Skip to content

Neuroscience

Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience ·

Volume 2 - 2010 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2010.00110

Hemispheric Asymmetries during Processing of Immoral Stimuli

  • Lora M. Cope1,2
  • Jana Schaich Borg3,4
  • Carla L. Harenski1
  • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong5
  • Debra Lieberman6*corresponding author
  • Prashanth K. Nyalakanti1
  • Vince D. Calhoun1,7,8
  • Kent A. Kiehl1,2,8*corresponding author
  1. 11 Mind Research Network Albuquerque, NM, USA
  2. 22 Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA
  3. 33 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA
  4. 44 Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA, USA
  5. 55 Department of Philosophy, Duke University Durham, NC, USA
  6. 66 Department of Psychology, University of Miami Coral Gables, FL, USA
  7. 77 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA
  8. 88 Department of Neuroscience, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Evolutionary approaches to dissecting our psychological architecture underscore the importance of both function and structure. Here we focus on both the function and structure of our neural circuitry and report a functional bilateral asymmetry associated with the processing of immoral stimuli. Many processes in the human brain are associated with functional specialization unique to one hemisphere. With respect to emotions, most research points to right-hemispheric lateralization. Here we provide evidence that not all emotional stimuli share right-hemispheric lateralization. Across three studies employing different paradigms, the processing of negative morally laden stimuli was found to be highly left -lateralized. Regions of engagement common to the three studies include the left medial prefrontal cortex, left temporoparietal junction, and left posterior cingulate. These data support the hypothesis that processing of immoral stimuli preferentially engages left hemispheric processes and sheds light on our evolved neural architecture.

