Original Research
Frontiers in Fungal Biology ·
Volume 7 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2026.1810614
The impact of environmental variations (temperature and humidity) on Fusarium graminearum in broiler and pig feed
- Osias Thabo Ramoeletsi1
- Olerato Tumiso Sebolao1
- Martha Cebile Jobe2*corresponding author
- Mulunda Mwanza1,2
- 1Department of Animal Health, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa
- 2Food Security and Safety Niche, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa
Abstract
Fusarium-related mycotoxins are a major concern in livestock feeds due to their toxicity and potential for co-occurrence, which can cause additive or synergistic effects. This study investigated the influence of temperature and moisture content on fusarium-associated mycotoxin production in pig and broiler feeds. Feeds were inoculated with the Fusarium graminearum and incubated under controlled temperatures (30-40 °C) and moisture levels (8-15%), and mycotoxins including deoxynivalenol (DON), Fusarenone-X (FUX), fumonisins B 1 and B 2 (FB 1, FB 2), ochratoxin A (OTA), T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, and zearalenone (ZEN) were quantified using LCMS. Results showed that temperature was the primary driver of mycotoxin production, while moisture content modulated mycotoxin magnitude and diversity in a feed-dependent manner. In pig feed, fumonisins were predominantly produced at 30 °C under low moisture, with FB 1 reaching 1850 µg/kg. DON and FUX were detected across a wider temperature range, whereas ZEN remained relatively stable. OTA, T-2, and HT-2 toxins were infrequently detected. Broiler feed showed similar patterns, with DON and FUX consistently present, fumonisins largely restricted to lower temperatures, and ZEN stable across conditions. Co-occurrence of multiple mycotoxins was most pronounced at lower temperatures, highlighting the risk of chronic multi-toxin exposure. Overall, these findings emphasize the importance of optimized feed storage and multi-mycotoxin monitoring. Feed-specific mitigation strategies, including antifungal additives or plant-derived bioactive compounds, may help reduce mycotoxin accumulation and safeguard livestock health and productivity.
Keywords
1 Introduction
Mycotoxin levels in animal feed have been reported to be higher than those in humans who eat comparatively well-refined and processed meals (Yang et al., 2020). Food, feed, and agricultural products contaminated with mycotoxin have become a serious concern because these toxic substances can cause various problems that result in a variety of health problems, from acute to chronic problems in both animals and humans (Khan, 2024). Globally, the major threats to food safety, mycotoxin contamination, remain one of the most persistent and economically damaging challenges (Latham et al., 2023). Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by filamentous fungi, particularly species of the genera Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium. Among the toxigenic fungi, Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium verticillioides are of particular concern due to their ability to produce highly toxic fumonisins (FBs), trichothecenes, especially deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) (Mesterhazy, 2024; Sherif et al., 2023). These mycotoxins are commonly found in cereal-based feed ingredients such as maize, wheat, and barley, which form the backbone of broiler and pig diets. DON is known to cause feed refusal and reduced weight gain (Hooft and Bureau, 2021), and intestinal barrier dysfunction (Chen et al., 2024), especially in pigs, while ZEN exhibits strong estrogenic effects, leading to reproductive disorders, while also posing serious food safety risks through carry-over into meat products (Jing et al., 2022).
The growth and development of Fusarium spp is widely affected by environmental factors such as temperature and humidity (Ezrari et al., 2021; Peter Mshelia et al., 2020). Since Africa’s agricultural production is entirely dependent on weather and climatic variables, the continent is particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and the production of mycotoxins. These factors play a central role in the growth of Fusarium spp, especially in contaminating poultry and pig feed. Efficient reduction of mycotoxins in Africa will require an understanding of the various causes of elevated concentrations of these toxins in African foods (Nji et al., 2022).
