Skip to content
Frontiers
Search

Neuroscience

Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience ·

Volume 4 - 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00003

Language Development and the Ontogeny of the Dorsal Pathway

  • Angela D. Friederici1*corresponding author
  1. 1 Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany
Article metrics0 viewsView details
PDFCiteMetrics

Abstract

In the absence of clear phylogenetic data on the neurobiological basis of the evolution of language, comparative studies across species and across ontogenetic stages within humans may inform us about the possible neural prerequisites of language. In the adult human brain, language-relevant regions located in the frontal and temporal cortex are connected via different fiber tracts: ventral and dorsal pathways. Ontogenetically, it has been shown that newborns display an adult-like ventral pathway at birth. The dorsal pathway, however, seems to display two subparts which mature at different rates: one part, connecting the temporal cortex to the premotor cortex, is present at birth, whereas the other part, connecting the temporal cortex to Broca’s area, develops much later and is still not fully matured at the age of seven. At this age, typically developing children still have problems in processing syntactically complex sentences. We therefore suggest that the mastery of complex syntax, which is at the core of human language, crucially depends on the full maturation of the fiber connection between the temporal cortex and Broca’s area.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe K., Watanabe D. (2011). Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1067 – 1074. doi:10.1038/nn.2869
  2. Anwander A., Tittgemeyer M., von Cramon D. Y., Friederici A. D., Knösche T. R. (2007). Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca’s area. Cereb. Cortex 17, 816 – 825. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk034
  3. Bahlmann J., Schubotz R., Friederici A. D. (2008). Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage 42, 525 – 534. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.249
  4. Berwick R. C., Okanoya K., Beckers G. J. L., Bolhuis J. J. (2011). Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 15, 113 – 121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002
  5. Bloomfield T. C., Gentner T. Q., Margoliash T. (2011). What birds have to say about language. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 947 – 948. doi:10.1038/nn.2884
  6. Bolhuis J. J., Okanoya K., Scharff C. (2010). Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 747 – 759. doi:10.1038/nrg2892
  7. Bornkessel I., Zyssett S., Friederici A. D., von Cramon D. Y., Schlesewsky M. (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage 26, 221 – 233. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032
  8. Brauer J., Anwander A., Friederici A. D. (2011). Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cereb. Cortex 21, 459 – 466. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq108
  9. Catani M., Howard R. J., Pajevic S., Jones D. K. (2002). Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage 17, 77 – 94. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1136
  10. Chomsky N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. de Boysson-Bardies B., Sagart L., Durant C. (1984). Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language. J. Child Lang. 11, 1 – 15.
  12. de Vries M. H., Monaghan P., Knecht S., Zwitserlood P. (2008). Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition 107, 763 – 774. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.002
  13. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hertz-Pannier L., Dubois J., Mériaux S., Roche A., Sigman M., Dehaene S. (2010). Functional organization of perisylvian activation during presentation of sentences in preverbal infants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 14240 – 14245. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606302103
  14. Dittmar M., Abbot-Smith K., Lieven E., Tomasello M. (2008). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Dev. 79, 1152 – 1167. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x
  15. Dubois J., Hertz-Pannier L., Cachia A., Mangin J. F., Le Bihan D., Dehaene-Lambertz G. (2009). Structural asymmetries in the infant language and sensori-motor networks. Cereb. Cortex 19, 414 – 423. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn097
  16. Dubois J., Hertz-Pannier L., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Cointepas Y., Le Bihana D. (2006). Assessment of the early organization and maturation of infants’ cerebral white matter fiber bundles: a feasibility study using quantitative diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage 30, 1121 – 1132. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.022
  17. Fitch W. T., Hauser M. D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303, 377 – 380. doi:10.1126/science.1089401
  18. Friederici A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 13, 175 – 181. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.006
  19. Friederici A. D., Bahlmann J., Heim S., Schubotz R. I., Anwander A. (2006). The brain differentiates human, and non-human grammars: functional localization, and structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2458 – 2463. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509389103
  20. Friederici A. D., Makuuchi M., Bahlmann J. (2009). The role of the posterior superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension. Neuroreport 20, 563 – 568. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283297dee
  21. Friederici A. D., Müller J., Oberecker R. (2011). Precursors to natural grammar learning: preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS ONE 6, e17920. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017920
