Skip to content

Brief Research Report

Frontiers in Insect Science ·

Volume 6 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2026.1960516

Molecular identification of Comstockaspis perniciosa and its associated Aphytis parasitoid in apple orchards of Kazakhstan

  • Alibek Makhambetov1,2
  • Valeriya Kostyukova1
  • Gulnur Zholdasbek3
  • Zarina Dairbekova1
  • Bakyt Dulat1,4
  • Alexandr Pozharskiy1
  • Gulshariya Kairova3
  • Dilyara Gritsenko1,2,4*corresponding author
  1. 1Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  2. 2Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  3. 3Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  4. 4Research Center AgriBioTech, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock, 1881) is one of the most destructive quarantine pests of fruit crops, posing a serious threat to commercial orchards and natural populations of wild apple trees. Despite its widespread distribution, information on the molecular genetic characteristics of this species in Central Asia remains limited. The aim of this study was to characterize C. perniciosa collected from commercial orchards in southeastern Kazakhstan based on external morphological observations and molecular data, determine the phylogenetic position of the examined specimens using 28S rRNA gene sequences, and detect associated parasitoids using high-throughput sequencing technologies. During the growing season in 2025, surveys were conducted in ten commercial orchards, including sites located near natural populations of wild apple trees. Species-level identification of the collected specimens was confirmed by analysis of the 28S rRNA gene. All sequences clustered with reference C. perniciosa sequences, confirming species identity. Analysis of the high-throughput sequencing data additionally revealed sequences of parasitoids belonging to the genus Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in ten samples, indicating the presence of natural enemies associated with C. perniciosa. These findings expand current knowledge of the molecular characteristics of C. perniciosa in Central Asia and demonstrate the potential of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) technologies for the simultaneous detection of quarantine pests and their associated entomophagous natural enemies within phytosanitary monitoring programs.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock, 1881) (Hemiptera: Diaspididaeis one of the most destructive invasive phytophagous pests of temperate fruit crops (1). Its broad host range, high ecological plasticity, and considerable invasive potential contribute to the substantial economic losses caused by C. perniciosa (2, 3). Local adaptation to particular host plant genotypes has been suggested for some armored scale insects (4).

C. perniciosa is currently distributed on nearly all continents and infests more than 125 species of woody plants and shrubs, causing the greatest economic damage to apple, pear, peach, plum, and other fruit crops (5, 6). The insect damages bark, shoots, and fruits, resulting in reduced tree vigor, dieback of branches, decreased yield, and deterioration of fruit quality. An intensive infestations may cause young trees to die prematurely (1, 3). On apple fruits, a characteristic symptom of infestation is the formation of reddish halos around feeding sites, which significantly reduces their market value (7).

The spread of C. perniciosa is of particular concern in Kazakhstan because the country is the center of origin of Malus sieversii (Ledeb.) M.Roem., the primary wild progenitor of the cultivated apple, as well as the rare species Malus niedzwetzkyana Dieck (8). Populations of these wild apple species represent a unique global genetic resource of exceptional importance for biodiversity conservation and fruit crop breeding (9, 10). The close proximity of commercial, private, and abandoned orchards to natural apple forests creates a persistent risk of quarantine phytophagous pests spreading between agricultural and natural ecosystems. Abandoned orchards may serve as long-term reservoirs for C. perniciosa populations, maintaining infestation foci and facilitating further dispersal, including to wild Malus species (3, 11, 12). Therefore, monitoring and molecular identification of C. perniciosa populations are important not only for the phytosanitary management of fruit orchards but also for assessing potential risks to natural ecosystems.

In addition to studying the pest itself, investigation of its natural enemies is of considerable importance. Among the most effective parasitoids of C. perniciosa are species of the genus Aphytis Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), which are widely used in biological control programs targeting armored scale insects (13). Recent advances in sequencing technologies have greatly expanded opportunities to investigate such trophic interactions. In the present study, analysis of long-read sequences generated using Oxford Nanopore Technologies revealed not only sequences of Comstockaspis perniciosa but also sequences belonging to representatives of the genus Aphytis. This finding indicates the presence of parasitoid DNA in the analyzed material and demonstrates the potential of long-read sequencing for the simultaneous detection of phytophagous pests and their associated parasites or symbionts.