Temperature has a direct influence on the growth and development of F. graminearum. Research has shown that the optimal temperature for growth of F. graminearum is between 25–30 °C, with faster growth rates observed in this temperature range (Liu et al., 2022). As temperatures increase due to climate change and seasonal variations, the risk of F. graminearum in crops and subsequently in feed increases. Humidity is another important environmental factor affecting F. graminearum growth and mycotoxin production. F. graminearum thrives in conditions of high relative humidity, especially during the flowering and seeding stages of cereal crops (Manstretta and Rossi, 2016; Zhu et al., 2023). The economic impact of F. graminearum-associated mycotoxicosis in livestock production is therefore substantial. Increasing humidity in storage facilities can also contribute to fungal growth and mycotoxin contamination in stored feed. While fusarium mycotoxin contamination in animal feeds is well documented, few studies have systematically compared pig versus broiler feed under controlled temperature and moisture gradients. Moreover, limited research has explored the interactive effects of temperature and moisture on co-occurrence patterns of multiple fusarium-related mycotoxins. This study addresses these gaps by evaluating how temperature and moisture interactions influence the production of DON, FUX, ZEN, T-2, HT-2, and OTA in different feed matrices. The selection of broiler and pig grower feed in this study was motivated by their critical role in ensuring food security, income generation, and nutritional sustainability in rural and peri-urban communities. Broiler and pig grower feeds are particularly susceptible to contamination by mycotoxins because they are typically composed of cereals such as maize and soybean meal, which are highly vulnerable to fungal infection during storage and handling (Nji and Mwanza, 2024; Yu and Pedroso, 2023). In small-scale farming settings, limitations in storage infrastructure, environmental control, and quality monitoring (Touch et al., 2024) increase the risk of fungal proliferation and subsequent mycotoxin production. This makes these feed types ideal matrices for investigating real-world contamination scenarios. This is particularly relevant in smallholder systems, where regulatory oversight may be limited, and contaminated feed may go undetected. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of temperature and humidity variations on fusarium-related mycotoxin production. The findings are particularly relevant in the context of climate change, where increased temperatures and humidity can exacerbate fungal proliferation and toxin formation, threatening animal health, feed safety, and food security. It can also inform targeted interventions, including improved storage practices, feed management strategies, and the development of natural antifungal agents, ultimately contributing to safer food systems and enhanced farmer resilience.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
Chemicals such as HPLC grade acetonitrile, water, and acetic acid were purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Filter syringe 0.22 µm (Membrane solutions, Auburn, Washington USA), potato dextrose agar (PDA) was purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
2.2 Experimental design and feed preparation
The study was conducted in the Animal Health Laboratory at North-West University (Mafikeng campus). Fusarium strain was obtained from the Animal Health Laboratory and was previously identified as F. graminearum. The strain was revived on PDA prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min. The strain was inoculated at the center of the PDA plate and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days to allow sufficient mycelial growth. Spores were then harvested by weighing 5 g of fungal material and diluting it in 100 mL of sterile distilled water to prepare the inoculum. Broiler and pig grower feeds (Siyakhula PTY) used in this study were purchased at the feed store at the Mahikeng industrial site (NW, South Africa). Feed represents composite feed matrices formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of poultry and swine during early growth stages. Broiler grower typically consists of maize as the primary energy source, supplemented with soybean meal and other protein sources such as fish meal, along with vegetable oil, mineral sources, salt, and a vitamin/mineral premix. This formulation provides a crude protein content of approximately 20-23%. Pig grower feed similarly contains maize as the main energy component, combined with soybean meal, wheat bran, and small amounts of animal protein sources, minerals, and vitamin/mineral premixes, resulting in an average crude protein content of approximately 16-18% as shown in Table 1. The complex composition of these compounded feeds, which includes carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and minerals, may influence fungal growth dynamics, mycotoxin production, and interactions between toxins and matrix components during extraction and analysis. Different moisture and temperature conditions were established to evaluate their influence on fungal growth and mycotoxin production. The experiment was conducted as shown in Figure 1, briefly, 200 g of feed samples were placed in sterilized flasks and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min to eliminate existing microorganisms. The feed was subsequently dried in an oven at 100 °C for 24 h to achieve 0% moisture content and to allow the samples to equilibrate prior to inoculation. Each feed sample was inoculated with 2 mL of the prepared F. graminearum spore suspension (2 × 105 spores/mL). Sterile water was added to adjust the moisture content to 8%, 10%, 12%, or 15%. The inoculated feed samples were then incubated at controlled temperatures of 30, 35, 37, and 41 °C using a laboratory incubator, and temperature was monitored using a calibrated digital thermometer to ensure stable experimental conditions for 21 days. The selected temperature and moisture ranges were chosen to reflect environmental conditions commonly encountered during feed storage in tropical and subtropical regions, as well as to capture the threshold effects of water availability on Fusarium growth and mycotoxin production (Paterson and Lima, 2010). Temperatures of 30-41 °C simulate both moderate and extreme storage conditions, while moisture contents of 8-15% encompass typical feed moisture levels and conditions of improper storage that may favor fungal colonization. Samples were mixed and monitored weekly to ensure uniform growth. All experiments were conducted in four flasks, and the entire experiment was repeated three times to ensure reproducibility and statistical reliability.
Table 1. Feed composition for broiler and pig grower feed.
| Broiler grower | Pig grower | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients % | ||
| Corn | 61.10 | 68.32 |
| Soybean meal | 34.60 | 25.00 |
| Soybean oil | – | 1.00 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.50 | 0.80 |
| Oyster shells | 1.00 | – |
| Meat and bone meal | – | 3.35 |
| Vitamin-mineral premix | 0.50 | 0.10 |
| L-lysine | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| NaCl | 0.35 | 1.00 |
| DL-methionine | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| Threonine | 0.24 | 0.13 |
| Termin 8b | 0.10 | – |
| Chemical composition (g/kg) | ||
| Protein (min) | 180 | 140 |
| Methionine (min) | 4.50 | 2.70 |
| Moisture (max) | 120 | 120 |
| Fat (min) | 25 | 25 |
| Fibre | 60 | 80 |
| Calcium (min-max) | 7-12 | 6-10 |
| Phosphorus (min) | 4.50 | 5 |

2.3 Extraction preparation for mycotoxin analyses
The extraction of Fusarium spp mycotoxins from feed samples was done following (Dada et al., 2020). Briefly, 5 g of the respective feed sample was weighed into 50 mL centrifuge tubes and extracted for 24 h at 180 rpm on a GFL 3017 rotary shaker (GFL, Burgwedel, Germany) with 20 mL of extraction solvent (acetonitrile/water/acetic acid 79:20:1, v/v/v). Then, samples were vortexed for 10 minutes and filtered through the Whatman filter paper. The filtrate was then diluted in a 1:1 ratio with a dilution solvent (acetonitrile/water/acetic acid 20:79:1, v/v/v) and transferred into amber vials through filtering with a 0.22 µm filter syringe.
