Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience ·

Volume 20 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1862945

Inhibited oligodendrogenesis impairs attention and motivation in adult mice regardless of repeated mild traumatic brain injury

  • Lisa M. Gazdzinski1
  • Jordan Mak1,2
  • Miranda Mellerup1,2
  • Paul John Fletcher3,4
  • Anne L. Wheeler1,2*corresponding author
  1. 1Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
  2. 2Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  3. 3Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  4. 4Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The brain’s white matter is responsible for communication across the brain and because attention relies on coordinated communication among distributed brain networks, white matter dysfunction may contribute to attentional impairment. Attention problems are among the most common long-lasting cognitive symptoms of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and as attention is fundamental to many aspects of cognition, the effects of attentional impairment can be broad. mTBI-induced effects on oligodendrocytes and myelin contribute to cognitive deficits following injury and myelin plasticity is a potential mechanism for functional recovery. The aims of this work were to investigate the effects of mTBI and inhibition of oligodendrogenesis on attention in mice, and evaluate the contribution of newly generated oligodendrocytes to behavioral recovery following injury. This study used the Myrf conditional knockout mouse model, in which the Myrf gene, required for oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) differentiation into mature myelinating oligodendrocytes, is deleted from OPCs following tamoxifen injection, thereby halting oligodendrogenesis. Mice were trained on the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time (5-CSRT) task before receiving tamoxifen followed by three mTBI or sham procedures. Attention was probed on the 5-CSRT task with decreasing stimulus duration at four timepoints following injury out to 12 weeks. While no mTBI-induced attentional impairment was observed, OPC-MyrfKO mice showed lower accuracy (β = −4.26%, p Bonf = 0.003) across injury groups, timepoints and stimulus durations, and fewer premature trials at the later timepoints (genotype-by-timepoint interaction p Bonf = 0.03; β = −4.8%, p = 0.017 at 8 weeks and β = −5.19%, p = 0.027 at 12 weeks), suggesting that active oligodendrogenesis is required for sustained attention and task engagement. These results suggest that myelin plasticity in adulthood may contribute to attention and complex task performance. The mouse model of mTBI used did not impact attention as measured by the 5-CSRT task, thus further research is required to elucidate the role of oligodendrogenesis in post-mTBI cognitive recovery.

Keywords

1. Introduction

White matter, comprised of bundles of axons, forms the structural connectivity that enables communication across the brain. Complex cognitive functions, such as learning, attention, executive function, memory, and language, rely on the coordination of distributed neural networks, which depend on the structural integrity and plasticity of the associated white matter (Filley and Fields, 2016). Multiple large-scale functional brain networks have been associated with various aspects of attention, and altered connectivity within these networks has been associated with a variety of pathology conditions, including brain injury (Han et al., 2016; Posner et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2025).

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), also often called concussion, is a condition in which white matter damage is likely to contribute to cognitive symptoms, which may include attentional impairment. mTBI is very common, with an estimated 1 in 4 people being affected in their lifetime (Daugherty et al., 2020). Repeated injuries are common, particularly among contact sport athletes (Glaser et al., 2024; Yates et al., 2025) and in people who experience intimate partner violence (Smirl et al., 2019). While most recover fully within a few days to a couple of weeks, a significant proportion (∼30%) of people experience prolonged symptoms that can last months or years after the injury (Cancelliere et al., 2023). A recent systematic review listed impaired attention among the most common cognitive deficits following concussion from the acute through the chronic period (Collins et al., 2023). Attention deficits have also been reported in pre-clinical TBI models. Impaired performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) task has been observed in juvenile and adult rats following repeated mTBI (Mychasiuk et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2021; Vonder Haar et al., 2022), and a transient post-mTBI deficit has been reported in mice in the object-based attention test (Zhang et al., 2021) and in the Y-maze spontaneous alternation task (Gazdzinski et al., 2020), which is considered a test of working memory, but also requires attentional processes for performance. As attention is fundamental to many other aspects of cognition, attentional impairment can impact many domains of daily functioning for people after mTBI, thus therapeutic targets are needed.

White matter is particularly vulnerable to damage from TBI (Armstrong et al., 2016). Axons may be directly damaged by stretching and shearing forces imparted on them by the acceleration and deceleration of the head during the injuring event itself (Johnson et al., 2013), but if the injury is mild, it does not necessarily lead to axonal loss and cell death. Instead, mild trauma can result in damaged axons dispersed among intact ones within major white matter tracts (Povlishock, 1993; Sullivan et al., 2013). Many large caliber axons are surrounded by myelin sheaths. Myelin is formed from multiple layers of extended cell membrane from oligodendrocytes, with a single oligodendrocyte contributing myelin to several axons. In the damaged white matter environment that results from mTBI, oxidative stress, glutamate excitotoxicity, and inflammation can lead to loss of oligodendrocytes, demyelination of intact axons, and changes to myelin structure (Lotocki et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2016). Given myelin’s role in supporting and tuning neural circuit function, myelin damage may be a significant factor underlying the cognitive impairments following mTBI (Mierzwa et al., 2015). Fortunately, evidence for myelin plasticity and repair after mTBI has been found in both human imaging studies, which have shown evolution and in some cases normalization of myelin water fraction and diffusion MRI measures over time (Weber et al., 2018; Lindsey et al., 2023), and in animal models of mTBI, in which increased oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) proliferation and evidence of remyelination have been reported (Sullivan et al., 2013; Mierzwa et al., 2015; Nonaka et al., 2021). Thus, myelin plasticity is a potential mechanism for functional recovery from mTBI and understanding its role is important for assessing it as a therapeutic target.

