Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Fungal Biology ·

Volume 7 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2026.1940464

Unearthing a fungal giant: Dianjunaceae fam. nov., a novel Paleocene lineage of Xylariales harboring Dianjunus rex gen. et sp. nov

  • Jing Song1,2
  • Zhuyue Yan1
  • Jesús Pérez-Moreno3
  • Fengming Zhang1,4
  • Shimei Yang1
  • Tao Xie1
  • Luofeng Su1
  • Jianwei Liu1
  • Yanliang Wang1
  • Dong Liu1
  • Zhenyan Yang1
  • Chengmo Yang1
  • Wei Liu1,4
  • Xiaofei Shi1,4
  • Shanping Wan5
  • Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon2
  • Dongqin Dai6
  • Indunil C. Senanayake1*corresponding author
  • Fuqiang Yu1*corresponding author
  1. 1Yunnan Key Laboratory for Fungal Diversity and Green Development and Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia, Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  2. 2Departments of Plant Pathology and Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  3. 3Campus Montecillo, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco de Mora, Mexico
  4. 4Key Laboratory of Chemistry in Ethnic Medicinal Resources, School of Ethnic Medicine, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  5. 5College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  6. 6Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization and Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, China
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

During mycological surveys in Yunnan Province, China, specimens of a fungus producing massive, upright stromata up to 50 cm high and individually 2.2 kg in weight were sampled. Through an integrative taxonomic approach combining detailed morphology, multilocus phylogeny [internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU), RNA polymerase II subunit 2 (RPB2), and beta-tubulin (TUB2) ], and phylogenomic analyses, this fungus is proposed as the new species Dianjunus rex gen. et sp. nov., the type of the new family Dianjunaceae (Xylariales). Phylogenetic analyses robustly place Dianjunaceae as a distinct sister clade to Graphostromataceae. Divergence time estimation dates the origin of this family to the early Paleocene (~65 million years ago), coinciding with the period following the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction, when an estimated 75% of all plant and animal species went extinct, and a significant ecological reorganization of life on Earth happened. The stromata of D. rex represent the largest fructifications documented within the Ascomycota, significantly expanding the known morphological range of the Xylariales. The study provides a comprehensive description, including a nodulisporium-like anamorph with periconiella-like branching patterns, and discusses the taxon’s phylogenetic placement and distinctive morphology. This discovery highlights the unexplored fungal diversity in East Asian forests.

Keywords

1 Introduction

The order Xylariales Nannf. comprises a morphologically diverse group of ascomycetous fungi, typically characterized by carbonaceous, darkly pigmented stromata. Taxa within this order occupy varied ecological niches, functioning as endophytes, pathogens, or saprobes (Senanayake et al., 2015). Saprobic members, often wood-associated, are key decomposers of dead plant materials, particularly lignified tissues, and contribute significantly to carbon cycling in forest ecosystems (Ma et al., 2022). Endophytic xylarialean species reside asymptomatically within healthy plant tissues, sometimes shifting to saprobic life mode when host tissues senesce, while others may act as opportunistic plant pathogens under host stress (Cedeño-Sanchez et al., 2023).

Xylariales typically produce perithecial ascomata embedded within stromatic tissues. They are defined by unitunicate asci, frequently possessing a characteristic amyloid or inamyloid apical apparatus, and brown to dark ascospores that often exhibit a germ-slit (Stadler, 2011). While traditional taxonomy has relied on stromatal morphology, perithecial arrangement, and spore characteristics, these traits are often subject to convergence. Contemporary systematics of Xylariales increasingly integrates multi-locus phylogenetic and genome-scale data, leading to substantial revisions of familial and generic boundaries (Wendt et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). Several studies indicated that anamorph morphology in Xylariales fungi served as a better indicator of phylogenetic relationships than teleomorph morphology (Jaklitsch and Voglmayr, 2012; Jaklitsch et al., 2016). The order currently encompasses 16 recognized families (Samarakoon et al., 2016) and allied lineages reflecting considerable lifestyle diversity. Beyond their ecological relevance, Xylariales are notable for their prolific production of secondary metabolites, including pigments and bioactive compounds, and their enzymatic capacity to degrade complex plant polymers. These attributes render them of significant interest for biotechnology, natural product discovery, and studies of plant–microbe interaction (Becker and Stadler, 2021; Franco et al., 2025).

Stromatal morphology within the order varies, including both upright and penzigioid forms (Fournier et al., 2020). The order Xylariales encompasses few species capable of producing large stromata. A paramount example is Engleromyces goetzei P. Henn., which forms large, subglobose stromata on bamboo culms (Whalley et al., 2010). A documented specimen from Kenya comprised two lobes measuring 30 cm in diameter with a mass of approximately 3.2 kg, ranking among the most voluminous individual ascomata recorded in Ascomycota (Gibson and Kimeria, 1962; Whalley et al., 2010). In contrast, species such as Xylaria polymorpha (Pers.) Grev. and X. longipes Nitschke produce clustered, clavate stromata where aggregations, though comprised of modest individual units (5–8 cm height), can exceed 20 cm in total breadth (Rogers, 1979). Squamotubera le-ratii Henn., the only species of the genus, has been reported with stromata around 7 cm height and 5 cm width (Hennings, 1903; Rogers, 1981).

During fungal diversity surveys in Yunnan Province, China, several specimens producing exceptionally large, upright stromata were collected from a tropical rainforest in Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture and from temperate coniferous forests in Kunming and Lufeng Cities. Through integrative approaches combining detailed morphological examination with multilocus phylogenetic reconstruction, taxonomic placement of all specimens was determined.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sample collection and morphological examination

Specimens were collected during the following periods and in the following locations: August to September 2024 in Damaidi Village, Tuanjie Town, Luquan County, Kunming, China; July 2025 in Nanbang Village, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China; and July 2025 in Yipinglang Town, Lufeng City, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China. Detailed site data, including elevation, climatic conditions, and geographical features, were recorded in situ. Photographs of fungal specimens in their natural habitat were taken using a Canon G15 camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Collected materials were wrapped in waterproof foil and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis. Macroscopic characteristics were examined using an Olympus SZ61 stereomicroscope. Micromorphological structures, including ascospores, asci, and ascomata, were photographed using a Canon 700D digital camera mounted on a compound microscope. Ascospores were cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), and pure cultures were obtained following the methodology of Senanayake et al. (2020b). Fungal hyphae were grown on Malt extract agar (MEA), Oat Meal Agar (OMA), and PDA to examine the colony morphology. All microscopic measurements were performed using the Tarosoft Image Frame Work (v. 0.9.0.7). Image composites were processed and adjusted with Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (version 10.0, Adobe Systems, USA). Voucher specimens were deposited at the fungarium of the Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HKAS). Index Fungorum numbers (http://www.indexfungorum.org) were registered for all novel taxa.

2.2 DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the fresh stromata tissue using the Biospin DNA Extraction Kit (Hangzhou Bioer Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted DNA was stored at -20 °C before amplification. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing were performed for four genetic loci: the partial 28S Large Subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU) using primers LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester, 1990); the complete Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region using primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990); the beta-tubulin (TUB2) gene using primers T1 and T22 (O'Donnell and Cigelnik, 1997); and the RNA polymerase II subunit 2 (RPB2) gene using primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al., 1999). PCR reactions were conducted following the protocol described in Senanayake et al. (2020b). The total volume of the PCR reaction was 25 µL, containing 1 µL of DNA template, 1 µL of each forward and reverse primer, 12.5 µL of 2 × PCR Master Mix, and 9.5 µL of sterile double-distilled water (ddH2O). Amplification was performed for 35 cycles under the thermocycling conditions detailed in Table 1. PCR products were visualized via electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Products were purified and sequenced commercially (Sunbiotech Company, Beijing, China). Raw sequences were assembled, edited, and quality-checked using DNASTAR Lasergene v. 7.1. Newly generated sequences were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)GenBank database; corresponding accession numbers are provided in Table 2.

Table 1. Primers and optimized PCR protocols used in this study.

LocusPCR protocols (Annealing temperature in bold)References
LSU(94 °C: 1 min, 56 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 35 cyclesVilgalys and Hester (1990)
ITS(94 °C: 50 s, 56 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 35 cyclesWhite et al. (1990)
TUB2(94 °C: 30 s, 57 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 35 cyclesO'Donnell and Cigelnik (1997)
RPB2(95 °C: 30 s, 55 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 1 min) × 35 cyclesLiu et al. (1999)

Table 2. Details of the isolates used in the phylogenetic tree.