2.4 Mycotoxin analysis using liquid chromatography mass spectrophotometry
For the analysis, Shimadzu 8050 LC-MS/MS System (Shimadzu Cooporation, Kyoto, Japan), incorporating a Turbo Ion Spray electrospray ionization (ESI) source alongside an 1100 Series HPLC System. Shimadzu C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm) (Shimadzu Cooporation, Kyoto, Japan) with mobile phase A (10 mM ammonium acetate in water) and B (2% acetic acid in methanol) kept at 50 °C was used. A binary mobile phase gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min-1 and 10 µL injection volume was used for both the standard and the samples. The ESI-MS/MS source temperature operated at 550 °C, in the multiple reaction monitoring mode, both in positive and negative polarities, in two separate chromatographic runs per sample by scanning two fragmentation reactions per analyte. Further MS parameters were as follows: curtain gas 10 psi (69 kPa of max. 99.5% nitrogen); ion source gas 1 (sheath gas) 50 psi (345 kPa of nitrogen); ion source gas 2 (drying gas) 50 psi (345 kPa of nitrogen); ion spray voltage −4000 V and +4000 V respectively, collision-activated dissociation gas (nitrogen) high. The concentration of mycotoxins was expressed as µg/kg. Table 2 shows the MRM of different mycotoxins.
Table 2. Multiple reaction monitoring transitions, mass spectrometer conditions, and retention times of the determined mycotoxins.
| Mycotoxin | Retention time (min) | Precursor (m/z) |
|---|---|---|
| Deoxynivalenol | 2,410 | 355,10>295,10 |
| 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol | 7,959 | 339,10>261,10 |
| Nivalenol | 1,641 | 371,10>281,10 |
| Fusarenone-X | 5,606 | 413,10>353,10 |
| Fumonisin B1 | 9,678 | 722,40>334,10 |
| Fumonisin B2 | 10,405 | 706,40>336,10 |
| Fumonisin B3 | 10,404 | 706,40>336,10 |
| Ochratoxin A | 10,329 | 404,10>239,10 |
| T-2 toxin | 10,227 | 484,30>185,10 |
| HT-2 | 9,821 | 442,20>263,10 |
| Zearalenone | 10,547 | 317,10>131,10 |
| alpha-ZEL | 10,560 | 319,20>275,10 |
| Diacetoxyscirpenol | 9,360 | 384,20>307,10 |
2.5 Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of temperature, moisture content, and their interaction on fungal growth and mycotoxin production.
3 Results
3.1 Mycotoxin production under different environmental conditions
3.1.1 Effect of temperature and moisture on mycotoxin production
Temperature and moisture content significantly influenced mycotoxin production, with clear evidence of interaction effects between these factors for several fusarium-related toxins (Tables 3, 4). The fusarium-associated mycotoxins detected were DON, FUX, FB1, FB2, OTA, T-2 toxin, and HT-2 toxin. Overall, mycotoxin production varied markedly in response to changes in temperature and moisture content. Table 1 summarizes the effects of temperature and moisture content on fusarium-related mycotoxin production in pig feed. Fumonisins (FB1 and FB2) were predominantly produced at 30 °C, with FB1 exhibiting the highest concentrations under these conditions across all moisture contents, reaching a maximum of 1850 µg/kg. Fumonisin production was most pronounced under lower moisture conditions and was largely suppressed at temperatures ≥35 °C, irrespective of moisture level. At 40 °C, FB1 and FB2 were not detected at any moisture content.
Table 3. Effect of temperature and moisture content on fusarium mycotoxin production (µg/kg) in pig feed (Mean ± SD; n = 4).
