Skip to content
Frontiers
Search

Neuroenergetics

Frontiers in Neuroenergetics ·

Volume 2 - 2010 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00015

Does Neural Input or Processing Play a Greater Role in the Magnitude of Neuroimaging Signals?

  • Sam Harris1
  • Myles Jones1
  • Ying Zheng1
  • Jason Berwick1*corresponding author
  1. 1 Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK
Article metrics0 viewsView details
PDFCiteMetrics

Abstract

An important constraint on how hemodynamic neuroimaging signals such as fMRI can be interpreted in terms of the underlying evoked activity is an understanding of neurovascular coupling mechanisms that actually generate hemodynamic responses. The predominant view at present is that the hemodynamic response is most correlated with synaptic input and subsequent neural processing rather than spiking output. It is still not clear whether input or processing is more important in the generation of hemodynamics responses. In order to investigate this we measured the hemodynamic and neural responses to electrical whisker pad stimuli in rat whisker barrel somatosensory cortex both before and after the local cortical injections of the GABA A agonist muscimol. Muscimol would not be expected to affect the thalamocortical input into the cortex but would inhibit subsequent intra-cortical processing. Pre-muscimol infusion whisker stimuli elicited the expected neural and accompanying hemodynamic responses to that reported previously. Following infusion of muscimol, although the temporal profile of neural responses to each pulse of the stimulus train was similar, the average response was reduced in magnitude by ∼79% compared to that elicited pre-infusion. The whisker-evoked hemodynamic responses were reduced by a commensurate magnitude suggesting that, although the neurovascular coupling relationships were similar for synaptic input as well as for cortical processing, the magnitude of the overall response is dominated by processing rather than from that produced from the thalamocortical input alone.

