Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Freshwater Science ·

Volume 4 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ffwsc.2026.1776529

Drivers of fish beta diversity vary by habitat and rainfall period in temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest

  • João Henrique Alliprandini da Costa1,2*corresponding author
  • Jansen Zuanon3,4
  • Amanda Selinger5
  • Ursulla Pereira Souza2
  • Rafael Mendonça Duarte1,6
  1. 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade de Ambientes Costeiros, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – UNESP, São Vicente, Brazil
  2. 2Laboratório de Biologia de Organismos Marinhos e Costeiros, Universidade Santa Cecília – UNISANTA, Santos, Brazil
  3. 3Professor Visitante Sênior – Bolsista CAPES, Universidade Santa Cecília – UNISANTA, Santos, Brazil
  4. 4Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA, Manaus, Brazil
  5. 5Núcleo de Estudos sobre Poluição e Ecotoxicologia Aquática, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – UNESP, São Vicente, Brazil
  6. 6Laboratório de Ecofisiologia e Evolução Molecular (LEEM), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA, Manaus, Brazil
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Temporary freshwater habitats are characterized by cyclical flooding and drying that create highly dynamic conditions for fish community assembly. These environments can exhibit high spatial and temporal variability in community structure driven by local topography, distance to source habitats and interannual variation in rainfall, which affects connectivity dynamics. As such, they provide unique opportunities to test hypotheses about the processes shaping metacommunities. Here, we investigate these processes in temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest. We sampled 36 temporary pools and 36 roadside ditches throughout 2024, recording 1,545 individuals from 20 species. We tested if community composition differs between habitat type and rainfall periods and whether beta diversity components were associated with local environmental and spatial predictors. Fish community composition did not differ significantly between habitats or hydrological periods, but temporal variation in spatial beta diversity was consistently high and influenced by turnover. During the dry period, nestedness was positively correlated with differences in volume for temporary pools and roadside ditches. Additionally, during the wet period, turnover in ditches was correlated with differences in pH. In temporary pools during the wet period, turnover increased with differences in distance to the nearest stream. High turnover for both habitats and periods suggest spatial processes such as dispersal limitation and colonization history are key drivers of community structure in those temporary aquatic habitats. Nestedness correlations with differences in volume in the dry period indicate that greater habitat availability promotes species accumulation under low connectivity, where dispersal occurs possibly only by overland displacement. Meanwhile, turnover correlation with differences in pH for ditches in the wet period is consistent with mass effect dynamics under higher connectivity conditions, with pH acting as a proxy for stream water influx. Turnover correlation with differences in distance to the nearest stream for pools during the wet period suggest colonization by highly tolerant and capable of dispersal species in more isolated sites. Overall, our findings emphasize that beta diversity in temporary aquatic habitats is primarily structured by habitat availability and spatial processes interacting with hydrological dynamics, underscoring that effective conservation must target the entire floodable mosaic rather than isolated sites to maintain this dynamic metacommunity.

Keywords

Introduction

Temporary pools are key components of freshwater landscapes in tropical regions, defined by their cyclical drying and flooding regimes, which create dynamic environments for colonization, extinction and recolonization events (Williams, 2007). Despite their small size and transient nature, they can harbor high biodiversity and play critical roles in dispersal, reproduction and life cycle for several freshwater species (Blaustein and Schwartz, 2001; DiMauro and Hunter, 2002; Espírito-Santo et al., 2013). However, temporary pools are increasingly threatened by a range of anthropogenic pressures, harboring a high number of small-sized threatened fishes (Castro and Polaz, 2020). For example, habitat loss driven by road construction, urbanization and land-use change has pushed several pool-dwelling species toward extinction (Volcan and Lanés, 2018). The disappearance of natural temporary pools and the degradation of floodplains have also led some fishes to occupy roadside ditches, built along dirt roads for water drainage (Costa et al., 2024, 2025). As a result, fish communities from temporary freshwater habitats that are naturally short-lived and structured over brief hydroperiods are now also being reshaped in artificial environmental settings that may facilitate the introduction of non-native species, together with increased exposure to pollutants and warming (Hohausová et al., 2010; Costa et al., 2025).

Despite their ecological importance, studies on fish metacommunity in temporary aquatic habitats remain scarce in the Neotropical region, which harbors the richest freshwater fish fauna on the planet. Most community ecology studies have focused on seasonal and environmental variation in temporary pools from the Amazon and Pantanal biomes (Pazin et al., 2006; Espírito-Santo et al., 2013; Tondato et al., 2013; Espírito-Santo and Zuanon, 2017; Couto et al., 2018), with few assessments from the Atlantic Forest. Notably, the only study investigating a fish metacommunity in roadside ditches in the Neotropics was recently conducted in this biome (Costa et al., 2025).