Despite the widespread occurrence of C. perniciosa, information on the molecular genetic characteristics of its populations in Central Asia remains limited, and data on its associated parasitoid complexes are scarce. The aim of the present study was to identify Comstockaspis perniciosa specimens collected from apple trees using 28S rRNA gene sequence analysis, record their external morphological characteristics during specimen examination, determine their phylogenetic position within the family Diaspididae, and identify sequences of parasitoids of the genus Aphytis detected during the analysis of Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing reads.

2. Materials and methods

Sample collection and preliminary morphological identification

Samples were collected during the 2025 growing season from commercial apple orchards in southeastern Kazakhstan. A total of ten sampling sites were surveyed (Table 1), including orchards located in close proximity to natural populations of wild apple trees. The sampling sites were selected based on the geographic distribution and availability of commercial apple orchards within the study area. Insects were collected using a random sampling approach. During the survey, 56 armored scale insect samples were collected.

Preliminary identification of Comstockaspis perniciosa was performed based on external morphological characteristics using published diagnostic descriptions and identification keys (14, 15). Adult females and first-instar crawlers were examined using a Leica Ivesta 3 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Species-level identification was subsequently confirmed by 28S rRNA gene sequence analysis.

Taxonomic identification using nanopore sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Monarch ® Spin gDNA Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

For the molecular characterization of Comstockaspis perniciosa, the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA gene (28S rDNA) was selected as the genetic marker. PCR amplification was performed using the primer pair 28S3a (AGTACGTGAAACCGTTCAGG) and 28Sb (TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTAC) (16). PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 25 µL containing 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA), 1× Taq buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 µM of each primer, and 20 ng of template DNA. Amplification was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by amplification cycles consisting of denaturation at 95 °C, annealing at 48 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min.

Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Rapid Barcoding Kit SQK-RBK114.96 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. High-throughput sequencing was performed on a PromethION P2 Solo platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). Raw signal data were basecalled in MinKNOW (v25.05.14) using the integrated Dorado basecaller (v7.9.8), and reads with mean Phred quality scores below 12 were removed using NanoFilt v2.8.0 (17). Quality-filtered reads were subsequently analyzed with NGSpeciesID v0.3.1 (18), which clusters similar nanopore reads and generates de novo consensus sequences for the identified clusters. The resulting consensus sequences were further polished using Medaka v2.0.1 to reduce the residual error rate characteristic of Oxford Nanopore sequencing.

All polished consensus sequences generated for each barcode were compared against the NCBI nucleotide database using the BLASTn algorithm. Taxonomic assignments were based on the most informative matches, taking into account query coverage, percentage sequence identity, and alignment significance.

Separate reference databases of 28S rRNA gene sequences were compiled for the families Diaspididae and Aphelinidae using publicly available GenBank records. Quality-filtered reads from barcodes containing a consensus sequence assigned to Aphelinidae were first mapped against the Diaspididae 28S rRNA reference database using minimap2 (19) in Oxford Nanopore read mode.

Reads that did not map to the Diaspididae reference database were subsequently mapped against the Aphelinidae 28S rRNA reference database. Reads successfully aligned to the latter were classified as Aphelinidae-associated, whereas reads that failed to align to either family-specific reference database were classified as unassigned. Alignment files were processed using SAMtools v1.23.1 (20), after which the numbers of reads assigned to Diaspididae, Aphelinidae, and the unassigned fraction were calculated for each barcode. The relative abundance of each read category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of reads. Data visualization was performed in Python v3.14.3 using the pandas v3.0.2 (20), and Matplotlib v3.10.8 (21) libraries, generating 100% normalized horizontal stacked bar charts.

For phylogenetic analysis, reference sequences were retrieved from the public NCBI database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the MAFFT algorithm (22) implemented in UGENE v50.0 0 (23). Phylogenetic relationships were inferred in MEGA 11 (24) using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates, and the resulting phylogenetic tree was further edited and visualized in FigTree v1.4.4.

3. Results

During the field survey of commercial apple orchards in southeastern Kazakhstan, ten sampling sites were examined (Figure 1), several of which were located in close proximity to natural populations of wild fruit trees. A total of 56 armored scale insect samples were collected and subsequently used for morphological and molecular analyses.