  22. Fujimoto H., Hasegawa T., Watanabe D. (2011). Neural coding of syntactic structure in learned vocalizations in the songbird. J. Neurosci. 31, 10023 – 10033. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1606-11.2011
  23. Gentner T. Q., Fenn K. M., Margoliash D., Nusbaum H. C. (2006). Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440, 1204 – 1207. doi:10.1038/nature04675
  24. Gervain J., Macagno F., Cogoi S., Pen A. M., Mehler J. (2008). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 14222 – 14227. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806530105
  25. Geschwind N. (1965a). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. Brain 88, 237 – 294. doi:10.1093/brain/88.2.237
  26. Geschwind N. (1965b). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. Brain 88, 585 – 644. doi:10.1093/brain/88.2.237
  27. Hahne A., Eckstein K., Friederici A. D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children’s language development. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1302 – 1318. doi:10.1162/0898929041920504
  28. Hauser M., Chomsky N., Fitch W. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569 – 1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1554d
  29. Hickok G., Poeppel D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 393 – 402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113
  30. Kudo N., Nonaka Y., Mizuno N., Mizuno K., Okanoya K. (2011), On-line statistical segmentation of a non-speech auditory stream in neonates as demonstrated by event-related brain potentials. Dev. Sci. 14, 1100 – 1106. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01056.x
  31. Leroy F., Glasel H., Dubois J., Hertz-Pannier L., Thirion B., Mangin J.-F., Dehaene-Lambertz G. (2011). Early maturation of the linguistic dorsal pathway in human infants. J. Neurosci. 31, 1500 – 1506. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4141-10.2011
  32. Makris N., Pandya D. (2009). The extreme capsule in humans and rethinking of the language circuitry. Brain Struct. Funct. 213, 343 – 358. doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0199-8
  33. Makuuchi M., Bahlmann J., Anwander A., Friederici A. D. (2009). Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 8362 – 8367. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810928106
  34. Mampe B., Friederici A. D., Christophe A., Wermke K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Curr. Biol. 19, 1994 – 1997. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064
  35. Mueller J. L., Bahlmann J., Friederici A. D. (2010). Learnability of embedded syntactic structures depends on prosodic cues. Cogn. Sci. 34, 338 – 349. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01093.x
  36. Perani D., Saccuman M. C., Scifo P., Anwander A., Spada D., Baldoli C., Poloniato A., Lohmann G., Friederici A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 16056 – 16061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102991108
  37. Perruchet P., Rey A. (2005). Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 307 – 313. doi:10.3758/BF03196377
  38. Petrides M., Pandya D. (2009). Distinct parietal and temporal pathways to the homologues of Broca’s area in the monkey. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000170. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000170
  39. Rilling J. K., Glasser M. F., Preuss T. M., Ma X. Y., Zhao T. J., Hu X. P., Behrens T. E. J. (2008). The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 426 – 428. doi:10.1038/nn2072
  40. Saur D., Kreher B. W., Schnell S., Kümmerer D., Kellmeyer P., Vry M. S., Umarova R. M., Glauche V., Abel S., Huber W., Rijntjes M., Hennig J., Weiller C. (2008). Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18035 – 18040. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805234105
  41. Scharff C., Nottebohm F. (1991). A comparative-study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system – implications for vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 11, 2896 – 2913.
  42. Teinonen T., Fellman V., Näätänen R., Alku P., Huotilainen M. (2009). Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neurosci. 10, 21. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-21
  43. Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D. (2008). Fronto-temporal brain systems supporting spoken language comprehension. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1037 – 1054. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2158
  44. Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D., Randall B., Wright P., Devereux B. J., Zhuang J., Papoutsi M., Stamatakis E. A. (2011). Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in left-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain 134, 415 – 431. doi:10.1093/brain/awq369
  45. Weiller C., Bormann T., Saur D., Musso M., Rijntjes M. (2011). How the ventral pathway got lost: and what its recovery might mean. Brain Lang. 118, 29 – 39. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.005
  46. Wilson S. M., Galantucci S., Tartaglia M. C., Rising K., Patterson D. K., Henry M. L., Ogar J. M., DeLeon J., Miller B. L., Gorno-Tempini M. L. (2011). Syntactic processing depends on dorsal language tracts. Neuron 72, 397 – 403. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.014

Citation

Friederici, A. D. (2012). Language Development and the Ontogeny of the Dorsal Pathway. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, Volume 4. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
4 - 2012

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Friederici.

License: http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement

*Correspondence: Angela D. Friederici

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0

Related articles

NeuroscienceNeurobiology of human language and its evolution: primate and non-primate perspectivesConstance Scharff, Angela D. Friederici, Michael PetridesNeuroscienceBirdsong: Is It Music to Their Ears?Sarah E. Earp, Donna L. ManeyNeuroscienceLife History Theory and Social PsychologyDonald F. Sacco, Karol Osipowicz