Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Tropical Diseases ·

Volume 7 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2026.1857331

Burden of snakebite and the knowledge of health professionals toward envenomation management in Hamer wereda, South Omo, Ethiopia

  • Jemal Mohammed1*corresponding author
  • Demise Mulugeta1
  • Anberebir Alemu1
  • Abebe M. Aga1
  • Fanos Tadesse Woldemariyam1
  • Yeweynshet Tesera1
  • Abate Waldetensai2
  • Henok Ferede1
  • Dejene Getachew1
  • Ayele Bizuneh1
  • Dereje Nigussie1
  1. 1Vaccine, Diagnostics and Medical device Research & Development Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  2. 2Malaria and Neglected Tropical Disease Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease that poses a public health concern for low-income rural population in many tropical and subtropical countries. In the Hamer wereda of Ethiopia, snakebite envenomation creates a significant public health challenge. This is largely attributable to community’s pastoralist lifestyle, which necessitates frequent mobility across rural landscapes and increases exposure to snake habitats. To quantify burden of snakebite and knowledge of health professionals’ in snakebite envenomation management, and provide contextual evidence to inform preventive strategies in Hamer wereda, Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study design was employed to collect data through structured interviews with health professionals and a review of snakebite case records in health facilities. The majority of health professionals 73/75 (97.3%) had never experienced any kind of formal training on snakebite management. Of the health professionals surveyed, 48.0% reported their health facilities treated an estimated 5 to 20 snakebite cases annually. A higher proportion of snakebite cases (41.3%) occurred during the rainy season. The most suspected occupations of snakebite victims were farmers (52.0%) and herders (41.3%), who were between the ages of 15 and 60 years (74.7%). The common clinical manifestations of snakebites are neurotoxicity (30.7%), hemotoxicity (30.7%), and local tissue damage (38.7%). The lack of antivenom (65.3%) and delays in patient presentation (61.3%) were identified as the most significant challenges to snakebite management. There were high mortality rates from snakebites, with 66.7% of health facilities reporting deaths due to snakebites over a five-year period, primarily related to delays in seeking medical care (44.0%) and prior visits to traditional healers (32.0%). The total snakebite burden for the period of five years was 551.22 DALYs. While antivenom was available in the facilities, most of it was sourced from donations (74.7%) and was insufficient, with shortages reported in 81.7% of health facilities. Approximately 61.3% of all professionals reported that their communities were uninformed about snakebites; with 69.3% of health facilities did not provide snakebite education. Snakebite is an occupational risk factor associated with high mortality that is driven by systemic barriers, including antivenom shortages, substantial treatment delays, and critically low levels of knowledge regarding snakebite management and community awareness.

Keywords

Introduction

Snakebites are neglected tropical diseases that impose a significant public health burden on poor rural communities in many tropical and subtropical countries. Although the world is home to over 3,000 snake species, the World Health Organization (WHO) classifies around 250 as medically significant due to the harmful effects of their venom. These medically important venomous snakes are present in 160 countries. Globally, snakebites affect an estimated 5.4 million people annually, resulting in 1.8 to 2.7 million cases of envenomation. Of these, approximately 81,000 to 138,000 deaths occur each year, with the vast majority reported in developing countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America (1, 2). Owing to this substantial burden and historical neglect, the WHO has classified snakebite as a high-priority neglected tropical disease and set a target to halve global morbidity and mortality by 2030. The poorer a country, the more common snakebite poisoning tends to be (3, 4). In low and middle income countries, snakebites disproportionately harm women, children, and farmers living in poor rural communities (5).

Africa has over 130 venomous snake species, responsible for 435,000 to 580,000 human envenomations and around 30,000 deaths annually. Nevertheless, these figures are likely underreported as many victims never visit health facilities, and reliable epidemiological data remain scarce across the continent (6). In Ethiopia, diverse geographic, climatic, and ecological conditions create a favorable environment for numerous medically important snake species. The country is home to an estimated 10–12 venomous species, including cobras, vipers, and puff adders, widely distributed across lowland and savanna regions (7). Human activities such as resettlement, military campaigns, sheep herding, firewood collection, sugarcane cutting, honey collection, and timber work frequently disturb snake habitats and precipitate snakebite incidents. However, epidemiological data on snakebite incidence, mortality, and socioeconomic impact remain severely limited. The true burden of snakebite disease in Ethiopia lacks resolution and completeness, largely due to underreporting, as many victims seek traditional treatments either inadequate or inaccessible medical care (8, 9).

Hamer wereda, located in the South Omo Zone of the South Ethiopia Regional State, represents a particularly high-risk and understudied setting for snakebite envenomation. The wereda is characterized by arid and semi-arid lowland topography, hot climatic conditions, and sparse vegetation that support a high density of venomous snakes. The local economy is predominantly agro-pastoral, with most of the population engaged in cattle herding, goat rearing, and subsistence farming. These livelihood activities, combined with traditional housing structures that offer limited protection against snake entry, place community members at elevated risk of bites. Furthermore, Hamer wereda is geographically remote, with limited road infrastructure and long distances to health facilities. Unreliable reports and routine facility records suggest substantial underreporting, inconsistent case documentation, and potential gaps in health professionals’ readiness to manage snakebites is enhanced by adequate knowledge of envenomation and treatment protocol (10).