Metacommunity theory provides a powerful framework for understanding how communities assemble across spatial and temporal scales (Leibold and Chase, 2017; Leibold et al., 2004). According to this theory, community assembly in metacommunities emerges from the interaction among key ecological processes, including dispersal, environmental filtering, biotic interactions and stochasticity, whose relative importance varies across spatial scales, temporal contexts and even across sites and species (Leibold et al., 2022). Different combinations of these processes give rise to distinct but non-mutually exclusive metacommunity paradigms, such as colonization-extinction dynamics, species sorting along environmental gradients, and mass effects under high connectivity. In this context, beta diversity provides a useful framework to investigate metacommunity structure by capturing spatial and temporal variation in species composition. Its partition into turnover (species replacement) and nestedness (species loss or gain) can offer insights into the relative roles of dispersal, connectivity and local constraints shaping assemblages (Baselga, 2010; Declerck et al., 2011; Legendre and De Cáceres, 2013; Legendre, 2014). These components are also relevant for conservation, as high turnover implies spatial complementarity among sites, whereas nestedness may indicate prioritization of species-rich locations (Socolar et al., 2016).

Temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest are not only valuable systems for exploring and understanding the components and drivers of beta diversity but also serve as replicable models for conserving metacommunities. In these fragmented environments, species richness is shaped by factors such as pool volume and proximity to permanent water bodies (Pazin et al., 2006), parallel to the principles of island biogeography theory proposed by MacArthur and Wilson (1967). As landscapes become increasingly fragmented, gaining insight into beta diversity patterns in such temporary and extreme aquatic habitats becomes critical, as may represent the new reality for other climate-vulnerable ecosystems in the future (Comte and Olden, 2017).

In this study we investigated how fish community composition and temporal variation in spatial beta diversity components (turnover and nestedness) act across two habitat types and hydrological periods in temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest. Our focus was on temporary pools and roadside ditches fish communities in a blackwater sub-basin located in the coastal plains of southeastern Brazil. The region harbors a high endemism resulting from its geographic isolation, bounded by the Atlantic Ocean and coastal mountain ranges that restrict species dispersal between basins (Menezes et al., 2007; Giongo et al., 2023). We also evaluated how local environmental conditions and spatial isolation influence patterns of species turnover and nestedness.

Reduced hydrological connectivity during the dry period strongly limits dispersal among temporary freshwater habitats, restricting movement largely to fish species capable of overland displacement. Under such low-connectivity conditions, local habitat availability, represented by water volume, is expected to play a central role in structuring communities by influencing persistence and species accumulation. At the same time, physicochemical variables are unlikely to act as strong filters at the present ecological scale, as fish assemblages in these systems are already selectively filtered for tolerance to extreme and fluctuating conditions, a pattern previously reported for temporary aquatic habitats in Central Amazonia (Pazin et al., 2006). Based on these premises, we hypothesized that, during the dry period, beta diversity components would be primarily correlated with water volume in both pools and ditches. In contrast, during the wet period, enhanced connectivity among habitats promotes dispersal and homogenizes environmental conditions across sites, as observed in highly connected floodplain systems such as the Okavango Delta (Bokhutlo et al., 2021). Based on this expectation, we predicted that, during the wet period, none of the measured predictors would be correlated with beta diversity components, especially in pools, since they are highly connected by the flooded forest.

Material and methods

Study area and sampling

Sampling was conducted in the Preto River sub-basin, part of the Itanhaém River basin, within the coastal Atlantic Forest of São Paulo State, Brazil (Figure 1A). This coastal plain region is characterized by sandy-clay substrates, restinga vegetation, and blackwater streams with high dissolved organic carbon (rich in humic substances), low pH and low dissolved oxygen (Camargo and Cancian, 2016; Supplementary Table S1). From January to December 2024, 36 temporary pools (Figure 1B) and 36 roadside ditches (Figure 1C) were sampled, with three distinct sites of each habitat type surveyed monthly. This sampling effort was defined based on environmental permits issued by governmental authorities, which limited the number of sites that could be sampled per month to minimize disturbance to populations of threatened species.

**(A)** Study area in the Preto River sub-basin, within the Itanhaém River Basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Green circles represent temporary pools and brown triangles represent roadside ditches. Insets I and II highlight clusters of habitats located in the lowest and most flood-prone sections of the sub-basin. **(B)** Example of a temporary pool within forested *restinga* vegetation. **(C)** Example of a roadside ditch.
Figure 1. (A) Study area in the Preto River sub-basin, within the Itanhaém River Basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Green circles represent temporary pools and brown triangles represent roadside ditches. Insets I and II highlight clusters of habitats located in the lowest and most flood-prone sections of the sub-basin. (B) Example of a temporary pool within forested restinga vegetation. (C) Example of a roadside ditch.

A given site, or another within the same temporarily flooded area, was only resampled in a later month if it had undergone complete drying followed by reflooding, or complete reconnection with adjacent streams. Based on this criterion, a limited number of sites were resampled across the study period, with most locations sampled only once, and a subset of sites resampled between two and six times across different months (on average, each site was sampled 1.75 times, that is, close to two times). This criterion, following Costa et al. (2025), ensured temporal independence among sampling events by requiring complete habitat resetting between surveys, either through full drying or hydrological reconnection with surrounding floodable areas and streams. As a result, fish communities were able to reassemble through natural recolonization, minimizing carryover effects from previous sampling.

