Skip to content

Perspective

Frontiers in Nanotechnology ·

Volume 8 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2026.1901345

Surface polarons in Fe-based spin-crossover complexes – a perspective

  • Alejandro Martínez Serra1
  • Archit Dhingra2*corresponding author
  1. 1Institut de Ciència dels Materials de la Universitat de València (ICMUV), University of Valencia, Carrer del Catedrátic José Beltrán Martinez, Valencia, Spain
  2. 2FinEstBeAMS, MAX IV-laboratoriet, Lund, Sweden
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Fe-based spin crossover (SCO) complexes are a highly versatile family of materials, especially for room-temperature device applications. In addition to their well-documented applications, this class of systems is now theorized to harbor both small and large polarons. Nevertheless, none of their promising applications can be truly realized until a solid understanding of their respective surfaces is obtained. In this Perspective, recent efforts (i) providing insights into the surface termination of some of the well-studied Fe-based SCO materials, and (ii) exploring the possibility of polaronic transport in these complexes, are discussed. Finally, the use of synchrotron-based vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation in order to detect the possible surface polarons in these systems is also proposed. The discussions contained herein are therefore expected to catalyze future investigations into the fabrication of room-temperature nanodevices that exploit polaronic transport in these complexes.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Scalable molecular transistor logic gates can potentially bypass the long-standing issue revolving around the cumbersome production of high-fidelity entangled states (Clauser et al., 1969; Clauser and Horne, 1974; Bennett, 1995; DiVincenzo, 1995) for use in quantum information and science (Dhingra et al., 2022a). One of the primary challenges in building such molecular transistors is finding the right kind of molecular spin systems that can offer bistability at–or in the vicinity of–room temperature, so that they can be used as channel materials in room-temperature spintronics (Dhingra et al., 2022a). This is exactly where Fe-based spin crossover (SCO) complexes jump into the fray: these systems have garnered great research attention owing to the well-documented room-temperature bistability of their spin states (Holovchenko et al., 2016; Soroceanu et al., 2019; Rubio-Giménez et al., 2020; Martínez Serra et al., 2023). As if their bistability was not lucrative enough, this class of materials is also projected to rely on both small and large polarons for charge transport (Soroceanu et al., 2019; Dhingra and Zaz, 2026). However, from the standpoint of both a solid fundamental understanding and reliable nanodevice fabrication, deciphering the surfaces of these Fe-based SCO materials is indispensable. In other words, since “the interface is the device” (EBSCOhost, 2012), any serious attempt at eventual commercialization of molecular transistors based on Fe-based SCO systems necessitates prior understanding of their respective surfaces.

In this Perspective, some recent efforts shedding light on the surface termination of these Fe-based SCO materials are discussed. The main goal of this article is to show the link between the nature of the surface termination of these systems and the potential existence of the much-coveted surface polarons in these fascinating materials. As far as verifying the presence of these quasiparticles is concerned, using synchrotron-based vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation is proposed as a viable route to detect their associated spectroscopic signatures (Vasiljevic et al., 2026).

Surfaces of Fe-based SCO complexes

A dearth of fundamental understanding of what truly is at the surface of a material of interest means that any sort of research endeavor targeted in the general direction of using that material for device fabrication or interface engineering is destined to be utterly futile. Therefore, this subsection shines light on the peculiarity of surfaces of Fe-based SCO materials by referring to research involving Fe-based SCO complexes with Fe(II) (Niel et al., 2001; Martínez et al., 2010; Zacher et al., 2011; Warner et al., 2013; Shvachko et al., 2016; Rohlf et al., 2018; Ekanayaka et al., 2022; Hao et al., 2022; Martínez Serra et al., 2023; Serra et al., 2023; Yazdani et al., 2023) and Fe(III) (Nihei et al., 2007; Li et al., 2010; Griffin et al., 2011; Siig and Kepp, 2018; Zaz et al., 2025b; 2025a) ions in octahedral ligand fields (as shown in Figure 1).