The seasonal patterns, case fatality rates, and proportion of victims who do not seek care remain unknown. Similarly, the readiness of health facilities specifically, health professionals’ capability to recognize snake species, administer antivenom appropriately, manage complications, and monitor patients has never been assessed. Snakebites can cause severe organ system damage, including paralysis, tissue necrosis, muscle breakdown, kidney failure, and hypovolemic shock, necessitating prompt medical emergencies and precise diagnosis (11, 12). Antivenom neutralizes only accessible venom components; it cannot repair damaged organs or tissues. Once some toxins are sequestered inside cells, they become inaccessible to antivenom immunoglobulins, making immediate treatment crucial (13, 14). A snakebite envenomation harms not only the bitten individual but also the entire family’s finances, emotions, and future life. In many cases, snakebites make poor people even poorer, forcing them to pay expensive treatment fees and borrow money to survive (15, 16). A lack of community awareness about the severity of snakebite envenomation, along with insufficient training for health professionals to improve their knowledge, attitudes, and practices remains a cause of disease related loss (17, 18).

This study provides the first baseline data on snakebite burden in Hamer wereda, by generating primary epidemiological evidence on snakebite frequency and seasonal distribution, producing actionable findings to inform targeted training. Additionally, this study contribute to improve case management for health professionals; and supporting evidence based resource allocation, antivenom supply planning, and priority setting for local health authorities and policy makers. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the facility based burden of snakebite disease in this mobile population and the readiness of health professionals to manage snakebite cases in Hamer wereda, South Omo Zone, South Ethiopia Regional State.

Methodology

Study design and setting

A facility-based cross-sectional study design was employed to assess the relevant study variables over a data collection period from April 12, 2025, to August 15, 2025. The study was conducted in Hamer wereda, which is located in the South Omo Zone of the South Ethiopia Regional State. The setting covered all public health facilities within the wereda, including Dimaka, Erbore, Kara Dusa, Shanqo, and Turmi health centers (Figure 1).

Map of Hamer wereda highlighting the study health facilities.
Figure 1. Map of Hamer wereda highlighting the study health facilities.

Study population and sample size

The study population comprised all health professionals working in the public health facilities of Hamer wereda. Since the total number of target population in these facilities was manageable and feasible for a complete enumeration no sample size was calculated, and a census approach employed. Accordingly, all health professionals who met the inclusion criteria were recruited into the study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Health professionals were eligible for inclusion in the study if they had been working in public health facilities within Hamer wereda for at least six months prior to data collection. Professionals were excluded from the study if they were on annual leave, sick leave, or any other form of authorized absence during the data collection period. Additionally, those who did not provide voluntary informed consent to participate were excluded. Any medical record of a snakebite case that contained incomplete information or recorded before five years were excluded at the time of data extraction. A total of 78 health professionals were eligible for the study, of whom 75 enrolled and participated, yielding a 96.1%participation rate.

Data collection procedure

Structured questionnaires were developed based on the concept of neglected tropical diseases and a review of the literature on snakebite management (19–22). The questionnaires were prepared in English and subsequently translated into local languages to ensure participants had a comprehensive understanding of the content. Face to face interview were conducted by trained data collectors who had experience in qualitative research methods. Interviews were scheduled at a convenient time and location for each participant, typically at their workplace. To ensure privacy and confidentiality, no external individuals were present during the interviews. Field notes were taken during and after each interview to capture observations and reflections of the respondents (23, 24). All snakebite cases recorded in outpatient and inpatient medical registers between September 2021 and July 2025 representing a five-year period were reviewed across all health facilities in the wereda. For each identified snakebite case, data were extracted on sex, age, date of visit, number of days spent in the health facility, and treatment outcome (25). Data on snakebite cases and deaths were extracted from the study sites health facilities. The population at risk was estimated using annual projections from the Ethiopian Statistical Service (ESA). The burden of snakebite was quantified using standard metrics: Incidence rate, Case fatality rate, Years of Life Lost (YLL), Years Lived with Disability (YLD), and Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) (26, 27).

Data analysis

Trained data clerks entered the data into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subsequently exported it to SPSS version 27 for data cleaning, validation, and statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, and percentages) were computed to summarize the characteristics of health professionals and frequency documented snakebite case.

Variables: The dependent variables were health professionals’ readiness to manage snakebite and the annual snakebite case reported. The independent variables included sociodemographic characteristics including age, sex, professional category, years of experience, prior training on snakebite management and availability of antivenom in health facilities.

