Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience ·

Volume 19 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2026.1943479

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is expressed in non-sensory cells in the cochlea and regulates hair cell survival

  • Sujata Pandey1
  • Brandon C. Cox1,2*corresponding author
  1. 1Department of Pharmacology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, United States
  2. 2Department of Otolaryngology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, United States
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Damage or loss of hair cells, the sensory cells for hearing, is caused by ototoxic drugs or acoustic trauma, and results in permanent hearing loss because the adult cochlea lacks regenerative capacity. Therefore, identifying pathways that regulate hair cell survival is critical. Here we investigate a novel pathway, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling in the cochlea. We demonstrate for the first time, the expression pattern of AhR in the cochlea under physiological conditions and after exposure to neomycin or noise. Under physiological conditions, AhR was strongly expressed in glia surrounding spiral ganglion neurons with low expression in the organ of Corti. Following neomycin treatment or noise exposure, AhR expression increased in supporting cells suggesting a dynamic response to hair cell injury. This hair cell to supporting cell communication is mediated in part by purinergic signaling, since treatment with ATP mimicked the effect of neomycin, and treatment with the purinergic antagonist suramin eliminated AhR upregulation. In addition, deletion of AhR from the organ of Corti significantly increased hair cell loss after neomycin treatment compared to controls with normal AhR levels. Our findings establish AhR as a cellular biosensor in supporting cells which is upregulated during hair cell injury to regulate the survival of hair cells.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Hearing loss affects nearly 1.6 billion people worldwide and continues to rise, driven by factors such as ototoxic drugs, noise exposure, and aging (Haile et al., 2021; Prasad et al., 2024). In mammals, permanent hearing impairment largely results from the loss of cochlear hair cells, which lack regenerative capacity in the adult cochlea (Bohne et al., 1976; Hawkins et al., 1976; Oesterle et al., 2008). Because hair cell loss is permanent, there is a critical need to identify endogenous signaling pathways that can sense cellular stress and promote protective or homeostatic responses within the cochlea.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor in the basic helix–loop–helix PER-ARNT-SIM (bHLH-PAS) family that functions as a cellular biosensor (Poland et al., 1976; Hoffman et al., 1991; Burbach et al., 1992; Reyes et al., 1992; Pongratz et al., 1998; Nebert, 2017; Schulte et al., 2017). AhR is activated by various ligands such as environmental toxins, xenobiotics and endogenous metabolites that result in different outcomes (Nguyen and Bradfield, 2008; Mulero-Navarro and Fernandez-Salguero, 2016). The biological outcome of AhR signaling is determined primarily by the specific structural and chemical properties of the bound ligand inducing unique conformational changes in the receptor (Denison and Faber, 2017; Nebert, 2017; Diao et al., 2025; Coumoul et al., 2026). Some AhR ligands act as environmental toxins such as 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) to damage cells, while those derived from tryptophan metabolism, have a protective function (Nebert et al., 1999; van den Berg et al., 2013; Dietrich, 2016; Hou et al., 2023). Upon ligand binding, AhR translocates to the nucleus and regulates gene expression to control pathways involved in detoxification, inflammation and cellular homeostasis (Durrin et al., 1987; Hankinson, 1995; Gu et al., 2000; Wright et al., 2017; Marinelli, 2020; Riaz et al., 2022). These properties make AhR a potential candidate for mediating stress-response signals in tissues exposed to environmental challenges and stressors. However, despite its well-characterized role as a cellular biosensor that can provide anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects in other cell types, AhR signaling has not been well studied in the cochlea.

In the central nervous system, AhR is expressed in astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes and neurons where it regulates neuronal homeostasis, modulates inflammatory responses, and supports adaptation to injury resulting in repair or protection of neurons (Petersen et al., 2000; Filbrandt et al., 2004a; Williamson, 2004; Latchney et al., 2013a; Shackleford et al., 2018; Linnerbauer et al., 2020; Rothhammer et al., 2021a; Sun et al., 2026a). Deletion of Ahr increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro and accentuates the development of an inflammatory astrocytic phenotype in vivo, in response to two different inflammatory signals, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (Ojo and Tischkau, 2025) and amyloid-β (Ojo et al., 2025). In addition, activation of AhR by the endogenous ligand, FICZ, can prevent neuronal cell death, whereas AhR inhibition promotes LPS-induced neurotoxicity (Gan and Lee, 2025). Notably, astrocytes and microglia share functional similarities with cochlear supporting cells (Bermingham-McDonogh and Reh, 2011; Monzack and Cunningham, 2013; Wan et al., 2013), suggesting a conserved role for AhR in coordinating responses to stress. This parallel provides a strong rationale for investigating AhR in the cochlea, particularly in the context of cell–cell communication.

The organ of Corti, the auditory organ located within the cochlea, relies on tightly coordinated interactions between sensory hair cells and surrounding supporting cells to maintain function and to respond to injury. Supporting cells play an active role in preserving cochlear homeostasis by regulating ionic balance, clearing damaged cells through phagocytosis, releasing trophic factors, taking up neurotransmitters and participating in repair processes in the organ of Corti (Glowatzki et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2013; Hayashi et al., 2020; Ding et al., 2025). Transcriptomic studies have identified AhR expression in supporting cells under normal conditions (Scheffer et al., 2015; Perl et al., 2018) and upregulation of AhR following hair cell damage in regenerative models such as the chicken basilar papilla (Hawkins et al., 2007). These findings suggest that AhR may function as a sensor of cellular stress, enabling supporting cells to modulate the local microenvironment and influence hair cell survival. Based on this and AhR’s role in astrocytes, we hypothesized that AhR promotes hair cell survival by mediating communication between supporting cells and hair cells during injury. In this study, we investigated the expression pattern of AhR in the normal and damaged cochlea and the mechanism of intercellular communication between injured hair cells and supporting cells mediating changes in AhR expression. We also examined the endogenous role of AhR in modulating hair cell survival following neomycin induced injury.

2. Materials and methods

Mouse model

AhR tdTomato reporter mouse line (stock #38111) (Diny et al., 2022), Sox2 CreERT2 (stock #17593) (Arnold et al., 2011) and AhR loxP/loxP (stock #6203) (Walisser et al., 2005) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Sox2 CreERT2:AhR loxP/loxP mice were injected with tamoxifen (3 mg/40 g) body weight (BW), interperitoneally (IP) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at postnatal day (P)0. All animal work was performed in accordance with approved animal protocols from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.

Noise exposure

Prior to the experiment, the acoustic environment was calibrated using a microphone (Bruel & Kjaer, Type 4,191, No 2366520) and Bruel & Kjaer-PULSE Labshop Version 13.5 software. Sound pressure levels (SPL) were measured across the enclosure, measuring all four corners and the central area of the cage to confirm a consistent sound within the target range of 105 ± 5 dB SPL. Mice were exposed to noise (8–16 kHz at 105 ± 5 dB SPL) for 1 h between 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Two mice were placed in a custom-designed cage, divided equally by a mesh wire partition to ensure individual containment while maintaining uniform sound exposure. No bedding or enrichment was present during the exposure.

Cochlear dissection and tissue preparation

Mice were anesthetized using isoflurane, decapitated and the temporal bones were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) prepared from 16% PFA (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) in 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h at room temperature. After fixation, the temporal bones were decalcified in 120 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h, transferred to 10 mM PBS and stored at 4 °C until use. For whole mount cochlear microdissections, the fixed cochlea were micro-dissected to obtain three equal cochlear turns (apex, middle and base) and stored in PBS at 4 °C (Montgomery and Cox, 2016).

