Skip to content

Neuroscience

Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience ·

Volume 3 - 2011 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2011.00009

The Evolution of Syntax: An Exaptationist Perspective

  • W. Tecumseh Fitch1*corresponding author
  1. 1 Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The evolution of language required elaboration of a number of independent mechanisms in the hominin lineage, including systems involved in signaling, semantics, and syntax. Two perspectives on the evolution of syntax can be contrasted. The “continuist” perspective seeks the evolutionary roots of complex human syntax in simpler combinatory systems used in animal communication systems, such as iteration and sequencing. The “exaptationist” perspective posits evolutionary change of function, so that systems today used for linguistic communication might previously have served quite different functions in earlier hominids. I argue that abundant biological evidence supports an exaptationist perspective, in general, and that it must be taken seriously when considering language evolution. When applied to syntax, this suggests that core computational components used today in language could have originally served non-linguistic functions such as motor control, non-verbal thought, or spatial reasoning. I outline three specific exaptationist hypotheses for spoken language. These three hypotheses each posit a change of functionality in a precursor circuit, and its transformation into a neural circuit or region specifically involved in language today. Hypothesis 1 suggests that the precursor mechanism for intentional vocal control, specifically direct cortical control over the larynx, was manual motor control subserved by the cortico-spinal tract. The second is that the arcuate fasciculus, which today connects syntactic and lexical regions, had its origin in intracortical connections subserving vocal imitation. The third is that the specialized components of Broca’s area, specifically BA 45, had their origins in non-linguistic motor control, and specifically hierarchical planning of action. I conclude by illustrating the importance of both homology (studied via primates) and convergence (typically analyzed in birds) for testing such evolutionary hypotheses.

