Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Nanotechnology ·

Volume 8 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2026.1852250

Formulation and evaluation of quinoa seed oil loaded folic acid conjugated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for anti-breast cancer activity

  • Syed Abuzar Raza Rizvi1
  • Rupali Ghosh1
  • Zaid Siddiqui1
  • Nancy Sanjay Gupta1
  • Abul Vafa1
  • Javed Ahmad1
  • Saima Wajid1*corresponding author
  1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

In 2022, female breast cancer ranked as the second most prevalent disease worldwide. Present medications have significant adverse effects that limit their application. Quinoa seed oil (QSO) has an effective role in suppressing cancer, however, their low solubility in aqueous solution has limited their use. The integration of QSO into nanoparticles can enhance their therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to prepare QSO-loaded bovine serum albumin (BSA) nanoparticles conjugated with folic acid (FA) (FA-QSO-BSA NPs) and evaluate their anticancer activity on breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231). QSO extraction was carried out using the Soxhlet extraction technique. FA-QSO-BSA NPs were formulated by the desolvation method. The NPs were characterized using DLS, FTIR, and HPLC techniques. Drug encapsulation efficiency and loading capacity were determined by a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The cytotoxic effects of FA-QSO-BSA NPs were investigated by MTT, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy. The results showed the spherical morphology of FA-QSO-BSA NPs with an average size of 146.4 ± 1.32 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.214 ± 6.1, and a zeta potential of −26.0 ± 5.43 mV. The cytotoxicity effects of FA-QSO-BSA NPs against breast cancer cells were in a concentration-dependent manner. At IC50 concentrations (MCF7 = 64.12 μg/mL and MDA-MB-231 = 79.14 μg/mL), FA-QSO-BSA NPs strongly induced nucleus morphological changes, reduced cell proliferation, increased phosphatidylserine exposure, and arrested the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase. The increased cytotoxicity of FA-QSO-BSA NPs against breast cancer cells, together with their ability to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, underscores their promise as a strong anticancer drug.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Cancer is a significant social, public health, and economic challenge in the 21st century, accounting for about one in six fatalities (16.8%) and one in four deaths (22.8%) from noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) globally (Bray et al., 2021). In 2022, female breast cancer was the second most common illness worldwide, with around 2.3 million new cases, or 11.6% of all cancer diagnoses. The disease is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, resulting in 666,000 deaths (6.9% of total cancer fatalities) (Bray et al., 2024). A systematic investigation of the molecular distinctions between cell lines and tumors indicates that breast cell lines, on average, possess a greater number of genetic mutations and a comparable level of epigenetic alterations relative to the cancers from which they originate. The fundamental molecular characteristics of cell lines, however, are consistent with those of tissue malignancies, apart from a few atypical instances where primary markers have diversified into many variants (Dai et al., 2017).

Conventional approaches to cancer treatment include surgical interventions, frequently paired with chemotherapy and radiation as necessary (Satapathy et al., 2023). Despite their effectiveness, both medications present significant adverse effects that limit their application. As a result, these treatments could be more harmful and lead to various unwanted side effects, as well as detrimental effects on healthy cells in the body (Mirhadi et al., 2020). Herbal products may serve as complementary therapies to alleviate adverse effects while also reducing exposure to chemotherapy and radiation (Greenwell and Rahman, 2015). Phytochemicals can be used as chemotherapeutics that are isolated from various plant extracts, as these phytochemicals have shown diverse effects on anti-tumor, anti-inflammation, anti-oxidant, and anti-bacterial activities (Shrihastini et al., 2021).

Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Is a traditional crop indigenous to Bolivia, Peru, and Chile, which has gained popularity because of its salt resistance and high nutritional value (Pulvento and Bazile, 2023). The seeds of this salt-tolerant crop can be utilized to produce puffy cereals or milled into flour for baking purposes. The genus Chenopodium is globally distributed, with over 200 species, with seed coloration ranging from white to gray and black (Park et al., 2017). Quinoa seed oil (QSO) is rich in essential minerals, including polyphenolics (primarily vanillic acid, ferulic acid, and their derivatives) as well as the principal flavonoids quercetin, kaempferol, and their glycosides; vitamins (ascorbic acid, thiamin, riboflavin, and α-tocopherol); trace elements; and macronutrients (protein and carbohydrates) (Shen et al., 2022). QSO has been recognized in several studies as a preventive agent towards multiple ailments, including cancer, allergic reactions, and inflammatory conditions. Furthermore, they may diminish the risk of cardiovascular disorders (Heck et al., 2019). Several additional in vitro studies have demonstrated the anticancer effects of QSO. QSO demonstrates a significant cytotoxic impact on liver cancer cell lines (Mohamed et al., 2019) and human cervical carcinoma cell lines (Paśko et al., 2019). However, the limited solubility of QSO constrains its utilization in the biological domain, especially in cancer therapy. Incorporation of QSO into nanoparticles can augment their therapeutic efficiency against cancer and enhance their antioxidant activity.

Nanotechnology possesses the potential to offer significant opportunities for the advancement of medical innovations across all fields. In recent years, the pharmaceutical industry has focused on enhancing nanotechnology frameworks applicable in numerous medical sectors, notably in drug delivery (Calzoni et al., 2019). In recent decades, polymeric nanoparticles have demonstrated significant potential as therapeutics in biomedical applications, including controlled drug and gene delivery, tissue engineering, and cancer therapy (Nitta and Numata, 2013). An expanding area of research is the application of nanotechnology in conjunction with phytochemicals. Incorporating nanomaterials can enhance the bioavailability, targeting, and regulated release of phytocompounds (Watkins et al., 2015).

Recent breakthroughs in drug delivery system design have emphasized protein-based nanodrug delivery platforms, classified as substances composed of self-assembled protein subunits of a singular protein or a mixture of proteins forming a cohesive structure. Among the extensive array of proteins employed in nanoparticle preparation, bovine serum albumin (BSA) is extensively exploited owing to its bioavailability, non-toxicity, water solubility, and benign degradation compounds (Tarhini et al., 2018). Bovine serum albumin nanoparticles (BSA-NPs) comprise charged amino acids that non-covalently function as transport mechanisms for diverse phenolic acids, including caffeic acid and salicylic acid, thereby promoting their cellular uptake. The surface characteristics of BSA-NPs, including charge, binding sites, and amino acid content, augment their capacity to bind to phenolic acids. Moreover, the electrostatic adhesion of phenolic acids onto the BSA surface is more efficient when the BSA molecules are much smaller, thereby enhancing the regulation of drug dispersion (Ibrahim et al., 2025).

Recently, various investigators have concentrated on folate receptors that specifically target cancerous tumors, which are overexpressed in cancer cell membranes while exhibiting low expression in normal tissues. Folic acid (FA) exhibits several beneficial characteristics that render it suitable for medication delivery: it is biologically compatible, not immunogenic, stable, and nontoxic (Nosrati et al., 2018a). Folic acid (FA) was utilized exclusively as a surface-targeting ligand to enhance folate receptor-mediated internalization of the nanoparticles. The conjugated FA facilitates nanoparticle uptake in folate receptor-overexpressing cells, hence enhancing targeted drug administration without suggesting a direct impact on cancer cell growth.

Recent research has emphasized the therapeutic potential of QSO-based nano formulations for biomedical applications, especially in cancer treatment. Whey protein isolate-gelatin nanoparticles have been shown to augment the water dispersibility and antioxidant efficacy of QSO, hence enhancing its biological application (Lira et al., 2020). Quinoa oil-alginate-loaded nanoemulsions exhibited considerable anticancer activity in chemically generated breast cancer models, indicating the promise of nanoencapsulation methods in enhancing treatment results (El Makawy et al., 2024a). Additional research shown that the nanoencapsulation of quinoa seed oil through oil in water emulsification augmented its antioxidant capacity and inhibitory effects on digestive enzymes, signifying greater bioactivity through nanoscale delivery (Marques et al., 2024). Moreover, quinoa and chia seed oil nanocapsules were observed to promote tumor growth regression by modulating oncogenic markers such as PIK3CA and MYC, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative activities while ensuring hepatorenal safety in breast cancer models (El makawy et al., 2024b). While these findings generally affirm the potential of QSO nano formulations in cancer treatment, tailored delivery methods utilizing folic acid-conjugated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for breast cancer therapy are still insufficiently investigated.

The present study lies in the development of a folic acid-conjugated bovine serum albumin (FA-BSA) nanoparticle system for the targeted delivery of QSO. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to formulate QSO into FA-conjugated BSA nanoparticles and evaluate its targeted anticancer potential against breast cancer cells. While previous reports have described BSA nanoparticles for drug delivery (Ibrahim et al., 2025), and quinoa oil has been studied for its nutritional benefits (Shen et al., 2022), the combination of active targeting with QSO encapsulation in a protein-based nanocarrier represents a novel strategy. The targeted nanoparticles developed herein hold significant potential for selective delivery of hydrophobic bioactive to folate receptor-overexpressing cancer cells, addressing the dual challenges of poor oil solubility and lack of tumor specificity.

2 Methodology

2.1 Materials

We acquired the non-ionic surfactant Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80) from Merck, India (catalog no. 9005-65-6). MTT (catalog no. 298-93-1), DAPI (catalog no. 28718-90-3), propidium iodide (PI) (catalog no. 25535-16-4), RNase (catalog no. 9001-99-4), and rhodamine (catalog no. 81-88-9) were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories, India. The Annexin V-FITC Early Apoptosis Detection Kit (catalog no. E-CK-A211) was procured from eLabScience, India. We acquired the CFSE proliferation kit from ThermoFisher Scientific-Life Science Solutions (catalog no. C34570), India. BSA (catalog no. 9048-46-8) and FA (catalog no. 59-30-3) were procured from Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Private Limited, India. DMSO (catalog no. 67-68-5), N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (NHS) (catalog no. 6066-82-6), N, N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (catalog no. 538-75-0), triethylamine, and chloroform (catalog no. 67-66-3) were acquired from Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (SRL), India. Double-distilled water was used throughout the experimental procedures (Milli-Q system, Millipore Corporation).

2.2 Isolation of quinoa seed oil (QSO) from quinoa seeds

The Chenopodium quinoa seeds were collected from Kendriya Bhandar, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India, and were further identified by the expert Dr. Fazil Hasan (Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, School of Sciences, Noida International University, Greater Noida, U.P., India) with reference number NIU/SOS/AGRI/ID/2026/01. Oil extraction was carried out using the Soxhlet extraction technique (Mufari et al., 2020). It is a continuous extraction of solid and liquid phases. The solid substance designated for extraction is situated in a thimble composed of a material that retains solids while permitting only liquids to permeate, functioning similarly to filter paper. The thimble is thereafter positioned in the extractor. The organic solvent is heated in reflux, causing the produced vapors to boil. As the vapor ascends, it is condensed by the condenser, which subsequently fills the thimble. This procedure is reiterated until the extraction of all components from the solids is complete (Patel et al., 2019).