For mid-modiolar sections, tissues were placed in a sucrose solution gradient from 20% sucrose overnight to 10% sucrose for 30 min in 10 mM PBS at 4 °C. The cochlea was embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) media (Fisher Health Care, Woodbury, NY) and sectioned at 10 μm thickness using a cryostat (Epredia Microm HM525, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). Sections were mounted on charged glass slides.

Cochlear explant culture

Cochleae from P2/P3 pups were micro-dissected to prepare cochlear explants. The explant dissection removes the lateral wall (including the stria vascularis and spiral ligament) as well as most of the spiral ganglion. Therefore, explants consist primarily of the sensory epithelium (organ of Corti) and some spiral ganglion neurites. The explants were placed on Millicell cell culture inserts (Sigma-Aldrich) which were coated with Cell-Tak (Discovery Labware, Inc., Bedford, MA) and incubated overnight in DMEM media (Gibco #10564–011, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco #26140079), 1% N2 supplement (Gibco, #17502001), 0.1% penicillin (Fisher Scientific, #BP29555) and amphotericin B (Gibco, #15290018) at 37 °C. Explants were transferred to antibiotic-free media supplemented with 2% FBS and N2 supplement and treated with 600 μM neomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, #N1442) or 100 μM ATP (Fisher Scientific, Eugene, OR) for 24 h.

For AhR TdTomato pups, after 24 h of neomycin or ATP treatment, explants were fixed in 4% PFA for 30–45 min at room temperature, then processed for immunostaining to assess changes in Tomato expression. For Sox2 CreER:AhR loxP/loxP pups, after 24 h of neomycin treatment, explants were washed with media four times and further incubated in media for 24 or 48 h before fixation.

ATP measurements

For the ATP assay, cochlear explants were created from C57BL/6 J mice at P2 and treated with neomycin for 24 h. Next, the cochlear sensory epithelium was lysed with ATP lysis buffer (Fisher Scientific, #16189) by vigorous mixing to induce cell lysis in 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes. The lysates were then added to the standard reaction solution prepared from an ATP determination kit (Fisher Scientific, #A22066), which utilizes the luciferase-luciferin reaction to detect and quantify ATP levels. The luminescent signal and ATP concentration was measured in a white opaque 96 well plate (Fisher Scientific, #15042) using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy, Winooski, VT).

Real time qPCR

RNA was extracted from cochlear explants using RNeasy® MicroKit (Qiagen, #74004). Four explants were pooled to generate one sample for RNA extraction. Samples were reverse transcribed for cDNA synthesis using maxima First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fisher Scientific, #K1641) followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Luminaris Color HiGreen MasterMix, Fisher Scientific, #K0391) using a CFX Connect Optics Module (Biorad, Hercules, CA). Primers for AhR were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA); Forward Primer: 5’-TTCTTAGGCTCAGCGTCAGCT-3’and Reverse Primer: 5’-GCAAATCCTGCCAGTCTCTGA-3′. Samples were run in triplicate with RPl19 (Forward Primer: 5’GGTCTGGTTGGATCCCAATG-3′ and Reverse Primer: 5’-CCCGGGAATGGACAGTCA-3′) used as the housekeeping gene. Expression levels were compared using the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl, 2001) which includes primer efficiency in the delta–delta Ct equation.

Immunofluorescent staining, confocal imaging and image analysis

The cochlear turns from whole mount dissection were immunostained as free-floating tissue as previously described (Montgomery and Cox, 2016). For the mid-modiolar sections, immunofluorescence was performed following a standard protocol (Coleman et al., 2009). Briefly, the tissue was blocked and permeabilized at room temperature for 1 h with a solution of 10% Normal Horse Serum (NHS) or Normal Goat Serum (NGS, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Fisher, Hampton, NH), and 1% Triton-X (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 10 mM PBS prior to the application of the primary antibodies. Primary antibodies (Table 1) were diluted in a solution of 10 mM PBS containing 5% NHS or NGS, 1% BSA, and 0.1% Triton-X and incubated overnight at room temperature or 37 °C. After overnight incubation with the primary antibodies, cochlear tissues were washed 3 times with 10 mM PBS for 10 min. Next, fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies were diluted 1:1000 in a solution of 5% NHS or NGS, 1% BSA, and 0.1% Triton-X in 10 mM PBS and incubated for 2 h in the dark. Following the secondary antibody incubation, samples were washed three times for 10 min each in 10 mM PBS followed by a 20-min incubation with Hoechst (1:500, Fisher Scientific) and mounted on slides using Prolong Gold (Fisher Scientific). Samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM800 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and processed using Zen 3.0 lite software (Carl Zeiss). Quantification of cells was performed in 200 μm regions from each cochlear turn. Two images per turn were imaged and averaged for hair cell counts. For quantification, cochlear whole mounts or sections were imaged using a 40X oil immersion objective. Low magnification imaging of cochlear sections was performed at 20X or 10X.

For some antibodies (Table 1), signal enhancer (Image-iT™ FX, Fisher Scientific) was applied for 30 min prior to the blocking and permealization step. For antibodies from the same host species, IgG-specific antibodies were used to target specific IgG subclasses and prevent cross-reactivity between primary antibodies.

Statistical analysis

Mice of both sexes were used in all studies and the sample size (n) represents the number of explants or mice analyzed per group. The two explants generated from the same mouse were used as independent samples. For the qPCR data, four explants were pooled to generate one sample. For the ATP assay, two explants were pooled to generate one sample. Controls were Cre-negative littermates that also received tamoxifen. All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA or a Student’s t-test using Graphpad Prism 9.0 (Graphpad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

Constitutive expression of the AhR in the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion

To investigate expression of the AhR in the cochlea under normal, physiological conditions, we used a knockin reporter mouse line Ahr tdTomato where tdTomato expression is controlled by endogenous AhR regulatory elements. The Ahr tdTomato mouse line carries a CRISPR/Cas9 mediated insertion of a P2A-tdTomato sequence immediately upstream of the stop codon in the endogenous Ahr gene. Because the P2A peptide causes ribosomal skipping, the AhR protein and the tdTomato fluorophore are synthesized as one molecule from the same transcript with cleavage after protein translation, ensuring that tdTomato is a reliable proxy for AhR expression (Szymczak-Workman et al., 2012). Whole mount dissections and mid-modiolar sections were performed at key ages including postnatal day (P)0 and 8 weeks of age (sexual maturation).

Cochlear whole mount dissections showed robust and persistent expression of tdTomato in the region medial to the organ of Corti at P0 and 8 weeks of age, while the expression of tdTomato within the organ of Corti was very low (Figure 1A). We observed many tdTomato-positive and Sox2-positive Schwann cells encasing the spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) projections from Rosenthal’s canal to the region below inner hair cells at P0 (Figures 1B,C) (n = 5). At 8 weeks, there were fewer tdTomato-positive cells in this region creating a mosaic pattern (Figures 1D–F) (n = 6). We also observed tdTomato-positive cells in the region below and medial to the inner border and inner phalangeal cells at P0 and 8 weeks of age (Figures 1G–L). These cells displayed a distinct ovoid shape and location that is similar to the unique population of nestin-positive cells that have been previously described (Chow et al., 2015; Smeti et al., 2011). Mid-modiolar sections in the middle turn showed robust and persistent expression of tdTomato in the Sox2-positive satellite glial cells surrounding Tuj1-positive SGN cell bodies at P0 (Figures 2A–F) (n = 6). At 8 weeks, qualitative assessment showed a reduced number of tdTomato-positive satellite glia compared to P0 (Figures 2G–L) (n = 6). No differences in the tdTomato expression pattern were observed across cochlear turns.

