Skip to content

Neuroscience

Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience ·

Volume 3 - 2011 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2011.00001

Can We Measure Memes?

  • Adam McNamara1*corresponding author
  1. 1 Department of Psychology, University of Surrey Surrey, UK
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Memes are the fundamental unit of cultural evolution and have been left upon the periphery of cognitive neuroscience due to their inexact definition and the consequent presumption that they are impossible to measure. Here it is argued that although a precise definition of memes is rather difficult it does not preclude highly controlled experiments studying the neural substrates of their initiation and replication. In this paper, memes are termed as either internally or externally represented (i-memes/e-memes) in relation to whether they are represented as a neural substrate within the central nervous system or in some other form within our environment. It is argued that neuroimaging technology is now sufficiently advanced to image the connectivity profiles of i-memes and critically, to measure changes to i-memes over time, i.e., as they evolve. It is argued that it is wrong to simply pass off memes as an alternative term for “stimulus” and “learnt associations” as it does not accurately account for the way in which natural stimuli may dynamically “evolve” as clearly observed in our cultural lives.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbib M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 105 – 124; discussion 125 – 167.
  2. Baccalá L. A., Sameshima K. (2001). PDC Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 84, 463 – 474. doi:10.1007/PL00007990
  3. Baumgaertner A., Buccino G., Lange R., McNamara A., Binkofski F. (2007). Polymodal conceptual processing of human biological actions in the left inferior frontal lobe. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 881 – 889.
  4. Berget S. M., Moore C., Sharp P. A. (1977). Spliced segments at the 5′ terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 3171 – 3175.
  5. Binkofski F., Buccino G. (2006). The role of ventral premotor cortex in action execution and action understanding. J. Physiol. Paris 99, 396 – 405. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.005
  6. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Posse S., Seitz R. J., Rizzolatti G., Freund H. (1999a). A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 3276 – 3286.
  7. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Stephan K. M., Rizzolatti G., Seitz R. J., Freund H. J. (1999b). A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging. Exp. Brain Res. 128, 210 – 213. doi:10.1007/s002210050838
  8. Biswal B., Yetkin F. Z., Haughton V. M., Hyde J. S. (1995). Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537 – 541.
  9. Blackmore S. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Blackmore S. (2005). “Evidence for memetic drive?” in Perspectives on Imitation, eds Hurley S., Chater N. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 203 – 204.
  11. Blake R. W. (1992). Efficiency and Economy in Animal Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Boi S., Solda G., Tenchini M. L. (2004). Shedding light on the dark side of the genome: overlapping genes in higher eukaryotes. Curr. Genomics 5, 509 – 524. doi:10.2174/1389202043349020
  13. Boyd R., Richardson P. J. (2000). Meme theory oversimplifies how culture changes. Sci. Am. 283, 70 – 71.
  14. Breathnach R., Mandel J. L., Chambon P. (1977). Ovalbumin gene is split in chicken DNA. Nature 270, 314 – 319.
  15. Cardoso G. C., Atwell J. W. (2010). Directional cultural change by modification and replacement of memes. Evolution 65, 295 – 300. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01102.x
  16. Cavara N. A., Hollmann M. (2008). Shuffling the deck anew: how NR3 tweaks NMDA receptor function. Mol. Neurobiol. 38, 16 – 26.
  17. Corballis M. C. (2004). FOXP2 and the mirror system. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 8, 95 – 96.
  18. Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Deng Y., Booth J. R., Chou T. L., Ding G. S., Peng D. L. (2008). Item-specific and generalization effects on brain activation when learning Chinese characters. Neuropsychologia 46, 1864 – 1876. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.010
  20. Donald M. (1993). Precis of origins of the modern mind and associated commentary. Behav. Brain Sci. 16, 737 – 791. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00032647
  21. Donald M. (2005). “Imitation and mimesis,” in Perspectives on Imitation, eds Hurley S., Chater N. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 283 – 300.
  22. Dugatkin L. A. (2000). Animals imitate, too. Sci. Am. 283, 67.
  23. Ertelt D., Small S., Solodkin A., Dettmers C., McNamara A., Binkofski F., Buccino G. (2007). Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage 36 (Suppl. 2), T164 – T173.