Keywords

References

  1. Baron-Cohen S., Ring H. A., Wheelwright S., Bullmore E. T., Brammer M. J., Simmons A., Williams S. C. R. (1999). Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 1891 – 1898.
  2. Borod J. C., Haywood C. S., Koff E. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychol. Rev. 7, 41 – 60.
  3. Braun M., Traue H. C., Frisch S., Deighton R. M., Kessler H. (2005). Emotion recognition in stroke patients with left and right hemispheric lesion: results with a new instrument – the FEEL test. Brain Cogn. 58, 193 – 201. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.11.003
  4. Broca P. (1887). Rapport sur un memoire de M. Armand de Fleury intitulé: de l'inegalité dynamique des deux hemisphères cerébraux. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. 6, 508 – 539.
  5. Buckner R. L., Andrews-Hanna J. R., Schacter D. L. (2008). The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Cogn. Neurosci. 1124, 1 – 38.
  6. Canli T., Desmond J. E., Zhao Z., Glover G., Gabrieli J. D. E. (1998). Hemispheric asymmetry for emotional stimuli detected with fMRI. Neuroreport 9, 3233 – 3239. doi:10.1097/00001756-199810050-00019
  7. Cushman F., Young L., Hauser M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1082 – 1089.
  8. Davidson R. J. (1993). Parsing affective space: perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Neuropsychology 7, 464 – 475. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.7.4.464
  9. Davidson R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cogn. Emot. 12, 307 – 330. doi:10.1080/026999398379628
  10. Demaree H. A., Everhart D. E., Youngstrom E. A., Harrison D. W. (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance.” Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 4, 3 – 20.
  11. Ermer E., Guerin S., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Miller M. (2006). Theory of mind broad and narrow: reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 196 – 219.
  12. Freire L., Roche A., Mangin J. F. (2002). What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 470 – 484.
  13. Gainotti G. (1997). “Emotional disorders in relation to unilateral brain damage,” in Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology, eds Feinberg T. E., Farah M. (New York: McGraw-Hill), 691 – 698.
  14. Gainotti G. (2000). “Neuropsychological theories of emotions,” in The Neuropsychology of Emotions, ed. Borod J. (New York: Oxford University Press), 214 – 238.
  15. Gallagher H. L., Frith C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of “theory of mind.” Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 77 – 83.
  16. Greene J., Haidt J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 517 – 523.
  17. Greene J. D., Nystrom L. E., Engell A. D., Darley J. M., Cohen J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44, 389 – 400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
  18. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., Kanwisher N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 555 – 562.
  19. Haidt J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814 – 834.
  20. Harenski C. L., Antonenko O., Shane M. S., Kiehl K. A. (2008). Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 3, 313 – 321.
  21. Harenski C. L., Hamann S. (2006). Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations. Neuroimage 30, 313 – 324. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.034
  22. Kiehl K. A., Stevens M. C., Laurens K. R., Pearlson G., Calhoun V. D., Liddle P. F. (2005). An adaptive reflexive processing model of neurocognitive function: supporting evidence from a large scale (n=100) MRI study of an auditory oddball task. Neuroimage 25, 899 – 915. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.035
  23. Kosslyn S. M., Koenig O., Barrett A., Cave C. B., Tang J., Gabrieli J. D. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 723 – 735.
  24. Kurzban R., Dukes A., Weeden J. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3501 – 3508.
  25. Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., Cuthbert B. N. (1995). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-4). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
  26. Levy J. (1977). The mammalian brain and the adaptive advantage of cerebral asymmetry. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 299, 264 – 272.
  27. Lieberman D., Tooby J., Cosmides L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 270, 819 – 826.
  28. Meadows M. E., Kaplan R. F. (1994). Dissociation of autonomic and subjective responses to emotional slides in right-hemisphere damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 32, 847 – 856. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90022-1
  29. Miller M. B., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Young L., King D., Paggi A., Fabri M., Gazzaniga M. S. (2010). Abnormal moral reasoning in complete and partial callosotomy patients. Neuropsychologia 48, 2215 – 2220. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.021
  30. Moll J., Zahn R., de Oliveira-Souza R., Krueger F., Grafman J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 799 – 809.
  31. Nichols T. E., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J. B. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 25, 653 – 660. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005
  32. Raichle M. E., MacLeod A. M., Snyder A. Z., Powers W. J., Gusnard D. A., Shulman G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 676 – 682.
  33. Ross E. D. (1984). Right hemisphere's role in language, affective behavior and emotion. Trends Neurosci. 7, 342 – 346. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80085-5
  34. Ross E. D., Homan R. W., Buck R. (1994). Differential hemispheric lateralization of primary and social emotions – implications for developing a comprehensive neurology for emotions, repression, and the subconscious. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 7, 1 – 19.
  35. Schaich Borg J., Lieberman D., Kiehl K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1529 – 1546.
  36. Stevens M. C., Calhoun V. D., Kiehl K. A. (2005). Hemispheric differences in hemodynamics elicited by auditory oddball stimuli. Neuroimage 26, 782 – 792. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.044
  37. Stone V., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Kroll N., Knight R. (2002). Selective impairment of reasoning about social exchange in a patient with bilateral limbic system damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11531 – 11536.
  38. Tamietto M., Adenzato M., Geminiani G., de Gelder B. (2007). Fast recognition of social emotions takes the whole brain: interhemispheric cooperation in the absence of cerebral asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 45, 836 – 843. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.012
  39. Tangney J. P., Stuewig J., Mashek D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 345 – 372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
  40. Vallortigara G., Rogers L. J. (2005). Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 575 – 633.
  41. Vallortigara G., Rogers L. J., Bisazza A. (1999). Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res. Rev. 30, 164 – 175.
  42. Wittling W. (1995). “Brain asymmetry in the control of autonomic-physiologic activity,” in Brain Asymmetry, eds Davidson R. J., Hugdahl K. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 305 – 357.
  43. Wittling W., Roschmann R. (1993). Emotion-related hemisphere asymmetry: subjective emotional responses to laterally presented films. Cortex 29, 431 – 448.
  44. Young L., Camprodon J. A., Hauser M., Pascual-Leone A., Saxe R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 6753 – 6758.
  45. Young L., Cushman F., Hauser M., Saxe R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 8235 – 8240.
  46. Young L., Koenigs M. (2007). Investigating emotion in moral cognition: a review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Br. Med. Bull. 84, 69 – 79.
  47. Young L., Saxe R. (2008). The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. Neuroimage 40, 1912 – 1920. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057
  48. Young L., Saxe R. (2009). Innocent intentions: a correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity. Neuropsychologia 47, 2065 – 2072. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.020

Citation

Cope, L. M., et al. (2010). Hemispheric Asymmetries during Processing of Immoral Stimuli. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, Volume 2. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
2 - 2010

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Cope, Schaich Borg, Harenski, Sinnott-Armstrong, Lieberman, Nyalakanti, Calhoun and Kiehl.

License: http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement

*Correspondence: Debra Lieberman; Kent A. Kiehl

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0