AhR is upregulated after neomycin exposure

In one RNAseq study using the chicken basilar papilla (which is similar to the mouse cochlea), AhR expression was increased in response to neomycin-induced hair cell damage (Hawkins et al., 2007) suggesting that AhR might have a role in the cellular processes that occur after hair cell injury and during regeneration. Therefore, we hypothesized that the expression of AhR would increase in the organ of Corti post-damage. To test this, we used cochlear explants created from Ahr tdTomato pups at P2. Explants were equilibrated overnight followed by treatment with 600 μM neomycin for 24 h (Figure 3A). The tdTomato signal was very low in the explants treated with media only (n = 8), however 1 out of 8 media treated controls showed a moderate number of tdTomato-positive cells in the basal region which may have been caused by mechanical injury to the hair cells during the microdissection of the cochlea. We observed increased expression of tdTomato in all the cochlear explants (9 out of 9) treated with neomycin for 24 h compared to the explants treated with media only (Figures 3B–J’). The tdTomato expression was present in a subset of Sox2-positive supporting cells located in the regions lateral and medial to the hair cells in the explants treated with neomycin (Figures 3E–J’). Note that tdTomato is expressed in the entire cell, while Sox2 only labels the nuclei of supporting cells.

To determine which supporting cell subtypes had increased tdTomato expression after neomycin treatment, we performed immunostaining to label Hensen cells with brain lipid binding protein (BLBP), also called fatty acid binding protein 7 (Saino-Saito et al., 2010; Chrysostomou et al., 2020), and the cytoplasm of pillar and Deiters’ cells using S100A1 (Coppens et al., 2001; White et al., 2006; McGovern et al., 2018). We observed co-labeling of tdTomato with S100A1 in the second and third row of Deiters’ cells in all explants. (Figures 4A–E’). In the Hensen cell region, the BLBP-positive cells were in close proximity with tdTomato-positive cells (Figures 4F–J’), with some explants (2 out of 7) showed co-labeling of BLBP with tdTomato in some cells. We also used real-time qPCR to confirm our results with the Ahr tdTomato reporter line and found a significant increase in AhR expression in the explants treated with neomycin for 24 h compared to explants treated with media only (Figure 4K).

ATP is increased after treatment with neomycin

Although neomycin uptake occurs primarily in hair cells (Alharazneh et al., 2011; Kitcher et al., 2019; Kim and Ricci, 2022), we observed increased tdTomato expression in neighboring supporting cells, including Hensen and Deiters’ cells. These findings suggest that injured hair cells transmit signals to supporting cells during ototoxin-induced injury. Previous studies have shown that adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) is released from hair cells in response to mechanical injury or neomycin treatment (Lahne and Gale, 2008a, 2010; Cheng et al., 2023). We measured the concentration of ATP in cochlear explants treated with neomycin or media for 24 h using a luciferase-based ATP assay (Figure 5A). In control samples treated with media only (n = 4), ATP levels were low, however, the ATP concentration increased 3-fold in explants treated with neomycin (Figure 5B) (n = 4). These results suggest that neomycin induces significant ATP levels that could be released from hair cells during injury.

AhR expression is increased after treatment with ATP

To further understand if ATP mediates AhR upregulation, we treated explants with 100 μM ATP for 24 h (Figure 6A) and observed an increase in tdTomato expression in Sox2-positive supporting cells (Figures 6B–N’). The tdTomato expression was colocalized with S100A1 in all the explants (6 out of 6) treated with ATP, specifically in the third row of Deiters’ cells (Figures 6H–I’). Immunostaining with BLBP also showed co-labeling with tdTomato suggesting expression of AhR in Hensen cells (Figures 6J–N’). The tdTomato signal was very low in the explants treated with media only (Figures 6B–D’), however 1 out of 6 media treated controls showed a moderate number of tdTomato-positive cells in the basal region. To confirm the requirement of purinergic signaling for AhR upregulation, we co-administered neomycin with the P2 receptor antagonist suramin (1 mM) to AhR tdTomato cochlear explants for 24 h (Figure 7A). No tdTomato expression was seen when suramin was present (Figures 7F–H), suggesting that blockade of purinergic receptors eliminated the damage-induced expression of AhR in supporting cells. Since damaged hair cells release ATP and the AhR expression pattern after treatment with both ATP and neomycin were similar, our findings support a model in which ATP mediates communication between injured hair cells and supporting cells by AhR signaling. (Figure 7I).

AhR expression is increased after noise exposure

Emerging evidence has identified anti-oxidative functions of AhR in different organ systems (Dietrich, 2016; Edamitsu et al., 2022). Given that acoustic trauma significantly elevates reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, (Van Campen et al., 2002; Yamashita et al., 2004; Kurabi et al., 2017; Kühl et al., 2019), we examined the spatiotemporal changes in AhR expression following noise exposure. AhR tdTomato mice were exposed to noise (105 ± 5 dB SPL for 1 h) at 8 weeks of age and examined at 1 h and 24 h post-noise (n = 8). There were no tdTomato-positive cells in the organ of Corti in unexposed controls (Figures 8A–D’). At 1 h after the noise exposure, we observed an increase in tdTomato expression and loss of some outer hair cells (Figures 8E–H’). Unlike explants treated with neomycin, most Sox2-positive supporting cells exhibited tdTomato expression in the noise-exposed cochlea. While hair cell damage was not compared between models, this difference likely results from the distinct experimental conditions. In vivo acoustic trauma induces severe, widespread mechanical and inflammatory stress that drives circulating immune cell infiltration (Hirose et al., 2005; Tornabene et al., 2006; Shin et al., 2022). Conversely, in vitro neomycin treated explants represent a localized chemical insult completely isolated from systemic immune responses, which may limit the secondary cellular stress signals.

At 24 h post-noise exposure, a large number of tdTomato-positive cells were observed in the outer sulcus, lateral to outer hair cells, while tdTomato expression in supporting cells within the organ of Corti was reduced compared to the 1-h timepoint (Figures 8I–L’). Because the cochleae were harvested at acute timepoints (1 and 24 h post-exposure) and previous studies have shown that it takes several days to weeks for hair cells to degenerate and die (Bohne and Harding, 2000; Yamashita et al., 2004; Kujawa and Liberman, 2009; Gratias et al., 2021), we did not quantify the extent of hair cell damage in our samples. However based on previous reports, the noise exposure paradigm that we used should kill less than 5% of outer hair cells (Blum et al., 2024). Notably, the noise-induced changes and the tdTomato expression pattern were observed in all cochlear turns.

Endogenous AhR activity regulates hair cell survival after neomycin exposure

To determine the function of endogenous AhR in the context of neomycin exposure, we deleted AhR from the organ of Corti using Sox2 CreER:AhR loxP/loxP mice that received tamoxifen (3 mg/40 g, IP) at P0. With this age of tamoxifen induction Sox2 CreER is expressed in all supporting cells and the majority of hair cells (Walters et al., 2015; McGovern et al., 2017). First, we confirmed deletion of AhR from the organ of Corti in Sox2 CreER:AhR loxP/loxP mice. We observed a ~ 50% reduction in AhR mRNA levels compared to Cre-negative controls (Figure 9B). This level of reduction is consistent with the CreER line targeting Sox2-positive cells and the presence of Sox2-negative cells in the cochlea. Next, explant cultures were created from Sox2 CreER: AhR loxP/loxP mice and Cre-negative controls at P2 and treated with neomycin or media for 24 h, followed by media washes and further incubation for 24 or 48 h (Figure 9A). We quantified total hair cell numbers and compared numbers between groups. At 24 h post-neomycin exposure, there were no differences in the number of hair cells between the media treated controls (n = 4–5) and the Cre-negative explants treated with neomycin (n = 7–8). However, we observed a significant amount of hair cell loss in the basal turn of the explants with AhR deletion compared to both media treated controls and neomycin treated controls with normal AhR expression (Cre-negative mice) (Figure 9C). At 48 h post-neomycin exposure, we observed a significant loss of hair cells in the middle and basal turns in the neomycin treated Cre-negative explants with normal AhR expression compared to media treated controls. For Sox2 CreER: AhR loxP/loxP explants, there was a significant decrease in hair cell numbers in the middle turn compared to media treated controls. In the basal turn, we found a larger amount of hair cell loss after neomycin treatment in the explants with AhR deletion compared to both media treated controls and neomycin treated explants with normal AhR expression (Cre-negative mice) (Figure 9D).

