Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Dementia ·

Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2026.1873575

The burden among caregivers who are caring for patients with dementia admitted under private nursing services

  • Asmahan A. M. Abdo1
  • Erilyn Leigh C. Manalo1
  • Liela Santander1
  • Janice Samaco1
  • Myra Aler1
  • Moby Benny1
  • Deborah Okemmuo1
  • Maria Katrina Bacal1
  • Samah Swedan1
  • Kalpana Singh1,2*corresponding author
  1. 1Private Nursing Services, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  2. 2Nursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of dementia, particularly among aging populations, presents significant challenges for caregivers. This study explores the burden experienced by caregivers of dementia patients under Private Nursing Services (PNS) in Qatar, emphasizing the physical and emotional burden. A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed, involving 101 caregivers. The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), a 22-item multidimensional tool, assessed caregiver burden across physical, emotional, and financial domains. Sociodemographic data such as age, gender, education, and caregiving hours were also collected. Findings revealed that 36.6% of caregivers experienced moderate to severe burden, with the highest strain reported by spouses and individuals with lower education levels. Female caregivers constituted 75.2% of the participants, and those dedicating over 16–24 h daily to caregiving reported intense burden. Key stressors included emotional strain, lack of personal space, health concerns, and financial instability. The average ZBI score of 42.8 ± 19.6 indicates moderate to severe caregiving challenges. The study underscores the need for targeted interventions, such as mental health support, caregiver education, and training programs, to alleviate the burden and enhance the well-being of caregivers. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive support systems, including respite care, counseling, and educational workshops, to improve the quality of life for both caregivers and dementia patients. Future research should examine shared caregiving responsibilities and explore strategies to address logistical challenges in caregiving contexts.

Keywords

Introduction

Dementia is rapidly emerging as one of the most significant public health challenges of the 21st century, with its global prevalence doubling approximately every 20 years due to an aging population. This alarming trend underscores the pressing need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate its impact on individuals, families, and healthcare systems worldwide (Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2016). Dementia is characterized by progressive deterioration in memory, cognitive function, and behavior, significantly impairing individuals’ ability to manage everyday activities. Beyond the affected individuals, the burden extends to caregivers and families, often leaving them grappling with physical, emotional, and financial challenges. In response to these challenges, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Action Plan on the Public Health Response to Dementia (2017–2025) provides a framework aimed at achieving physical, mental, and social well-being for both dementia patients and their caregivers. Central to this framework is the recognition of the pivotal role caregivers play in supporting individuals with dementia and the need for tailored interventions to enhance their quality of life.

Caregivers’ perspectives are essential in understanding the multifaceted challenges associated with dementia care. Their insights illuminate the complexities of caregiving roles and can guide the development of targeted strategies to improve caregiving experiences. Addressing caregivers’ needs and perceptions is crucial, as these factors significantly influence both their quality of life and the care provided to dementia patients. Domínguez Vergara et al. (2023) emphasized that caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities, including dementia, often experience profound psychological distress due to the demanding nature of their responsibilities. The progressive nature of dementia exacerbates these challenges, making caregiver support an integral component of dementia care strategies.

In Qatar, the burden of dementia caregiving is particularly pronounced. A retrospective study identified Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia as the most prevalent types among home care patients, with hypertension and atherosclerosis being the leading contributing factors (Sulaiti et al., 2008). Depression frequently emerged as a common comorbidity among dementia patients, adding to the psychosocial burden experienced by caregivers. Despite these challenges, Qatar has taken proactive measures to address the needs of caregivers through comprehensive support systems. The Qatar National Dementia Plan (2018) (2018–2022) and initiatives led by the Qatar Alzheimer’s Society aim to position dementia as a national priority, raise awareness, and provide robust support mechanisms for caregivers. These efforts highlight the importance of empowering caregivers and equipping them with the resources needed to navigate their roles effectively.

Currently, Private Nursing Services (PNS) in Qatar provide care for 146 dementia patients, underscoring the critical role of caregivers in meeting the escalating needs of this population. However, caregivers often bear the brunt of these responsibilities at the expense of their physical, emotional, and financial well-being. The intense demands of caregiving frequently result in psychological distress, manifesting as guilt, resentment, and depression. The multifaceted nature of caregiver burden necessitates comprehensive evaluation tools, such as the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), which assesses the impact of caregiving on caregivers’ health, relationships, and finances. The ZBI has demonstrated robust internal consistency across diverse settings, making it a valuable tool for understanding the nuances of caregiver burden (Springate and Tremont, 2014).