The objectives of the current study were to determine how repeated mTBI and inhibition of oligodendrogenesis influence attention, and to test whether adult-born oligodendrocytes contribute to behavioral recovery following injury. The study was conducted in Myrf conditional knockout (Myrf-cKO) mice, in which the myelin regulatory factor (Myrf) gene, a transcription factor required for OPC differentiation into myelin producing oligodendrocytes, is deleted from OPCs in a time-controlled manner via tamoxifen administration (McKenzie et al., 2014; Duncan et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2020; Steadman et al., 2020; He et al., 2024; Xin et al., 2024; Gazdzinski et al., 2025). Mice were trained on the 5-CSRT task, a pre-clinical adaptation of the continuous performance test commonly used to assess attention in humans (Mar et al., 2013; Fizet et al., 2016). After training, oligodendrogenesis was halted in Cre+ Myrf-cKO mice (OPC-MyrfKO) before the mice underwent repeated mTBI or sham procedures. Attention was assessed by decreasing the stimulus duration on the 5-CSRT task at four timepoints: 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-mTBI. While attentional impairment was not observed following mTBI in this study, mice with disrupted oligodendrogenesis had lower accuracy, omitted more trials, and were slower to collect the reward across injury groups, stimulus durations and timepoints compared to Cre− controls (OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL), suggesting that active myelination is required for sustained attention and engagement in the task.

2. Materials and methods

Mice

All animal procedures were approved by The Centre for Phenogenomics animal care committee. Myrf-cKO mice were generated by first crossing Myrf flox / flox mice (The Jackson Laboratory #01067, in-house colony) with NG2-CreER ™ mice (The Jackson Laboratory #8538, in-house colony) to generate Myrf flox /+:NG2-CreER ™ mice, which were backcrossed with Myrf flox / flox mice to yield mice that were homozygous for the floxed Myrf allele (Myrf flox / flox) and either hemizygous (Cre+) or non-carrier (Cre−) for the NG2-CreER ™ gene. Approximately equal numbers of male and female mice of each Cre genotype were included in each injury group (N = 76; 18–20/genotype/injury group; detailed group sizes are shown in Table 1), and mice were housed in sex-separated cages in groups of 2–5. Pre-training began when mice were 8–11 weeks old. Training and testing were performed during the latter half of the light phase of the 12-h light/dark cycle (ZT6-ZT12). A study timeline is shown in Figure 1.

Tamoxifen administration

Tamoxifen (T5648 Sigma-Aldrich, 180 mg/kg dissolved at 30 mg/ml in 10% ethanol in sunflower seed oil (Sigma-Aldrich, Canada)), as used previously (Akers et al., 2014; Steadman et al., 2020; Gazdzinski et al., 2025), was administered to all mice via daily intraperitoneal injections for 3 days, which activated Cre recombinase in Cre+ mice, thereby deleting the Myrf gene in NG2-expressing cells in these mice (OPC-MyrfKO) and halting oligodendrogenesis. Cre− mice served as controls (OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL) with intact oligodendrogenesis. The mice were given supplemental food (DietGel 76A, Clear H2O, USA) beginning immediately after the final task session before tamoxifen and until 24 h after the last tamoxifen injection to decrease morbidity associated with the drug.

-Choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) task

Mice were trained in 16 Bussey-Saksida touchscreen operant chambers (Campden Instruments, USA) following the protocol described below, adapted from the protocols described by Horner et al. (2013) and Mar et al. (2013) and with guidance from the Touchscreen Cognition website. 1 One wall of the chamber consisted of a touchscreen on which an illuminated square stimulus was presented in one of five locations. The opposite wall of the chamber contained a reward port, in which strawberry milkshake (Neilson, Canada) was delivered following a correct response. Photographs and a graphical representation of the system and task are published in Mar et al. (2013). Data from one of the chambers (3 mice) was excluded from all analysis because there was an intermittent malfunction, making the data from this chamber unreliable.

Food restriction

The mice were food-restricted beginning at 6–9 weeks of age and for the duration of the study to maintain a target weight of 80%–85% of their free-feeding weight. If food restriction began prior to 8 weeks of age, the target weight was increased by 1 g/week to account for developmental growth. Habituation and training began after 1–2 weeks of food restriction.

Habituation and pre-training

The mice were habituated to the chambers and the milkshake over 2 days and then progressed through several stages of pre-training over the following 2–4 weeks in which they learned to associate touching the stimulus with the delivery of milkshake reward. Details about the stages are provided in the Supplementary material.

Task-specific training

For this stage of the training, mice were required to initiate each trial by poking their head into the reward port, after which there was a 5-s delay before a stimulus would be presented on the screen. The mice were required to touch the stimulus window either while it was illuminated or during the 5-s limited hold period that followed to receive rewards. An incorrect response, an omitted trial, or a touch during the 5 s before stimulus presentation (premature touch), would end the trial and trigger the chamber light to come on and a buzzer to sound for 5 s. The stimulus duration was progressively reduced from 8 s to 4 s to 2 s. Mice were required to complete 40 correct trials within 60 min with an accuracy (# correct/(# correct + # incorrect + # omitted) × 100%) of at least 70% and fewer than 20% omitted trials on 3 out of 4 consecutive days to progress to the next stimulus duration. This stage of training lasted on average 5–6 weeks with the mice being trained 6 days/week. Mice that completed training earlier than others in their cohort were given weekly reminder sessions with the 2-s stimulus duration.

Testing

At 8 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after the first mTBI procedure, the mice were tested on the task with stimulus durations of 0.8 s, 0.4 s, and 0.2 s. Prior to each of these probe trial series, the mice had three rebaselining sessions with the 2-s stimulus duration. Single rebaselining sessions were also done between each of the probe trials. Weekly reminder sessions with the 2-s stimulus duration were done between post-mTBI timepoints.