Based on the existing literature pertaining to the investigation of the surface termination of this class of materials, it is evident that ascertaining this is far from trivial (Shepherd et al., 2013; Zaz et al., 2025b). Nonetheless, in a recent study, Zaz et al. (Zaz et al., 2025b) resorted to X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and laboratory-based X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements (shown in Figure 2) to prove that the surface of their Fe(III) SCO salt [Fe(qsal) 2 Ni(dmit) 2 ], where qsal = N(8quinolyl)salicylaldimine, and dmit 2− = 1,3-dithiol-2-thione-4,5-dithiolato, preferentially terminates in the Ni(dmit) 2 moiety. This fundamental discovery is expected to have significant implications for the fabrication of nanodevices based on this material, as the atomic species lying at the surface strongly influence the surface magnetochemistry (Ballav et al., 2013). Given the lack of full transparency regarding the surface termination of this family of materials until the dissemination of Zaz’s pioneering investigation (Zaz et al., 2025b), it merits well-deserved praise.

Detecting surface polarons

Fe-based SCO materials are not only bistable at room temperature, but they also have the added advantage that charge transport in those containing Fe(II) ions is understood to be dictated by polarons (Soroceanu et al., 2019; Dhingra and Zaz, 2026). What makes these materials truly intriguing in this aspect is the fact that–depending on the specific values of the on-site Hubbard interaction and the strength of the ligand-to-metal charge transfer–they are capable of hosting both small and large polarons (Dhingra and Zaz, 2026). However, as things stand, all we have at our disposal is an approximate three-term Fröhlich Hamiltonian that describes large polarons in these materials. This rough Hamiltonian can be spelled out as follows (Fröhlich, 1954)

As described elsewhere (Dhingra and Zaz, 2026), the momentum of an electron of mass m is described by the momentum operator p ^ e, the momentum of phonons is denoted by k, their dispersion is denoted by ω k, and the strength of the interaction between electrons and phonons is given by V k. The specific forms of these functions are dictated by the system of interest (Grusdt et al., 2017; Houtput and Tempere, 2021). The creation and annihilation operators associated with a phonon of wave number k are given by b ^ k † and b ^ k, respectively.

Therefore, if the theoretical speculations surrounding the presence of polarons in these systems are experimentally validated, this could represent a significant breakthrough in the field of molecular spintronics, as it would position the Fe-based SCO materials as promising candidates for room-temperature applications in quantum information and science, offering enhanced functionalities.

2. Discussion

The surfaces of the Fe-based SCO complexes containing Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions in octahedral ligand fields are clearly understudied. Therefore, what Zaz et al. have shown in their recent study is quite praiseworthy. Nevertheless, much more work is needed to unravel the surface termination of these complexes with easily switchable spin states. In light of this, we suggest two possible routes to decipher the surface termination of these materials in a non-disruptive fashion: (i) angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS), where the photoemission take-off angle is changed to alter the sample probing depth (Dhingra et al., 2020; 2021b; 2021a; 2022b; 2023; Di Bernardo, 2021); and (ii) photon-energy dependent high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HRXPS). The former, i.e., ARXPS, can easily be performed using a standard X-ray Al K α (or Mg K α) anode in any laboratory. In contrast, the latter, i.e., photon-energy-dependent HRXPS, necessitates the use of a synchrotron facility.