Briefly, 200 g of quinoa seeds were finely ground using a mechanical grinder, and the resulting powder was sieved through muslin cloth and air-dried to remove residual moisture. The dried seed powder was placed in the Soxhlet extraction chamber; 600 mL of n-hexane was added to a round-bottom flask as the extraction solvent. The Soxhlet apparatus, consisting of the round-bottom flask, extractor, and condenser, was assembled and secured using clamps. Continuous cooling was maintained by circulating water through the condenser. The solvent was heated using an isomantle, allowing n-hexane to evaporate, condense, and percolate through the seed material. Once the solvent level reached the siphon arm, it was automatically returned to the boiling flask, initiating repeated extraction cycles. The extraction process was continued for 6 h. Following completion, the oil extract was collected in the round-bottom flask, and the solvent was removed by evaporation at 60 °C using a rotary evaporator and kept at 4 °C until required.

2.3 GC-MS analysis

For analyses and identification of compounds in QSO, GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) was performed using a Shimadzu GC-MS-QP 2010 instrument, Mass Hunter\W11N17main.L, established at Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi. An auto injector and mass selective detector were facilitated in the instrument used in this study. The ion source temperature and interface temperature were set at 220 °C and 270 °C, respectively. In addition, the solvent cut time, threshold, and mass range were set to 3.50 min, 1,000 eV, and 40–650 m/z, respectively. A capillary column (Rxi-5 Sil MS) made by the Restek Company in Bellefonte, United States, having specifications of 30 m long, 0.25 m wide, and 0.25 m thick was utilized for the separation of the parts. Parted delivery technique incorporated with split proportion of 10:1, setting thermostat at 260 °C and extracted seed oil injection of 1.0 L, in addition to raising the oven temperature to 300 °C at 10 °C per minute for 16 min, using helium gas as a carrier gas for the investigation. For compound identification, 16.3 and 1.21 mL/min remained for total flow and column flow, respectively. Entries in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database and the WILEY8 spectrum library were carried out through a comparison of their compared accumulation time and mass distribution for determination of elements.

2.4 Preparation of blank bovine serum albumin nanoparticles (blank BSA NPs)

Blank BSA-NPs were synthesized using the desolvation technique (Galisteo-González and Molina-Bolívar, 2014). BSA (100 mg) was solubilized in 2 mL of 10 mM NaCl, with the pH adjusted to eight using 0.1 N NaOH. This was succeeded by stirring for 10 min, after which the desolvating agent, 100% ethanol, was added dropwise (1 mL/min) until an opalescent dispersion was formed. Thereafter, the desolvated BSA-NPs were cross-linked with 10 µL of glutaraldehyde at a concentration of 8% (v/v), and the reaction was maintained under continuous moderate magnetic stirring for 24 h at ambient temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion was subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 35 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was subsequently discarded, and the precipitated BSA-NPs were redispersed in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4).

2.5 Preparation of FA conjugated BSA NPs (FA-BSA NPs)

Folic acid (FA), one-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) were introduced into dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) under light protection to activate FA by stirring at 50 °C. BSA was ultrasonically dissolved in buffer. The activation liquid of FA was incrementally added and let to react under slow stirring in darkness at ambient temperature. Folate-modified albumin nanoparticles (FA-BSA NPs) were acquired during dialysis against 10 mmol/L NaHCO3 and ultrapure water (Liu et al., 2022).

2.6 Preparation of QSO encapsulated BSA NPs (QSO-BSA NPs)

A homogeneous BSA solution was prepared using 0.66 g of BSA and 25 mL of water and stirred for 24 h at 25 °C. This solution was added 0.033 g of QSO and stirred for several hours (solution I). Also, Tween 80 (0.75 g) was dissolved in 25 mL PBS at a concentration of 0.1 M and pH of seven and stirred for 30 min at 25 °C (solution II). Then the former solution was added dropwise to the latter solution under stirring. Finally, the BSA nanoparticles containing QSO were obtained. The freeze-dryer was used to gain a solid powder of the formulation (Angourani et al., 2022).

2.7 Determination of QSO encapsulation efficiency and loading capacity

The effectiveness of QSO encapsulation and loading capacity were assessed using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-1800 series, UV Probe 2.62 software, Shimadzu Japan) (Kunjiappan et al., 2018). QSO-BSA NPs (5 mg) were dispersed in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4; 50 mL) and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C for 45 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant containing unencapsulated QSO was collected and mixed with ethanol to solubilize the free oil. The concentration of QSO in ethanol was determined using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 380 nm. The loading capacity (% (W/W) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) were determined using the following formulas:

EE % = Total drug – Free drug Total drug × 100

Drug Loading % = Entrapped drug Total NP weight × 100

2.8 Synthesis of N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of FA (FA-NHS)

The synthesis of FA-NHS was conducted as illustrated by Al-Rahim et al. (2023). All trials were conducted in darkness to prevent the deterioration of FA. FA (1.5 g; 3.40 mmol) was solubilized in a solution comprising DMSO (25 mL), N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (NHS) (0.445 g; 4.08 mmol), N, N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (1.05 g; 5.10 mmol), and triethylamine (0.25 mL). The resulting solution was activated in a thermostatic water bath at 40 °C and agitated for 48 h at 80 rpm. The by-product of dicyclohexylurea is eliminated using filtering. The resulting FA-NHS filtrate solution was freeze-dried using a lyophilizer (Martin Christ Germany) for 48 h and thereafter kept in a dark environment.

2.9 Formulation of FA conjugated QSO-BSA NPs (FA-QSO-BSA NPs)

The FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles were synthesized by conjugating the carboxylic group of folic acid with the amino group of QSO-BSA nanoparticles (Yang et al., 2014). QSO-BSA nanoparticles (5 mg) were dissolved in 3 mL of carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (pH 10.0; 0.1 M). A DMSO solution of FA-NHS (1 mg/198 mL) was incorporated into the aforementioned mixture and agitated for 2–3 h at ambient temperature. DMSO was eliminated by dialysis with water. A Sephadex G-50 column was utilized to isolate unreacted FA-NHS and other by-products from the FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles. The eluent comprising FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles were subjected to centrifugation for 30 min at 21,000 rpm and subsequently re-dispersed in 4.0 mL of filtered water.

2.10 In vitro QSO release study

The release of QSO from FA-QSO-BSA NPs was investigated in 0.01 M phosphate buffer solutions (pH 3.2, 5.4, and 7.4) at 37 °C using the dynamic dialysis technique (Kunjiappan et al., 2019). The selection of pH 3.2, 5.4, and 7.4 was intended to simulate different physiological environments relevant to oral and gastrointestinal conditions, tumor-associated acidic microenvironment, and physiological blood pH, respectively (Bachta et al., 2025). FA-QSO-BSA NPs (50 mg) were put in a dialysis bag (3,500 Da molecular weight cut-off) situated in a beaker containing 30 mL of phosphate buffer solution and incubated in a shaker at 37 °C and 150 rpm. The selected medium volume was sufficient to maintain the concentration of released QSO below its saturation level, thereby preserving the concentration gradient required for continuous drug diffusion and avoiding saturation-related effects during release analysis (Gupta et al., 2022). The samples were withdrawn at designated time intervals (30 min, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 till 24 h) and substituted with new medium. The obtained supernatant was diluted with ethanol, and the quantity of QSO released from nanoparticles was measured at 380 nm using UV-visible spectrophotometry. All measurements were performed in triplicate. The cumulative amount of drug release over the time period was plotted. The subsequent formula was employed for computations:Where, A0 = absorbance of the control; A1 = absorbance of the sample.

% Drug release = A 0 − A 1 × 100 / A 0

2.11 Characterization of synthesized FA-QSO-BSA NPs, blank BSA NPs, and FA-BSA NPs

2.11.1 Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

The formulated FA-QSO-BSA NPs, blank BSA NPs, and FA-BSA NPs were analyzed for average size distribution (Z-average), polydispersity index (PDI), and Zeta potential using Zeta Sizer Ver. 7.12 (Malvern instrument) at 25 °C. Prior to the experiment, the samples were diluted with MilliQ water to a concentration of 50% to mitigate impact of several scattering effects. The measurement entailed sending a laser beam with a wavelength of 633 nm through a 2 mL aqueous solution at a detection angle of 90 degrees. The polydispersity index, Z-average, and zeta potential were calculated, and a size distribution by intensity graph was generated. The DLS measurements were conducted in triplicate, and the mean standard deviation was determined.

2.11.2 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

The study utilized TEM imaging at the Central Institute Facility, Department of Pharmacy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India, to analyze the surface morphology of the FA-QSO-BSA NPs, blank BSA NPs, and FA-BSA NPs including size, structure, homogeneity, and roughness. The specimen was placed on a carbon grid and subsequently submerged in 2% phosphotungstic acid (PTA) for 2 min. The grid was desiccated and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. The image capture utilized a Tecnai G2, 20 S–twin, FEI electron Optics system, equipped with digital photography capabilities and a 35-mm visual apparatus. Results were recorded using a high-resolution digital CCD camera and analyzed using iTEM software.

2.11.3 Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)

The QSO, BSA, FA, and FA-QSO-BSA NPs underwent FT-IR examination with Varian 7000 FTIR and Varian 600UMA FT-IR microscopes. The samples were collected on a KBr pellet prior to analysis with the FT-IR spectrophotometer. The materials were evaluated by scanning within the wave number range of 4,000 cm-1 to 400 cm-1. The scanning was conducted at a resolution of 2 cm−1, with 16 scans executed for each sample. The data were analyzed with Origin 2021b software.

2.11.4 High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

HPLC analysis was conducted at the Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), Jamia Hamdard, utilizing a Waters HPLC system with a quaternary pump and managed by Empower™ 2 software (Build 2,154 SPs). Before sample analysis, the HPLC system was purged with methanol to remove residual contaminants and particle matter, thereafter equilibrating with the mobile phase composed of methanol. The samples were prepared by dissolving them in a chloroform: methanol combination (2:1, v/v) and subsequently placed into sampling vials. A volume of 20 µL was utilized for all analyses. The chromatographic run time was established at 15 min for the control QSO, while an extended duration of 30 min was utilized for both FA-QSO-BSA NPs and blank BSA-FA NPs. Chromatographic separation was carried out at a detection wavelength of 310.0 nm with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Chromatograms were documented and analyzed with Empower™ 2 software.