Analytical steps: First, we computed frequencies and proportions for snakebite burden indicators including seasonal distribution, snakebite related mortality and complications from retrospective facilities records. Next, we assessed health professionals’ readiness by calculating proportion of correct responses on antivenom administration, and appropriate first aid practices. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Data quality control

Quality control measures were implemented to ensure data accuracy and reliability. The questionnaire was pretested on five health professionals working in non-study health facilities to assess its clarity, comprehension, relevance, sensitivity, flow, length, and completion time, with subsequent refinements made accordingly. Data collectors and supervisors received standardized training, and daily supervision was provided throughout the fieldwork period. Completed questionnaires were checked daily for completeness and consistency by field supervisors. Regular team meetings were conducted to review progress, discuss inconsistencies, and ensure uniform application of inclusion criteria and data collection procedures. To minimize data entry errors, two independent operators performed double data entry. Additionally, a random sample of 10% of records was rechecked against the original questionnaires to verify entry accuracy.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants

Young adults made up the majority of participants (Table 1), with the largest age group being 21--27 years (50.7%). Males constituted the majority of the study participants (57.3%), and nurses accounted for the largest professional cohort (37.3%), followed by health officers (21.3%). The smallest study participants were anesthetists (1.3%) and medical doctors (4.0%). With only 5.3% reporting more than ten years of work experience and 69.3% having fewer than five, the participants were primarily early-career professionals. Critically, the majority (97.3%) had never received any official snakebite management training.

Table 1. Background information of the study participants (n=75).

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
Age21-273850.7
28-342736.0
351013.3
SexMale4357.3
Female3242.7
ProfessionNurse2837.3
Pharmacy1013.3
Health officer1621.3
Medical doctor34.0
Mid wife912.0
Medical laboratory810.6
Anesthesia11.3
Experience (Years)<55269.3
6-101925.3
>1045.3
Formal trainingYes22.7
No7397.3

Burden of snakebites, clinical profiles of cases and complications

As detailed in Table 2, snakebites represent a regular clinical burden, with 48.0% of health professionals managing 5–20 cases annually. Seasonal variation was noted, with the highest incidence reported during the rainy season (40.8%). The demographic profile of typical victims identified productive aged adults (15–60 years) as the most affected group, accounting for 74.7% of the cases. This corresponds with occupational data, which identified farmers (51.3%) and herders (40.8%) as the highest-risk groups, underscoring that snakebites in this region function predominantly as occupational threats for rural, agricultural workers. The clinical manifestations of cases were distributed almost evenly among neurotoxic (30.3%), hemotoxic (30.3%), and local tissue damaging (38.2%) envenomation.

Table 2. Snakebite management and case profiles reported by the study participants (n=75).

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage (%)
How frequently do you encounter snakebite cases in your health facility?Rarely (<5 per year)1824.0
Occasionally (5–20 per year)3648.0
Frequently (>20 per year)2128.0
What is the most common typeof snakebite case you manage?Neurotoxic2330.7
Hemotoxic2330.7
Local tissue damage2938.7
Unknown1824.0
What age group is most affected by snakebites in your area?Children (<15 years)1520.0
Adults (15–60 years)5674.7
Elders (>60 years)45.3
Most common season ofsnakebiteRainy season3141.3
Dry seasons2229.3
All year round2229.3
Most affected occupationFarmer3952.0
Herders3141.3
Laborers45.3
Others11.3
What challenges do you facewhen managing snakebite cases?Lack of antivenom4965.3
Delayed presentation4661.3
Inadequate knowledge4560.0
Poor referral systems2938.7
Death due to snakebite in yourfacility in the last five yearsYes5066.7
No2533.3
Possible reasons for death inhealth facilityProlonged visits to traditional healers2432.0
distance and lack of transport access3344.0
Inadequate artificial ventilation1925.3
Develop complication before arrival1520.0
No antivenom at that time1722.7
Death occurred in each facilitiesfor the last five years<51638.1
>52661.9
What type of complications were seen*Dry cough, fever, nausea, vomiting2432.0
Urticarial & pruritus of trunk and face22.7
Shaking chills, fever, vasodilatation2837.3
Arthralgia, myalgia, lymphadenopathy1925.3
Disability79.3

* Multiple responses and percentages are not mutually exclusive.

A lack of antivenom (65.3%) and delayed medical presentation (61.3%) were the greatest reported challenges. High mortality (66.7%) had reported in health facilities from snakebites in the last five years. Most of the reasons for death were distance and lack of transportation (44%) and prolonged visits to traditional healers (32%). Frequently reported complications were systemic reactions such as shaking chills, fever, and vasodilation (37.3%). However, disability was reported in 9.3% of the patients.

The majority of snakebite victims recorded at the study health facilities (58.9%) were males (Table 3). A significant association was found between sex and age distribution (p<0.001), with the largest proportion of cases (48.2%) reported in individuals over 32 years. The most frequently affected age group was the 10–19 years age group, accounting for 33.9% of all cases, followed by the 20–29 years age group (29.5%). Collectively, these two groups represented nearly 63.4% of the total snakebite cases. The overall health outcomes following snakebites were severe. Nine deaths (8.0%) and two permanent disability cases (1.8%) were recorded. A statistically significant association was observed between sex and health status (p<0.001). While the number of deaths was male (n=4) and female (n=5), both recorded cases of disability occurred in female patients. The vast majority of male patients (93.9%) recovered to a normal status, whereas 84.8% of female patients did. Delays in seeking health professionals an essential finding. Over half of the victims (51.8%) presented to a health facility 48 hours or more after the snakebite, with a significant association with sex (p<0.001). Males constituted the majority (62.1%) of those in this delayed presentation group. Conversely, the length of stay in the health facility after admission was also significantly associated with sex (p<0.001), with most patients (54.5%) staying between 7 and 10 hours. A greater proportion of female patients (28.3%) presented within the critical first 6 hours than did male patients (19.7%).