SpeciesCulture accession numberITSLSURPB2TUB2References
Acrocordiella omanensisSQUCC 15091TMG584568MG584570−−Maharachchikumbura et al. (2018)
Acrocordiella yunnanensisHKAS 111922TMW424507MW424505−−Dissanayake et al. (2021)
Alloanthostomella rubicolaMFLUCC 16-0479KX533455KX533456−−Daranagama et al. (2015)
Allocryptovalsa cryptovalsoideaHVFIG02HQ692573−−HQ692524Trouillas et al. (2011)
Allocryptovalsa elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0707TMN308410MN308401−MN340296Konta et al. (2020)
Allocryptovalsa microthecaMFLUCC 18-1434PV617424PV617572PV902086PV901980Dissanayake et al. (2025)
Allocryptovalsa polysporaMFLUCC 17-0364TMF959500MF959503−MG334556Senwanna et al. (2017)
Allocryptovalsa rabenhorstiiWA08CBHQ692619−−HQ692523Senwanna et al. (2017)
Allocryptovalsa truncatePUFNI17639TMK990279MK981538−−Hyde et al. (2020a)
Allodiatrype arengaeMFLUCC 15-0713TMN308411MN308402MN542886MN340297Konta et al. (2020)
Alloeutypa flavovirensCHUNI6KR092798KR092774−−Senanayake et al. (2015)
Amphibambusa bambusicolaMFLUCC 11-0617TKP744433KP744474−−Liu et al. (2015)
Amphirosellinia nigrosporaHAST 91092308TGU322457−GQ848340GQ495951Hsieh et al. (2010)
Annulohypoxylon terebratumCBS 119137TDQ631943DQ840069DQ631954DQ840097Fournier et al. (2010)
Annulohypoxylon truncatumCBS 140778TKY610419KY610419KY624277KX376352Wendt et al. (2018)
Anthostoma decipiensCDKC774565KC774565−−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Anthostomella obesaMFLUCC 14-0171TKP297405KP340546KP340533KP406616Daranagama et al. (2015)
Anthostomelloides krabiensisMFLUCC 15-0678KX305927KX305928KX305929−Tibpromma et al. (2017)
Arecophila miscanthiFU31025MK503821MK503827−−Karunarathna et al. (2021)
Ascotricha chartarumCBS 902.69MH859477MH871257−−Vu et al. (2019)
Ascotricha erinaceaCBS 535.73KF893285MH872482−KF893272Cheng et al. (2015)
Ascotricha rugisporaNBRC 33167TLC146763LC146763−−Okane et al. (2001)
Astrocystis mirabilisHAST 94070803GU322448−GQ844835GQ495941Hsieh et al. (2010)
Barrmaelia macrosporaCBS 142768TKC774566KC774566MF488995MF489014Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Barrmaelia rappaziiCBS 142771TMF488989MF488989MF488998MF489017Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Barrmaelia rhamnicolaCBS 142772TMF488990MF488990MF488999MF489018Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Biscogniauxia ancepsYMJ 123EF026132−JX507777AY951671Hsieh et al. (2010)
Biscogniauxia capnodesYMJ 138EF026131−JX507779AY951675Hsieh et al. (2010)
Biscogniauxia mangiferaeMFLU 18-0827TMN337232MN336236MN366247MN509782Hyde et al. (2020a)
Biscogniauxia nummulariaMUCL 51395TKY610382KY610427KY624236KX271241Wendt et al. (2018)
Brunneiperidium gracilentumMFLUCC 14-0011TKP297400KP340542KP340528KP406611Daranagama et al. (2015)
Cainia graminisMFLUCC 15-0540KR092793KR092781−−Senanayake et al. (2015)
Calceomyces lacunosusCBS 633.88TKY610397KY610476KY624293KX271265Wendt et al. (2018)
Camillea obulariaATCC 28093KY610384KY610429KY624238KX271243Wendt et al. (2018)
Castellaniomyces rosaeMFLUCC 15-0536TMF614127MF614130−−Senanayake et al. (2015)
Circinotrichum maculiformeCBS 122758KR611875KR611896−−Crous et al. (2015)
Clypeosphaeria mamillanaCBS140735TKT949897KT949897MF489001MH704637Jaklitsch et al. (2016)
Clypeosphaeria mamillanaWU 33599KT949898KT949898−−Jaklitsch et al. (2016)
Clypeosphaeria mamillanaWU 36850KT949899KT949899−−Jaklitsch et al. (2016)
Clypeosphaeria perfidiosaCBS 142773MF488993−MF489003MF489021Vu et al. (2019)
Collodiscula japonicaCBS 124266JF440974MH874889KY624273−Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012)
Coniocessia anandraCBS 125766TMH863747MH875215−−Vu et al. (2019)
Coniocessia cruciformisCBS 126674−MH875663−−Vu et al. (2019)
Coniocessia maximaCBS 593.74TGU553332MH878275−−Vu et al. (2019)
Coniocessia nodulisporioidesCBS 281.77TMH861061MH872831−−Vu et al. (2019)
Coniolariella gamsiiCo27GU553325GU553329−−Vu et al. (2019)
Creosphaeria sassafrasSTMA 14087KY610411KY610468KY624265KX271258Wendt et al. (2018)
Cryptosphaeria eunomiaCBS216.87TKT425230KT425296−−Trouillas et al. (2015)
Cryptosphaeria subcutaneaCBS 240.87TKT425232KT425297−−Trouillas et al. (2015)
Cryptostroma corticaleCBS 216.52HG934110MH868529HG934116HG934102Vu et al. (2019)
Cryptovalsa ampelinaATCC MYA-4399FJ430591FJ430582−−Trouillas et al. (2010)
Daldinia concentricaCBS 113277AY616683KY610434KY624243KC977274Triebel et al. (2005)
Daldinia loculatoidesCBS 113279TAF176982KY610438KY624247KX271246Triebel et al. (2005)
Daldinia sp.ATCC 46302KY610389KY610443KY624253KX271248Wendt et al. (2018)
Delonicicola siamenseMFLUCC 15-0670TMF167586MF158345MF158346−Perera et al. (2017)
Dematophora bunodesCBS 124028MN984619MN984625−MN987245Wittstein et al. (2020)
Dematophora necatrix89062904EF026117−−EF025603Hsieh et al. (2010)
Dematophora necatrixCBS 349.36AY909001KF719204KY624275KY624310Peláez et al. (2008)
Diabolocovidia claustriCPC37593TMT373367MT373350−−Crous et al. (2020)
*Dianjunus rex*HKAS148941<sup>T</sup>PX777991PX777996PX987258PX930195This study
*Dianjunus rex*HKAS148942PX777992PX777997PX987259PX930196This study
*Dianjunus rex*HKAS150823PX777993PX777998PX987260−This study
*Dianjunus rex*HKAS150824PX777994PX777999PX987261PX930197This study
*Dianjunus rex*HKAS151626PX777995PX778000PX987262−This study
Diatrype bullataUCDDCH400DQ006946−−DQ007002Rolshausen et al. (2006)
Diatrype disciformisAFTOL-ID 927DQ470964U47829DQ470915−Spatafora et al. (2006)
Diatrype lijiangensisMFLU 19-0717TMK852582MK810546−MK852583Thiyagaraja et al. (2019)
Diatrype virescensCBS 128344MH864890MH876339−−Vu et al. (2019)
Diatrypella favaceaCBS 198.49MH856491MH868027−−Vu et al. (2019)
Diatrypella heveaeMFLUCC 15-0274TMN308418MN308409MN542892MN340301Vu et al. (2019)
Diatrypella tectonaeMFLUCC 12-0172bTKY283085KY283080−−Shang et al. (2017)
Didymobotryum rigidumJCM 8837TLC228650LC228707−−Schoch et al. (2012)
Discoxylaria myrmecophila169GU322433−GQ844819GQ487710Hsieh et al. (2010)
Durotheca crateriformisGMBC 0205TMH645426MH645425MH645427MH049441Long et al. (2019)
Emarcea castanopsidicolaCBS 117105TAY603496MK762717MK791285MK776962Duong et al. (2004)
Endocalyx cinctusJCM 7946LC228648LC228704−−Schoch et al. (2012)
Endocalyx metroxyliMFLUCC 15-0723ATMT929162MT929313−−Thitla et al. (2025)
Engleromyces sinensisBJTC 200802ETMZ622704MZ622701MZ622185−Gao et al. (2023)
Engleromyces sinensisBJTC 200801MZ622703MZ622700MZ622184MZ622187Gao et al. (2023)
Entalbostroma erumpensICMP 21152TKX258206−KX258204KX258205Johnston et al. (2016)
Entosordaria quercinaCBS 142774TMF488994MF488994MF489004MF489022Voglmayr et al. (2018)
Eutypa lataDSC100HM164729−HM164797HM164763Trouillas and Gubler (2010)
Eutypella quaternataMFLU 15-2605MT185553MT183518MT432247−Li et al. (2020)
Fasciatispora arengaeMFLUCC 15-0326aTMK120275MK120300MK890794MK890793Doilom et al. (2018)
Fasciatispora cocoesMFLUCC 18-1445TMN482680MN482675MN481517MN505154Hyde et al. (2020b)
Fasciatispora nypaeMFLUCC 11-0382TNR_185352NG_067532−−Liu et al. (2015)
Fusiformiascus pulvinatusH048FR715523FR715523−FR715495Pažoutová et al. (2012)
Graphostroma platystomumCBS 270.87TJX658535DQ836906KY624296HG934108Stadler et al. (2014)
Guayaquilia cubensisMUCL 39017KC775733KC775708−−Becerra-Hernández et al. (2016)
Gyrothrix inopsBE108KC775746KC775721−−Becerra-Hernández et al. (2016)
Gyrothrix ramoseMUCL 54061KC775747KC775722−−Becerra-Hernández et al. (2016)
Halocryptovalsa salicorniaeMFLUCC 15-0185TMH304410MH305304−MH370274Dayarathne et al. (2020)
Halodiatrype avicenniaeMFLUCC 15-0948MH304414MH305308−MH370278Dayarathne et al. (2020)
Halorosellinia krabiensisMFLU 17-2596TMN047119MN017883−MN431493Dayarathne et al. (2020)
Hansfordia pruniCBS 194.56TMK442585MH869122KU684307−Crous et al. (2019)
Hansfordia pulvinataCBS 144422MK442587MK442527−−Crous et al. (2019)
Hansfordia pulvinataCBS 254.59KF893288MH869394−−Crous et al. (2019)
Haploanthostomella elaeidisMFLU 20-0522TMT929161MT929312−−Thitla et al. (2025)
Hypocopra anomalaTTI-000339−MT903245MT901033MT901030Becker et al. (2020)
Hypocopra dolichopodaTTI-000310−MT903247MT901035−Becker et al. (2020)
Hypocopra rostrataNRRL 66178KM067909KM067909−−Jayanetti et al. (2014)
Hypomontagnella monticulosaMFLUCC 18-0362MN337231MN336235MN366246MN509783Lambert et al. (2019)
Hypoxylon fragiformeMUCL 51264TKC477229KM186295KM186296KX271282Daranagama et al. (2015)
Hypoxylon lienhwacheenseMFLUCC 14-1231KU604558MK287550MK287563KU159522Sir et al. (2019)
Pyrenopolyporus hunteriSTMA07009−−KY624309−Wendt et al. (2018)
Idriella lunataCBS 204.56TMH857584MH869129−−Vu et al. (2019)
Jackrogersella multiformisCBS 119016TKC477234KY610473KY624290KX271262Wendt et al. (2018)
Kretzschmaria deustaCBS163.93−−KY624227−Wendt et al. (2018)
Kretzschmariella culmorumJDR88KX430043−KX430045KX430046Fournier et al. (2018)
Leptosillia cordylinesMFLU 20-0056MT073349NG_068699MT023134MT023136Senanayake et al. (2020a)
Linosporopsis ischnothecaLIF1MN818952MN818952MN820708MN820715Voglmayr and Beenken (2020)
Linosporopsis ochraceaLIO3MN818958MN818958MN820714MN820721Voglmayr and Beenken (2020)
Longiappendispora chromolaenaeMFLU 20-0320TMT214370MT214464−−Mapook et al. (2020)
Lopadostoma americanumCBS 133211TKC774568KC774568KC774525−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma dryophilumLG21NR_132028KC774570KC774526MF489023Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma fagiCBS 133206TKC774575KC774575KC774531−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma gastrinumMFLU 17-0941MN337229MN336233MN366245−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma insulareCBS 133214TKC774589KC774589KC774542−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma lechatiiCBS 133694TKC774590KC774590KC774543−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma quercicolaCBS 133212TKC774610KC774610KC774558−Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lopadostoma turgidumCBS 133207TKC774618KC774618KC774563MF489024Jaklitsch et al. (2014)
Lunatiannulus irregularisMFLUCC 14-0014TKP297398KP340540KP340526KP406609Daranagama et al. (2015)
Melanographium phoenicisMFLUCC 18-1481TMN482677MN482678−−Hyde et al. (2020a)
Microdochium lycopodinumCBS 125585TJF440979JF440979KP859125KP859080Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012)
Microdochium phragmitisCBS 285.71TKP859013KP858949KP859122KP859077Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012)
Monosporascus cannonballusMC1703JQ743053−−JQ804936Cavalcante et al. (2020)
Muscodor thailandicusMFLUCC 17-2669TMK762707MK762714MK791283MK776960Samarakoon et al. (2020)
Muscodor ziziphiMFLUCC 17-2662MK762705MK762712MK791281MK776958Samarakoon et al. (2020)
Nemania abortiveBISH467TGU292816−GQ844768GQ470219Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania beaumontiiHAST405GU292819−GQ844772GQ470222Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania bipapillataHAST90080610GU292818−GQ844771GQ470221Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania diffusaHAST91020401GU292817−GQ844769GQ470220Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania illitaYMJ236EF026122−GQ844770EF025608Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania macrocarpaWSP265TGU292823MH874423GQ844776GQ470226Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania maritimaHAST89120401TGU292822−GQ844775GQ470225Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania primoluteaYMJ91102001TEF026121−GQ844767EF025607Hsieh et al. (2010)
Nemania sp.BCC30850KX037428KX037429KX037430−Kornsakulkarn et al. (2017)
Nemania sphaeriostomaJDR 261GU292821−GQ844774GQ470224Hsieh et al. (2010)
Neoanthostomella ficiMFLU 19-2765TMW114390MW114445MW177711−Tennakoon et al. (2021)
Neoanthostomella viticolaMFLUCC 16-0243TKX505957KX505958KX789496KX789495Daranagama et al. (2015)
Neoeutypella baoshanensisMFLUCC 16-1002TMT310662MT214618−−Phukhamsakda et al. (2020)
Neoidriella desertorumCBS 985.72TKP859048KP858985−−Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2016)
Obolarina persicaYMJ 1461JX507807−JX507792JX507796Mirabolfathy et al. (2013)
Paraeutypella citricolaHUEFS 194248KM396616KM407630−KR534602de Almeida et al. (2016)
Paraeutypella vitisUCD2428TXFJ790851−−GU294726Úrbez-Torres et al. (2009)
Paraxylaria rosacearumTASM 6132TMG828941MG829050−−Wanasinghe et al. (2018)
Pedumispora rhizophoraeBCC44877KJ888853KJ888850−−Klaysuban et al. (2014)
Peroneutypa diminutiascaMFLUCC 17-2144TMG873479MG873473−MH316765Shang et al. (2018)
Peroneutypa diminutisporaHUEFS 192196TKM396647KM407664−−de Almeida et al. (2016)
Peroneutypa mackenzieiMFLUCC 16-0072TKY283083KY283079−KY706363Shang et al. (2017)
Peroneutypa mangroveiPUFD526TMG844286MG844278−MH094409Phookamsak et al. (2019)
Peroneutypa scopariaMFLUCC 11-0615KU940152KU863140KU940180−Dai et al. (2016)
Pirozynskiomyces sinensis2184417KY994106KY994107−−Li et al. (2017)
Podosordaria mexicanaWSP176GU324762−GQ853039GQ844840Hsieh et al. (2010)
Poronia punctateCBS 656.78TKT281904KY610496KY624278KX271281Senanayake et al. (2015)
Pseudoanthostomella conorumCBS 119333EU552099EU552099−−Marincowitz et al. (2008)
Pseudoanthostomella delitescensMFLUCC 16-0477KX533451KX533452KX789491KX789490Daranagama et al. (2015)
Pseudoanthostomella pini-nigraeMFLUCC 16-0478TKX533453KX533454KX789492−Daranagama et al. (2015)
Pseudoceratocladium polysetosumFMR10750KY853430KY853490−−Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2017)
Pseudocircinotrichum papakuraeCBS101373KR611876KR611897−−Crous et al. (2015)
Pyrenomyxa morganiiCBS 118186TMH863028MH874581−−Vu et al. (2019)
Pyrenopolyporus hunteriMUCL 52673TKY610421KY610472KY624309KU159530Wendt et al. (2018)
Pyriformiascoma trilobatumMFLUCC 14-0012TKP297402KP340543KP340530KP406613Daranagama et al. (2015)
Requienella fraxiniCBS 140475TNR_138415KT949910−−Jaklitsch et al. (2016)
Requienella seminudaCBS 140502TNR_154630KT949912MK523300−Jaklitsch et al. (2016)
Rhopalostroma angolenseCBS 126414FN821965KM186298KM186297KM186299Stadler et al. (2010)
Rosellinia aquilaMUCL 51703KY610392KY610460KY624285KX271253Wendt et al. (2018)
Rosellinia chiangmaiensisMFLUCC 15-0015TKU246226KU246227−−Daranagama et al. (2015)
Rosellinia corticiumMUCL 51693KY610393KY610461KY624229KX271254Wendt et al. (2018)
Rosellinia limonisporaCBS 382.86KR611876KR611897−−Hartley (2020)
Rosellinia merrilliiHAST89112601GU300071−GQ844781GQ470229Hsieh et al. (2010)
Rosellinia thelenaCBS 400.61KF719202KF719215−−Wu et al. (2025)
Ruwenzoria pseudoannulataMUCL 51394TKY610406KY610494KY624286KX271278Wendt et al. (2018)
Sarcoxylon compunctumCBS 359.61KT281903KT281898KY624230KX271255Senanayake et al. (2015)
Selenodriella cubensisCBS 683.96TKP859053KP858990−−Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2017)
Seynesia erumpensSMH 1291−AF279410AY641073−Bhattacharya et al. (2000)
Sporidesmina malabaricaNN43118−DQ408580−−Bhattacharya et al. (2000)
Sporidesmina polyporaNN47796OL627678DQ408569DQ435087−Delgado et al. (2025)
Stilbohypoxylon elaeidicolaHAST 94082615GU322440−GQ844827GQ495933Hsieh et al. (2010)
Stilbohypoxylon elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0295bMT496746MT496756−−Konta et al. (2020)
Stromatoneurospora phoenixBCC82040MT703666MT735133MT742605MT700438Becker et al. (2020)
Thamnomyces dendroideusCBS 123578TFN428831KY610467KY624232KY624313Stadler et al. (2010)
Theissenia cinereaYMJ 90071615TEF026128−JX507793EF025613Hsieh et al. (2010)
Thuemenella cubisporaCBS 119807JX658531EF562508−−Stadler et al. (2014)
Vamsapriya bambusicolaMFLUCC 11-0477TKM462835KM462836KM462834KM462833Dai et al. (2014)
Vamsapriya breviconidiophoraMFLUCC 14-0436TMF621584MF621588−−Li et al. (2017)
Vamsapriya indicaMFLUCC 12-0544KM462839KM462840KM462841KM462838Dai et al. (2014)
Vamsapriya khunkonensisMFLUCC 11-0475TMW240620MW240549KM462829KM462828Dai et al. (2014)
Vesiculozygosporium echinosporumCPC 35607TMT223869MT223940−−Crous et al. (2020)
Virgaria nigraCBS 128006MH864744MH876180−−Vu et al. (2019)
Xenoanthostomella chromolaenaeMFLUCC 17-1484TMN638863MN638848MN648729−Hyde et al. (2020a)
Xenoanthostomella cycadisCPC17285KJ869121KJ869178−−Crous et al. (2014)
Xylaria allantoideaBCC22746MT703671MT735141MT742610−Becker et al. (2020)
Xylaria atrosphaericaHAST91111214GU322459−GQ848342GQ495953Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria digitateHAST919GU322456−GQ848338GQ495949Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria heliscusHAST88113010GU324742−GQ848355GQ502691Hsieh et al. (2010)
Xylaria hypoxylonCBS122620TAM993141KM186301KM186302KM186300Peršoh et al. (2009)
Xylaria longipesCBS 148.73MH860649MH872351KU684280KU684204Vu et al. (2019)
Xylaria polymorphaMUCL 49884KY610408KY610464KY624288KX271280Wendt et al. (2018)
Xylaria regalisHAST92072001GU324744−GQ848357GQ502693Hsieh et al. (2010)
Zygosporium minusHKAS 99625TMF621586MF621590−−Li et al. (2017)
Zygosporium oscheoidesMFLUCC 14-0402TMF621585MF621589−−Li et al. (2017)