Keywords

References

  1. Aitken P. G. (1981). Cortical control of conditioned and spontaneous vocal behavior in rhesus monkeys. Brain Lang. 13, 171 – 184. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(81)90137-1
  2. Allman J. M. (1999). Evolving Brains. (New York: Scientifc American Library).
  3. Allott R. M. (1994). “Motor theory of language origin: the diversity of languages,” in Studies in Language Origins, eds Wind J., Jonker A., Allott R. M., Rolfe L. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 125 – 160.
  4. Amunts K., Schleicher A., Bürgel U., Mohlberg H., Uylings H. B. M., Zilles K. (1999). Broca’s region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J. Comp. Neurol. 412, 319 – 341. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-7
  5. Anwander A., Tittgemeyer M., von Cramon D. Y., Friederici A. D., Knosche T. R. (2007). Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca’s area. Cereb. Cortex 17, 816 – 825. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk034
  6. Arbib M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 105 – 167. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0547003X
  7. Bahlmann J., Schubotz R. I., Friederici A. D. (2008). Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. Neuroimage 42, 525 – 534. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.249
  8. Bellugi U., Poizner H., Klima E. S. (1990). “Mapping brain funcion for language: evidence for sign language,” in Signal and Sense, eds Edelman G. M., Gall W. E., Cowan W. M. (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 521 – 543.
  9. Berwick R. C. (1997). Syntax facit saltum: computation and the genotype and phenotype of language. J. Neurolinguistics 10, 231 – 249. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00007-9
  10. Berwick R. C., Chomsky N. (2011). “The biolinguistic program: the current state of its development,” in The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, eds Di Sciullo A. M., Boeckx C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 19 – 41.
  11. Bickerton D. (1990). Language and Species. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  12. Bickerton D. (2000). “How protolanguage became language,” in The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form, eds Knight C., Studdert-Kennedy M., Hurford J. R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 264 – 284.
  13. Bickerton D. (2007). Language evolution: a brief guide for linguists. Lingua 117, 510 – 526. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.006
  14. Bickerton D. (2010). Adam’s Tongue, New York: Hill and Wang.
  15. Brown S. (2000). “The “Musilanguage” model of music evolution,” in The Origins of Music, eds Wallin N. L., Merker B., Brown S. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), 271 – 300.
  16. Buss D. M., Haselton M. G., Shackelford T. K., Bleske A. L., Wakefield J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. Am. Psychol. 53, 533 – 548. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533
  17. Byrne R. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence. Evol. Anthropol. 5, 172 – 180. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:5<172::AID-EVAN6>3.0.CO;2-H
  18. Caramazza A., Zurif E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang. 3, 572 – 582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90005-5
  19. Carroll S. B. (2008). Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134, 25 – 36. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030
  20. Catani M., Mesulam M. (2008). The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: history and current state. Cortex 44, 953 – 961. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.002
  21. Catania K. C. (1999). A nose that looks like a hand and acts like an eye: the unusual mechanosensory system of the star-nosed mole. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185, 367 – 372. doi:10.1007/s003590050396
  22. Chomsky N. (1968). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  23. Chomsky N. (1976). On the nature of language. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 280, 46 – 57. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25470.x
  24. Chomsky N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Chomsky N. (2010). “Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language?” in The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives, eds Larson R., Deprez V., Yamakido H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 45 – 62.
  26. Clark B. (2011). Scavening, the stag hun, and the evolution of language. J. Linguist. 47, 447 – 480. doi:10.1017/S0022226711000041
  27. Darwin C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
  28. Deacon T. W. (1992). “The neural circuitry underlying primate calls and human language,” in Language Origins: A Multidisciplinary Approach, eds Wind J., Chiarelli B. A., Bichakjian B., Nocentini A. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 301 – 323.
  29. Deacon T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton.
  30. Dennett D. C. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  31. di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 91, 176 – 180.
  32. Emery N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 581 – 604. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
  33. Emery N. J., Lorincz E. N., Perrett D. I., Oram M. W., Baker C. I. (1997). Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J. Comp. Psychol. 111, 286 – 293. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.111.3.286
  34. Feenders G., Liedvogel M., Rivas M., Zapka M., Horita H., Hara E., Wada K., Mouritsen H., Jarvis E. D. (2008). Molecular mapping of movement-associated areas in the avian brain: a motor theory for vocal learning origin. PLoS ONE 3, e1768. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001768
  35. Fitch W. T. (2002). “Comparative vocal production and the evolution of speech: reinterpreting the descent of the larynx,” in The Transition to Language, ed. Wray A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 21 – 45.
  36. Fitch W. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective. Cognition 100, 173 – 215. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.009
  37. Fitch W. T. (2009). “The biology & evolution of language: “deep homology” and the evolution of innovation,” in The Cognitive Neurosciences IV, ed. Gazzaniga M. S. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 873 – 883.
  38. Fitch W. T. (2010). The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Fitch W. T., Huber L., Bugnyar T. (2010). Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies. Neuron 65, 795 – 814. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.011
  40. Fitch W. T., Reby D. (2001). The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 1669 – 1675. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1704
  41. Foerster O. (1936). “Motorische Felder und Bahnen,” in Handbuch der Neurologie, eds Band IV, Bumke O., Foerster O. (Berlin: Springer), 1 – 448.
  42. Frey R., Riede T. (2003). Sexual dimorphism of the larynx of the Mongolian Gazelle (Procapra gutturosa Pallas, 1777) (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Zool. Anz. 242, 33 – 62. doi:10.1078/0044-5231-00086