Table 3. Snakebite related mortality and complications in the last five years (n=112).

VariablesCategoriesSexp value
MaleFemaleTotal (%)
Age (years)<1514822 (19.6)<0.001
26-31221436 (32.1)
>32302454 (48.2)
Health statusDeath459 (8.0)<0.001
Disable022 (1.8)
Normal6239101 (90.2)
Delay time to visithealth care (Hours)≤24272451 (45.5)<0.001
24-48303 (2.7)
≥48362258 (51.8)
Stay in health facilityafter exposure (Hours)≤6131326 (23.2)<0.001
7-10372461 (54.5)
≥1116925 (22.3)

Over the five-year period, a total of 112 snakebite cases were recorded in Hamer Wereda, with nine deaths reported (Table 4). The average annual incidence rate was 26.15 per 100,000 population. The incidence fluctuated during the study period, peaking in 2024 at 36.42 per 100,000 and reaching its lowest point in 2025 at 20.76 per 100,000. The average case fatality rate was 7.85% (9 deaths per 112 cases), with annual rates varying significantly from a high of 10.53% in 2022 to a low of 4.76% in 2021. The total disease burden for the period was 551.22 DALYs. YLL accounted for the vast majority of this burden (547.38 DALYs), while YLD contributed only 3.84 DALYs, reflecting a high fatality to morbidity ratio from the envenoming.

Table 4. Burden of Snakebite in Hamer Wereda (2021–2025).

YearsCasesIRDeath(n)CFR (%)YLLYDLDALY
20212126.1514.7660.820.7261.54
20221923.19210.53121.640.65122.29
20232327.5328.70121.640.79122.43
20243136.4239.68182.461.06183.52
20251820.7615.5660.820.6261.44
Total112129.1498.04547.383.84551.22

IR, Incidence rate (per 100,000); CFR, Case fatality rate; YLL, Years of Life Lost; YLD, Years Lived with Disability; DALY, Disability-Adjusted Life Year; Disability Weight: 0.163.

Population (Hamer wereda) for each year’s taken from Ethiopian Central Statistical service (ESA). The Life Expectancy at age of death = 60.82 years (based on worldometer data for Ethiopia, the mean age of snakebite victim 7.33 years with remaining life expectancy of 60.82 years).

Challenges in snakebite management

The majority of health professionals (81.7%) reported having antivenom in their facilities (Table 5). The primary source of this antivenom was the donor (74.7%), with only a limited number of facilities (25.3%) reporting that it was obtained from the Ethiopian pharmaceutical supply service (EPSS). Furthermore, all health facilities reported using a polyvalent antivenom type. However, a significant majority of facilities (81.7%) reported that they did not receive a sufficient quantity of antivenom to meet their requests. Regarding the cost to the patient, the price for a full dose of antivenom varied, with the most common price range being 2,501-3,500 birr. Most facilities (89.3%) reported not encountering any antivenom related complications during patient treatment. The financial burden on patients is considerable, with nearly 70% of facilities reporting a full dose cost exceeding 2,500 birr and over 20% reporting costs above 3,500. This high cost, coupled with potential supply insufficiency, can create terrible expenditures for affected families and act as a barrier to accessing life-saving treatment.

Table 5. Antivenom availability, sourcing and types (N = 75).

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
Is there antivenom in your health facilityYes6281.7
No1317.3
Where did you get antivenom toEPSS1925.3
Donors5674.7
What type of antivenom did youuse to treat patientsMonovalent0.00.0
Polyvalent75100
Did you get sufficient antivenomas requestedYes1317.3
No6281.7
Did you face any antivenomrelated complicationYes810.7
No6789.3
What is the cost of full dose ofantivenom?1500-25002533.3
2501-35003445.3
3501+1621.3

Knowledge of snakebite management and practices

The knowledge of snakebite envenomation signs and antivenom administration criteria for health professionals reveals critical gaps (Table 6). The identification of local signs such as swelling (58.7%) and painful lymph nodes (46.7%) was relatively common. Recognition of systemic and critical laboratory signs was very low. Local swelling (58.7%) in the form of snakebite envenomation was the most common criterion to allow antivenom for victims. Wound management and secondary infection were more consistent, with a majority reporting immediate first aid (72.0%) and antibiotic prophylaxis (64.0%). However, adherence to tetanus prevention (42.7%) was inadequate, suggesting a need to reinforce comprehensive wound care protocols.

Table 6. Health professionals knowledge and practices regarding the clinical decisions of snakebite cases (n=75).