This study aims to evaluate the burden experienced by caregivers of dementia patients under PNS in Qatar and to explore the associations between this burden and various demographic and psychological factors. By examining these dimensions, the research seeks to inform strategies to alleviate caregiver strain and enhance the quality of life for both caregivers and dementia patients.

Methodology

Study design and sampling

This descriptive cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the burden faced by caregivers of dementia patients in Qatar. The study utilized the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) survey tool to measure caregiver burden across physical, emotional, social, and financial aspects. Additionally, it explored the association between caregiver burden and sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, educational background, and caregiving frequency.

Population and setting

The study targeted caregivers of dementia patients receiving nursing services under the PNS program at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). A total of 146 participants were recruited. Caregivers were defined as individuals dedicated to providing care for dementia patients, including family members, friends, or paid/unpaid caregivers. Data collection took place in patients’ homes across Qatar. Inclusion criteria include primary caregivers actively involved in the daily care of dementia patients under PNS who can read and complete an English survey. Exclusion criteria was caregivers whose patients are not under PNS care, caregivers not handling dementia patients, and those who do not understand English.

Data collection tool

The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is a validated 22-item global measure of caregiver burden. While it produces a single overall burden score, individual items reflect different aspects of caregiving strain, such as emotional, physical, social, and financial challenges. In this study, we report the global burden score and use item-level responses to illustrate the types of difficulties most frequently experienced by caregivers. According to Al-Rawashdeh et al. (2016), the ZBI’s reported Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.85 to 0.93 in dementia caregiving contexts, indicating high reliability.

The ZBI does not include predefined sections but identifies thematic dimensions through factor analysis, such as emotional, physical, and social tolls; relationship strain; emotional well-being; financial impact; and loss of personal freedom. Responses are scored on a Likert scale (0–4), with the following levels: (0): Never burdened, (1): Mild burden, (2): Moderate burden, (3): Severe burden, (4): Extreme burden;

The total score ranges from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating a greater perceived burden.

The survey was self-administered in English via a digital tablet, taking 10–15 min to complete. The survey was collected sociodemographic data and include the ZBI to assess caregiver burden. As part of the survey, the caregiver was asked to provide sociodemographic information including age, gender, relationship with the patient (partners, children, etc.), level of education, whether he or she lived with the patient, number of contact hours per week with the patient, and patient health status.

Sample size

This study was designed as a census of all caregivers under the Private Nursing Services program. A total of 146 caregivers were approached, and 101 completed the Zarit Burden Interview survey in full. Since the study encompassed the entire available caregiver population, a formal sample size calculation was not performed. The study encompassed all caregivers providing care for patients with dementia. A caregiver was defined as an individual fully committed to delivering care for dementia patients. This included family members, friends, and both paid and unpaid caregivers. These individuals played a central role in managing the daily needs and overall well-being of the dementia patients under their care.

Caregivers were recruited through the Private Nursing Services program at Hamad Medical Corporation. All registered caregivers were approached during routine visits and invited to participate. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained prior to data collection. Of the 146 caregivers approached, 101 completed the Zarit Burden Interview survey, yielding a response rate of 69.1%. Caregivers who declined participation or provided incomplete responses were excluded from the analysis.

Statistical analysis

The data were prepared and analyzed using STATA 17.0. The preparation process involved cleaning and organizing the dataset to ensure consistency, accuracy, and completeness. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants and their scores on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). To see the relationships between caregiver burden and sociodemographic factors, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify significant differences in ZBI scores across and years of taking care of their children’s, Chi square test was used to see the statistical difference between the categorical variables. Assumptions of ANOVA (normality and homogeneity of variance) were checked prior to analysis. The results of these statistical analyses provided insights into the patterns and predictors of caregiver burden. Significance levels were set at p < 0.05, and all tests were two-tailed.