2.12 Cytotoxic activity

2.12.1 Cell culture

The breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, together with the non-cancerous HEK293 cell lines, were obtained from NCCS, Pune, India. The cells were grown in DMEM medium (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) (100X, HiMedia, Mumbai, India) at 37 °C in an environment of 95% air and 5% CO2.

2.12.2 In vitro cytotoxicity study

The MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) experiment was conducted to evaluate the cytotoxic effectiveness of QSO (QSO was diluted to 5 mg/mL with 10% DMSO in all cell experiments), formulated FA-QSO-BSA NPs, blank FA-BSA NPs (NPs without QSO encapsulation), and the positive control medication doxorubicin on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines compared with untreated (negative control) cell lines. The cytotoxicity of FA-QSO-BSA NPs was assessed against non-cancerous HEK293 cell lines. The cells were inoculated into 96-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were subjected to QSO, formulated FA-QSO-BSA NPs, blank FA-BSA NPs, and doxorubicin at various concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 250 μg/mL). The cells were subsequently cultured for 24 h. Subsequently, 10 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was applied to each well. The plates were then incubated for a further 4 h. The MTT was removed, and the resulting formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 μL of DMSO, followed by gentle agitation. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm using the microplate reader (SpectraMax 340 PC, Molecular Devices, USA) (Ghosh et al., 2025). The investigations were performed thrice, and the results were presented as the percentage of live cells about the medications under evaluation. The IC50 values were calculated by plotting the percentages of cell viability for MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells versus the sample concentrations using GraphPad Prism 9 software.

% Viability = ( Mean Test OD/Mean untreated Control OD ) × 100

2.12.3 Cellular uptake study

To evaluate cellular uptake, two treatment groups were prepared: FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs (Rhodamine-B-loaded FA-BSA NPs) and a Rho-B-QSO physical mixture (Rhodamine-B and QSO at a 1:5 w/w ratio in PBS containing 0.5% DMSO v/v). 1 mg Rhodamine-B was encapsulated in 1 mL FA-BSA NPs through same procedure as described in Section 2.6 and characterize for zeta size, PDI, and zeta potential by DLS (Supplementary Figure S2). MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (3 × 10^5 cells/well) were seeded in 35 × 60 mm plates on sterile 18 mm round cover slips (Deckglässer) and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the cells were treated with 17 μL of each formulation, incubated for 3–4 h, and then underwent two to three washes with PBS. The cells were fixed with a 4% aqueous solution of paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS. Image analysis was conducted using ImageJ/Fiji (NIH, UNITED STATES) to evaluate Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI). The first raw photographs were subjected to background subtraction using a uniform fixed radius applied consistently across all groups. Images were later transformed into 8-bit format, and a uniform threshold was used across all samples to ensure unbiased segmentation. Whole-cell segmentation was performed using the “Analyze Particles” tool, with size exclusion criteria set to exclude debris while including all intact cells within the field.

The % uptake was calculated as:

Uptake efficiency % = ( MFI FA − Rho − B − BSA NPs ) / ( MFI ​ Rho − B − QSO ) × 100

Fold increase in uptake:

Fold Uptake = MFI FA − Rho − B − BSA NPs / MFI Rho − B − QSO

2.12.4 Nuclear morphology assay

In this investigation, breast cancer cells (3 × 10^5 cells/well) were seeded in 35 × 60 mm plates on sterile 18 mm round cover slips (Deckglässer) and incubated for 24 h. Following incubation, the cells were treated with FA-QSO-BSA NPs and QSO (at the IC50 concentration) and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, both the control cells (untreated) and the cells treated with FA-QSO-BSA NPs and QSO were first fixed with methanol. Subsequently, DAPI (1 μg/mL) was administered to the cells and incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 15 min. The alterations in nuclear morphology were analyzed compared with control cells and determined through confocal microscopy (Leica DMRE) equipped with a confocal head TCS-SPE (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.12.5 Cell proliferation assay

In this study, cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL in 25 cm2 flasks and incubated for 24 h to facilitate adhesion. Following incubation, the cells were trypsinized and transferred into 15 mL polypropylene tubes, then washed 2–3 times with 1X DPBS. The CFSE dye (5 μM) was added to the solution and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min in a water bath. The substance was subsequently centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for a duration of 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was combined with 10 mL of complete media. The mixture was subsequently centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was meticulously combined and re-suspended in the whole medium. The CFSE-labeled cells were subsequently placed in a six-well plate and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were treated with FA-QSO-BSA NPs and QSO at the IC50 concentration and allowed to incubate for 24 h. Subsequently, the CFSE dye-labeled cells were subjected to cytometric analysis using the BD-LSR II flow cytometer. The CFSE distribution was analyzed utilizing FCS Express Flow Cytometry Software - De Novo Software.

2.12.6 Apoptotic assay

In this investigation, cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL in 25 cm2 flasks and incubated for 24 h to promote adhesion. Following incubation, cells were treated with FA-QSO-BSA NPs and QSO at the IC50 concentration, whereas untreated cells served as controls. Following treatment, both control and treated cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) were harvested and re-suspended in 500 µL of Annexin-V binding buffer. 5 μL of Annexin-V FITC and propidium iodide were administered to each tube. The samples were thereafter incubated in darkness at room temperature for 15–20 min. Apoptosis analysis was performed using a BD LSR II Flow Cytometer, acquiring 25,000 events per sample. The apoptotic distribution was analyzed utilizing FCS Express Flow Cytometry Software - De Novo Software.

2.12.7 Cell cycle arrest analysis

Cell-cycle analysis was performed by evaluating the DNA content in both treated and untreated cells using flow cytometry following propidium iodide (PI) staining. In this experiment, cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10^6 cells/mL in a 25 cm2 flask and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, cells were treated with the IC50 concentration of FA-QSO-BSA NPs and QSO, followed by an additional incubation period of 24 h. The cells were then trypsinized and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and 4 mL of 70% ethanol was added to the pellet, which was subsequently incubated on ice for 30 min for fixation. Subsequently, the cells were subjected to centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was reconstituted in 200 μL of PBS. 50μL of RNase was added to the solution and kept on ice for 30 min to enhance RNase activity. Subsequently, 5 μL of propidium iodide was added and incubated in the dark for 5 min. The resulting mixture was subsequently analyzed using the BD-LSR II Flow Cytometer. Each sample documented 25,000 occurrences. Cell cycle arrest was assessed using FCS Express Flow Cytometry Software - De Novo Software.

2.13 Statistical analysis

The study was conducted in three biological and experimental replicates. The GraphPad Prism software (Version 9.0) was utilized to determine statistically significant outcomes (p < 0.05). An unpaired t-test was used to compare two groups, while a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test was applied to assess three groups. Data is expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

3 Results

3.1 GC-MS

QSO is a complex combination of notably bioactive constituents, including polyphenols, saponins, betanin, sterols, and unsaturated fatty acids. The predominant fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) include linoleic acid (46.67%), palmitic acid (11.87%), oleic acid (10.03%), erucic acid (7.57%), and stearic acid (1.56%). The GC-MS chromatogram had shown 63 active compounds present in the QSO as shown in Table 1. GC-MS reported 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid as the constituent with the highest peak area % of 45.42%, followed by Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (11.63%); 13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z) (9.41%); Squalene (6.07%); and 13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z) (5.15%), as shown in Figure 1A.

TABLE 1. Compounds identified by GC-MS analysis of Quinoa seed oil.