Since even the standalone applications of polaronic transport are numerous (Bredas and Street, 1985; Sarkar et al., 2019; Santucci et al., 2025; Tinti et al., 2025), if their presence in these materials is experimentally confirmed, they could enhance the already well-established versatility of Fe-based SCO systems and raise it to another level. Now that photoemission spectroscopy has been shown to be one of the reliable methods for the experimental observation of polarons in condensed matter (Kestler et al., 2026; Vasiljevic et al., 2026), we recommend using synchrotron-based VUV radiation to investigate the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), also known as the valence band edge, of these materials for the experimental detection of polarons at the surfaces of these complexes. Any changes in the intensities of the HOMO band and the work function of the system will manifest as variations in the photoelectron yield and the position of the secondary electron cutoff on the kinetic energy scale, respectively. As a side note, while it would be interesting to discuss the physical significance of these changes to the observed photoemission spectra in the vicinity of the Fermi level (E F), due to the strict word limit for Perspective articles appearing in this journal, we would like to direct the curiosity of readers to Figure 4 of (Vasiljevic et al., 2026). If spectroscopic signatures pertaining to the existence of polarons in these materials are observed, then temperature-dependent electrical transport, optical spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy measurements could eventually be used to cross-validate the photoemission spectroscopy data. This Perspective, thus, acts as a catalyst intending to push the frontiers of research into the surfaces of this class of materials for applications in room-temperature molecular spintronics.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

AS: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Validation. AD: Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization, Validation, Methodology, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Resources, Writing – original draft.

Acknowledgements

The idea disseminated via this Perspective stems from the data collected at the MaxPEEM beamline at the MAX IV Laboratory. Therefore, we would like to acknowledge the MAX IV Laboratory for the beamtime on the MaxPEEM beamline under proposal 20261147. Research conducted at MAX IV, a Swedish national user facility, is supported by the Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council, VR) under contract 2018–07152, Vinnova (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) under contract 2018–04969, and Formas under contract 2019–02496.