  24. Etzel J. A., Gazzola V., Keysers C. (2008). Testing simulation theory with cross-modal multivariate classification of fMRI data. PLoS ONE 3, e3690. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003690
  25. Fadiga L., Craighero L. (2004). Electrophysiology of action representation. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 21, 157 – 169. doi:10.1097/00004691-200405000-00004
  26. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., Rizzolatti G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 399 – 402.
  27. Ferrari P. F., Rozzi S., Fogassi L. (2005). Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 212 – 226.
  28. Feuk L., Kalervo A., Lipsanen-Nyman M., Skaug J., Nakabayashi K., Finucane B., Hartung D., Innes M., Kerem B., Nowaczyk M. J., Rivlin J., Roberts W., Senman L., Summers A., Szatmari P., Wong V., Vincent J. B., Zeesman S., Osborne L. R., Cardy J. O., Kere J., Scherer S. W., Hannula-Jouppi K. (2006). Absence of a paternally inherited FOXP2 gene in developmental verbal dyspraxia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79, 965 – 972.
  29. Friston K. J., Buechel C., Fink G. R., Morris J., Rolls E., Dolan R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6, 218 – 229. doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291
  30. Friston K. J., Frith C. D., Liddle P. F., Frackowiak R. S. (1993). Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 13, 5 – 14. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1993.4
  31. Gallese V. (2007). Before and below “theory of mind”: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 659 – 669.
  32. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (Pt 2), 593 – 609.
  33. Gautier I., Tarr M. J. (1997). Becoming a “Greeble” expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Res. 37, 1673 – 1682. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6
  34. Gilbert W. (1978). Why genes in pieces? Nature 271, 501. doi:10.1038/271501a0
  35. Goebel R., Roebroeck A., Kim D. S., Formisano E. (2003). Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21, 1251 – 1261.
  36. Gonzalez-Lima F., McIntosh A. R. (1994). Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1, 2 – 22.
  37. Goodenough O. R., Dawkins R. (1994). The ‘St Jude’ mind virus. Nature 371, 23 – 24. doi:10.1038/371023a0
  38. Guye M., Bartolomei F., Ranjeva J. P. (2008). Imaging structural and functional connectivity: towards a unified definition of human brain organization? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21, 393 – 403.
  39. Han S., Northoff G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 646 – 654.
  40. Heddon T., Ketay S., Aron A., Markus H. R., Gabrieli J. D. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychol. Sci. 19, 12 – 17.
  41. Heylighen F., Chielens K. (2008). “Evolution of Culture, Memetics,” in Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, ed. Meyers B. (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel: Springer).
  42. Higgs P. G. (2000). The mimetic transition: a simulation study of the evolution of learning by imitation. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 1355 – 1361.
  43. Iacoboni M. (2005). “Understanding others: imitation, language, and empathy,” in Perspectives on Imitation, Hurley S., Chater N. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 77 – 100.
  44. Iacoboni M., Mazziotta J. C. (2007). Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications. Ann. Neurol. 62, 213 – 218.
  45. Iqbal Z. (2010). Understanding Islamophobia: conceptualizing and measuring the construct. Eur. J. Social Sci. 13, 574 – 590.
  46. Iriki A. (2006). The neural origins and implications of imitation, mirror neurons and tool use. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 660 – 667.
  47. Keysers C., Perrett D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 8, 501 – 507.
  48. Koenig P., Smith E. E., Glosser G., DeVita C., Moore P., McMillan C., Gee J., Grossman M. (2005). The neural basis for novel semantic categorization. Neuroimage 24, 369 – 383. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.045
  49. Kohler E., Keysers C., Umilta M. A., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297, 846 – 848. doi:10.1126/science.1070311
  50. Lahav A., Saltzman E., Schlaug G. (2007). Action representation of sound: audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. J. Neurosci. 27, 308 – 314. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-06.2007
  51. Lynch K. W. (2004). Consequences of regulated pre-mRNA splicing in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 931 – 940.
  52. McIntosh A. R. (1998). Understanding neural interactions in learning and memory using functional neuroimaging. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 855, 556 – 571.