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
What is the screening criteria to recommend the suspected patients admitted your health facility to start antivenom therapyLocal pain at the site of the bite3040.0
Local swelling4458.7
Painful enlargement of lymph nodes3546.7
Spontaneous systemic bleeding2938.7
Coagulopathy (20WBCT) positive810.7
Acute kidney injury1317.3
How to treat wound to preventSecondary infectionImmediate first aid treatment5472.0
Antibiotic prophylaxis4864.0
Tetanus prevention3242.7
Monitoring2432.0
How do you identify either venomous snakebite among suspected patients admitted to health facilities?Presence of two puncture wound2533.3
Small puncture arced wounds1520.0
Severe local swelling3850.7
Difficulty of breathing3344.0
Sweating3040.0
Mild swelling1520.0
Nausea and vomiting3141.3
Do you know name of venomous snakes common in your area?Yes1621.3
No5978.7
What are those common venomoussnakesCobra538.5
Viper323.1
Black snake323.1
Adder215.4
What is the most appropriatemethod you use for controlling local swelling from a snakebite?Tourniquet application4154.7
Immobilization of the limb3344.0
Incision and drainage1114.7
Did you get any training onsnakebite management?Yes1114.7
No6485.3
In your opinion, what are the most effective ways to reduce the burdenof snakebites in your community?Preventive measures4661.3
Enhancing health care access4154.7
Surveillance and Research3546.7
Policy and advocacy1925.3
Community Engagement4053.3

Health professionals relied mainly on the clinical signs of victims, with severe local swelling (50.7%) and systemic symptoms such as difficulty of breathing (44.0%) and nausea/vomiting (41.3%) being key identifiers of venomous snakebites. Reliance on puncture wound patterns is less common, which is clinically appropriate for confirming the bite of venomous snakes. A significant deficit in knowledge was evident in the area of snake species identification, with 78.7% of the respondents being unable to identify venomous snakes common in their area. A major finding of concern is that tourniquet application is the most common method (54.7%) used to control swelling. This practice is medically discouraged, as it can concentrate venom and lead to ischemia and increased tissue damage. Limb immobilization practices were reported by only 44.0% of the respondents, indicating that harmful first aid practices were prevalent. The root cause of these knowledge gaps is the severe lack of formal training (85.3%) for healthcare workers reporting no prior training in snakebite management. The possible solutions reported preventive measures (61.3%), enhancing healthcare access (54.7%), and community engagement (53.3%) as the most effective ways to reduce the snakebite burden.

Community awareness and barriers to prevention measures

A majority of the respondents (61.3%) reported that the community lacked awareness of snakebites (Table 7). Most respondents (69.3%) indicated that their health facility does not provide health education on snakebite prevention, control, and acute management.

Table 7. Community awareness, and health facility practices related to snakebites (n=75).

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
Do you believe that the community is aware ofsnakebite?Yes2938.7
No4661.3
Does snakebite control, prevention, and emergencyfirst aid given as health education in your facility?Yes2330.7
No5269.3
After snakebite, suspected did patients visit yourhealth facility immediatelyYes1013.3
No6586.7
If question #34 ‘No’ what are (is) the most possiblereason (s)?Inadequate antivenom3040.0
Visit traditional healers4053.3
Transportation problem4256.0
Lack of awareness2533.3

The data reveal a critical delay in patients seeking medical care following a snakebite. The majority of respondents (86.7%) reported that snakebite victims do not visit health facilities immediately.

For those who did not seek immediate care, the respondents identified several key barriers. The most frequently cited reason was transportation problems (56.0%), followed closely by traditional healers (53.3%). The inadequate supply of antivenom at the health facility was also a significant (40.0%) barrier.

Discussion

This study highlights the perceptions of health professionals regarding snakebite management in Hamer Wereda. The findings show a significant burden of envenomation, characterized by systemic challenges in prevention, substantial delays in treatment, and difficulties in clinical management. The demographic profile of health professionals indicates that most are young and less experienced, with a severe scarcity (97.3%) of formal snakebite management training. This knowledge gap is troubling, as it means that the majority of victims face inadequate care, and a lack of knowledge in treating cases is a key challenge (19). The limited training for health professionals in snakebite management in this study is greater than that in other hotspot areas (26). Although most professionals reported the availability of antivenoms in their facilities, dependency on donors creates severe vulnerability in the supply chain. This dependence contributes to the widespread insufficiency of antivenom, with over 80% of health facilities not receiving the requested quantities, potentially leading to shortages and poor treatment for snakebite victims. The use of polyvalent antivenom in all facilities suggests a lack of species-specific treatment options, which may influence efficacy. This predominant use of polyvalent antivenom and donor dependency has also been reported in different parts of Ethiopia (28).

Clinical management practices involve diverse adherence to standard guidelines. Local swelling (58.7%) and systemic symptoms are common principles for initiating antivenom therapy, and the use of the twenty minute whole blood clotting test a key diagnostic tool for coagulopathy was reported by only 10.7% of the respondents. Even though the common snake species responsible for envenomations were ambiguous in the study area, local swelling has also been reported as a clinical characteristic of puff adder envenomation (29, 30). More than half (54.7%) of health care providers still consider tourniquet application to be an appropriate method for controlling swelling, a practice discouraged by the WHO due to potential harm (26, 31). This reflects persistent gaps between evidence-based guidelines and on-ground practice. Remarkably, community awareness appears to be very low and lacks snakebite knowledge, and most health facilities do not offer associated health education. This prevention gap, together with access barriers, underscores the intricate nature of the snakebite burden.