References

  1. Ballav N., Wäckerlin C., Siewert D., Oppeneer P. M., Jung T. A. (2013). Emergence of On-Surface magnetochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 2303 – 2311. doi:10.1021/jz400984k
  2. Bennett C. H. (1995). Quantum information and computation. Phys. Today 48, 24 – 30. doi:10.1063/1.881452
  3. Bredas J. L., Street G. B. (1985). Polarons, bipolarons, and solitons in conducting polymers. Acc. Chem. Res. 18, 309 – 315. doi:10.1021/ar00118a005
  4. Clauser J. F., Horne M. A. (1974). Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys. Rev. D. 10, 526 – 535. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526
  5. Clauser J. F., Horne M. A., Shimony A., Holt R. A. (1969). Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 – 884. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
  6. Dhingra A., Zaz M. Z. (2026). On the origins of charge transport in spin crossover complexes. Eur. Phys. J. B 99, 32. doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-026-01146-x
  7. Dhingra A., Galiy P. V., Wang L., Vorobeva N. S., Lipatov A., Torres A. (2020). Surface termination and Schottky-barrier formation of in 4 Se 3 (001). Semicond. Sci. Technol. 35, 065009. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/ab7e45
  8. Dhingra A., Lipatov A., Sinitskii A., Dowben P. A. (2021a). Complexities at the Au/ZrS3(001) interface probed by x-ray photoemission spectroscopy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 434001. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac16f8
  9. Dhingra A., Sando D., Lu P.-S., Marzouk Z. G., Nagarajan V., Dowben P. A. (2021b). X-ray photoemission studies of BiInO3: surface termination and effective debye temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 025304. doi:10.1063/5.0057556
  10. Dhingra A., Hu X., Borunda M. F., Johnson J. F., Binek C., Bird J. (2022a). Molecular transistors as substitutes for quantum information applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 441501. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac8c11
  11. Dhingra A., Lipatov A., Lu H., Chagoya K., Dalton J., Gruverman A. (2022b). Surface and dynamical properties of GeI 2. 2d Mater. 9, 025001. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac4715
  12. Dhingra A., Nikonov D. E., Lipatov A., Sinitskii A., Dowben P. A. (2023). What happens when transition metal trichalcogenides are interfaced with gold? J. Mater. Res. 38, 52 – 68. doi:10.1557/s43578-022-00744-6
  13. Di Bernardo I. (2021). Non-disruptive techniques for depth profiling in photoemission spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 459. doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00331-4
  14. DiVincenzo D. P. (1995). Quantum computation. Science 270, 255 – 261. doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.270.5234.255
  15. EBSCOhost (2012). The interface is still the device. Nat. Mater. 11 (2), 91. doi:10.1038/nmat3244
  16. Ekanayaka T. K., Kurz H., McElveen K. A., Hao G., Mishra E., N’Diaye A. T. (2022). Evidence for surface effects on the intermolecular interactions in Fe(ii) spin crossover coordination polymers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 883 – 894. doi:10.1039/D1CP04243B
  17. Fröhlich H. (1954). Electrons in lattice fields. Adv. Phys. 3, 325 – 361. doi:10.1080/00018735400101213
  18. Griffin M., Shakespeare S., Shepherd H. J., Harding C. J., Létard J., Desplanches C. (2011). A symmetry‐breaking spin‐state transition in Iron(III). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 896 – 900. doi:10.1002/anie.201005545
  19. Grusdt F., Schmidt R., Shchadilova Y. E., Demler E. (2017). Strong-coupling bose polarons in a bose-einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. A Coll. Park 96, 013607. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.013607
  20. Hao G., Dale A. S., N’Diaye A. T., Chopdekar R. V., Koch R. J., Jiang X. (2022). Intermolecular interaction and cooperativity in an Fe(II) spin crossover molecular thin film system. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 295201. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac6cbc
  21. Holovchenko A., Dugay J., Giménez‐Marqués M., Torres‐Cavanillas R., Coronado E., van der Zant H. S. J. (2016). Near room‐temperature memory devices based on hybrid spin‐crossover @SiO 2 nanoparticles coupled to single‐layer graphene nanoelectrodes. Adv. Mater. 28, 7228 – 7233. doi:10.1002/adma.201600890
  22. Houtput M., Tempere J. (2021). Beyond the Fröhlich Hamiltonian: path-integral treatment of large polarons in anharmonic solids. Phys. Rev. B 103, 184306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184306
  23. Kestler M. F., Woo K. C., Lim J. W. X., Prins L. M., Feldmann J., Loh Z.-H. (2026). Direct observation of Fröhlich polaron formation in BiOI nanoplatelets. Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, L022401. doi:10.1103/wcq2-gpmz
  24. Li B., Wei R.-J., Tao J., Huang R.-B., Zheng L.-S., Zheng Z. (2010). Solvent-induced transformation of single crystals of a spin-crossover (SCO) compound to single crystals with two distinct SCO centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1558 – 1566. doi:10.1021/ja909695f
  25. Martínez V., Boldog I., Gaspar A. B., Ksenofontov V., Bhattacharjee A., Gütlich P. (2010). Spin crossover phenomenon in nanocrystals and nanoparticles of [Fe(3-Fpy) 2 M(CN)4] (M II = Ni, Pd, Pt) two-dimensional coordination polymers. Chem. Mater. 22, 4271 – 4281. doi:10.1021/cm101022u