4. Discussion

Here we provide the first report of the expression pattern of AhR in the cochlea. Under normal conditions, AhR expression was very low in the organ of Corti in all cochlear turns at the postnatal ages we examined, however, robust expression was observed in Schwann cells and satellite glial cells surrounding spiral ganglion neurons at P0. At 8 weeks of age, AhR expression became a mosaic pattern in these glia. We also found tdTomato-positive cells beneath the inner hair cell layer, medial to inner border and inner phalangeal cells at both ages. This expression pattern, location and ovoid cellular shape aligns closely with the “unique cell population” identified as nestin-positive cells (Chow et al., 2015; Smeti et al., 2011). In support, nestin expression has been shown to co-localize with AhR expression in granule neurons (De La Parra et al., 2018) and dorsal root ganglion neurons (Halawani et al., 2026).

Multiple RNAseq studies from the neonatal cochlea show that AhR is expressed in non-sensory supporting cells such as Dieters’ cells, Hensen cells, inner pillar cells and inner phalangeal cells under normal conditions (Cai et al., 2015; Kolla et al., 2020). Our observation of low AhR expression measured by the AhR tdTomato reporter mouse line may suggest differences between RNA and protein expression, since there are many posttranslational mechanisms that regulate protein levels (Walters and Cox, 2019). The AhR localization in the cochlea we observed aligns with the established presence of AhR in the CNS and other sensory tissues. Specifically, AhR expression is present in glial populations such as astrocytes (Filbrandt et al., 2004b; Zhou et al., 2021; Sha et al., 2025) and microglia (Zhou et al., 2021; Zähringer et al., 2025). Furthermore, previous reports have demonstrated that AhR regulates myelin gene expression and AhR’s deficiency leads to thinner myelination in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis preclinical model of multiple sclerosis (Shackleford et al., 2018; Rothhammer et al., 2021b).

In the cochlear explants treated with neomycin, AhR expression was increased in a subset of supporting cells specifically in the region medial and lateral to hair cells after 24 h of exposure compared to media treated controls. AhR is traditionally recognized as a transcription factor that senses xenobiotics and environmental toxins (Köhle and Bock, 2007; Bortoli et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019), however, its upregulation in these supporting cells within 24 h of neomycin exposure suggests that AhR acts as a sensor of hair cell injury. Our findings are similar to reports where AhR-positive non-neuronal cells were observed as early as 18 h after traumatic brain injury (Xu et al., 2016). Another study reported that AhR activation was induced during neuronal stress, showing a significant increase in phosphorylated AhR-positive astrocytes and microglia (Zhou et al., 2021). The physiological functions of AhR in the CNS is demonstrated by studies where disrupting expression of AhR decreased cell survival and neuronal differentiation (Latchney et al., 2013b). In injury and neuroinflammatory contexts, astrocytic AhR limits excessive NF-κB-driven signaling thereby reducing inflammation and contributing to neuronal survival (Vogel et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2015; Ojo and Tischkau, 2021, 2025; Guo et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2026b).

It is well-established that hair cell damage causes a rise in intracellular calcium levels in supporting cells mediated by extracellular ATP (Piazza et al., 2007; Lahne and Gale, 2008a, 2010; Ye et al., 2016; Wood et al., 2024). Supporting cell subtypes such as Deiters’ and Hensen cells express metabotropic purinergic receptors such as P 2 Y 2 (Piazza et al., 2007; Vlajkovic and Thorne, 2022). Extracellular application of ATP to the endolymphatic surface of Hensen cells in the isolated cochlea showed the co-activation of both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. The first and faster inward current was mediated by direct cation influx through ionotropic P2X receptors and the second, slower current was from metabotropic P2Y receptor activation, which triggers an IP3-mediated release of calcium from intracellular stores (Lagostena et al., 2001). In another study, during damage to cochlear explants, slow calcium waves propagated between Deiters’ cells, outer sulcus cells, and Kolliker’s organ and faster waves were observed in a subset of cells in the hair cell region which were mediated by ATP (Lahne and Gale, 2010). Also, in response to neomycin, the purinergic receptor, P2X7R, was upregulated in supporting cells (Cheng et al., 2023). ATP-mediated calcium influx is required for other damage-induced pathways in the cochlea, such as the activation of ERK1/2 in Deiters’ and inner phalangeal cells, which serves to promote wound repair and regulates hair cell survival (Lahne and Gale, 2008b). Similarly, in response to stretch-induced injury in primary cultures of the cortical astrocytes, ERK activation was observed (Neary et al., 2003).

We hypothesize that the mobilization of intracellular calcium in supporting cells, triggered by extracellular ATP released by injured hair cells, acts as the upstream signaling event that couples hair cell injury to the upregulation of AhR in supporting cells (Figure 10). This hypothesis is supported by research across multiple biological systems where increased calcium signaling leads to activation of transcription factors and regulation of gene expression. In neurons, calcium-activated signaling pathways mediate transcription of genes such as bone-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (West et al., 2001). Calcium signals are also known to induce “immediate-early” response genes like c-fos (Cruz-Mendoza et al., 2022). Also, after calcium entry into the cytosol, activation of NF-κB in primary cultures of neonatal cerebellar granule neurons is observed as a downstream sequence (Lilienbaum and Israel, 2003). Studies report that NF-κB directly binds to the AhR promoter to increase AhR mRNA levels in intestinal Caco-2 cells (Champion et al., 2013) suggesting a mechanistic link for how increased calcium signaling acts through NF-κB to upregulate AhR expression. However, this process has not been tested in the cochlea.

The coordinated response of supporting cells to hair cell injury, as evidenced by increased AhR expression in Hensen and Deiters’ cells in our study likely represents a homeostatic or protective response. Our observation of increased hair cell loss upon neomycin treatment in the explants with AhR deletion from the organ of Corti suggests that AhR activation by endogenous ligands reduces neomycin-induced hair cell death. This paracrine signaling we observed is similar to the cochlea’s innate antiviral defense mechanism, where supporting cells and greater epithelial ridge (GER) cells sense viral infection and produce interferon-α/β (IFN-α/β) to activate survival-regulating receptors (Ifnar1/Ifnar2) on the hair cells (Hayashi et al., 2020). In addition, cultured heat-shocked utricles showed protective effects against gentamicin-induced hair cell death compared to non-heat-shocked controls (May et al., 2013). Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms revealed that heat exposure caused supporting cells to upregulate heat shock protein (HSP) 70 that was released in exosomes, and taken up by hair cells through paracrine signaling (Breglio et al., 2020). These findings highlight the role of non-sensory cells acting as homeostatic regulators of injury to mediate the survival of hair cells during stress.