Fish were sampled for 15 min at each site by two researchers using hand nets (50 × 40 cm, 1 mm mesh), following Costa et al. (2025), and actively sweeping the entire flooded area. Sampling effort was standardized across sites and was sufficient to cover the whole extent of each habitat, which consisted of shallow and spatially restricted pools and ditches, with maximum lengths ranging from < 1 to ~58 m, widths from < 1 to ~10 m, and depths typically below 30 cm. Given the small size and shallow nature of these habitats, this effort allowed rapid detection of species present at each site. Captured individuals were euthanised with eugenol (1–1.5 ml L−1), fixed in 10% formalin for 48 h, and preserved in 70% ethanol. All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Use at São Paulo State University (UNESP – IB/CLP, protocol no. 15/2023) and authorized under SISBIO license 90241-1. Species were identified and voucher specimens were deposited in the Fish Collection of UNESP in São José do Rio Preto (DZSJRP).

At each site, we measured environmental variables including maximum pool length, width, and depth (in meters) using a fiberglass measuring tape. Pool or ditch volume (m3) was estimated assuming a half-ellipsoid shape. Water temperature (°C), pH and dissolved oxygen (mg·L−1) were measured in situ, before fish sampling, using a portable multiprobe (Hanna HI98194); these three variables were selected for their ecological relevance in temporary habitats, where exposure to direct sunlight and the absence of water flow can lead to thermal and oxygen extremes. The distance from each sampling site to the nearest permanent stream was measured as the straight-line distance, expressed in meters. Distances were obtained using high-resolution satellite imagery in Google Maps and, when sites were sufficiently close to streams, were measured in the field using a fiberglass measuring tape during sampling. Sampling months were grouped into: wet (November-March) and the dry (April–October) periods, based on regional rainfall patterns described in Costa et al. (2025). It is important to note that despite there being strong differences in precipitation between these periods (Costa et al., 2025), there is rain in both periods (see monthly water volume per aquatic habitat in Supplementary Figure S1), typical of the humid coastal plains of southeastern Brazil. Summary statistics (range, mean, standard deviation) for each environmental variable per habitat type and period are provided in Supplementary Table S1, together with the number of sites sampled per habitat-period combination.

Data analysis

To assess variation in fish assemblage composition across habitats and hydrological periods, we performed a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities calculated from species abundance data (counts). Differences in fish community composition between habitat types (temporary pools and roadside ditches) and hydrological periods (wet and dry) were tested using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). Analyses were conducted using two complementary data structures: (i) abundance-based matrices (“count”), using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities to account for differences in species abundances; and (ii) presence–absence matrices (“pa”), using Jaccard dissimilarities to assess compositional differences independent of abundance. For each data structure, we also tested the homogeneity of multivariate dispersion among groups using PERMDISP, ensuring that any detected differences in community composition were not driven by unequal within-group variability. All tests were performed with 999 permutations.

Beta diversity was further quantified using the Sørensen dissimilarity index, which was partitioned into its turnover and nestedness components using the betapart R package (Baselga and Orme, 2012). All analyses were performed separately for each habitat-period combination using presence–absence data. To explore the drivers of beta diversity components, we calculated pairwise Euclidean distances for selected predictors. Temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH were used to represent potential environmental filtering; volume was considered a proxy for habitat availability; and distance to the nearest stream was used as a proxy for spatial isolation. These predictor dissimilarity matrices were related to pairwise beta diversity components (turnover and nestedness) using partial Mantel tests, accounting for spatial autocorrelation by controlling for geographic distance among sites, with 999 permutations. All statistical analyses were performed in R.

Results

A total of 1,545 individuals were sampled, with 758 individuals in temporary pools and 787 in roadside ditches, among a total of 20 species. Of these, 18 species occurred in pools and 17 in ditches. In temporary pools, 199 individuals and 12 species were recorded during the wet period, whereas 559 individuals and 16 species were recorded during the dry period. In roadside ditches, 333 individuals and 16 species were sampled during the wet period, and 454 individuals and 12 species during the dry period. The most abundant species in temporary pools were Mimagoniates lateralis (Nichols, 1913) (n = 281), Atlantirivulus peruibensis Ywamoto, Nielsen, and Oliveira, 2025 (n = 157), Hyphessobrycon boulengeri (Eigenmann, 1907) (n = 92) and Phalloceros reisi Lucinda, 2008 (n = 79). In roadside ditches, the dominant species were A. peruibensis (n = 212), H. boulengeri (n = 131), P. reisi (n = 104), Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859 (n = 77) and Hyphessobrycon bifasciatus Ellis, 1911 (n = 72) (Table 1). Non-native species, P. reticulata was exclusive to roadside ditches, while Nannostomus beckfordi Günther, 1872 occurred in both aquatic habitats, but mainly in ditches. A single specimen of Hoplosternum littorale (Hancock, 1828) also occurred in a roadside ditch; however, its origin as native or non-native to the southeastern Brazil basins is not fully understood yet. In addition, we recorded three endangered species: Leptopanchax itanhaensis (Costa, 2008), classified as Critically Endangered, and more abundant on roadside ditches than in temporary pools (Table 1); Rachoviscus crassiceps Myers, 1926 and M. lateralis, both classified as Vulnerable, the first more abundant in ditches and the second in pools. Fish assemblage composition did not differ significantly between habitats or across sampling periods when considering both count and presence-absence data (PERMANOVAcount: F3, 68 = 1.333, p = 0.085; PERMDISPcount: F3, 68 = 0.292, p = 0.831; PERMANOVApa: F3, 68 = 1.51, p = 0.07; PERMDISPpa: F3, 68 = 0.05, p = 0.98; Figure 2).