PeakRetention timeArea %NameFormula
12.1720.59CyclohexaneC6H12
210.3270.05Benzene, 1,3-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)C14H22
310.6290.02PentadecaneC15H32
413.4660.04Dodecane, 1-iodoC12H25I
513.6810.03Phenol, 2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)C14H22O
613.7970.03Undecanoic acid, 10-methyl-, methyl esterC12H24O2
715.9020.03Methyl myristoleateC15H28O2
815.9750.04Docosane, 1-iodoC22H45I
916.1180.51Methyl tetradecanoateC15H30O2
1014.0210.045-chloro-3-(2′-hydroxyethyl)quinol in-2(1H)-oneC11H10ClNO2
1117.3670.18Pentadecanoic acid, methyl esterC16H32O2
1218.3250.05Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl esterC17H34O2
1318.4320.057,10-Hexadecadienoic acid, methyl esterC17H30O2
1418.5430.217-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C17H32O2
1518.6200.629-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C17H32O2
1619.12111.63Hexadecanoic acid, methyl esterC17H34O2
1720.2920.22Heptadecanoic acid, methyl esterC18H36O2
1820.3900.26cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid, methyl esterC18H34O2
1920.8110.15Heptadecanoic acid, methyl esterC18H36O2
2021.5350.4211-Octadecenoic acid, methyl esterC19H36O2
2121.8270.076,9,12-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl esterC19H30O2
2222.63145.429,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl esterC19H34O2
2322.7229.4113-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C19H36O2
2422.8711.53Methyl stearateC19H38O2
2522.9320.209,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)C18H32O2
2623.4320.129,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)C18H32O2
2723.5790.50(Z)-17-Methyl-7-octadecenoic acid methyl esterC20H38O2
2824.0310.12cis-10-Nonadecenoic acid, methyl esterC20H38O2
2924.1160.07cis-10-Nonadecenoic acid, methyl esterC20H38O2
3025.3420.34Cyclohexaneethanol, .beta.-methyleneC8H14O
3125.4390.999-Octadecen-12-ynoic acid, methyl esterC19H30O2
3225.6270.09Methyl 18-methylnonadecanoateC21H42O2
3325.7510.48cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic acid, methyl esterC21H38O2
3425.8764.10cis-Methyl 11-eicosenoateC21H40O2
3525.9500.1711-Eicosenoic acid, methyl esterC21H40O2
3626.2711.49Methyl 18-methylnonadecanoateC21H42O2
3726.4870.105-Oxatricyclo[8.2.0.04,6]dodecane, 4,12,12-trimethyl-9-methylene-, (1 R,4 R,6 R,10 S)C15H24O
3826.7250.082,5-Furandione, 3-(2-dodecenyl)dihydroC16H26O3
3926.9510.10Methyl octadecan-9,10-dien-13-onoateC19H32O3
4027.4850.07Heneicosanoic acid, methyl esterC22H44O2
4127.9330.14Heneicosanoic acid, methyl esterC22H44O2
4228.2330.065-Isoxazolepropanamide, 3-chloro-N -(2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-6-yl)C12H13ClN2O
4328.3660.145-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl]-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahy dro-1,5-benzothiazepin-3-yl acetatC22H26N2O4S
4428.9860.93Docosanoic acid, methyl esterC23H46O2
4529.2245.1513-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C23H44O2
4629.2930.2413-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C23H44O2
4729.5822.03Docosenoic acid, methyl esterC23H44O2
4830.2850.093,6-Dimethoxy-11-phenyl-13-oxatetracyclo[6.4.1.0(2,7).0(9,12)]tridec a-2,4,6,10-tetraene-10-carbaldehydC23H48O
4930.6960.44Tricosanoic acid, methyl esterC24H48O2
5031.1020.26Tricosanoic acid, methyl esterC24H48O2
5131.4520.11Dl-.alpha.-tocopherolC29H50O2
5231.9660.229,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl esterC21H38O4
5332.0530.39Tetracosanoic acid, methyl esterC28H44O
5432.1370.25Ergosta-5,7,9(11),22-tetraen-3-ol,(3.beta.,22E)C24H46O2
5532.2581.0815-Tetracosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)C25H48O2
5632.6051.02Tetracosanoic acid, methyl esterC24H50O2
5733.1460.02ErgosterolC28H44O
5833.2860.02ErgosterolC28H44O
5933.6730.04Pentacosanoic acid, methyl esterC26H52O2
6034.0946.07SqualeneC30H50
6134.9450.19EicosaneC20H42
6235.1090.26Methyl 17-hexacosenoateC27H52O2
6335.4280.23Hexacosanoic acid, methyl esterC27H54O2
**(A)** Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) chromatogram of quinoa seed oil (QSO), showing the presence of multiple bioactive phytoconstituents with distinct retention times. **(B)** Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of FA-QSO-BSA NPs demonstrating a mean hydrodynamic particle size (Z-average) of 146.4 nm with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.214. **(C)** Zeta potential analysis of FA-QSO-BSA NPs exhibiting a surface charge of −26.0 mV. **(D)** Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of FA-QSO-BSA NPs (Scale bar = 50 nm) revealing predominantly spherical morphology with nanoscale dimensions and relatively uniform particle distribution. **(E)** Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of quinoa seed oil, folic acid, QSO-loaded BSA NPs (QSO-BSA NPs), and FA-QSO-BSA NPs demonstrating characteristic absorption peaks and shifts associated with functional group interactions, confirming successful encapsulation of QSO and conjugation of folic acid onto the NPs surface.
Figure 1. (A) Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) chromatogram of quinoa seed oil (QSO), showing the presence of multiple bioactive phytoconstituents with distinct retention times. (B) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of FA-QSO-BSA NPs demonstrating a mean hydrodynamic particle size (Z-average) of 146.4 nm with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.214. (C) Zeta potential analysis of FA-QSO-BSA NPs exhibiting a surface charge of −26.0 mV. (D) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of FA-QSO-BSA NPs (Scale bar = 50 nm) revealing predominantly spherical morphology with nanoscale dimensions and relatively uniform particle distribution. (E) Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of quinoa seed oil, folic acid, QSO-loaded BSA NPs (QSO-BSA NPs), and FA-QSO-BSA NPs demonstrating characteristic absorption peaks and shifts associated with functional group interactions, confirming successful encapsulation of QSO and conjugation of folic acid onto the NPs surface.

3.2 Characterization of FA-QSO-BSA NPs

3.2.1 DLS

DLS is a method for ascertaining the particle size distribution (Zeta Size), PDI, and Zeta Potential of FA-QSO-BSA NPs. Figures 1B,C illustrate the mean hydrodynamic diameter of FA-QSO-BSA NPs, approximately 146.4 ± 1.32 nm, a PDI of 0.214 ± 6.1, and a zeta potential of −26.0 ± 5.43 mV. Supplementary Figure S1A demonstrate DLS analysis of QSO-BSA NPs and FA-BSA NPs demonstrating a mean hydrodynamic particle size (Z-average) of 141.1 ± 6.7 and 145.0 ± 3.2, respectively with a PDI of 0.265 ± 1.5 and 0.255 ± 2.3, respectively. Supplementary Figure S1B illustrate zeta potential analysis of QSO-BSA NPs and FA-BSA NPs exhibiting a surface charge of −10.4 ± 4.2 and −10.6 ± 5.9, respectively.

3.2.2 TEM

The TEM image of FA-QSO-BSA NPs illustrates effective nanoparticle synthesis with distinct shapes. The particles generally exhibit a spherical to near-spherical morphology with thick, electron-opaque cores, signifying efficient encapsulation of QSO inside the BSA matrix. The nanoparticles were predominantly discrete; however, some aggregations were noted in specific areas, likely due to sample drying during grid preparation. The FA-conjugated nanoparticles (FA-QSO-BSA NPs) exhibited a smooth and compact surface morphology under TEM, indicating a stable nanoparticle architecture with an average dry core diameter of 50 ± 5.6 nm as observed in Figure 1D. The unconjugated QSO-BSA NPs showed spherical morphology with mean size of 91.8 ± 7.2 nm (Supplementary Figure S1C). The spherical morphology was preserved after conjugation, confirming that the formulation process does not disrupt nanoparticle integrity. Supplementary Figure S1C revealed TEM image of QSO-BSA NPs and FA-BSA NPs revealing predominantly spherical morphology with nanoscale dimensions and relatively uniform particle distribution.

3.2.3 FT-IR

The FTIR spectrum of QSO displayed a significant absorption peak at 1743 cm-1, indicative of the ester carbonyl (C=O) stretching vibration, with typical aliphatic C–H stretching bands at 2,922 and 2,853 cm-1. In the spectra of QSO-loaded BSA NPs, prominent Amide I and Amide II bands were seen at 1,650 cm-1 and 1,540 cm-1, respectively, affirming the proteinaceous composition of the BSA carrier system. The ester carbonyl peak was seen at 1741 cm-1, exhibiting a little shift from 1743 cm-1, which signifies the effective encapsulation of QSO within the nanoparticle matrix without considerable chemical degradation. The FTIR spectrum of FA exhibited distinctive aromatic ring vibrations at 1,604 and 1,483 cm-1, signifying its structural fingerprint. The spectra of FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles exhibited the simultaneous existence of these distinctive peaks. A significant widening in the O–H/N–H stretching area (3300–3400 cm-1) was seen, accompanied by FA fingerprint bands superimposed on the BSA amide backbone, therefore verifying the effective surface conjugation of FA to the QSO-loaded BSA nanoparticles as shown in Figure 1E.

3.2.4 HPLC

The chromatographic profile of the QSO had four prominent peaks at RT 2.053, 2.815, 3.148, and 4.334 min. Conversely, the chromatogram of blank BSA–FA NPs exhibited three distinct peaks with RT of 1.861, 3.109, and 4.278 min, which were ascribed to the constituents of the BSA–FA nanoparticle matrix. The chromatographic analysis of FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles revealed six peaks. The peaks identified at RT of 1.812, 3.115, and 4.276 min closely align with those seen in blank BSA–FA nanoparticles, indicating the inclusion of the nanoparticle carrier matrix in the formulation. Supplementary peaks identified at retention times of 2.657, 2.833, and 3.343 min exhibited correlation with peaks in free QSO, suggesting the existence of QSO within the nanoparticle formulation as shown in Figure 2A. Minor variations in retention durations may result from interactions between QSO components and the BSA–FA matrix during encapsulation.

**(A)** High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograms of free quinoa seed oil (QSO), blank BSA–FA NPs, and FA-QSO-BSA NPs. **(B)** *In vitro* drug release profile of QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs under different pH conditions (pH 3.2, pH 5.4, and pH 7.4) over a 24 h period. Drug release exhibited a sustained and pH-responsive pattern, with a comparatively higher release observed at pH 7.4, followed by pH 5.4, while the lowest release was observed at pH 3.2. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the treatment groups at different time points (*P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001) using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest. Data are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2. (A) High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograms of free quinoa seed oil (QSO), blank BSA–FA NPs, and FA-QSO-BSA NPs. (B) In vitro drug release profile of QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs under different pH conditions (pH 3.2, pH 5.4, and pH 7.4) over a 24 h period. Drug release exhibited a sustained and pH-responsive pattern, with a comparatively higher release observed at pH 7.4, followed by pH 5.4, while the lowest release was observed at pH 3.2. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the treatment groups at different time points (*P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001) using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest. Data are represented as mean ± SD.

3.3 Drug encapsulation efficiency and loading capacity

The encapsulation efficiency (EE) of QSO–BSA NPs was determined using UV–Visible spectrophotometry. The overall QSO-BSA NPs concentration was 1.231 mg, but the quantity of free (unentrapped) QSO quantified in the supernatant was 0.768 mg. The quantity of encapsulated QSO was determined to be 0.463 mg. The entrapment efficiency was calculated to be 37.61% based on these figures. The drug loading percentage was determined by the weight of the encapsulated QSO in relation to the total weight of the nanoparticles. The weight of the entrapped QSO was 0.463 mg, and the overall weight of the nanoparticles was 1.231 mg. Accordingly, the drug loading efficiency was found to be 19.26%. In addition, while optimization of formulation of QSO–BSA NPs significantly improves EE and DL (Supplementary Methods and Results section), the optimized batch was not evaluated in biological assays, and future studies would address this.

3.4 In vitro QSO release study

The QSO was gradually and steadily released from the FA-QSO-BSA NPs, as seen in Figure 2B. QSO was released from NPs in 30 min at 1% (pH 3.2), 2% (pH 5.4), and 4% (pH 7.4). After the first half hour, NPs gradually increased the amount of QSO released, which was approximately 10.5% (pH 3.2), 25% (pH 5.4), and 32% (pH 7.4) after 4 h. The release of QSO from FA-QSO-BSA NPs was significantly impacted by pH variations. After 20 h, there was a noticeable rise in the total amount and rate of QSO released from FA-QSO-BSA NPs (at pH 3.2, 5.4, and 7.4, the release rates were 72.53%, 85.98%, and 94.65%, respectively) (*P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001). QSO release was more effective at neutral pH 7.4 and at pH 5.4 than pH 3.2, according to the observed experimental results as shown in Figure 2B.

3.5 In vitro cytotoxicity study

The cells were exposed to several concentrations of FA-QSO-BSA NPs, QSO, and blank FA-BSA NPs. It was observed that the FA-QSO-BSA NPs effectively suppressed the proliferation of breast cancer cells at IC50 values of 64.12 μg/mL and 79.14 μg/mL for MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, FA-QSO-BSA NPs did not exhibit any inhibitory effect on non-cancerous HEK293 cells (Figure 3). Considering the cytotoxicity of QSO with respect to IC<sub>50</sub> indicates that 150.12 μg/mL and 165.12 μg/mL of QSO were required to eradicate half the population (50%) of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (P < 0.05), respectively. Blank FA-BSA NPs did not show any inhibitory effect on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231.