The observation of increased AhR expression in the cochlea at 1 and 24 h following noise exposure suggests that AhR is an early responder in the molecular pathogenesis of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This upregulation is also similar to the early elevation of ROS that occurs upon acoustic trauma (Van Campen et al., 2002; Kurabi et al., 2017; Kühl et al., 2019). Given that ROS accumulation is a primary driver of hair cell apoptosis and permanent hearing loss, we hypothesize that increased AhR expression could be a response from supporting cells to decrease early oxidative damage. Further research into AhR’s function in the cochlea could provide novel insights into otoprotective mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for hearing loss.

In the CNS, AhR deficiency enhanced astrocytes’ sensitivity in primary astrocyte culture to LPS-induced inflammatory stimuli (Ojo and Tischkau, 2025) suggesting a role of AhR in astrocytes in limiting neuroinflammation. Given that astrocytes and supporting cells share multiple roles including stress response by ATP-mediated calcium signaling, inflammatory response and homeostasis (Charles et al., 1991; Salter and Hicks, 1994; Gallagher and Salter, 2003; Ceriani et al., 2016; Pang et al., 2022; Cheng et al., 2023; Wood et al., 2024; Han et al., 2025; Ye and Quintana, 2026), it is possible that deletion of AhR from the organ of Corti increased the sensitivity to neomycin-induced hair cell loss as observed in our study (Figure 10). Furthermore, AhR deficient cells are inherently susceptible to inflammation even in the absence of strong stimuli (Ojo and Tischkau, 2025). This suggests that exposure to neomycin in the absence of AhR further increased inflammation and oxidative stress leading to the increased hair cell loss as observed in our experiment.

Overall, this study highlights the expression pattern of AhR at neonatal and adult ages and the dynamic response of AhR after neomycin treatment and noise exposure. Furthermore, this study identifies a unique response of supporting cells by upregulating AhR during hair cell injury that is mediated by ATP signaling. The increased hair cell loss in AhR deficient cochlea suggests endogenous role of AhR to regulate hair cell survival.

Statements

Conflict of interest

BC was a consultant for Turner Scientific, LLC.

The remaining author declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported in part by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (W81XWH-22-1-0674) and a Graduate Women in Science Fellowship to SP. The SIUSOM Research Imaging Facility is supported by a grant from the Office of Naval Research (N00014-15-1-2866)

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics approval

The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

SP: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. BC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Shelley Tischkau for helpful discussion of the manuscript. We also thank all the members of Cox lab for productive research environment.

