Skip to content

Review

Frontiers in Fungal Biology ·

Volume 7 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2026.1851718

Mechanisms of action and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma against Alternaria in horticultural crops: a review

  • Rafi Khalido1
  • Nia Rossiana1*corresponding author
  • Dedat Prismantoro2
  • Thomas Argyarich Jefferson1
  • Malvin Albert1
  • Nur Syafikah Abdullah3
  • Budi Irawan1
  • Mia Miranti1
  • Wiwiek Harsonowati4
  • Ravindra Chandra Joshi5
  • Febri Doni1*corresponding author
  1. 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, West Java, Indonesia
  2. 2Doctorate Program in Biotechnology, Graduate School, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  3. 3Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  4. 4Research Center for Horticulture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
  5. 5Philippine Rice Research Institute, Maligaya, Science City of Muñoz, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Fungal diseases caused by Alternaria species are major constraints to the productivity and quality of horticultural crops worldwide, resulting in significant yield losses, quality degradation, and postharvest challenges. Conventional management primarily relies on chemical fungicides; however, their extensive use raises concerns related to environmental contamination, pathogen resistance, and risks to human health. Consequently, increasing attention has shifted toward environmentally sustainable approaches such as microbial biological control agents. Among these, Trichoderma spp. have emerged as promising eco-friendly biocontrol agents due to their multifunctional interactions with plants and soil microbiomes. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the role of Trichoderma spp. in managing Alternaria -caused diseases in horticultural crops. Specific emphasis is placed on key mechanisms, including mycoparasitism, antibiosis through secondary metabolites, competition for nutrients and space, and the induction of systemic resistance in host plants. Evidence from in vitro, greenhouse, and field studies demonstrates that Trichoderma spp. can effectively suppress Alternaria pathogens while simultaneously enhancing plant growth and stress tolerance. However, the effectiveness of Trichoderma -based biocontrol strategies is influenced by environmental conditions, strain specificity, formulation stability, and interactions with indigenous microbial communities. Future research should focus on optimizing strain selection, developing robust formulations and delivery methods, and applying advanced genomic and metabolomic approaches to enhance the consistency and effectiveness of Trichoderma -based biocontrol in sustainable horticultural disease management.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Horticultural crops, including various fruits and vegetables, play a central role in global food and nutritional security. They serve as primary sources of essential micronutrients, vitamins, dietary fiber, and health-promoting phytochemicals that are frequently deficient in diets dominated by staple grains (Ahmed et al., 2024a, 2024b; Al-Salim et al., 2025). Recent reviews emphasize that the sustained production and adequate consumption of these crops are fundamental for improving dietary diversity and nutritional quality (Ahmed et al., 2024a; Kathi et al., 2024; Creedon et al., 2025). Furthermore, regular intake of fiber-rich and phytochemical-rich produce promotes balanced dietary patterns, aligning with the priorities of contemporary food systems under pressure from population growth and shifting demands (Ahmed et al., 2024a; Kathi et al., 2024; Creedon et al., 2025).

In addition to their nutritional benefits, horticultural crops significantly promote agricultural economies by generating high-value produce and supporting employment throughout the value chain. They enhance household incomes and drive export earnings, particularly within smallholder-based production systems (Fikadu et al., 2025; Widadie et al., 2024; Jaenicke and Virchow, 2018). However, this high economic and nutritional value renders these crops highly susceptible to biotic stresses (Ali et al., 2023; Prechsl et al., 2023; Kumar and Kumar, 2024). Among these threats, fungal diseases represent major constraints to productivity and quality. In particular, Alternaria species are increasingly recognized as widespread and economically damaging pathogens that affect a diverse range of horticultural hosts globally (Ali et al., 2023; Mehmood et al., 2025; Deka et al., 2024).

Pathogens within the Alternaria genus are responsible for devastating conditions such as leaf blight and early blight, leading to significant reductions in both yield and marketable quality (Prechsl et al., 2023; Yessimseitova et al., 2025; Salotti et al., 2024). While yield losses can be severe depending on the crop type and environmental conditions, Alternaria infections also compromise postharvest storage and food safety through the production of harmful mycotoxins (Prechsl et al., 2023; Yessimseitova et al., 2025; Salotti et al., 2024). This economic burden is further amplified by cosmetic defects that diminish consumer acceptability and market value, often resulting in produce being rejected or sold at lower prices (Miranda-Apodaca et al., 2023; Slathia et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2025). In tropical and subtropical regions where environmental conditions favor pathogen development, the financial losses attributable to Alternaria are substantial, requiring effective management strategies (Miranda-Apodaca et al., 2023; Slathia et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2025).

Current conventional disease management strategies exhibit several limitations that undermine their long-term effectiveness (Beg et al., 2025; Garmendia et al., 2025). Chemical fungicides remain the primary approach, yet their frequent application raises concerns regarding environmental contamination, the development of pathogen resistance, and health risks to consumers and workers (Sharma et al., 2024). While cultural practices like crop rotation and sanitation can reduce disease incidence, their efficacy is often inconsistent under high disease pressure or in resource-limited regions (Ali et al., 2023; Prechsl et al., 2023). Moreover, reliance on a single management approach frequently fails to address the complex biology of Alternaria species, which can survive in soil, seed, and crop debris to enable rapid reinfection (Salotti et al., 2024; Erdogan and Guzel, 2025). These challenges underscore the urgent need for integrated, sustainable management strategies that protect environmental health and economic viability (Deka et al., 2024; Rasiukevičiūtė et al., 2025).

The limitations of synthetic chemicals have spurred growing interest in biological control agents (BCAs) as sustainable alternatives (Lahlali et al., 2022; Ons et al., 2020; Jefferson et al., 2026a). Unlike single-target fungicides, BCAs suppress phytopathogens through multifaceted mechanisms such as antagonism, competition, and parasitism (Nguyen et al., 2025; Köhl et al., 2019). These diverse modes of action enhance disease suppression while minimizing the risk of the pathogen developing resistance. Advances in microbial screening and formulation technologies have further improved the stability and field applicability of these biological agents (Tyagi et al., 2024; Villavicencio-Vásquez et al., 2025). Additionally, rising consumer demand for residue-free produce and stricter pesticide regulations have reinforced the relevance of biocontrol within modern horticultural systems (Chikte et al., 2024).

Trichoderma spp. are rhizosphere-associated filamentous fungi that have emerged as among the most extensively studied BCAs due to their ability to suppress a broad range of pathogens and enhance plant health (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Raju and Punamalai, 2025; Jefferson et al., 2026b). These fungi are prevalent in the rhizosphere and endosphere, where they interact with plant roots and surrounding microbiomes to promote growth and suppress disease (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Santillan-Culquimboz et al., 2025). Their efficacy is rooted in multifaceted modes of action, including direct mycoparasitism, nutrient competition, antibiosis via secondary metabolites, and the induction of systemic resistance in host plants (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Jefferson et al., 2026b). Furthermore, Trichoderma spp. act as plant growth-promoting fungi by stimulating nutrient uptake and enhancing resilience to abiotic stress (Chen et al., 2025; Raju and Punamalai, 2025).

The ecological adaptability of Trichoderma spp., including their ability to colonize diverse niches and modulate microbial communities, makes them a pivotal tool for reducing dependence on chemical pesticides (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Raju and Punamalai, 2025). Consequently, Trichoderma-based approaches are increasingly regarded as core components of environmentally friendly disease management in horticultural production. This review aims to critically synthesize recent scientific evidence regarding the role of Trichoderma spp. in managing Alternaria diseases. Specifically, we consolidate current knowledge on the biological characteristics of Trichoderma spp., their antagonistic mechanisms against Alternaria species, and their effectiveness in both experimental and field settings. Furthermore, this review evaluates the potential of these biocontrol strategies within integrated disease management frameworks and identifies existing research gaps to provide an evidence-based foundation for sustainable horticultural practices.

2 Biology and pathogenicity of Alternaria

Alternaria is a taxonomically complex and ecologically versatile genus of filamentous fungi within the phylum Ascomycota, class Dothideomycetes, order Pleosporales, and family Pleosporaceae. This genus encompasses numerous species with saprophytic, endophytic, and pathogenic lifestyles across a wide range of substrates, including soil, plant tissues, seeds, and agricultural products (Li et al., 2022a; DeMers, 2022; Thomma, 2003). The taxonomy of Alternaria remains challenging because of pronounced morphological plasticity and overlapping conidial characteristics, which complicate species delimitation based solely on phenotypic traits (Li et al., 2022a; Bao et al., 2025). Consequently, recent studies have increasingly emphasized molecular phylogenetic approaches. These methods employ multilocus datasets, including ITS, β-tubulin, TEF1-α, RPB2, GAPDH, and Alt-a1, to improve taxonomic resolution and accurately delineate species boundaries within the genus (Li et al., 2022a; Bao et al., 2025). Such molecular tools have revealed substantial cryptic diversity, highlighting the limitations of traditional morphology-based classification systems (Li et al., 2022a; Bao et al., 2025; DeMers, 2022).

2.1 Major pathogenic species and host range

The most common phytopathogenic species reported globally include A. alternata, A. solani, A. brassicicola, and A. tenuissima, many of which occur as species complexes or host-associated pathotypes with broad host ranges (Yessimseitova et al., 2025; Blagojević et al., 2020; Fernandes et al., 2023). These species are associated with economically important diseases such as tomato early blight and leaf spot diseases in various horticultural crops. For example, A. alternata and A. tenuissima are frequently linked to tomato diseases, whereas A. brassicicola and A. alternata are commonly reported in leaf spot diseases affecting crops such as horseradish (Yessimseitova et al., 2025; Blagojević et al., 2020; Fernandes et al., 2023). In addition, some species, particularly A. alternata, are increasingly recognized as cryptic species complexes in which genetically similar isolates may differ substantially in host range, virulence, and toxin production, highlighting the importance of multilocus phylogenetic analyses for accurate pathogen characterization (Li et al., 2022a; Ebadi and Ebadi, 2024; DeMers, 2022).

Among the Alternaria taxa, A. solani is widely recognized as the primary causal agent of early blight in solanaceous crops such as potato and tomato, where it typically produces necrotic leaf lesions with characteristic concentric rings (Ghalib et al., 2025; Schmey et al., 2024). Under favorable environmental conditions, its characteristic necrotic lesions expand and coalesce, leading to extensive foliar damage and significant yield losses (Ghalib et al., 2025; Schmey et al., 2024). In contrast, A. alternata is a predominantly small-spored species causing leaf spot and brown spot diseases. Recent multilocus phylogenetic studies have confirmed the existence of multiple genetic lineages within the A. alternata complex that vary significantly in symptom expression and host specificity (Balodi et al., 2024; Dučkena et al., 2024; Ebadi and Ebadi, 2024).

Additionally, species such as A. tenuissima contribute to disease complexes in pepper and eggplant. Several Alternaria strains, particularly those phylogenetically related to A. tenuissima, are capable of producing multiple mycotoxins including alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether, altenuene, and tenuazonic acid (Lan et al., 2023; Habib et al., 2021; Daichi et al., 2025). The production of these secondary metabolites exacerbates host tissue damage and further complicates disease management due to both phytotoxic effects and food safety implications (Habib et al., 2021; Lan et al., 2023).

2.2 Infection process and disease cycle

Alternaria species are generally regarded as necrotrophic pathogens that rely on host cell death for nutrient acquisition (Fernandes et al., 2023; Salotti et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2022a). Following deposition on susceptible host surfaces, conidia germinate in the presence of free water or high relative humidity. The resulting germ tubes penetrate leaf tissues through stomata, wounds, or directly through the cuticle. Enzymatic degradation of the cuticular layer plays a crucial role in this initial penetration (Fernandes et al., 2023; Ma et al., 2019). Once established, the fungi secrete a wide array of cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) and phytotoxins that induce host cell necrosis, facilitate nutrient acquisition from dead tissues, and accelerate lesion expansion (Fernandes et al., 2023; Jones and Perez, 2023; Salotti et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2019).

The resulting necrotic lesions frequently serve as sources of secondary inoculum, supporting repeated cycles of conidial production and driving polycyclic disease development during the cropping season, as illustrated in Figure 1. Environmental factors such as leaf wetness duration, temperature, and host plant stress are critical in determining infection success and disease progression (Schmey et al., 2024). For instance, early blight caused by A. solani is typically favored by warm, humid conditions that enhance spore germination, penetration, and lesion development, allowing multiple infection cycles within a single growing season (Schmey et al., 2024; Fernandes et al., 2023; Jones and Perez, 2023; Salotti et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2019).

Microscopic stages of mycoparasitic interaction between *T. citrinoviride* (TC) and *Alternaria* sp. (Al). The micrographs illustrate the sequential stages of antagonistic interaction, including initial hyphal adhesion, coiling of *Trichoderma* around the host hyphae, followed by penetration of the pathogen cell wall, and subsequent lysis and deformation of *Alternaria* hyphae. These structural changes reflect cell wall degradation and cytoplasmic disintegration during the mycoparasitic process. All micrographs were obtained under light microscopy at 400× magnification. Source: Adapted from Al-Mekhlafi et al. (2025), licensed under [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Figure 1. Microscopic stages of mycoparasitic interaction between T. citrinoviride (TC) and Alternaria sp. (Al). The micrographs illustrate the sequential stages of antagonistic interaction, including initial hyphal adhesion, coiling of Trichoderma around the host hyphae, followed by penetration of the pathogen cell wall, and subsequent lysis and deformation of Alternaria hyphae. These structural changes reflect cell wall degradation and cytoplasmic disintegration during the mycoparasitic process. All micrographs were obtained under light microscopy at 400× magnification. Source: Adapted from Al-Mekhlafi et al. (2025), licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

2.3 Mechanisms of virulence

The virulence of Alternaria spp. is determined by a combination of molecular and biochemical factors that enable successful host colonization, tissue destruction, and disease progression (Nagda and Meena, 2025; Cao et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2023). Key determinants include the production of phytotoxic secondary metabolites, such as tenuazonic acid and alternariol, and the secretion of CWDEs including cellulases and pectinases. These factors often act synergistically to facilitate host tissue necrosis, suppress defense responses, and promote pathogen colonization, lesion expansion, and sporulation (Nagda and Meena, 2025; Zhan et al., 2025; Castaldi et al., 2023). Variation in the expression and composition of these virulence determinants among species and isolates contributes to differences in host range, disease severity, and epidemic potential. This variation is reflected in isolate-specific profiles of toxin production, cell wall–degrading enzyme activity, and genetic traits linked to pathogenic behavior (Nagda and Meena, 2025; Li et al., 2022b; Meena et al., 2017).

Many phytopathogenic species produce both host-specific toxins (HSTs) and non-host-specific toxins (nHSTs), which directly induce host cell death and disrupt cellular metabolism to contribute to tissue necrosis (Castaldi et al., 2023; Meena et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022b). Species within the A. alternata complex synthesize a broad range of toxins, including alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether, and tenuazonic acid, all of which are essential for symptom development and necrosis in susceptible hosts (Escrivá et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2021). Host-specific toxins function as primary virulence factors by targeting specific plant genotypes, thereby determining host susceptibility and influencing the outcome of plant–pathogen interactions (Cao et al., 2024; Meena et al., 2017; Tsuge et al., 2013). The diversity and regulation of toxin biosynthetic gene clusters among Alternaria strains generate a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites, complicating resistance breeding and disease management strategies due to strain-specific virulence profiles (Wang et al., 2022c; Kim and Dettman, 2025).

In addition to toxins, Alternaria spp. secrete a suite of CWDEs, including cellulases, pectinases, hemicellulases, and cutinases. These enzymes degrade plant cell walls, weaken host tissues, and facilitate penetration, tissue maceration, and nutrient acquisition (Ma et al., 2019; García-Calvo et al., 2018). Proteomic evidence demonstrates that these enzymes form a coordinated virulence arsenal that enhances fungal colonization and pathogenic success (Ma et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018). In necrotrophic pathotypes, the secretion of cutinases, cellulases, and pectate lyases is closely associated with lesion expansion, as mutants deficient in these enzymes exhibit significantly reduced lesion size (Ma et al., 2019). Comparative pathogenicity profiling further highlights a positive correlation between cell wall–degrading enzyme activity and virulence severity, confirming their role as essential determinants of pathogenicity in Alternaria–host interactions (Nagda and Meena, 2025).

2.4 Host-pathogen interactions

Interactions between Alternaria and their host plants represent a classical necrotrophic pathosystem in which disease progression relies on active host tissue destruction rather than prolonged colonization of living cells (Shao et al., 2025; Ma et al., 2019; Lawrence et al., 2008). Unlike biotrophic fungi that depend on living host tissues, Alternaria species exploit host cell death as a nutritional advantage and frequently convert plant defense-associated programmed cell death into susceptibility factors (Shao et al., 2025; Chung, 2012). This characteristic enables Alternaria to convert plant defense-associated cell death into a susceptibility factor, making necrosis an important component of disease progression rather than merely a symptom of infection (Mandal et al., 2019; Duhan et al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2024).

The infection process usually begins when fungal conidia adhere to the plant surface under favorable environmental conditions such as high humidity and moderate temperature (Fernandes et al., 2023; Salotti et al., 2024; Vinogradova et al., 2026). After attachment, the spores germinate and develop germ tubes and appressorium-like structures that facilitate penetration through natural openings such as stomata or through direct penetration of the cuticle and epidermal cell layers (Arya and Cohen, 2022; Fernandes et al., 2023). Following penetration, the fungus rapidly colonizes intercellular spaces and secretes various CWDEs, including cellulases, pectinases, xylanases, and cutinases, which degrade structural polysaccharides in plant tissues, weaken cell walls, and promote tissue maceration that facilitates fungal invasion and nutrient leakage (Ma et al., 2019; Rafiei et al., 2021; Fernandes et al., 2023).