Keywords

References

  1. Angenstein F., Kammerer E., Scheich H. (2009). The BOLD response in the rat hippocampus depends rather on local processing of signals than on the input or output activity. A combined functional MRI and electrophysiological study. J. Neurosci. 29, 2428 – 2439. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5015-08.2009
  2. Berwick J., Johnston D., Jones M., Martindale J., Martin C., Kennerley A. J., Redgrave P., Mayhew J. E. (2008). Fine detail of neurovascular coupling revealed by spatiotemporal analysis of the hemodynamic response to single whisker stimulation in rat barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 787 – 798. doi:10.1152/jn.00658.2007
  3. Berwick J., Johnston D., Jones M., Martindale J., Redgrave P., McLoughlin N., Schiessl I., Mayhew J. E. (2005). Neurovascular coupling investigated with two-dimensional optical imaging spectroscopy in rat whisker barrel cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 1655 – 1666. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04347.x
  4. Caesar K., Offenhauser N., Lauritzen M. (2008). Gamma-aminobutyric acid modulates local brain oxygen consumption and blood flow in rat cerebellar cortex. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 28, 906 – 915. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600581
  5. Caesar K., Thomsen K., Lauritzen M. (2003). Dissociation of spikes, synaptic activity, and activity-dependent increments in rat cerebellar blood flow by tonic synaptic inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 16000 – 16005. doi:10.1073/pnas.2635195100
  6. Ebner F. F., Armstrong-James M. A. (1990). Intracortical processes regulating the integration of sensory information. Prog. Brain Res. 86, 129 – 141. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63172-6
  7. Franceschini M. A., Nissila I., Wu W., Diamond S. G., Bonmassar G., Boas D. A. (2008). Coupling between somatosensory evoked potentials and hemodynamic response in the rat. Neuroimage 41, 189 – 203. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.061
  8. Goense J. B., Ku S. P., Merkle H., Tolias A. S., Logothetis N. K. (2008). fMRI of the temporal lobe of the awake monkey at 7 T. Neuroimage 39, 1081 – 1093. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.038
  9. Golanov E. V., Yamamoto S., Reis D. J. (1994). Spontaneous waves of cerebral blood flow associated with a pattern of electrocortical activity. Am. J. Physiol. 266, R204 – R214.
  10. Higley M. J., Contreras D. (2007). Cellular mechanisms of suppressive interactions between somatosensory responses in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 647 – 658. doi:10.1152/jn.00777.2006
  11. Jones M., Berwick J., Johnston D., Mayhew J. (2001). Concurrent optical imaging spectroscopy and laser-Doppler flowmetry: the relationship between blood flow, oxygenation, and volume in rodent barrel cortex. Neuroimage 13, 1002 – 1015. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0808
  12. Jones M., Berwick J., Mayhew J. (2002). Changes in blood flow, oxygenation, and volume following extended stimulation of rodent barrel cortex. Neuroimage 15, 474 – 487. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1000
  13. Jones M., Hewson-Stoate N., Martindale J., Redgrave P., Mayhew J. (2004). Nonlinear coupling of neural activity and CBF in rodent barrel cortex. Neuroimage 22, 956 – 965. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.007
  14. Kennerley A. J., Berwick J., Martindale J., Johnston D., Papadakis N., Mayhew J. E (2005). Concurrent fMRI and optical measures for the investigation of the hemodynamic response function. Magn. Reson. Med. 54, 354 – 365. doi:10.1002/mrm.20511
  15. Lauritzen M. (2001). Relationship of spikes, synaptic activity, and local changes of cerebral blood flow. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 1367 – 1383. doi:10.1097/00004647-200112000-00001
  16. Logothetis N. K. (2007). The ins and outs of fMRI signals. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1230 – 1232. doi:10.1038/nn1007-1230
  17. Mangia S., Giove F., Tkac I., Logothetis N. K., Henry P. G., Olman C. A., Maraviglia B., Di Salle F., Ugurbil K. (2009). Metabolic and hemodynamic events after changes in neuronal activity: current hypotheses, theoretical predictions and in vivo NMR experimental findings. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 29, 441 – 463. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2008.134
  18. Martindale J., Mayhew J., Berwick J., Jones M., Martin C., Johnston D., Redgrave P., Zheng Y. (2003). The hemodynamic impulse response to a single neural event. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23, 546 – 555. doi:10.1097/01.WCB.0000058871.46954.2B
  19. Mitzdorf U. (1985). Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol. Rev. 65, 37 – 100.
  20. Nakai M., Maeda M. (1999). Scopolamine-sensitive and resistant components of increase in cerebral cortical blood flow elicited by periaqueductal gray matter of rats. Neurosci. Lett. 270, 173 – 176. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00491-7
  21. Nicholson C., Freeman J. A. (1975). Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 356 – 368.
  22. Radhakrishnan I., Nissila I., Wu W., Diamond S. G., Bonmassar G., Boas D. A., Franceschini M. A. (2007). Studying the neurovascular coupling with evoked potentials and hemodynamic signals. Soc. Neurosci. 316. 4.
  23. Rauch A., Rainer G., Logothetis N. K. (2008). The effect of a serotonin-induced dissociation between spiking and perisynaptic activity on BOLD functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 6759 – 6764. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800312105
  24. Wong-Riley M. T., Welt C. (1980). Histochemical changes in cytochrome oxidase of cortical barrels after vibrissal removal in neonatal and adult mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 2333 – 2337. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.4.2333
  25. Zheng Y., Johnston D., Berwick J., Mayhew J. (2001). Signal source separation in the analysis of neural activity in brain. Neuroimage 13, 447 – 458. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0705

Citation

Harris, S., et al. (2010). Does Neural Input or Processing Play a Greater Role in the Magnitude of Neuroimaging Signals?. Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, Volume 2. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
2 - 2010

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Harris, Jones, Zheng and Berwick.

License: http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement

*Correspondence: Jason Berwick

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0

Related articles

NeuroscienceInduction of ischemic stroke in awake freely moving mice reveals that isoflurane anesthesia can mask the benefits of a neuroprotection therapyAngela Seto, Stephanie Taylor, Dustin Trudeau, Ian Swan, Jay Leung, Patrick Reeson, Kerry R. Delaney, Craig E. BrownNeuroscienceImpaired cortical mitochondrial function following TBI precedes behavioral changesWilliam D. Watson, John E. Buonora, Angela M. Yarnell, Jessica J. Lucky, Michaela I. D’Acchille, David C. McMullen, Andrew G. Boston, Andrew V. Kuczmarski, William S. Kean, Ajay Verma, Neil E. Grunberg, Jeffrey T. ColeNeuroscienceFDG-PET imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical reviewKimberly R. Byrnes, Colin M. Wilson, Fiona Brabazon, Ramona von Leden, Jennifer S. Jurgens, Terrence R. Oakes, Reed G. Selwyn