During the survey of apple orchards, Comstockaspis perniciosa was found on the bark of shoots and on the surface of apple fruits, where it formed colonies of varying densities. Under heavy infestations, the scale covers were closely aggregated, in some cases forming continuous colonies (Figure 2A). Infested fruits exhibited characteristic reddish-purple halos surrounding the feeding sites, a typical symptom of C. perniciosa damage (Figures 2B, C). The scale cover of the adult female was circular, slightly convex, greyish-brown in color, with well-defined centrally located yellow exuviae (Figures 2E, F). Removal of the scale cover revealed the soft body of the adult female, which was bright yellow and characteristically rounded in shape (Figure 2H). In addition to adult females, first-instar crawlers were observed. These exhibited an oblate body shape, bright yellow coloration, and lacked a protective scale cover (Figure 2G). The presence of the dispersal stage has indicated active population development during the survey period.

Taxonomic identification was subsequently confirmed by analysis of the nuclear 28S rRNA gene sequences. Analysis of the 28S rRNA gene sequences revealed that, in addition to consensus sequences of Comstockaspis perniciosa, a subset of the analyzed samples also contained sequences assigned to the family Aphelinidae. To clarify their taxonomic affiliation, reads were sequentially mapped against the reference databases of the families Diaspididae and Aphelinidae, after which the relative proportion of reads assigned to each family was determined.

Sequences belonging to the genus Aphytis were detected in ten C. perniciosa samples (Figure 3C) collected from the settlements of Bayseit and Bahar (sampling sites 1–8 in Figure 1). In all positive samples, the number of Aphytis reads was substantially lower than the number of C. perniciosa reads. This is most likely explained by the fact that DNA was extracted from C. perniciosa individuals, resulting in the majority of the recovered DNA originating from the host. In addition, parasitoids may have been present in the analyzed material only as eggs, larvae, pupae, or small tissue fragments beneath the scale cover, resulting in substantially lower biomass and, consequently, fewer sequencing reads than those derived from the scale insect.

Phylogenetic analysis of the 28S rRNA gene sequences of C. perniciosa showed that all sequences generated in the present study clustered within a single well-supported clade together with reference C. perniciosa sequences retrieved from the NCBI database (Figure 3A). Sequences obtained from different localities in the Almaty Region exhibited a high degree of similarity and showed no evident geographic differentiation. These results confirm that all analyzed specimens belong to C. perniciosa. It should be noted that the analyzed region of the 28S rRNA gene is a highly conserved molecular marker widely used for taxonomic identification. Therefore, the absence of pronounced intraspecific variation is expected and indicates that this marker is not suitable for assessing population structure or inferring the origin of the studied populations.

A separate phylogenetic analysis was performed for the sequences identified as belonging to the genus Aphytis (Figure 3B). All sequences generated in the present study clustered within the Aphytis clade together with reference sequences, confirming their assignment to this genus. It should be noted that the reference sequences forming the same clade as those obtained in the present study are annotated in GenBank as Aphytis sp., without species-level identification. Consequently, more precise taxonomic identification of the detected parasitoids is not possible based on the currently available data. The 28S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PZ785694–PZ785749 (C. perniciosa) and PZ780096–PZ780105 (Aphytis sp.).

4. Discussion

Over the past two decades, molecular methods have become one of the principal tools for the study of the family Diaspididae. Their widespread adoption has been driven by the limitations of traditional morphological diagnostics, which rely primarily on the characteristics of adult females, whereas males, immature developmental stages, and damaged specimens often lack sufficient diagnostic features for reliable identification (14, 16, 25). Additional challenges arise from the high degree of morphological conservatism and the presence of cryptic species (26). Consequently, molecular approaches have become an integral component of modern armored scale insect diagnostics.

The foundation of modern molecular systematics of Diaspididae was established by Andersen et al. (27), who reconstructed the phylogeny of the family using four molecular loci. Their study demonstrated the high utility of the 28S rRNA gene for resolving evolutionary relationships among armored scale insects. Subsequently, Schneider et al. (28) showed that many traditionally recognized genera, including Diaspidiotus, are not monophyletic, highlighting the limitations of classifications based solely on morphological characters. The results obtained in the present study are consistent with these findings: sequences from all C. perniciosa specimens formed a single clade together with reference sequences, confirming the suitability of the 28S rRNA marker for reliable taxonomic identification of armored scale insects. At the same time, the absence of intraspecific differentiation was expected, as the analyzed region is highly conserved and is not intended for population-level analyses.

Despite the worldwide distribution of C. perniciosa, molecular data for this species remain limited, and Central Asia is scarcely represented in international genetic databases. The sequences generated in the present study expand the known geographic representation of the species and may serve as a valuable resource for future studies of its distribution and origin.