Measures

The number of correct, incorrect, omitted and premature trials were counted and from this, accuracy (# correct/(# correct + # incorrect + # omitted) × 100%), choice accuracy (# correct/(# correct + incorrect) × 100%), % omitted trials and % premature trials were calculated. Correct response, incorrect response, and reward collection latencies were also recorded.

Repeated mild TBI

Following tamoxifen administration, the mice remained in their home cage for 2 days and then performed three rebaselining sessions with the 2-s stimulus duration. The average accuracy from these three sessions was considered when assigning the mice to the mTBI or sham groups such that the injury groups were balanced for task performance as well as genotype (Cre status) and sex. The mice were then subjected to three mTBI or sham procedures spaced 24 h apart. Under isoflurane anesthesia (4% for induction; 1%–2% for maintenance), the fur on the scalp was removed using depilatory cream (Nair, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., USA) and the mouse was positioned in a stereotaxic frame (Stoelting Co., USA) using zygomatic arch cuffs. An electromagnetic controlled cortical impact device (Impact One, Leica Biosystems, USA) was used to deliver an impact to the intact scalp centered at bregma with a 5-mm metal tip to a depth of 1.2 mm at a velocity of 2 m/s and with a dwell time of 0.2 s. Following the impact, the mouse was allowed to breathe oxygen for 1 min and was then transferred to a warm cage to recover from anesthesia before being returned to its home cage. Subcutaneous saline, as well as bupivacaine (0.125%) and xylocaine (0.1%) under the scalp, were administered before each procedure to maintain hydration and provide local analgesia, respectively, and sustained-release buprenorphine (1.2 mg/kg) was provided before the first and third procedures to provide systemic analgesia. The mice were given supplemental food following each mTBI procedure, as during tamoxifen administration.

Mild TBI and Myrf-cKO model validation

Neurosilver staining and quantification

To confirm the presence of white matter damage following mTBI, axonal degeneration was visualized using the FD Neurosilver Kit II (FD Neurotechnologies Inc.). Briefly, 12 days after the final probe trial session, a subset of mice (N = 1/sex/genotype/injury group) were fixed via transcardial perfusion with heparinized phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. The brains were left in the skulls and post-fixed overnight in 4% PFA before being transferred to PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide for storage at 4°C until further processing. In preparation for staining, the brains were dissected, cryoprotected in 15% sucrose for 1 day followed by 2 days in 30% sucrose in PBS before being cryosectioned at 40 μm into PBS-containing wells. Neurosilver staining was performed following the protocol provided with the kit.

Microscopy images of Neurosilver-stained sections of the corpus callosum at the midline (∼1.8 mm posterior to bregma) were acquired at 20× magnification on a Nikon Eclipse Ni-U microscope (1 image/sample). Staining quantification was performed using Fiji (ImageJ2 2.16.0/1.54n) (Schneider et al., 2012). The images were converted to 8-bit grayscale and background subtraction was performed using the sliding paraboloid method with a rolling ball radius of 10 pixels and a threshold defining positive stain was obtained using the Triangle method on each image. The area fraction of positive stain was measured in manually drawn ROIs of the corpus callosum.

Electron microscopy

Corpus callosum samples were prepared for electron microscopy (EM), as described in detail previously (Gazdzinski et al., 2025), to characterize the effect of OPC-MyrfKO on white matter. Briefly, a subset of mice (N = 2/sex/genotype/injury group) were perfusion-fixed similarly to those prepared for histological staining, except that the fixative consisted of 2% PFA and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (EM fixative). The brains were dissected from the skulls immediately following the perfusion procedure and stored in 1% glutaraldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer until being prepared for imaging. Corpus callosum samples were dissected (∼1 mm × 1 mm × 2 mm, approximately at bregma), post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, washed with propylene oxide and embedded in Quetol-Spurr resin. Blocks were cured overnight in a 60°C oven. Ultra-thin sections were cut on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome, post-stained with 2% uranyl acetate and 3% lead citrate and then air dried at room temperature before viewing under EM. EM images (6–9 per sample) were acquired at 8000× magnification on a Hitachi HT7800 TEM, operated at 80 keV using a EMSIS Xarosa 20 MP CMOS camera. Myelinated axons were automatically segmented and counted on the EM images using AxonDeepSeg, as described previously (Zaimi et al., 2018; Gazdzinski et al., 2025).

Statistical analyses

Group comparisons in each of the 5-CSRT measures were made in the probe trial data (0.8 s, 0.4 s, and 0.2 s stimulus durations) using linear mixed effects models that included covariates for injury group, genotype, sex, stimulus duration, pre-mTBI performance, and timepoint post-mTBI, and random intercepts for mouse and cohort to account for repeated testing and correlations among mice tested together. The Satterthwaite approximation was used to estimate degrees of freedom for fixed effects. Interaction terms to test for injury group and genotype effects on change in measures over time (injury group × genotype × time; injury group × time; genotype × time) were also included in the models but only retained if the interaction term was significant at p < 0.05. Bonferroni correction was applied across the two primary performance measures reported (accuracy and premature touches) and separately across the three latency measures. Where a significant main effect or interaction was observed, separate linear models were run at each of the timepoints.

Similarly, group comparisons in myelinated axon density measured from EM images were made using a linear mixed effects model that included covariates for injury group, genotype, and sex, and random intercepts for mouse to account for correlations among images from the same animal. Group comparisons in the Neurosilver-stained area fraction in the corpus callosum were made using a linear model that included covariates for injury group, genotype, and sex. Statistical analyses were performed in R (4.4.0; RStudio 2024.09.1+394 for macOS) (R Core Team, 2022).