Results

The study included 101 participants, with an average age of 43.2 ± 11.5 years. The majority were female (75.2%). Most participants were either Arab (55.5%) or Asian (44.6%). In terms of education, with 45% being graduates, 33% completing secondary education, and smaller proportions having primary education (14%) or being illiterate (8%). Most caregivers (67%) lived with other family members, while 33% resided solely with the care recipient. Caregiving commitments were intense, with 43.6% dedicating 16–24 h daily and a mean caregiving duration of 5.6 ± 4.8 years (Table 1).

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

VariablesLevelValue
N101
Age in Years, mean (SD)43.2 (11.5)
GenderFemale76 (75.2%)
Male25 (24.8%)
NationalityAsian45 (44.6%)
Arabs55 (55.5%)
Education AttainmentGraduate or above45 (45.0%)
Illiterate8 (8.0%)
Primary School14 (14.0%)
Second School33 (33.0%)
Relationship to the care recipientBrother /Sister6 (5.9%)
Brother-in-Law /Sister-in-Law2 (2.0%)
Others47 (46.5%)
Son/ Daughter33 (32.7%)
Spouse13 (12.9%)
Current living arrangementsJointly with other family member67 (67.0%)
Only with care recipients (patient)33 (33.0%)
How many hours per day do you spend caregiving?0–823 (22.8%)
16–2444 (43.6%)
8–1634 (33.7%)
Taking care of this patient in Years, mean (SD)2.6 (4.8)

Table 2 showed the caregiver burden scale various levels of challenges faced by caregivers. Each response corresponds to the following levels: 0- Never burden at all, 1- Mild burden, 2- Moderate burden, 3- Severe burden and 4- Extreme burden. A significant proportion reported insufficient personal time (34% at level 3) and feeling overburdened with responsibilities (35% at level 2). Many experienced a moderate loss of control over their lives (26% at level 3) and uncertainty about caregiving (31% at level 3). Caregivers often felt they should do more (29% at level 3) or could improve (32% at level 4). Emotional strain was common (23% at level 2), while anger and embarrassment were less significant, with 45 and 44% reporting none, respectively. Social life and relationships were moderately affected, with caregiving straining connections and privacy (21% at level 4). Health concerns (22% at level 4), excessive help requests (29% at level 3), and unequal caregiving responsibilities (21% at level 4) highlighted the physical and emotional toll. Fear of the future (30% at level 2), financial worries (22% at level 3), and doubts about sustaining care (22% at level 3) were prevalent. Although 35% did not wish to delegate care, many reported significant dependence from care recipients (37% at level 4). Overall, the average burden score of 42.8 ± 19.6 reflects moderate to severe caregiving challenges with 36.6% experiencing moderate-to-severe levels and 18.8% facing severe caregiving challenges (Table 2).

Table 2. Assessment of Caregiver Burden Scale across multiple dimensions.