Table 1. Species recorded in temporary pools (TP) and roadside ditches (RD) of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil.

Orders and familiesSpeciesTPRDVoucher DZSJRP
Characiformes
StevardiidaeMimagoniates lateralis (Nichols, 1913)2816225,059
AcestrorhamphidaeHyphessobrycon boulengeri (Eigenmann, 1907)9213125,058
Hyphessobrycon bifasciatus Ellis, 191117225,070
Rachoviscus crassiceps Myers, 19267923,340
Hollandichthys multifasciatus (Eigenmann and Norris, 1900)41125,062
CrenuchidaeCharacidium lanei Travassos, 19674025,061
ErythrinidaeHoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794)2825,065
LebiasinidaeNannostomus beckfordi Günther, 1872*33525,069
Cichliformes
CichlidaeGeophagus iporangensis Haseman, 191112425,066
Cyprinodontiformes
PoeciliidaePhalloceros reisi Lucinda, 20087910425,064
Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859*07725,068
RivulidaeAtlantirivulus peruibensis Ywamoto, Nielsen and Oliveira, 202515721225,056
Leptopanchax itanhaensis (Costa, 2008)11324,845; 24,846
Gymnotiformes
GymnotidaeGymnotus pantherinus (Steindachner, 1908)25025,067
Siluriformes
CallichthyidaeCallichthys callichthys (Linnaeus, 1758)94925,057
Hoplosternum littorale (Hancock, 1828)*0125,173
Scleromystax macropterus (Regan, 1913)35125,060
LoricariidaePseudotothyris obtusa (Miranda Ribeiro, 1911)6625,073
HeptapteridaeAcentronichthys leptos Eigenmann and Eigenmann, 18892025,071
Synbranchiformes
SynbranchidaeSynbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 17951225,072

Voucher specimens are deposited in the DZSJRP collection of UNESP.

*non-native species.

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of fish species abundance data, showing assemblage structure across habitat type and sampling period in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Convex hulls represent the multivariate space occupied by each group. Points (sites) may overlap in coordinates due to similar species composition.
Figure 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of fish species abundance data, showing assemblage structure across habitat type and sampling period in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Convex hulls represent the multivariate space occupied by each group. Points (sites) may overlap in coordinates due to similar species composition.

Beta diversity was high in all groups (βS*rensen* ≥ 0.86), with species turnover as the dominant component (βturnover ≥ 0.71) and a smaller contribution from nestedness (βnestedness ≤ 0.18). This pattern was consistent across habitats and hydrological periods (Figure 3). Water volume was significantly correlated with nestedness in both temporary pools and roadside ditches during the dry period (temporary pools: r = 0.44, p = 0.001; roadside ditches: r = 0.21, p = 0.009; Figure 4). Differences in distance to the nearest stream were positively correlated with turnover in temporary pools during the wet period (r = 0.39, p = 0.02; Figure 4). A significant correlation was also found between differences in pH and species turnover in roadside ditches during the wet period (r = 0.33, p = 0.002; Figure 4). No significant correlation was detected between pairwise beta diversity components and differences in temperature or dissolved oxygen across habitats or hydrological periods (Table 2).

Partitioning of beta diversity (Sørensen index) into turnover and nestedness components for fish assemblages in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil.
Figure 3. Partitioning of beta diversity (Sørensen index) into turnover and nestedness components for fish assemblages in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil.
Significant relationships between predictors distances and pairwise beta diversity components in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. **(A)** Positive correlation between difference in distance to nearest stream and turnover in temporary pools during the wet period. **(B)** Positive correlation between difference in volume and nestedness in temporary pools during the dry period. **(C)** Positive correlation between difference in pH and turnover in roadside ditches during the wet period. **(D)** Positive relationship between differences in water volume and nestedness in roadside ditches during the dry period. Dashed lines represent linear trends for visualization.
Figure 4. Significant relationships between predictors distances and pairwise beta diversity components in temporary freshwater habitats of the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil. (A) Positive correlation between difference in distance to nearest stream and turnover in temporary pools during the wet period. (B) Positive correlation between difference in volume and nestedness in temporary pools during the dry period. (C) Positive correlation between difference in pH and turnover in roadside ditches during the wet period. (D) Positive relationship between differences in water volume and nestedness in roadside ditches during the dry period. Dashed lines represent linear trends for visualization.

Table 2. Partial Mantel test results showing correlations (r) and associated p-values between pairwise beta diversity components (turnover and nestedness) and predictors dissimilarities (temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, volume and distance to the nearest stream), while controlling for spatial distance among sites, across habitat and sampling period of temporary freshwater habitats from the Preto River sub-basin, in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil.

Mantel outputPOOLSDITCHES
WetDryWetDry
(1) Turnover
(a) Temperature
Mantel r0.230.050.150.05
p-value0.060.260.170.28
(b) Dissolved oxygen
Mantel r−0.18−0.14−0.10−0.04
p-value0.870.870.770.55
(c) pH
Mantel r−0.19−0.230.33−0.09
p-value0.890.990.0020.83
(d) Volume
Mantel r−0.01−0.350.02−0.14
p-value0.380.990.390.87
(e) Stream distance
Mantel r0.390.08−0.130.09
p-value0.020.260.750.22
(2) Nestedness
(a) Temperature
Mantel r−0.10−0.09−0.05−0.06
p-value0.750.880.630.77
(b) Dissolved oxygen
Mantel r0.140.0800.04
p-value0.180.220.500.37
(c) pH
Mantel r0.110.16−0.240.02
p-value0.240.0550.990.43
(d) Volume
Mantel r0.070.440.080.21
p-value0.350.0010.320.009
(e) Stream distance
Mantel r−0.24−0.090.11−0.06
p-value0.960.800.190.70

Significant results (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.

