. Santiago F. Quality of life in chronic venous disease: bridging the gap between patients and physicians. Clin Drug Investig. (2023) 43 (Suppl 1): 3 – 8. doi:10.1007/s40261-023-01264-9
  10. 10. Naveen Kumar V, Chitra V, Tamilanban T. Molecular and genetic insights into varicose veins. Gene Rep. (2025) 40: 102260. doi:10.1016/j.genrep.2025.102260
  11. 11. Lumley E, Phillips P, Aber A, Buckley-Woods H, Jones GL, Michaels JA. Experiences of living with varicose veins: a systematic review of qualitative research. J Clin Nurs. (2019) 28 (7-8): 1085 – 99. doi:10.1111/jocn.14720
  12. 12. Mok Y, Ballew SH, Kucharska-Newton A, Butler K, Henke P, Lutsey PL. Demographic and clinical risk factors of developing clinically recognized varicose veins in older adults. Am J Prev Med. (2025) 68 (4): 674 – 81. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.12.009
  13. 13. Gohel MS Varicose veins. Surgery (Oxford). 2025; 43 (5): 277 – 85. doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2025.03.010
  14. 14. Elamrawy S, Darwish I, Moustafa S, Elshaer N, Ahmed N. Epidemiological, life style, and occupational factors associated with lower limb varicose veins: a case control study. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. (2021) 96 (1): 19. doi:10.1186/s42506-021-00075-0
  15. 15. Mao Y, Chen G, Zhou S. Global research trends and clinical trial progress in varicose vein treatment: a decade of advancements (2014−2024). Medicine (Baltimore). (2026) 105 (6): e47592. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000047592
  16. 16. Antani MR, Dattilo JB. Varicose Veins. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2020).
  17. 17. Aslam MR, Muhammad Asif H, Ahmad K, Jabbar S, Hayee A, Sagheer MS. Global impact and contributing factors in varicose vein disease development. SAGE Open Med. (2022) 10: 205031212211189. doi:10.1177/20503121221118992
  18. 18. Salawati E, Alghamdi N, Eissa G, Almaghrabi S. Prevalence and awareness of varicose veins in Saudi Arabia, A cross-sectional study. Bahrain Med Bull. (2024) 46 (2).
  19. 19. Ali SA, Najmi WK, Hakami FM, Almubarak AA, Alhassan RA, Maafa SH. Prevalence of varicose veins among nurses in different departments in Jazan Public Hospitals, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. (2022) 14 (4): e24462. doi:10.7759/cureus.24462
  20. 20. Alavi N, Alimohammadi D, Mianehsaz E. Prevalence and severity of lower-limb varicose and its related factors in nurses working in Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan, Iran, 2020. Nursing and Midwifery Stud. (2022) 11 (3): 209 – 14. doi:10.4103/nms.nms_115_21
  21. 21. Galmarini E, Marciano L, Schulz PJ. The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Services Res. (2024) 24: 718. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11138-1
  22. 22. Schubbe D, Scalia P, Yen RW, Saunders CH, Cohen S, Elwyn G. Using pictures to convey health information: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. (2020) 103 (10): 1935 – 60. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.010
  23. 23. Dehnavieh R, Amini S. Social capital and its effects on health: implications for policy makers. Iran J Public Health. (2015) 44 (11): 1566.
  24. 24. Molnár AÁ, Nádasy GL, Dörnyei G, Patai BB, Delfavero J, Fülöp GÁ. The aging venous system: from varicosities to vascular cognitive impairment. GeroScience. (2021) 43 (6): 2761 – 84. doi:10.1007/s11357-021-00475-2
  25. 25. Elawady M, Albitar EA, Salama AA. Varicose veins and associated risk factors among women in the childbearing period in Benha City, Egypt: a cross-sectional study. Egypt J Hosp Med. (2022) 89 (1): 4205 – 510. doi:10.21608/ejhm.2022.256324
  26. 26. Kraus A-L, Rabe E, Kowall B, Schuldt K, Bock E, Stang A. Differences in risk profile associated with varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency—results from the Bonn Vein Study 1. VASA. (2024) 53 (2): 145 – 54. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a001115
  27. 27. Almutiri BM, Alshammari AM, Alharbi SB, Alamri M, Alsuhaibani AN, Alenazi RS. Evaluating the prevalence and risk factors of varicose veins in surgeons and operating room staff at Buraidah Center Hospital. Cureus. (2024) 16 (1): e51706. doi:10.7759/cureus.51706
  28. 28. Kronfol NM. Access and barriers to health care delivery in Arab countries: a review. East Mediterr Health J. (2012) 18 (12): 1239 – 46. doi:10.26719/2012.18.12.1239
  29. 29. Badak É, A. Janka E, Ari P, Bodnár E, Varga K, Virág L. Risk factors and clinical severity in chronic venous disease: a new look. Int J Dermatol. (2026). doi:10.1111/ijd.70428