Newly generated sequences are bold.

AFTOL-ID, Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life; ATCC, The American Type Culture Collection; BAFC, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires; BCC, Biotec Culture Collection; BCMX, Baja California Mexico; BISH, Herbarium Pacificum; CBS, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; CPC, Culture Collection of Pedro Crous; DAOM, Canadian National Mycological Herbarium; FMR, Facultad de Medicina, Spain; GBMC, Global Microbiome Conservancy; HAST, Biodiversity Research Museum, Herbarium Academia Sinica; HKAS, Cryptogamic Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany; HKU-M, Hong Kong University Herbarium; HKUCC, Hong Kong University Culture Collection; HUEFS, Herbarium of the University of Helsinki; ICMP, International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants; JCM, Japan Collection of Microorganisms; KNU, Kyungpook National University, Korea; MFLU, Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium; MFLUCC, Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection; MUCL, Agro-food & Environmental Fungal Collection; NBRC, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation; NRRL, Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection; PDD, New Zealand Fungarium; PUFD, Culture Collection at Pondicherry University; PUFNI, University of Pondicherry; SMH, National Museum of Natural History; SQUCC, Sultan Qaboos University Culture Collection; STMA, Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen microbial culture collection; TASM, Tasmanian Fungal Culture Collection; UCD, The U.C. Davis Viticulture and Enology Department Culture Collection; WA, The Western Australian Microbial Culture Collection; WSP, Herbarium at Washington State University; WU, Herbarium of University of Vienna; YMJ, The Japan Collection of Microorganisms.

2.3 Phylogenetic analyses

Newly generated sequences were subjected to BLASTn searches against the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to determine preliminary taxonomic affiliations. Additional sequences were obtained from GenBank based on Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) results and previous studies. A concatenated dataset of LSU, ITS, RPB2, and TUB2 sequences was assembled, comprising 202 strains. Leptosillia cordylines (MFLU 20-0056) and Delonicicola siamense (MFLUCC 15-0670) were selected as the outgroup.

Individual gene alignments were generated using the online version of Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) v. 7.0362 (Katoh et al., 2019) with default parameters and manually refined in BioEdit 7.1.3 (Hall, 1999) where necessary. Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was performed with Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) (Stamatakis and Alachiotis, 2010) implemented in raxmlGUI v.1.5 (Silvestro and Michalak, 2012) using the ML + rapid bootstrap setting and the general time-reversible (GTR) + I + G model of nucleotide substitution with 1,000 rapid bootstrap replicates. For Bayesian inference (BI), the optimal substitution model (GTR+G+I) was determined using MrModeltest software v. 2.2 (Nylander, 2004). BI analysis was conducted in MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al., 2012) with four simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo chains from random trees over 3 million generations (standard deviation of split frequencies < 0.01), sampling every 500th generation. The distribution of log-likelihood scores was detected to check whether sampling was in the stationary phase, and Tracer v1.5 was used to check if further runs were required to reach convergence (Rambaut and Drummond, 2007). The first 20% of sampled trees were discarded as burn-in before calculating a consensus tree and posterior probabilities. Resultant phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree v.1.4 (Rambaut, 2012).

2.4 De novo genome assembly and genome sequencing of Dianjunus rex

Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing were performed on three stromata of Dianjunus rex collected from the wild. Internal tissue was excised from each stroma. High-quality genomic DNA was extracted from each sample using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)method (Porebski et al., 1997). Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen) extraction kit, followed by purification using the Plant RNA Purification Reagent (Invitrogen) purification kit. Short DNA and RNA reads were generated for each sample on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA). These reads were then trimmed and filtered using fastp (v0.23.2) (Chen et al., 2018) with parameters ‘-f 10 and -F 10’ to remove adapter sequences and low-quality reads. For paired-end DNA sequencing data, afterthe clean data converted were into a FASTA file, 10,000 reads were randomly selected from each file and aligned against the NCBI Nucleotide (NT) database, indicating no significant contamination. Finally, in total, we obtained 49 Gb of clean data for DNA and 51 Gb for RNA, respectively. For genome assembly, the filtered DNA reads from each sample were assembled independently using SPAdes (v4.2.0) (Bankevich et al., 2012). Genome completeness was assessed by Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO, v5.2.2) (Simão et al., 2015) with the ascomycota_odb10 orthologous gene set.

2.5 Annotation of repetitive sequences and protein-coding genes

RepeatModeler (v2.0.2) (Flynn et al., 2020) was used to build the de novo repeat libraries and then sequences from the assembly were aligned to the de novo repeat libraries and known repeat databases to identify and mask repetitive elements, using RepeatMasker (v4.1.2) (Chen, 2004). Protein-coding genes in each genome were predicted using the Genome-wide Electronic Tool for Annotation (GETA, v2.6.1) pipeline (https://github.com/chenlianfu/geta), integrating evidence from homology-based, ab initio, and RNA-seq-based prediction approaches. For homology-based prediction, protein-coding sequences of Biscogniauxia marginata, Annulohypoxylon maeteangense, Daldinia caldariorum, Hypoxylon argillaceum, Astrocystis sublimbata, Durotheca rogersii, Kretzschmaria deusta, Nemania abortiva, Poronia punctata, and Xylaria curta were downloaded from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (Franco et al., 2022) and were used for gene prediction using GeneWise (v2.4.1) (Birney et al., 2004). The ab initio prediction was conducted using AUGUSTUS (v3.4.0) (Stanke et al., 2006). RNA-seq reads were aligned to the genome assembly using hierarchical indexing for spliced alignment of transcripts 2 (HISAT2, v2.1.0) (Kim et al., 2015), and protein-coding regions were predicted using TransDecoder (v5.5.0) (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder). The predictions from the three methods were then integrated and filtered against the Pfam database.

2.6 Phylogenetic tree construction and divergence time estimation

Protein sequences of 63 species in Pezizomycotina were downloaded from JGI Mycocosm database and combined with sequences from three samples generated in this study, resulting in 66 samples for phylogenetic analysis. Single-copy orthologous proteins conserved across all 66 samples were retrieved from the results of BUSCO assessment. A total of 302 single-copy orthologs were then aligned using MAFFT (v7.407) (Katoh et al., 2002) with default parameters, and the alignments were concatenated sequentially to construct a super matrix. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from this super matrix using IQ-TREE 3 (v3.0.1) (Wong et al., 2026), with Aspergillus niger and A. tetrazonus serving as the outgroup. Branch supports were assessed using a bootstrap approach with 1,000 replicates. The species tree was visualized using the web application Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT) (Xie et al., 2023).

To further cross-verify the topological stability across different ortholog selection workflows, an alternative dataset was constructed. Orthologous groups across the same 66 samples were clustered using OrthoFinder (v3.1.3) with the DIAMOND alignment mode (-S diamond) and MAFFT for sequence alignment (-M msa -A mafft), yielding 345 single-copy orthologous gene sets. The amino acid sequences of each orthogroup were aligned using MAFFT (v7.407) with automatic parameter selection (--auto). To eliminate poorly aligned or highly divergent regions, the alignments were systematically trimmed using trimAl (v1.4.rev15) with a gap threshold of 0.3 (-gt 0.3), ensuring that sites with more than 70% gaps were removed. Individual maximum-likelihood gene trees were then inferred from the trimmed alignments using IQ-TREE 3 (v3.0.1) under the best-fit evolutionary models automatically selected using ModelFinder Plus (MFP) with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates, utilizing the same outgroup (Aspergillus niger and A. tetrazonus). Finally, these 345 gene trees were used as input for Accurate Species TRee ALgorithm (ASTRAL, v5.7.1) to reconstruct the alternative coalescent-based species tree.

The MCMCtree module of the Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML)package (v4.9i) (Yang, 2007) was used to estimate each speciation time for these 66 Pezizomycotina samples. The phylogenetic tree constructed by IQ-TREE 3 served as a guide tree, with the divergence times from TimeTree (Kumar et al., 2017) used as calibration points: Aspergillus tetrazonus and Pyricularia oryzae (233.8~367.0 million years ago [MYA]), Pseudomassariella vexata and Microdochium trichocladiopsis (143.3~164.1 MYA), Microdochium bolleyi and Hypoxylon fuscum (103.4~318.2 MYA), and Colletorichum cereale and Verticillium longisporum (85.0~139.4 MYA).

2.7 Identification and analysis of carbohydrate-active enzymes

Carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) profiles were identified in the proteomes of all 66 Pezizomycotina samples. BLAST and hidden Markov model (HMM) searches were performed simultaneously using the proteomes as queries to detect putative CAZymes. For the BLAST searches, query protein sequences were used as inputs in the BLASTp tool against the database for automated CAZyme annotation (dbCAN, v11) (Yin et al., 2012). The resulting hits were filtered by e-value (1e-5) and identity threshold (20%). For the HMM search, the hmmscan program in the HMMER package was used to match the family-specific HMM profiles of CAZymes within dbCAN database (v11). The candidate genes obtained from both the BLAST and HMM searches were merged and only the overlapping hits were retained. The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioProject accession number of PRJNA1265937. All genome assemblies and gene annotation results have been archived in the figshare database and can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29153135.v2. The multilocus alignment of this study can be accessed via https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32611812.

3 Results

3.1 Phylogeny

All individual trees generated under different criteria and from single-gene datasets were essentially similar in topology and not significantly different from the tree generated from the concatenated dataset (not discussed herein). Maximum likelihood analysis of new strains generated in this study and other related taxa in this study with 1,000 bootstrap replicates yielded the best ML tree (Figure 1) with the likelihood value of ln: –6728.286175 and the following model parameters: alpha: 0.191444; Π(A): 0.244188, Π(C): 0.230054, Π(G): 0.301322, and Π(T): 0.224436. The substitution rates are as follows: AC: 0.763664, AG: 2.779076, AT: 1.349374, CG: 0.639806, CT: 6.128235, GT: 1.0. The Bayesian analysis resulted in 10,000 trees after 5,000,000 generations, and the first 20% of the trees were discarded. The remaining trees were used for calculating posterior probabilities in the majority-rule consensus tree. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥50% and Bayesian inference (BI) ≥0.9 are given at each node. Tree topologies of the ML and Bayesian analyses were similar to each other and there were no significant differences. Both topologies showed 15 well-supported major clades representing families in Xylariales. These new fungal collections grouped as a sister clade to Graphostromataceae with ML/BI = 100%/1.00 support.