Discussion

Our study represents the first effort to investigate beta diversity components of fish in temporary pools and roadside ditches of the Atlantic Forest. It also provides the first report of fish communities in temporary pools from this biome, complementing recent findings on roadside ditches (Costa et al., 2025). We found a similar total number of individuals and species in both habitat types throughout the year, with A. peruibensis emerging as the second most abundant species in pools and the most abundant in ditches. This aligns with the species' highly amphibious lifestyle, including high emersion tolerance and terrestrial locomotion via leaping, which facilitates both escape from predators and colonization of new temporary habitats, as evidenced in other Rivulidae species (Espírito-Santo et al., 2019). However, in the pools, A. peruibensis was outnumbered by M. lateralis, a typical stream-dwelling tetra endemic from the region (Moraes et al., 2021; Selinger et al., 2025), that occurs mainly in large schools in floodplain pools, with up to 90 individuals recorded at a single site.

We found no significant differences in species composition between habitat types or hydrological periods, regardless of their origin (natural or man-made) or seasonal variation. This pattern is consistent with findings from temporary aquatic systems in subtropical Africa, where hydrological regimes act as major drivers of community structure and increased connectivity during wet periods promotes assemblage homogenization (Bokhutlo et al., 2021). In addition, in southeastern Brazil, the dry period includes unregular rainfall events, and not all pools or ditches dry synchronously and completely, as evidenced in Supplementary Figure S1. The presence of P. reticulata, a non-native species introduced for mosquito control and known for its broad environmental tolerance (Silva et al., 2023), together with N. beckfordi, a species native to the Amazon basin that has been widely exported as an ornamental fish and introduced in various regions (Magalhães et al., 2019), with both species occurring mostly in ditches, is of particular concern. Another noteworthy species is H. littorale, recorded by a single individual in a roadside ditch; its native or non-native status in southeastern Brazil remains uncertain, as regional records are recent (Reis, 1997; Ferreira and Petrere, 2009), and the species is already reported as non-native in other Brazilian river basins (Moreira et al., 2023), suggesting a possible recent dispersal to coastal systems.

Our findings demonstrate that fish beta diversity in temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest is consistently high and predominantly driven by species turnover, regardless of habitat type or hydrological period. This indicates that species replacement is the primary process structuring fish assemblages across space and time in these systems. Although turnover is often associated with environmental filtering and biotic interactions (Legendre and De Cáceres, 2013), previous studies in temporary aquatic environments (Pazin et al., 2006; Bokhutlo et al., 2021; Costa et al., 2025), together with our results, suggest that instantaneous physicochemical conditions such as temperature and dissolved oxygen are weak predictors of compositional change when measured at the site scale. While we acknowledge that diel variation in these variables was not explicitly quantified, the lack of consistent relationships indicates that short-term limnological fluctuations are unlikely to be the primary drivers of beta diversity patterns observed here, as expected by species sorting operating at evolutionary or historical scales (Jovanovska et al., 2022). Instead, habitat availability and spatial isolation, represented by water volume and distance to the nearest stream, emerged as more relevant drivers.

This pattern is consistent with our hypothesis that environmental conditions would have limited influence on beta diversity components, with the sole exception of roadside ditches during the wet period, where differences in pH were positively correlated with turnover. Rather than reflecting species sorting through environmental filtering, this relationship seems to indicate seasonal mass-effect dynamics, in which recurrent rainfall pulses and temporarily increased hydrological connectivity during the wet period allow species with good dispersal capacities to occupy habitats with less acidic pH levels that are otherwise suboptimal and atypical for the basin. These conditions do not seem to exclude acid-tolerant taxa, what would be expected in an environmental filter, as species such as L. itanhaensis, M. lateralis and R. crassiceps, typically found in pools (Costa et al., 2024) and streams (Ferreira et al., 2014; Giongo et al., 2023) with highly acidic waters, were recorded with considerable abundance (Table 1) in roadside ditches, typically with higher pH values due to higher distance to blackwater streams and more rainfall water input (Costa et al., 2025). In addition, for temporary pools during the wet period, turnover increased with differences in distance to the nearest stream, suggesting spatially structured colonization from distinct source habitats. This pattern likely reflects a differentiation between pool-dwelling taxa occurring farther from streams and stream-associated taxa occurring closer to streams, as flooded areas may be supplied by different sources. Thus, stream-dwelling species may enter pools via flood pulses, whereas pool-adapted taxa likely persist along marginal flooded habitats and avoid being transported to streams as water recedes, consistent with colonization by highly tolerant and dispersal-capable taxa in more isolated pools. However, it is important to emphasize that this wet-period pattern was detected in the year sampled and may vary with inter-annual climatic variation, especially precipitation intensity and flood extent; long-term monitoring is needed to test the consistency of these relationships in metacommunity structuring, and if its consistent between sites and species with distinct dispersal capacity traits (Leibold et al., 2022).