A key determinant of Alternaria pathogenicity is the production of secondary metabolites and phytotoxins that directly damage host cells (Bacha et al., 2023; Salotti et al., 2024). Many Alternaria species produce host-selective toxins (HSTs), including AAL-toxin, ACT-toxin, and AM-toxin, which target susceptible host cultivars by disrupting membrane integrity, chloroplast function, mitochondrial metabolism, and sphingolipid biosynthesis (Tsuge et al., 2013; Meena and Samal, 2019; Wang et al., 2022c). These toxins induce severe physiological disturbances, leading to electrolyte leakage, membrane destabilization, chlorosis, and ultimately programmed cell death that creates nutrient-rich necrotic tissues favorable for fungal colonization (Tsuge et al., 2013; Meena and Samal, 2019; Wang et al., 2022b).

During infection, Alternaria also induces excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radicals within host tissues (Meena and Samal, 2019; Munir et al., 2025). Although ROS are normally produced by plants as part of an early defense response against pathogens, necrotrophic fungi can exploit this oxidative burst to accelerate host cell death and tissue necrosis (Heller and Tudzynski, 2011; Newman and Derbyshire, 2020; Singh et al., 2021). High ROS accumulation promotes lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, DNA damage, and loss of membrane integrity, ultimately resulting in cellular collapse that facilitates fungal expansion into surrounding tissues (Zhang et al., 2020; Nagda and Meena, 2026).

The interaction between Alternaria and host plants is further influenced by the regulation of plant immune signaling pathways (Liu et al., 2021, 2025; Munir et al., 2025). In many plant species, salicylic acid (SA)-mediated defense responses and hypersensitive response (HR)-associated localized cell death are highly effective against biotrophic pathogens but may inadvertently increase susceptibility to necrotrophic fungi such as Alternaria (Brouwer et al., 2020; Mishra et al., 2024). In contrast, jasmonic acid (JA)- and ethylene (ET)-mediated signaling pathways are generally associated with resistance against necrotrophic pathogens because they regulate defense genes involved in antimicrobial compound production, cell wall reinforcement, and detoxification processes (Gupta et al., 2020; Macioszek et al., 2023).

Host plants attempt to restrict Alternaria infection through multiple defense mechanisms, including the production of phytoalexins, antioxidant enzymes, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, and structural barriers such as lignification and callose deposition (Almagro et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2021). Antioxidant enzymes including catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase are activated to reduce oxidative stress caused by ROS accumulation during fungal invasion (Zhang et al., 2022a; Nagda and Meena, 2026). Collectively, Alternaria–host interactions represent a multilevel pathogenic system in which enzymatic penetration, toxin-mediated disruption, ROS-induced damage, immune modulation, and environmental factors act synergistically, with disease outcome ultimately determined by the dynamic interplay between fungal genetic potential, host resistance traits, and external conditions, highlighting the complexity of managing Alternaria diseases in agricultural systems.

3 Overview of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent

Trichoderma is one of the most extensively studied genera of filamentous fungi in biological control. Its prominence is largely due to its taxonomic diversity, ecological plasticity, and functional versatility within agroecosystems (Woo et al., 2023; Kredics et al., 2024; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024). Taxonomically, the genus belongs to the phylum Ascomycota, class Sordariomycetes, order Hypocreales, and family Hypocreaceae. It encompasses a large number of species that are predominantly free-living and fast-growing (Kubiak et al., 2023; Mukhopadhyay and Kumar, 2020). Members of Trichoderma are commonly encountered in soil, plant debris, and plant-associated niches, reflecting their strong saprophytic capacity and competitive fitness in microbially dense environments (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Dutta et al., 2022; Rashmi et al., 2016).

3.1 Taxonomy and diversity

Historically, the taxonomy of Trichoderma was challenging due to the limited resolution of morphological characteristics, as traits such as conidial shape, colony morphology, and conidiophore branching often overlap among species and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions (Surma et al., 2025; Zheng et al., 2021). This limitation frequently led to misidentification and underestimation of species diversity within the genus. The introduction of molecular phylogenetic approaches, particularly multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) based on ITS, TEF1-α, RPB2, and calmodulin genes, has significantly refined Trichoderma taxonomy by resolving cryptic species complexes and improving phylogenetic resolution within the genus (Arias Mota et al., 2025; Dou et al., 2020).

Based on current phylogenetic classification, Trichoderma belongs to the phylum Ascomycota, class Sordariomycetes, order Hypocreales, and family Hypocreaceae, and comprises a highly diverse genus with numerous phylogenetically distinct lineages. Within this framework, species such as T. harzianum, T. asperellum, T. virens, T. atroviride, and T. koningii represent well-characterized clades that are frequently recovered across different ecological niches, indicating substantial intra-genus diversity and ecological adaptability (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2023; Almeida et al., 2022). The clarification of these taxonomic relationships is essential for accurate species delimitation, as genetic differences among lineages are closely associated with ecological distribution, evolutionary divergence, and functional specialization.

3.2 Ecological adaptability

A key feature distinguishing Trichoderma spp. from many other microbial biocontrol agents is their remarkable ecological breadth and adaptability (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025; Cavalcante et al., 2025). These fungi are ubiquitous in natural and agricultural environments, occurring in agricultural soils, forest litter, composts, decaying plant residues, and rhizospheres where they coexist and compete with a wide array of microorganisms (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Dutta et al., 2022; Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2016). Their robust saprophytic lifestyle facilitates the efficient exploitation of organic substrates derived from plant residues. This allows Trichoderma spp. to compete effectively for limited nutrients in densely colonized soil environments and to maintain ecological dominance under competitive conditions (Contreras-Soto et al., 2025; Singh et al., 2024).

Their tolerance to environmental variability further supports the ecological success of Trichoderma spp. (Cavalcante et al., 2025). For example, Cavalcante et al. (2025) demonstrated that Trichoderma isolates can sustain growth across a pH range of 5 to 9 and exhibit substantial developmental plasticity beyond standard laboratory temperature regimes when adequate moisture is available. Furthermore, heat-treated strains of T. harzianum have been shown to remain viable under extreme pH conditions ranging from 3 to 12 and temperatures up to 45 °C, underscoring physiological adaptations that enable functionality under dynamic environmental conditions (Ahmed et al., 2025). This adaptability allows Trichoderma populations to survive agricultural disturbances such as tillage, irrigation, and fertilizer applications.

3.3 Colonization and persistence

Successful biological control depends not only on the antagonistic potential of a biocontrol agent but also on its ability to colonize and persist in plant-associated niches under diverse conditions (Riseh et al., 2025; Villavicencio-Vásquez et al., 2025). Additionally, Trichoderma spp. exhibit exceptional competence as root colonizers by establishing themselves in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane, where chemotropic responses to root exudates drive directed hyphal growth toward root surfaces and rapid proliferation along epidermal tissues (Taylor et al., 2022; Moreno-Ruiz et al., 2020). Through rapidly establishing strong associations within the rhizosphere and at potential pathogen entry points, Trichoderma spp. Promote early suppression of invading pathogens through niche occupation and competitive exclusion (Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2016; Dutta et al., 2023). This effective colonization strategy further restricts the availability of nutrients and physical space required for pathogen germination and establishment, thereby reducing the likelihood of successful Alternaria infection in plant tissues.

Root colonization typically persists throughout the growing season, maintaining interactions with both the host plant and the rhizosphere microbiota to enhance antagonistic activity and plant defense (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Stummer et al., 2024). Certain strains can also colonize aboveground tissues, including leaves and stems, particularly following foliar application. This expands their functional range and reinforces their role in integrated disease management for horticultural crops (Şesan et al., 2020; Csótó et al., 2024). The persistence of Trichoderma populations is further supported by their ability to adapt to fluctuating rhizosphere conditions, interact dynamically with resident microbial communities, and maintain metabolic activity under environmental stress (Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2016; Shahriar et al., 2022; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024). In some cases, Trichoderma spp. are also capable of forming biofilm-like structures on root surfaces, which improve adhesion, ecological stability, and long-term persistence in plant-associated environments (Triveni et al., 2013; Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2016; Taylor et al., 2022).

Sustained colonization is particularly important for effective suppression of Alternaria spp., as prolonged occupancy of plant-associated niches enables continuous antagonistic activity and early interception of invading pathogens before extensive infection can occur (Mukherjee et al., 2012; Coppola et al., 2019; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022). Moreover, persistent interactions between Trichoderma, the host plant, and the surrounding microbiota contribute to the maintenance of plant defense readiness and overall ecological competitiveness within the rhizosphere (Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Dutta et al., 2023);. These characteristics highlight that successful biocontrol is not solely dependent on direct antagonism, but also on the capacity of Trichoderma spp. to establish stable and resilient populations under field conditions, thereby supporting more consistent and durable disease management outcomes.

4 Mechanisms of action of Trichoderma against Alternaria

Mycoparasitism is one of the best-characterized direct antagonistic mechanisms used by Trichoderma spp. against Alternaria spp (Philip et al., 2024; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Nazla et al., 2026). Among the diverse antagonistic strategies employed by Trichoderma spp., including antibiosis through secondary metabolite and volatile organic compound production, competition for nutrients and ecological niches, and induction of plant systemic resistance, mycoparasitism is the most extensively studied mechanism at the molecular and cellular levels (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Kredics et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025). This process involves an active biological interaction in which Trichoderma spp. detect, physically engage, and degrade the pathogen’s hyphal structures through the secretion of hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases, glucanases, and proteases that break down structural components of the pathogen cell wall (Dutta et al., 2023; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Algifari et al., 2025). Unlike indirect suppression mechanisms, mycoparasitism requires direct physical contact between the biocontrol agent and the target pathogen (Stange et al., 2024a). Consequently, its effectiveness is strongly influenced by strain compatibility, environmental conditions, and spatial distribution within the plant–soil system (Smolińska and Kowalska, 2018; Rahman et al., 2024; El-Sheikh and Shahein, 2025).

In practice, these mechanisms rarely operate in isolation, as individual Trichoderma strains may suppress Alternaria pathogens through a combination of direct antagonism, metabolite production, resource competition, and host defense activation. Representative examples of these strain-specific interactions are summarized in Table 1, providing a concise overview of the main biocontrol mechanisms, target Alternaria species, host pathosystems, and reported mechanistic evidence.

Table 1. Representative examples of Trichoderma species/strains suppressing Alternaria pathogens through different biocontrol mechanisms.

Main biocontrol mechanismsTarget Alternaria speciesHost plants/diseasesTrichoderma species/strainsSpecific evidence/key findingsReferences
MycoparasitismAlternaria sp.Horticultural crop/leaf spot or blightT. citrinoviride• Caused hyphal deformation and cell wall degradation in Alternaria sp.• Inhibited radial growth by 57.14%; metabolites provided additional inhibition.• Activated MAPK signaling and CWDE-related genes before direct contact.Al-Mekhlafi et al. (2025); Abbas et al. (2022); Stange et al. (2024b)
Antibiosis/secondary metabolitesA. alternataTomato/leaf spot disease; postharvest pear/black spot diseaseT. afroharzianum TRI07; T. asperellum 2-X-3-3; T. hamatum Ham34• CWDEs, VOCs, and hyphal interactions disrupted pathogen growth and structure.• VOCs from T. asperellum inhibited growth by 74.4% and suppressed sporulation.• Peptaibols induced membrane leakage and fungal death.Philip et al. (2024); Wu et al. (2025); Bjørk et al. (2022)
Competition for space and nutrientsA. porriHorticultural crops; onion/purple blotchT. asperellum ORF 2• Rapid colonization and nutrient competition reduced pathogen growth.• Siderophore-mediated iron sequestration limited nutrient availability for Alternaria.• SEM showed hyphal intertwining and conidial damage.Yao et al. (2023); Awal et al. (2025); Tyśkiewicz et al. (2022); Saini et al. (2025)
Induced systemic resistance (ISR)A. rassicicolaTomato or other horticultural crops; Arabidopsis/black leaf spotT. atroviride ATCC 20476• Activated JA/ET-related defenses and PR proteins.• Primed faster plant immune responses against Alternaria.• ISR involved Trichoderma-specific genes and additional SA-related signaling pathways.Islam et al. (2023); Charpe et al. (2025); Sakai et al. (2024); Roychowdhury et al. (2024)
Plant growth promotion/stress resilienceAlternaria spp.; A. alternataHorticultural crops; lettuce/leaf spot diseaseT. asperellum• Improved root growth, nutrient uptake, antioxidant activity, and stress tolerance.• Reduced oxidative stress and host susceptibility to Alternaria infection.• Genomic and metabolomic approaches are being used to improve biocontrol traits.Chen et al. (2025); Basak et al. (2026); Metwally et al. (2026); Raju and Punamalai (2025)

4.1 Recognition and chemotropic growth

The initiation of mycoparasitism relies on Trichoderma’s capacity to perceive chemical and physical signals from prey fungi, such as Alternaria, which induce enzyme production and gene expression even before direct physical interaction occurs (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2023; Stange et al., 2024a). Diffusible molecules released from Alternaria, including cell wall fragments and low-molecular-weight metabolites, act as signals that stimulate the chemotropic growth of Trichoderma spp. toward the pathogen (Stange et al., 2024b). This directional growth enables Trichoderma spp. to locate their fungal host efficiently in competitive microbial environments (Stange et al., 2024a).

Moreno-Ruiz et al. (2020) demonstrated that T. atroviride can sense prey-derived diffusible compounds in fungal culture supernatants and respond through chemotropically guided hyphal growth. However, this recognition process is not uniform, as variability among Alternaria species and strain-specific sensing mechanisms in Trichoderma spp. result in differential antagonistic responses. At the molecular level, this recognition is mediated by surface-localized receptors that perceive extracellular cues (Abbas et al., 2022). Functional studies have shown that G-protein-coupled receptors, such as Gpr1, play central roles in sensing prey-derived signals and activating downstream signaling cascades associated with mycoparasitism (Omann et al., 2012; Abbas et al., 2022).

Upon activation, these pathways trigger regulatory networks involving mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades and calcium-dependent signaling (Atanasova et al., 2023). These networks coordinate the upregulation of genes encoding the cell wall–degrading enzymes, secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways, and adhesion proteins (Vieira et al., 2013; Steindorff et al., 2014; Manzar et al., 2022). Philip et al. (2024) provided evidence that metabolites produced by T. afroharzianum TRI07 effectively inhibit the growth of A. alternata, confirming that these molecular mechanisms translate into tangible antagonistic activity.

4.2 Physical contact and hyphal coiling

Upon physical contact, Trichoderma spp. hyphae frequently coil around Alternaria hyphae, representing a morphological hallmark of mycoparasitism (Mukherjee et al., 2012; Mukhopadhyay and Kumar, 2020). This hallmark reflects coordinated recognition, attachment, and preparation for penetration driven by underlying signaling and enzymatic responses (Mukherjee et al., 2012; Mukhopadhyay and Kumar, 2020; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2023). Hyphal coiling likely enhances adhesion and stabilizes the host–parasite interaction, promoting the formation of a confined interface that enables the targeted secretion of enzymes (Sood et al., 2020; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022).

Following adhesion, Trichoderma spp. develop penetration structures that facilitate the breaching of the Alternaria cell wall (Dutta et al., 2023; Santillan-Culquimboz et al., 2025). The efficiency of this penetration is strongly influenced by the structural and compositional features of the Alternaria cell wall, which vary among species such as A. alternata and A. solani (Fernandes et al., 2021; Ost et al., 2025). Although the core polysaccharide skeleton is conserved, the arrangement of beta-glucans, chitin, and glycoproteins varies, resulting in differences in mechanical rigidity (Hasim and Coleman, 2019; Zhao et al., 2023). Such structural variability helps explain the frequent discrepancy between strong in vitro antagonism and inconsistent disease suppression observed under field conditions (Whitaker and Bakker, 2019; Clough et al., 2022). However, the effectiveness of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent is also influenced by multiple interacting factors, including environmental conditions, soil microbial interactions, and the ability of the fungus to establish and persist within plant-associated niches (Yao et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2025).

4.3 Enzymatic degradation and cellular collapse

The biochemical foundation of mycoparasitism lies in the production of lytic enzymes (Asad et al., 2015; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Jefferson et al., 2026a). Chitinases hydrolyze chitin polymers, while glucanases target the glucan components that confer mechanical strength to the cell wall (Zhang et al., 2024a). Proteases further contribute by degrading structural proteins and facilitating membrane disruption (Deng et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2019; Abbas et al., 2022). As summarized in Table 2, CWDEs constitute important virulence factors in several Alternaria species, further emphasizing the significance of enzymatic degradation during Trichoderma-mediated antagonistic interactions.

Table 2. Overview of major Alternaria species, their host plants, disease symptoms, key toxins or secondary metabolites, and principal virulence factors.

Alternaria speciesMajor host plantsDisease symptomsMajor toxins/secondary metabolitesKey virulence factorsReferences
A. AlternataTomato, citrus, and various horticultural cropsLeaf spot; brown necrotic lesions with concentric rings, chlorotic halo, lesion coalescence, defoliationAlternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), tenuazonic acidCWDEs, host-specific toxins (HSTs), non-host-specific toxins (nHSTs)Abdessemed et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021; Fonseca-Guerra et al., 2023; Balodi et al., 2024; Ebadi and Ebadi, 2024
A. solaniPotato, tomato (Solanaceous crops)Early blight; necrotic leaf lesions with concentric rings; lesion expansion and coalescence causing severe foliar damageAlternaric acid, tenuazonic acid (TeA), alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME)CWDEs, phytotoxins, necrotrophic infection strategy, enzymatic penetrationXu et al., 2021; Fernandes et al., 2023; Ghalib et al., 2025; Schmey et al., 2024
A. brassicicolaBrassica crops, Horseradish (and other crops)Leaf spot diseases; small black lesions with chlorotic halo, enlarging into concentric (target-like) spots, shot-hole symptomsBrassicicolin A, tenuazonic acid (TeA), tentoxinCWDEs, phytotoxins, host-specific toxins (HSTs), necrotrophic infectionOka et al., 2005; Munir et al., 2020; Blagojević et al., 2020; Fernandes et al., 2023; Yessimseitova et al., 2025
A. tenuissimaPepper, eggplant, various horticultural cropsLeaf spot; small brown necrotic spots, enlarging lesions, concentric rings (variable), coalescence, leaf senescenceAlternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), altenuene, tenuazonic acidMycotoxin production, CWDEs, necrotrophic strategyLi et al., 2011; Habib et al., 2021; Lan et al., 2023; Fernandes et al., 2023; Daichi et al., 2025

Enzyme production is often inducible and is enhanced upon contact with Alternaria, reflecting an adaptive and energy-efficient strategy (Zeilinger and Omann, 2007; Rao et al., 2016). Variations in enzyme expression profiles among species and strains are linked to differences in biocontrol efficacy, highlighting the importance of precise strain selection (Saravanakumar et al., 2017; Garcés-Moncayo et al., 2025; Jefferson et al., 2026c). Moreover, environmental factors such as pH and nutrient availability can modulate enzyme activity (Kredics et al., 2004; Bao et al., 2024).