Phylogenetic tree inferred from maximum likelihood analysis of the combined ITS, LSU, *TUB2*, and *RPB2* sequence alignment. Nodes are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.90. The tree was rooted with Leptosillia cordylines (MFLU 20-0056) and Delonicicola siamense (MFLUCC 15-0670). Ex-type cultures are denoted in bold, and sequences newly generated in this study are highlighted in red. Generic types are indicated by “<sup>GT</sup>”.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree inferred from maximum likelihood analysis of the combined ITS, LSU, TUB2, and RPB2 sequence alignment. Nodes are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.90. The tree was rooted with Leptosillia cordylines (MFLU 20-0056) and Delonicicola siamense (MFLUCC 15-0670). Ex-type cultures are denoted in bold, and sequences newly generated in this study are highlighted in red. Generic types are indicated by “GT”.

Phylogenomic analysis confirmed that Dianjunus rex represents a distinct lineage within Dianjunaceae (Figure 2). Comparative CAZyme annotation revealed an exceptionally compact and highly conserved enzyme repository across the three sequenced D. rex strains (HKAS151626, HKAS148941, and HKAS150823), encoding 220, 224, and 219 total CAZyme genes, respectively.

BUSCO assessments of the genome assembly and proteins of *Dianjunus* rex.
Figure 2. BUSCO assessments of the genome assembly and proteins of Dianjunus rex.

Across the broad phylogenomic tree of Sordariomycetes and related Xylariales (Figure 2), D. rex exhibits the most severe species-wide CAZyme contraction observed. Compared to typical saprobic and wood-decaying lineages such as Xylaria (535–635 genes), Daldinia (458–496 genes), and Hypoxylon (423–577 genes), the total CAZyme burden of D. rex is reduced by more than half. Specifically, Glycoside Hydrolases (GHs: 100–103) and Carbohydrate Esterases (CEs: 9–11) are markedly diminished, and Pectin Lyases (PLs) are virtually depleted (PL = 0-1; completely absent in strain HKAS148941) compared to 7–19 PL genes in closely related Xylariales lineages (Figure 2). Conversely, Glycosyltransferases (GTs: 57–58) represent a disproportionately high fraction (~25.9%–26.0%) of its overall enzymatic repertoire.

3.2 Phylogenomic tree construction and divergence time estimation

The genome assembly sizes of samples HKAS148941, HKAS150823, and HKAS151626 are 31.09 Mb, 32.01 Mb, and 30.48 Mb with contig N50 values of 47.63 kb, 42.61 kb, and 76.62 kb respectively (Table 3). Genome completeness assessment revealed that at least 96.19%, 95.96%, and 96.19% of single-copy BUSCO genes were identified in the assembly (Figure 3, Table 3).

Table 3. Genome assembly statistics of Dianjunus rex.

SampleContig N50 (kb)Contig NumTotal length (Mb)Protein-Coding genes
HKAS14894147.63147131.197793
HKAS15082342.61143732.016753
HKAS15162676.6288930.486779
Phylogenomic tree inferred from a genome-scale dataset comprising 66 Pezizomycotina species with Aspergillus niger and A. tetrazonus asoutgroup taxa. Devonian (420–360 Ma), Carboniferous (360–300 Ma), Permian (300–250 Ma), Triassic (250–200 Ma), Jurassic (200–145 Ma),Cretaceous (145–65 Ma), Paleogene (65–23 Ma), Neogene (23–2.6 Ma).
Figure 3. Phylogenomic tree inferred from a genome-scale dataset comprising 66 Pezizomycotina species with Aspergillus niger and A. tetrazonus asoutgroup taxa. Devonian (420–360 Ma), Carboniferous (360–300 Ma), Permian (300–250 Ma), Triassic (250–200 Ma), Jurassic (200–145 Ma),Cretaceous (145–65 Ma), Paleogene (65–23 Ma), Neogene (23–2.6 Ma).

3.3 Taxonomy

Dianjunaceae F.Q. Yu, Pérez-Moreno & Senan., fam. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF904757

Etymology: Based on the type genus Dianjunus.

Diagnosis: Dianjunaceae is distinguished from other families in Xylariales by having large stromata with persistent powdery-fibrous surface, unique S-shaped germ slit in ascospores, the inverted-trapezoid, amyloid apical ring in Melzer’s reagent, and nodulisporium-like anamorph with periconiella-like branching patterns produce distantly-packed branchlets bearing cluster of cylindrical, conidiogenous cells.

Type genus: Dianjunus F.Q. Yu, Pérez-Moreno & Senan.

Teleomorph: Stromata upright, fleshy, variable in size, shape ranging from cylindrical, fusiform, turbinate to palm-shaped, terete to flattened, simple to branched from the base, sometimes arising from long rooting stipes, with flattened sterile apices. Outer crust coriaceous, immersed part in soil black, aerial part fertile, surface covered with a long persistent, hairy, whitish yellow fibrous substance, whitish in young stromata, turning progressively dark yellow at maturity, ostiole openings appear as black dots. Immersed part sterile, consisting of stipes, cylindrical, black, smooth. Internal tissues solid, homogeneous to fibrous, spongy, off-white to yellow, with a slightly darker core in aged specimens. Perithecia aggregated, immersed in stromata, subglobose, coriaceous, papillate, ostiolate. Ostioles raised-discoid, black, with a cylindrical papilla at center. Paraphyses sparse, hypha-like, narrowing toward the ends, hyaline, septate, slightly constricted at the septa, unbranched. Asci (6–)8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, long-stipitate, total length, with apical apparatus, appearing bilobed, bluing in Melzer’s reagent, reddish brown in Lugol’s solution, turning blue in Lugol’s solution after treatment with 3% (w/v) KOH. Ascospores overlapping uniseriate in the ascus, globose to oval or fusiform with acute ends, hyaline when young, becoming brown at maturity, with single, central guttule or with a large central and two small polar guttules, smooth, thick-walled, with a conspicuous, S-shaped germ slit one-half to four-fifths spore length on the flattened side. Anamorph: nodulisporium-like anamorph with periconiella-like branching patterns.

Notes: The multilocus phylogeny of ITS, LSU, TUB2, and RPB2 sequences showed that our new fungal collections clustered together forming a well-supported, distinct sister clade to Graphostromataceae in Xylariales. However, morphological characteristics of our collections are significantly different from those of species in this family. Further, only few genera in Graphostromataceae, such as Camillea and Biscogniauxia, produce upright stromata. The phylogenomic analyses also confirmed the placement of these collections as sister to Graphostromataceae in Xylariales. Therefore, we introduce this unidentified clade as a new family Dianjunaceae.

Dianjunus F.Q. Yu, Pérez-Moreno & Senan., gen. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF904733

Etymology: The generic name is derived from the “Dian Kingdom”, a historical society situated in the region of present-day Yunnan Province in southwestern China where the samples were collected. The epithet is combined with the Chinese word “jūn”, meaning ‘mushroom’ or ‘fungus’.

Type species: Dianjunus rex F.Q. Yu, Pérez-Moreno & Senan.

Arise from roots of dying host plants. Teleomorph: Stromata upright, fleshy, variable size and shape, ranging from cylindrical, fusiform, turbinate to palm-shaped, terete to flattened, simple to branched from the base, or at the top, arising from long rooting stipes, with flattened sterile apices. Outer crust coriaceous, black, ostiole openings appear as black dots. Aerial part fertile, surface covered with a long persistent, powdery, whitish yellow fibrous substance, whitish in young stromata, turning progressively dark yellow at maturity. Immersed part sterile, consisting of stipes, cylindrical, black, no powdery substance, smooth. Interior tissues solid, homogeneous to fibrous, spongy, off-white to yellow, with a slightly darker core in aged specimens, absence of discolouration with 5% (w/v) KOH. Ascomata perithecial, aggregated, scattered, immersed in stromata, subglobose, coriaceous, papillate, ostiolate. Ostioles raised-discoid, black, with a central, cylindrical papilla. Peridium dark brown, turning subhyaline inwardly, containing cells of textura porrecta mixed with textura angularis, evenly thickened. Paraphyses sparse, hypha-like, narrowing toward the ends, hyaline, septate, slightly constricted at the septa, unbranched, longer than asci, embedded in mucilaginous matrix. Asci (6–)8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, long-stipitate, total length, with apical apparatus, appearing bilobed, amyloid, cuboid in Melzer’s reagent, reddish brown in Lugol’s solution, turning blue in Lugol’s solution after treatment with 3% (w/v) KOH, inverted trapezoid. Ascospores overlapping uniseriate in the ascus, globose to oval or fusiform with acute ends, hyaline when young, becoming brown at maturity, with single, central guttule or with a large central and two small polar guttules, smooth, thick-walled, with a conspicuous, S-shaped germ slit one-half to four-fifths spore length on the flattened side. Anamorph: nodulisporium-like with periconiella-like branching patterns.

Notes: The phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS, LSU, TUB2, and RPB2 loci and phylogenomic analyses showed that these five collections (HKAS150824, HKAS151626, HKAS150823, HKAS148941, HKAS148942) clustered forming a well-supported clade (Figure 1). Morphological characters of collections in this clade are significantly different from those of sister clades. Therefore, we establish this clade as Dianjunus gen. nov.

Dianjunus rex F.Q. Yu, Pérez-Moreno & Senan., sp. nov. Figures 4–6

Stromata of *Dianjunus rex* in the field. **(a, c, d, f)** Stromata attached to host roots. **(b, e, g, h)** Stromata around host plant. **(a)** Collectors. **(i)** Total weight of largest bilobedstromata.
Figure 4. Stromata of Dianjunus rex in the field. (a, c, d, f) Stromata attached to host roots. (b, e, g, h) Stromata around host plant. (a) Collectors. (i) Total weight of largest bilobedstromata.
*Dianjunus rex* (HKAS148941, holotype). **(a)** Stromata. **(b)** Yellow powdery layer on outer crust covering ostioles. **(c)** Ostiole opening on stromatic surface. **(d)** Vertical cross section of ascoma. **(e)** Peridium. **(f)** Stromatic tissues in 5% (w/v) KOH. **(g)** Horizontal section through the stromata. **(h)** Apical ring in water. **(i)** Apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. **(j)** Apical ring in Lugol’s reagent after pretreatment with 3% (w/v) KOH. **(k)** Apical ring in Lugol’s reagent. **(l)** S-shaped germ-slits in ascospores in Melzer’s reagent. **(m-p)** Asci in water. **(q-zf)** Ascospores in water. Scale bars: a = 15 cm, b, c, e = 100 µm, d = 750 µm, g = 250 µm, l = 20 µm, m-p = 50 µm, h-k, q-zf = 10 µm.
Figure 5. Dianjunus rex (HKAS148941, holotype). (a) Stromata. (b) Yellow powdery layer on outer crust covering ostioles. (c) Ostiole opening on stromatic surface. (d) Vertical cross section of ascoma. (e) Peridium. (f) Stromatic tissues in 5% (w/v) KOH. (g) Horizontal section through the stromata. (h) Apical ring in water. (i) Apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (j) Apical ring in Lugol’s reagent after pretreatment with 3% (w/v) KOH. (k) Apical ring in Lugol’s reagent. (l) S-shaped germ-slits in ascospores in Melzer’s reagent. (m-p) Asci in water. (q-zf) Ascospores in water. Scale bars: a = 15 cm, b, c, e = 100 µm, d = 750 µm, g = 250 µm, l = 20 µm, m-p = 50 µm, h-k, q-zf = 10 µm.
Cultures and anamorph of *Dianjunus rex* (GBWSCC202508860). **(a, c, e)** Surface view of culture on MEA, OMA, and PDA respectively after a week. **(b, d, f)** Reverse view of culture on MEA, OMA, and PDA after a week. **(g, h)** 90-day-old sporulated culture on PDA. **(i)** Close-up view of spore-bearing structures. **(j)** Mycelia. **(k-m)** Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells with attached conidia. **(n)** Specialized mycelial cells from which conidiophores are derived. **(o)** Conidia. Scale bars: **l-n** = 20 µm, **j,k,o** = 10 µm.
Figure 6. Cultures and anamorph of Dianjunus rex (GBWSCC202508860). (a, c, e) Surface view of culture on MEA, OMA, and PDA respectively after a week. (b, d, f) Reverse view of culture on MEA, OMA, and PDA after a week. (g, h) 90-day-old sporulated culture on PDA. (i) Close-up view of spore-bearing structures. (j) Mycelia. (k-m) Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells with attached conidia. (n) Specialized mycelial cells from which conidiophores are derived. (o) Conidia. Scale bars: l-n = 20 µm, j,k,o = 10 µm.

Index Fungorum number: IF904732

Etymology: The species epithet rex (Latin = king) refers to the large size and majestic appearance of the stromata.

Type: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Luquan Yi and Miao Autonomous County, Tuanjie Town, Damaidi, associated with roots of Quercus variabilis Blume (Fagaceae), 5 August 2024, Jing Song, (HKAS148941, holotype), ex-type culture GBWSCC202508860, HKAS151626 (dried culture); ibid. 6 September 2024, Senanayake IC (HKAS148942, Paratype).