3. Results

Mild TBI and Myrf-cKO model validation

Confirming the occurrence of head impact, mTBI mice experienced a short period of apnea immediately post-impact (apnea duration following the first mTBI: mean = 8.7 s, SD = 8.2 s; data available in a subset of 26 mice) whereas all sham mice experienced no apnea. Evidence of axonal degeneration was observed in the corpus callosum of mTBI mice at ∼14 weeks post-injury (β = 4.32%, p = 0.041, Supplementary Figure 1), confirming persistent mTBI damage in a structure involved in complex cognitive function, including attention (Banich, 1998; Brown et al., 2020).

As expected, OPC-MyrfKO resulted in a lower density of myelinated axons in the corpus callosum of OPC-MyrfKO mice compared to OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice at 14 weeks post-tamoxifen administration (β = −0.098 axons/μm 2, p = 0.038, Supplementary Figure 2). This aligns with previously published evidence that the OPC-MyrfKO model successfully blocks oligodendrogenesis in our hands (Supplementary Figure 1; Gazdzinski et al., 2025).

-CSRT task performance

The mice learned the 5-CSRT task and performed at a level above chance (1 in 5 = 20% choice accuracy) in post-mTBI probe trials. The evolution of accuracy and omissions over the course of the final training stage, as well as the total time required to complete the training for all mice is shown in Supplementary Figure 3. Choice accuracy decreased (β = −5.93% per 0.1 s decrease in stimulus duration, p < 2 × 10 –16) and % omissions increased (β = 1.61% per 0.1 s decrease in stimulus duration, p < 2 × 10 –16) with decreasing stimulus duration, confirming that attention was challenged as the stimulus duration was decreased (Supplementary Figure 4). Contrary to expectation, no effect of mTBI was observed on any of the 5-CSRT task measures at any of the timepoints or stimulus durations.

In the probe trial sessions, OPC-MyrfKO mice omitted more trials (β = 3.9%, p = 0.022, Supplementary Figure 4) and had fewer correct trials (β = −1.95, p = 0.049), than OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice, resulting in lower accuracy across injury groups and probe trial stimulus durations at all timepoints (main effect of genotype across all timepoints: β = −4.26%, p Bonf = 0.003; Figure 2), suggesting impaired attention in these mice.

The inter-probe rebaselining sessions (2-s stimulus duration) provided a means to investigate whether the observed impairment was specific to the reduced stimulus duration sessions, in which attention was challenged. Accuracy was similar between OPC-MyrfKO and OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice in these rebaselining trials, however, OPC-MyrfKO mice had more omitted trials during these sessions (β = 1.3%, p = 0.041), indicating that these mice were more likely to omit trials even if they were unlikely to have missed the stimulus. This suggests that the OPC-MyrfKO mice may have been less motivated to perform the task (Supplementary Figure 5). A significant genotype-by-timepoint interaction in the proportion of premature trials was also observed (β = −0.30%, p Bonf = 0.03), reflecting that by 8 weeks post-mTBI, OPC-MyrfKO mice had significantly fewer premature trials than OPC-Myrf-CTRL mice (β = −4.8%, p = 0.017 at 8 weeks and β = −5.19%, p = 0.027 at 12 weeks, Figure 3). While an increase in premature trials is usually interpreted as a lack of inhibitory control, the decrease observed here supports the interpretation that OPC-MyrfKO mice may have been less engaged by the task and therefore generally less likely to interact with the touchscreen. The widening difference in performance between the OPC-MyrfKO and OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice over time suggests that the impact of halted oligodendrogenesis may increase over time. The interpretation of a decreased level of motivation in the OPC-MyrfKO mice is further supported by the observation that these mice were slower to collect the reward (β = 0.15 s, p Bonf = 0.014) compared to OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice (Supplementary Figure 6). Several published studies have provided evidence that OPC-MyrfKO mice have normal locomotor function (McKenzie et al., 2014; Shimizu et al., 2023). This is also supported by data from a separate study in our lab, in which OPC-MyrfKO mice had similar total alternations on the Y-maze out to 12 weeks (β = −1.81, p = 0.165) after tamoxifen administration compared to OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice (Supplementary Figure 7). Together, these results suggest the poorer task performance by OPC-MyrfKO mice is unlikely to be driven by locomotor deficit and that attention and motivation may both be impacted by disruption of adult oligodendrogenesis. A table of all statistical results is provided in the supplemental material (Supplementary Data Sheet 1).

4. Discussion

Difficulty with focus and attention is common after mTBI in humans (Stojanovski et al., 2021) and has been reported in several rodent model studies (Mychasiuk et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Vonder Haar et al., 2022). Given the role for myelin in supporting and tuning neural circuit function (Noori et al., 2020), we aimed to investigate how inhibiting oligodendrogenesis affects attention in mice under sham and repeated mTBI conditions, to test whether ongoing myelination contributes to recovery of attention capabilities following injury. Although we did not observe impaired attention following mTBI in this study, precluding the ability to test the planned hypothesis, halting adult oligodendrogenesis did produce modest broad impairment on task performance, providing some insight into the potential role of new myelin in attention and possibly motivation and complex task performance.