The combined effects of hyphal penetration and enzymatic degradation cause severe structural damage to Alternaria spp (Sood et al., 2020; Mukherjee et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2023). Microscopic analyses consistently demonstrate cell wall disintegration, cytoplasmic shrinkage, hyphal deformation, and eventual cellular collapse (Sood et al., 2020; Al-Mekhlafi et al., 2025). Al-Mekhlafi et al. (2025) provided representative microscopic evidence of these sequential stages, confirming the total degradation of pathogen hyphae during these antagonistic interactions.

4.4 Microscopic and quantitative evidence of antagonism

Al-Mekhlafi et al. (2025) reported microscopic evidence confirming the strong mycoparasitic capacity of T. citrinoviride against Alternaria sp., as indicated by hyphal deformation, cell wall degradation, and cytoplasmic disintegration, as shown in Figure 2. These observations are consistent with mycoparasitic interactions involving direct hyphal contact (Dutta et al., 2023; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022) and the enzymatic degradation of pathogen cell walls mediated by hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and glucanases (Algifari et al., 2025). Furthermore, T. citrinoviride inhibited the radial growth of Alternaria sp. by 57.14% in dual culture, while non-volatile and volatile metabolites contributed to additional inhibition of 48.21% and 36.36%, respectively (Al-Mekhlafi et al., 2025). Collectively, these findings indicate that antagonistic activity involves both direct interaction and metabolite-mediated effects.

Overview of the infection cycle and mechanisms of *Alternaria* in horticultural crops, including conidial germination, appressorium-mediated penetration, tissue colonization, sporulation, lesion formation, and survival through overwintering structures.
Figure 2. Overview of the infection cycle and mechanisms of Alternaria in horticultural crops, including conidial germination, appressorium-mediated penetration, tissue colonization, sporulation, lesion formation, and survival through overwintering structures.

While mycoparasitism represents a potent mechanism under laboratory conditions, its efficacy in field settings is often limited by environmental heterogeneity, microbial competition, and physical separation between organisms (Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). Consequently, reliance on contact-dependent suppression alone may not provide stable disease control (Nguyen et al., 2025; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). Integrating mycoparasitism with antibiosis and induced systemic resistance is therefore essential for enhancing durability and ecological resilience in biocontrol systems.

4.5 Antibiosis and secondary metabolites

In addition to contact-dependent mycoparasitism, Trichoderma spp. exert antibiosis through the production of diverse secondary metabolites that inhibit pathogen growth (Guo et al., 2023; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). These compounds include peptaibols, polyketides, terpenoids, gliotoxin, viridin, harzianolide, and 6-pentyl-α-pyrone (6-PP), many of which exhibit broad-spectrum antifungal activity (Flatschacher et al., 2025; Armenova et al., 2026). Unlike mechanical parasitism, antibiosis does not require direct hyphal contact, thereby extending the spatial and temporal scope of pathogen suppression (Arseneault and Filion, 2017).

Mechanistically, these metabolites interfere with fungal physiology at multiple levels, including membrane permeabilization, disruption of mitochondrial respiration, oxidative imbalance, and inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis (Khan et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). Peptaibols, for instance, integrate into lipid bilayers to form ion channels, leading to cytoplasmic leakage, membrane depolarization, and eventual cell death (Zhang et al., 2022b; Bjørk et al., 2022). In contrast, several polyketides- and terpene-derived metabolites perturb intracellular redox homeostasis and interfere with signaling networks, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired morphogenesis (Elhamouly et al., 2022; Wadhwa et al., 2024; Angeles Flores et al., 2026). Collectively, these multifaceted modes of action underscore the capacity of Trichoderma-derived metabolites to exert systemic physiological disruption rather than localized damage.

In Alternaria, where pathogenicity depends on sustained hyphal expansion and regulated toxin biosynthesis, metabolic disruption likely compromises both vegetative growth and virulence factor production (Meena et al., 2017; You et al., 2023). Restricted ATP generation and precursor availability may impair signaling pathways that regulate secondary metabolite biosynthesis (Li et al., 2024a). Although species-specific metabolomic profiling of Alternaria–Trichoderma interactions remains limited, the conservation of central carbon metabolism and oxidative stress responses across filamentous fungi suggests a broad susceptibility to these bioactive compounds (Hong et al., 2013; Nielsen et al., 2019; Yaakoub et al., 2022).

4.6 Volatile and non-volatile inhibitory compounds

Antibiosis in Trichoderma spp. involves both diffusible (non-volatile) metabolites and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), each contributing to ecological fitness and pathogen suppression (Joo and Hussein, 2022; Chávez-Avilés et al., 2024). Non-volatile metabolites accumulate in the rhizosphere or infection microenvironment, where they exert concentration-dependent inhibitory effects on neighboring pathogens (Li et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2023). In contrast, VOCs such as 6-PP and various sesquiterpenes can diffuse through air-filled soil pores, enabling inhibition without physical proximity (Gualtieri et al., 2022; Jiménez-Bremont et al., 2024).

The ecological significance of VOC-mediated inhibition depends on its capacity to overcome spatial constraints that may limit direct mycoparasitic contact (Morath et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2019; Stange et al., 2024b). In heterogeneous soil systems where microbial distribution is patchy, volatile-mediated signaling and inhibition may represent a more reliable suppression mechanism than contact-dependent interactions alone (Garbeva et al., 2014; Schulz-Bohm et al., 2015; Effmert et al., 2012). Moreover, VOCs have been reported to modulate fungal gene expression, including genes associated with sporulation and stress response, further amplifying their suppressive effects (Li et al., 2024a; Li et al., 2024b; Abdenaceur et al., 2024).

The antifungal activity of Trichoderma-derived metabolites is reflected in a range of physiological and structural alterations in target pathogens (Prapagdee et al., 2008; Inayati et al., 2019; Halo et al., 2018). Exposure to these compounds results in reduced mycelial growth, accompanied by morphological abnormalities such as hyphal swelling, distortion, and irregular branching (Prapagdee et al., 2008; Moya et al., 2018; Karličić et al., 2021). In addition, a marked decrease in conidial germination is commonly observed, indicating that both vegetative development and early infection stages are highly susceptible to metabolite-mediated inhibition (Rahnama et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2026).

At the cellular level, these effects are associated with significant disruptions in fungal integrity and metabolic balance (Saadaoui et al., 2023; Philip et al., 2024). Philip et al. (2024) demonstrated that antifungal metabolites produced by T. afroharzianum disrupt the structural integrity of A. alternata through the production of cell wall–degrading enzymes (e.g., chitinases and glucanases) and toxic volatile organic compounds, as well as through direct hyphal interactions such as coiling and penetration, ultimately inhibiting fungal growth and impairing normal physiological functions. Such alterations suggest that the inhibitory effects extend beyond surface-level structural damage, potentially interfering with essential cellular processes and contributing to the observed suppression of fungal growth and development (Khan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2024b).

4.7 Competition for space and nutrients

Trichoderma spp. effectively suppress pathogens through competition for space (Yao et al., 2023; Awal et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). As demonstrated by Awal et al. (2025), where T. yunnanense TM10 inhibited pathogen growth via spatial competition. Their fast growth rate, high reproductive capacity, and adaptability to diverse environmental conditions enable them to occupy available niches more efficiently than many phytopathogenic fungi, including Alternaria (Halifu et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2023). This rapid colonization physically restricts pathogen access to infection sites and establishes an early competitive advantage, reducing the likelihood of successful pathogen adhesion.

Beyond spatial dominance, Trichoderma spp. actively compete for essential nutrients, particularly carbon, nitrogen, and micronutrients (Pozo et al., 2024; Villavicencio-Vásquez et al., 2025; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024). Through efficient uptake systems and metabolic versatility, Trichoderma spp. can utilize a wide range of organic substrates, allowing them to thrive even under nutrient-limited conditions (Zin and Badaluddin, 2020; Santillan-Culquimboz et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). This competitive nutrient acquisition deprives Alternaria of the critical resources necessary for spore germination, hyphal elongation, and colonization, thereby suppressing their growth and pathogenic potential.

Among micronutrients, iron plays a significant role in microbial competition. It is essential for various cellular processes but is often limited in bioavailable forms in the environment (Manzar et al., 2022; Cui et al., 2025; Santillan-Culquimboz et al., 2025). Trichoderma spp. produce siderophores, which are low molecular weight iron-chelating compounds that efficiently sequester iron (Moropana et al., 2024; Cui et al., 2025). Through binding iron with high affinity, siderophores reduce its availability to competing pathogens, effectively creating iron-depleted conditions that inhibit pathogen metabolism and growth. (Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Cui et al., 2025). This mechanism not only enhances the competitive fitness of Trichoderma spp. but also contributes significantly to their biocontrol efficacy against fungal pathogens such as Alternaria (Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2020; Cui et al., 2025). Collectively, the combined effects of rapid colonization, efficient nutrient acquisition, and siderophore-mediated iron competition highlight the importance of resource competition as a key mechanism in Trichoderma-mediated biocontrol.

4.8 Induced systemic resistance and plant defense

Trichoderma spp. enhance plant defense through indirect strategies, particularly by inducing systemic resistance (ISR) (Islam et al., 2023; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Basak et al., 2026). Following root colonization, Trichoderma spp. interact with plant cells to activate key defense signaling pathways. These are primarily mediated by jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET), which are commonly associated with resistance against necrotrophic pathogens (Shoresh et al., 2005; Islam et al., 2023; Jung et al., 2024). Rather than causing strong stress responses, this interaction primes the plant immune system, enabling a faster and more effective defense upon subsequent pathogen attack (Islam et al., 2023; Hönig et al., 2023; Jung et al., 2024).

At the molecular level, Trichoderma spp. release elicitor molecules, including small, secreted proteins, secondary metabolites, and cell wall–derived fragments, which are recognized by plant receptors (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Pereira et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2025). This recognition triggers a cascade of intracellular signaling events that activate systemic defense throughout the plant (Charpe et al., 2025). Consequently, plants exhibit an enhanced defensive state even in tissues distant from the initial colonization site, highlighting the importance of ISR in Trichoderma-mediated biocontrol.

This activation is closely linked to the transcriptional reprogramming of plant cells (Aerts et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2022). In response to Trichoderma spp. colonization, a wide range of defense-related genes are upregulated, including those encoding pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, and other antimicrobial enzymes (Intana et al., 2022; Aamir et al., 2023; Shanmugaraj et al., 2024). These proteins play a direct role in degrading fungal cell walls and limiting pathogen establishment (Ribeiro et al., 2019; Safeer et al., 2025; Kumari et al., 2025). Trichoderma-induced priming ensures that these defense genes are expressed more rapidly and at higher levels upon pathogen challenge (Shanmugaraj et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025; Basak et al., 2026). This allows plants to maintain a balance between growth and defense, avoiding unnecessary energy expenditure under non-stress conditions (Jatana et al., 2024; Basak et al., 2026; Dong and Ahammed, 2026). As a result, plants become more resistant to a broad spectrum of pathogens, including fungi such as Alternaria spp., as reported by Charpe et al. (2025), where microbial-mediated induced resistance enhances plant defense capacity and primes plants for “stronger and faster defense responses,” ultimately inhibiting pathogen growth and spore germination and rendering Alternaria spp. particularly sensitive to enhanced host defense responses.

4.9 Plant growth promotion and stress resilience

In parallel with defense induction, Trichoderma spp. significantly contribute to plant growth promotion by enhancing physiological performance and growth parameters such as root development and biomass accumulation (Doni et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2025; Jefferson et al., 2026a). Root colonization stimulates architecture development, enhances nutrient uptake efficiency, and improves overall plant vigor (Doni et al., 2014; Sood et al., 2020; Akbari et al., 2024). These effects are often associated with the production of growth-regulating compounds, including auxin-like phytohormones, as well as enhanced nutrient mobilization and availability in the rhizosphere (Fiorentino et al., 2018; Andrzejak and Janowska, 2022; Wang et al., 2024). In the context of Alternaria management, improved root architecture and enhanced nutrient status enable plants to mount faster and more robust defense responses upon pathogen challenge, as higher physiological vigor directly strengthens both constitutive and inducible resistance mechanisms (Gholizadeh Vazvani et al., 2026).

Under stress conditions, the presence of Trichoderma further enhances plant resilience by modulating biochemical responses (Zhang et al., 2016; Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2024; Geng et al., 2025). Plants treated with Trichoderma frequently exhibit improved tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and oxidative stress, alongside increased resistance to infection (Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2024; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025). This is particularly relevant in the context of Alternaria pathogenesis, as abiotic stress conditions are well-documented to predispose host plants to Alternaria infection by compromising cell wall integrity, suppressing antioxidant capacity, and downregulating defense-related gene expression (Kissoudis et al., 2014; Munir et al., 2025). Trichoderma-mediated stress priming therefore reduces host vulnerability by maintaining basal defense competence even under unfavorable environmental conditions, effectively narrowing the physiological window of susceptibility exploited by Alternaria spp. during infection (Pacheco-Trejo et al., 2022; Aamir et al., 2023; Basak et al., 2026). This dual functionality highlights the role of Trichoderma as an effective and sustainable agent not only in general plant health management, but specifically in reducing host susceptibility to Alternaria-associated diseases.

5 Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma in horticultural crops

5.1 In vitro evidence

Dual culture assays are among the most widely used and fundamental experimental approaches for evaluating the antagonistic potential of Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogenic fungi such as Alternaria spp (Naglot et al., 2015; Olowe et al., 2022; Nysanth et al., 2022). Under controlled laboratory conditions, this method enables direct observation of fungal–fungal interactions, including growth inhibition, spatial competition, and morphological responses at the interface of interaction (Nysanth et al., 2022; Dourou and La Porta, 2023; Ren et al., 2025). Typically, Trichoderma and the target pathogen are co-cultured on the same agar medium, allowing for the quantitative assessment of radial growth inhibition as well as the qualitative characterization of interaction dynamics (Stracquadanio et al., 2020; Go et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2025).

Numerous studies have demonstrated that Trichoderma spp. significantly inhibit the mycelial growth of Alternaria spp. in dual culture systems, often resulting in substantial reductions in colony expansion and competitive exclusion of the pathogen (Arzanlou et al., 2014; Yassin et al., 2022; Philip et al., 2024). For example, Yassin et al. (2022) demonstrated through dual culture assays that T. viride and T. harzianum significantly suppressed the growth of A. alternata, achieving inhibition levels of 75.04% and 67.83%, respectively, thereby demonstrating their strong antagonistic potential under in vitro conditions. Such inhibitory effects are typically quantified using the percentage inhibition of radial growth (PIRG), which is a widely adopted metric that enables standardized comparison of antagonistic performance across different strains and experimental conditions (Stracquadanio et al., 2020). In many cases, highly effective Trichoderma isolates are capable of rapidly colonizing the culture medium, overgrowing Alternaria colonies, and establishing physical dominance within a short incubation period (Abo-Elyousr et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2025; Al-Mekhlafi et al., 2025).

The effectiveness of Trichoderma spp. in dual culture systems is closely linked to strain-specific traits, including growth rate, enzyme production capacity, and secondary metabolite profiles (Kumari et al., 2024; Garcés-Moncayo et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2025). Accordingly, certain strains, particularly T. harzianum and T. asperellum, consistently exhibit strong antagonistic performance, achieving high levels of pathogen suppression under laboratory conditions, with inhibition frequently exceeding 70% depending on the strain and pathogen (Kuzmanovska et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2025; Atlagić et al., 2025). However, significant variability in inhibition efficiency among strains highlights the critical importance of isolate selection during biocontrol development (Yendyo et al., 2017; Kumari et al., 2024).

Despite their widespread use, dual culture assays have inherent limitations that must be considered when interpreting results (Liu et al., 2022; Kumari et al., 2024; Alsalmo et al., 2026). Laboratory conditions provide a simplified and homogeneous environment that does not fully reflect the complexity of soil ecosystems, plant–microbe interactions, or environmental variability encountered under field conditions (Moënne-Loccoz et al., 2014; Bardin et al., 2015). Consequently, strong in vitro antagonism does not always translate into consistent disease suppression in planta or under field conditions. This discrepancy underscores the need to integrate dual culture findings with greenhouse and field-based evaluations to achieve a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of biocontrol potential.

5.2 Greenhouse studies

Greenhouse experiments serve as an essential intermediate step between in vitro assays and field applications. They provide a semi-controlled environment that accurately reflects plant–microbe interactions while maintaining experimental reproducibility (Forero et al., 2019; Aznar-Sánchez et al., 2020; Slimani et al., 2023). Under these conditions, numerous studies have demonstrated that Trichoderma spp. significantly reduce the disease severity caused by Alternaria spp. across a range of horticultural crops (Khalil et al., 2021; Imran et al., 2023; Sharma et al., 2024). This disease suppression is typically associated with both direct antagonistic activity in the rhizosphere and the activation of plant defense mechanisms, particularly induced systemic resistance (Dutta et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2023; Kaman et al., 2024). Plants treated with Trichoderma often exhibit reduced lesion size, delayed symptom development, and lower disease incidence compared to untreated controls, indicating the effective suppression of pathogen establishment and progression (Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Mishu et al., 2025; Herrera-Rodriguez et al., 2026).