From roots of dying host plants and arise from rhizosphere soil. Teleomorph: Stromata upright, slender to plump fleshy, 20–50 cm total height, with fertile parts 10–20 cm high, 7–10(–15) cm diam., 250–600 g weight, variable size and shape, ranging from cylindrical, fusiform, turbinate to palm-shaped, terete to flattened, simple to branched from the base, or at the top, arising from long rooting stipes, with flattened sterile apices. Outer crust 200–300 μm thick, coriaceous, black, ostiole openings appear as black dots, ostiolar papillae are distributed in this layer. Aerial part fertile, surface covered with a long persistent, powdery, whitish yellow fibrous substance, whitish in young stromata, turning progressively dark yellow at maturity. Immersed part 20–30 cm high, 3–6 cm wide, sterile, consisting of stipes, cylindrical, black, no powdery substance, smooth. Interior tissues solid, homogeneous to fibrous, spongy, off-white to yellow, with a slightly darker core in aged specimens, absence of discoloration with 5% (w/v) KOH. Ascomata 400–750 μm diam., 1200–1500 μm high, perithecial, aggregated, scattered, immersed in stromata, subglobose, coriaceous, centrally papillate, ostiolate. Ostioles 150–280 μm diam., raised-discoid, black, with a cylindrical papilla at center. Paraphyses 4–7 μm broad (x̄ = 5 μm), sparse, hyphal, thin-walled, narrowing toward the ends, hyaline, septate, slightly constricted at the septa, unbranched, longer than asci, embedded in mucilaginous matrix. Peridium 70–100 µm (x̄ = 80 μm), thick, dark brown, turning subhyaline inwardly, containing cells of textura porrecta mixed with textura angularis, evenly ticked. Asci (6–)8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, long-stipitate, 115–160 × 8–10 µm (x̄ = 2.5 × 3 μm) total length, the spore-bearing parts 90–100 × 8–10 µm, with bilobed, apical apparatus, 2–3 µm high, 3–5 µm wide (x̄ = 3 × 4 μm) in water; cuboid, amyloid, 2–3 µm high, 2.8–3.2 µm wide (x̄ = 2.5 × 3 μm), in Melzer’s reagent; inverted trapezoid, reddish brown in Lugol’s solution, 2.5–3 µm high, 3–4.5 µm wide (x̄ = 3 × 4 μm), turning blue in Lugol’s solution after treatment with 3% (w/v) KOH. Ascospores 12–17 × 5–7 µm, overlapping uniseriate in the ascus, globose to oval or fusiform with acute ends, hyaline when young, becoming brown at maturity, with single, central guttule or with a large central and two small polar guttules, smooth, thick-walled, with a conspicuous, S-shaped germ slit one-half to four-fifths spore length on the flattened side. Anamorph: nodulisporium-like anamorph with periconiella-like branching patterns. Mycelium consisting of septate, branched, smooth-walled hyphae, hyaline to pale brown. Conidiophores 17–25 µm length, 6–8 µm width (x̄ = 20 × 7 µm, n = 10), macronematous, mononematous, erect, septate, smooth, pale to dark brown, arising singly from hyphae; branching profuse and arborescent (periconiella-like), with primary and secondary branches producing numerous short terminal branchlets. Conidiogenous cells 7–10 µm length, 3–6 µm width (x̄ = 9 × 5 µm, n = 20), terminal, polyblastic, sympodially proliferating (nodulisporium-like), denticulate; conidiogenous loci minute, with small truncate scars. Conidia 6–9 µm length, 3–5 µm width (x̄ = 8 × 4 µm, n = 25), produced singly on denticles, ellipsoid to ovoid, hyaline, smooth, unicellular.

Culture characteristics: Colonies after 7 days of incubation at 20 °C in dark; on PDA reaching 5 cm diam., circular, smooth margin, flat, bearing abundant aerial mycelium, initially white, turning to yellowish-white with time, lack of pigment production, heavily sporulated with black, globose conidiomata; on MEA reaching 4.5 cm, circular, thin, arachnoid, with abundant, initially white, later turning to blackish brown, radiating, dendritic hyphae; center compact, slightly olivaceous to grayish; margin even to diffuse, reverse view blackish, radiating, dendritic hyphae start from the center and spread toward the margin, lack of pigment production, fairly sporulated with black, globose conidiomata; on OMA reaching 5 cm, circular, white, dense, cottony to floccose, with abundant aerial mycelium, center compact and grayish, surface faintly radially striate with weak zonation, margin entire to diffuse, reverse view with circular, dark olivaceous to olive-brown pigmentation; central region buff to cream, sporulation did not occur.

Additional material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Mengla County, Mengla Town, attached to trunk and root of decaying unidentified tree, 14 July 2025, Xiao Aka, (HKAS150824); ibid., Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng City, Yipinglang Town, from roots of Quercus sp., 10 July 2025, Xie Tao, (HKAS150823).

Notes: In the combined multilocus phylogeny analysis of ITS, LSU, TUB2, and RPB2, the collections of Dianjunus species clustered together forming a distinct clade with support value of ML/BI = 100%/1.00 (Figure 1). The bootstrap value in phylogenomic analyses was also >90% (Figure 2). All the collections of Dianjunus rex are morphologically similar, and stromata of tropical collections are larger than those of subtropical collections (Figure 4). The young stromata mostly have bulb-like apex and they form finger-like branches when mature. The fresh stromata are very fleshy and dehydrate rapidly after being detached. There is no strong smell or taste from stromata. Therefore, based on morphological characters and phylogeny, these collections are introduced as a new species, Dianjunus rex. This anamorph described above is derived from pure cultures obtained from single-ascospore isolation. Both cultures obtained from single-spore isolation and conidia suspension of sporulated culture were used for molecular sequence comparison. The sequences of the ITS locus of both cultures are identical to each other.

Our collections morphologically resemble the genus Squamotubera P. Henn. Hennings (1903) erected the genus Squamotubera for the single species, S. le-ratii P. Henn., which was collected from Noumea, New Caledonia (island between Australia and New Zealand) from soil. Lloyd (1917) noted that Squamotubera le-ratii is similar to Sarcoxylon compunctum (Jungh.) Cooke except for its horizontal or upright stromatal development from bark of living plants. Therefore, it was synonymized as Sarcoxylon le-ratii (P. Henn.) Lloyd. Rogers (1981) also argued that Squamotubera might be congeneric with Sarcoxylon. However, considering the upright stromatal development of Squamotubera from subterranean sclerotia, Rogers (1981) conserved Squamotubera as a distinct genus and mentioned the requirement of further studies to clarify it. The genus Squamotubera is only known from its short Latin protologue by Hennings (1903) with no illustrations. Rogers (1981) noted that the holotype specimen of Squamotubera le-ratii is not available in specimen repositories (Farlow Herbarium, FH).

In the original description, Hennings (1903) described the stromata of Squamotubera le-ratii as “tuberiform, round depressed with squamose external surface”. Rogers (1981) amended the description and mentioned, “the suspicion that stromata arise from subterranean sclerotia” and “the exterior is convoluted with smaller wrinkles overall”. However, our collections do not fit any of these two characteristics. It is neither “tuberiform” nor “squamose or with wrinkles overall”. Apart from these diagnostic characteristics, there are other important taxonomic traits that do not fit with the description provided by Hennings (1903) or Rogers (1981) such as “interior pallid subcarnose” or “tan, solid with irregular lacunae”, while in our fungus, the inner context was “spongy, off-white to mostly yellow”.

Rogers (1981) described “Capitate apices quickly become soft with gelatinous areas beneath the perithecial layer” as a characteristic never recorded in our specimens, whose context always remains fibrous, spongy. Additionally, Rogers (1981) described “Parasite sur les vielles souches de Casuarina” [sic] in French, which means “Parasite on the old stumps of Casuarina sp.”, a host plant not recorded for our fungus. Germ-slits in ascospores were not reported from S. le-ratii by Hennings (1903) and Rogers (1981) while our collections have S-shaped germ-slits. The stromata of Squamotubera are 7 cm high and 5 cm wide, while stromata in our collections are 20–50 cm high and 7–10 (-15) cm diam. Therefore, our collections are significantly different from Squamotubera le-ratii (Table 4).

Table 4. Morphological character comparison of collections of Squamotubera and Dianjunus.

CharactersCollections described in
Hennings (1903)Rogers (1981)This study
Stromata
Shapetuberiform structure that externally recalls young sclerotia of Lentinus tuber-regium. Rounded-depressedUprightupright, ranging from cylindrical, fusiform, turbinate to palm-shaped
Size7 cm long, 5 cm wide, 15 mm thickup to 5 cm high and 2 cm broad at the somewhat capitate apex.20–50 cm total height, 7–10 (-15) cm diam.
Outer part
Colorash-grayyellow to olivaceous with brown tonesBlack with fertile part whitish when young, turning progressively to light yellow and dark yellow at maturity, with black stipe surfaces.
Texturemulti-layered membranes which can be peeled off in flakes, often scaly-flaky membranes, externally clothed with membranous, sub-papery, scaly coverings.pulverulent, convoluted with smaller wrinkles overall.The aerial fertile structures exhibit a persistent powdery-fibrous surface, coriaceous below, while the sterile regions of the cylindrical stipes are smooth.
Inner part
ColorPale leather-yellowTanoff-white to yellow
Texturesub-fleshySolid with irregular lacunae as a result of convolutions and infoldingsolid, homogeneous to fibrous, spongy
Ascomata
ShapeOvoid or ellipsoidNot described.subglobose
Size0.8-1 × 0.5-0.8 mm0.5 mm diam.0.40–0.75 mm diam., 1.2–1.5 mm high,
Apicesrounded, blunt apices partly protrude in an almost hemispherical manner, slightly prominent, sub-hemispherical.Not availableimmersed in stromata, subglobose, coriaceous, papillate, ostiolate.
Ostiolessub-hemispherical, punctiform, blackNot availableraised-discoid, black, with a cylindrical papilla at center
Additional charactersNot availableThe stromata quickly become soft with gelatinous areas beneath the perithecial layer during wetting. Rather soft, in a layer on the capitate parts of the stromataNot available
Microscopy of outer partThe outer gray membranes consist of interwoven, colorless, variably thick, often ribbon-like sterile hyphae, and thinner, septate, richly branched hyphae.Not availableMycelium consisting of septate, branched, smooth-walled hyphae, hyaline to pale brown.
Microscopy of fertile hyphaeFertile hyphae septate, branchedNot describedConidiophores 17–25 µm length, 6–8 µm width, macronematous, mononematous, erect, septate, smooth, pale to dark brown, arising singly from hyphae; branching profuse and arborescent (periconiella-like), with primary and secondary branches producing numerous short terminal branchlets.
Ascicylindrical, 8-spored, uniseriately arranged.Most asci are immature and agglutinated; measurements were not possible. The ascus tip is inverted hat-shaped, 3 µm broad × 1.5 µm high, bluing intensely in Melzer’s reagent(6–)8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, long-stipitate, 115–160 × 8–10 µm (x̄ = 2.5 × 3 μm) total length, with apical apparatus, 2–3 µm high, 2.8–3.2 µm wide (x̄ = 2.5 × 3 μm), appearing inverted trapezoid in optical longitudinal section, bluing in Melzer’s reagent.
Spores
shapeoblong-fusoid, blunt or somewhat pointed at both endsSeveral fusoid-inequilateral ascospores were observed, but these probably were not entirely mature.globose to oval
colorbrownish-black to dark brownLight brownhyaline with single, central guttule when young, becoming brown, ellipsoid with acute ends, smooth, thick-walled at maturity
inner contentscontaining 1–3 droplets internally, germ slit not describedNot described, no germ slit was observedcontaining a large central and two small polar guttules, with a conspicuous, S-shaped germ slit one-half to four-fifths spore length on the flattened side.
Size12–17 × 4–6 µm14.7–17 × 5.9–6.6 µm12–17 × 5–7 µm
Conidiain long chains, spherical or egg-shaped conidia 6–9 µm in size, catenulate, hyaline, spherical to ovoid, with a granular or warty ornamentationNot describedConidia 6–9 µm length, 3–5 µm width (x̄ = 8 × 4 µm, n = 25), produced singly on denticles, ellipsoid to ovoid, hyaline, smooth, unicellular.
HabitSubterranean ()?Not describedEpigeous
Specimen examinedNew Caledonia, near Nouméa, subterranean()? on hills. June 1903. Le Rat.New Caledonia: Le Rat no. 19, VI.1906, “Parasitic on old stumps of Casuarina” [translated from French] (FH);?Le Rat [as Penzigia compuncta (Jungh.) sterile]China: Yunnan Province, Kunming, Luquan Yi and Miao Autonomous County, (HKAS148941); Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture (HKAS150824); Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture (HKAS150823); in subtropical and tropical forests.
Specimen deposited atLostFHHKAS

4 Discussion

Yunnan Province, situated in southwestern China, is recognized for its exceptional fungal diversity (Feng and Yang, 2018). Its varied topography, encompassing subtropical forests, alpine meadows, grasslands, and wetlands, creates a spectrum of ecological niches and microhabitats that support a rich mycota (Sun et al., 2017). Driven by complex landscapes, diverse floristic communities hosting numerous endemic species, and predominantly tropical to subtropical climates, Yunnan constitutes a biodiversity hotspot for fungi. While over 6,000 species have been documented, total fungal richness is estimated to potentially exceed 100,000 species, with frequent discoveries of novel taxa and genera continuing to highlight the region’s underexplored status (Senanayake et al., 2022). Research has extensively documented major phyla such as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota.

The Province hosts a significant diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi, which form symbiotic associations with tree roots, particularly in temperate and subtropical forests (Liu et al., 2009; Dong et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2026). Commonly encountered genera include Boletus, Ganoderma, Russula, Tricholoma, Tuber (truffles), and Xylaria. These fungi play critical roles in nutrient cycling and forest ecosystem functioning. Yunnan is also notable for its edible fungi, especially Morchella species and truffles (genus Tuber), which hold substantial culinary and economic value both locally and globally. The utilization of wild edible mushrooms represents an important economic activity though it raises concurrent concerns regarding sustainable harvest and ecological impact. Thus, the diversity of edible fungi is a major focus of both ecological and economic research.