The practical significance of this study is underscored by the fact that C. perniciosa is a quarantine pest included on the EPPO A2 List (29). The species was detected in commercial orchards located close to natural populations of Malus sieversii, the wild progenitor of the cultivated apple and an important source of genetic diversity for breeding programs (10, 30). The detection of active infestation foci and first-instar crawlers, which represent the only actively dispersing stage of the life cycle (3, 7, 25), indicates a potential risk of the pest spreading from cultivated orchards into natural ecosystems and emphasizes the need for phytosanitary monitoring of transition zones between agricultural and natural habitats.

Another important outcome of this study was the detection of sequences belonging to the genus Aphytis during the analysis of DNA extracted from scale insects. Members of this genus are specialized ectoparasitoids of Diaspididae and are widely used in biological control programs targeting C. perniciosa (31). Although the detection of parasitoids was not an objective of the study, the application of high-throughput sequencing enabled the simultaneous identification of both the phytophagous pest and its associated natural enemy. All detected sequences clustered confidently within the genus Aphytis; however, species-level identification was not possible because of the conserved nature of the 28S rRNA marker and the limited availability of reference sequences. These findings demonstrate the potential of NGS technologies for the simultaneous detection of quarantine pests and their natural enemies within phytosanitary monitoring programs.

5. Conclusions

As a result of the present study, populations of Comstockaspis perniciosa collected from commercial orchards in southeastern Kazakhstan were characterized based on external morphological observations and molecular data. Species-level identification was confirmed by 28S rRNA gene sequence analysis, and phylogenetic reconstruction demonstrated that all obtained sequences clustered with reference C. perniciosa sequences available in international databases. An important finding of this study was the detection of sequences belonging to the genus Aphytis in ten samples of C. perniciosa. Although species-level identification of the parasitoids was not possible due to the conserved nature of the analyzed 28S rRNA region and the limited availability of reference sequences, the results confirm the presence of representatives of this genus in the studied pest populations. The practical significance of these findings lies in the fact that the surveyed orchards were located in close proximity to natural populations of the wild apple species Malus sieversii and M. niedzwetzkyana, which are of exceptional conservation and genetic importance. The presence of established populations of this quarantine pest in such areas indicates a potential risk of its spread from cultivated orchards into natural ecosystems, highlighting the need for regular field monitoring of transition zones between agricultural and natural habitats and for the integration of molecular methods into early detection and quarantine pest surveillance programs.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the framework of a targeted funding program BR22887230.

Data availability

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PZ785694–PZ785749 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PZ780096–PZ780105.

Ethics approval

The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.

Author contributions

AM: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis. VK: Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Writing – original draft. GZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Visualization. ZD: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. BD: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. AP: Writing – original draft, Visualization. GK: Writing – original draft, Project administration. DG: Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation.