In addition to disease control, greenhouse studies consistently report the positive effects of Trichoderma spp. on plant growth parameters (Imran et al., 2023; Dutta et al., 2024; Philip et al., 2024). Notable improvements include enhanced root and shoot biomass, increased plant height, expanded leaf area, and greater chlorophyll content (Ban et al., 2018; Dutta et al., 2024; Philip et al., 2024). Such growth promotion is closely linked to improved nutrient uptake, the production of phytohormones like auxin-like compounds, and the modulation of plant physiological processes (Andrzejak and Janowska, 2022; Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2025). Importantly, the dual role of Trichoderma as both a biocontrol agent and a plant growth–promoting fungus highlights its potential to simultaneously enhance plant health and productivity under controlled yet biologically relevant conditions (Andrzejak and Janowska, 2022; Imran et al., 2023; Dutta et al., 2024).

5.3 Field applications

Field applications provide the most realistic evaluation of Trichoderma-based biocontrol strategies because they incorporate the full complexity of environmental variability, soil heterogeneity, and microbial interactions (Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). Several case studies in horticultural crops have demonstrated that Trichoderma spp. can effectively reduce the disease incidence caused by Alternaria spp., although the magnitude of suppression is often more variable than under controlled conditions (Metz and Hausladen, 2022; Imran et al., 2022, 2023). Successful field applications are generally associated with proper strain selection, appropriate formulation, and optimal timing of application. All of these factors influence colonization efficiency and persistence in the soil or on plant surfaces (dela Cruz et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2025; Villavicencio-Vásquez et al., 2025; Jefferson et al., 2026c).

Beyond disease suppression, field studies frequently report improvements in crop yield and quality following Trichoderma application (Dutta et al., 2024; García-Latorre et al., 2025; Herrera-Rodriguez et al., 2026). These benefits are attributed not only to reduced pathogen pressure but also to enhanced plant vigor and improved tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. These advantages are mediated by Trichoderma interactions with host plants (Awad-Allah et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2025; Geng et al., 2025). Yield increases are often accompanied by improved fruit size, uniformity, and marketability, which are critical parameters in horticultural production systems (Vultaggio et al., 2024; García-Latorre et al., 2025). However, variability in field performance remains a common observation, reflecting the influence of environmental and ecological factors that are absent in laboratory and greenhouse studies.

5.4 Factors influencing the efficacy of Trichoderma

The effectiveness of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent is influenced by multiple interacting factors that determine its establishment, persistence, and functional activity in agroecosystems. These include environmental conditions, soil microbial interactions, and the ability of the fungus to colonize plant roots (Yao et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2025). Among these, environmental conditions such as temperature, soil moisture, pH, and nutrient availability play a critical role in shaping both Trichoderma performance and pathogen dynamics (Daryaei et al., 2016; Cavalcante et al., 2025; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025). Variations in these factors can significantly affect fungal growth, enzyme activity, and metabolite production, ultimately influencing disease suppression outcomes (Cortez-Lázaro et al., 2025; Algifari et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026).

Strain specificity is another key determinant of efficacy because different Trichoderma isolates exhibit distinct physiological traits, antagonistic capacities, and ecological adaptability (Jambhulkar et al., 2024; Baek et al., 2025; Garcés-Moncayo et al., 2025). These differences underscore the importance of selecting well-adapted and functionally efficient strains for specific crops and environments (Jambhulkar et al., 2024; Baek et al., 2025; Garcés-Moncayo et al., 2025). In addition, formulation and delivery methods, such as seed treatment, soil application, or foliar sprays, strongly influence the success of biocontrol by affecting the survival, distribution, and colonization of the biocontrol agent (Martinez et al., 2023; Vindas-Reyes et al., 2024).

Interactions with indigenous microbiota further complicate the performance of Trichoderma spp. under field conditions. Their efficacy can depend on interactions with the surrounding soil microbiome and associated microbial communities (Yao et al., 2023; Shao et al., 2025; Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2024). Native microbial communities can either enhance or suppress the activity of introduced strains through competition, synergism, or niche exclusion (Yao et al., 2023; Shao et al., 2025). Consequently, the outcome of biocontrol applications depends not only on the intrinsic properties of Trichoderma spp. but also on the broader ecological context in which they are deployed.

6 Challenges and limitations

Despite its promising potential, the application of Trichoderma in horticultural systems faces several challenges that limit its consistent performance (Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Llanos-Gómez et al., 2026). One of the primary constraints is the variability of field efficacy, as environmental fluctuations and complex microbial interactions can lead to inconsistent disease suppression compared to controlled conditions (Bandara and Kang, 2024; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025). This limitation is particularly evident in mycoparasitism, which, although highly effective under laboratory conditions, often shows reduced efficacy in field environments due to environmental heterogeneity, microbial competition, and physical separation between organisms (Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). As a result, reliance solely on contact-dependent suppression mechanisms may not ensure stable and consistent disease control under diverse agricultural conditions (Nguyen et al., 2025; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Ávila-Oviedo and Chávez-Avilés, 2026). Therefore, integrating mycoparasitism with complementary mechanisms such as antibiosis and induced systemic resistance is considered essential for improving the durability, consistency, and ecological resilience of Trichoderma-based biocontrol systems, particularly across different environmental conditions and growing seasons.

Another major limitation concerns formulation stability and shelf-life, as maintaining the viability and biological activity of Trichoderma spp. during storage and field application remains challenging, particularly under suboptimal environmental conditions (Rimkus et al., 2023; Løvschall et al., 2024; Arias-Chavarría et al., 2025). Furthermore, regulatory and commercialization constraints, including complex registration procedures, strict quality control requirements, and challenges related to large-scale production, may hinder the wider adoption of Trichoderma-based biocontrol products (Chen et al., 2025; Rezaee Danesh et al., 2025). Potential non-target effects also warrant careful consideration, as the introduction of microbial biocontrol agents may influence indigenous microbial communities or alter ecological interactions within the soil microbiome (Shahriar et al., 2022; Alukumbura et al., 2022; Jaramillo-López et al., 2024; Jefferson et al., 2026c). Although Trichoderma spp. are generally regarded as environmentally safe, the long-term ecological consequences of their large-scale application remain insufficiently understood, highlighting the need for further investigation to ensure environmental sustainability, as illustrated in Figure 3 (Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2025; Moussa and Iasur Kruh, 2025; Win et al., 2026).

Summary of the potentials and drawbacks of *Trichoderma* in managing *Alternaria*-caused diseases in horticultural crops.
Figure 3. Summary of the potentials and drawbacks of Trichoderma in managing Alternaria-caused diseases in horticultural crops.

7 Future perspectives

Recent advances in genomic and metabolomic technologies are opening new opportunities to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying Trichoderma-mediated biocontrol. High-throughput sequencing and functional genomics enable the identification of specific genes and metabolic pathways involved in antagonism, plant interaction, and stress tolerance. These tools provide valuable insights for future strain selection and improvement (Zhang et al., 2025; Sun et al., 2025; Vargas-Gasca et al., 2026). Furthermore, molecular approaches such as gene-editing technologies, including CRISPR/Cas systems, offer promising strategies for developing improved Trichoderma strains with enhanced biocontrol efficacy and superior environmental adaptability (Wang et al., 2022c; Zhang et al., 2024c).

Another promising direction is the application of multi-strain consortia to enhance the stability and effectiveness of biological control (Joshi et al., 2023; Nunes et al., 2024; Kredics et al., 2024). The combination of different beneficial microorganisms can promote synergistic interactions that enhance disease suppression and broaden the spectrum of activity across diverse environmental conditions (Minchev et al., 2021; Nunes et al., 2024; Kredics et al., 2024). This approach addresses the limitations of single-strain applications by creating more robust microbial communities capable of withstanding ecological fluctuations.

In the long term, integrating Trichoderma into sustainable horticultural disease management systems remains a primary goal. When combined with cultural practices, the use of resistant cultivars, and a reduced reliance on chemical inputs, Trichoderma-based strategies may support the development of more resilient and environmentally sustainable crop protection frameworks (Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., 2025; Yao et al., 2023). Future research should prioritize the transition from laboratory models to large-scale, integrated field systems to ensure that the potential of these beneficial fungi is fully realized in global horticultural production.

8 Conclusion

This review synthesizes current knowledge regarding the biological characteristics and antagonistic mechanisms of Trichoderma spp. in the management of Alternaria-associated diseases in horticultural crops. Evidence from laboratory, greenhouse, and field studies consistently demonstrates that Trichoderma spp. employ multiple complementary modes of action. These include mycoparasitism, antibiosis, nutrient and spatial competition, and the induction of plant systemic resistance. These mechanisms, combined with the capacity of Trichoderma spp. to colonize plant roots and interact with the rhizosphere microbiome, enable the effective suppression of Alternaria pathogens while simultaneously promoting plant growth and stress tolerance. The multifunctional nature of these interactions highlights the ecological versatility of Trichoderma and its capacity to contribute significantly to improved plant health and productivity.

Beyond direct pathogen suppression, the integration of Trichoderma-based biocontrol strategies offers a promising pathway toward reducing the reliance on chemical fungicides in horticultural production systems. By combining antagonistic activity with plant growth–promoting effects and enhanced stress resilience, Trichoderma spp. function not only as a biocontrol agent but also as a key component of sustainable crop management. The growing body of experimental and field-based evidence suggests that incorporating Trichoderma into integrated disease management programs can support environmentally responsible disease control while maintaining crop yield and quality. Such approaches align with global efforts to develop more resilient agricultural systems capable of meeting increasing food demands while minimizing environmental impacts.

Despite these promising attributes, several challenges remain that influence the consistency and large-scale adoption of Trichoderma-based biocontrol strategies. Variability in field performance, formulation stability, ecological interactions with indigenous microbiota, and regulatory constraints continue to limit broader implementation. Future research should therefore focus on improving strain selection, optimizing formulations and delivery systems, and integrating advanced genomic and metabolomic tools to better understand and enhance the functional traits of Trichoderma. Ultimately, the successful application of Trichoderma in horticultural disease management will depend on combining scientific innovation with practical agricultural strategies to ensure reliable, scalable, and environmentally sustainable plant protection.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Yordanys Ramos, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Reviewed by: Nicolás Pastor, National University of Río Cuarto, Argentina

Enrique Castrejon, Universidad de Colima, Mexico

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by Universitas Padjadjaran through Riset Data Pustaka dan Daring (RPDP) Program (Contract No. 2156/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2024).

Author contributions

RK: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. NR: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. DP: Writing – review & editing. TJ: Writing – review & editing. MA: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. NA: Writing – review & editing. BI: Writing – review & editing. MM: Writing – review & editing. WH: Writing – review & editing. RJ: Writing – review & editing. FD: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Universitas Padjadjaran for the support and facilities provided through RPDP Program.