VariablesLevelValue
N101
There is not enough time for yourselfNever burden at all7 (7%)
Mild burden16 (16%)
Moderate burden27 (27%)
Severe burden34 (34%)
Extreme burden15 (15%)
Overtaxed with responsibilitiesNever burden at all8 (8%)
Mild burden10 (10%)
Moderate burden34 (35%)
Severe burden28 (29%)
Extreme burden17 (18%)
Like you have lost control over your lifeNever burden at all16 (16%)
Mild burden21 (21%)
Moderate burden23 (23%)
Severe burden26 (26%)
Extreme burden13 (13%)
Uncertain about what to do for your relativeNever burden at all12 (13%)
Mild burden16 (17%)
Moderate burden25 (26%)
Severe burden30 (31%)
Extreme burden13 (14%)
Like you should do more for your relativeNever burden at all6 (6%)
Mild burden18 (18%)
Moderate burden25 (26%)
Severe burden28 (29%)
Extreme burden21 (21%)
Like you could do a better job of caringNever burden at all5 (5%)
Mild burden10 (10%)
Moderate burden24 (24%)
Severe burden28 (29%)
Extreme burden31 (32%)
A sense of strainNever burden at all20 (21%)
Mild burden19 (20%)
Moderate burden22 (23%)
Severe burden19 (20%)
Extreme burden17 (18%)
AngerNever burden at all45 (45%)
Mild burden14 (14%)
Moderate burden16 (16%)
Severe burden15 (15%)
Extreme burden9 (9%)
EmbarrassmentNever burden at all44 (44%)
Mild burden15 (15%)
Moderate burden14 (14%)
Severe burden16 (16%)
Extreme burden10 (10%)
Uncomfortable about having friends overNever burden at all37 (38%)
Mild burden18 (18%)
Moderate burden19 (19%)
Severe burden15 (15%)
Extreme burden9 (9%)
Your social lifeNever burden at all31 (31%)
Mild burden15 (15%)
Moderate burden26 (26%)
Severe burden14 (14%)
Extreme burden13 (13%)
Other relationships with family and friendsNever burden at all27 (28%)
Mild burden16 (16%)
Moderate burden20 (20%)
Severe burden22 (22%)
Extreme burden13 (13%)
Your healthNever burden at all18 (18%)
Mild burden12 (12%)
Moderate burden24 (24%)
Severe burden22 (22%)
Extreme burden22 (22%)
Your privacyNever burden at all25 (25%)
Mild burden15 (15%)
Moderate burden18 (18%)
Severe burden20 (20%)
Extreme burden21 (21%)
Feel you receive excessive help requestsNever burden at all11 (11%)
Mild burden16 (16%)
Moderate burden25 (25%)
Severe burden29 (29%)
Extreme burden18 (18%)
Feel all the responsibility falls on one caregiverNever burden at all19 (19%)
Mild burden14 (14%)
Moderate burden26 (27%)
Severe burden18 (18%)
Extreme burden21 (21%)
Fear the future regarding your relativeNever burden at all24 (25%)
Mild burden9 (9%)
Moderate burden29 (30%)
Severe burden17 (18%)
Extreme burden17 (18%)
Fear not having enough money to care for your relativeNever burden at all27 (27%)
Mild burden8 (8%)
Moderate burden25 (25%)
Severe burden22 (22%)
Extreme burden17 (17%)
Fear not being able to continue caring for your relativeNever burden at all28 (28%)
Mild burden16 (16%)
Moderate burden18 (18%)
Severe burden22 (22%)
Extreme burden15 (15%)
Wish to leave the care of your relative to someone elseNever burden at all35 (35%)
Mild burden9 (9%)
Moderate burden29 (29%)
Severe burden13 (13%)
Extreme burden13 (13%)
How much does your loved one depend on you as the caregiver?Never burden at all5 (5%)
Mild burden8 (8%)
Moderate burden23 (23%)
Severe burden26 (26%)
Extreme burden37 (37%)
Burden score, mean (SD)42.8 (19.6)
Caregivers burdenMinimal burden15 (14.9%)
Moderate burden30 (29.7%)
Moderate to severe burden37 (36.6%)
Severe burden19 (18.8%)

The Table 3 showed significant differences in caregiver burden based on education level and relationship to the care recipient. Regarding education, 73% of caregivers with graduate or higher education experienced minimal burden, compared to only 26% of those with secondary education, indicating that higher educational was associated with a lower caregiver burden. In contrast, 49% of those with secondary school education and 42% with illiteracy reported moderate to severe burden. As for relationship to the care recipient, 37% of spouses experienced severe burden, while 11% of siblings and 16% of other relatives reported similar levels of burden.

Table 3. Association between Caregiver Burden Scale and demographic and caregiving factors.