  26. Martínez Serra A., Dhingra A., Asensio M. C., Real J. A., Francisco Sánchez Royo J. (2023). Is the surface of Hofmann-like spin-crossover {Fe(pz)[Pt(CN) 4 ]} the same as its bulk? Dalton Trans. 52, 10305 – 10309. doi:10.1039/D3DT01955A
  27. Niel V., Martinez-Agudo J. M., Muñoz M. C., Gaspar A. B., Real J. A. (2001). Cooperative spin crossover behavior in cyanide-bridged Fe(II)−M(II) Bimetallic 3D hofmann-like networks (M = Ni, Pd, and Pt). Inorg. Chem. 40, 3838 – 3839. doi:10.1021/ic010259y
  28. Nihei M., Shiga T., Maeda Y., Oshio H. (2007). Spin crossover iron(III) complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 251, 2606 – 2621. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.007
  29. Rohlf S., Gruber M., Flöser B. M., Grunwald J., Jarausch S., Diekmann F. (2018). Light-induced spin crossover in an Fe(II) low-spin complex enabled by surface adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1491 – 1496. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00338
  30. Rubio-Giménez V., Tatay S., Martí-Gastaldo C. (2020). Electrical conductivity and magnetic bistability in metal–organic frameworks and coordination polymers: charge transport and spin crossover at the nanoscale. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 5601 – 5638. doi:10.1039/C9CS00594C
  31. Santucci S., Vasiljevic M., Zhang H., Tinti V. B., Bergne A., Morin-Martinez A. A. (2025). Enhanced non-classical electrostriction in strained tetragonal ceria. Nat. Commun. 16, 36. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55393-6
  32. Sarkar S., Goswami S., Trushin M., Saha S., Panahandeh‐Fard M., Prakash S. (2019). Polaronic trions at the MoS 2 /SrTiO 3 interface. Adv. Mater. 31, e1903569. doi:10.1002/adma.201903569
  33. Serra A. M., Dhingra A., Asensio M. C., Real J. A., Royo J. F. S. (2023). Surface stabilisation of the high-spin state of Fe(ii) spin-crossover complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 14736 – 14741. doi:10.1039/D3CP00863K
  34. Shepherd H. J., Molnár G., Nicolazzi W., Salmon L., Bousseksou A. (2013). Spin crossover at the nanometre scale. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 653 – 661. doi:10.1002/ejic.201201205
  35. Shvachko Y. N., Starichenko D. V., Korolyov A. V., Yagubskii E. B., Kotov A. I., Buravov L. I. (2016). The conducting spin-crossover compound combining Fe(II) cation complex with TCNQ in a fractional reduction state. Inorg. Chem. 55, 9121 – 9130. doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01829
  36. Siig O. S., Kepp K. P. (2018). Iron(II) and Iron(III) spin crossover: toward an optimal density functional. J. Phys. Chem. A 122, 4208 – 4217. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.8b02027
  37. Soroceanu I., Graur A., Coca E., Salmon L., Molnar G., Demont P. (2019). Broad-band dielectric spectroscopy reveals peak values of conductivity and permittivity switching upon spin crossover. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7391 – 7396. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02678
  38. Tinti V. B., Vasiljevic M., Grønborg M., Chen H., Frederiksen V., Kantor I. (2025). Electromechanical coupling in polaronic ceria. J. Phys. Energy 7, 035002. doi:10.1088/2515-7655/adc628
  39. Vasiljevic M., Buratto Tinti V., Zamudio‐García J., Castillo Robles J. M., Bilalis V., Asghar I. (2026). Hole polaronic confinement in (111) yttria‐stabilised zirconia. Small 22, e13940. doi:10.1002/smll.202513940
  40. Warner B., Oberg J. C., Gill T. G., El Hallak F., Hirjibehedin C. F., Serri M. (2013). Temperature- and light-induced spin crossover observed by X-ray spectroscopy on isolated Fe(II) complexes on gold. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1546 – 1552. doi:10.1021/jz4005619
  41. Yazdani S., Collier K., Yang G., Phillips J., Dale A., Mosey A. (2023). Optical characterization of isothermal spin state switching in an Fe(II) spin crossover molecular and polymer ferroelectric bilayer. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35, 365401. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/acd7ba
  42. Zacher D., Schmid R., Wöll C., Fischer R. A. (2011). Surface chemistry of metal–organic frameworks at the liquid–solid interface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 176 – 199. doi:10.1002/anie.201002451
  43. Zaz M. Z., Chin W. K., Viswan G., Subedi A., Mishra E., McElveen K. A. (2025a). Chiral effects at the metal center in Fe(III) spin crossover coordination salts. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 10LT01. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ada338
  44. Zaz M. Z., Tamang B., McElveen K., Mishra E., Viswan G., Chin W. K. (2025b). The surface termination of a Fe (III) spin crossover molecular salt. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 135001. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/adaff9

Citation

Serra, A. M. & Dhingra, A. (2026). Surface polarons in Fe-based spin-crossover complexes – a perspective. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, Volume 8. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
8 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Serra and Dhingra.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Archit Dhingra

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0