Snakebites predominantly affect adults aged 15–60 years, especially farmers and herders, who are prone to occupational exposure during (32, 33). Snakebite envenomation increases during rainy seasons when snakes become active on the ground and farmers work in the field. This finding aligns with that of Dhoble et al. (34), who reported that a majority of snakebites are produced during the rainy season. The majority of male victims, mainly in the older age group (>32 years), strongly indicated that occupational exposure is a key risk factor. This likely represents pastoralists and farmers who spend extensive time in fields and grazing lands, which are environments where human snake conflicts are more credible. In this region, snakebite incidents are more reliably reported during the rainy season, when snakes migrate toward human settlements in search of dry ground and prey.

Delayed presentation was a critical factor, as most patients arrived at health facilities ≥48 hours after exposure, often because of initial visits to traditional healers, transportation barriers or a lack of awareness. A similar study conducted in French Guiana revealed patients were bitten very late after antivenom administration, which is ≥12 hours and is linked to various socio-economic factors (35, 36). These delays, exacerbated by a lack of antivenom and poor referral systems, directly contribute to mortality and complications such as neurotoxic and hemotoxic effects (37, 38). In many cases, snakebite envenomation either receives no medical treatment or is treated only after a significant delay in antivenom administration, which may lead to several long-term complications, including acute kidney failure and necrotic tissue infections, with psychological trauma. This delay is associated with poor health outcomes, including progression to systemic envenomation, irreversible tissue damage, organ failure, and death. The higher rate of delayed presentation among male victims might be related to the nature of their remote worksites, their distance from health facilities, or greater tendency to visit traditional healers first. All disability cases in females and a greater proportion of exposed females died of envenomation, despite a slightly better rate of early presentation. The case fatality rate is too high and points to systemic failure in the chain of survival for snakebite victims (24, 39). The finding indicated that children under twelve years were more affected group that requires immediate prevention and control measures. The highest snakebite incidence in 2024 attributed to climatic factors, such as heavy rainfall flooding, that often drive human-snake encounters. A life threatening concern is the high case fatality rate and Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY), which is high compared to the study conducted in Burkina Faso (40).

Conclusion and recommendations

The findings of this study affirm that snakebite envenomation is a serious public health burden in the study area, with high rates of mortality and inevitable long-term morbidity. This situation is sustained by a confluence of systemic failure and access barriers. Ultimate faults within the healthcare system, including critical shortages of health professionals training and unreliable antivenom supply chains reliant on external donor sources, directly compromise clinical management. These institutional inadequacies are worsened by significant prehospital delays driven by complex cultural beliefs, economic constraints, and insufficient community awareness. There is a distinct and significant gap between internationally recognized snakebite management protocols, and real clinical practices. The simultaneous lack of vigorous, sustained preventive measures and community engagement programs also perpetuates the cycle of risk and poor snakebite outcomes. The persistent morbidity and mortality from snakebite envenomation in this region are not predictable. However, this is a direct result of identifiable and addressable failures through resilient health professionals. A meaningful reduction in the burden of this neglected tropical disease requires vital, harmonized, and targeted intervention strategies. These efforts are initiated through prioritizing the improvement of health professionals’ ability through consistent training, strengthening antivenom logistics, and supply systems, implementing effective community-based prevention and health education initiatives, and eliminating barriers to ensure timely access to proper medical care. On the basis of these findings, a series of multilevel alliances are needed to mitigate the burden of snakebite envenomation in the wereda. The implementation of relevant control and prevention measures through a coordinated one-health approach engaging community, healthcare, and policy stakeholders. The integration of extensive snakebite management into consistent hands on training for all health professionals in high-risk areas is crucial to avoid harmful first, aid practices. Health facilities must adopt and display standard treatment guidelines for snakebite management in all emergency and outpatient departments to monitor their clinical practice. To ensure effective treatment, establishing an essential medicine supply chain is crucial to confirm the consistent and affordable availability of antivenoms at health facilities. Furthermore, vibrant protocols for the transportation of severe snakebite cases and emergency referrals should be established and disseminated to strengthen the referral system. For community and public health interventions, it is essential to institutionalize constant health education programs regarding snakebites. These should include regular awareness sessions focused on snakebite prevention, the risk of treatment delay, and the critical importance of seeking immediate medical care.

Additionally, the documentation of snakebite cases in health facility registries and surveillance systems should be improved to inform future policies and strategies. These findings improve the understanding of local epidemiology and treatment outcomes. Finally, conducting ecological studies to identify the most prevalent venomous snake species in the area is necessary to guide the potential development or procurement of antivenom methods that target local venomous snakes.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Sana Tamim, National Institute of Health, Pakistan

Reviewed by: Rene Kinda, Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Burkina Faso

Gaauri Metkar, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Education and Research (MIMER), India

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was financially supported by the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (RSTMH) in partnership with NIHR with the grant code nihr24021.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics approval

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Scientific and Ethical Review Office. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

JM: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. DM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. AA: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AMA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. FW: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. YT: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Writing – original draft. AW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HF: Validation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. DG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AB: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Validation. DN: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our thanks to the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene for their financial support, study participants, and all health facilities in Hamer wereda for their cooperation throughout the data collection process.