The lack of an effect of mTBI on attention measures in the 5-CSRT task suggests that the model used in the current study may be too mild or may not have the injury characteristics required to elicit measurable impairment in 5-CSRT task performance. A similar mouse model that delivered one mTBI rather than three impacts was previously characterized with transient behavioral impairment observed 3 days after injury specific to the Y-maze test sensitive to working memory and attention (Gazdzinski et al., 2020). The same single impact model demonstrated persistent structural differences and neuroinflammation in white matter (Gazdzinski et al., 2020). That said, it is not uncommon for animal models of mTBI (Shultz et al., 2012; To and Nasrallah, 2021), as well as human neuroimaging studies (Manning et al., 2017; Churchill et al., 2019), to demonstrate ongoing differences in the brain following mTBI with no detectable behavioral differences or symptoms. The absence of behavioral deficits despite the presence of structural damage may reflect functional compensation or structural redundancy, as has been demonstrated in both human and animal studies (McAllister et al., 2001; Wolf et al., 2017). Additionally, the mice may have learned the task so well that the implementation of the 5-CSRT task may not have sufficiently challenged damaged networks to elicit measurable deficits. Though previous rodent studies have reported attentional impairment post-mTBI using the 5-CSRT task, they, in general, involved a higher number of impacts (≥5), incorporated a higher degree of rotational acceleration, were conducted in rats, or trained the animals after the injury, in which case task performance may be confounded by learning challenges post-mTBI (Mychasiuk et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2021; Vonder Haar et al., 2022).

Despite the absence of an attentional deficit following mTBI, the results suggest a role for oligodendrogenesis in attention and task engagement. Accuracy was high with the 0.8 s stimulus duration and decreased in all groups with decreasing stimulus duration, confirming that the mice learned the task well and that attention was being challenged with the shorter stimulus durations. Mice with halted oligodendrogenesis had lower accuracy across injury groups and probe-trial stimulus durations at all timepoints and had fewer premature trials at the later timepoints. These mice were also slower to collect the rewards following correct touches. OPC-MyrfKO mice had similar accuracy as controls with the longer 2-s stimulus duration presented during the inter-probe trial rebaselining sessions, supporting the interpretation that attention is impaired when adult oligodendrogenesis is blocked. The higher omission rate and longer reward collection latency of these mice across injury groups, stimulus durations, and timepoints, and the lower rate of premature trials at the later timepoints, suggest that these mice may also be less motivated to perform the task and that the effect of oligodendrogenesis inhibition may broaden over time.

Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination (Gibson et al., 2014) and oligodendrocytes provide support to axons through functions unrelated to myelin (Duncan et al., 2021; Krämer-Albers and Werner, 2023; Simons et al., 2024). These functions allow oligodendrocytes to contribute to experience dependent fine-tuning of neural circuits important for learning and memory (McKenzie et al., 2014; Xiao et al., 2016; Bacmeister et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Steadman et al., 2020; Munyeshyaka and Fields, 2022; Shimizu et al., 2023; Yalçın et al., 2024). Reduced myelin turnover and remodeling reduces circuit plasticity, potentially impairing network function required for cognition. Evidence for altered brain activity following the inhibition of oligodendrogenesis in a similar mouse model to the one used here has been recently demonstrated using electroencephalography (EEG) by Kaller et al. (2024).

Altered patterns of neural activity and myelination have been reported in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (Lin et al., 2024; Gao et al., 2025; Gholamipourbarogh et al., 2025; Hu et al., 2025; Mizuno et al., 2025) and reduced neural activity and myelin content have been observed in several conditions associated with anhedonia and lack of motivation, including social deprivation (Liu et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2023), chronic stress (Kokkosis et al., 2022), and major depressive disorder (Sacchet and Gotlib, 2017). Relevant to the results presented here, using similar mice, a recent study by Yalçın et al. (2024) demonstrated that active oligodendrogenesis is required for opioid-induced rewards learning using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. Interestingly, this did not translate to general rewards behavior such that the mice displayed normal food-induced CPP, naloxone-induced aversion learning, and sucrose preference. While food reward is a component of the 5-CSRT paradigm, the task is more complex than Pavlovian conditioning and therefore likely relies on coordinated activity across a distinct neural network. The details of this network and the mechanisms underlying the role of oligodendrogenesis in maintaining its function remain open questions.

There are limitations that should be considered while interpreting the results from this study. First, a comprehensive characterization of brain pathology beyond the presence of axonal degeneration in the corpus callosum following mTBI was not included, therefore the extent of the injury is assumed based on previous work. Several studies using similar models, including some involving a single impact, have reported pathological changes in the white matter assessed with histopathology and/or magnetic resonance imaging that persisted for several weeks to months post-injury (Yu et al., 2017; Lyons et al., 2018; Gazdzinski et al., 2020). Second, while overt motor or sensory deficits were not observed in the OPC-MyrfKO mice and we provide evidence from a separate study that suggests that these mice have normal locomotor ability, a comprehensive assessment of motor and sensory function was not included, thus it is possible that subtle deficits in these domains contribute to the poorer task performance in these mice. It is also possible that these mice may be more sensitive than OPC-MyrfKO-CTRL mice to the prolonged food deprivation and/or age-related changes, which may contribute to the observed phenotype. Third, the inducible MyrfKO model relies on tamoxifen administration and Cre recombinase under the control of the NG2 promoter. Tamoxifen can have toxic side effects and while this is expected to be common across all groups in the study, it is possible that some mice are more susceptible to these effects than others. NG2 is expressed not only in OPCs, but also in other cells, including pericytes, thus it is likely that Cre recombinase activity was also induced in off-target cells. As Myrf is not expressed in these other cell populations, the Cre recombinase activity in these other cell populations is unlikely to have had a direct effect on gene expression in these cells, but other effects cannot be ruled out (McKenzie et al., 2014; Pan et al., 2020; He et al., 2024; Kaller et al., 2024; Xin et al., 2024; Gazdzinski et al., 2025).

In conclusion, difficulty with attention is common after mTBI and can affect many aspects of cognition and quality of life. Identification of therapeutic targets is urgently needed and given myelin’s role in neural circuit function and its vulnerability to injury, myelin plasticity remains a potential candidate. While we did not observe impaired attention on the 5-CSRT task following mTBI in this study, mice unable to generate new myelin showed reduced task accuracy, possibly influenced by motivational processes. These findings suggest that adult oligodendrogenesis supports attention and complex behavior. Future research may aim to optimize the injury model to better recapitulate the cognitive impairments observed in humans, including attention, or investigate the role of oligodendrogenesis in motivation with tests better suited to specifically measure this behavior.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) awarded to AW (reference number PJT 180364). Funding for the 5-CSRT systems was provided by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI).