| Temperature (°C) | Moisture content (%) | DON | FUX | FB1 | FB2 | OTA | T2 | HT2 | ZEN | DAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 8 | 613.62 ± 58.47 | 522.97 ± 80.79 | 1850.04 ± 31.54 | 187.85 ± 56.17 | 9.442 ± 4.31 | 585.50 ± 14.75 | 383.28 ± 12.69 | 247.76 ± 42.62 | 413.19 ± 86.79 |
| 10 | ND | 426.27 ± 10.99 | 932.78 ± 15.01 | 89.16 ± 1.25 | ND | 353.37 ± 39.87 | ND | 1.37 ± 0.09 | ND | |
| 12 | ND | 451.97 ± 46.71 | 1365.85 ± 1.07 | 116.22 ± 0.97 | ND | ND | ND | 1.86 ± 0.06 | 336.44 ± 4.18 | |
| 15 | ND | 467.14 ± 72.48 | 1154.64 ± 0.00 | 115.73 ± 0.04 | ND | ND | ND | 3.02 ± 10.07 | ||
| 35 | 8 | ND | 321.32 ± 8.12 | 963.86 ± 0.45 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 4.35 ± 0.16 | ND |
| 10 | 207.68 ± 0.26 | 425.25 ± 12.36 | ND | 115.71 ± 0.05 | ND | ND | ND | 2.38 ± 0.05 | 334.15 ± 3.51 | |
| 12 | 307.73 ± 0.23 | 439.40 ± 26.46 | ND | 115.68 ± 0.10 | ND | ND | ND | 1.37 ± 0.03 | ND | |
| 15 | 307.08 ± 0.00 | 319.29 ± 10.05 | ND | 115.75 ± 0.25 | ND | ND | ND | 0.45 ± 0.00 | ||
| 37 | 8 | 418.43 ± 1.46 | 408.49 ± 32.97 | ND | ND | 3.97 ± 0.04 | ND | ND | 1.42 ± 0.04 | ND |
| 10 | 308.46 ± 2.29 | 316.18 ± 6.17 | ND | ND | 5.90 ± 0.32 | ND | ND | 1.22 ± 0.09 | ND | |
| 12 | 408.23 ± 1.72 | 451.64 ± 31.76 | ND | ND | ND | 183.06 ± 2.11 | ND | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 332.78 ± 2.60 | |
| 15 | 509.16 ± 2.06 | 529.41 ± 10.85 | ND | ND | 5.96 ± 0.04 | ND | ND | 1.56 ± 0.09 | 375.70 ± 0.14 | |
| 40 | 8 | 407.68 ± 0.65 | 432.85 ± 18.85 | ND | ND | 3.96 ± 0.02 | ND | ND | 2.40 ± 1.08 | 344.06 ± 0.52 |
| 10 | 411.50 ± 1.39 | 468.97 ± 24.96 | ND | ND | 13.92 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | 1.04 ± 0.45 | 331.65 ± 0.34 | |
| 12 | 531.39 ± 3.51 | 473.05 ± 19.51 | ND | ND | 6.97 ± 0.06 | 183.07 ± 1.08 | 240.50 ± 17.34 | 1.22 ± 0.28 | 303.37 ± 0.53 | |
| 15 | 510.95 ± 1.55 | 454.55 ± 22.06 | ND | ND | 4.94 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | 1.45 ± 0.05 | 334.00 ± 1.72 |
ND, not detected.
Table 4. Effect of temperature and moisture content on fusarium mycotoxin production in broiler feed (µg/kg) (Mean ± SD; n = 4).
| Temperature (°C) | Moisture Content (%) | DON | FUX | FB1 | FB2 | OTA | T2 | HT2 | ZEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 8 | 453.18 ± 29.23 | 4622.13 ± 86.34 | 278.95 ± 6.13 | 174.65 ± 0.13 | 24.15 ± 0.52 | 387.17 ± 88.43 | 274.16 ± 58.94 | 75.89 ± 0.06 |
| 10 | 329.11 ± 0.87 | 2504.68 ± 18.81 | 182.05 ± 67.49 | 275.03 ± 1.18 | 23.48 ± 0.33 | 518.92 ± 7.10 | 1419.28 ± 28.63 | 68.84 ± 0.13 | |
| 12 | 431.16 ± 10.27 | 5255.13 ± 49.28 | 270.82 ± 37.21 | 312.25 ± 78.18 | 23.91 ± 0.47 | 405.52 ± 34.52 | 3061.33 ± 40.56 | 65.92 ± 2.00 | |
| 15 | 333.45 ± 10.23 | 3155.77 ± 13.13 | 222.79 ± 27.30 | 176.62 ± 1.29 | 24.04 ± 0.91 | 343.44 ± 23.00 | 1530.49 ± 30.68 | 66.94 ± 1.94 | |
| 35 | 8 | 437.21 ± 0.00 | 3158.83 ± 90.82 | 368.52 ± 0.11 | 130.46 ± 5.88 | ND | 316.99 ± 18.24 | 1324.85 ± 61.34 | 60.81 ± 0.22 |
| 10 | 440.95 ± 11.93 | 4577.20 ± 29.65 | ND | 140.53 ± 1.22 | ND | 398.20 ± 44.04 | 2619.02 ± 23.14 | 62.78 ± 0.56 | |
| 12 | 455.48 ± 0.00 | 3015.98 ± 15.79 | ND | ND | ND | 374.18 ± 12.36 | 848.85 ± 55.50 | ND | |
| 15 | 401.66 ± 0.00 | 1759.90 ± 66.04 | ND | ND | ND | 349.75 ± 18.49 | 1667.34 ± 49.23 | 62.94 ± 1.00 | |
| 37 | 8 | 431.71 ± 0.25 | 4853.69 ± 27.19 | ND | ND | ND | 59.79 ± 0.00 | ND | 68.72 ± 0.25 |
| 10 | 443.33 ± 3.00 | 2934.37 ± 15.79 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 66.94 ± 0.33 | |
| 12 | 503.50 ± 55.86 | 2801.48 ± 29.02 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 67.95 ± 0.98 | |
| 15 | ND | 2902.82 ± 69.27 | ND | 122.48 ± 0.54 | ND | ND | ND | 68.82 ± 0.18 | |
| 40 | 8 | ND | 2867.21 ± 56.41 | ND | 130.51 ± 2.80 | ND | 60.40 ± 1.20 | ND | 77.94 ± 0.00 |
| 10 | 443.75 ± 1.00 | 3013.72 ± 17.73 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 72.02 ± 0.00 | |
| 12 | 426.00 ± 12.30 | 2551.90 ± 59.25 | 398.52 ± 2.66 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 68.79 ± 0.14 | |
| 15 | ND | 3493.76 ± 15.46 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 69.80 ± 0.09 |
ND, not detected.