During the dry period, competitive exclusion may play a more immediate role than environmental conditions or colonization source distance. This pattern was evident in both temporary pools and roadside ditches, where differences in water volume were significantly correlated with nestedness, supporting our hypothesis that habitat availability modulates species accumulation under low connectivity in both environments. Under such conditions, dispersal is likely restricted to a limited subset of species with functional traits that confer tolerance to emersion or hypoxia/anoxia. In our system, this potential is most evident in A. peruibensis, a highly amphibious and abundant species able of short-distance terrestrial locomotion, as well as in C. callichthys and H. littorale, which can move across moist substrates and rely on facultative air-breathing. Other species, such as L. itanhaensis, S. marmoratus and P. reisi, may tolerate brief desiccation or air exposure, but are unlikely to sustain active overland dispersal. Therefore, any contribution of terrestrial displacement to metacommunity dynamics during dry periods should be viewed as limited to a few functionally specialized taxa.

In this context, smaller sites tend to harbor subsets of species present in larger ones, consistent with nestedness driven by volume-mediated constraints on coexistence. While roadside ditches generally retain water for longer periods than temporary pools (Costa et al., 2025), variation in ditch volume during the dry season still appears sufficient to structure assemblages, likely reflecting differences in microhabitat availability and carrying capacity, which can constrain the number of species that co-occur locally. This can be expected since increased habitat availability is often associated with greater opportunities for niche differentiation and species accumulation, promoting coexistence at the site level, as suggested by classical niche theory (Taylor, 1997; Spencer et al., 1999). However, inferring competitive interactions among co-occurring species would require approaches such as joint species distribution modeling to investigate the metacommunity internal structure, that is, how these factors operate at site and species level (Leibold et al., 2022). Meanwhile, smaller temporary freshwater habitats likely support only highly amphibious or tolerant species, such as A. peruibensis (Costa et al., 2025), with a selective loss of species. Thus, even in these more persistent artificial habitats, reduced water availability during dry periods may intensify biotic interactions and promote nested patterns in community composition.

In summary, our study provides novel insights into beta diversity components of fish metacommunities inhabiting temporary freshwater habitats, showing that species turnover consistently predominates across both natural and man-made environments, regardless of hydrological season. This pattern highlights the central role of spatial and niche processes, particularly dispersal limitation, episodic connectivity and habitat availability, in structuring communities in dynamic freshwater systems. While environmental filtering via physicochemical variables appears weak, our results indicate that mass effects and local habitat features, such as habitat availability and spatial isolation relative to permanent water bodies, can modulate species replacement and nestedness, especially during periods of reduced connectivity. Although pure spatial distance among sites is also known to strongly influence community dissimilarity in temporary freshwater systems (Costa et al., 2025), our findings emphasize that habitat-related and connectivity-driven processes operate on top of this underlying spatial structure. Together, these results reinforce the importance of considering temporary freshwater habitats as spatially dynamic mosaics in community assembly, a perspective that is broadly applicable to seasonal aquatic ecosystems worldwide.

Implications for conservation

The consistently high turnover observed across temporary habitats readily suggests that conservation strategies should focus on protecting multiple sites rather than prioritizing only species-rich locations (Socolar et al., 2016). However, applying this principle to temporary pools and roadside ditches is challenging due to their inherently dynamic nature. Pools and water-filled ditches can form, dry, and reappear in different locations, with distant shapes and volumes. This spatial and temporal variability implies that protecting isolated sites is unfeasible. Instead, conservation efforts should target the entire floodable mosaic within a basin or sub-basin, encompassing the naturally floodable forest areas where these habitats form and reconfigure over time. Such a systemic approach is particularly urgent in the Preto River sub-basin, since Brazilian Law 12.651/2012 (Art. 61-A) (the so-called Brazilian Forest Code) designates Permanent Preservation Areas only along narrow strips, 20 to 30 meters on each side for small streams (< 10 m of width), intended to protect water resources and biodiversity. This legal framework, even if strictly enforced, would fail to safeguard many pools that arise beyond these strips in floodable forests, as well as virtually all fish assemblages inhabiting roadside ditches along dirt roads. This gap reveals the inadequacy of current regulations to encompass the ecological reality of temporary freshwater habitats both in pristine and anthropogenically altered landscapes.

A more ambitious conservation strategy is needed, that explicitly recognizes temporary habitats as integral components of coastal freshwater systems. This could involve expanding the width of legally protected floodplain vegetation to include the full inundation zone of basins, effectively buffering both natural and man-made temporary sites. In the case of roadside ditches, management actions should focus on monitoring and preventing the spread of non-native species, while also avoiding road paving or ditch channelization, which would disrupt their role as temporary refugia and recolonization sources during extreme periods. Although this study focuses on a single sub-basin, extending similar assessments to other coastal basins is essential. Given the high turnover observed within and likely between basins, a network of smaller protected areas across multiple basins may be more effective than concentrating protection within a single large area, as it would better capture the spatial complementarity of fish metacommunities in temporary freshwater habitats. Such an approach not only aligns with the ecological patterns observed but also challenges the current scope of the Forest Code, highlighting the need to revise or reinterpret existing legal instruments to ensure the conservation of these dynamic and overlooked environments.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffwsc.2026.1776529/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Davide Taurozzi, Roma Tre University, Italy