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics approval

The animal study was approved by the Centre for Phenogenomics Animal Care Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

LG: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MM: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. PF: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. AW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

The Myrf<sup>flox/flox</sup> mice were a kind gift from Paul Frankland’s lab at the Hospital for Sick Children. We thank Xinyi Lin and Nicholas Wilson for their assistance with the 5-CSRT training. A prior version of this manuscript was posted as a preprint on bioRxiv (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.01.673570).

References

  1. Akers K. G., Martinez-Canabal A., Restivo L., Yiu A. P., De Cristofaro A., Hsiang H. L. et al. (2014). Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy. Science 344 598 – 602. doi:10.1126/science.1248903
  2. Armstrong R. C., Mierzwa A. J., Marion C. M., Sullivan G. M. (2016). White matter involvement after TBI: Clues to axon and myelin repair capacity. Exp. Neurol. 275 328 – 333. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.02.011
  3. Bacmeister C. M., Barr H. J., McClain C. R., Thornton M. A., Nettles D., Welle C. G. et al. (2020). Motor learning promotes remyelination via new and surviving oligodendrocytes. Nat. Neurosci. 23 819 – 831. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0637-3
  4. Banich M. T. (1998). The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn. 36 128 – 157. doi:10.1006/brcg.1997.0950
  5. Brown W. S., Panos A., Paul L. K. (2020). Attention, impulsivity, and vigilance in agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychology 34 744 – 749. doi:10.1037/neu0000685
  6. Cancelliere C., Verville L., Stubbs J. L., Yu H., Hincapié C. A., Cassidy J. D. et al. (2023). Post-Concussion symptoms and disability in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma 40 1045 – 1059. doi:10.1089/neu.2022.0185
  7. Churchill N. W., Hutchison M. G., Graham S. J., Schweizer T. A. (2019). Mapping brain recovery after concussion: From acute injury to 1 year after medical clearance. Neurology 93 E1980 – E1992. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008523
  8. Collins L. K., Ofa S. A., Miskimin C., Mulcahey M. (2023). Cognitive deficits following concussion: A systematic review. J. Orthopaedic Exp. Innov. 4. doi:10.60118/001c.68393
  9. Cook A. J., Im H. Y., Giaschi D. E. (2025). Large-scale functional networks underlying visual attention. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 173: 106165. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106165
  10. Daugherty J., Depadilla L., Sarmiento K., Breiding M. J. (2020). Self-Reported lifetime concussion among adults: Comparison of 3 different survey questions. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 35 E136 – E143. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000534
  11. Duncan G. J., Manesh S. B., Hilton B. J., Assinck P., Liu J., Moulson A. et al. (2018). Locomotor recovery following contusive spinal cord injury does not require oligodendrocyte remyelination. Nat. Commun. 9: 3066. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05473-1
  12. Duncan G. J., Simkins T. J., Emery B. (2021). Neuron-Oligodendrocyte interactions in the structure and integrity of axons. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9: 653101. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.653101
  13. Filley C. M., Fields R. D. (2016). White matter and cognition: Making the connection. J. Neurophysiol. 116 2093 – 2104. doi:10.1152/jn.00221.2016
  14. Fizet J., Cassel J. C., Kelche C., Meunier H. (2016). A review of the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time (5-CSRT) task in different vertebrate models. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 71 135 – 153. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.027
  15. Gao Z., Duberg K., Warren S. L., Zheng L., Hinshaw S. P., Menon V. et al. (2025). Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD. Nat. Commun. 16: 2346. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57685-x
  16. Gazdzinski L. M., Mellerup M., Wang T., Adel S. A. A., Lerch J. P., Sled J. G. et al. (2020). White matter changes caused by mild traumatic brain injury in mice evaluated using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. J. Neurotrauma 37 1818 – 1828. doi:10.1089/neu.2020.6992
  17. Gazdzinski L., Mak J., Gumarathas K., Mellerup M., Collin A., Sled J. G. et al. (2025). Oligodendrogenesis inhibition in the juvenile and adolescent periods differentially alters myelin in mice. Dev. Neurosci. 48 282 – 292. doi:10.1159/000547880
  18. Gholamipourbarogh N., Roessner V., Bluschke A., Beste C. (2025). Novel neural activity profiles underlying inhibitory control deficits of clinical relevance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Insights from electroencephalography tensor decomposition. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.05.001
  19. Gibson E. M., Purger D., Mount C. W., Goldstein A. K., Lin G. L., Wood L. S. et al. (2014). Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination in the mammalian brain. Science 344: 1252304. doi:10.1126/science.1252304
  20. Glaser J., Jaeckle S., Beblo T., Mueller G., Eidenmueller A. M., Schulz P. et al. (2024). The effect of repeated concussions on clinical and neurocognitive symptom severity in different contact sports. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 34: e14626. doi:10.1111/sms.14626
  21. Han K., Chapman S. B., Krawczyk D. C. (2016). Disrupted intrinsic connectivity among default, dorsal attention, and frontoparietal control networks in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. J. Intern. Neuropsychol. Soc. 22 263 – 279. doi:10.1017/S1355617715001393
  22. He Y., Xu Z., He Y., Liu J., Li J., Wang S. et al. (2024). Preventing production of new oligodendrocytes impairs remyelination and sustains behavioural deficits after demyelination. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 733: 150592. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150592
  23. Hong H., Guo C., Liu X., Yang L., Ren W., Zhao H. et al. (2023). Differential effects of social isolation on oligodendrocyte development in different brain regions: Insights from a canine model. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 17: 1201295. doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1201295