Deoxynivalenol production showed a strong temperature dependence, with the highest concentrations observed at 30 °C, particularly at lower moisture content. DON concentrations declined as temperature increased. At 35 °C, DON was consistently detected at 10-15% moisture content, with concentrations ranging from 207.01 to 307.74 µg/kg. At 37 °C, DON and FUX were consistently detected across all moisture levels, with DON concentrations ranging from 418.43 to 509.17 µg/kg. Similarly, at 40 °C, DON and FUX remained consistently present across all moisture levels. Detectable levels of ZEN were primarily observed at higher temperatures and intermediate moisture contents with consistent concentrations of average 1.36 µg/kg. In contrast, OTA and the trichothecenes (T-2 and HT-2 toxins) were detected occasionally and did not display a consistent interaction pattern between temperature and moisture content. OTA was detected at low concentrations at 37 °C (3.91 - 5.96 µg/kg) and 40 °C (3.96 - 13.92 µg/kg) across moisture contents. T-2 and HT-2 toxins were detected only at 12% moisture content, with high concentrations of 183.01 µg/kg and 240.51 µg/kg, respectively. Additionally, DAS was detected only at 12 - 15% moisture content, with concentrations ranging from 332.78 to 413.79 µg/kg.
Table 4 shows the production in broiler feed, where DON production showed a strong interaction pattern, particularly at lower temperatures. At 30 °C, DON concentrations varied substantially with moisture content, with elevated levels observed at 8% and 12% moisture, while markedly reduced concentrations occurred at 10% and 15%. As the temperature increased to 35-37 °C, DON levels remained relatively high across most moisture levels but exhibited reduced sensitivity to moisture variation. At 40 °C, DON production became inconsistent and was undetectable at certain moisture contents, indicating that moisture effects on DON biosynthesis were temperature-dependent in broiler feed. Fusarenone-X was consistently detected across all temperature and moisture combinations, but its concentration was strongly influenced by their interaction. The highest FUX levels were recorded at 30 °C, particularly at 12% moisture, after which concentrations declined with increasing temperature. However, the magnitude of this decline varied by moisture level, demonstrating that FUX production in broiler feed was not governed by temperature alone but by the combined effect of both environmental factors. Fumonisins (FB1 and FB2) exhibited a pronounced interaction dominated by temperature sensitivity. At 30 °C, both FB1 and FB2 were detected at appreciable levels, with concentrations strongly influenced by moisture content. In contrast, fumonisin production was largely suppressed at temperatures ≥35 °C regardless of moisture level, indicating that moisture-driven effects on fumonisin biosynthesis occurred only under permissive temperature conditions in broiler feed.
Zearalenone showed minimal variation across temperature and moisture treatments, with relatively stable concentrations detected under most conditions, suggesting a weak interaction effect and greater environmental stability in broiler feed matrices. Trichothecenes T-2 and HT-2 toxins displayed moisture-dependent variability at 30 °C, particularly at intermediate moisture levels, but were sporadically detected or absent at higher temperatures, indicating sensitivity to combined temperature and moisture stress. Ochratoxin A was detected only at lower temperatures and was absent under most high-temperature conditions, limiting the expression of a consistent interaction pattern. Figure 2 shows mycotoxin concentrations in pig and broiler feed across temperature and moisture combinations using heatmaps.
![Heatmaps showing fusarium-related mycotoxin concentrations in pig and broiler feed across temperature and moisture combinations. (Heatmaps illustrate the levels of eight mycotoxins [**(A)** DON, **(B)** FUX, **(C)** FB<sub>1</sub>, **(D)** FB<sub>2</sub>, **(E)** OTA, **(F)** T-2 toxin, **(G)** HT-2 toxin, **(H)** ZEN] measured in feed incubated at four temperatures (30, 35, 37, 40 °C) and four moisture contents (8%, 10%, 12%, 15%) for 21 days. Color gradients (yellow → red) represent increasing concentrations (µg/kg), with annotated values shown in each cell. Not detected (ND) values are left blank. These heatmaps highlight the interactive effects of temperature and moisture on mycotoxin production and allow comparison of toxin-specific response patterns, revealing conditions that favor or suppress individual and co-occurring fusarium toxins).](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1810614/xml-images/ffunb-07-1810614-g002.webp)
4 Discussion
The present study demonstrates that temperature and moisture play a critical role in fusarium-related mycotoxin production in both pig and broiler feed, with distinct toxin profiles emerging under different environmental conditions. Similar environmental dependencies have been widely reported for Fusarium spp, where secondary metabolite biosynthesis is strongly regulated by temperature, water activity, and substrate composition (Magan et al., 2011; Marin et al., 2013).