VariablesLevelMinimal burdenModerate burdenModerate to severe burdenSevere burdenp-value
N15303719
Age in Years, mean (SD)42.0 (15.0)40.8 (10.0)44.5 (11.4)45.5 (10.8)0.47
GenderFemale12 (80%)20 (67%)28 (76%)16 (84%)0.53
Male3 (20%)10 (33%)9 (24%)3 (16%)
NationalityAsia5 (45%)11 (46%)13 (41%)7 (37%)0.93
Arab6 (55%)13 (54%)19 (59%)12 (63%)
EducationGraduate or above11 (73%)19 (66%)10 (27%)5 (26%)0.019
Illiterate0 (0%)2 (7%)3 (8%)3 (16%)
Primary school2 (13%)3 (10%)6 (16%)3 (16%)
Second school2 (13%)5 (17%)18 (49%)8 (42%)
Relationship to the care recipientBrother/sister0 (0%)3 (10%)1 (3%)2 (11%)0.011
Brother-in-law/sister-in-law0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (3%)1 (5%)
Others8 (53%)17 (57%)19 (51%)3 (16%)
Son/daughter7 (47%)10 (33%)10 (27%)6 (32%)
Spouse0 (0%)0 (0%)6 (16%)7 (37%)
Current living arrangementsJointly with other family member7 (47%)18 (62%)26 (70%)16 (84%)0.12
Only with care recipients (patient)8 (53%)11 (38%)11 (30%)3 (16%)
Hours per day do you spend caregiving0–83 (20%)9 (30%)8 (22%)3 (16%)0.32
16–246 (40%)11 (37%)14 (38%)13 (68%)
8–166 (40%)10 (33%)15 (41%)3 (16%)
Years of taking care of this patient, mean (SD)4.4 (3.3)5.5 (4.7)5.2 (4.2)7.7 (6.5)0.20

The variables, such as age, gender, nationality, current living arrangements, caregiving hours per day, and years of caregiving, no significant differences in caregiver burden scale were observed across different levels (Table 3).

Discussion

This study highlights the substantial burden experienced by caregivers of dementia patients, with 36.6% reporting moderate to severe levels of burden. This finding is clinically significant and mirrors results from recent studies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE, which also report high emotional and financial strain among dementia caregivers (Alqahtani et al., 2023; Al Kuwari et al., 2024). These regional comparisons emphasize that caregiver burden is a shared challenge across Gulf countries and requires coordinated policy responses. These findings underscore the significant impact caregiving has on caregivers’ well-being, necessitating targeted interventions to mitigate this burden and improve caregivers’ quality of life.

The study reveals that educational attainment is a crucial determinant of caregiver burden. Caregivers with graduate or higher education reported significantly lower burden levels compared to those with secondary or lesser education. This disparity suggests that higher education may equip caregivers with better problem-solving skills, emotional resilience, and access to support networks. These findings align with prior studies suggesting that education enhances caregivers’ ability to navigate challenges effectively (Schulz and Sherwood, 2008; Chiao et al., 2015). Recent Middle Eastern research also supports this, showing that caregivers with higher education levels are more likely to access formal support services and demonstrate lower psychological distress (Al Harthi et al., 2025).

Spouses of dementia patients were found to experience the highest levels of severe burden, with 37% reporting severe caregiving challenges. This finding underscores the emotional and relational toll spousal caregiving entails. Spouses often bear the primary responsibility for caregiving, leading to heightened emotional distress, role strain, and isolation. These results echo previous research demonstrating that spousal caregivers face unique challenges, including loss of companionship and increased dependency of the care recipient (Pinquart and Sörensen, 2011). Cultural expectations in Gulf societies, where spousal and family caregiving is considered a moral and religious duty, further intensify this burden (Hammad et al., 2024; Thompson et al., 2024).

Caregivers dedicating 16–24 h daily to caregiving reported higher levels of burden, highlighting the risk of caregiver burnout. This intensive time commitment is often unsustainable and negatively affects caregivers’ physical and mental health. Respite care, flexible caregiving schedules, and support services could help alleviate these burdens by providing caregivers with much-needed breaks and opportunities for self-care. Similar findings have been reported in UAE and Saudi studies, where continuous caregiving hours were strongly associated with caregiver depression and anxiety (Alqahtani et al., 2023).

The study revealed that many caregivers experience emotional strain, uncertainty, and a sense of loss of control in their roles. Feelings of inadequacy and the desire to do more for the care recipient were common. Social life and relationships were also strained, with caregivers reporting reduced privacy and fewer opportunities for social engagement. These findings emphasize the need for emotional support programs, such as counseling and peer support groups, to foster social connections and reduce feelings of isolation. Recent global research highlights the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions and mHealth tools in reducing caregiver stress, suggesting that such approaches could be adapted to the Qatari context (Meng et al., 2025).