References

  1. Alharazneh A., Luk L., Huth M., Monfared A., Steyger P. S., Cheng A. G.. (2011). Functional hair cell mechanotransducer channels are required for aminoglycoside ototoxicity. PLoS One 6: e22347. doi:, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022347
  2. Arnold K., Sarkar A., Yram M., Polo J., Bronson R. (2011). Sox2+ adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice. Cell Stem Cell 9, 317 – 329. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.09.001
  3. Bermingham-McDonogh O., Reh T. A. (2011). Regulated reprogramming in the regeneration of sensory receptor cells. Neuron 71, 389 – 405. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.015
  4. Blum K., Schepsky P., Derleder P., Schätzle P., Nasri F., Fischer P.. (2024). Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in C57BL/6 N mice as a function of trauma strength: ribbons are more vulnerable than postsynapses. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 18: 1465216. doi:, doi:10.3389/fncel.2024.1465216
  5. Bohne B. A., Harding G. W. (2000). Degeneration in the cochlea after noise damage: primary versus secondary events. Am. J. Otol. 21, 505 – 509.
  6. Bohne B. A., Ward P. F., Fernandez C. (1976). Irreversible inner ear damage from rock music. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 82: ORL50-9.
  7. Bortoli S., Boutet-Robinet E., Lagadic-Gossmann D., Huc L. (2018). Nrf2 and AhR in metabolic reprogramming after contaminant exposure. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 8, 34 – 41. doi: doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2017.12.001
  8. Breglio A. M., May L. A., Barzik M., Welsh N. C., Francis S. P., Costain T. Q.. (2020). Exosomes mediate sensory hair cell protection in the inner ear. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2657 – 2672. doi:, doi:10.1172/JCI128867
  9. Burbach K. M., Poland A., Bradfield C. A. (1992). Cloning of the ah-receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89, 8185 – 8189. doi:, doi:10.1073/pnas.89.17.8185
  10. Cai T., Jen H.-I., Kang H., Klisch T. J., Zoghbi H. Y., Groves A. K. (2015). Characterization of the transcriptome of nascent hair cells and identification of direct targets of the Atoh1 transcription factor. J. Neurosci. 35, 5870 – 5883. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5083-14.2015
  11. Ceriani F., Pozzan T., Mammano F. (2016). Critical role of ATP-induced ATP release for Ca 2+ signaling in nonsensory cell networks of the developing cochlea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, E7194 – E7201. doi:, doi:10.1073/pnas.1616061113
  12. Champion S., Sauzet C., Bremond P., Benbrahim K., Abraldes J., Seree E.. (2013). Activation of the NF κ B pathway enhances AhR expression in intestinal Caco-2 cells. ISRN Toxicol. 2013, 1 – 7. doi:, doi:10.1155/2013/792452
  13. Charles A. C., Merrill J. E., Dirksen E. R., Sandersont M. J. (1991). Intercellular signaling in glial cells: calcium waves and oscillations in response to mechanical stimulation and glutamate. Neuron 6, 983 – 992. doi:, doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90238-U
  14. Cheng C., Ma J., Lu X., Zhang P., Wang X., Guo L.. (2023). P2X7 receptor is required for the ototoxicity caused by aminoglycoside in developing cochlear hair cells. Neurobiol. Dis. 183: 106176. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106176
  15. Chow C. L., Guo W., Trivedi P., Zhao X., Gubbels S. P. (2015). Characterization of a unique cell population marked by transgene expression in the adult cochlea of nestin-CreER T2 /tdTomato-reporter mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 523, 1474 – 1487. doi:, doi:10.1002/cne.23747
  16. Chrysostomou E., Zhou L., Darcy Y. L., Graves K. A., Doetzlhofer A., Cox B. C. (2020). The notch ligand Jagged1 is required for the formation, maintenance, and survival of Hensen’s cells in the mouse cochlea. J. Neurosci. 40, 9401 – 9413. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1192-20.2020
  17. Coleman B., Rickard N. A., De Silva M. G., Shepherd R. K. (2009). A protocol for cryoembedding the adult guinea pig cochlea for fluorescence immunohistology. J. Neurosci. Methods 176, 144 – 151. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.09.007
  18. Coppens A. G., Kiss R., Heizmann C. W., Schäfer B. W., Poncelet L. (2001). Immunolocalization of the calcium binding S100A1, S100A5 and S100A6 proteins in the dog cochlea during postnatal development. Dev. Brain Res. 126, 191 – 199. doi:, doi:10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00153-X
  19. Coumoul X., Barouki R., Esser C., Haarmann-Stemmann T., Lawrence B. P., Lehmann J.. (2026). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: structure, signaling, physiology and pathology. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 11: 20. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02500-8
  20. Cruz-Mendoza F., Jauregui-Huerta F., Aguilar-Delgadillo A., García-Estrada J., Luquin S. (2022). Immediate early gene c-fos in the brain: focus on glial cells. Brain Sci. 12: 687. doi:, doi:10.3390/brainsci12060687
  21. De La Parra J., Cuartero M. I., Pérez-Ruiz A., García-Culebras A., Martín R., Sánchez-Prieto J.. (2018). AhR deletion promotes aberrant morphogenesis and synaptic activity of adult-generated granule neurons and impairs hippocampus-dependent memory. eNeuro 5: 370. doi:, doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0370-17.2018
  22. Denison M. S., Faber S. C. (2017). And now for something completely different: diversity in ligand-dependent activation of ah receptor responses. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2, 124 – 131. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2017.01.006
  23. Diao X., Shang Q., Guo M., Huang Y., Zhang M., Chen X.. (2025). Structural basis for the ligand-dependent activation of heterodimeric AHR-ARNT complex. Nat. Commun. 16: 1282. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56574-7
  24. Dietrich C. (2016). Antioxidant functions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Stem Cells Int. 2016: 495. doi:, doi:10.1155/2016/7943495
  25. Ding D., Chen G. D., Zhang C., Ye M., Adler H. J., Sharaf R.. (2025). Supporting cell involvement in cochlear damage and repair: novel insights from a quantitative analysis of cyclodextrin-induced ototoxicity in mice. Hear. Res. 459: 109201. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109201
  26. Diny N. L., Schonfeldova B., Shapiro M., Winder M. L., Varsani-Brown S., Stockinger B. (2022). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor contributes to tissue adaptation of intestinal eosinophils in mice. J Exp Med. 219: e20210970. doi: doi:10.1084/jem.20210970
  27. Durrin L. K., Jones P. B. C., Fisher J. M., Galeazzi D. R., Whitlock J. P. (1987). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin receptors regulate transcription of the cytochrome P 1 -450 gene. J. Cell. Biochem. 35, 153 – 160. doi:, doi:10.1002/jcb.240350208
  28. Edamitsu T., Taguchi K., Okuyama R., Yamamoto M. (2022). AHR and NRF2 in skin homeostasis and atopic dermatitis. Antioxidants 11: 227. doi:, doi:10.3390/antiox11020227
  29. Filbrandt C. R., Wu Z., Zlokovic B., Opanashuk L., Gasiewicz T. A. (2004). Presence and functional activity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in isolated murine cerebral vascular endothelial cells and astrocytes. Neurotoxicology 25, 605 – 616. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2003.08.007
  30. Gallagher C. J., Salter M. W. (2003). Differential properties of astrocyte calcium waves mediated by P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors. J. Neurosci. 23, 6728 – 6739. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06728.2003
  31. Gan Y.-L., Lee Y.-H. (2025). Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1/aryl hydrocarbon receptor feedback loop mediates anti-inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated astrocytes to dampen inflammatory neurotoxicity. J. Physiol. Investig. 68, 1 – 10. doi:, doi:10.4103/ejpi.EJPI-D-24-00089
  32. Glowatzki E., Cheng N., Hiel H., Yi E., Tanaka K., Ellis-Davies G. C. R.. (2006). The glutamate-aspartate transporter GLAST mediates glutamate uptake at inner hair cell afferent synapses in the mammalian cochlea. J. Neurosci. 26, 7659 – 7664. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1545-06.2006
  33. Gratias P., Nasr J., Affortit C., Ceccato J.-C., François F., Casas F.. (2021). Impulse noise induced hidden hearing loss, hair cell ciliary changes and oxidative stress in mice. Antioxidants 10: 1880. doi:, doi:10.3390/antiox10121880
  34. Gu Y.-Z., Hogenesch J. B., Bradfield C. A. (2000). The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 519 – 561. doi:, doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.519
  35. Guo Q., Jin Y., Chen X., Ye X., Shen X., Lin M.. (2024). NF-κB in biology and targeted therapy: new insights and translational implications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9: 53. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01757-9
  36. Haile L. M., Kamenov K., Briant P. S., Orji A. U., Steinmetz J. D., Abdoli A.. (2021). Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 397, 996 – 1009. doi:, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00516-X
  37. Halawani D., Wang Y., Li J., Halperin D., Ni H., Estill M.. (2026). AhR inhibition promotes axon regeneration via a stress–growth switch. Nature 653, 1119 – 1129. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10295-z
  38. Han J., Zhang Z., Zhang P., Yu Q., Cheng Q., Lu Z.. (2025). The roles of microglia and astrocytes in neuroinflammation of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 19: 1575453. doi:, doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1575453
  39. Hankinson O. (1995). The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 35, 307 – 40. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515
  40. Hawkins R. D., Bashiardes S., Powder K. E., Sajan S. A., Bhonagiri V., Alvarado D. M.. (2007). Large scale gene expression profiles of regenerating inner ear sensory epithelia. PLoS One 2: e525. doi:, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000525