  24. Horner A. E., Heath C. J., Hvoslef-Eide M., Kent B. A., Kim C. H., Nilsson S. R. O. et al. (2013). The touchscreen operant platform for testing learning and memory in rats and mice. Nat. Protoc. 8 1961 – 1984. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.122
  25. Hu R., Du W., Tan F., Wu Y., Yang C., Wang W. et al. (2025). Dynamic alterations in spontaneous neural activity in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A resting-state fMRI study. Brain Res. Bull. 222: 111230. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111230
  26. Johnson V. E., Stewart W., Smith D. H. (2013). Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 246 35 – 43. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013
  27. Kaller M. S., Lazari A., Feng Y., van der Toorn A., Rühling S., Thomas C. W. et al. (2024). Ablation of oligodendrogenesis in adult mice alters brain microstructure and activity independently of behavioral deficits. Glia 72 1728 – 1745. doi:10.1002/glia.24576
  28. Kokkosis A. G., Madeira M. M., Mullahy M. R., Tsirka S. E. (2022). Chronic stress disrupts the homeostasis and progeny progression of oligodendroglial lineage cells, associating immune oligodendrocytes with prefrontal cortex hypomyelination. Mol. Psychiatry 27 2833 – 2848. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01512-y
  29. Krämer-Albers E. M., Werner H. B. (2023). Mechanisms of axonal support by oligodendrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24 474 – 486. doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00711-y
  30. Lin L., Chen Y., Dai Y., Yan Z., Zou M., Zhou Q. et al. (2024). Quantification of myelination in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparative assessment with synthetic MRI and DTI. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 33 1935 – 1944. doi:10.1007/s00787-023-02297-3
  31. Lindsey H. M., Hodges C. B., Greer K. M., Wilde E. A., Merkley T. L. (2023). Diffusion-Weighted imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of the literature. Neuropsychol. Rev. 33 42 – 121. doi:10.1007/s11065-021-09485-5
  32. Liu J., Dietz K., Deloyht J. M., Pedre X., Kelkar D., Kaur J. et al. (2012). Impaired adult myelination in the prefrontal cortex of socially isolated mice. Nat. Neurosci. 15 1621 – 1623. doi:10.1038/nn.3263
  33. Lotocki G., de Rivero Vaccari J. P., Alonso O., Molano J. S., Nixon R., Safavi P. et al. (2011). Oligodendrocyte vulnerability following traumatic brain injury in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 499 143 – 148. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.056
  34. Lyons D. N., Vekaria H., Macheda T., Bakshi V., Powell D. K., Gold B. T. et al. (2018). A mild traumatic brain injury in mice produces lasting deficits in brain metabolism. J. Neurotrauma 35 2435 – 2447. doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5663
  35. Manning K. Y., Schranz A., Bartha R., Dekaban G. A., Barreira C., Brown A. et al. (2017). Multiparametric MRI changes persist beyond recovery in concussed adolescent hockey players. Neurology 89 2157 – 2166. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004669
  36. Mar A. C., Horner A. E., Nilsson S. R. O., Alsiö J., Kent B. A., Kim C. H. et al. (2013). The touchscreen operant platform for assessing executive function in rats and mice. Nat. Protoc. 8 1985 – 2005. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.123
  37. McAllister T. W., Sparling M. B., Flashman L. A., Guerin S. J., Mamourian A. C., Saykin A. J. (2001). Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 14 1004 – 1012. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0899
  38. McKenzie I. A., Ohayon D., Li H., de Faria J. P., Emery B., Tohyama K. et al. (2014). Motor skill learning requires active central myelination. Science 346 318 – 322. doi:10.1126/science.1254960
  39. Mierzwa A. J., Marion C. M., Sullivan G. M., Mcdaniel D. P., Armstrong R. C. (2015). Components of myelin damage and repair in the progression of white matter pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 74 218 – 232. doi:10.1097/NEN.0000000000000165
  40. Mizuno Y., Yamashita M., Shou Q., Hamatani S., Cai W. (2025). A brief review of MRI studies in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and future perspectives. Brain Dev. 47: 104340. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2025.104340
  41. Munyeshyaka M., Fields R. D. (2022). Oligodendroglia are emerging players in several forms of learning and memory. Commun. Biol. 5: 1148. doi:10.1038/s42003-022-04116-y
  42. Mychasiuk R., Hehar H., Esser M. J. (2015). A mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) induces secondary attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-like symptomology in young rats. Behav. Brain Res. 286 285 – 292. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.010
  43. Nonaka M., Taylor W. W., Bukalo O., Tucker L. B., Fu A. H., Kim Y. et al. (2021). Behavioral and myelin-related abnormalities after blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Neurotrauma 38 1551 – 1571. doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7254
  44. Noori R., Park D., Griffiths J. D., Bells S., Frankland P. W., Mabbott D. et al. (2020). Activity-dependent myelination: A glial mechanism of oscillatory self-organization in large-scale brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 13227 – 13237. doi:10.1073/pnas.1916646117
  45. Pan S., Mayoral S. R., Choi H. S., Chan J. R., Kheirbek M. A. (2020). Preservation of a remote fear memory requires new myelin formation. Nat. Neurosci. 23 487 – 499. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0582-1
  46. Posner M. I., Rothbart M. K., Voelker P. (2016). Developing brain networks of attention. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 28 720 – 724. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000413
  47. Povlishock J. T. (1993). Pathobiology of traumatically induced axonal injury in animals and man. Ann. Emerg. Med. 22 980 – 986. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82738-6
  48. R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Core Team.
