Skip to content

Editorial

Frontiers in Horticulture ·

Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2026.1980079

Editorial: Light application in controlled environment horticulture

  • Oksana Lastochkina1*corresponding author
  • Stefano Marino2*corresponding author
  1. 1Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
  2. 2Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Controlled environment horticulture (CEH) systems, such as greenhouses and vertical farms, are transforming under climate change, urbanization, and the demands for resource efficiency and product quality (Pattison et al., 2018). The use of artificial light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for plant cultivation, pioneered by NASA (Bula et al., 1991), has since evolved into large-scale vertical farming (plant factory with artificial lighting, PFAL) in Japan (Kozai, 2018; 2020) and into precision light recipes for greenhouse crops (Marcelis et al., 2019; Lazzarin et al., 2021). The research focus has shifted from biomass maximization to metabolic regulation. LEDs are recognized not merely as a source of photosynthetic photons but as tools for modulating phenotype, secondary metabolites, and nutritional value. However, significant gaps remain in the development and commercial implementation of cost-effective lighting regimes and canopy-level light management, limiting improvements in crop yield and quality.

This special issue was initiated by our esteemed colleague, Dr. Sasan Aliniaeifard (1981–2025). After training at Wageningen University, he founded a pioneering research centre for controlled environment agriculture at Tehran University in Iran. His work on stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and photomorphogenesis under LEDs; spectral optimization for greenhouse crops (Ghorbanzadeh et al., 2021; Saeedi et al., 2023; Aliniaeifard et al., 2025; Azizi et al., 2025); and secondary metabolite manipulation (Eftekhari et al., 2023; Fallah et al., 2024) provided the basis for modern light recipes. We dedicate this issue to his memory.

Beyond single-plant studies, this issue offers a systems-based approach to modern light culture. The four studies presented here reveal how light recipes interact with alternative substrates, how light programs non-photosynthetic organisms (mushrooms), and their scaling within circular platforms like aquaponics. Collectively, they provide a framework for next-generation horticulture, linking fundamental regulatory mechanisms with sustainable, closed-loop ecosystems.

Light quality effects and light recipes

The study by Azad and Naznin contributes to our understanding of the effects of supplemental red (R) and far-red (FR) against a white (W) LED background on growth, phytochemicals, and antioxidant accumulation in indoor-grown lettuce and kale. The study revealed species-specific responses: in lettuce, R accelerated vegetative growth, increasing leaf area (+56.5%) and dry weight (+18.8%), while FR increased plant height and fresh weight and chlorophyll content by ~35%; in kale, the combined W+R+FR spectrum induced a dramatic (+572%) increase in anthocyanins, while W+R boosted phenolics by 10.7%. The authors conclude that the combined R+FR spectrum with W produced the most significant enhancement in biomass, pigments, and antioxidant activity for both species. This study highlights the power of spectrum optimization for producing antioxidant-rich functional foods. However, these benefits also present an important physiological challenge: R and FR supplementation also raised leaf nitrate levels by up to 69.1% in kale and by 53.6% in lettuce, underscoring the critical need for further research of light-regulated nitrogen metabolism.

Preharvest lighting for non-photosynthetic organisms

De Bonis et al. extended photobiology to mushrooms, showing that monochromatic LED lights applied during cultivation (not just post-harvest) alter morphology and programs quality of Pleurotus ostreatus (oyster mushroom). Blue (B) light increased cap size and glutamic acid (umami taste), while R light, especially when combined with a mixed specific substrate (wheat straw + cottonseed hulls), provides a pronounced biofortification effect, achieving the highest vitamin D2 biosynthesis (up to 123 μg kg-¹ dry weight). B and W light, as well as the R+B combination, maximized fruiting body yields (> 0.300 kg kg-¹), and B light enhanced essential amino acids (histidine and valine) linked to the umami flavor profile. These findings suggest a potentially new biofortification protocol for producing nutritionally dense mushrooms in protected conditions, as well as underscoring the critical role of substrates in optimizing mushroom production systems.

Monitoring and scaling sustainable production ecosystems

To manage the light scenarios described above, non-invasive phenotyping is essential. Balasus et al. propose reliable visible-spectrum reflectance metrics for monitoring cucumber leaf development. By establishing precise optical markers associated with leaf ontogeny, with particularly strong correlations on the abaxial leaf surface, this work lays the foundation for smart horticulture, in which light spectra can be dynamically adjusted based on real-time plant spectral reflectance. This approach could reduce the need for destructive sampling, enabling automated phenotyping and adaptive lighting management in commercial greenhouses or indoor farming systems.

Finally, Heo et al. present a critical comparative analysis of resource efficiency between a convectional hydroponic system (HS) and an aquaponic system (AS) with Silurus asotus (catfish) for the cultivation of five leafy vegetables and herbs (white leaf beets (Beta vulgaris var. cicla), hooker chives (Allium hookeri), basil (Ocimum basilicum), lemon balm (Melissa officinalis), and spearmint (Mentha spicata)) in an indoor greenhouse facility. Under identical light inputs, AS demonstrates a significant advantage over HS, increasing plant yields due to the natural organic nitrogen source from aquaculture. Leaf yield increased in AS compared to HS, ranging between 60-70% in the case of basil and lemon balms, and a remarkable 200% in the case of chives. The system maintained an optimal NO3–N concentration of 64 mg L-¹ demonstrating AS as a highly efficient, organic, and climate-smart alternative.