References

  1. Aamir M., Shanmugam V., Dubey M. K., Kumar V., Kumar A., Singh A.. (2023). Transcriptomic characterization of Trichoderma harzianum T34 primed tomato plants: Assessment of biocontrol agent induced host specific gene expression and plant growth promotion. BMC Plant Biol. 23, 552. doi: doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04502-6
  2. Abbas A., Mubeen M., Zheng H., Sohail M. A., Shakeel Q., Solanki M. K.. (2022). Trichoderma spp. genes involved in the biocontrol activity against Rhizoctonia solani. Front. Microbiol. 13, 884469. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.884469
  3. Abdenaceur R., Benzina-Tihar F., Sahir-Halouane F. (2024). Volatile organic compounds activities of Trichoderma species isolated from olive grove soil against the wilt pathogen, Verticillium dahliae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 170, 789 – 803. doi: doi:10.1007/s10658-024-02839-8
  4. Abdessemed N., Kerroum A., Bahet Y. A., Talbi N., Zermane N. (2019). First report of Alternaria leaf spot caused by Alternaria alternata (Fries.) Kiessler on Sonchus oleraceus L. and Convolvulus arvensis L. in Algeria. J. Phytopathol. 167, 321 – 325. doi: doi:10.1111/jph.12800
  5. Abo-Elyousr K. A. M., Abdel-Hafez S. I. I., Abdel-Rahim I. R. (2014). Isolation of Trichoderma and evaluation of their antagonistic potential against Alternaria porri. J. Phytopathol. 162, 567 – 574. doi: doi:10.1111/jph.12228
  6. Aerts N., Chhillar H., Ding P., Van Wees S. C. M. (2022). Transcriptional regulation of plant innate immunity. Essays Biochem. 66, 607 – 620. doi: doi:10.1042/EBC20210100
  7. Ahmed M., Babayola M., Bake I. D. (2024 a). Role of horticultural crops in food and nutritional security: A review. J. Nutr. Food. Process. 7, 1 – 6. doi: doi:10.31579/2637-8914/226
  8. Ahmed S., Nazir N., Zhang B., Chachar Z., Li J., Xiao G.. (2024 b). Micronutrients and their effects on horticultural crop quality, productivity and sustainability. Sci. Hortic. 323, 112512. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112512
  9. Ahmed H. A., Kasem L. M., Attaby H. S., Khalil N. M., El Amir D. A., Diab M. R.. (2025). Molecular and genetic adaptations of heat-treated Trichoderma harzianum for enhanced stress resilience and biocontrol efficiency. Ann. Microbiol. 75, 12. doi: doi:10.1186/s13213-025-01800-2
  10. Akbari S. I., Prismantoro D., Rossiana N., Doni F. (2024). Trichoderma spp. isolates stimulate rice seedling growth of Sertani 13 variety. J. Agron. Indones. 52, 45 – 53. doi: doi:10.24831/jai.v52i1.50849
  11. Algifari M. H., Prismantoro D., Hafsari A. R., Miranti M., Wan-Mohtar W. A. A. Q. I., Ozturk A. B.. (2025). Performance of hydrolytic enzymes produced by Trichoderma in sustainable crop production: Current insights and future perspectives. Sustain. Environ. 11, 1 – 33. doi: doi:10.1080/27658511.2025.2593746
  12. Ali S., Tyagi A., Rajarammohan S., Mir Z., Bae H. (2023). Revisiting Alternaria-host interactions: New insights on its pathogenesis, defense mechanisms and control strategies. Sci. Hortic. 322, 112424. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112424
  13. Almagro L., Gómez Ros L. V., Belchi-Navarro S., Bru R., Ros Barceló A., Pedreño M. A. (2009). Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 377 – 390. doi: doi:10.1093/jxb/ern277
  14. Almeida N. O., Oliveira C. M., Ulhoa C. J., Côrtes M. V. C. B., Lobo Júnior M., Rocha M. R. (2022). Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma asperellum are potential biocontrol agents of Meloidogyne javanica in banana cv. Grande Naine. Biol. Control 175, 105054. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105054
  15. Al-Mekhlafi N. A., Al-Harethi A. A., Alzanam N. Y. (2025). Bioefficacy of Trichoderma citrinoviride against some plant pathogenic fungi. Sci. Rep. 15, 45346. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29663-2
  16. Al-Salim A., Abdulrahman T. S., Taha H., Alfayadh H., Abdulrazzaq E. A., Alshoka M.. (2025). The role of horticultural plants in developing healthy foods rich in active bioactive compounds: A review. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. Farming 1, 01 – 07. doi: doi:10.54660/IJASF.2025.1.6.01-07
  17. Alsalmo A., Kayim M., Nawaz H., Hamijo T., Kafkas N. E. (2026). Dual culture and VOC analysis reveal Trichoderma harzianum as an effective biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on chickpea. J. Plant Prot. Res. 66, 11 – 24. doi: doi:10.24425/jppr.2026.158064
  18. Alukumbura A. S., Bigi A., Sarrocco S., Fernando W. G. D., Vannacci G., Mazzoncini M.. (2022). Minimal impacts on the wheat microbiome when Trichoderma gamsii T6085 is applied as a biocontrol agent to manage fusarium head blight disease. Front. Microbiol. 13, 972016. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.972016
  19. Andrzejak R., Janowska B. (2022). Trichoderma spp. improves flowering, quality, and nutritional status of ornamental plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 15662. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms232415662
  20. Angeles Flores G., Cusumano G., Venanzoni R., Angelini P. (2026). Biodiversity-driven natural products and bioactive metabolites. Plants 15, 104. doi: doi:10.3390/plants15010104
  21. Arias-Chavarría L. D., Batista-Menezes D., Orozco-Cayasso S., Vargas-Martínez A., Vega-Baudrit J. R., Montes de Oca-Vásquez G. (2025). Evaluation of the viability of microencapsulated Trichoderma longibrachiatum conidia as a strategy to prolong the shelf life of the fungus as a biological control agent. Front. Chem. 12, 1473217. doi: doi:10.3389/fchem.2024.1473217
  22. Arias Mota R. M., Gregorio Cipriano R., Martínez Santos A. G., Heredia Abarca G. (2025). Integrative taxonomy reveals two new Trichoderma species and a first Mexican record from coffee soils in Veracruz. J. Fungi 11, 856. doi: doi:10.3390/jof11120856
  23. Armenova N., Tsigoriyna L., Arsov A., Stefanov S., Petrov K., Mu W.. (2026). Antifungal biocontrol in sustainable crop protection: Microbial lipopeptides, polyketides, and plant-derived agents. J. Fungi 12, 22. doi: doi:10.3390/jof12010022
  24. Arseneault T., Filion M. (2017). Biocontrol through antibiosis: Exploring the role played by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics in soil and their impact on plant pathogens. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 39, 267 – 274. doi: doi:10.1080/07060661.2017.1354335
  25. Arya G. C., Cohen H. (2022). The multifaceted roles of fungal cutinases during infection. J. Fungi 8, 199. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8020199
  26. Arzanlou M., Khodaei S., Narmani A., Babai-Ahari A., Azar A. M. (2014). Inhibitory effect of Trichoderma isolates on growth of Alternaria alternata, the causal agent of leaf spot disease on sunflower, under laboratory conditions. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 47, 1592 – 1599. doi: doi:10.1080/03235408.2013.853453
  27. Asad S. A., Tabassum A., Hameed A., Hassan F. U., Afzal A., Khan S. A.. (2015). Determination of lytic enzyme activities of indigenous Trichoderma isolates from Pakistan. Braz. J. Microbiol. 46, 1053 – 1064. doi: doi:10.1590/S1517-838246420140787
  28. Atanasova L., Marchetti-Deschmann M., Nemes A., Bruckner B., Rehulka P., Stralis-Pavese N.. (2023). Mycoparasitism related targets of Tmk1 indicate stimulating regulatory functions of this MAP kinase in Trichoderma atroviride. Sci. Rep. 13, 19976. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47027-6
  29. Atlagić K., Cvetić Antić T., Lukičić J., Kruščić K., Živić M., Unković N.. (2025). Biocontrol potential of native Trichoderma strains toward soil-borne phytopathogenic and saprotrophic fungi. J. Fungi 11, 535. doi: doi:10.3390/jof11070535
  30. Ávila-Oviedo J. L., Chávez-Avilés M. N. (2026). Ecological versatility and biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma spp.: Toward sustainable agriculture. Discover Appl. Sci. 8, 230. doi: doi:10.1007/s42452-026-08253-5
  31. Awad-Allah F. A. E., Ibrahim M. A. A., Sherin A. F. A., Amany H. M. S., Ibrahim H. E. (2023). Trichoderma species: An overview of current status and potential applications for sustainable agriculture. Indian J. Agric. Res. 57, 273 – 282. doi: doi:10.18805/IJARe.AF-751
  32. Awal M. A., Prismantoro D., Dwisandi R. F., Chua K. O., Mispan M. S., Suhaimi N. S.. (2025). Deciphering the biocontrol strategies of Trichoderma yunnanense TM10 against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae, the causal agent of wilt disease in shallots (Allium cepa var. aggregatum). Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 3, 100484. doi: doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100484
  33. Aznar-Sánchez J. A., Velasco-Muñoz J. F., López-Felices B., Román-Sánchez I. M. (2020). An analysis of global research trends on greenhouse technology: Towards a sustainable agriculture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 664. doi: doi:10.3390/ijerph17020664
  34. Bacha S. A. S., Li Y., Nie J., Xu G., Han L., Farooq S. (2023). Comprehensive review on patulin and Alternaria toxins in fruit and derived products. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1139757. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1139757
  35. Baek I., Bhatt J., Jang J. H., Lim S., Lovelace A., Cha M.. (2025). Dissecting Trichoderma antagonism: Role of strain identity, volatiles, biomass, and morphology in suppressing cacao pathogens. Biol. Control 207, 105807. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105807
  36. Balodi R., Raghavendra K. V., Singh P. K., Hussain Z., Suroshe S. S., Kumar P.. (2024). Alternaria alternata species complex impairing solanaceous vegetables in northern parts of India: An emerging problem in Solanum lycopersicum L. 3 Biotech. 14, 218. doi: doi:10.1007/s13205-024-04059-7
  37. Ban G., Akanda S., Maino M. (2018). The effect of Trichoderma on the growth and development of tomato and bean under greenhouse and field conditions. Ann. Trop. Res. 40, 35 – 45. doi: doi:10.32945/atr4013.2018
  38. Bandara A. Y., Kang S. (2024). Trichoderma application methods differentially affect tomato growth, rhizomicrobiome, and rhizosphere soil suppressiveness against Fusarium oxysporum. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1366690. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1366690
  39. Bao W. J., Shen L. J., Xia S. W., Yang X. D. (2024). Effect of pH on the growth and competition of Trichoderma spp. and Fusarium spp. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 35, 2535 – 2542. doi: doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202409.032
  40. Bao D. F., Zhang J. Y., Lu Y. Z., Tian X. G., Hyde K. D., Liu N. G.. (2025). Endophytic fungi associated with medicinal ferns in Guizhou Province, China I: Morphomolecular characterization of culturable endophytic fungi associated with Dicranopteris spp. Mycosphere 16, 2259 – 2455. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/13
  41. Bardin M., Ajouz S., Comby M., Lopez-Ferber M., Graillot B., Siegwart M.. (2015). Is the efficacy of biological control against plant diseases likely to be more durable than that of chemical pesticides ? Front. Plant Sci. 6, 566. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00566
  42. Basak A. R., Pallob A. T., Jahan F., Hasan M. H., Olife M. R. I., Saha A.. (2026). Molecular and physiological mechanisms of Trichoderma-induced plant defense against phytopathogens. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 141, 103030. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2025.103030
  43. Beg M. A., Aktaruzzaman M., Lewis K. J., Oliver J. E. (2025). Fungicide resistance profiles of Alternaria spp. associated with fruit rot of blueberry in Georgia, USA. Front. Plant Sci. 16, 1524586. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1524586
  44. Bjørk N., Lysøe E., Kauserud H., Naarmann A., Skrede I. (2022). Peptaibol production and characterization from Trichoderma asperellum and their action as biofungicide. J. Fungi 8, 1037. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8101037
  45. Blagojević J., Vukojević J., Ivanović B., Ivanović Ž. (2020). Characterization of Alternaria species associated with leaf spot disease of Armoracia rusticana in Serbia. Plant Dis. 104, 1378 – 1389. doi: doi:10.1094/PDIS-02-19-0289-RE
  46. Brouwer S. M., Odilbekov F., Burra D. D., Lenman M., Hedley P. E., Grenville-Briggs L.. (2020). Intact salicylic acid signalling is required for potato defence against the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria solani. Plant Mol. Biol. 104, 1 – 19. doi: doi:10.1007/s11103-020-01019-6
  47. Cao C., Gong S., Li Y., Tang J., Li T., Zhang Q. (2024). Pathogenic factors and mechanisms of the Alternaria leaf spot pathogen in apple. Horticulturae 10, 212. doi: doi:10.3390/horticulturae10030212
  48. Castaldi S., Zorrilla J. G., Petrillo C., Russo M. T., Ambrosino P., Masi M.. (2023). Alternaria alternata isolated from infected pears (Pyrus communis) in Italy produces non-host toxins and hydrolytic enzymes as infection mechanisms and exhibits competitive exclusion against Botrytis cinerea in co-infected host fruits. J. Fungi 9, 326. doi: doi:10.3390/jof9030326
  49. Cavalcante A. L. A., Negreiros A. M. P., Melo N. J. A., Santos F. J. Q., Soares Silva C. S. A., Pinto P. S. L.. (2025). Adaptability and sensitivity of Trichoderma spp. isolates to environmental factors and fungicides. Microorganisms 13, 1689. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms13071689
  50. Charpe A. M., Aglave B., Ghosh D. K. (2025). Microbial-mediated induced resistance: Interactive effects for improving crop health. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1660944. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1660944
  51. Chávez-Avilés M. N., García-Álvarez M., Ávila-Oviedo J. L., Hernández-Hernández I., Bautista-Ortega P. I., Macías-Rodríguez L. I. (2024). Volatile organic compounds produced by Trichoderma asperellum with antifungal properties against Colletotrichum acutatum. Microorganisms 12, 2007. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms12102007
  52. Chen X., Lu Y., Liu X., Gu Y., Li F. (2025). Trichoderma: Dual roles in biocontrol and plant growth promotion. Microorganisms 13, 1840. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms13081840
  53. Chen A., Mao X., Sun Q., Wei Z., Li J., You Y.. (2021). Alternaria mycotoxins: An overview of toxicity, metabolism, and analysis in food. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 69, 7817 – 7830. doi: doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03007
  54. Chikte T., Kopta T., Psota V., Arizmendi J., Chwil M. (2024). A comprehensive review of low- and zero-residue pesticide methods in vegetable production. Agronomy 14, 2745. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy14112745
  55. Chung K. R. (2012). Stress response and pathogenicity of the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata. Scientifica 2012, 635431. doi: doi:10.6064/2012/635431
  56. Clough S. E., Jousset A., Elphinstone J. G., Friman V. P. (2022). Combining in vitro and in vivo screening to identify efficient Pseudomonas biocontrol strains against the phytopathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiol. Open 11, e1283. doi: doi:10.1002/mbo3.1283
  57. Contreras-Cornejo H. A., Macías-Rodríguez L., del-Val E., Larsen J. (2016). Ecological functions of Trichoderma spp. and their secondary metabolites in the rhizosphere: Interactions with plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw036. doi: doi:10.1093/femsec/fiw036
  58. Contreras-Cornejo H. A., Schmoll M., Esquivel-Ayala B. A., González-Esquivel C. E., Rocha-Ramírez V., Larsen J. (2024). Mechanisms for plant growth promotion activated by Trichoderma in natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Microbiol. Res. 281, 127621. doi: doi:10.1016/j.micres.2024.127621
  59. Contreras-Soto M. B., Tovar-Pedraza J. M., Solano-Báez A. R., Bayardo-Rosales H., Márquez-Licona G. (2025). Biocontrol strategies against plant-parasitic nematodes using Trichoderma spp.: Mechanisms, applications, and management perspectives. J. Fungi 11, 517. doi: doi:10.3390/jof11070517
  60. Coppola M., Cascone P., Lelio I. D., Woo S. L., Lorito M., Rao R.. (2019). Trichoderma atroviride P1 colonization of tomato plants enhances both direct and indirect defense barriers against insects. Front. Physiol. 10, Article 813. doi: doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00813
  61. Cortez-Lázaro A. A., Vázquez-Medina P. J., Caro-Degollar E. M., García Evangelista J. V., Cortez-Lázaro R. A., Rojas-Paz J. L.. (2025). Global trends in Trichoderma secondary metabolites in sustainable agricultural bioprotection. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1595946. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1595946
  62. Creedon A. C., Hubbard V., Gibson R., Dimidi E. (2025). Diversity of plant-based food consumption: A systematic scoping review on measurement tools and associated health outcomes. Nutr. Rev. 83, 1985 – 2014. doi: doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaf040
  63. Csótó A., Tóth G., Riczu P., Zabiák A., Tarjányi V., Fekete E.. (2024). Foliar spraying with endophytic Trichoderma biostimulant increases drought resilience of maize and sunflower. Agriculture 14, 2360. doi: doi:10.3390/agriculture14122360
  64. Cui H., Cheng Q., Jing T., Chen Y., Li X., Zhang M.. (2025). Trichoderma virens XZ11-1 producing siderophores inhibits the infection of Fusarium oxysporum and promotes plant growth in banana plants. Microb. Cell Fact. 24, 22. doi: doi:10.1186/s12934-024-02626-4
  65. Daichi M. B., Masiello M., Haidukowski M., De Girolamo A., Moretti A., Bencheikh A.. (2025). Assessing Alternaria species and related mycotoxin contamination in wheat in Algeria: A food safety risk. Toxins 17, 309. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins17060309
  66. Daryaei A., Eirian Jones E., Glare T. R., Falloon R. E. (2016). pH and water activity in culture media affect biological control activity of Trichoderma atroviride against Rhizoctonia solani. Biol. Control 92, 24 – 30. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.09.001
  67. Deka B., Upamanya G. K., Buzar Baruah R. M. (2024). Eco friendly management of Alternaria blight disease: A review. Asian J. Adv. Agric. Res. 24, 34 – 43. doi: doi:10.9734/ajaar/2024/v24i10554
  68. dela Cruz T. E. E., Behr J. H., Geistlinger J., Grosch R., Witzel K. (2023). Monitoring of an applied beneficial Trichoderma strain in root-associated soil of field-grown maize by MALDI-TOF MS. Microorganisms 11, 1655. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms11071655
  69. DeMers M. (2022). Alternaria alternata as endophyte and pathogen. Microbiology 168, Article 001153. doi: doi:10.1099/mic.0.001153
  70. Deng Y., Wang J., Tung J., Liu D., Zhou Y., He S.. (2018). Trichoderma enhances plant growth and disease resistance through modulation of plant defense signaling pathways. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 31, 691 – 702. doi: doi:10.1094/MPMI-10-17-0254-R
  71. Dong Y., Ahammed G. J. (2026). Mechanisms of Trichoderma-induced plant immunity: An RNA-epigenetic perspective. Plant Sci. 365, 113030. doi: doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2026.113030
  72. Doni F., Isahak A., Che Mohd Zain C. R., Wan Yusoff W. M. (2014). Physiological and growth response of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) to Trichoderma spp. inoculants. AMB Express 4, 45. doi: doi:10.1186/s13568-014-0045-8
  73. Doni F., Safitri R., Suhaimi N. S. M., Miranti M., Rossiana N., Mispan M. S.. (2023). Evaluating the underlying physiological and molecular mechanisms in the system of rice intensification performance with Trichoderma-rice plant symbiosis as a model system. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1214213. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1214213
  74. Dou K., Lu Z., Wu Q., Ni M., Yu C., Wang M.. (2020). MIST: A multilocus identification system for Trichoderma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e01532–20. doi: doi:10.1128/AEM.01532-20
  75. Dourou M., La Porta C. A. M. (2023). A pipeline to investigate fungal–fungal interactions: Trichoderma isolates against plant-associated fungi. J. Fungi 9, 461. doi: doi:10.3390/jof9040461
  76. Dučkena L., Bessadat N., Bataillé-Simoneau N., Hamon B., Koppel M., Loit K.. (2024). Haplotype diversity and phylogeny within Alternaria alternata and A. arborescens species complexes from tomatoes. Fungal Biol. 128, 2250 – 2265. doi: doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2024.10.002