References

  1. 1 World Health Organization. Snakebite Envenoming (2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/snakebite-envenoming (Accessed April 1, 2026).
  2. 2 Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, De Silva N, Kithsiri NG, Arunasalam P, Ranjan P. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PloS Med. (2008) 5: 1591–604. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218
  3. 3 Gabriel A, Manon C, Justin E, Franck W, Carlos O, Eric C. Snakebite epidemiology and health-seeking behavior in Akonolinga health district, Cameroon: Cross-sectional study. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2020) 14: 1 – 15. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008334
  4. 4 Ahmedid S, Koudou GB, Bagot M, François D, Windtaré RB, Caisey P. Health and economic burden estimates of snakebite management upon health facilities in three regions of southern Burkina Faso. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2021) 15: 1 – 17. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009464
  5. 5 Chippaux JP. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analytic approach. Toxicon. (2011) 57: 586–99. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.12.022
  6. 6 Ammouch K, Mesmoudi N, Hammani N, Galan J, Moustaghfir A, Stöcklin R. Tackling the burden of envenomation in Africa: advances, challenges, and strategic priorities for enhanced diagnosis and treatment. FrontTrop Dis. (2025) 6: 1653213. doi: doi:10.3389/fitd.2025.1653213
  7. 7 Steegemans I, Sisay K, Nshimiyimana E, Gebrewold G, Piening T, Menberu Tessema E. Treatment outcomes among snakebite patients in north-west Ethiopia: A retrospective analysis. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2022) 16: e0010148. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0010148
  8. 8 Bhaumik S, Zwi AB, Norton R, Jagnoor J. How and why snakebite became a global health priority: A policy analysis. BMJ Glob Heal. (2023) 8: 8. doi: doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011923
  9. 9 Kasturiratne A, Lalloo DG, Janaka de Silva H. Chronic health effects and cost of snakebite. Toxicon X. (2021) 9-10: 100074. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100074
  10. 10 Mohammed Y, Nafis F, Niguse A, Kaba Z. Epidemiological study of snakebite cases admitted in godey hospital, shebelle zone, Eastern Ethiopia. In: Epidemiology (2022). doi: doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1501675/v1
  11. 11 World Health Organization. Snakebite Envenoming. (2019).
  12. 12 Wafula ST, Namakula LN, Ninsiima LR, Noah KS, Abel WW, Innocent BM. Barriers and opportunities for improving management of snakebites: Perspectives of healthcare workers in Northern Uganda. PloS One. (2023) 18: 1 – 15. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291032
  13. 13 Baleela RMH, Elamin MEMO, Mohammad A, Saeed SAK. Medically important snakes in Sudan: an overview of distribution, clinical features and present challenges. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2025) 119: 541–9. doi: doi:10.1093/trstmh/trae063
  14. 14 Alcoba G, Sharma SK, Bolon I, Carlos O, Sara BM, Manish S. Snakebite epidemiology in humans and domestic animals across the Terai region in Nepal: a multicluster random survey. Lancet Glob Heal. (2022) 10: e398–408. doi: doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00028-6
  15. 15 Wampande LN, Njoroge RN, Wibabara I, Shyaka A, Stienstra Y, Shimelash N. Snake repellent safety and efficacy in Sub-Saharan Africa. What is the evidence ? Front Public Health. (2026) 14: 1783520. doi: doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1783520
  16. 16 Kiran S, Senthilnathan TA. MANAGEMENT of SNAKE ENVENOMATION, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak -124001. INDIA (2003). Update in Anaesthesia.
  17. 17 World Health Organization. Global snakebite burden. Seventy-first world health assembly. Provisional agenda item 12.1. (2018).
  18. 18 Gololo AA, Veettil SK, Anantachoti P, Taychakhoonavudh S, Patikorn C. Epidemiological models to estimate the burden of snakebite envenoming: A systematic review. Trop Med Int Heal. (2025) 30: 71 – 83. doi: doi:10.1111/tmi.14080
  19. 19 Sunil S, Deb PP, Guru PD, Dhan BG. Knowledge of health workers on snakes and snakebite management and treatment seeking behavior of snakebite victims in Bhutan. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2020) 14: 1 – 22. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008793
  20. 20 World Health Organization. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000-2021. Geneva: Department of Data and Analytics Division of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact WHO (2024).
  21. 21 Afsana A, Bodrun NS, Aishwarya NS, Timothy NWJ, Andrew DW. Assessing knowledge and awareness regarding snakebite and management of snakebite envenoming in healthcare workers and the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2023) 17 (2): e0011048. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011048
  22. 22 Fabien T, Timothée D, Yoann M, Laura T, Jean PC, Matthew L. Knowledge, attitude and practices of snakebite management among health workers in Cameroon: Need for continuous training and capacity building. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2018) 12. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006716