Reviewed by: Maria Filomena Magalhães, University of Lisbon, Portugal

Swann Felin, National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (IRSTEA), France

Andre Martins, Seduc Amazonas, Brazil

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was financed, in part, by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brasil. Process Number #2023/14344-5, by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 and by INCT ADAPTA III funded by CNPq – Brazilian National Research Council (409202/2024-0) and CAPES – Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. We also thank the PDPG/CAPES Process Number #88881.709630/2022-01 due to the funding of some expeditions. JZ receives a Senior Researcher grant from CAPES (Program for Reducing Asymmetries in Graduate Studies (PRAPG) – No. 14/2023, #88887.964979/2024-00).

Data availability

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: the step-by-step analysis is available in R code, along with the raw data, in a Git Hub repository (https://github.com/JH-All/ephemeral_aquatic_habitats).

Ethics approval

The animal study was approved by Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais - CEUA, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Biociências, Câmpus do Litoral Paulista, São Vicente, Brazil. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

JC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft. US: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. RD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank everyone on the team who helped during the fieldwork, and Antônio Carlos (Tuca) who welcomed us into his home monthly to develop the fieldwork.

References

  1. Baselga A. (2010). Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134 – 143. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
  2. Baselga A., Orme C. D. L. (2012). Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 808 – 812. doi: doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
  3. Blaustein L., Schwartz S. S. S. (2001). Why study ecology in temporary pools? Isr. J. Zool. 47, 303 – 312. doi: doi:10.1092/CKMU-Q2PM-HTGC-P9C8
  4. Bokhutlo T., Cunha E. R., Winemiller K O. (2021). Ephemeral habitat supports high fish α-diversity and β-diversity during drought in a subtropical semiarid wetland. Biotropica 53, 778 – 785. doi: doi:10.1111/btp.12937
  5. Camargo A. F. M., Cancian L. F. (2016). “Ecologia da bacia do rio Itanhaém: características limnológicas e uso do solo,” in Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em bacias hidrográficas, eds. M. E. B. Moraes and R. Lorandi (Editus, Ilhéus), 197 – 218.
  6. Castro R. M. C., Polaz C. N. M. (2020). Small-sized fish: the largest and most threatened portion of the megadiverse neotropical freshwater fish fauna. Biota Neotrop. 20: e20180683. doi: doi:10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0683
  7. Comte L., Olden J. D. (2017). Climatic vulnerability of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 718 – 722. doi: doi:10.1038/nclimate3382
  8. Costa J. H. A., Selinger A., Langeani F., Souza U. P., Duarte R. M. (2025). Life on the road: fish communities composition in roadside ditches of the Atlantic forest. Neotropical Ichthyology, 23: e250117. doi: doi:10.1590/1982-0224-2025-0117
  9. Costa J. H. A., Souza U. P., Selinger A., Vidal T. A., Langeani F., Duarte R. M. (2024). Rediscovery of the critically endangered annual killifish Leptopanchax itanhaensis (Costa, 2008) in a temporary pool and roadside ditch from the Atlantic forest of Southeast Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 24:e20241637. doi: doi:10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2024-1637
  10. Couto T. B. A., Zuanon J., Olden J. D., Ferraz G. (2018). Longitudinal variability in lateral hydrologic connectivity shapes fish occurrence in temporary floodplain ponds. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 75, 319 – 328. doi: doi:10.1139/cjfas-2016-0388
  11. Declerck S. A. J., Coronel J. S., Legendre P., Brendonck L. (2011). Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High-Andes wetlands. Ecography 34, 296 – 305. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06462.x
  12. DiMauro D., Hunter M. L. (2002). Reproduction of amphibians in natural and anthropogenic temporary pools in managed forests. Forest Sci. 48, 397 – 406. doi: doi:10.1093/forestscience/48.2.397
  13. Espírito-Santo H. M. V., Rodríguez M. A., Zuanon J. (2013). Reproductive strategies of Amazonian stream fishes and their fine-scale use of habitat are ordered along a hydrological gradient. Freshw. Biol. 58, 2494 – 2504. doi: doi:10.1111/fwb.12225
  14. Espírito-Santo H. M. V., Sodré J. G., Zuanon J. (2019). He leaps, she beats: The role of social interactions on the overland movements of an Amazonian amphibious killifish. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 28, 356 – 364. doi: doi:10.1111/eff.12458
  15. Espírito-Santo H. M. V., Zuanon J. (2017). Temporary pools provide stability to fish assemblages in Amazon headwater streams. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 26, 475 – 483. doi: doi:10.1111/eff.12292
  16. Ferreira F. C., da Silva A. T., Gonçalves C. da S., Petrere M. (2014). Disentangling the influences of habitat structure and limnological predictors on stream fish communities of a coastal basin, southeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 12, 177 – 186. doi: doi:10.1590/S1679-62252014000100019
  17. Ferreira F. C., Petrere M. (2009). The fish zonation of the Itanhaém river basin in the Atlantic Forest of southeast Brazil. Hydrobiologia 636, 11 – 34. doi: doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9932-4