  77. Duhan D., Gajbhiye S., Jaswal R., Singh R. P., Sharma T. R., Rajarammohan S. (2021). Functional characterization of the Nep1-like protein effectors of the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicae. Front. Microbiol. 12, Article 738617. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.738617
  78. Dutta P., Deb L., Pandey A. K. (2022). Trichoderma—From lab bench to field application: Looking back over 50 years. Front. Agron. 4, Article 932839. doi: doi:10.3389/fagro.2022.932839
  79. Dutta R., Kumar S., Jayalakshmi K., Radhakrishna A., Bhagat K., Manjunatha Gowda D. C.. (2024). Potential of Trichoderma strains to positively modulate plant growth processes and bulb yield in Rabi onion. Front. Sustain. Food. Syst. 8, 1427303. doi: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1427303
  80. Dutta P., Mahanta M., Singh S. B., Thakuria D., Deb L., Kumari A.. (2023). Molecular interaction between plants and Trichoderma species against soil-borne plant pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1145715. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1145715
  81. Ebadi M., Ebadi A. (2024). Genetic diversity and population structure of Alternaria alternata: An endophytic fungus isolated from various hosts. Fungal Biol. 128, 2305 – 2310. doi: doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2024.11.005
  82. Effmert U., Kalderás J., Warnke R., Piechulla B. (2012). Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 665 – 703. doi: doi:10.1007/s10886-012-0135-5
  83. Elhamouly N. A., Hewedy O. A., Zaitoon A., Miraples A., Elshorbagy O. T., Hussien S.. (2022). The hidden power of secondary metabolites in plant–fungi interactions and sustainable phytoremediation. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 1044896. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1044896
  84. El-Sheikh E-S. A-M., Shahein N. M. M. (2025). The beneficial microorganisms for sustainable plant disease management: A systematic review. Microb. Bioact. 8, 1 – 11. doi: doi:10.25163/microbbioacts.8110412
  85. Erdogan O., Guzel M. (2025). “ Mycelial inhibitory effect of propolis extract against two phytopathogenic Alternaria species,” in J. Sci. Eng. Res, Rajasthan: Leon Publications vol. 12., 49 – 57. Available online at: https://jsaer.com/download/vol-12-iss-1-2025/JSAER2025-12-1-49-57.pdf (Accessed December 11, 2025).
  86. Escrivá L., Oueslati S., Font G., Manyes L. (2017). Alternaria mycotoxins in food and feed: An overview. J. Food Qual. 2017, 1569748. doi: doi:10.1155/2017/1569748
  87. Fernandes C., Casadevall A., Gonçalves T. (2023). Mechanisms of Alternaria pathogenesis in animals and plants. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 47, 1 – 25. doi: doi:10.1093/femsre/fuad061
  88. Fernandes C., Mota M., Barros L., Dias M. I., Ferreira I. C. F. R., Piedade A. P.. (2021). Pyomelanin synthesis in Alternaria alternata inhibits DHN-melanin synthesis and decreases cell wall chitin content and thickness. Front. Microbiol. 12, 691433. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.691433
  89. Fikadu A. A., Nomura H., Gebre G. G., Shah P., Takahashi Y., Yabe M. (2025). Heterogeneous effects of horticulture commercialization and gender-based decision-making on smallholder farmers’ income: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Jimma zone, Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Res. 19, 101565. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101565
  90. Fiorentino N., Ventorino V., Woo S. L., Pepe O., De Rosa A., Gioia L.. (2018). Trichoderma-based biostimulants modulate rhizosphere microbial populations and improve N uptake efficiency, yield, and nutritional quality of leafy vegetables. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 743. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00743
  91. Flatschacher D., Eschlböck A., Pierson S., Schreiner U., Stock V., Schiller A.. (2025). Linking a polyketide synthase gene cluster to 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone, a Trichoderma metabolite with diverse bioactivities. Microb. Cell Fact. 24, 89. doi: doi:10.1186/s12934-025-02718-9
  92. Fonseca-Guerra I. R., Beltrán Pineda M. E., Benavides Rozo M. E. (2023). Characterization of Alternaria alternata and Alternaria scrophulariae brown spot in Colombian quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). J. Fungi 9, 947. doi: doi:10.3390/jof9090947
  93. Forero L. E., Grenzer J., Heinze J., Schittko C., Kulmatiski A. (2019). Greenhouse- and field-measured plant–soil feedbacks are not correlated. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 184. doi: doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00184
  94. Gao Y., Ren H., He S., Duan S., Xing S., Li X.. (2022). Antifungal activity of the volatile organic compounds produced by Ceratocystis fimbriata strains WSJK-1 and Mby. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1034939. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034939
  95. Gao F., Wang Z., Zhu J., Li W., Wang X., Yang X.. (2025). The characterization and antifungal activities of two new Trichoderma antagonistic fungi against four apple disease pathogens. Biol. Control 200, 105689. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105689
  96. Garbeva P., Hordijk C., Gerards S., de Boer W. (2014). Volatile-mediated interactions between phylogenetically different soil bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 5, 289. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00289
  97. Garcés-Moncayo M. F., Romero C. A., Pérez-Martínez S., Noceda C., Galarza L. L., del Castillo D. S. (2025). Differential strain-specific responses of Trichoderma spp. in mycoparasitism, chitinase activity, and volatiles production against Moniliophthora spp. Microorganisms 13, 1499. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms13071499
  98. García-Calvo L., Ullán R. V., Fernández-Aguado M., García-Lino A. M., Balaña-Fouce R., Barreiro C. (2018). Secreted protein extract analyses present the plant pathogen Alternaria alternata as a suitable industrial enzyme toolbox. J. Proteomics 177, 48 – 64. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2018.02.012
  99. García-Latorre C., Ruiz-Moyano S., Rodríguez A., Velázquez R., Poblaciones M. J., Hernández A. (2025). From field to fork: The benefits of Trichoderma spp. in food quality and safety. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 63, 101286. doi: doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101286
  100. Garmendia A., Ferriol M., Beltrán R., García-Breijo F., Raigón M. D., Parra M. D. C.. (2025). Plant protection products to control Alternaria brown spot caused by Alternaria alternata in citrus: A systematic review. Agronomy 15, 1343. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy15061343
  101. Geng Y., Chen S., Lv P., Li Y., Li J., Jiang F.. (2025). Positive role of Trichoderma harzianum in increasing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses: A review. Antioxidants 14, 807. doi: doi:10.3390/antiox14070807
  102. Ghalib A., Prasad M., Kumar A., Kajla A. (2025). Seasonal occurrence and severity of early blight of potato caused by Alternaria solani (L.) in relation to weather conditions. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 31, 434 – 443. doi: doi:10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i53041
  103. Gholizadeh Vazvani M., Dashti H., Saberi Riseh R. (2026). Physiological and biochemical markers associated with root lignification and micronutrient uptake in wheat genotypes with contrasting resistance to Gaeumannomyces tritici. Sci. Rep. 16, 8056. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-026-39324-7
  104. Go W. Z., Chin K. L., H’ng P. S., Wong M. Y., Lee C. L., Khoo P. S. (2023). Exploring the biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma spp. against Rigidoporus microporus, the causal agent of white root rot disease in rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Plants 12, 1066. doi: doi:10.3390/plants12051066
  105. Gualtieri L., Monti M. M., Mele F., Russo A., Pedata P. A., Ruocco M. (2022). Volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles of different Trichoderma species and their potential application. J. Fungi 8, 989. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8100989
  106. Guo Y., Ghirardo A., Weber B., Schnitzler J. P., Benz J. P., Rosenkranz M. (2019). Trichoderma species differ in their volatile profiles and in antagonism toward ectomycorrhiza Laccaria bicolor. Front. Microbiol. 10, 891. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00891
  107. Guo Q., Shi L., Wang X., Li D., Yin Z., Zhang J.. (2023). Structures and biological activities of secondary metabolites from the Trichoderma genus (covering 2018–2022). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 71, 13612 – 13632. doi: doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04540
  108. Gupta A., Bhardwaj M., Tran L.-S. P. (2020). Jasmonic acid at the crossroads of plant immunity and Pseudomonas syringae virulence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7482. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms21207482
  109. Gutiérrez-Moreno K., Olguín-Martínez A. I., Montoya-Martínez A. C., de los Santos-Villalobos S. (2025). Trichoderma in sustainable agriculture and the challenges related to its effectiveness. Diversity 17, 734. doi: doi:10.3390/d17100734
  110. Guzmán-Guzmán P., Kumar A., de Los Santos-Villalobos S., Parra-Cota F. I., Orozco-Mosqueda M. D. C., Fadiji A. E.. (2023). Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants 12, 432. doi: doi:10.3390/plants12030432
  111. Guzmán-Guzmán P., Valencia-Cantero E., Santoyo G. (2024). Plant growth-promoting bacteria potentiate antifungal and plant-beneficial responses of Trichoderma atroviride by upregulating its effector functions. PloS One 19, e0301139. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301139
  112. Habib W., Masiello M., El Ghorayeb R., Gerges E., Susca A., Meca G.. (2021). Mycotoxin profile and phylogeny of pathogenic Alternaria species isolated from symptomatic tomato plants in Lebanon. Toxins 13, 513. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins13080513
  113. Halifu S., Deng X., Song X., Song R. (2019). Effects of two Trichoderma strains on plant growth, rhizosphere soil nutrients, and fungal community of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica annual seedlings. Forests 10, 758. doi: doi:10.3390/f10090758
  114. Halo B. A., Al-Yahyai R. A., Al-Sadi A. M. (2018). Aspergillus terreus inhibits growth and induces morphological abnormalities in Pythium aphanidermatum and suppresses Pythium-induced damping-off of cucumber. Front. Microbiol. 9, 95. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00095
  115. Hasim S., Coleman J. J. (2019). Targeting the fungal cell wall: Current therapies and implications for development of alternative antifungal agents. Future Med. Chem. 11, 869 – 883. doi: doi:10.4155/fmc-2018-0465
  116. Heller J., Tudzynski P. (2011). Reactive oxygen species in phytopathogenic fungi: Signaling, development, and disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49, 369 – 390. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095355
  117. Herrera-Rodriguez G., Felix-Gastelum R., Irazoqui-Acosta M. B., Armenta-Lopez S. E., Longoria-Espinoza R. M., Orduño-Espinoza F. J.. (2026). In vitro and field effectiveness of the combination of four Trichoderma spp. against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and its impact on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop production. Plants 15, 156. doi: doi:10.3390/plants15010156
  118. Hong S. Y., Roze L. V., Linz J. E. (2013). Oxidative stress-related transcription factors in the regulation of secondary metabolism. Toxins 5, 683 – 702. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins5040683
  119. Hönig M., Roeber V. M., Schmülling T., Cortleven A. (2023). Chemical priming of plant defense responses to pathogen attacks. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1146577. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1146577
  120. Imran M., Abo-Elyousr K. A. M., Mousa M. A., Saad M. M. (2022). Screening and biocontrol evaluation of indigenous native Trichoderma spp. against early blight disease and their field assessment to alleviate natural infection. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 32, 40. doi: doi:10.1186/s41938-022-00544-4
  121. Imran M., Abo-Elyousr K. A. M., Mousa M. A. A., Saad M. M. (2023). Use of Trichoderma culture filtrates as a sustainable approach to mitigate early blight disease of tomato and their influence on plant biomarkers and antioxidants production. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1192818. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1192818
  122. Inayati A., Sulistyowati L., Aini L. Q., Yusnawan E. (2019). Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds from Trichoderma virens. AIP Conf. Proc. 2120, 080012. doi: doi:10.1063/1.5115750
  123. Intana W., Wonglom P., Suwannarach N., Sunpapao A. (2022). Trichoderma asperelloides PSU-P1 induced expression of pathogenesis-related protein genes against gummy stem blight of muskmelon (Cucumis melo) in field evaluation. J. Fungi 8, 156. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8020156
  124. Islam M. R., Chowdhury R., Roy A. S., Islam M. N., Mita M. M., Bashar S.. (2023). Native Trichoderma induced the defense-related enzymes and genes in rice against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). Plants 12, 1864. doi: doi:10.3390/plants12091864
  125. Jaenicke H., Virchow D. (2018). The contribution of horticulture to sustainable development. Acta Hortic. 1205, 13 – 20. doi: doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1205.2
  126. Jambhulkar P. P., Singh B., Raja M., Ismaiel A., Lakshman D. K., Tomar M.. (2024). Genetic diversity and antagonistic properties of Trichoderma strains from the crop rhizospheres in southern Rajasthan, India. Sci. Rep. 14, 8610. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58302-5
  127. Jaramillo-López P. F., Romero J. B., Sarabia M., Fonteyne S., Saldivia-Tejeda A., Verhulst N.. (2024). Non-target effects of pesticide and microbial seed treatments in maize and barley on the resident soil microbiota under conservation agriculture. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 122, 103653. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103653
  128. Jatana B. S., Grover S., Ram H., Baath G. S. (2024). Seed priming: Molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Agronomy 14, 2901. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy14122901
  129. Jefferson T. A., Alizadeh M., Prismantoro D., Albert M., Rossiana N., Miranti M.. (2026 c). Maize microbiome assembly and engineering: Implications for nutrient acquisition, stress resilience, and disease suppression. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 72 (1), 1 – 20. doi: doi:10.1080/03650340.2026.2679300
  130. Jefferson T. A., Alizadeh M., Prismantoro D., Albert M., Wulandari I., Miranti M.. (2026 b). The microbiome as the second genome: Engineering the phytobiome for climate-resilient agriculture. J. Plant Interact. 21, 1 – 22. doi: doi:10.1080/17429145.2026.2649126
  131. Jefferson T. A., Miranti M., Awal M. A., Hafsari A. R., Prismantoro D., Joshi R. C.. (2026 a). Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) for controlling rice diseases: a sustainable approach. Cogent Food Agric. 12, 1 – 18. doi: doi:10.1080/23311932.2025.2610015
  132. Jiang J., Guo X., Tan H., Ding M., Liu F., Yang Z.. (2023). Transcriptome sequencing leads to an improved understanding of the infection mechanism of Alternaria solani in potato. BMC Plant Biol. 23, 120. doi: doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04103-3
  133. Jiménez-Bremont J. F., González-Pérez E., Ortega-Amaro M. A., Madrigal-Ortiz S., Duque-Ortiz A., Mendoza-Mendoza A. (2024). Volatile organic compounds emitted by Trichoderma: Small molecules with biotechnological potential. Sci. Hortic. 325, 112656. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112656
  134. Jones R. W., Perez F. (2023). Differential plant response to toxins and elicitor proteins released by the potato and tomato pathogens Alternaria solani and Alternaria alternata. J. Plant Pathol. 105, 21 – 28. doi: doi:10.1007/s42161-022-01286-w
  135. Joo J. H., Hussein K. A. (2022). Biological control and plant growth promotion properties of volatile organic compound-producing antagonistic Trichoderma spp. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 897668. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.897668
  136. Joshi N., Saraf M., Jha C. K., Sudha A., Alharbi S. A., Alfarraj S.. (2023). Harnessing the efficacy of multifunctional rhizobacterial consortia for promoting the growth of Anethum graveolens L. Front. Sustain. Food. Syst. 7, 1126621. doi: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1126621
  137. Jung J., Ahn S., Kim D.-H., Riu M. (2024). Triple interactions for induced systemic resistance in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1464710. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1464710
  138. Kaman P., Senapoty D., Shiva Sai Swaroop V., Deva Nath H. K., Das A., Dutta P.. (2024). “ Trichoderma spp. allelopathies in the rhizosphere of plants: For the management of soil-borne pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani,” in Challenges in plant disease detection and recent advancements (London: IntechOpen). doi: doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004753
  139. Karličić V., Zlatković M., Jovičić-Petrović J., Nikolić M. P., Orlović S., Raičević V. (2021). Trichoderma spp. from pine bark and pine bark extracts: Potent biocontrol agents against Botryosphaeriaceae. Forests 12, 1731. doi: doi:10.3390/f12121731
  140. Kathi S., Laza H., Singh S., Thompson L., Li W., Simpson C. (2024). A decade of improving nutritional quality of horticultural crops agronomically, (2012–2022): A systematic literature review. Sci. Total Environ. 911, 168665. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168665
  141. Khalil M. I. I., Youssef S. A., Tartoura K. A., Eldesoky A. A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of physiological and biochemical alteration in tomato plants infected by Alternaria alternata in response to Trichoderma viride and Chaetomium globosum application. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 115, 101671. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101671
  142. Khan M. S. S., Islam F., Chen H., Chang M., Wang D., Liu F.. (2022). Transcriptional coactivators: Driving force of plant immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 823937. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.823937
  143. Khan R. A. A., Najeeb S., Hussain S., Xie B., Li Y. (2020). Bioactive secondary metabolites from Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogenic fungi. Microorganisms 8, 817. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms8060817
  144. Kim N. E., Dettman J. R. (2025). Genome mining reveals the distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters in Alternaria and related fungal taxa within the family Pleosporaceae. BMC Genomics 26, 678. doi: doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11754-z
  145. Kissoudis C., van de Wiel C., Visser R. G. F., van der Linden G. (2014). Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 207. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00207
  146. Köhl J., Kolnaar R., Ravensberg W. J. (2019). Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: Relevance beyond efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 845. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00845
  147. Kredics L., Büchner R., Balázs D., Allaga H., Kedves O., Racić G.. (2024). Recent advances in the use of Trichoderma-containing multicomponent microbial inoculants for pathogen control and plant growth promotion. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40, 162. doi: doi:10.1007/s11274-024-03965-5
  148. Kredics L., Manczinger L., Antal Z., Pénzes Z., Szekeres A., Kevei F.. (2004). In vitro water activity and pH dependence of mycelial growth and extracellular enzyme activities of Trichoderma strains with biocontrol potential. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96, 491 – 498. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02167.x
  149. Kubiak A., Wolna-Maruwka A., Pilarska A. A., Niewiadomska A., Piotrowska-Cyplik A. (2023). Fungi of the Trichoderma genus: Future perspectives of benefits in sustainable agriculture. Appl. Sci. 13, 6434. doi: doi:10.3390/app13116434