Conclusions

Collectively, the studies published in this research topic demonstrate that CEH is evolving toward an integrated framework in which LED light spectra, substrate composition, and biological symbiosis (plants-fish-mushroom) are managed as interconnected variables rather than isolated factors. This systems-level perspective can enable more precise control over crop phenotype and nutritional quality while improving overall resource efficiency. Key advancements include non-invasive optical monitoring for real-time plant development assessment, zero-waste aquaponic plant cultivation platforms, and species-specific plant or mushroom light recipes for functional food production. Looking forward, priority research directions should address dynamic preharvest lighting strategies to minimize nitrate accumulation, AI-driven integration of phenotyping data with adaptive lighting control, and comprehensive economic assessments of hybrid system scalability. In a broader context, these technologies hold promise not only for urban agriculture but also for autonomous life-support systems in space exploration. We dedicate this issue to the memory of Dr. Sasan Aliniaeifard, whose vision continues to guide this evolving field.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited and reviewed by: Francesco Di Gioia, The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), United States

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author SM declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Author contributions

OL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SM: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Frontiers for giving us an opportunity to edit a Research Topic on Light Application in Controlled Environment Horticulture. We are profoundly grateful to all contributing authors for their innovative submissions to this special issue, and to the expert reviewers, whose rigorous assessment ensured the highest scientific quality of the papers. Our gratitude is further extended to the Editorial Board of Frontiers in Horticulture for their support in bringing this collection available to the attention of global scientific community. We dedicate this work to the memory of Dr. Sasan Aliniaeifard, whose light continues to guide our scientific field.

References

  1. Aliniaeifard S., Azizi S., Zarbakhsh S., Esmaeili S., Baghalian K., Gruda N. S. (2025). Light in controlled environment agriculture. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 31, 615 – 621. doi: doi:10.1080/19315260.2025.2503228
  2. Azizi S., Aliniaeifard S., Zarbakhsh S., Esmaeili S., Baghalian K., Gruda N. S. (2025). Photobiology, photosynthesis, and plant responses under artificial lighting in controlled environment agriculture. Sci. Hortic. 349, 114248. doi: doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114248
  3. Bula R. J., Morrow R. C., Tibbitts T. W., Barta D. J., Ignatius R. W., Martin T. S. (1991). Light-emitting diodes as a radiation source for plants. HortScience 26, 203 – 205. doi: doi:10.21273/hortsci.26.2.203
  4. Eftekhari M., Javid M. G., Aliniaeifard S., Nicola S. (2023). Alteration of flower yield and phytochemical compounds of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) by application of different light qualities and growth regulators. Horticulturae 9, 169. doi: doi:10.3390/horticulturae9020169
  5. Fallah S., Aliniaeifard S., Zare Mehrjerdi M., Mirzaei S., Gruda N. S. (2024). Night interruption with red and far-red light optimizes the phytochemical composition, enhances photosynthetic efficiency, and increases biomass partitioning in Italian basil. Plants 13, 3145. doi: doi:10.3390/plants13223145
  6. Ghorbanzadeh P., Aliniaeifard S., Esmaeili M., Mashal M., Azadegan B., Seif M. (2021). Dependency of growth, water use efficiency, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal characteristics of lettuce plants to light intensity. J. Plant Growth Regul. 40, 2191 – 2207. doi: doi:10.1007/s00344-020-10269-z
  7. Kozai T. (2018). “ Smart plant factory,” in The Next Generation Indoor Vertical Farms, 2nd Edition (Springer, Singapore). doi: doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1065-2
  8. Kozai T., Hayashi E., Amagai Y. (2020). Plant factories with artificial lighting (PFALs) toward sustainable plant production. Acta Hortic. 1273, 251 – 260. doi: doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1273.34
  9. Lazzarin M., Meisenburg M., Meijer D., van Ieperen W., Marcelis L. F. M., Kappers I. F.. (2021). LEDs make it resilient: effects on plant growth and defense. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 496 – 508. doi: doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2020.11.013
  10. Marcelis L. F. M., Costa J. M., Heuvelink E. (2019). “ Achieving sustainable greenhouse production: present status, recent advances and future developments,” in Achieving Sustainable Greenhouse Cultivation, 1st Edition. Eds. Marcelis L., Heuvelink E. (Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, London), 380. doi: doi:10.1201/9780429266744
  11. Pattison P. M., Tsao J. Y., Brainard G. C. (2018). LEDs for photons, physiology and food. Nature 563, 493 – 500. doi: doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0706-x
  12. Saeedi S. A., Vahdati K., Sarikhani S., Daylami S. D., Davarzani M., Gruda N. S.. (2023). Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1292045. doi: doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1292045

Citation

Lastochkina, O. & Marino, S. (2026). Editorial: Light application in controlled environment horticulture. Frontiers in Horticulture, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
5 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Lastochkina and Marino.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Oksana Lastochkina; Stefano Marino

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0