In pig feed, fumonisins (FB1 and FB2) were most prominently produced at 30 °C, particularly under lower moisture conditions, with FB1 reaching peak concentrations. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that fumonisin production by Fusarium verticillioides is optimal at moderate temperatures (25 - 30 °C) and relatively low water activity (aw 0.95-0.98) (Medina et al., 2013). The marked suppression of fumonisin production at temperatures above 35 °C, regardless of moisture content, suggests that temperature exerts a dominant regulatory effect on fumonisin biosynthetic gene expression, as reported in earlier molecular and ecological study of (Fanelli et al., 2013). However, in broiler feed, fumonisin production was also largely restricted to lower temperatures, although concentrations were generally lower and more variable than those observed in pig feed. This difference may be attributed to variations in feed composition, including starch availability, lipid content, and micronutrient composition, all of which influence fungal growth and secondary metabolism (Wokorach et al., 2021). Pig feed generally contains a higher starch content due to its cereal-based formulation, which may provide a favorable substrate for fungal growth and subsequent mycotoxin production, whereas broiler feed is characterized by a higher crude protein content that may influence fungal metabolism and toxin biosynthesis differently.
Deoxynivalenol production showed a strong temperature-dependent pattern across both feed matrices. In pig feed, DON concentrations were highest at 30 °C, particularly under lower moisture conditions, and declined as temperature increased. This agrees with previous reports indicating that DON biosynthesis is favored at moderate temperatures and is sensitive to thermal stress (Kolawole et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2023). In contrast, in broiler feed, DON remained consistently detectable across a wider temperature range (35-40 °C), especially at intermediate moisture contents. This sustained production under elevated temperatures suggests that substrate composition may buffer environmental stress and support trichothecene biosynthesis, a phenomenon previously described in cereal-based matrices (Zhao et al., 2025).
Fusarenone-X was consistently detected across all temperature and moisture combinations in both pig and broiler feed and occurred at substantially higher concentrations than other fusarium-related mycotoxins. This ubiquitous presence is consistent with earlier studies reporting that fusaric acid production is less sensitive to environmental fluctuations than other mycotoxins and often co-occurs with DON and fumonisins (Bacon et al., 1996). Importantly, fusaric acid has been shown to enhance the toxicity of other fusarium spp mycotoxins, even at relatively low concentrations, raising concerns about synergistic effects in contaminated feeds (Ogunbo et al., 2007; López-díaz et al., 2018). Stable concentrations of ZEN were observed across temperature and moisture content in broiler feed, whereas greater variability was observed in pig feed. The persistence of ZEN at higher temperatures contrasts with the temperature sensitivity observed for fumonisins and reflects differences in the regulation of polyketide-derived estrogenic compounds (Ryu et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2015). Despite its relatively low concentrations, the consistent presence of ZEN is relevant from a feed safety perspective due to its cumulative estrogenic effects, particularly in pigs and poultry (EFSA et al., 2017).
Ochratoxin A and the type A trichothecenes (T-2 and HT-2 toxins) in both feed matrices did not exhibit a consistent temperature-moisture interaction pattern. Their intermittent occurrence is consistent with previous reports indicating that these toxins are produced by a narrower range of fungal species and are more sensitive to environmental stressors than DON or fumonisins (Eskola et al., 2020). In broiler feed, the detection of T-2 and HT-2 toxins primarily at 12% moisture content suggests that moderate moisture levels may be critical for their biosynthesis, as reported in controlled storage studies (Magan et al., 2011). Although F. graminearum was the fungal species intentionally used for inoculation in this study, it should be noted that some of the detected mycotoxins may not be exclusively associated with this species. Certain toxins could originate from background contamination.
Overall, the comparative analysis of pig and broiler feed indicates that temperature is the primary driver of fusarium-related mycotoxin production, while moisture content acts as a modifying factor whose impact depends on feed matrix composition. Lower temperatures favored the co-occurrence of multiple mycotoxins, whereas higher temperatures selectively supported DON and fusaric acid production, fumonisin being highly temperature-restricted, and ZEN displaying relative stability across environmental conditions. These findings are consistent with current ecological models of mycotoxin biosynthesis and emphasize the importance of feed-specific storage and management strategies (Marin et al., 2013; Eskola et al., 2020). It further emphasizes the importance of controlling temperature and moisture content during feed storage to reduce mycotoxin risk. The study further confirms that, in addition to the two selected abiotic factors evaluated, other environmental variables such as pH and light exposure were not considered, yet these factors may significantly influence mycotoxin production by fungi (Magan and Aldred, 2007; Bennett and Klich, 2003). Environmental pH can affect enzymatic activity and fungal metabolism, while light conditions may regulate secondary metabolite gene expression (Paterson and Lima, 2010). Furthermore, it is important to recognize the influence of feed composition on mycotoxin production. The nutritional matrix, including carbohydrate source, protein content, lipid composition, and micronutrient availability, can modulate fungal growth dynamics and the activation of toxin biosynthesis pathways (Payne and Brown, 1998). The findings therefore reinforce that mycotoxin production is a multifactorial process dependent not only on specific abiotic conditions but also on the substrate (matrix) composition and biotic interactions within the environment. This highlights the complexity of predicting mycotoxin contamination and the necessity of adopting an integrated approach when assessing fungal toxin risk in feed systems (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2012; Magan and Aldred, 2007).