  150. Kumar V. R., Kumar A. (2024). Pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. affecting crops plants: A review. LS Int. J. Life. Sci. 13, 165 – 177. doi: doi:10.5958/2319-1198.2024.00012.X
  151. Kumari R., Kumar V., Arukha A. P., Rabbee M. F., Ameen F., Koul B. (2024). Screening of the biocontrol efficacy of potent Trichoderma strains against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Sclerotium rolfsii causing wilt and collar rot in chickpea. Microorganisms 12, 1280. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms12071280
  152. Kumari R., Kumar V., Koul B., Farah M. A., Mishra A. K. (2025). Synergistic effects of Trichoderma and biochar on the biocontrol of two soil-borne phytopathogens in chickpeas. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1583114. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1583114
  153. Kuzmanovska B., Rusevski R., Jankulovska M., Oreshkovikj K. B. (2018). Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma harzianum against genetically diverse Botrytis cinerea isolates. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 78, 391 – 400. doi: doi:10.4067/S0718-58392018000300391
  154. Lahlali R., Ezrari S., Radouane N., Kenfaoui J., Esmaeel Q., El Hamss H.. (2022). Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms 10, 596. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030596
  155. Lan Y., Yan Z., Duan T. (2023). Luobuma leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria tenuissima in China. J. Fungi 9, 1062. doi: doi:10.3390/jof9111062
  156. Lawrence C. B., Mitchell T. K., Craven K. D., Cramer R. A., Kim K.-H. (2008). At death’s door: Alternaria pathogenicity mechanisms. Plant Pathol. J. 24, 101 – 111. doi: doi:10.5423/PPJ.2008.24.2.101
  157. Li Y. X., Dong X. F., Yang A. L., Zhang H. B. (2022 a). Diversity and pathogenicity of Alternaria species associated with the invasive plant Ageratina adenophora and local plants. PeerJ 10, e13012. doi: doi:10.7717/peerj.13012
  158. Li N., Kim K.-T., Schlagnhaufer C., Kang S. (2024 a). Multifaceted effects of volatile organic compounds released by Fusarium oxysporum on Trichoderma biocontrol agents. Biol. Control 191, 105473. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105473
  159. Li M. F., Li G. H., Zhang K. Q. (2019). Non-volatile metabolites from Trichoderma spp. Metabolites 9, 58. doi: doi:10.3390/metabo9030058
  160. Li J., Phookamsak R., Jiang H., Bhat D. J., Camporesi E., Lumyong S.. (2022 b). Additions to the inventory of the genus Alternaria section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy. J. Fungi 8, 898. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8090898
  161. Li W., Wang X., Jiang Y., Cui S., Hu J., Wei Y.. (2024 b). Volatile organic compounds produced by co-culture of Burkholderia Vietnamiensis B418 with Trichoderma harzianum T11-W exhibits improved antagonistic activities against fungal phytopathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 11097. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms252011097
  162. Li Y., Zhang D., Xu W., Wu Z., Guo M., Cao A. (2011). Alternaria tenuissima causing leaf spot and fruit rot on pepper (Capsicum annuum): First report in China. New Dis. Rep. 24, 3. doi: doi:10.5197/j.2044-0588.2011.024.003
  163. Liu L., Chen F., Chen S., Fang W., Liu Y., Guan Z. (2021). Dual species dynamic transcripts reveal the interaction mechanisms between Chrysanthemum morifolium and Alternaria alternata. BMC Genomics 22, 523. doi: doi:10.1186/s12864-021-07709-9
  164. Liu S., Dai L., Qu G., Lu X., Pan H., Fu X.. (2025). Integrative transcriptome and WGCNA analysis reveal key genes mainly in response to Alternaria alternata in Populus simonii × P. nigra. Front. Plant Sci. 16, 1540718. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1540718
  165. Liu Y., He P., He P., Munir S., Ahmed A., Wu Y.. (2022). Potential biocontrol efficiency of Trichoderma species against oomycete pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 13, 974024. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.974024
  166. Llanos-Gómez K. J., Aime M. C., Rascón J., Ananco-Ahuananchi O., Huaman-Pilco J., Oliva-Cruz S. M.. (2026). Yeasts from the Peruvian native cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) phyllosphere and their biocontrol potential against Moniliophthora roreri. Mycol. Prog. 25, 14. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-026-02124-4
  167. Løvschall K. B., Velasquez S. T. R., Kowalska B., Ptaszek M., Jarecka A., Szczech M.. (2024). Enhancing stability and efficacy of Trichoderma biocontrol agents through layer-by-layer encapsulation for sustainable plant protection. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 8, 2300409. doi: doi:10.1002/adsu.202300409
  168. Ma H., Zhang B., Gai Y., Sun X., Chung K.-R., Li H. (2019). Cell-wall-degrading enzymes required for virulence in the host selective toxin-producing necrotroph Alternaria alternata of citrus. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2514. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02514
  169. Macioszek V. K., Jęcz T., Ciereszko I., Kononowicz A. K. (2023). Jasmonic acid as a mediator in plant response to necrotrophic fungi. Cells 12, 1027. doi: doi:10.3390/cells12071027
  170. Mandal S., Rajarammohan S., Kaur J. (2019). ROS accumulation and associated cell death mediates susceptibility to Alternaria brassicae in Arabidopsis accessions. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 107, 51 – 59. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2019.06.001
  171. Manzar N., Kashyap A. S., Goutam R. S., Rajawat M. V. S., Sharma P. K., Sharma S. K.. (2022). Trichoderma: Advent of versatile biocontrol agent, its secrets and insights into mechanism of biocontrol potential. Sustainability 14, 12786. doi: doi:10.3390/su141912786
  172. Martinez Y., Ribera J., Schwarze F. W. M. R., De France K. (2023). Biotechnological development of Trichoderma-based formulations for biological control. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 107, 5595 – 5612. doi: doi:10.1007/s00253-023-12687-x
  173. Meena M., Gupta S. K., Swapnil P., Zehra A., Dubey M. K., Upadhyay R. S. (2017). Alternaria toxins: Potential virulence factors and genes related to pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1451. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01451
  174. Meena M., Samal S. (2019). Alternaria host-specific (HSTs) toxins: An overview of chemical characterization, target sites, regulation and their toxic effects. Toxicol. Rep. 6, 745 – 758. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.06.021
  175. Mehmood N., Riaz A., Ghuffar S., Anwaar S., Jabeen N., Shaheen I.. (2025). Epidemiology and genetic characterization of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot in Fragaria × ananassa. Fungal Biol. 129, 101589. doi: doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2025.101589
  176. Metwally R. A., Abdelhameed R. E., Khaliel M. M. (2026). Mechanistic insights into Trichoderma asperellum-mediated biocontrol of leaf spot disease and growth promotion in lettuce. Plant Growth Regul. 106, 1 – 21. doi: doi:10.1007/s10725-025-01419-y
  177. Metz N., Hausladen H. (2022). Trichoderma spp. as potential biological control agent against Alternaria solani in potato. Biol. Control 166, 104820. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104820
  178. Minchev Z., Kostenko O., Soler R., Pozo M. J. (2021). Microbial consortia for effective biocontrol of root and foliar diseases in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 756368. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.756368
  179. Miranda-Apodaca J., Artetxe U., Aguado I., Martin-Souto L., Ramirez-Garcia A., Lacuesta M.. (2023). Stress response to climate change and postharvest handling in two differently pigmented lettuce genotypes: Impact on Alternaria alternata invasion and mycotoxin production. Plants 12, 1304. doi: doi:10.3390/plants12061304
  180. Mishra S., Roychowdhury R., Ray S., Hada A., Kumar A., Sarker U.. (2024). Salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity against biotic stresses: An insight on molecular components and signaling mechanism. Plant Stress 11, 100427. doi: doi:10.1016/j.stress.2024.100427
  181. Mishu N. J., Hasan M. R., Islam S. M. N., Nayeema J., Hossain M. M. (2025). Additive effects of Trichoderma isolates for enhancing growth, suppressing southern blight and modulating plant defense enzymes in tomato. PloS One 20, e0329368. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329368
  182. Moënne-Loccoz Y., Mavingui P., Combes C., Normand P., Steinberg C. (2014). “Microorganisms and biotic interactions,” in Environmental Microbiology: Fundamentals and Applications, eds. J. C. Bertrand, P. Caumette, P. Lebaron, R. Matheron, P. Normand, and T. Sime-Ngando (Dordrecht: Springer), 395 -444.
  183. Morath S. U., Hung R., Bennett J. W. (2012). Fungal volatile organic compounds: A review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol. Rev. 26, 73 – 83. doi: doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2012.07.001
  184. Moreno-Ruiz D., Lichius A., Turrà D., Di Pietro A., Zeilinger S. (2020). Chemotropism assays for plant symbiosis and mycoparasitism related compound screening in Trichoderma atroviride. Front. Microbiol. 11, 601251. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.601251
  185. Moropana T. J., Jansen van Rensburg E. L., Makulana L., Phasha N. N. (2024). Screening Aspergillus flavus, Talaromyces purpureogenus, and Trichoderma koningiopsis for plant-growth-promoting traits: A study on phosphate solubilization, IAA production, and siderophore synthesis. J. Fungi 10, 811. doi: doi:10.3390/jof10120811
  186. Moussa S., Iasur Kruh L. (2025). Balancing nature and nurture: The role of biocontrol agents in shaping plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Microorganisms 13, 323. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms13020323
  187. Moya P. A., Girotti J. R., Toledo A. V., Sisterna M. N. (2018). Antifungal activity of Trichoderma VOCs against Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. J. Plant Prot. Res. 58, 45 – 53. doi: doi:10.24425/119115
  188. Mukherjee P., Mendoza-Mendoza A., Zeilinger S., Horwitz B. A. (2022). Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases. Fungal Biol. Rev. 39, 15 – 33. doi: doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.004
  189. Mukherjee M., Mukherjee P. K., Horwitz B. A., Zachow C., Berg G., Zeilinger S. (2012). Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions: Advances in genetics of biological control. Indian J. Microbiol. 52, 522 – 529. doi: doi:10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5
  190. Mukhopadhyay R., Kumar D. (2020). Trichoderma: A beneficial antifungal agent and insights into its mechanism of biocontrol potential. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 30, Article 133. doi: doi:10.1186/s41938-020-00333-x
  191. Munir S., Shahzad A. N., Qureshi M. K. (2020). Acuities into tolerance mechanisms via different bioassay during Brassicaceae–Alternaria brassicicola interaction and its impact on yield. PloS One 15, e0242545. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242545
  192. Munir S., Shahzad A. N., Rai A., Petrov V., Gechev T., Shokat S.. (2025). Reactive oxygen species production and signal transduction in response to stress triggered by Alternaria elicitors in Brassicaceae. Plant Mol. Biol. 115, 113. doi: doi:10.1007/s11103-025-01639-w
  193. Nagda A., Meena M. (2025). Diversity, pathogenicity, and mycotoxin profiling of Alternaria species infecting potato in India. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 438. doi: doi:10.1007/s11274-025-04667-2
  194. Nagda A., Meena M. (2026). Comprehensive profiling of potato responses to Alternaria alternata and its toxins (TeA and AOH): Ultrastructural, biochemical and multivariate insights. BMC Plant Biol. 26, 194. doi: doi:10.1186/s12870-025-07994-6
  195. Naglot A., Goswami S., Rahman I., Shrimali D. D., Yadav K. K., Gupta V. K.. (2015). Antagonistic potential of native Trichoderma viride strain against potent tea fungal pathogens in North East India. Plant Pathol. J. 31, 278 – 289. doi: doi:10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2015.0004
  196. Nazla K., Prismantoro D., Awal M. A., Jefferson T. A., Syaputri Y., Azzahra R. S. N.. (2026). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for controlling rice diseases: What is known and what is next ? J. Agric. Food Res. 27, 102834. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102834
  197. Newman T. E., Derbyshire M. C. (2020). The evolutionary and molecular features of broad host-range necrotrophy in plant pathogenic fungi. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 591733. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.591733
  198. Nguyen H.-T., Pham T.-T., Nguyen P.-T., Dinh N-C-G., Le M.-T., Nguyen T.-D.. (2025). Microbial biocontrol in agriculture: From mechanistic understanding to field application. Discover Plants 2, 334. doi: doi:10.1007/s44372-025-00421-y
  199. Nielsen J. C., Prigent S., Grijseels S., Workman M., Ji B., Nielsen J. (2019). Comparative transcriptome analysis shows conserved metabolic regulation during production of secondary metabolites in filamentous fungi. mSystems 4, e00012-19. doi: doi:10.1128/mSystems.00012-19
  200. Nunes S. O. P., Lacerda-Junior G. V., Mascarin G. M., Guimarães R. A., Medeiros F. H. V., Arthurs S.. (2024). Microbial consortia of biological products: Do they have a future ? Biol. Control 188, 105439. doi: doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105439
  201. Nysanth N. S., Sivapriya S. L., Natarajan C., Anith K. N. (2022). Novel in vitro methods for simultaneous screening of two antagonistic bacteria against multiple fungal phytopathogens in a single agar plate. 3 Biotech. 12, 140. doi: doi:10.1007/s13205-022-03205-3
  202. Oka K., Akamatsu H., Kodama M., Nakajima H., Kawada T., Otani H. (2005). Host-specific AB-toxin production by germinating spores of Alternaria brassicicola is induced by a host-derived oligosaccharide. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 66, 12 – 19. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.03.005
  203. Olowe O. M., Nicola L., Asemoloye M. D., Akanmu A. O., Sobowale A. A., Babalola O. O. (2022). Characterization and antagonistic potentials of selected rhizosphere Trichoderma species against some Fusarium species. Front. Microbiol. 13, 985874. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.985874
  204. Omann M. R., Lehner S., Escobar Rodríguez C., Brunner K., Zeilinger S. (2012). The seven-transmembrane receptor Gpr1 governs processes relevant for the antagonistic interaction of Trichoderma atroviride with its host. Microbiology 158, 107 – 118. doi: doi:10.1099/mic.0.052035-0
  205. Ons L., Bylemans D., Thevissen K., Cammue B. P. A. (2020). Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 8, 1930. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121930
  206. Ost K. J., Student M., Cord-Landwehr S., Moerschbacher B. M., Ram A. F. J., Dirks-Hofmeister M. E. (2025). Cell walls of filamentous fungi: Challenges and opportunities for biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 109, 125. doi: doi:10.1007/s00253-025-13512-3
  207. Pacheco-Trejo J., Aquino-Torres E., Reyes-Santamaría M. I., Islas-Pelcastre M., Pérez-Ríos S. R., Madariaga-Navarrete A.. (2022). Plant defensive responses triggered by Trichoderma spp. as tools to face stressful conditions. Horticulturae 8, 1181. doi: doi:10.3390/horticulturae8121181
  208. Pereira L. S., Salomón A. L., Bermudez V. A. C., Rius S. P. (2025). Bioactive proteins from Trichoderma for the control of Fusarium: Evaluation of antagonist efficacy and potential for agronomic application. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 67, 103628. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103628
  209. Philip B., Behiry S. I., Salem M. Z. M., Amer M. A., El-Samra I. A., Abdelkhalek A.. (2024). Trichoderma afroharzianum TRI07 metabolites inhibit Alternaria alternata growth and induce tomato defense-related enzymes. Sci. Rep. 14, 1874. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52301-2
  210. Pozo M. I., Herrero B., Martín-García J., Santamaría Ó., Poveda J. (2024). Evaluating potential side effects of Trichoderma as biocontrol agent: A two-edges sword ? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 41, 100566. doi: doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2024.100566
  211. Prapagdee B., Kuekulvong C., Mongkolsuk S. (2008). Antifungal potential of extracellular metabolites produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus against phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 4, 330 – 337. doi: doi:10.7150/ijbs.4.330
  212. Prechsl U. E., Rizzoli W., Marschall K., Wubs E. R. J. (2023). Fungicide-free management of Alternaria leaf blotch and fruit spot on apple indicates Alternaria spp. as secondary colonizer. Sci. Rep. 13, 8431. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35448-2
  213. Rafiei V., Vélëz H., Tzelepis G. (2021). The role of glycoside hydrolases in phytopathogenic fungi and oomycetes virulence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9359. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms22179359
  214. Rahman M., Borah S. M., Borah P. K., Bora P., Sarmah B. K., Lal M. K.. (2023). Deciphering the antimicrobial activity of multifaceted rhizospheric biocontrol agents of solanaceous crops viz. Trichoderma harzianum MC2, and Trichoderma harzianum NBG. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1141506. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1141506
  215. Rahman M. U., Zhong X., Uzair M., Fan B. (2024). Application of fungi as biological control strategies for nematode management in horticultural crops. Phytopathol. Res. 6, Article 38. doi: doi:10.1186/s42483-024-00257-6
  216. Rahnama K., Oghaz N. A., Derakhshan N., Jayawardena R. S. (2025). Antifungal metabolite profiling and inhibition assessment of Trichoderma-derived compounds during initial spore germination stage against postharvest pathogens. Stud. Fungi 10, e015. doi: doi:10.48130/sif-0025-0015
  217. Raju Y., Punamalai G. (2025). A review on the overview of Trichoderma – A versatile biocontrol agent and plant growth promotor. Front. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 19 – 25. doi: doi:10.11648/j.fem.20251102.11
  218. Rao K. L. M., Raju K. S., Ravisankar H. (2016). Cultural conditions on the production of extracellular enzymes by Trichoderma isolates from tobacco rhizosphere. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47, 25 – 32. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.007
  219. Rashmi S., Maurya S., Upadhyay R. S. (2016). The improvement of competitive saprophytic capabilities of Trichoderma species through the use of chemical mutagens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47, 10 – 17. doi: doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.003
  220. Rasiukevičiūtė N., Bunevičius V., Bankina B. (2025). Fungal diseases integrated management in agriculture. Agriculture 15, 844. doi: doi:10.3390/agriculture15080844
  221. Ren X., Fan L., Li G., Lyagin I. V., Zhang B., Ning M.. (2025). Interaction of Trichoderma species with Fusarium graminearum growth and its trichothecene biosynthesis as further contribution in selection of potential biocontrol agents. J. Fungi 11, 521. doi: doi:10.3390/jof11070521
  222. Rezaee Danesh Y., Mulet J. M., Porcel R. (2025). Bridging microbial biocontrol and phytochemical biopesticides: Synergistic approaches for sustainable crop protection. Plants 14, 3453. doi: doi:10.3390/plants14223453
  223. Ribeiro M. S., de Paula R. G., Voltan A. R., de Castro R. G., Carraro C. B., de Assis L. J.. (2019). Endo-β-1,3-glucanase (GH16 family) from Trichoderma harzianum participates in cell wall biogenesis but is not essential for antagonism against plant pathogens. Biomolecules 9, 781. doi: doi:10.3390/biom9120781
  224. Rimkus A., Namina A., Dzierkale M. T., Grigs O., Senkovs M., Larsson S. (2023). Impact of growth conditions on the viability of Trichoderma asperellum during storage. Microorganisms 11, 1084. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms11041084
  225. Riseh R. S., Fathi F., Vazvani M. G., Tarkka M. T. (2025). Plant colonization by biocontrol bacteria and improved plant health: A review. Front. Biosci. 30, 23223. doi: doi:10.31083/FBL23223
  226. Roychowdhury R., Mishra S., Anand G., Dalal D., Gupta R., Kumar A.. (2024). Decoding the molecular mechanism underlying salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity: an integrated overview from its biosynthesis to the mode of action. Physiol. Plant 176, e14399. doi: doi:10.1111/ppl.14399