Cell viability analysis of **(A)** MCF-7 **(B)** MDA-MB-231 and **(C)** HEK293 cells following 24 h treatment with unloaded BSA–FA NPs, free quinoa seed oil (QSO), doxorubicin, and QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs at different concentrations (20–250 μg/mL). The QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs demonstrated a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability, showing enhanced cytotoxicity compared to control (untreated), free QSO and unloaded NPs. Minimal changes in cell viability were observed in HEK293 cells following treatment with QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs compared with cancer cell lines, suggesting reduced toxicity toward normal cells. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance between groups is indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001 using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.
Figure 3. Cell viability analysis of (A) MCF-7 (B) MDA-MB-231 and (C) HEK293 cells following 24 h treatment with unloaded BSA–FA NPs, free quinoa seed oil (QSO), doxorubicin, and QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs at different concentrations (20–250 μg/mL). The QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs demonstrated a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability, showing enhanced cytotoxicity compared to control (untreated), free QSO and unloaded NPs. Minimal changes in cell viability were observed in HEK293 cells following treatment with QSO-loaded BSA–FA NPs compared with cancer cell lines, suggesting reduced toxicity toward normal cells. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance between groups is indicated as *P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and **P < 0.0001 using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.

3.6 Cellular uptake study

A fluorescent lipophilic substance (Rhodamine-B) was added to the prepared FA-BSA NPs (FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs) and QSO (Rho-B-QSO) to ascertain the internalization of FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs and Rho-B-QSO in breast cancer cells. After 4 h of incubation, FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs was effectively absorbed inside the cytoplasm of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, as shown in Figure 4. Cells treated with FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs exhibit a greater fold increase in cellular uptake compared to those treated with Rho-B-QSO, with increases of 4.2 in MCF-7 and 3.0 in MDA-MB-231, respectively.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of **(A)** MCF-7 and **(B)** MDA-MB-231 cells following 24 h treatment with FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs, Rho-B-QSO, and untreated control cells. Cells treated with FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs exhibited markedly enhanced intracellular fluorescence intensity compared with Rho-B-QSO-treated cells. Untreated control cells showed negligible fluorescence signals. Corresponding fluorescence intensity histograms and region-of-interest (ROI) analyses further confirmed increased fluorescence distribution in FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs-treated MCF-7 cells. Scale bar = 25 µm.
Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of (A) MCF-7 and (B) MDA-MB-231 cells following 24 h treatment with FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs, Rho-B-QSO, and untreated control cells. Cells treated with FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs exhibited markedly enhanced intracellular fluorescence intensity compared with Rho-B-QSO-treated cells. Untreated control cells showed negligible fluorescence signals. Corresponding fluorescence intensity histograms and region-of-interest (ROI) analyses further confirmed increased fluorescence distribution in FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs-treated MCF-7 cells. Scale bar = 25 µm.

3.7 Nuclear morphology assay

DAPI staining of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells revealed normal nuclear morphology in control cells, but QSO treated cells resulted in nuclear condensation and structural modifications. Whereas, in FA-QSO-BSA NPs induced more significant chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, signifying increased apoptosis-related nuclear alterations relative to free QSO treatment as shown in Figure 5.

Confocal images of DAPI nuclear staining (scale bar for MCF-7 = 25 μm and for MDA MB-231 = 25 μm).
Figure 5. Confocal images of DAPI nuclear staining (scale bar for MCF-7 = 25 μm and for MDA MB-231 = 25 μm).

3.8 Cell proliferation assay

The CFSE fluorescent dye was employed to confirm the findings of the MTT assay in the cell proliferation assay. Figure 6 illustrates the proliferation pattern of the FA-QSO-BSA NPs labeled with CFSE in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) compared to the control (untreated) and QSO-treated cells. The cell growth rate was reduced from 99.5% to 73.2% in control and QSO-treated cells, respectively, to 54.8% in FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MCF-7 cells (*P < 0.001) and from 97.6% to 76.4% in control and QSO-treated cells, respectively, to 53.9% in FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MDA-MB-231 cells (**P < 0.0001), as observed in Figure 6.

CFSE cell proliferation assay **(A)** Plots and **(B)** Graph showing the percentage of viable cells. Data are representative of three experiments expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.
Figure 6. CFSE cell proliferation assay (A) Plots and (B) Graph showing the percentage of viable cells. Data are representative of three experiments expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.001, **P < 0.0001, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.

3.9 Apoptotic assay

The FA-QSO-BSA NPs-treated cells exhibited a notable rise in the proportion of PI-Annexin-V FITC + cells (indicating early apoptosis) and a reduction in PI-Annexin-V FITC- cells (indicating viable cells) compared to the control cells. The percentage of cells in the early stages of apoptosis increased from 0.07% to 32.05% and from 0.19% to 27.20%, respectively, in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (P < 0.01) as observed in Figure 7. Whereas, the percentage of cells in the early stages of apoptosis increased from 0.07% to 16.30% and from 0.19% to 6.91%, respectively, in the QSO-treated MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (P < 0.01).

Apoptosis assay **(A)** Plot and Graph denoting annexin V/PI staining used to monitor cells (FITC + PI+) are shown in Q3 and Q2 quadrant, respectively **(B)** The percentage of early apoptotic cells. Data are representative of three experiments expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.
Figure 7. Apoptosis assay (A) Plot and Graph denoting annexin V/PI staining used to monitor cells (FITC + PI+) are shown in Q3 and Q2 quadrant, respectively (B) The percentage of early apoptotic cells. Data are representative of three experiments expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.

3.10 Cell cycle arrest analysis

The assay results demonstrated that the percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase increased from 55.7% in control (Untreated) MCF-7 cells to 82.2% in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MCF-7 cells (P < 0.05). Conversely, the percentage of cells in the G2/M and S phases decreased from 23.5% to 20.8% in control (Untreated) MCF-7 cells to 7.7% and 10.1% in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MCF-7 cells, respectively (P < 0.05). Similarly, the percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase increased from 55.9% in control (Untreated) MDA-MB-231 cells to 80.7% in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MDA-MB-231 cells (P < 0.05). Conversely, the percentage of cells in the G2/M and S phases decreased from 24.3% to 19.8% in control (Untreated) MDA-MB-231 cells to 8.3% and 11.0% in the FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated MDA-MB-231 cells (P < 0.05), respectively (Figure 8). The findings from the cell cycle study indicate that both cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA MB-231) experienced cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. In QSO-treated MCF-7 cells, the G0/G1 phase increased to 62.8%, and the S and G2/M phases increased to 20.9% and 16.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, in QSO-treated MDA-MB-231 cells, the G0/G1 phase increased to 66.6%, and the S and G2/M phases increased to 21.1% and 12.3%, respectively (P < 0.05).

Cell cycle study by propidium iodide (PI) **(A)** Plots and **(B)** Graph depicting percentage of cells in G0/G1, G2/M and S phase. The values are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.
Figure 8. Cell cycle study by propidium iodide (PI) (A) Plots and (B) Graph depicting percentage of cells in G0/G1, G2/M and S phase. The values are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, when FA-QSO-BSA NPs treated cells compared with control and QSO treated cells using one way ANOVA Tukey posttest.

4 Discussion

A chemical characterization of the principal lipid components, specifically triacylglycerols, fatty acids, and the unsaponifiable fraction, in a sample of QSO is detected by GC-MS. In this study, GC-MS analysis of QSO identified 63 active compounds. QSO contained a prominent amount of 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (45.42%); Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (11.63%); 13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z) (9.41%); Squalene (6.07%); and 13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z) (5.15%). The chemical 9,12-octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester (Z, Z), has significant anticancer efficacy against the A549 human lung cancer cell line. 9,12-octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester (Z, Z), is a bifunctionally unsaturated fatty acid, typically present in plant glycosides. It is an essential fatty acid in the mammalian diet and has a role in the synthesis of prostaglandins and cellular membranes (Ukwubile et al., 2019). Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihyperlipidemic, and antibacterial properties (Yu et al., 2005). Similar findings have been made regarding the anticancer activity of 13-dodecanoic acid methyl ester E and 13-octadecenoic acid methyl ester (Z, Z) against a prostate cancer cell line with an IC50 value of 32.11 ± 0.41 (Yu et al., 2005), with antioxidant and anticancer properties. 13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (E), has been isolated initially from the leaves of Physalis angulata (Solanaceae) and other plant families. It exhibits anticancer and antioxidant properties (Mizushina et al., 1996). Squalene has demonstrated preventive effects against several carcinogens. A protective effect was discovered when squalene was administered before and/or during carcinogen exposure. Experimental investigations have demonstrated that squalene can successfully impede chemically induced skin carcinogenesis in animals (Smith, 2000). Ganesan and Manivel (2018) evaluated the anticancer potential of squalene isolated from the leaves of Canthium coromandelicum against liver cancer cells (HepG2). Results demonstrated a concentration-dependent reduction in cancer cell viability, with an IC50 value of 100 μg/mL and a marked decrease in cell survival to 32.8%. The findings suggest that squalene exhibits significant anticancer activity.

In our investigation, QSO was encapsulated in BSA-NPs and conjugated with FA to improve solubility and anti-breast cancer efficacy. The incorporation of target-specific ligands into nanoparticle systems enables the precise identification and binding to receptors on cancer cells, hence enhancing the targeting efficiency of the carrier and the therapeutic index of the conjugated medication. Albumin’s surface, comprising carboxyl and amine groups, facilitates covalent interactions with desired ligands, enabling diverse surface modifications, enrichments, and functionalization of albumin nanoparticles (Ibrahim et al., 2025). Folate receptors are markedly overexpressed in several human cancer cells, such as those in breast cancer, while exhibiting modest expression in healthy organs (Siwowska et al., 2017). Folic acid is non-immunogenic, stable throughout a wide spectrum of pH levels and temperatures, and possesses a distinctive capacity to bind to folate receptors following conjugation with drug-loaded albumin nanoparticles. Upon binding to the receptors, folate is absorbed into the cell via the endocytic route. A little decrease in pH (to around 5) alters the receptor’s conformation, resulting in the dissociation of folate from the receptor and the subsequent release of the loaded drug into the cell (Alpers, 2016). In our study, the FA-QSO-BSA NPs demonstrated an average particle size of 146.4 ± 1.32 nm. Prior studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles measuring 100–250 nm can efficiently aggregate in malignant tissues owing to the permeability of tumor vasculature. For example, the hydrophobic bexarotene (BEX) was encapsulated onto a BSA surface and then conjugated with folic acid. The resultant nanocomposite had a diameter of roughly 200 nm, signifying a limited size dispersion (Qi et al., 2014). This size closely resembles that of our nanocomposite (FA-QSO-BSA NPs) developed in our research. Given the extensive vascularization linked to breast malignancies, nanoparticles of this dimension are anticipated to effectively traverse the cell membrane through both active targeting via folic acid (FA) receptors and passive targeting mechanisms (Tseng et al., 2008). Additionally, a prior study verified that A549 cells showed strong folic acid binding, improving BEX’s selectivity and effectiveness while encouraging apoptosis and lowering the drug’s toxicity to healthy cells (Srivastava and Prajapati, 2020).