  43. Friederici A., Meyer M., von Cramon D. Y. (2000). Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain Lang. 74, 289 – 300. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2313
  44. Friederici A. D., Bahlmann J., Heim S., Schubotz R. I., Anwander A. (2006). The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2458 – 2463. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509389103
  45. Galantucci B., Fowler C. A., Turvey M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 361 – 377. doi:10.3758/BF03193857
  46. Gehring W. J., Ikeo K. (1999). Pax 6: mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 15, 371 – 377. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01776-X
  47. Gerbella M., Belmalih A., Borra E., Rozzi S., Luppino G. (2010). Cortical connections of the macaque caudal ventrolateral prefrontal areas 45A and 45B. Cereb. Cortex 20, 141 – 168. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp087
  48. Geschwind N. (1965). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain 88, 585 – 644. doi:10.1093/brain/88.2.237
  49. Geschwind N. (1970). The organization of language and the brain. Science 170, 940 – 944. doi:10.1126/science.170.3961.940
  50. Gould S. J. (1991). Exaptation: a crucial tool for evolutionary psychology. J. Soc. Issues 47, 43 – 65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01822.x
  51. Gould S. J., Vrba E. S. (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8, 4 – 15.
  52. Grossman M. (1980). A central processor for hierarchically-structured material: evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Neuropsychologia 18, 299 – 308. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(80)90125-6
  53. Groswasser Z., Korn C., Groswasser-Reider J., Solzi P. (1988). Mutism associated with buccofacial apraxia and bihemispheric lesions. Brain Lang. 34, 157 – 168. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(88)90129-0
  54. Haesler S., Rochefort C., Geogi B., Licznerski P., Osten P., Scharff C. (2007). Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus area X. PLoS Biol. 5, e321. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321
  55. Haesler S., Wada K., Nshdejan A., Morrisey E. E., Lints T., Jarvis E. D., Scharff C. (2004). FoxP2 expression in avian vocal learners and non-learners. J. Neurosci. 24, 3164 – 3175. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4369-03.2004
  56. Hagoort P. (2005a). “Broca’s complex as the unification space for language,” in Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, ed. Cutler A. (London: Lawrence Erlbaum), 157 – 172.
  57. Hagoort P. (2005b). On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 416 – 423. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004
  58. Harvey P. H., Pagel M. D. (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  59. Hayes C. (1951). The Ape in Our House. New York: Harper.
  60. Hendrick R. (ed.). (2003). Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
  61. Hewes G. W. (1973). Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Curr. Anthropol. 14, 5 – 24. doi:10.1086/201401
  62. Holstege G., Ehling T. (1996). “Two motor systems involved in the production of speech,” in Vocal Fold Physiology: Controlling Complexity and Chaos, eds Davis P. J., Fletcher N. H. (San Diego: Singular Press), 153 – 196.
  63. Horwitz B., Amunts K., Bhattacharyya R., Patkin D., Jeffries K., Zilles K., Braun A. R. (2003). Activation of Broca’s area during the production of spoken and signed language: a combined cytoarchitectonic mapping and PET analysis. Neuropsychologia 41, 1868 – 1876. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00125-8
  64. Humphrey N. K. (1976). “The social function of intellect,” in Growing Points in Ethology, eds Bateson P. P. G., Hinde R. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 303 – 317.
  65. Iacoboni M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta J. C., Rizzolatti G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3, e79. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079
  66. Jackendoff R., Pinker S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, & Chomsky). Cognition 97, 211 – 225. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006
  67. Jacob F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science 196, 1161 – 1166. doi:10.1126/science.860134
  68. Jacob F. (1982). The Possible and the Actual. New York: Pantheon.
  69. Jolly A. (1966). Lemur social behavior and primate intelligence. Science 153, 501 – 506. doi:10.1126/science.153.3735.501
  70. Jürgens U. (1994). The role of the periaqueductal grey in vocal behaviour. Behav. Brain Res. 62, 107 – 117. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(94)90017-5
  71. Jürgens U., Kirzinger A., von Cramon D. Y. (1982). The effects of deep-reaching lesions in the cortical face area on phonation: a combined case report and experimental monkey study. Cortex 18, 125 – 139.
  72. Keysers C., Gazzola V. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Prog. Brain Res. 156, 379 – 401. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56021-2
  73. Kimura D. (1993). Neuromotor Mechanisms in Human Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  74. Kingsolver J. G., Koehl M. A. R. (1985). Aerodynamics, thermoregulation, and the evolution of insect wings: differential scaling and evolutionary change. Evolution 39, 488 – 504. doi:10.2307/2408648
  75. Kuypers H. G. J. M. (1958a). Corticobulbar connections to the pons and lower brainstem in man: an anatomical study. Brain 81, 364 – 388. doi:10.1093/brain/81.3.364
  76. Kuypers H. G. J. M. (1958b). Some projections from the pericentral cortex to the pons and lower brain stem in monkey and chimpanzee. J. Comp. Neurol. 110, 221 – 255. doi:10.1002/cne.901100205
  77. Kuypers H. G. J. M. (1973). “The anatomical organization of the descending pathways and their contributions to motor control especially in primates,” in New Developments in EMG and Clinical Neurophysiology, ed. Desmedt J. E. (Basel: Karger), 38 – 68.
  78. Lashley K. (1951). “The problem of serial order in behavior,” in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior; The Hixon Symposium, ed. Jeffress L. A. (New York: Wiley), 112 – 146.
  79. Liberman A. M., Cooper F. S., Shankweiler D. P., Studdert-Kennedy M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74, 431 – 461. doi:10.1037/h0020279
  80. Liberman A. M., Mattingly I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1 – 36. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
  81. Lieberman P. (1968). Primate vocalization and human linguistic ability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1574 – 1584. doi:10.1121/1.1911299
  82. Lieberman P. (1975). On the Origins of Language. New York: Macmillan.
  83. Lieberman P. (1984). The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  84. Lieberman P. (2000). Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: the Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  85. MacNeilage P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 499 – 546. doi:10.1017/S0140525X98001265