  227. Şesan T. E., Oancea A. O., Ştefan L. M., Mănoiu V. S., Ghiurea M., Răut I.. (2020). Effects of foliar treatment with a Trichoderma plant biostimulant consortium on Passiflora caerulea L. yield and quality. Microorganisms 8, 123. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms8010123
  228. Saadaoui M., Faize M., Bonhomme L., Benyoussef N. O., Kharrat M., Chaar H.. (2023). Assessment of Tunisian Trichoderma isolates on wheat seed germination, seedling growth and Fusarium seedling blight suppression. Microorganisms 11, 1512. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms11061512
  229. Safeer A. A., Kleijburg F. E. L., Wösten H. A. B., Baldus M. (2025). Solid-state NMR spectroscopy reveals unique properties of Trichoderma harzianum cell wall components. Cell Surf. 14, 100156. doi: doi:10.1016/j.tcsw.2025.100156
  230. Saini S., Kumar H., Wati L., Raj K., Kumar P., Saini A. K. (2025). Deciphering the multifaceted mechanism of Trichoderma asperellum ORF 2 parasitism against Alternaria porri in confronting onion purple blotch. J. Plant Pathol. 108, 1 – 15. doi: doi:10.1007/s42161-025-01930-1
  231. Sakai A., Yamagata H., Naito K., Yoshioka M., Tominaga T., Ifuku S.. (2024). Root colonization by Trichoderma atroviride triggers induced systemic resistance primarily independent of the chitin-mediated signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Microbes Environments 39, ME24038. doi: doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME24038
  232. Salotti I., Giorni P., Battilani P. (2024). Biology, ecology, and epidemiology of Alternaria species affecting tomato: Ground information for the development of a predictive model. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1430965
  233. Santillan-Culquimboz H. W., Leiva S. T., Muñoz-Salas M. N., Meza-Maicelo W., Lozano-Isla F., Oliva-Cruz M.. (2025). Ecology and functions of Trichoderma in coffee and cocoa agroecosystems: Bibliometric and systematic insights for sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1717484. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1717484
  234. Saravanakumar K., Li Y., Yu C., Wang Q. Q., Wang M., Sun J.. (2017). Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on maize rhizosphere microbiome and biocontrol of Fusarium stalk rot. Sci. Rep. 7, 1771. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01680-w
  235. Schmey T., Tominello-Ramirez C. S., Brune C., Stam R. (2024). Alternaria diseases on potato and tomato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 25, e13435. doi: doi:10.1111/mpp.13435
  236. Schulz-Bohm K., Zweers H., de Boer W., Garbeva P. (2015). A fragrant neighborhood: Volatile mediated bacterial interactions in soil. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1212. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01212
  237. Shahriar S. A., Islam M. N., Chun C. N. W., Kaur P., Rahim M. A., Islam M. M.. (2022). Microbial metabolomics interaction and ecological challenges of Trichoderma species as biocontrol inoculant in crop rhizosphere. Agronomy 12, 900. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy12040900
  238. Shanmugaraj C., Kamil D., Parimalan R., Singh P. K., Shashank P. R., Iquebal M. A.. (2024). Deciphering the defense response in tomato against Sclerotium rolfsii by Trichoderma asperellum strain A10 through gene expression analysis. 3 Biotech. 14, 210. doi: doi:10.1007/s13205-024-04040-4
  239. Shao Y., Gu S., Peng H., Zhang L., Li S., Berendsen R. L.. (2025). Synergic interactions between Trichoderma and the soil microbiomes improve plant iron availability and growth. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11, 56. doi: doi:10.1038/s41522-025-00684-z
  240. Sharma S., Sharma M., Nughal J., Sharma A. (2024). Efficacy of Trichoderma strains as biotic inducers against Alternaria leaf spot of cauliflower. Int. J. Bioresour. Stress Manage. 15, 1 – 8. doi: doi:10.23910/1.2024.5410
  241. Shoresh M., Yedidia I., Chet I. (2005). Involvement of jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathway in the systemic resistance induced in cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum T203. Phytopathology 95, 76 – 84. doi: doi:10.1094/PHYTO-95-0076
  242. Silva R. N., Monteiro V. N., Steindorff A. S., Gomes E. V., Noronha E. F., Ulhoa C. J.. (2019). Trichoderma–pathogen–plant interaction: Advances in molecular biology and biotechnological applications. Fungal Biol. Rev. 33, 85 – 96. doi: doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2019.06.010
  243. Singh Y., Nair A. M., Verma P. K. (2021). Surviving the odds: From perception to survival of fungal phytopathogens under host-generated oxidative burst. Plant Commun. 2, 100142. doi: doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100142
  244. Singh S., Singh A. K., Pradhan B., Tripathi S., Kumar K. S., Chand S.. (2024). Harnessing Trichoderma mycoparasitism as a tool in the management of soil dwelling plant pathogens. Microb. Ecol. 87, 158. doi: doi:10.1007/s00248-024-02458-0
  245. Slathia S., Sharma Y. P., Hakla H. R., Urfan M., Yadav N. S., Pal S. (2021). Post-harvest management of Alternaria-induced rot in tomato fruits with essential oil of Zanthoxylum armatum. Front. Sustain. Food. Syst. 5, 679830. doi: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.679830
  246. Slimani N., Arraouadi S., Hajlaoui H., Borgi M. A., Boughattas N. E. H., De Feo V.. (2023). The impact of greenhouse and field growth conditions on Chenopodium quinoa Willd. accessions’ response to salt stress: A comparative approach. Agronomy 13, 2303. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy13092303
  247. Smolińska U., Kowalska B. (2018). Biological control of the soil-borne fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum – a review. J. Plant Pathol. 100, 1 – 12. doi: doi:10.1007/s42161-018-0023-0
  248. Sood M., Kapoor D., Kumar V., Sheteiwy M. S., Ramakrishnan M., Landi M.. (2020). Trichoderma: The “secrets” of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants 9, 762. doi: doi:10.3390/plants9060762
  249. Stange P., Kersting J., Sivaprakasam Padmanaban P. B., Schnitzler J.-P., Rosenkranz M., Karl T.. (2024 a). The decision for or against mycoparasitic attack by Trichoderma spp. is taken already at a distance in a prey-specific manner and benefits plant-beneficial interactions. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 11, 14. doi: doi:10.1186/s40694-024-00183-4
  250. Stange A., Kopecky C., Grünbacher A., Atanasova L., Zeilinger S. (2024 b). Lifestyle-specific responses of Trichoderma spp. in mycoparasitic interactions. bioRxiv, 1 – 46. doi: doi:10.1101/2024.04.17.589723
  251. Steindorff A. S., Ramada M. H. S., Coelho A. S. G., Miller R. N. G., Pappas Júnior G. J., Ulhoa C. J.. (2014). Identification of mycoparasitism-related genes against the phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum through transcriptome and expression profile analysis in Trichoderma harzianum. BMC Genomics 15, 204. doi: doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-204
  252. Stracquadanio C., Quiles J. M., Meca G., Cacciola S. O. (2020). Antifungal activity of bioactive metabolites produced by Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma atroviride in liquid medium. J. Fungi 6, 263. doi: doi:10.3390/jof6040263
  253. Stummer B. E., Zhang X., Moghaddam M. J., Yang H., Harvey P. R. (2024). Wheat rhizosphere dynamics of Trichoderma gamsii A5MH and suppression of a Pythium root rot–Fusarium crown rot disease complex over two consecutive cropping seasons. J. Appl. Microbiol. 135, lxae069. doi: doi:10.1093/jambio/lxae069
  254. Sun W., Zhang Y., Hua L. (2025). Genomic and epigenomic insights into Trichoderma–plant interactions. Phytopathol. Res. 7, 69. doi: doi:10.1186/s42483-025-00359-9
  255. Surma S., H. S. M. M., Dar M. S., Padder B. A., Khan I., Mushtaq K.. (2025). Morpho-cultural and molecular characterization of Trichoderma species from the northwestern Himalayan apple rhizosphere of India. Sci. Rep. 15, 26320. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12086-4
  256. Taylor J. T., Harting R., Shalaby S., Kenerley C. M., Braus G. H., Horwitz B. A. (2022). Adhesion as a focus in Trichoderma-root interactions. J. Fungi 8, 372. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8040372
  257. Thomma B. P. H. J. (2003). Alternaria spp.: From general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4, 225 – 236. doi: doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00173.x
  258. Triveni S., Prasanna R., Shukla L., Saxena A. K. (2013). Evaluating the biochemical traits of novel Trichoderma-based biofilms for use as plant growth-promoting inoculants. Ann. Microbiol. 63, 1147 – 1156. doi: doi:10.1007/s13213-012-0573-x
  259. Tsuge T., Harimoto Y., Akimitsu K., Ohtani K., Kodama M., Akagi Y.. (2013). Host-selective toxins produced by the plant pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 44 – 66. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00350.x
  260. Tyśkiewicz R., Nowak A., Ozimek E., Jaroszuk-Ściseł J. (2022). Trichoderma: The current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 2329. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms23042329
  261. Tyagi A., Lama Tamang T., Kashtoh H., Mir R. A., Mir Z. A., Manzoor S.. (2024). A review on biocontrol agents as sustainable approach for crop disease management: Applications, production, and future perspectives. Horticulturae 10, 805. doi: doi:10.3390/horticulturae10080805
  262. Vargas-Gasca F., Pola-Sánchez E., García-Lartigue A. V., Gomez-Vargas A. D., Cruz-Morales P., Calheiros de Carvalho A.. (2026). Genomic and metabolomic insights into Trichoderma harzianum T9, a resilient biocontrol fungus from arid environments. Sci. Rep. 16, 3442. doi: doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33347-2
  263. Vieira P. M., Coelho A. S., Steindorff A. S., de Siqueira S. J., Silva R. N., Ulhoa C. J. (2013). Identification of differentially expressed genes from Trichoderma harzianum during growth on cell wall of Fusarium solani as a tool for biotechnological application. BMC Genomics 14, 177. doi: doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-177
  264. Villavicencio-Vásquez M., Espinoza-Lozano F., Espinoza-Lozano L., Coronel-León J. (2025). Biological control agents: mechanisms of action, selection, formulation and challenges in agriculture. Front. Agron. 7, 1578915. doi: doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1578915
  265. Vindas-Reyes E., Chacón-Cerdas R., Rivera-Méndez W. (2024). Trichoderma production and encapsulation methods for agricultural applications. AgriEngineering 6, 2366 – 2384. doi: doi:10.3390/agriengineering6030138
  266. Vinogradova S. A., Kiselev K. V., Suprun A. R. (2026). An overview of the Alternaria genus: Ecology, pathogenicity and importance for agriculture and human health. J. Fungi 12, 64. doi: doi:10.3390/jof12010064
  267. Vultaggio L., Allevato E., Consentino B. B., Bellitto P., Napoli S., Cannata C.. (2024). Joint action of Trichoderma atroviride and a vegetal derived-protein hydrolysate improves performances of woodland strawberry in Italy. Horticulturae 10, 459. doi: doi:10.3390/horticulturae10050459
  268. Wadhwa K., Kapoor N., Kaur H., Abu-Seer E. A., Tariq M., Siddiqui S.. (2024). A comprehensive review of the diversity of fungal secondary metabolites and their emerging applications in healthcare and environment. Mycobiology 52, 335 – 387. doi: doi:10.1080/12298093.2024.2416736
  269. Wang Y., Chen H., Ma L., Gong M., Wu Y., Bao D.. (2022 c). Use of CRISPR-Cas tools to engineer Trichoderma species. Microb. Biotechnol. 15, 2521 – 2532. doi: doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14126
  270. Wang H., Guo Y., Luo Z., Gao L., Li R., Zhang Y.. (2022 b). Recent advances in Alternaria phytotoxins: A review of their occurrence, structure, bioactivity, and biosynthesis. J. Fungi 8, 168. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8020168
  271. Wang Y., Li X., Fan B., Zhu C., Chen Z. (2021). Regulation and function of defense-related callose deposition in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2393. doi: doi:10.3390/ijms22052393
  272. Wang J., Mu H., Liu S., Qi S., Mou S. (2024). Effects of Trichoderma harzianum on growth and rhizosphere microbial community of continuous cropping Lagenaria siceraria. Microorganisms 12, 1987. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms12101987
  273. Wang Z., Wu M., Liao Q., Wang Y., Sui Y., Gong C. (2025). Current status and future trends of eco-friendly management of postharvest fungal decays in tomato fruit. NPJ Sci. Food 9, 104. doi: doi:10.1038/s41538-025-00477-w
  274. Wang C., Zhang D., Cheng J., Zhao D., Pan Y., Li Q.. (2022 a). Identification of effector CEP112 that promotes the infection of Alternaria solani. BMC Plant Biol. 22, 466. doi: doi:10.1186/s12870-022-03845-w
  275. Whitaker B. K., Bakker M. G. (2019). Bacterial endophyte antagonism toward a fungal pathogen in vitro does not predict protection in live plant tissue. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, fiy237. doi: doi:10.1093/femsec/fiy237
  276. Widadie F., Wulandari E., Lestari R. D. (2024). Business models for engaging smallholder farmers in high-value markets: Empirical evidence from vegetable value chains. Agric. Resour. Econ. Int. Sci. e-J. 10, 179 – 202. doi: doi:10.51599/are.2024.10.04.08
  277. Win T. T., Bo B., Khan S., Fu P. (2026). Ecological dominance, functional roles, and biosafety of Trichoderma spp. as a biofertilizer fungus. Front. Fungal Biol. 6, 1641004. doi: doi:10.3389/ffunb.2025.1641004
  278. Woo S. L., Hermosa R., Lorito M., Monte E. (2023). Trichoderma: A multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 312 – 326. doi: doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5
  279. Wu Z., Liu L., Luo W., Yan R., Wang L., Shi R.. (2025). Trichoderma asperellum 2-X-3-3 as a sustainable biocontrol alternative to fungicides for postharvest pear diseases. Sci. Hortic. 341, Article 114293. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2025.02140
  280. Xiao S., Wang J., Bai Z., Pan Y., Li Q., Zhao D.. (2024). Alternaria solani effectors AsCEP19 and AsCEP20 reveal novel functions in pathogenicity and conidiogenesis. Microbiol. Spectr. 12, e04214-23. doi: doi:10.1128/spectrum.04214-23
  281. Xu D., Xue M., Shen Z., Jia X., Hou X., Lai D.. (2021). Phytotoxic secondary metabolites from fungi. Toxins 13, 261. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins13040261
  282. Xu X., Yang C., Xu Z., Jiao C., Yang X., Wang Y.. (2026). Trichoderma asperellum 2-X-3-3 as a sustainable biocontrol alternative to fungicides for postharvest pear diseases. Food Microbiol. 134, 104934. doi: doi:10.1016/j.fm.2025.104934
  283. Yaakoub H., Mina S., Calenda A., Bouchara J. P., Papon N. (2022). Oxidative stress response pathways in fungi. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 333. doi: doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04353-8
  284. Yao X., Guo H., Zhang K., Zhao M., Ruan J., Chen J. (2023). Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1160551. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1160551
  285. Yassin M. T., Mostafa A. A. F., Al-Askar A. A. (2022). In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. against fungal pathogens causing black point disease of wheat. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 16, 57 – 65. doi: doi:10.1080/16583655.2022.2029327
  286. Yendyo S., G. C. R., Pandey B. R. (2017). Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis for biological control of Ralstonia wilt of tomato. F1000Research 6, 2028. doi: doi:10.12688/f1000research.12448.3
  287. Yessimseitova A., Abdrakhmanova A., Tokbergenova Z., Abdullaeva B., Muranets A., Nurtaza A.. (2025). Identification and characterization of Alternaria species causing early blight on tomato in Kazakhstan. Agronomy 15, 1251. doi: doi:10.3390/agronomy15051251
  288. You Y., Hu Q., Liu N., Xu C., Lu S., Xu T.. (2023). Metabolite analysis of Alternaria mycotoxins by LC–MS/MS and multiple tools. Molecules 28, 3258. doi: doi:10.3390/molecules28073258
  289. Zeilinger S., Omann M. (2007). Trichoderma biocontrol: Signal transduction pathways involved in host sensing and mycoparasitism. Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. 1, 227 – 234. doi: doi:10.4137/grsb.s397
  290. Zhan Q., Liu L., Li W., Lu J., Jiang J., Chen F.. (2025). Toxin production by Alternaria alternata in black spot disease of Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Fubai’: Accumulation of altenuene and tenuazonic acid in flowers. Toxins 17, 181. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins17040181
  291. Zhang L., Bao L., Li S., Liu Y., Liu H. (2024 a). Corrigendum: Active substances of myxobacteria against plant diseases and their action mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1392109. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1392109
  292. Zhang Z., Chen Y., Li B., Chen T., Tian S. (2020). Reactive oxygen species: A generalist in regulating development and pathogenicity of phytopathogenic fungi. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 3344 – 3349. doi: doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.024
  293. Zhang S., Gan Y., Xu B. (2016). Application of plant-growth-promoting fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1405. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01405
  294. Zhang D., He J.-Y., Haddadi P., Zhu J.-H., Yang Z.-H., Ma L. (2018). Genome sequence of the potato pathogenic fungus Alternaria solani HWC-168 reveals clues for its conidiation and virulence. BMC Microbiol. 18, 176. doi: doi:10.1186/s12866-018-1324-3
  295. Zhang J., Li K., Sun Y., Yao C., Liu W., Liu H.. (2024 c). An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system based on a multiple sgRNA processing platform in Trichoderma reesei for strain improvement and enzyme production. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 17, 22. doi: doi:10.1186/s13068-024-02468-7
  296. Zhang Y., Lu Y., Jin Z., Li B., Wu L., He Y. (2024 b). Antifungal mechanism of cell-free supernatant produced by Trichoderma virens and its efficacy for the control of pear Valsa canker. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1377683. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1377683
  297. Zhang F., Ma R., Huang Y., Cui Y., Zhou Q., Gu J. (2025). Genome mining of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma afroharzianum unearths a key gene in the biosynthesis of anti-fungal volatile sesquiterpenoids. Catalysts 15, 341. doi: doi:10.3390/catal15040341
  298. Zhang M., Zhang Y., Li Y., Bi Y., Mao R., Yang Y.. (2022 a). Cellular responses required for oxidative stress tolerance of the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria alternata, causal agent of pear black spot. Microorganisms 10, 621. doi: doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030621
  299. Zhang Y.-Q., Zhang S., Sun M.-L., Su H.-N., Li H.-Y., Liu K.. (2022 b). Antibacterial activity of peptaibols from Trichoderma longibrachiatum SMF2 against gram-negative Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, the causal agent of bacterial leaf blight on rice. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1034779. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034779
  300. Zhao L., Wang J., Zhang H., Wang P., Wang C., Zhou Y.. (2023). Inhibitory effect of carvacrol against Alternaria alternata causing goji fruit rot by disrupting the integrity and composition of cell wall. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1139749. doi: doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1139749
  301. Zheng H., Qiao M., Lv Y., Du X., Zhang K.-Q., Yu Z. (2021). New species of Trichoderma isolated as endophytes and saprobes from Southwest China. J. Fungi 7, 467. doi: doi:10.3390/jof7060467
  302. Zin N. A., Badaluddin N. A. (2020). Biological functions of Trichoderma spp. for agriculture applications. Ann. Agric. Sci. 65, 168 – 178. doi: doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2020.09.003

Citation

Khalido, R., et al. (2026). Mechanisms of action and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma against Alternaria in horticultural crops: a review. Frontiers in Fungal Biology, Volume 7. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
7 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Khalido, Rossiana, Prismantoro, Jefferson, Albert, Abdullah, Irawan, Miranti, Harsonowati, Joshi and Doni.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Nia Rossiana; Febri Doni

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0