Up to now, very few species in Xylariales have been reported to produce massive stromata. The size of the stromata in Xylariales depends on the species, mode of life, and geographical location of collections. Engleromyces goetzei P.Henn. represents the largest species reported within the order Xylariales to date. Engleromyces goetzei produces subglobose, two-lobed stromata that are seated on and partially enveloping bamboo culms (Whalley et al., 2010). Gibson and Kimeria (1962) reported Engleromyces goetzei from North Kenya, where it forms subglobose stromata growing toward the tops of bamboo stems, about 30–40 ft. from the ground, varying considerably in size, from small growths weighing a few ounces to the largest with a diameter of nearly 30 cm and weighing around 3.2 kg. Meanwhile, Engleromyces sinensis M.A. Whalley, A. Khalil, T.Z. Wei, Y.J. Yao & Whalley, sampled in Yulong County in Yunnan Province, China, presented much smaller stromata that enveloped the bamboo culms and formed two lobes; the stromata were globose to subglobose, with sizes of 4.3–4.9 × 4–5.5 cm in width and 1.6–4 cm in height (Whalley et al., 2010). Most other species in Xylariales that morphologically resemble Dianjunus rex are Daldinia concentrica (Bolton) Cesati & de Notaris, Xylaria hypoxylon (L.) Grev., X. cubensis (Mont.) Fr., and X. longipes Nitschke. However, the majority of them produce black stromata. However, Dianjunus rex differs, apart from its larger size, in having less branched, pale to dark yellow stromata with blunt apex (Phillips et al., 2005).

Beyond its morphological distinctiveness, Dianjunus rex is phylogenetically isolated from all other known taxa in Xylariales. Divergence time estimates by Samarakoon et al. (2022) place the split between Amphisphaeriales and Xylariales at 154 (117–190) million years ago (MYA), with crown ages of 127 (92–165) MYA and 147 (111–184) MYA, respectively. Our analysis estimates the family Dianjunaceae diverged at approximately 65 (50–80) MYA (Figure 2), a timeframe consistent with the common family-level divergence trend of 50–150 MYA reported for fungi (Hyde et al., 2017). The phylogenomic topologies generated by the concatenation and summary-coalescent (ASTRAL) approaches were largely congruent, with one notable exception in a non-target lineage. Specifically, the phylogenetic position of Stanjemonium grisellum exhibited topological discordance between the concatenation tree and the two ASTRAL species trees (which were perfectly consistent with each other) (Supplementary Data). In the ASTRAL analyses, the local posterior probability (LPP) for this discordant node was 0.84 for the BUSCO dataset and dropped to 0.62 for the OrthoFinder dataset (Figure 7). This moderate-to-low support indicates historical gene tree conflicts, likely arising from widespread incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) or historical hybridization events within this non-target group. Crucially, despite this isolated background conflict, our core target topology was flawlessly and robustly preserved across all three distinct workflows. Dianjunus was consistently resolved as a sister group to the Graphostromataceae with maximum support (Bootstrap = 100 in the concatenation tree; LPP = 1.0 in both ASTRAL trees). This definitive consistency across diverse datasets and evolutionary models demonstrates that the taxonomic and evolutionary placement of our target family and genus is unequivocally stable (Figure 7). There are 432 monotypic fungal families, representing 35.4% of total known families in Kingdom Fungi (Hyde et al., 2024).

**(a)** Coalescent-Based Species Tree Inference Using BUSCO Dataset; **(b)** Alternative Phylogenetic Inference Based on OrthoFinder Dataset.
Figure 7. (a) Coalescent-Based Species Tree Inference Using BUSCO Dataset; (b) Alternative Phylogenetic Inference Based on OrthoFinder Dataset.

Species in Graphostromataceae show wide variations in anamorph morphology mainly described from sporulate cultures by nodulisporium-like conidial formation. However, sometimes other types of conidial formation have also been observed, such as sporothrix-like, rhinocladiella-like, virgariella-like, xylocladium-like, and periconiella-like (Ju and Rogers, 1996; Wendt et al., 2018). Our collections form a nodulisporium-like anamorph with periconiella-like branching patterns. The conidiophores are 15–25 µm long, with distantly packed branchlets bearing clusters of cylindrical, conidiogenous cells that are distinct from those of species in Graphostromataceae.

Comparative genomics revealed a conserved contraction of CAZyme genes (~220 genes) across all three D. rex strains compared to related saprobic Xylariales (>350 genes; Miyauchi et al., 2020). The most striking feature is the near-total depletion of pectin lyases (PL = 0-1, vs. 7–19 in related saprobes; Figure 2). In plant–fungus interactions, pectinases play a pivotal role in the initial breakdown of host plant cell walls, and their cleavage products can act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that trigger host immune responses (De Lorenzo et al., 2019). The loss of PL genes indicates a reduced genomic potential for pectin degradation, a feature consistent with genomic signatures of certain biotrophic or latent fungal endophytes (Mesny et al., 2021).

Concurrently, glycosyltransferases are proportionally enriched (GTs: ~26% of total CAZymes; Figure 2), which are primarily responsible for fungal cell wall biosynthesis. Because fruiting bodies of D. rex were observed exclusively post-host mortality, these combined traits support a working hypothesis of an endophyte-to-saprotroph lifestyle transition (Selosse et al., 2018). In this scenario, low metabolic maintenance costs of extracellular degradative enzymes, paired with sustained allocation to cell wall synthesis, may facilitate rapid carbon channeling into fungal biomass to form its massive stromata (Figure 5a). Such genomic adaptations accord with the dual ecological strategies widely observed in xylarialean endophytes, where genomic streamlining aligns with metabolic trade-offs between symbiotic latency and saprotrophic competence (Ren et al., 2022).

5 Conclusion

This study elucidates the taxonomic identity and phylogenetic relationships of an exceptional macromycete discovered in the subtropical and tropical forests of Yunnan Province, China. Through an integrative taxonomic approach combining detailed morphological examination, multi-locus phylogenetic analysis (ITS, LSU, RPB2, and TUB2), and phylogenomic data, the fungus is formally described as Dianjunus rex gen. et sp. nov. Phylogenetic reconstructions robustly place this novel taxon within the order Xylariales, where it forms a distinct, well-supported lineage sister to the family Graphostromataceae. This phylogenetic isolation, coupled with a unique suite of morphological characters, including massive, upright, fleshy stromata, a persistent powdery-fibrous surface, and a nodulisporium-like anamorph, is proposed to establish the new family Dianjunaceae. Divergence time estimation, calibrated using a genome-scale dataset, indicates that the Dianjunaceae lineage diverged during the early Paleocene, approximately 65 (50–80) million years ago. This timing coincides with the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary and the subsequent period of significant planetary ecological reorganization. The emergence of this morphologically distinct lineage in the aftermath of a major extinction event may reflect an adaptive radiation or the exploitation of newly available ecological niches during forest ecosystem recovery. The stromata of D. rex, reaching dimensions of up to 50 cm in height and 2.2 kg in weight, represent the largest stromata documented within the Ascomycota. This discovery significantly expands the known morphological disparity of the Xylariales, demonstrating that the evolution of gigantism in ascomycete fructifications has occurred independently in multiple lineages, including the stromata-forming Xylariales and the apothecia- or truffle-forming Pezizales. The discovery of Dianjunus rex and the Dianjunaceae underscores the profound and largely unexplored fungal diversity within East Asian forests, particularly in the biodiverse regions of southwestern China. It affirms the critical importance of continued mycological exploration integrated with modern molecular systematics, which remains essential for revealing hidden lineages, understanding the evolutionary trajectories of fungal morphology, and elucidating the complex history of Earth’s ecosystems.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffunb.2026.1940464/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Rajesh Jeewon, University of Mauritius, Mauritius

Reviewed by: Rui-Lin Zhao, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Changlin Zhao, Southwest Forestry University, China

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. W2532026), the Yunnan Technology Innovation Program (202205AD160036), the Yunnan Revitalization High-end Foreign Talent Support Program to Indunil C. Senanayake and Jesús Pérez-Moreno and the Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia (202503AP140012).

Data availability

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics approval

All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).

Author contributions

JS: Resources, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZhuY: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. JP-M: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FZ: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. SY: Writing – original draft, Data curation. TX: Writing – original draft, Resources. LS: Data curation, Writing – original draft. JL: Writing – original draft, Validation. YW: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. DL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. ZhenY: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. CY: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. WL: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. XS: Investigation, Writing – original draft. SW: Writing – original draft, Software. RC: Supervision, Writing – original draft. DD: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Visualization. IS: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. FY: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft.