  23. 23 Solomon TW, Innocent BM, Lydia NL, Aisha N, Vencia N, Abel WW. Healthcare practitioners ’ knowledge of snakebite management and associated factors in high-burden, low-resource settings in Uganda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2023) 117: 569–79. doi: doi:10.1093/trstmh/trad015
  24. 24 Moses BA, Chiyembekezo K, Benno K, Bright M, Clara S, Beatrice LM. Health care workers’ knowledge on identification, management and treatment of snakebite cases in rural Malawi: A descriptive study. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2022) 16: 1 – 19. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0010841
  25. 25 World Health Organization. Management of Snakebites, 2nd Edition. (2016) New Delhi, India: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg.
  26. 26 Habib AG, Kuznik A, Hamza M, Abdullahi MI, Chedi BA, Chippaux J-P. Snakebite is under appreciated: appraisal of burden from West Africa. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2015) 9: e0004088. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004088
  27. 27 Aga AM, Mulugeta D, Motuma A, Bilise W, Dassalegn M, Henok F. Health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in snakebite management: A study from high-burden areas in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2025) 19: e0013713. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0013713
  28. 28 Abebe MA, Birhanu H, Bethlehem N, Gezahegn K, Sisay K, Amha K. Epidemiological survey of snake bite in Ethiopia. Epidemiol Open Access. (2014) 04: 1 – 5. doi: doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000174
  29. 29 Tianyi FL, Ngari C, Wilkinson M, Stanley P, Elizabeth C, Evans M. Clinical features of puff adder envenoming: case series of Bitis arietans snakebites in Kenya and a scoping review of the literature. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2025) 19 (2): e0012845. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012845
  30. 30 Rushton W, Ryan E, Rivera J, Matthew K, Sukhshant A, Stacy M. After the bite: evaluating a specialized clinic for follow-up care for snake envenomation. Clin Toxicol. (2025) 63: 16 – 22. doi: doi:10.1080/15563650.2024.2425068
  31. 31 Jaideep CM, Omesh KB, Aravind MS, Bawaskar HS, Amarendra M, Dileep P. Cross-sectional survey of the incidence, mortality and socioeconomic burden of snakebite envenoming in India. Nat Commun. (2025) 10: 9871. doi: doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64849-2
  32. 32 Abdullahi A, Yusuf N, Debella A, Eyeberu A, Deressa A, Bekele H. Seasonal variation, treatment outcome, and its associated factors among the snakebite patients in Somali region, Ethiopia. Front Public Health. (2022) 10: 901414. doi: doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.901414
  33. 33 Stephen S, Mohanty CR, Radhakrishnan RV, Alwin I, Jaison J, Nadiya K. Clinico-epidemiological profile, trends, and health-related outcomes of snakebite victims: A one-year prospective study from eastern India. Wilderness Environ Med. (2024) 35: 155–65. doi: doi:10.1177/10806032241239628
  34. 34 Pavan D, Mahesh S, Kenil C, Manthan P. Snakebite envenomation: A comprehensive evaluation of severity, treatment, and outcomes in 100 patients correlating timing of ASV administration with complications. Int J Sci Res Arch. (2024) 11: 757–64. doi: doi:10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0127
  35. 35 Geoffrey KI, Angela LC, Nicholas AB, Jessamine S, Simon GA, Brown SJ. Real world delays in antivenom administration: patient, snake or hospital factors (ASP-33). Clin Toxicol. (2025) 63: 1. doi: doi:10.3390/tropicalmed10040103
  36. 36 Pujo JM, Houcke S, Ngoulla GR, Roger LN, Vivian L, Boubacar S. Effectiveness of late and very late antivenom administration on recovery from snakebite-induced coagulopathy in French Guiana: a population-based study. Lancet Reg Heal Am. (2025) 42: 100994. doi: doi:10.1016/j.lana.2025.100994
  37. 37 Berg P, Theart F, van Driel M, Saaiman EL, Mavoungou LB. Snakebite envenoming in Africa remains widely neglected and demands multidisciplinary attention. Nat Commun. (2024) 15: 1 – 4. doi: doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54070-y
  38. 38 Yoshihiro A, Jonathan P, Patrick JT, Marvin JS, Rustan A, Mariedel AT. Characteristics of snakebite patients due to Naja samarensis in the Philippines: a prospective hospital-based study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2025) 119: 933–42. doi: doi:10.1093/trstmh/trae110
  39. 39 Ayesiga I, Naggayi S, Gmanyami JM, Jonathan MG, Alex A, Olivier K. Snakebite envenomation through a gender intersectionality lens in low- and middle-income countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2025) 119: 665–70. doi: doi:10.1093/trstmh/trae085
  40. 40 Ahmed S, Koudou GB, Bagot M, Drabo F, Bougma WR, Pulford C. Health and economic burden estimates of snakebite management upon health facilities in three regions of southern Burkina Faso. PloS NeglTrop Dis. (2021) 15: e0009464. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009464

Citation

Mohammed, J., et al. (2026). Burden of snakebite and the knowledge of health professionals toward envenomation management in Hamer wereda, South Omo, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases, Volume 7. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
7 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Mohammed, Mulugeta, Alemu, Aga, Woldemariyam, Tesera, Waldetensai, Ferede, Getachew, Bizuneh and Nigussie.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Jemal Mohammed

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0