The polydispersity index (PDI) indicates the consistency in the size distribution of nanoparticle populations, ranging from 0.0 to 1, where 0 signifies an ideal uniform distribution of particle sizes and one denotes significant polydispersity with various particle size groups. For a nanoparticle, PDI values of 0.2 and less are predominantly documented in studies (Gaur et al., 2023). The PDI value was 0.214 ± 6.1, indicating a reasonably narrow variation of particle sizes. The statistics demonstrated that the PDI value of our NPs falls within the uniform size range.

Our findings verified that the zeta potential of the FA-QSO-BSA NPs was −26.0 ± 5.43 mV. This number, ranging from +30 to −30 mV, indicates that the nanoparticles are stable. Zeta potential is a critical parameter for the stability of nanoparticles in a colloidal form (Zhang et al., 2008). The zeta potential of blank FA-BSA-NPs was measured at −10 mV. Following loading with QSO, the zeta potential significantly shifted to −26 mV. This increase in negative surface charge is attributed to the ionizable free fatty acids present in QSO. QSO is rich in unsaturated fatty acids, particularly linoleic acid (C18:2, ∼55%) and oleic acid (C18:1, ∼15%), which contain free carboxyl groups (Mohamed Ahmed et al., 2021). At physiological pH (7.4), these carboxyl groups (pKa ∼4.8–5.0) undergo deprotonation, generating additional negative charges at the NPs and water interface. Furthermore, the incorporation of hydrophobic oil may induce minor conformational changes in BSA. Ballicu et al. (2026) demonstrated that BSA undergoes conformational rearrangement upon nanoparticle interaction, exposing buried anionic residues and contributing to the net surface charge. The elevated zeta potential (negative/positive) of the drug-loaded nanoparticles suggested the presence of robust repulsive forces that enhanced particle stability and inhibited nanoparticle aggregation.

The functional features, particularly physical form and size, significantly influence uptake, elimination, residence in circulation, and cellular penetration of the nanoparticles (Sabourian et al., 2020). Nanoparticle shape significantly influences circulation time in the bloodstream, retention inside blood vessels, and uptake by cancer cells (Vagena et al., 2025). A study on the preparation of gold nanostructures of comparable size but varying shapes: nanospheres, nanodisks, nanorods, and nanocages, revealed that nanospheres exhibited the longest circulation time in the bloodstream and the highest altogether uptake in breast cancer in mice (Xu et al., 2023). Similarly, Huang et al. (2012) investigated the size-dependent infiltration of spherical gold nanoparticles in breast cancer cells, tumor spheroids, and murine tumors, demonstrating that smaller gold nanoparticles exhibited superior cellular uptake, deeper tumor penetration, and enhanced accumulation due to improved uptake characteristics, with localization in both the cytoplasm and nucleus; additionally, TEM analysis of spheroid cellular microstructure revealed that surface-adjacent cells remained healthy, resembling monolayer cultures, whereas central cells showed apoptotic or injury-associated features, including marked chromatin compaction, segregation, and nuclear fragmentation. This was a significant benefit of the nanocarrier drug delivery technology. TEM examination verified the effective synthesis of FA-QSO-BSA nanoparticles exhibiting a well-defined spherical to near-spherical shape and consistent nanoscale dimensions. The existence of electron-dense cores signifies effective encapsulation of QSO inside the BSA matrix and indicates that FA conjugation did not undermine nanoparticle integrity, hence affirming structural stability. Minor aggregation found in some places is likely attributable to drying artifacts during grid preparation rather than formulation instability. Our result aligns with the study by Ibrahim et al. (2025).

The FTIR results validate the effective encapsulation of QSO inside the BSA NPs and conjugation of FA. The distinctive ester carbonyl peak of QSO at 1743 cm-1 and its little shift to 1741 cm-1 in the NP spectra signify successful entrapment without chemical degradation, implying physical encapsulation rather than structural modification of the QSO. The significant Amide I (1,650 cm-1) and Amide II (1,540 cm-1) bands substantiate the proteinaceous structure of BSA and affirm the creation of nanoparticles. The retention of these amide peaks following oil loading indicates the structural integrity of the carrier system. The emergence of FA-specific aromatic ring vibrations at 1,604 and 1,483 cm-1 in the conjugated nanoparticles, along with the widening in the O–H/N–H stretching region (3300–3400 cm-1), corroborates effective surface functionalization. The presence of typical peaks for BSA, QSO, and FA indicates successful formulation development, validating encapsulation efficiency and stable FA conjugation while preserving nanoparticle architecture. Our findings are aligning with the earlier findings of Sadeghzadeh et al. (2023).

In the present study, HPLC analysis was primarily performed to characterize and confirm the presence of QSO and to ensure formulation integrity rather than for routine quantification during entrapment and release studies. The chromatographic results demonstrate that QSO was successfully encapsulated in the FA-conjugated BSA nanoparticle system without causing significant chemical changes to its bioactive components. The retention of characteristic QSO peaks in the nanoparticle chromatogram, as well as peaks corresponding to the blank FA-BSA carrier, confirms the coexistence of both QSO and BSA matrix components. Small changes in retention times are typically ascribed to intermolecular interactions between the encapsulated QSO and the protein matrix, which affect elution behavior while preserving structural integrity. These findings are in line with reports showing that chromatographic profiling is a dependable method to confirm encapsulation efficiency and formulation stability. Similar interpretations have been described in studies by Jithan et al. (2011).

The FA-QSO-BSA NPs exhibited an encapsulation efficiency of 37.61% and a drug loading efficiency of 19.26%. The encapsulation efficiency suggests favorable interactions between QSO and the BSA matrix, which may enhance drug entrapment and reduce drug loss during nanoparticle fabrication. Previous studies have reported that the physicochemical properties of BSA nanoparticles, including their multiple binding sites and affinity toward hydrophobic molecules, contribute to effective drug encapsulation and stability (Hemlata et al., 2025). Furthermore, adequate drug loading is important for improving therapeutic efficacy while minimizing carrier burden. Consistent with previous study by Tazhbayev et al. (2020) concluded that the loading efficiency of anticancer drug hydroxyurea was higher for the BSA-derived particles in comparison to the HSA-derived drug carrier.

In our study, the drug release characteristics of FA-QSO-BSA NPs have demonstrated a progressive and prolonged release pattern, illustrate efficient encapsulating of QSO inside the nanoparticle matrix. The pH of the physiological medium is the primary determinant of the active compound’s release from the NPs and necessary for long-term release in in vivo research. Lazer et al. (2022) found the similar results of increased drug release from FA-CS/ALG-PTX NPs (FA-conjugated chitosan-coated alginate nanoparticles) under basic circumstances.

FA-QSO-BSA NPs displayed concentration-dependent cytotoxicity and exhibited enhanced growth inhibition in breast cancer cell lines relative to free QSO and doxorubicin, whereas the blank NPs exhibited no cytotoxic effects, thereby confirming that the observed activity was due to QSO rather than the carrier system. This enhanced activity may be attributed to the combined effects of folic acid-mediated cellular uptake, improved intracellular delivery of QSO through the nanoparticle carrier, and the sustained release characteristics of the formulation. The nanoencapsulation strategy likely increased the uptake of QSO at the cellular level, thereby amplifying its antiproliferative effects. Consistent with previous reports by El Makawy et al. (2024a) and El makawy et al. (2024b), these findings support the development of QSO-based nano formulations as adjuvant therapies for breast cancer, with potential applications in chemoprevention, combination regimens, and toxicity reduction strategies. Significantly, FA-QSO-BSA NPs did not inhibit normal HEK293 cells, demonstrating selective cytotoxicity and possible safety benefits compared to traditional chemotherapeutics, which frequently lack tumor selectivity. Nosrati et al. (2018) documented the enhanced anticancer efficacy of the MCF-7 cell line when administered Chrysin-BSA NP in contrast to chrysin alone. Nosrati et al. (2018) further showed that BSA serves as an exceptional nanocarrier for delivering therapeutic medicines to the target region.

The therapeutic efficacy of drug-loaded nanoparticles is contingent upon their internalization and prolonged retention within cancer cells (Hattori and Maitani, 2004). Although in vitro and in vivo biological processes may differ significantly, an in vitro study may yield preliminary data demonstrating the benefits of nanoparticles (Zheng et al., 2010). FA-QSO-BSA NPs facilitated intracellular transport, as demonstrated by the increased uptake of FA-Rho-B-BSA NPs in the cytoplasm of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Consequently, our findings indicate the improved tumor cell targeting efficacy and cellular uptake of FA-QSO-BSA NPs via FA receptor-mediated endocytosis. Zhao et al. (2010) had reported similar results: the cellular uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled PTX-FA-BSANPs (paclitaxel-loaded FA-conjugated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles) was investigated to illustrate the internalization of the nanoparticles into cells and their targeting efficacy. After a 12-h incubation with PTX-FA-BSANPs, the cells exhibited near-saturation of fluorescence. The targeting of folate-decorated nanoparticles is both substantial and successful.

A primary rationale for utilizing a cytotoxic drug is its capacity to cause apoptosis and cell death in cancer cells, as apoptosis occurs without eliciting inflammatory reactions (Satchell et al., 2003). Mechanistically, Annexin-V FITC/PI analysis demonstrated a significant increase in early apoptosis (Annexin V+/PI−) in FA-QSO-BSA NP-treated cells relative to free QSO. Moreover, FA-QSO-BSA NPs elicited substantial G0/G1 phase arrest, inhibiting cell cycle progression and facilitating programmed cell death. Azizi et al. (2017) reported that albumin-coated copper nanoparticles induced apoptosis and G1 phase cell-cycle arrest in breast cancer cells, where albumin primarily served as a non-toxic carrier to enhance nanoparticle delivery. CFSE-based proliferation studies indicated decreased fluorescence intensity, signifying lower cell division subsequent to FA-QSO-BSA NP treatment. DAPI labeling validated apoptotic nuclear condensation and morphological changes in FA-QSO-BSA NP treated cells. The results demonstrated a considerable reduction in cell size and membrane blebbing, all of which suggested DNA condensation as examined under a confocal microscope (Prasannaraj and Venkatachalam, 2017). Although, imaging at different time point of intervals upon treatment with FA-QSO-BSA NPs would provide more comprehensive interpretation and recommend for future investigations. Similar results had been reported by Majeed et al. (2019). These findings suggest that encapsulation of QSO within FA-conjugated BSA nanoparticles enhance cellular uptake and increases anticancer effectiveness by inducing apoptosis and causing cell cycle arrest while preserving selectivity for cancer cells.