5 Conclusion, limitations, and future perspectives
This study demonstrated that temperature and moisture content are key determinants of mycotoxin production in pig and broiler feed, with distinct toxin profiles and concentrations observed across different environmental conditions. Temperature emerged as the primary driver of mycotoxin occurrence, while moisture content acted as a modifying factor influencing toxin diversity and magnitude in a feed-dependent manner. Lower temperatures, particularly around 30 °C, promoted the co-production of multiple mycotoxins, including Fumonisin, deoxynivalenol, fusarenone-X, zearalenone, and trichothecenes, whereas higher temperatures generally suppressed fumonisin production while allowing sustained production of deoxynivalenol and fusaric acid. Comparative evaluation of pig and broiler feed highlighted the influence of feed matrix composition on fungal metabolism and toxin biosynthesis. The frequent co-occurrence of multiple mycotoxins across temperature and moisture combinations underscores the risk of chronic multi-toxin exposure in livestock, which may result in additive or synergistic adverse effects on animal health and performance. Despite these findings, several limitations are acknowledged. The study was conducted under controlled experimental conditions, which may not fully replicate the complexity and variability of commercial feed storage environments. Only a defined range of temperatures and moisture contents was evaluated, and other influential factors such as storage duration, oxygen availability, fungal community dynamics, and feed formulation variability were not assessed. In addition, mycotoxin production was evaluated based on concentration measurements, without direct assessment of fungal biomass or gene expression, which could provide further insight into regulatory mechanisms underlying toxin biosynthesis.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
Edited by: Munusamy Madhaiyan, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
Reviewed by: Mohanad Faris Abdulhameed, University of Basrah, Iraq
Rogério D’Antonio Pires, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Statements
- Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
- Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
- Author contributions
OR: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. OS: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MJ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
References
- Bacon C. W., Porter J. K., Norred W. P., Leslie J. F. (1996). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62 (11), 4039–4043.
- Bennett J. W., Klich M. (2003). Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 497 – 516. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/b978-012373944-5.00333-3
- Chen J., Zhang X., He Z., Xiong D., Long M. (2024). Damage on intestinal barrier function and microbial detoxification of deoxynivalenol: A review. J. Integr. Agric. 23, 2507 – 2524. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.jia.2023.11.038
- Dada T. A., Ekwomadu T. I., Mwanza M. (2020). Multi mycotoxin determination in dried beef using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Toxins 12 (6), 357. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/toxins12060357
- EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) Knutsen H. K., Alexander J., Barregård L., Bignami M., Brüschweiler B.. (2017). Risks for animal health related to the presence of zearalenone and its modified forms in feed 15. doi:, PMID: doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4851
- Eskola M., Kos G., Elliott C. T., Hajšlová J., Mayar S., Krska R. (2020). Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: Validity of the widely cited ‘FAO estimate’ of 25%. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 60, 2773 – 2789. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570
- Ezrari S., Radouane N., Tahiri A., Amiri S., Lazraq A., Lahlali R. (2021). Environmental effects of temperature and water potential on mycelial growth of Neocosmospora solani and Fusarium spp. causing dry root rot of citrus. Curr. Microbiol. 78, 3092 – 3103. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1007/s00284-021-02570-1
- Fanelli F., Iversen A., Logrieco A. F., Mulè G. (2013). Relationship between fumonisin production and FUM gene expression in Fusarium verticillioides under different environmental conditions. Food. Additives. Contaminants.: Part. A. 30, 365 – 371. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1080/19440049.2012.743039
- Hooft J. M., Bureau D. P. (2021). Deoxynivalenol: Mechanisms of action and its effects on various terrestrial and aquatic species. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 157, 112616. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.fct.2021.112616
- Huang W., Zhou P., Shen G., Gao T., Liu X., Shi J.. (2023). Relationship between mycotoxin production and gene expression in Fusarium graminearum species complex strains under various environmental conditions. J. Microbiol. 61, 525 – 542. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1007/s12275-023-00046-4
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, (Lyon, Chemical Agents and Related Occupations). Vol. 100F.
- Jing S., Liu C., Zheng J., Dong Z., Guo N. (2022). Toxicity of zearalenone and its nutritional intervention by natural products. Food. Funct. 13, 10374 – 10400. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1039/d2fo01545e
- Khan R. (2024). Mycotoxins in food: Occurrence, health implications, and control strategies-a comprehensive review. Toxicon 248, 108038. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.108038
- Kolawole O., Meneely J., Petchkongkaew A., Elliott C. (2021). A review of mycotoxin biosynthetic pathways: Associated genes and their expressions under the influence of climatic factors. Fungal Biol. Rev. 37, 8 – 26. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2021.04.003
- Latham R. L., Boyle J. T., Barbano A., Loveman W. G., Brown N. A. (2023). Diverse mycotoxin threats to safe food and feed cereals. Essays. Biochem. 67, 797 – 809. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1042/ebc20220221
- Liu N., Chen Y., Liu J., Su Q., Zhao B., Sun M.. (2022). Transcriptional differences between major Fusarium pathogens of maize, Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium graminearum with different optimum growth temperatures. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1030523
- López-díaz C., Rahjoo V., Sulyok M., Ghionna V., Martín-Vicente A., Capilla J.. (2018). Fusaric acid contributes to virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 440 – 453.