  49. Sacchet M. D., Gotlib I. H. (2017). Myelination of the brain in major depressive disorder: An in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci. Rep. 7: 2200. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02062-y
  50. Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S., Eliceiri K. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 671 – 675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089
  51. Shi H., Hu X., Leak R. K., Shi Y., An C., Suenaga J. et al. (2016). Demyelination as a rational therapeutic target for ischemic or traumatic brain injury HHS public access. Exp. Neurol. 272 17 – 25. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.03.017
  52. Shimizu T., Nayar S. G., Swire M., Jiang Y., Grist M., Kaller M. et al. (2023). Oligodendrocyte dynamics dictate cognitive performance outcomes of working memory training in mice. Nat. Commun. 14: 6499. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42293-4
  53. Shultz S. R., MacFabe D. F., Foley K. A., Taylor R., Cain D. P. (2012). Sub-concussive brain injury in the Long-Evans rat induces acute neuroinflammation in the absence of behavioral impairments. Behav. Brain Res. 229 145 – 152. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.015
  54. Simons M., Gibson E. M., Nave K.-A. (2024). Oligodendrocytes: Myelination and axonal support. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 16: a041359. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041359
  55. Smirl J. D., Jones K. E., Copeland P., Khatra O., Taylor E. H., Van Donkelaar P. (2019). Characterizing symptoms of traumatic brain injury in survivors of intimate partner violence. Brain Inj. 33 1529 – 1538. doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1658129
  56. Steadman P. E., Xia F., Ahmed M., Mocle A. J., Penning A. R. A., Geraghty A. C. et al. (2020). Disruption of oligodendrogenesis impairs memory consolidation in adult mice. Neuron 105 150 – 164.e6. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.013
  57. Stojanovski S., Scratch S. E., Dunkley B. T., Schachar R., Wheeler A. L. (2021). A systematic scoping review of new attention problems following traumatic brain injury in children. Front. Neurol. 12: 751736. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.751736
  58. Sullivan G. M., Mierzwa A. J., Kijpaisalratana N., Tang H., Wang Y., Song S. K. et al. (2013). Oligodendrocyte lineage and subventricular zone response to traumatic axonal injury in the corpus callosum. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 72 1106 – 1125. doi:10.1097/NEN.0000000000000009
  59. To X. V., Nasrallah F. A. (2021). A roadmap of brain recovery in a mouse model of concussion: Insights from neuroimaging. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 9: 2. doi:10.1186/s40478-020-01098-y
  60. Vonder Haar C., Wampler S. K., Bhatia H. S., Ozga J. E., Toegel C., Lake A. D. et al. (2022). Repeat closed-head injury in male rats impairs attention but causes heterogeneous outcomes in multiple measures of impulsivity and glial pathology. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 16: 809249. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.809249
  61. Weber A. M., Torres C., Rauscher A. (2018). Imaging the role of myelin in concussion. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 28 83 – 90. doi:10.1016/j.nic.2017.09.005
  62. Wolf J. A., Johnson B. N., Johnson V. E., Putt M. E., Browne K. D., Mietus C. J. et al. (2017). Concussion induces hippocampal circuitry disruption in swine. J. Neurotrauma 34 2303 – 2314. doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4848
  63. Xiao L., Ohayon D., Mckenzie I. A., Sinclair-Wilson A., Wright J. L., Fudge A. D. et al. (2016). Rapid production of new oligodendrocytes is required in the earliest stages of motor-skill learning. Nat. Neurosci. 19 1210 – 1217. doi:10.1038/nn.4351
  64. Xin W., Kaneko M., Roth R. H., Zhang A., Nocera S., Ding J. B. et al. (2024). Oligodendrocytes and myelin limit neuronal plasticity in visual cortex. Nature 633 856 – 863. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07853-8
  65. Xu X., Cowan M., Beraldo F., Schranz A., McCunn P., Geremia N. et al. (2021). Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in mice triggers a slowly developing cascade of long-term and persistent behavioral deficits and pathological changes. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 9: 60. doi:10.1186/s40478-021-01161-2
  66. Yalçın B., Pomrenze M. B., Malacon K., Drexler R., Rogers A. E., Shamardani K. et al. (2024). Myelin plasticity in the ventral tegmental area is required for opioid reward. Nature 630 677 – 685. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07525-7
  67. Yates L. C., Yates E., Li X., Lu Y., Yakoub K., Davies D. et al. (2025). Developing a multivariate model for the prediction of concussion recovery in sportspeople: A machine learning approach. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 11: e002090. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002090
  68. Yu F., Shukla D. K., Armstrong R. C., Marion C. M., Radomski K. L., Selwyn R. G. et al. (2017). Repetitive model of mild traumatic brain injury produces cortical abnormalities detectable by magnetic resonance diffusion imaging, histopathology, and behavior. J. Neurotrauma 34 1364 – 1381. doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4569
  69. Zaimi A., Wabartha M., Herman V., Antonsanti P. L., Perone C. S., Cohen-Adad J. (2018). AxonDeepSeg: Automatic axon and myelin segmentation from microscopy data using convolutional neural networks. Sci. Rep. 8: 3816. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22181-4
  70. Zhang L., Levenson C. W., Salazar V. C., McCarthy D. M., Biederman J., Zafonte R. et al. (2021). Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in a perinatal nicotine exposure mouse model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Dev. Neurosci. 43 63 – 72. doi:10.1159/000515198

Citation

Gazdzinski, L. M., et al. (2026). Inhibited oligodendrogenesis impairs attention and motivation in adult mice regardless of repeated mild traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Volume 20. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
20 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Gazdzinski, Mak, Mellerup, Fletcher and Wheeler.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Anne L. Wheeler

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0