  30. 30. Deol ZK, Lakhanpal S, Franzon G, Pappas PJ. Effect of obesity on chronic venous insufficiency treatment outcomes. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. (2020) 8 (4): 617 – 628.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.04.006
  31. 31. Mamdouh H, Hussain HY, Ibrahim GM, Alawadi F, Hassanein M, Zarooni AA. Prevalence and associated risk factors of overweight and obesity among adult population in Dubai: a population-based cross-sectional survey in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates. BMJ Open. (2023) 13 (1): e062053. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062053
  32. 32. Elkholi SM, Alotaibi D, Alrashdi R, Bin Subeh R, Aljudeie H, Aljabr R. Prevalence of varicose veins among teaching professionals and their impact on quality of life and job performance: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare. (2025) 13 (23): 3041. doi:10.3390/healthcare13233041
  33. 33. Altelly A, Lootah A, Daher B, Alsabbagh G, Alsabbagh R, Zaid M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards dehydration among adults in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. (2025) 17 (2): e79240. doi:10.7759/cureus.79240
  34. 34. Salem AM, Massadeh AB, Alfarajat L, Masa'deh R. The predictors of lower limbs varicose veins among healthcare providers. J Educ Health Promot. (2024) 13: 331. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_24
  35. 35. Saberianpour S, Modaghegh MHS, Rahimi H, Kamyar MM. Role of mechanosignaling on pathology of varicose vein. Biophys Rev. (2021) 13 (1): 139 – 45. doi:10.1007/s12551-021-00783-z
  36. 36. Al-Alreda JJA, Majeed HM, Hassan AF. Prevalence and contributed factors for varicose veins in intensive care unit nurses at Baghdad teaching hospitals. Azerbaijan Pharm Pharmacother J. (2023) 22 (2): 33 – 6. doi:10.61336/appj/22-2-10
  37. 37. Weber MJ, Taragin MI. Varicose veins as model for apportionment among risk factors for compensation purposes. J Insur Med. (2024) 51 (3): 129 – 37. doi:10.17849/insm-51-3-1-9.2
  38. 38. He QF, Cai JY, Cheng M, Feng SJ, Lu QY, Wang F. Global prevalence and risk factors of varicose veins among health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. (2025) 24 (1): 550. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03155-0
  39. 39. Salim S, Machin M, Patterson BO, Onida S, Davies AH. Global epidemiology of chronic venous disease: a systematic review with pooled prevalence analysis. Ann Surg. (2021) 274 (6): 971 – 6. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004631
  40. 40. Soeder J, Volk C, Ulmer L, Wagenblast F, Seibt R, Mendoza E. Accelerometer-based assessment of occupational standing time and its association with venous disorders – results of a cross-sectional field study. Sci Rep. (2026) 16: 7477. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38327-8
  41. 41. Amini S, Rahati M, Atash-Parvar S, Panahi M, Shahpari M. Implicit leadership theories and traits: a qualitative study of managers in a medical sciences university. J Healthc Leadersh. (2025) 17: 549 – 63. doi:10.2147/JHL.S544837
  42. 42. Caliskan S, Atay M, Gunay-Polatkan S, Sigirli D. The relationship between venous insufficiency and serum magnesium level. Magnes Res. (2022) 35 (4): 108 – 17. doi:10.1684/mrh.2023.0508
  43. 43. Chen T, Liu P, Zhang C, Jin S, Kong Y, Feng Y. Pathophysiology and genetic associations of varicose veins: a narrative review. Angiology. (2025) 76 (7): 615 – 28. doi:10.1177/00033197241227598
  44. 44. Ahmed W-U-R, Kleeman S, Ng M, Wang W, Auton A, Agee M. Genome-wide association analysis and replication in 810,625 individuals with varicose veins. Nat Commun. (2022) 13 (1): 3065. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30765-y
  45. 45. Qari TA, Almatrafi KN, Khateb FR, Al-Kaabi B, Al-Harbi A, Alabdali S. Prevalence of varicose veins among surgeons: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. (2024) 16 (8): e67687. doi:10.7759/cureus.67687
  46. 46. Busbaih Z, Almohammed Saleh AA, Alsulaiman AH, Almuhanna MA, Alkhawajah SH, Alsuwayie SB. Risk assessment of varicose veins among teachers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. (2022) 14 (6): e26125. doi:10.7759/cureus.26125

Citation

Sevhani, R. I., et al. (2026). A survey of self-reported varicose veins with prior clinical diagnosis among adults residing in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study examining associated factors. Frontiers in Epidemiology, Volume 6. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
6 - 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Sevhani, Vasudevan, Vanjani, AP, Mewada, Shah, Devnani, Wazil and Sreejith.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Anusha Sreejith

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0