References

  1. 1 Buzzetti K, Chorbadjian RA, Nauen R. Resistance management for San Jose scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). J Econ Entomol. (2015) 108: 2743–52. doi: doi:10.1093/jee/tov236
  2. 2 Normark BB, Morse GE, Krewinski A, Okusu A. Armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) of San Lorenzo National Park, Panama, with descriptions of two new species. Ann Entomol Soc Am. (2014) 107: 37 – 49. doi: doi:10.1603/AN13110
  3. 3 Golan K, Kot I, Kmieć K, Górska-Drabik E. Approaches to integrated pest management in orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) case study. Agriculture. (2023) 13: 131. doi: doi:10.3390/agriculture13010131
  4. 4 Glynn C, Herms DA. Local adaptation in pine needle scale (Chionaspis pinifoliae): Natal and novel host quality as tests for specialization within and among red and Scots pine. Environ Entomol. (2004) 33: 748–55. doi: doi:10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.748
  5. 5 García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. ScaleNet: a literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database (Oxford). (2016) 2016: bav118. doi: doi:10.1093/database/bav118
  6. 6 Martins DDS, Wolff VRDS, Culik MP, Santos BCD, Fornazier MJ, Ventura JA. Diversity, distribution and host plants of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Espírito Santo, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. (2022) 22: e20211248. doi: doi:10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2021-1248
  7. 7 EPPO. Comstockaspis Perniciosa (2026). Available online at: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/QUADPE/datasheet (Accessed September 22, 2026).
  8. 8 Wang N, Jiang S, Zhang Z, Fang H, Xu H, Wang Y. Malus sieversii: the origin, flavonoid synthesis mechanism, and breeding of red-skinned and red-fleshed apples. Hortic Res. (2018) 5: 70. doi: doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0084-4
  9. 9 Duan N, Bai Y, Sun H, Wang N, Ma Y, Li M. Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement. Nat Commun. (2017) 8: 249. doi: doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7
  10. 10 Tegtmeier R, Švara A, Gritsenko D, Khan A. Malus sieversii: a historical, genetic, and conservational perspective of the primary progenitor species of domesticated apples. Hortic Res. (2025) 12: uhae244. doi: doi:10.1093/hr/uhae244
  11. 11 Khusnitdinova M, Kostyukova V, Nizamdinova G, Pozharskiy A, Kydyrbayev Y, Gritsenko D. Cross-ecosystem transmission of pathogens from crops to natural vegetation. Forests. (2026) 17: 76. doi: doi:10.3390/f17010076
  12. 12 Alston D, Murray M, Reding M. San Jose Scale (2011). USU. Available online at: https://extension.usu.edu/planthealth/research/san-jose-scale (Accessed July 22, 2026).
  13. 13 Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM. Consumer-Resource Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2003).
  14. 14 Schneider SA, Fizdale MA, Normark BB. An online interactive identification key to common pest species of Aspidiotini (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha, Diaspididae), version 1.0. ZooKeys. (2019) 867: 87 – 96. doi: doi:10.3897/zookeys.867.34937
  15. 15 Diaspididae of the World 2.0: Welcome. Available online at: https://diaspididae.linnaeus.naturalis.nl/linnaeus_ng/app/views/introduction/topic.php?id=3377&epi=155 (Accessed August 6, 2026).
  16. 16 Campbell AM, Lawrence AJ, Hudspath CB, Gruwell ME. Molecular identification of Diaspididae and elucidation of non-native species using the genes 28s and 16s. Insects. (2014) 5: 528–38. doi: doi:10.3390/insects5030528
  17. 17 De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. (2018) 34: 2666–9. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149
  18. 18 Sahlin K, Lim MCW, Prost S. NGSpeciesID: DNA barcode and amplicon consensus generation from long-read sequencing data. Ecol Evol. (2021) 11: 1392–8. doi: doi:10.1002/ece3.7146
  19. 19 Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. (2018) 34: 3094–100. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
  20. 20 Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience. (2021) 10: giab008. doi: doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab008
  21. 21 Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Computing Sci Eng. (2007) 9: 90–7. doi: doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
  22. 22 Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. (2002) 30: 3059–66. doi: doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436
  23. 23 Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M the UGENE team. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics. (2012) 28: 1166–7. doi: doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091
  24. 24 Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. (2021) 38: 3022–7. doi: doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120
  25. 25 Miller DR, Davidson JA. Armored Scale Insect Pests of Trees and Shrubs (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (2005).
  26. 26 Gwiazdowski RA, Vea IM, Andersen JC, Normark BB. Discovery of cryptic species among North American pine-feeding Chionaspis scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Biol J Linn Soc. (2011) 104: 47 – 62. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01716.x
  27. 27 Andersen JC, Wu J, Gruwell ME, Gwiazdowski R, Santana SE, Feliciano NM. A phylogenetic analysis of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), based upon nuclear, mitochondrial, and endosymbiont gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2010) 57: 992 – 1003. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.002
  28. 28 Schneider SA, Okusu A, Normark BB. Molecular phylogenetics of Aspidiotini armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) reveals rampant paraphyly, curious species radiations, and multiple origins of association with Melissotarsus ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. (2018) 129: 291 – 303. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.09.003
  29. 29 EPPO A2 List. Available online at: https://www.eppo.int/ACTIVITIES/plant_quarantine/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.eppo.int%2FACTIVITIES%2Fplant_quarantine%2FA2_list (Accessed August 4, 2026).
  30. 30 Cornille A, Gladieux P, Smulders MJM, Roldán-Ruiz I, Laurens F, Le Cam B. New insight into the history of domesticated apple: secondary contribution of the European wild apple to the genome of cultivated varieties. PloS Genet. (2012) 8: e1002703. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002703
  31. 31 Shields VDC. Biological Control of Pest and Vector Insects. London: BoD – Books on Demand (2017).

Citation

Makhambetov, A., et al. (2026). Molecular identification of Comstockaspis perniciosa and its associated Aphytis parasitoid in apple orchards of Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Insect Science, Volume 6. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
6 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Makhambetov, Kostyukova, Zholdasbek, Dairbekova, Dulat, Pozharskiy, Kairova and Gritsenko.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Dilyara Gritsenko

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0