  53. McKeown M. J., Makeig S., Brown G. G., Jung T. P., Kindermann S. S., Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. (1998). Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6, 160 – 188. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:3<160::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-1
  54. McNamara A., Buccino G., Wolbers T., Glaescher J., Baumgaertner A., Binkofski F. (2008). Neural dynamics of learning sound – action associations in the mirror neuron system. PLoS ONE 3, e3845. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003845
  55. Mendel G. (1951). FACSIMILE of Gregor Mendel's “experiments in plant hybridization”. J. Hered. 42, 3 – 47.
  56. Mohr J. P. (1976). “Broca's area and Broca's aphasia,” in Studies in Neurolinguistics, eds Witaker H., Witater N. A. (New York: Academic Press), 201 – 235.
  57. Montague P. R., Berns G. S., Cohen J. D., McClure S. M., Pagnoni G., Dhamala M., Wiest M. C., Karpov I., King R. D., Apple N., Fisher R. E. (2002). Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage 16, 1159 – 1164. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1150
  58. Niven J. E., Anderson J. C., Laughlin S. B. (2007). Fly photoreceptors demonstrate energy-information trade-offs in neural coding. PLoS Biol. 5, e16. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050116
  59. Normark S., Bergstrom S., Edlund T., Grundstrom T., Jaurin B., Lindberg F. P., Olsson O. (1983). Overlapping genes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 17, 499 – 525. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.002435
  60. Raos V., Umilta M. A., Gallese V., Fogassi L. (2004). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1990 – 2002. doi:10.1152/jn.00154.2004
  61. Raos V., Umilta M. A., Murata A., Fogassi L., Gallese V. (2006). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 709 – 729. doi:10.1152/jn.00463.2005
  62. Rizzolatti G. (2005). “The mirror neuron system and imitation,” in Perspectives on Imitation, eds Hurley S., Chater N. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 55 – 76.
  63. Rizzolatti G., Arbib M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 21, 188 – 194. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0
  64. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169 – 192.
  65. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 3, 131 – 141.
  66. Rogers B. P., Morgan V. L., Newton A. T., Gore J. C. (2007). Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 25, 1347 – 1357.
  67. Roth G., Dicke U. (2005). Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 250 – 257.
  68. Rykhlevskaia E., Gratton G., Fabiani M. (2008). Combining structural and functional neuroimaging data for studying brain connectivity: a review. Psychophysiology 45, 173 – 187. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00621.x
  69. Sanna C. R., Li W. H., Zhang L. (2008). Overlapping genes in the human and mouse genomes. BMC Genomics 9, 169. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-169
  70. Sato J. R., Junior E. A., Takahashi D. Y., de Maria Felix M., Brammer M. J., Morettin P. A. (2006). A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality. Neuroimage 31, 187 – 196. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.039
  71. Sato J. R., Takahashi D. Y., Arcuri S. M., Sameshima K., Morettin P. A., Baccalá L. A. (2009). Frequency domain connectivity identification: an application of partial directed coherence in fMRI. Hum. Brain. Mapp. 30, 452 – 461. doi:10.1002/hbm.20513
  72. Sperber D. (2000). “An objection to the memetic approach to culture,” in Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, ed. Aunger R. (Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press), 163 – 175.
  73. Stumpf M. P., Thorne T., de Silva E., Stewart R., An H. J., Lappe M., Wiuf C. (2008). Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 6959 – 6964.
  74. Umiltà M. A., Kohler E., Gallese V., Fogassi L., Fadiga L., Keysers C., Rizzolatti G. (2001). I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron 31, 155 – 165. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00337-3
  75. Veeramachaneni V., Makalowski W., Galdzicki M., Sood R., Makalowska I. (2004). Mammalian overlapping genes: the comparative perspective. Genome Res. 14, 280 – 286. doi:10.1101/gr.1590904
  76. Williams J. H., Whiten A., Suddendorf T., Perrett D. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 287 – 295.
  77. Yelnik J. (2008). Modeling the organization of the basal ganglia. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 164, 969 – 976.

Citation

McNamara, A. (2011). Can We Measure Memes?. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, Volume 3. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
3 - 2011

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 McNamara.

License: http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement

*Correspondence: Adam McNamara

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0