  86. Marshall A. J., Wrangham R. W., Arcadi A. C. (1999). Does learning affect the structure of vocalizations in chimpanzees? Anim. Behav. 58, 825 – 830. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1219
  87. Matsunaga E., Okanoya K. (2008). Expression analysis of cadherins in the songbird brain: relationship to vocal system development. J. Comp. Neurol. 508, 329 – 342. doi:10.1002/cne.21676
  88. Matsunaga E., Okanoya K. (2009). Evolution and diversity in avian vocal system: an Evo-Devo model from the morphological and behavioral perspectives. Dev. Growth Differ. 51, 355 – 367. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.2009.01091.x
  89. Mithen S. (2005). The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  90. Myers R. E. (1976). Comparative neurology of vocalization and speech: proof of a dichotomy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 280, 745 – 757. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25537.x
  91. Newmeyer F. J. (1998). “On the supposed ‘counterfunctionality’ of universal grammar: some evolutionary implications,” in Approaches to the Evolution of Language, eds Hurford J. R., Studdert-Kennedy M., Knight C. (New York: Cambridge University Press), 305 – 319.
  92. Nimchinsky E. A., Gilissen E., Allman J. M., Perl D. P., Erwin J. M., Hof P. R. (1999). A neuronal morphologic type unique to humans and great apes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5268 – 5273. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.5268
  93. Pagel M. D. (1992). A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156, 434 – 442. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80636-8
  94. Piattelli-Palmarini M. (1994). Ever since language and learning: afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. Cognition 50, 315 – 346. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90034-5
  95. Pinker S., Bloom P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behav. Brain Sci. 13, 707 – 784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061
  96. Pinker S., Jackendoff R. (2005). The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95, 201 – 236. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004
  97. Pulvermüller F., Fadiga L. (2010). Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 351 – 360. doi:10.1038/nrn2811
  98. Quiring R., Walldorf U., Kloter U., Gehring W. J. (1994). Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and aniridia in humans. Science 265, 785 – 789. doi:10.1126/science.7914031
  99. Reeve H. K., Sherman P. (1993). Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q. Rev. Biol. 68, 1 – 32. doi:10.1086/417909
  100. Rempel-Clower N. L., Barbas H. (2000). The laminar pattern of connections between prefrontal and anterior temporal cortices in the rhesus monkey is related to cortical structure and function. Cereb. Cortex 10, 851 – 865. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.9.851
  101. Reynolds Losin E. A., Russell J. L., Freeman H., Meguerditchian A., Hopkins W. D. (2008). Left hemisphere specialization for oro-facial movements of learned vocal signals by captive chimpanzees. PLoS ONE 3, e2529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002529
  102. Richman B. (1993). On the evolution of speech: singing as the middle term. Curr. Anthropol. 34, 721 – 722. doi:10.1086/204217
  103. Rilling J. K., Glasser M. F., Preuss T. M., Ma X., Zhao T., Hu X., Behrens T. E. J. (2008). The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat. Neurosci. 114, 426 – 428. doi:10.1038/nn2072
  104. Rilling J. K., Seligman R. A. (2002). A quantitative morphometric comparative analysis of the primate temporal lobe. J. Hum. Evol. 42, 505 – 533. doi:10.1006/jhev.2001.0537
  105. Roe A. W., Pallas S. L., Kwon Y. H., Sur M. (1992). Visual projection routed to the auditory pathway in ferrets: receptive fields of visual neurons in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 12, 3651 – 3664.
  106. Scaife M., Bruner J. S. (1975). The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature 253, 265 – 266. doi:10.1038/253265a0
  107. Scharff C., Haesler S. (2005). An evolutionary perspective on FoxP2: strictly for the birds? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 694 – 703. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.004
  108. Scharff C., Petri J. (2011). Evo-devo, deep homology and FoxP2: implications for the evolution of speech and language. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 2124 – 2140. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0001
  109. Schoenemann P. T., Sheehan M. J., Glotzer L. D. (2005). Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other primates. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 242 – 253. doi:10.1038/nn1394
  110. Shubin N., Tabin C., Carroll S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457, 818 – 823. doi:10.1038/nature07891
  111. Striedter G. F. (2004). Principles of Brain Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
  112. Suga N., Niwa H., Taniguchi I., Margoliash D. (1987). The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 643 – 654.
  113. Sutton D., Larson C., Lindeman R. C. (1974). Neocortical and limbic lesion effects on primate phonation. Brain Res. 71, 61 – 75. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(74)90191-7
  114. van Heyningen V., Williamson K. A. (2002). PAX6 in sensory development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1161 – 1167. doi:10.1093/hmg/11.10.1161
  115. Weissengruber G. E., Forstenpointner G., Peters G., Kübber-Heiss A., Fitch W. T. (2002). Hyoid apparatus and pharynx in the lion (Panthera leo), jaguar (Panthera onca), tiger (Panthera tigris), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), and domestic cat (Felis silvestris f. catus). J. Anat. 201, 195 – 209. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00088.x
  116. Wernicke C. (1874). Der Aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Breslau: Cohn and Weigert.
  117. Wild J. M. (1993a). The avian nucleus retroambigualis: a nucleus for breathing, singing and calling. Brain Res. 606, 119 – 124. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(93)91001-9
  118. Wild J. M. (1993b). Descending projections of the songbird nucleus robustus archistriatalis. J. Comp. Neurol. 338, 225 – 241. doi:10.1002/cne.903380207
  119. Yerkes R. M., Yerkes A. W. (1929). The Great Apes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  120. Zilles K. (2004). “Architecture of the human cerebral cortex: regional and laminar organization,” in The Human Nervous System, eds Paxinos G., Mai J. K. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 997 – 1055.

Citation

Fitch, W. T. (2011). The Evolution of Syntax: An Exaptationist Perspective. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, Volume 3. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
3 - 2011

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Fitch.

License: http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement

*Correspondence: W. Tecumseh Fitch

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0