5 Conclusion

In this study, QSO was encapsulated within BSA-NPs conjugated with FA, resulting in FA-QSO-BSA NPs with 139.7 nm in size. Our results show that FA-QSO-BSA NPs have anticancer activity against the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines with lower toxicity to normal cells. The incorporation of QSO into folate-conjugated albumin nanoparticles improves its effectiveness and targeting towards breast cancer cells. In conclusion, FA-QSO-BSA NPs may serve as an effective method for the targeted delivery of QSO to tumors. Nonetheless, more studies and comprehensive analysis are necessary to elucidate the anti-cancer mechanism of the FA-QSO-BSA NPs and to validate their safety and efficacy in targeting breast cancer for human use. Moreover, additional research should be undertaken to assess its safety, alongside assuring it does not damage essential organs. In our subsequent research, we aimed to assess the in vivo behavior of FA-QSO-BSA NPs, including the circulation half-life of the nanoparticles, their distribution to the tumor site and other organs, the rate of QSO release in vivo, the stability of the nanoparticles in the bloodstream, their capacity to reach the target site, overall bioavailability, and elimination pathways.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnano.2026.1852250/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Salman Ahmad Mustfa, AstraZeneca, United Kingdom

Reviewed by: Noha Nafee, Kuwait University, Kuwait

Pharvendra Kumar, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, United States

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required for the studies on humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used.

Author contributions

SR: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. RG: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. ZS: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. NG: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. AV: Software, Writing – review and editing. JA: Software, Writing – review and editing. SW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi for its invaluable assistance and provision of the essential research facilities required to carry out the studies. The authors acknowledge the departmental grants by UGC-SAP DRS-I & II and DST-FIST to the Department of Biotechnology, SCLS, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, for infrastructure and research facilities development. The authors acknowledge financial support by the University Grant Commission, India by providing fellowship to Rupali Ghosh with NTA Ref. No.: 191620149658. Abul Vafa gratefully acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India, for awarding the ICMR Research Associateship (Reference No. 3/2/3/33/2022-NCD-III).