- Magan N., Aldred D. (2007). Why do fungi produce mycotoxins ? Food Addit. Contam. 24, 1033 – 1040.
- Magan N., Medina A., Aldred D. (2011). Possible climate‐change effects on mycotoxin contamination of food crops pre‐and postharvest. Plant Pathol. 60, 150 – 163. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02412.x
- Manstretta V., Rossi V. (2016). Effects of temperature and moisture on development of Fusarium graminearum Perithecia in maize stalk residues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 184 – 191. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1128/aem.02436-15
- Marin S., Ramos A. J., Cano-Sancho G., Sanchis V. (2013). Mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 60, 218 – 237. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.047
- Medina A., Schmidt-Heydt M., Cárdenas-Chávez D., Parra R., Geisen R., Magan N. (2013). Integrating toxin gene expression, growth and fumonisin B1 and B2 production by a strain of Fusarium verticillioides under different environmental factors. J. R. Soc Interface 10, 20130320. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0320
- Mesterhazy A. (2024). Food safety aspects of breeding maize to multi-resistance against the major (Fusarium graminearum, F. verticillioides, Aspergillus flavus) and minor toxigenic fungi (Fusarium spp.) as well as to toxin accumulation, trends, and solutions-a review. J. Fungi. 10. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/jof10010040
- Nji Q. N., Babalola O. O., Ekwomadu T. I., Nleya N., Mwanza M. (2022). Six main contributing factors to high levels of mycotoxin contamination in African foods. Toxins. (Basel). 14 (5), 318. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/toxins14050318
- Nji Q. N., Mwanza M. (2024). Three-year multi-mycotoxin analysis of South African commercial maize from three provinces. Front. Fungal Biol. 5. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3389/ffunb.2024.1426782
- Ogunbo S., Broomhead J., Ledoux D., Bermudez A., Rottinghaus G. (2007). The individual and combined effects of fusaric acid and T-2 toxin in broilers and Turkeys. Int. J. Poultry. Sci. 6, 484 – 488. doi: doi:10.3923/ijps.2007.484.488
- Paterson R. R. M., Lima N. (2010). How will climate change affect mycotoxins in food ? Food Res. Int. 43, 1902 – 1914. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.010
- Payne G. A., Brown M. P. (1998). Genetics and physiology of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36, 329 – 362. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.329
- Peter Mshelia L., Selamat J., Iskandar Putra Samsudin N., Rafii M. Y., Abdul Mutalib N. A., Nordin N.. (2020). Effect of temperature, water activity and carbon dioxide on fungal growth and mycotoxin production of acclimatised isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Toxins. (Basel). 12 (8), 478. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/toxins12080478
- Ryu D., Jackson L. S., Bullerman L. B. J. M., Safety F. (2002). Effects of processing on zearalenone. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 504, 205 – 216. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0629-4_21
- Sherif M., Kirsch N., Splivallo R., Pfohl K., Karlovsky P. (2023). The role of mycotoxins in interactions between Fusarium graminearum and F. verticillioides growing in saprophytic cultures and co-infecting maize plants. Toxins. (Basel). 15 (9), 575. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/toxins15090575
- Touch V., Tan D. K. Y., Cook B. R., Liu D. L., Cross R., Tran T. A.. (2024). Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: Implications for agricultural production, environment and food security. J. Environ. Manage. 370, 122536. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122536
- Wokorach G., Landschoot S., Audenaert K., Echodu R., Haesaert G. J. M. (2021). Genetic characterization of fungal biodiversity in storage grains: Towards enhancing food safety in Northern Uganda 9, 383. doi:, PMID: doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020383
- Yang C., Song G., Lim W. (2020). Effects of mycotoxin-contaminated feed on farm animals. J. Hazard. Mater. 389, 122087. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122087
- Yu J., Pedroso I. R. (2023). Mycotoxins in cereal-based products and their impacts on the health of humans, livestock animals and pets. Toxins 15, 480. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3390/toxins15080480
- Zhang H. J., Sun L. J., Sun J., Zhang Y., Li W. X., Hu X. X.. (2015). Effects of processing on zearalenone concentrations in wheat and products made of wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 41, 1575. doi:. PMID: doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2015.01575
- Zhao X., Guo H., Huang H., Zheng M., Zhang Z., Li J.. (2025). Contamination and biotransformation of deoxynivalenol (DON) in common commercial foods: Current status, challenges and future perspectives. Green Synth. Catal. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.gresc.2025.04.008
- Zhu Y., Yao Y., Xi J., Tang C., Wu L. (2023). Modelling the effect of pH and H2S on the germination of F. graminearum spores under different temperature conditions. LWT 177, 114530. doi:. PMID: doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114530
Citation
Ramoeletsi, O. T., et al. (2026). The impact of environmental variations (temperature and humidity) on Fusarium graminearum in broiler and pig feed. Frontiers in Fungal Biology, Volume 7. https://doi.org/
- Received
- Accepted
- Published
- Volume
- 7 - 2026
Copyright
Copyright © 2026 Ramoeletsi, Sebolao, Jobe and Mwanza.
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
*Correspondence: Martha Cebile Jobe
Article metrics
- Views
- 0
- Downloads
- 0
- Citations
- 0
- Shares
- 0