  41. Hawkins J. E., Johnsson L.-G., Stebbins W. C., Moody D. B., Coombs S. L. (1976). Hearing loss and Cochlear pathology in monkeys after noise exposure. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 81, 337 – 343. doi:, doi:10.3109/00016487609119971
  42. Hayashi Y., Suzuki H., Nakajima W., Uehara I., Tanimura A., Himeda T.. (2020). Cochlear supporting cells function as macrophage-like cells and protect audiosensory receptor hair cells from pathogens. Sci. Rep. 10: 6740. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63654-9
  43. Hirose K., Discolo C. M., Keasler J. R., Ransohoff R. (2005). Mononuclear phagocytes migrate into the murine cochlea after acoustic trauma. J. Comp. Neurol. 489, 180 – 194. doi:, doi:10.1002/cne.20619
  44. Hoffman E. C., Reyes H., Chu F.-F., Sander F., Conley L. H., Brooks B. A.. (1991). Cloning of a factor required for activity of the ah (dioxin) receptor. Science 252, 954 – 958. doi:, doi:10.1126/science.1852076
  45. Hou J.-J., Ma A.-H., Qin Y.-H. (2023). Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in inflammatory bowel disease: insights from gut microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13: 1279172. doi:, doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1279172
  46. Kim J., Ricci A. J. (2022). In vivo real-time imaging reveals megalin as the aminoglycoside gentamicin transporter into cochlea whose inhibition is otoprotective. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119: e2117946119. doi:, doi:10.1073/pnas.2117946119
  47. Kitcher S. R., Kirkwood N. K., Camci E. D., Wu P., Gibson R. M., Redila V. A.. (2019). ORC-13661 protects sensory hair cells from aminoglycoside and cisplatin ototoxicity. JCI Insight 4: 126764. doi:, doi:10.1172/jci.insight.126764
  48. Köhle C., Bock K. W. (2007). Coordinate regulation of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the ah receptor and Nrf2. Biochem. Pharmacol. 73, 1853 – 1862. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.009
  49. Kolla L., Kelly M. C., Mann Z. F., Anaya-Rocha A., Ellis K., Lemons A.. (2020). Characterization of the development of the mouse cochlear epithelium at the single cell level. Nat. Commun. 11: 2389. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16113-y
  50. Kühl A., Dixon A., Hali M., Apawu A. K., Muca A., Sinan M.. (2019). Novel QUEST MRI in vivo measurement of noise-induced oxidative stress in the cochlea. Sci. Rep. 9: 16265. doi:, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52439-4
  51. Kujawa S. G., Liberman M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 29, 14077 – 14085. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
  52. Kurabi A., Keithley E. M., Housley G. D., Ryan A. F., Wong A. C. Y. (2017). Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss. Hear. Res. 349, 129 – 137. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.013
  53. Lagostena L., Ashmore J. F., Kachar B., Mammano F. (2001). Purinergic control of intercellular communication between Hensen’s cells of the guinea-pig cochlea. J. Physiol. 531, 693 – 706. doi:, doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0693h.x
  54. Lahne M., Gale J. E. (2008). Damage-induced activation of ERK1/2 in Cochlear supporting cells is a hair cell death-promoting signal that depends on extracellular ATP and calcium. J. Neurosci. 28, 4918 – 4928. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4914-07.2008
  55. Lahne M., Gale J. E. (2010). Damage-induced cell–cell communication in different cochlear cell types via two distinct ATP-dependent Ca2+ waves. Purinergic Signal 6, 189 – 200. doi:, doi:10.1007/s11302-010-9193-8
  56. Latchney S. E., Hein A. M., O’Banion M. K., DiCicco-Bloom E., Opanashuk L. A. (2013). Deletion or activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor alters adult hippocampal neurogenesis and contextual fear memory. J. Neurochem. 125, 430 – 445. doi:, doi:10.1111/jnc.12130
  57. Lee Y. H., Lin C. H., Hsu P. C., Sun Y. Y., Huang Y. J., Zhuo J. H.. (2015). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects in lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia. Glia 63, 1138 – 1154. doi:, doi:10.1002/glia.22805
  58. Lilienbaum A., Israel A. (2003). From Calcium to NF-κB Signaling Pathways in Neurons. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23, 2680 – 2698. doi: doi:10.1128/MCB.23.8.2680-2698.2003
  59. Linnerbauer M., Wheeler M. A., Quintana F. J. (2020). Astrocyte crosstalk in CNS inflammation. Neuron 108, 608 – 622. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.012
  60. Marinelli L. (2020). Activation mechanism of AhR pathway in intestinal epithelial cells by commensal bacteria. Available online at:
  61. May L. A., Kramarenko I. I., Brandon C. S., Voelkel-Johnson C., Roy S., Truong K.. (2013). Inner ear supporting cells protect hair cells by secreting HSP70. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 3577 – 3587. doi:, doi:10.1172/JCI68480
  62. McGovern M. M., Brancheck J., Grant A. C., Graves K. A., Cox B. C. (2017). Quantitative analysis of supporting cell subtype labeling among CreER lines in the neonatal mouse cochlea. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 18, 227 – 245. doi: doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0598-0
  63. McGovern M. M., Zhou L., Randle M. R., Cox B. C. (2018). Spontaneous hair cell regeneration is prevented by increased notch signaling in supporting cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12: 120. doi:, doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00120
  64. Montgomery S. C., Cox B. C. (2016). Whole mount dissection and immunofluorescence of the adult mouse cochlea. J. Vis. Exp. 1: 53561. doi:, doi:10.3791/53561
  65. Monzack E. L., Cunningham L. L. (2013). Lead roles for supporting actors: critical functions of inner ear supporting cells. Hear. Res. 303, 20 – 29. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.008
  66. Mulero-Navarro S., Fernandez-Salguero P. M. (2016). New trends in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 4: 45. doi:, doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00045
  67. Neary J. T., Kang Y., Willoughby K. A., Ellis E. F. (2003). Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by stretch-induced injury in astrocytes involves extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic receptors. J. Neurosci. 23, 2348 – 2356. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02348.2003
  68. Nebert D. W. (2017). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR): “pioneer member” of the basic-helix/loop/helix per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH/PAS) family of “sensors” of foreign and endogenous signals. Prog. Lipid Res. 67, 38 – 57. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2017.06.001
  69. Nebert D. W., Roe A. L., Dieter M. Z., Solis W. A., Yang Y., Dalton T. P.. (1999). Role of the Aromatic Hydrocarbon Receptor and [Ah] Gene Battery in the Oxidative Stress Response, Cell Cycle Control, and Apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol. 59, 65 – 85. doi: doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00310-x
  70. Nguyen L. P., Bradfield C. A. (2008). The search for endogenous activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 21, 102 – 116. doi:, doi:10.1021/tx7001965
  71. Oesterle E. C., Campbell S., Taylor R. R., Forge A., Hume C. R. (2008). Sox2 and Jagged1 expression in Normal and drug-damaged adult mouse inner ear. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9, 65 – 89. doi:, doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0106-7
  72. Ojo E., Adu T., Aameri R. F. H. A., Tischkau S. A. (2025). AhR regulation of amyloid beta-induced inflammation in astrocyte cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 19: 1618209. doi:, doi:10.3389/fncel.2025.1618209
  73. Ojo E. S., Tischkau S. A. (2021). The role of AhR in the hallmarks of brain aging: friend and foe. Cells 10: 2729. doi:, doi:10.3390/cells10102729
  74. Ojo E., Tischkau S. A. (2025). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor deficiency enhances astrocyte sensitivity to LPS-induced inflammation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 19: 1653109. doi:, doi:10.3389/fncel.2025.1653109
  75. Pang Q.-M., Chen S.-Y., Xu Q.-J., Zhang M., Liang D.-F., Fu S.-P.. (2022). Effects of astrocytes and microglia on neuroinflammation after spinal cord injury and related immunomodulatory strategies. Int. Immunopharmacol. 108: 108754. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108754
  76. Perl K., Shamir R., Avraham K. B. (2018). Computational analysis of mRNA expression profiling in the inner ear reveals candidate transcription factors associated with proliferation, differentiation, and deafness. Hum. Genomics 12: 30. doi:, doi:10.1186/s40246-018-0161-7
  77. Petersen S. L., Curran M. A., Marconi S. A., Carpenter C. D., Lubbers L. S., McAbee M. D. (2000). Distribution of mRNAs encoding the arylhydrocarbon receptor, arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, and arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-2 in the rat brain and brainstem. J. Comp. Neurol. 427, 428 – 439. doi:, doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20001120)427:3<428::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-P
  78. Pfaffl M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 45e – 445e. doi:, doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
  79. Piazza V., Ciubotaru C. D., Gale J. E., Mammano F. (2007). Purinergic signalling and intercellular Ca2+ wave propagation in the organ of Corti. Cell Calcium 41, 77 – 86. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2006.05.005
  80. Poland A., Glover E., Kende A. S. (1976). Stereospecific, high affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by hepatic cytosol. Evidence that the binding species is receptor for induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 251, 4936 – 4946. doi:, doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(17)33205-2
  81. Pongratz I., Antonsson C., Whitelaw M. L., Poellinger L. (1998). Role of the PAS domain in regulation of dimerization and DNA binding specificity of the dioxin receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4079 – 4088. doi:, doi:10.1128/MCB.18.7.4079