References

  1. Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A. A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A. S.. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455 – 477. doi: doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
  2. Becerra-Hernández C. I., González D., De Luna E., Mena-Portales J. (2016). First report of pleoanamorphy in Gyrothrix verticiclada with an Idriella-like synanamorph. Cryptogam. Mycol. 37, 241 – 252. doi: doi:10.7872/crym/v37.iss2.2016.241
  3. Becker K., Stadler M. (2021). Recent progress in biodiversity research on the Xylariales and their secondary metabolism. J. Antibiot. 74, 1 – 23. doi: doi:10.1038/s41429-020-00376-0
  4. Becker K., Wongkanoun S., Wessel A.-C., Lambert C., Stadler M. (2020). Phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic studies confirm the affinities of Stromatoneurospora phoenix to the coprophilous Xylariaceae. J. Fungi 6, 144. doi: doi:10.3390/jof6030144
  5. Bhattacharya D., Lutzoni F., Reeb V., Simon D. M., Wilson R., Tehler A. (2000). Widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the rDNA genes of ascomycetes. Persoonia 17, 1971 – 1984. doi: doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026298
  6. Birney E., Clamp M., Durbin R. (2004). GeneWise and genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988 – 995. doi: doi:10.1101/gr.1865504
  7. Cavalcante A. L. A., Negreiros A. M. P., Tavares M. B., de Oliveira E. J., da Silva G. F. (2020). Characterization of five new Monosporascus species: adaptation to environmental factors, pathogenicity to cucurbits and sensitivity to fungicides. J. Fungi 6, 169. doi: doi:10.3390/jof6030169
  8. Cedeño-Sanchez M., Schiefelbein R., Stadler M., Voglmayr H. (2023). Redisposition of apiosporous genera Induratia and Muscodor in the Xylariales, following the discovery of an authentic strain of Induratia apiospora. Bot. Stud. 64, 8. doi: doi:10.1186/s40529-023-00372-1
  9. Chen N. (2004). Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinf. 5, 4.10.1 – 4.10.14. doi: doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s05
  10. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884 – i890. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
  11. Cheng X., Li W., Cai L. (2015). Molecular phylogeny of Ascotricha, including two new marine algae-associated species. Mycologia 107, 490 – 504. doi: doi:10.2307/26506910
  12. Chen Y. P., Su P. W., Yang C. H., Chen C. W. (2023). Phylogenomics and diversification of sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 14, 414 – 451. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/5
  13. Crous P. W., Schumacher R. K., Akulov A., Thangavel R., Hyde K. D. (2019). New and interesting fungi 2. Persoonia 43, 57 – 134. doi: doi:10.3114/fuse.2019.03.06
  14. Crous P. W., Schumacher R. K., Wingfield M. J., Lombard L., Giraldo A., Christensen M.. (2015). Fungal systematics and evolution: FUSE 1. Sydowia 67, 81 – 118. doi: doi:10.12905/0380.sydowia67-2015-0081
  15. Crous P. W., Shivas R. G., Quaedvlieg W., van der Bank M., Zhang Y., Summerell B. A.. (2014). Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280. Persoonia 32, 184 – 306. doi: doi:10.3767/003158514X682395
  16. Crous P. W., Wingfield M. J., Chooi Y. H., Gilbert D., Lacey E., Pitt J. I. (2020). Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia 44, 301 – 459. doi: doi:10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11
  17. Dai D. Q., Bahkali A. H., Li Q. R., Bhat D. J., Zhao R. L., Hyde K. D.. (2014). Vamsapriya (Xylariaceae) re-described, with two new species and molecular sequence data. Cryptogam. Mycol. 35, 339 – 357. doi: doi:10.7872/crym.v35.iss4.2014.3390020
  18. Dai D. Q., Phookamsak R., Wijayawardene N. N., Li W. J., Bhat D. J., Xu J.. (2016). Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Divers. 82, 1 – 105. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8
  19. Daranagama D. A., Camporesi E., Tian Q., Hyde K. D. (2015). Anthostomella is polyphyletic comprising several genera in Xylariaceae. Fungal Divers. 73, 203 – 238. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0329-6
  20. Dayarathne M. C., Wanasinghe D. N., Devadatha B., Jones E. B. G., Hyde K. D. (2020). Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne & K.D. Hyde, gen. nov. Cryptogam. Mycol. 41, 21 – 67. doi: doi:10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2020v41a3
  21. de Almeida D. A. C., Gusmão L. F. P., Miller A. N. (2016). Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae (Ascomycota, Xylariales) species from the Brazilian semi-arid region, including four new species. Mycol. Prog. 15, 53. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-016-1194-8
  22. Delgado G., Miller A. N., Crous P. W., Hyde K. D. (2025). New genera, species, combinations, and synonyms of saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from subtropical Texas, USA. Mycologia 117, 1104 – 1147. doi: doi:10.1080/00275514.2025.2540233
  23. De Lorenzo G., Ferrari S., Moira G., Mattei B., Cervone F. (2019). Cell wall traits that influence plant development, immunity, and bioconversion. Plant J. 97, 134 – 147. doi: doi:10.1111/tpj.14196
  24. Dissanayake L. S., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Mortimer P. E. (2021). Acrocordiella yunnanensis sp. nov. (Requienellaceae, Xylariales) from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 487, 103 – 113. doi: doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.487.2.1
  25. Dissanayake A. J., Shang Q. J., Chi M. F., Hyde K. D., Zhao R. L. (2025). Insights into the taxonomy and phylogeny of Diatrypaceae. Fungal Divers. 134, 461 – 634. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-025-00563-0
  26. Doilom M., Hyde K. D., Phookamsak R., Bhat D. J., Jones E. B. G., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N.. (2018). Mycosphere Notes 225–274: types and other specimens of some genera of Ascomycota. Mycosphere 9, 647 – 754. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/3
  27. Dong J. H., Li Q., Yuan Q., Luo Y. X., Zhang X. C., Dai Y. F.. (2024). Species diversity, taxonomy, molecular systematics and divergence time of wood-inhabiting fungi in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Asia. Mycosphere 15, 1110 – 1293. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/10
  28. Duong L., Lumyong S., Hyde K. D., Whalley M. A. (2004). Emarcea castanopsidicola gen. et sp. nov. from Thailand, a new xylariaceous taxon based on morphology and DNA sequences. Stud. Mycol. 50, 253 – 260.
  29. Feng B., Yang Z. (2018). Studies on diversity of higher fungi in Yunnan, southwestern China: A review. Plant Divers. 40, 165 – 171. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.001
  30. Flynn J. M., Hubley R., Goubert C., Rosen J., Clark A. G., Feschotte C.. (2020). RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 201921046. doi: doi:10.1073/pnas.1921046117
  31. Fournier J., Lechat C., Courtecuisse R. (2018). The genera kretzschmariella and nemania (Xylariaceae) in Guadeloupe and Martinique (French West Indies). Ascomycete.org 10, 1 – 47. doi: doi:10.25664/art-0226
  32. Fournier J., Lechat C., Courtecuisse R. (2020). The genus Xylaria sensu lato (Xylariaceae) in Guadeloupe and Martinique (French West Indies) III. Taxa with slender upright Stromata. Ascomycete.org 12 (3), 81 – 164. doi: doi:10.25664/ART-0302
  33. Fournier J., Stadler M., Hyde K. D., Wongkanoun S. (2010). The new genus Rostrohypoxylon and two new Annulohypoxylon species from Northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 40, 23 – 36. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-010-0026-4
  34. Franco M. E. E., Nickerson M. N., Bowen B. P., Louie K. B., Wang Y., Northen T. R.. (2025). Hyperdiverse, bioactive, and interaction-specific metabolites produced only in co-culture suggest diverse competitors may fuel secondary metabolism of xylarialean fungi. mSystems 10, e00468-25. doi: doi:10.1128/msystems.00468-25
  35. Franco M. E. E., Wisecaver J. H., Arnold A. E., Ju Y. M., Slot J. C., Ahrendt S.. (2022). Ecological generalism drives hyperdiversity of secondary metabolite gene clusters in xylarialean endophytes. New Phytol. 233, 1317 – 1330. doi: doi:10.1111/nph.17873
  36. Gao J., Liu S., Zou S., Zhang Y. (2023). An epitype of Engleromyces sinensis designated here. J. Edible Fungi 30, 102 – 110. doi: doi:10.16488/j.cnki.1005-9873.2023.02.011
  37. Gibson I. A., Kimeria J. (1962). A short note on Engleromyces goetzei P. Henn. East Afr. Agric. For. J. 28, 61 – 63. doi: doi:10.1080/00128325.1962.11661843
  38. Hall T. A. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95 – 98. doi: doi:10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14998u1.29
  39. Hartley J. M. H. (2020). Surveillance and isolation of Rosellinia necatrix in South African avocado orchards Msc Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75181 (Accessed April 25, 2026).
  40. Hennings P. C. (1903). Über die in Gebäuden auftretenden wichtigsten holzbewohnenden Schwämme. Hedwigia 42, 178 – 191.
  41. Hernández-Restrepo M., Gené J., Castañeda-Ruiz R. F., Mena-Portales J., Guarro J., Hyde K. D. (2017). Phylogeny of saprobic microfungi from Southern Europe. Stud. Mycol. 86, 53 – 97. doi: doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2017.05.002
  42. Hernández-Restrepo M., Groenewald J. Z., Crous P. W. (2016). Taxonomic and phylogenetic re-evaluation of Microdochium, Monographella and Idriella. Persoonia 36, 57 – 82. doi: doi:10.3767/003158516x688676
  43. Hsieh H., Lin C. R., Fang M. J., Rogers J. D., Fournier J., Lechat C.. (2010). Phylogenetic status of Xylaria subgenus Pseudoxylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Persoonia 54, 957 – 969. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.015
  44. Hyde K. D., Dong Y., Phookamsak R., Jeewon R., Bhat D. J., Jones E. B. G.. (2020 a). Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 100, 5 – 277. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5
  45. Hyde K. D., Noorabadi M. T., Thiyagaraja V., He M. Q., Johnston P. R., Jones E. B. G. (2024). The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15, 5146 – 6239. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25
  46. Hyde K. D., Norphanphoun C., Abreu V. P., Bazzicalupo A., Beimforde C., Bittencourt F.. (2017). Fungal diversity notes 603–708: taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Divers. 87, 1 – 235. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-017-0391-3
  47. Hyde K. D., Norphanphoun C., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Bhat D. J., Jones E. B. G., Bundhun D.. (2020 b). Refined families of sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11, 305 – 1059. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7
  48. Jaklitsch W. M., Fournier J., Rogers J. D., Voglmayr H. (2014). Phylogenetic and taxonomic revision of Lopadostoma. Persoonia 32, 52 – 82. doi: doi:10.3767/003158514x679272
  49. Jaklitsch W. M., Gardiennet A., Voglmayr H. (2016). Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria. Persoonia 37, 82 – 105. doi: doi:10.3767/003158516x690475
  50. Jaklitsch W. M., Voglmayr H. (2012). Phylogenetic relationships of five genera of Xylariales and Rosasphaeria gen. nov. (Hypocreales). Fungal Divers. 52, 75 – 98. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0104-2
  51. Jayanetti D. R., Yue Q., Bills G. F., Strobel G. A. (2014). Hypocoprins a–c: New sesquiterpenoids from the coprophilous fungus Hypocopra rostrata. J. Nat. Prod. 78, 396 – 401. doi: doi:10.1021/np5007718
  52. Johnston P. R., Rogers J. D., Park D., Jones E. B. G. (2016). Entalbostroma erumpens gen. et sp. nov. (Xylariaceae) from Phormium in New Zealand. Mycotaxon 131, 765 – 771. doi: doi:10.5248/131.765
  53. Ju Y., Rogers J. D. (1996). “ A revision of the genus Hypoxylon,” in Mycologia Memoir (APS Press, St. Paul), 1 – 365.
  54. Karunarathna A., Działak P., Jayawardena R. S., Hyde K. D. (2021). A novel addition to the Pezizellaceae (Rhytismatales, Ascomycota). Phytotaxa 480, 251 – 261. doi: doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.480.3.4
  55. Katoh K., Misawa K., Kuma K., Miyata T. (2002). MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059 – 3066. doi: doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436
  56. Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K. D. (2019). MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1160 – 1166. doi: doi:10.1093/bib/bbx108
  57. Kim D., Langmead B., Salzberg S. L. (2015). HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357 – 360. doi: doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317
  58. Klaysuban A., Sakayaroj J., Jones E. B. G. (2014). An additional marine fungal lineage in the Diatrypaceae, Xylariales: Pedumispora rhizophorae. Bot. Mar. 57, 413 – 420. doi: doi:10.1515/bot-2014-0017
  59. Konta S., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Senanayake I. C., Hyde K. D. (2020). A new genus Allodiatrype, five new species and a new host record of diatrypaceous fungi from palms (Arecaceae). Mycosphere 11, 239 – 268. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/4
  60. Kornsakulkarn J., Saepua S., Suvannakad R., Isaka M. (2017). Cytotoxic tropolones from the fungus Nemania sp. BCC 30850. Tetrahedron 73, 3505 – 3512. doi: doi:10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.030
  61. Kumar S., Stecher G., Suleski M., Hedges S. B. (2017). TimeTree: a resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1812 – 1819. doi: doi:10.1093/molbev/msx116
  62. Lambert C., Wendt L., Hladki A. I., Sir E. B., Stadler M. (2019). Hypomontagnella (Hypoxylaceae): a new genus segregated from Hypoxylon by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Mycol. Prog. 18, 187 – 201. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-018-1452-z
  63. Li W. J., McKenzie E. H. C., Liu J. K., Bhat D. J., Dai D. Q., Hyde K. D. (2020). Taxonomy and phylogeny of hyaline-spored coelomycetes. Fungal Divers. 100, 279 – 801. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00440-y
  64. Li D. W., Schultes N. P., Chen J. Y., Hyde K. D. (2017). Circinotrichum sinense, a new asexual fungus from Hubei, China. Botany 95, 1099 – 1108. doi: doi:10.1139/cjb-2017-0132
  65. Liu J. K., Hyde K. D., Jones E. Y., Ariyawansa H. A., Bhat D. J., Boonmee S.. (2015). Fungal diversity notes 1–110: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Divers. 72, 1 – 197. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y
  66. Liu P. G., Wang X. H., Yu F. Q., Yang Z. L. (2009). Fungous kingdom: yunnan of China and her ectomycorrhizal macrofungal species diversity. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 16, 15 – 20.
  67. Liu Y. J., Whelen S., Hall B. D. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1799 – 1808. doi: doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092
  68. Lloyd C. G. (1917). “ Synopsis of some genera of the large Pyrenomycetes: Camillea, Thamnomyces, Engleromyces,” in Hard Press Publishing. (Ohio: Cincinnati) 1 – 39.
  69. Long Q., Liu L. L., Zhang X., Hyde K. D. (2019). Contributions to species of Xylariales in China-1. Durotheca species. Mycol. Prog. 18, 495 – 510. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-018-1458-6
  70. Ma X., Chomnunti P., Doilom M., Hyde K. D. (2022). Multigene phylogeny reveals endophytic Xylariales novelties from Dendrobium species from southwestern China and northern Thailand. J. Fungi 8, 248. doi: doi:10.3390/jof8030248
  71. Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Hyde K. D., Perera R. H., Jones E. B. G. (2018). Acrocordiella omanensis sp. nov. (Requienellaceae, Xylariales) from the Sultanate of Oman. Phytotaxa 338, 294 – 294. doi: doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.338.3.7
  72. Mapook A., Hyde K. D., McKenzie E. H. C., Jones E. B. G., Bhat D. J. (2020). Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Divers. 101, 1 – 175. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8
  73. Marincowitz S., Crous P. W., Groenewald J. Z., Wingfield M. J. (2008). “ Microfungi occurring on Proteaceae in the fynbos,” in Cbs-Knaw Fungal Biodiversity Centre. (Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre).