References

  1. Alpers D. H. (2016). Absorption and blood/cellular transport of folate and cobalamin: pharmacokinetic and physiological considerations. Biochimie 126, 52 – 56. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2015.11.006
  2. Al-Rahim A. M., AlChalabi R., Al-Saffar A. Z., Sulaiman G. M., Albukhaty S., Belali T. (2023). Folate-methotrexate loaded bovine serum albumin nanoparticles preparation: an in vitro drug targeting cytokines overwhelming expressed immune cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Anim. Biotechnol. 34 (2), 166 – 182. doi:10.1080/10495398.2021.1951282
  3. Angourani H. R., Heydari M., Yousefi A. R., Pashaei B., Mastinu A. (2022). Nanoparticles based-plant protein containing rosmarinus officinalis essential oil; fabrication, characterization, and evaluation. Appl. Sci. 12 (19), 9968. doi:10.3390/app12199968
  4. Azizi M., Ghourchian H., Yazdian F., Dashtestani F., AlizadehZeinabad H. (2017). Cytotoxic effect of albumin coated copper nanoparticle on human breast cancer cells of MDA-MB 231. PloS One 12 (11), e0188639. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188639
  5. Bachta P., Jakhmola V., Nainwal N., Joshi P., Bahuguna R., Chaudhary M. (2025). A comprehensive study on pH-sensitive nanoparticles for the efficient delivery of drugs. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Exp. Ther. 8 (2), 200. doi:10.5455/jabet.2025.17
  6. Ballicu A., Meloni G. M., Farci M., Tocco D., Piludu M., Parsons D. F. (2026). Mechanistic insights into protein Corona formation: the surface charge of mesoporous silica nanoparticles determines the orientation and the conformation of adsorbed BSA protein. Langmuir 42 (13), 9170 – 9182. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c06171
  7. Bray F., Laversanne M., Weiderpass E., Soerjomataram I. (2021). The ever‐increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 127 (16), 3029 – 3030. doi:10.1002/cncr.33587
  8. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., Soerjomataram I. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer Journal Clinicians 74 (3), 229 – 263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
  9. Calzoni E., Cesaretti A., Polchi A., Di Michele A., Tancini B., Emiliani C. (2019). Biocompatible polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery applications in cancer and neurodegenerative disorder therapies. J. Functional Biomaterials 10 (1), 4. doi:10.3390/jfb10010004
  10. Dai X., Cheng H., Bai Z., Li J. (2017). Breast cancer cell line classification and its relevance with breast tumor subtyping. J. Cancer 8 (16), 3131 – 3141. doi:10.7150/jca.18457
  11. El makawy A. I., Abdel-Aziem S. H., Mohammed S. E., Ibrahim F. M., Abd EL-Kader H. A., Sharaf H. A. (2024a). Exploration of tumor growth regression of quinoa and chia oil nanocapsules via the control of PIK3CA and MYC expression, anti-inflammation and cell proliferation inhibition, and their hepatorenal safety in rat breast cancer model. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre 48 (1), 7. doi:10.1186/s42269-023-01161-3
  12. El Makawy A. I., Mabrouk D. M., Ibrahim F. M., Abdel-Aziem S. H., EL-Kader H. A., Youssef D. A. (2024b). Formulation of quinoa oil-alginate loaded nanoemulsion and its anticancer efficacy as a therapy for chemically induced breast cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 51 (1), 705. doi:10.1007/s11033-024-09619-x
  13. Galisteo-González F., Molina-Bolívar J. A. (2014). Systematic study on the preparation of BSA nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 123, 286 – 292. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.028
  14. Ganesan K., Manivel A. (2018). Evaluation of anticancer activity of squalene isolated from Canthium coromandelicum leaves. World J. Pharm. Res. 7, 642 – 648.
  15. Gaur M., Maurya S., Akhtar M. S., Yadav A. B. (2023). Synthesis and evaluation of BSA-Loaded PLGA–Chitosan composite nanoparticles for the protein-based drug delivery system. ACS Omega 8 (21), 18751 – 18759. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c00738
  16. Ghosh R., Fatima N., Vafa A., Rizvi S. A., Wajid S. (2025). In-vitro assessment of anti-breast cancer potential of pumpkin seed oil nanoemulsion with mechanistic insights into cytotoxicity and apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 27815. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12532-3
  17. Greenwell M., Rahman P. K. (2015). Medicinal plants: their use in anticancer treatment. Int. Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences Research 6 (10), 4103 – 4112. doi:10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(10).4103-12
  18. Gupta R., Chen Y., Sarkar M., Xie H. (2022). Surfactant mediated accelerated and discriminatory in vitro drug release method for PLGA nanoparticles of poorly water-soluble drug. Pharmaceuticals 15 (12), 1489. doi:10.3390/ph15121489
  19. Hattori Y., Maitani Y. (2004). Enhanced in vitro DNA transfection efficiency by novel folate-linked nanoparticles in human prostate cancer and oral cancer. J. Controlled Release 97 (1), 173 – 183. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.03.007
  20. Heck R. T., Saldaña E., Lorenzo J. M., Correa L. P., Fagundes M. B., Cichoski A. J. (2019). Hydrogelled emulsion from chia and linseed oils: a promising strategy to produce low-fat burgers with a healthier lipid profile. Meat Sci. 156, 174 – 182. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.034
  21. Hemlata H. A., Murali N., Roy S., Betal S., Kumar S., Minocha S. (2025). Engineered BSA nanoparticles: synthesis, drug loading, and advanced characterization. Biol. Methods Protoc. 10 (1), bpaf066. doi:10.1093/biomethods/bpaf066
  22. Huang K., Ma H., Liu J., Huo S., Kumar A., Wei T. (2012). Size-dependent localization and penetration of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer cells, multicellular spheroids, and tumors in vivo. ACS Nano 6 (5), 4483 – 4493. doi:10.1021/nn301282m
  23. Ibrahim A. I., Sahyon H. A., Attia A. M., El-Shehawy A. A. (2025). Novel protocatechuic acid encapsulated bovine serum albumin functionalized folic acid nanoparticles for targeted therapy in urethane-induced lung cancer model. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 25793. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08465-6
  24. Jithan A. V., Madhavi K., Madhavi M., Prabhakar K. (2011). Preparation and characterization of albumin nanoparticles encapsulating curcumin intended for the treatment of breast cancer. Int. Journal Pharmaceutical Investigation 1 (2), 119 – 125. doi:10.4103/2230-973X.82432
  25. Kunjiappan S., Panneerselvam T., Prasad P., Sukumaran S., Somasundaram B., Sankaranarayanan M. (2018). Design, graph theoretical analysis and in silico modeling of Dunaliella bardawil biomass encapsulated keratin nanoparticles: a scaffold for effective glucose utilization. Biomed. Mater. 13 (4), 045012. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/aabcea
  26. Kunjiappan S., Theivendran P., Baskararaj S., Sankaranarayanan B., Palanisamy P., Saravanan G. (2019). Modeling a pH-sensitive zein-co-acrylic acid hybrid hydrogels loaded 5-fluorouracil and rutin for enhanced anticancer efficacy by oral delivery. Biotech. 9 (5), 185. doi:10.1007/s13205-019-1720-x
  27. Lazer L. M., Kesavan Y., Gor R., Ramachandran I., Pathak S., Narayan S. (2022). Targeting Colon cancer stem cells using novel doublecortin like kinase 1 antibody functionalized folic acid conjugated hesperetin encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 217, 112612. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112612
  28. Lira K. H., Passos T. S., Ramalho H. M., Rodrigues K. D., Vieira É. D., Cordeiro A. M. (2020). Whey protein isolate-gelatin nanoparticles enable the water-dispersibility and potentialize the antioxidant activity of quinoa oil (Chenopodium quinoa). PLoS One 15 (10), e0240889. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240889
  29. Liu F., Lan M., Ren B., Li L., Zou T., Kong Z. (2022). Baicalin-loaded folic acid-modified albumin nanoparticles (FA-BSANPs/BA) induce autophagy in MCF-7 cells via ROS-Mediated p38 MAPK and Akt/mTOR pathway. Cancer Nanotechnol. 13 (1), 2. doi:10.1186/s12645-021-00110-x
  30. Majeed S., Aripin F. H., Shoeb N. S., Danish M., Ibrahim M. M., Hashim R. (2019). Bioengineered silver nanoparticles capped with bovine serum albumin and its anticancer and apoptotic activity against breast, bone and intestinal Colon cancer cell lines. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 102, 254 – 263. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.041
  31. Marques B. L., Passos T. S., Dantas A. I., de Lima M. A., Moreira S. M., Rodrigues V. M. (2024). Nanoencapsulation of quinoa oil enhanced the antioxidant potential and inhibited digestive enzymes. Food Res. Int. 196, 115066. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115066
  32. Mirhadi E., Mashreghi M., Maleki M. F., Alavizadeh S. H., Arabi L., Badiee A. (2020). Redox-sensitive nanoscale drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Int. Journal Pharmaceutics 589, 119882. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119882
  33. Mizushina Y., Tanaka N., Yagi H., Kurosawa T., Onoue M., Seto H. (1996). Fatty acids selectively inhibit eukaryotic DNA polymerase activities in vitro. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Struct. Expr. 1308 (3), 256 – 262. doi:10.1016/0167-4781(96)00121-2
  34. Mohamed Ahmed I. A., Al Juhaimi F., Özcan M. M. (2021). Insights into the nutritional value and bioactive properties of quinoa (chenopodium quinoa): past, present and future prospective. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 56 (8), 3726 – 3741. doi:10.1111/ijfs.15011
  35. Mohamed D. A., Fouda K. A., Mohamed R. S. (2019). In vitro anticancer activity of quinoa and safflower seeds and their preventive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver. Pak. Journal Biological Sciences PJBS. 22 (8), 383 – 392. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2019.383.392
  36. Mufari J. R., Gorostegui H. A., Miranda‐Villa P. P., Bergesse A. E., Calandri E. L. (2020). Oxidative stability and characterization of quinoa oil extracted from wholemeal and germ flours. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 97 (1), 57 – 66. doi:10.1002/aocs.12308
  37. Nitta S. K., Numata K. (2013). Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences 14 (1), 1629 – 1654. doi:10.3390/ijms14011629
  38. Nosrati H., Abbasi R., Charmi J., Rakhshbahar A., Aliakbarzadeh F., Danafar H. (2018a). Folic acid conjugated bovine serum albumin: an efficient smart and tumor targeted biomacromolecule for inhibition folate receptor positive cancer cells. Int. Journal Biological Macromolecules 117, 1125 – 1132. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.026
  39. Nosrati H., Rakhshbahar A., Salehiabar M., Afroogh S., Manjili H. K., Danafar H. (2018b). Bovine serum albumin: an efficient biomacromolecule nanocarrier for improving the therapeutic efficacy of chrysin. J. Mol. Liq. 271, 639 – 646. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.06.066
  40. Park J. H., Lee Y. J., Kim Y. H., Yoon K. S. (2017). Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) seeds cultivated in Korea. Prev. Nutrition Food Science 22 (3), 195 – 202. doi:10.3746/pnf.2017.22.3.195
  41. Paśko P., Tyszka-Czochara M., Namieśnik J., Jastrzębski Z., Leontowicz H., Drzewiecki J. (2019). Cytotoxic, antioxidant and binding properties of polyphenols from the selected gluten-free pseudocereals and their by-products: in vitro model. J. Cereal Sci. 87, 325 – 333. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2019.04.009
  42. Patel K., Panchal N., Ingle P. (2019). Review of extraction techniques. Int. J. Adv. Res. Chem. Sci. 6 (3), 6 – 21.
  43. Prasannaraj G., Venkatachalam P. (2017). Green engineering of biomolecule-coated metallic silver nanoparticles and their potential cytotoxic activity against cancer cell lines. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 8 (2), 025001. doi:10.1088/2043-6254/aa6d2c
  44. Pulvento C., Bazile D. (2023). Worldwide evaluations of quinoa—Biodiversity and food security under climate change pressures: advances and perspectives. Plants 12 (4), 868. doi:10.3390/plants12040868
  45. Qi L., Guo Y., Luan J., Zhang D., Zhao Z., Luan Y. (2014). Folate-modified bexarotene-loaded bovine serum albumin nanoparticles as a promising tumor-targeting delivery system. J. Mater. Chem. B 2 (47), 8361 – 8371. doi:10.1039/c4tb01102c
  46. Sabourian P., Yazdani G., Ashraf S. S., Frounchi M., Mashayekhan S., Kiani S. (2020). Effect of physico-chemical properties of nanoparticles on their intracellular uptake. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences 21 (21), 8019. doi:10.3390/ijms21218019
  47. Sadeghzadeh F., Nasiraei Haghighi H., Ghiyamati M., Hajizadenadaf F., Homayouni Tabrizi M. (2023). In vitro and in vivo study on the anticancer effects of anethole-loaded bovine serum albumin nanoparticles surface decorated with chitosan and folic acid. Cancer Nanotechnol. 14 (1), 24. doi:10.1186/s12645-023-00181-y
  48. Satapathy S., Patro C. S., Patro G., Panda M., Patra A. (2023). Cancer therapy. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 14 (2).
  49. Satchell P. G., Gutmann J. L., Witherspoon D. E. (2003). Apoptosis: an introduction for the endodontist. Int. Endodontic Journal 36 (4), 237 – 245. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00657.x
  50. Shen Y., Zheng L., Peng Y., Zhu X., Liu F., Yang X. (2022). Physicochemical, antioxidant and anticancer characteristics of seed oil from three Chenopodium quinoa genotypes. Molecules 27 (8), 2453. doi:10.3390/molecules27082453
  51. Shrihastini V., Muthuramalingam P., Adarshan S., Sujitha M., Chen J. T., Shin H. (2021). Plant derived bioactive compounds, their anti-cancer effects and in silico approaches as an alternative target treatment strategy for breast cancer: an updated overview. Cancers 13 (24), 6222. doi:10.3390/cancers13246222
  52. Siwowska K., Schmid R. M., Cohrs S., Schibli R., Müller C. (2017). Folate receptor-positive gynecological cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Pharmaceuticals 10 (3), 72. doi:10.3390/ph10030072
  53. Smith T. J. (2000). Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent. Expert Opinion Investigational Drugs 9 (8), 1841 – 1848. doi:10.1517/13543784.9.8.1841
  54. Srivastava A., Prajapati A. (2020). Albumin and functionalized albumin nanoparticles: production strategies, characterization, and target indications. Asian Biomedicine Research, Reviews News 14 (6), 217 – 242. doi:10.1515/abm-2020-0032
  55. Tarhini M., Benlyamani I., Hamdani S., Agusti G., Fessi H., Greige-Gerges H. (2018). Protein-based nanoparticle preparation via nanoprecipitation method. Materials 11 (3), 394. doi:10.3390/ma11030394
  56. Tazhbayev Y., Mukashev O., Burkeyev M., Lozinsky V. I. (2020). Synthesis and comparative study of nanoparticles derived from bovine and human serum albumins. Polymers 12 (6), 1301. doi:10.3390/polym12061301
  57. Tseng C. L., Wu S. Y., Wang W. H., Peng C. L., Lin F. H., Lin C. C. (2008). Targeting efficiency and biodistribution of biotinylated-EGF-conjugated gelatin nanoparticles administered via aerosol delivery in nude mice with lung cancer. Biomaterials 29 (20), 3014 – 3022. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.033
  58. Ukwubile C. A., Ahmed A., Katsayal U. A., Ya'u J., Mejida S. J. (2019). GC–MS analysis of bioactive compounds from Melastomastrum capitatum (vahl) fern. Leaf methanol extract: an anticancer plant. Sci. Afr. 3, e00059. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00059
  59. Vagena I. A., Malapani C., Gatou M. A., Lagopati N., Pavlatou E. A. (2025). Enhancement of EPR effect for passive tumor targeting: current status and future perspectives. Appl. Sci. 15 (6), 3189. doi:10.3390/app15063189
  60. Watkins R., Wu L., Zhang C., Davis R. M., Xu B. (2015). Natural product-based nanomedicine: recent advances and issues. Int. Journal Nanomedicine 28, 6055 – 6074. doi:10.2147/IJN.S92162
  61. Xu L., Wang X., Xu M., Liu S. (2023). Single-particle hyperspectral imaging for monitoring of gold nanoparticle aggregates in macrophages. J. Phys. Chem. B 127 (14), 3231 – 3240. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c08289
  62. Yang R., An Y., Miao F., Li M., Liu P., Tang Q. (2014). Preparation of folic acid-conjugated, doxorubicin-loaded, magnetic bovine serum albumin nanospheres and their antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. Int. Journal Nanomedicine 4, 4231 – 4243. doi:10.2147/IJN.S67210
  63. Yu F. R., Lian X. Z., Guo H. Y., McGuire P. M., Li R. D., Wang R. (2005). Isolation and characterization of methyl esters and derivatives from Euphorbia kansui (euphorbiaceae) and their inhibitory effects on the human SGC-7901 cells. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 8 (3), 528 – 535.
  64. Zhang Y., Yang M., Portney N. G., Cui D., Budak G., Ozbay E. (2008). Zeta potential: a surface electrical characteristic to probe the interaction of nanoparticles with normal and cancer human breast epithelial cells. Biomed. Microdevices 10 (2), 321 – 328. doi:10.1007/s10544-007-9139-2
  65. Zhao D., Zhao X., Zu Y., Li J., Zhang Y., Jiang R. (2010). Preparation, characterization, and in vitro targeted delivery of folate-decorated paclitaxel-loaded bovine serum albumin nanoparticles. Int. Journal Nanomedicine 20, 669 – 677. doi:10.2147/ijn.s12918
  66. Zheng Y., Song X., Darby M., Liang Y., He L., Cai Z. (2010). Preparation and characterization of folate-poly (ethylene glycol)-grafted-trimethylchitosan for intracellular transport of protein through folate receptor-mediated endocytosis. J. Biotechnology 145 (1), 47 – 53. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.09.007

Citation

Rizvi, S. A. R., et al. (2026). Formulation and evaluation of quinoa seed oil loaded folic acid conjugated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for anti-breast cancer activity. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, Volume 8. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
8 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Rizvi, Ghosh, Siddiqui, Gupta, Vafa, Ahmad and Wajid.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Saima Wajid

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0