  18. Giongo M. L., Petesse M. L., Esteves K. E. (2023). Fish responses to multiple scales in coastal blackwater Atlantic Forest streams in Southeast Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 21: e230030. doi: doi:10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0030
  19. Hohausová E., Lavoy R. J., Allen M. S. (2010). Fish dispersal in a seasonal wetland: Influence of anthropogenic structures. Mar. Freshw. Res. 61, 682 – 694. doi: doi:10.1071/MF09140
  20. Jovanovska E., Hauffe T., Stelbrink B., Cvetkoska A., Levkov Z., Wagner B.. (2022). Environmental filtering drives assembly of diatom communities over evolutionary time-scales. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 954 – 967. doi: doi:10.1111/geb.13471
  21. Legendre P. (2014). Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1324 – 1334. doi: doi:10.1111/geb.12207
  22. Legendre P., De Cáceres M. (2013). Beta diversity as the variance of community data: Dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol. Lett. 16, 951 – 963. doi: doi:10.1111/ele.12141
  23. Leibold M. A., Chase J. M. (2017). Metacommunity Ecology. Princeton University Press. doi: doi:10.2307/j.ctt1wf4d24
  24. Leibold M. A., Holyoak M., Mouquet N., Amarasekare P., Chase J. M., Hoopes M. F.. (2004). The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601 – 612. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x
  25. Leibold M. A., Rudolph F. J., Blanchet F. G., De Meester L., Gravel D., Hartig F.. (2022). The internal structure of metacommunities. Oikos 2022: 1. doi: doi:10.1111/oik.08618
  26. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  27. Magalhães A. L. B., Brito M. F. G., Sarrouh B. (2019). An inconvenient routine: Introduction, establishment and spread of new non-native fishes in the Paraíba do Sul River basin, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop. Biol. Conserv. 14, 329 – 338. doi: doi:10.3897/neotropical.14.e38058
  28. Menezes N. A., Weitzman S. H., Oyakawa O. T., Lima F. C. T., Castro R. M. C., Weitzman M. J. (2007). Peixes de água doce da Mata Atlântica. São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo.
  29. Moraes M. B. de, Ferreira, F. C., Souza U. P. (2021). Reproductive biology of Neotropical tetra fish Mimagoniates lateralis (Nichols, 1913) (Characiformes, Characidae), an endangered species of blackwater streams of southeastern Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 56, 234 – 237. doi: doi:10.1080/01650521.2020.1803716
  30. Moreira M. F., Peressin A., Lopes J. de M., Pompeu P. S. (2023). Fish assemblage and current status of the upper São Francisco River basin floodplain. Acta Limnol. Bras. 35: e26. doi: doi:10.1590/s2179-975x0823
  31. Pazin V. F. V., Magnusson W. E., Zuanon J., Mendonça F. P. (2006). Fish assemblages in temporary ponds adjacent to “terra-firme” streams in Central Amazonia. Freshw. Biol. 51, 1025 – 1037. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01552.x
  32. Reis R.E. (1997). Revision of the neotropical catfish genus Hoplosternum (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes: Callichthyidae), with the description of two new genera and three new species. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 7, 299 – 326.
  33. Selinger A., Duarte R. M., Delariva R. L., Souza U. P., Costa J. H. A. (2025). Trophic ecology of the vulnerable tetra Mimagoniates lateralis (Nichols, 1913) in a blackwater stream of the Atlantic Forest. Acta Limnol. Bras. 37: e21. doi: doi:10.1590/s2179-975x2525
  34. Silva R. G. A., Pérez-Mayorga M. A., Romero R. M. (2023). Coastal freshwater stream fish fauna from a threatened estuarine lagoon complex in northeastern Brazil. Environ. Biol. Fish. 106, 2141 – 2156. doi: doi:10.1007/s10641-023-01495-x
  35. Socolar J. B., Gilroy J. J., Kunin W. E., Edwards D. P. (2016). How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 67 – 80. doi: doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005
  36. Spencer M., Blaustein L., Schwartz S. S., Cohen J. E. (1999). Species richness and the proportion of predatory animal species in temporary freshwater pools: Relationships with habitat size and permanence. Ecol. Lett. 2, 157 – 166. doi: doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00062.x
  37. Taylor C. M. (1997). Fish species richness and incidence patterns in isolated and connected stream pools: Effects of pool volume and spatial position. Oecologia 110, 560 – 566. doi: doi:10.1007/s004420050196
  38. Tondato K. K., Fantin-cruz I., Pedrollo O. C., Súarez Y. R. (2013). Spatial distribution of fish assemblages along environmental gradients in the temporary ponds of Northern Pantanal, Brazil. J. Limnol. 72, 95 – 102. doi: doi:10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e8
  39. Volcan M., Lanés L. (2018). Brazilian killifishes risk extinction. Science 361: 340341. doi: doi:10.1126/science.aau5930
  40. Williams D. D. (2007). The Biology of Temporary Waters. Oxford University Press.

Citation

Costa, J. H. A. d., et al. (2026). Drivers of fish beta diversity vary by habitat and rainfall period in temporary freshwater habitats of the Atlantic Forest. Frontiers in Freshwater Science, Volume 4. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
4 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Costa, Zuanon, Selinger, Souza and Duarte.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: João Henrique Alliprandini da Costa

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0