  82. Prasad K., Borre E. D., Dillard L. K., Ayer A., Der C., Bainbridge K. E.. (2024). Priorities for hearing loss prevention and estimates of global cause-specific burdens of hearing loss: a systematic rapid review. Lancet Glob. Health 12, e217 – e225. doi:, doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00514-4
  83. Reyes H., Reisz-Porszasz S., Hankinson O. (1992). Identification of the ah receptor nuclear translocator protein (Arnt) as a component of the DNA binding form of the ah receptor. Science 256, 1193 – 1195. doi:, doi:10.1126/science.256.5060.1193
  84. Riaz F., Pan F., Wei P. (2022). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor: the master regulator of immune responses in allergic diseases. Front. Immunol. 13: 1057555. doi:, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1057555
  85. Rothhammer V., Kenison J. E., Li Z., Tjon E., Takenaka M. C., Chao C.-C.. (2021). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in astrocytes by laquinimod ameliorates autoimmune inflammation in the CNS. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 8: e946. doi:, doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000946
  86. Saino-Saito S., Suzuki R., Tokuda N., Abe H., Kondo H., Owada Y. (2010). Localization of fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) in the cochlea of mice. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 192, 210 – 214. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2010.06.007
  87. Salter M., Hicks J. (1994). ATP-evoked increases in intracellular calcium in neurons and glia from the dorsal spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 14, 1563 – 1575. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-03-01563.1994
  88. Scheffer D. I., Shen J., Corey D. P., Chen Z. Y. (2015). Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during development. J. Neurosci. 35, 6366 – 6380. doi:, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5126-14.2015
  89. Schulte K. W., Green E., Wilz A., Platten M., Daumke O. (2017). Structural basis for aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated gene activation. Structure 25, 1025 – 1033.e3. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.str.2017.05.008
  90. Sha R., Chen Y., Xu T., Yang G., Xu L., Xie H. Q.. (2025). Astrocytes respond to environment-relevant doses TCDD in a specific manner which is different from the endogenous AhR ligand (FICZ). Environ. Health 3, 392 – 401. doi:, doi:10.1021/envhealth.4c00189
  91. Shackleford G., Sampathkumar N. K., Hichor M., Weill L., Meffre D., Juricek L.. (2018). Involvement of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in myelination and in human nerve sheath tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1319 – E1328. doi:, doi:10.1073/pnas.1715999115
  92. Shin S. H., Jung J., Park H. R., Sim N. S., Choi J. Y., Bae S. H. (2022). The time course of monocytes infiltration after acoustic overstimulation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16: 844480. doi:, doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.844480
  93. Smeti I., Savary E., Capelle V., Hugnot J. P., Uziel A., Zine A. (2011). Expression of candidate markers for stem/progenitor cells in the inner ears of developing and adult GFAP and nestin promoter-GFP transgenic mice. Gene Expr. Patterns 11, 22 – 32. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.gep.2010.08.008
  94. Sun W., Chen P., Xu X.-Y., Zhang J.-Q., Jin W.-L. (2026b). Astrocytes in neuroinflammation and brain cancer. Mol. Biomed. 7: 40. doi:, doi:10.1186/s43556-026-00439-y
  95. Sun J.-X., Huang Y., Zheng J.-J., Xie W.-Q. (2026a). Attenuation of microglial aryl hydrocarbon receptor alters astrocyte activation and chronic pain sensitization in aging. Open Life Sci. 21: 20251261. doi:, doi:10.1515/biol-2025-1261
  96. Szymczak-Workman A. L., Vignali K. M., Vignali D. A. A. (2012). Design and construction of 2A peptide-linked multicistronic vectors. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012: 7876. doi: doi:10.1101/pdb.ip067876
  97. Tornabene S. V., Sato K., Pham L., Billings P., Keithley E. M. (2006). Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hear. Res. 222, 115 – 124. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.004
  98. Van Campen L. E., Murphy W. J., Franks J. R., Mathias P. I., Toraason M. A. (2002). Oxidative DNA damage is associated with intense noise exposure in the rat. Hear Res. 164, 29 – 38. doi: doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00391-4
  99. van den Berg M., Denison M. S., Birnbaum L. S., DeVito M. J., Fiedler H., Falandysz J.. (2013). Polybrominated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls: inclusion in the toxicity equivalency factor concept for dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol. Sci. 133, 197 – 208. doi:, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kft070
  100. Vlajkovic S. M., Thorne P. R. (2022). Purinergic Signalling in the cochlea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23: 14874. doi:, doi:10.3390/ijms232314874
  101. Vogel C. F. A., Khan E. M., Leung P. S. C., Gershwin M. E., Chang W. L. W., Wu D.. (2014). Cross-talk between aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the inflammatory response. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 1866 – 1875. doi:, doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.505578
  102. Walisser J. A., Glover E., Pande K., Liss A. L., Bradfield C. A. (2005). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent liver development and hepatotoxicity are mediated by different cell types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102, 17858 – 17863. doi: doi:10.1073/pnas.0504757102
  103. Walters B. J., Cox B. C. (2019). Approaches for the study of epigenetic modifications in the inner ear and related tissues. Hear. Res. 376, 69 – 85. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.007
  104. Walters B. J., Yamashita T., Zuo J. (2015). Sox2-CreER mice are useful for fate mapping of mature, but not neonatal, cochlear supporting cells in hair cell regeneration studies. Sci. Rep. 5: 621. doi:, doi:10.1038/srep11621
  105. Wan G., Corfas G., Stone J. S. (2013). Inner ear supporting cells: rethinking the silent majority. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 448 – 459. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.03.009
  106. West A. E., Chen W. G., Dalva M. B., Dolmetsch R. E., Kornhauser J. M., Shaywitz A. J.. (2001). Calcium regulation of neuronal gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 11024 – 11031. doi:, doi:10.1073/pnas.191352298
  107. White P. M., Doetzlhofer A., Lee Y. S., Groves A. K., Segil N. (2006). Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441, 984 – 987. doi:, doi:10.1038/nature04849
  108. Williamson M. A. (2004). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression and activity in cerebellar granule neuroblasts: implications for development and dioxin neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 83, 340 – 348. doi:, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi031
  109. Wood M. B., Nowak N., Fuchs P. A. (2024). Damage-evoked signals in cochlear neurons and supporting cells. Front. Neurol. 15: 1361747. doi:, doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1361747
  110. Wright E. J., Pereira De Castro K., Joshi A. D., Elferink C. J. (2017). Canonical and non-canonical aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2, 87 – 92. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2017.01.001
  111. Xu K., Yang Z., Shi R., Luo C., Zhang Z. (2016). Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in rat brain lesions following traumatic brain injury. Diagn. Pathol. 11: 72. doi:, doi:10.1186/s13000-016-0522-2
  112. Yamashita D., Jiang H. Y., Schacht J., Miller J. M. (2004). Delayed production of free radicals following noise exposure. Brain Res. 1019, 201 – 209. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.104
  113. Ye R., Liu J., Jia Z., Wang H., Wang Y., Sun W.. (2016). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) inhibits voltage-sensitive potassium currents in isolated Hensen’s cells and Nifedipine protects against noise-induced hearing loss in Guinea pigs. Med. Sci. Monit. 22, 2006 – 2012. doi:, doi:10.12659/MSM.898150
  114. Ye J., Quintana F. J. (2026). Astrocyte biology in CNS inflammatory diseases: a clinical-translational perspective. Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation 13: e200529. doi:, doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200529
  115. Zähringer A., Morgado I., Erny D., Ingelfinger F., Gawron J., Chatterjee S.. (2025). AhR activation mitigates graft-versus-host disease of the central nervous system by reducing microglial NF-κB signaling. Blood Adv. 9, 2935 – 2952. doi:, doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015000
  116. Zhang C., Li H., Qin L., Ge J., Qi Z., Talukder M.. (2019). Nuclear receptor AHR-mediated xenobiotic detoxification pathway involves in atrazine-induced nephrotoxicity in quail (Coturnix C. coturnix). Environ. Pollut. 253, 889 – 898. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.058
  117. Zhao L.-D., Liu J., Hu Y.-Y., Sun J.-H., Shi-Ming Y. (2008). Supporting cells-a new area in cochlear physiology study. J. Otol., 3, 9 – 17, doi: doi:10.1016/S1672-2930(08)50002-X
  118. Zhou Y., Zhao W.-J., Quan W., Qiao C.-M., Cui C., Hong H.. (2021). Dynamic changes of activated AHR in microglia and astrocytes in the substantia nigra-striatum system in an MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mouse model. Brain Res. Bull. 176, 174 – 183. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.08.013

Citation

Pandey, S. & Cox, B. C. (2026). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is expressed in non-sensory cells in the cochlea and regulates hair cell survival. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, Volume 19. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
19 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Pandey and Cox.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Brandon C. Cox

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0