  74. Mesny F., Miyauchi S., Thiergart T., Pickel B., Atanasova L., Karlsson M.. (2021). Genetic determinants of endophytism in the Arabidopsis root mycobiome. Nat. Commun. 12, 7227. doi: doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27479-y
  75. Mirabolfathy M., Ju Y. M., Hsieh H. M., Asgari B. (2013). Obolarina persica sp. nov. associated with dying Quercus in Iran. Mycoscience 54, 315 – 320. doi: doi:10.1016/j.myc.2012.11.003
  76. Miyauchi S., Kiss E., Kuo A., Drula E., Kohler A., Sánchez-García M.. (2020). Large-scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits. Nat. Commun. 11, 5125. doi: doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18795-w
  77. Nylander J. A. A. (2004). “ MrModeltest version 2. Program distributed by the author,” in Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. (Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre).
  78. O'Donnell K., Cigelnik E. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 103 – 116. doi: doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0376
  79. Okane I., Nakagiri A., Ito T. (2001). Surculiseries rugispora gen. et sp. nov. a new endophytic mitosporic fungus from leaves of Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Mycoscience 42, 115 – 122. doi: doi:10.1007/bf02463984
  80. Pažoutová S., Šrůtka P., Holuša J., Fournier J. (2012). Liberomyces gen. nov. with two new species of endophytic coelomycetes from broadleaf trees. Mycologia 104, 198 – 210. doi: doi:10.3852/11-081
  81. Peláez F., González V., Platas G., Martín J. (2008). Molecular phylogenetic studies within the family Xylariaceae based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Fungal Divers. 31, 111 – 134.
  82. Perera R. H., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Jones E. B. G., Hyde K. D. (2017). Delonicicola siamense gen. & sp. nov. (Delonicicolaceae fam. nov. Delonicicolales ord. nov.), a saprobic species from Delonix regia seed pods. Cryptogam. Mycol. 38, 321 – 340. doi: doi:10.7872/crym/v38.iss3.2017.321
  83. Peršoh D., Melcher M., Graf K., Fournier J. (2009). Molecular and morphological evidence for the delimitation of Xylaria hypoxylon. Mycologia 101, 256 – 268. doi: doi:10.3852/08-108
  84. Phillips R., Kibby G., Foy N., Jordan M. (2005). “ Mushrooms and other fungi of North America, Vol. 2,” in Firefly Books. (Ontario: Firefly Books Ltd), 1 – 319.
  85. Phookamsak R., Hyde K. D., Jeewon R., Bhat D. J., Jones E. B. G., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N.. (2019). Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 95, 1 – 273. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-019-00421-w
  86. Phukhamsakda C., McKenzie E. H. C., Phillips A. J. L., Jones E. B. G. (2020). Microfungi associated with Clematis (Ranunculaceae) with an integrated approach to delimiting species boundaries. Fungal Divers. 102, 1 – 203. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00448-4
  87. Porebski S., Bailey L. G., Baum B. R. (1997). Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 15, 8 – 15. doi: doi:10.1007/bf02772108
  88. Rambaut A. (2012). FigTree, version 1.4. Available online at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (Accessed February 20, 2026).
  89. Rambaut A., Drummond A. J. (2007). Tracer v1.4: MCMC Trace Analyses Tool. Available online at: http://beast.community/tracer (Accessed February 20, 2026).
  90. Ren W., Yuan Y., Peng J., Mutti L., Jiang X. (2022). The function and clinical implication of circular RNAs in lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 862602. doi: doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.862602
  91. Rogers J. D. (1979). The Xylariaceae: systematic, biological and evolutionary aspects. Mycologia 71, 1 – 42. doi: doi:10.1080/00275514.1979.12020984
  92. Rogers J. D. (1981). Sarcoxylon and entonaema (Xylariaceae). Mycologia 73, 28 – 61. doi: doi:10.1080/00275514.1981.12021319
  93. Rolshausen P. E., Mahoney N. E., Molyneux R. J., Gubler W. D. (2006). A reassessment of the species concept in Eutypa lata, the causal agent of Eutypa-dieback of grapevine. Phytopathology 96, 369 – 377. doi: doi:10.1094/phyto-96-0369
  94. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D. L., Darling A., Höhna S.. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539 – 542. doi: doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  95. Samarakoon M. C., Hyde K. D., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Jones E. B. G. (2022). Taxonomy, phylogeny, molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Divers. 112, 1 – 88. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-021-00495-5
  96. Samarakoon M. C., Hyde K. D., Promputtha I., Ariyawansa H. A., Jones E. B. G. (2016). Evolution of xylariomycetidae (Ascomycota: Sordariomycetes). Mycosphere 7, 1746 – 1761. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/9
  97. Samarakoon M. C., Thongbai B., Hyde K. D., Stadler M. (2020). Elucidation of the life cycle of the endophytic genus Muscodor and its transfer to Induratia in Induratiaceae fam. nov. based on a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Fungal Divers. 101, 177 – 210. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-020-00443-9
  98. Schoch C. L., Seifert K. A., Huhndorf S., Robert V., Spouge J. L., Levesque C. A.. (2012). Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 6241 – 6246. doi: doi:10.1073/pnas.1117018109
  99. Selosse M. A., Schneider-Maunoury L., Martos F. (2018). Time to re-think fungal ecology? Fungal ecological niches are often prejudged. New Phytol. 217, 968 – 972. doi: doi:10.1111/nph.14983
  100. Senanayake I. C., Jeewon R., Hyde K. D., Jones E. B. G. (2020 a). Taxonomy and phylogeny of Leptosillia cordylinea sp. nov. from China. Phytotaxa 435, 203 – 212. doi: doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.435.3.1
  101. Senanayake I. C., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Hyde K. D., Jones E. B. G. (2015). Towards unraveling relationships in xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Divers. 73, 73 – 144. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0340-y
  102. Senanayake I. C., Pem D., Rathnayaka A. R., Jones E. B. G. (2022). Predicting global numbers of teleomorphic ascomycetes. Fungal Divers. 114, 237 – 278. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-022-00498-w
  103. Senanayake I. C., Rathnayaka A. R., Marasinghe D. S., Jones E. B. G. (2020 b). Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11, 2678 – 2754. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20
  104. Senwanna C., Phookamsak R., Doilom M., Hyde K. D. (2017). Novel taxa of diatrypaceae from para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in northern Thailand; introducing a novel genus Allocryptovalsa. Mycosphere 8, 1835 – 1855. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/9
  105. Shang Q. J., Hyde K. D., Jeewon R., Jones E. B. G. (2018). Morpho-molecular characterization of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) with two novel species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 356, 1 – 18. doi: doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.1
  106. Shang Q.-J., Hyde K. D., Phookamsak R., Jones E. B. G. (2017). Diatrypella tectonae and Peroneutypa mackenziei sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from northern Thailand. Mycol. Prog. 16, 463 – 476. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-017-1294-0
  107. Silvestro D., Michalak I. (2012). raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 12, 335 – 337. doi: doi:10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0
  108. Simão F. A., Waterhouse R. M., Ioannidis P., Kriventseva E. V., Zdobnov E. M. (2015). BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210 – 3212. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351
  109. Sir E. B., Becker K., Lambert C., Stadler M. (2019). Observations on Texas Hypoxylons, including two new Hypoxylon species and widespread environmental isolates of the H. croceum complex identified by a polyphasic approach. Mycologia 111, 832 – 856. doi: doi:10.1080/00275514.2019.1637705
  110. Spatafora J. W., Sung G. H., Johnson D., Hesse C., O'Rourke B., Serdani M.. (2006). A five-gene phylogeny of Pezizomycotina. Mycologia 98, 1018 – 1028. doi: doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.1018
  111. Stadler M. (2011). Importance of secondary metabolites in the Xylariaceae as parameters for. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 1, 75 – 133. doi: doi:10.5943/cream/1/2/1
  112. Stadler M., Fournier J., Gardt S., Peršoh D. (2010). The phylogenetic position of Rhopalostroma as inferred from a polythetic approach. Persoonia 25, 11 – 21. doi: doi:10.3767/003158510x524231
  113. Stadler M., Læssøe T., Fournier J., Decock C. (2014). A polyphasic taxonomy of Daldinia (Xylariaceae). Stud. Mycol. 77, 1 – 143. doi: doi:10.3114/sim0016
  114. Stamatakis A., Alachiotis N. (2010). Time and memory efficient likelihood-based tree searches on phylogenomic alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics 26, i132 – i139. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq205
  115. Stanke M., Keller O., Gunduz I., Hayes A., Waack S., Morgenstern B. (2006). AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435 – W439. doi: doi:10.1093/nar/gkl200
  116. Sun H., Zhang J. W., Deng T., Boufford D. E. (2017). Origins and evolution of plants diversity in the Hengduan Mountains, China. Plant Divers. 39, 161 – 166. doi: doi:10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.001
  117. Tennakoon D. S., Kuo C. H., Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Hyde K. D. (2021). Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtis formosana, Ficus ampelas, F. septica, Macaranga tanarius and Morus australis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi. Fungal Divers. 108, 1 – 215. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-021-00474-w
  118. Thitla T., Monkai J., Meng W., Hyde K. D. (2025). Two new species of Penicillium and a new genus in Xylariomycetidae from the forest dump-sites in Chiang Mai, Thailand. MycoKeys 116, 275 – 301. doi: doi:10.3897/mycokeys.116.150635
  119. Thiyagaraja V., Senanayake I. C., Wanasinghe D. N., Hyde K. D. (2019). Phylogenetic and morphological appraisal of Diatrype lijiangensis sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from China. Asian J. Mycol. 2, 198 – 208. doi: doi:10.5943/ajom/2/1/10
  120. Tibpromma S., Daranagama D. A., Boonmee S., Hyde K. D. (2017). Anthostomelloides krabiensis gen. et sp. nov. (Xylariaceae) from Pandanus odorifer (Pandanaceae). Turk. J. Bot. 41, 107 – 116. doi: doi:10.3906/bot-1606-45
  121. Triebel D., Peršoh D., Wollweber H., Fournier J. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships among Daldinia, Entonaema, and Hypoxylon as inferred from ITS nrDNA analyses of Xylariales. Nova Hedwigia 80, 25 – 43. doi: doi:10.1127/0029-5035/2005/0080-0025
  122. Trouillas F. P., Gubler W. D. (2010). Host range, biological variation, and phylogenetic diversity of Eutypa lata in California. Phytopathology 100, 1048 – 1056. doi: doi:10.1094/phyto-02-10-0040
  123. Trouillas F. P., Hand F. P., Inderbitzin P., Gubler W. D. (2015). The genus Cryptosphaeria in the western United States: taxonomy, multilocus phylogeny and a new species, C. multicontinentalis. Mycologia 107, 1304 – 1313. doi: doi:10.3852/15-115
  124. Trouillas F. P., Pitt W. M., Sosnowski M. R., Gubler W. D. (2011). Taxonomy and DNA phylogeny of Diatrypaceae associated with Vitis vinifera and other woody plants in Australia. Fungal Divers. 49, 203 – 223. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0094-0
  125. Trouillas F. P., Úrbez-Torres J. R., Gubler W. D. (2010). Diversity of diatrypaceous fungi associated with grapevine canker diseases in California. Mycologia 102, 319 – 336. doi: doi:10.3852/08-185
  126. Úrbez-Torres J. R., Adams P., Kamas J., Gubler W. D., Leavitt G. (2009). Identification, incidence, and pathogenicity of fungal species associated with grapevine dieback in Texas. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 60, 497 – 507. doi: doi:10.5344/ajev.2009.60.4.497
  127. Vilgalys R., Hester M. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 172, 4238 – 4246. doi: doi:10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  128. Voglmayr H., Beenken L. (2020). Linosporopsis, a new leaf-inhabiting scolecosporous genus in Xylariaceae. Mycol. Prog. 19, 205 – 222. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-020-01559-7
  129. Voglmayr H., Friebes G., Gardiennet A., Jaklitsch W. M. (2018). Barrmaelia and Entosordaria in Barrmaeliaceae (fam. nov. Xylariales) and critical notes on Anthostomella-like genera based on multigene phylogenies. Mycol. Prog. 17, 155 – 177. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-017-1329-6
  130. Vu D., Groenewald M., de Vries M., Gehrmann T., Stielow B., Eberhardt U.. (2019). Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 92, 135 – 154. doi: doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001
  131. Wanasinghe D. N., Phukhamsakda C., Hyde K. D., Jones E. B. G. (2018). Fungal diversity notes 709–839: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Divers. 89, 1 – 236. doi: doi:10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7
  132. Wang L., He S. Y., Lambert C., Zhu Y. G., Zhang J. L., Yang Y.. (2026). Comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic analyses of Hymenochaetales (Basidiomycota) unveil one new genus and twenty-sixnovel wood-inhabiting species from southwestern China. Persoonia 56, 328 – 380. doi: doi:10.3114/persoonia.2026.56.05
  133. Wendt L., Sir E. B., Kuhnert E., Stadler M. (2018). Resurrection and emendation of the Hypoxylaceae, recognised from a multigene phylogeny of the Xylariales. Mycol. Prog. 17, 115 – 154. doi: doi:10.1007/s11557-017-1311-3
  134. Whalley M. A., Khalil A. M. A., Wei T. Z., Wang Y. (2010). A new species of Engleromyces from China, a second species in the genus. Mycotaxon 112, 317 – 323. doi: doi:10.5248/112.317
  135. White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. (1990). “ Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Eds. Innis M. A., Gelfand D. H., Sninsky J. J., White T. J. (Academic Press Inc, New York), 315 – 322.
  136. Wittstein K., Cordsmeier A., Lambert C., Stadler M. (2020). Identification of Rosellinia species as producers of cyclodepsipeptide PF1022 A and resurrection of the genus Dematophora as inferred from polythetic taxonomy. Stud. Mycol. 96, 1 – 16. doi: doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2020.01.001
  137. Wong T. K. F., Ly-Trong N., Ren H., Demotte P., Baños H., Roger A. J.. (2026). IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol.. 43 (5), msag117. doi: doi:10.1093/molbev/msag117
  138. Wu J., Dai T., Wang X., Hyde K. D. (2025). Molecular detection methods for forest pathogens. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 44 (2), 1 – 23. doi: doi:10.1080/07352689.2025.2489776
  139. Xie J., Chen Y., Cai G., Zhang Y. (2023). Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W587 – W592. doi: doi:10.1093/nar/gkad359
  140. Yang Z. (2007). PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586 – 1591. doi: doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088
  141. Yang Y., Xu Y., Wang L., Jiang Q. Q., Su J. Q., Li R.. (2025). Multigene phylogeny of seven wood-inhabiting fungal orders in Basidiomycota, and proposal of a new genus and thirteen new species. Mycosphere 16, 245 – 295. doi: doi:10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/4
  142. Yin Y., Mao X., Yang J., Chen X., Mao F., Xu Y. (2012). dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W445 – W451. doi: doi:10.1093/nar/gks479

Citation

Song, J., et al. (2026). Unearthing a fungal giant: Dianjunaceae fam. nov., a novel Paleocene lineage of Xylariales harboring Dianjunus rex gen. et sp. nov. Frontiers in Fungal Biology, Volume 7. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
7 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Song, Yan, Pérez-Moreno, Zhang, Yang, Xie, Su, Liu, Wang, Liu, Yang, Yang, Liu, Shi, Wan, Cheewangkoon, Dai, Senanayake and Yu.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Indunil C. Senanayake; Fuqiang Yu

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0