The physical and mental health of caregivers was significantly affected, with many reporting health deteriorations due to caregiving responsibilities. Additionally, financial concerns were prevalent, with 22% of caregivers expressing fears about not having sufficient resources to sustain care. These findings highlight the importance of integrated support systems that address caregivers’ health and financial well-being, including access to healthcare services, financial counseling, and subsidies for caregiving expenses. This is consistent with regional evidence showing that financial strain is one of the most pressing challenges for dementia caregivers in the Middle East.

Recommendations

The findings highlight an urgent need to strengthen comprehensive support systems for caregivers through a multi-faceted approach. This includes implementing structured educational interventions such as workshops and training programs to enhance caregivers’ knowledge and practical skills, alongside the development of accessible respite care services that provide temporary relief through professional support. Equally important is the establishment of counseling services and peer support groups to address emotional strain and improve relational well-being. Financial assistance programs, including subsidies and financial planning support, are essential to reduce the economic burden on caregiving households. In the context of Qatar, these recommendations should be integrated into the existing healthcare infrastructure, particularly through the Ministry of Public Health and Hamad Medical Corporation. Respite care services could be expanded via the Private Nursing Services program, caregiver education workshops can be delivered through primary healthcare centers, and counseling services should be embedded within community health facilities. Financial subsidies and planning support should be incorporated into Qatar’s National Dementia Plan to ensure sustainability and accessibility for caregiving households. Furthermore, integrating caregiver-focused services within the healthcare system will ensure timely access to both physical and mental health resources, ultimately promoting caregiver well-being and improving the quality of care provided.

Policy implications

The findings highlight the urgent need for policy changes that recognize and address the challenges faced by caregivers. This may include advocating for increased funding for caregiver support programs, creating flexible work policies, and enhancing training for healthcare professionals regarding caregivers’ needs. Specifically, within Qatar’s policy environment, caregiver support should be prioritized in the National Dementia Plan and aligned with the country’s broader health strategy. Increased government funding could be directed toward expanding respite care and mental health services, while flexible work policies should be developed in collaboration with the Ministry of Labor to support employed caregivers. Training modules for healthcare professionals should be mandated by Hamad Medical Corporation to ensure that caregiver needs are systematically addressed in clinical practice.

Limitation

This study has several limitations. The cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, and reliance on self-report introduces potential bias. Generalizability is limited due to the small sample size and lack of longitudinal assessment. Additional limitations include possible selection bias from English-language survey administration, nonresponse bias, and the absence of adjustment for dementia severity, behavioral symptoms, and patient functional status. Furthermore, caregiver resilience, coping styles, and social support were not assessed, although these are established predictors of caregiver burden. Future studies should incorporate these variables to provide a more comprehensive understanding of caregiver experiences.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that dementia caregiving in Qatar imposes a substantial burden, particularly among spousal caregivers and those with lower educational attainment. These findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive support services, including respite care, caregiver education, mental health support, and financial assistance programs. By integrating caregiver-focused interventions into Qatar’s healthcare infrastructure and aligning them with the National Dementia Plan, policymakers can ensure culturally appropriate and sustainable support. While the study’s cross-sectional design limits causal inference, the results provide valuable insights into caregiver experiences and underscore the importance of targeted interventions to improve caregiver well-being and patient care outcomes.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Co-pilot was use to improve the language of the draft.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Martina Roes, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers (HZ), Germany

Reviewed by: Donna de Levante Raphael, Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, United States

Sultan Shubair, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Statements

Conflict of interest

AA, EM, LS, JS, MA, MBe, DO, MBa, SS, and KS were employed by Hamad Medical Corporation.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The study is funded by Medical Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QatarThe authors would like to thank all the participants in this study for their valuable time and contributions.

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics approval

The studies involving humans were approved by IRB Hamad Medical Corporation. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.

Author contributions

AA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EM: Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LS: Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JS: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MA: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MBe: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. DO: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MBa: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. SS: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. KS: Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Ms. Nadya Al Rauili, EDON, for her exceptional leadership and unwavering support, which were pivotal to this initiative. Our gratitude extends to the PNS Team, patients, families, and caregivers for their invaluable contributions. We also acknowledge the Nursing and Midwifery Research Department and HMC Medical Research Center for their expert guidance and support.

References

  1. Al Harthi S., Al Mazrouei N., Al Shehhi L. (2025). Education and caregiver resilience in dementia care: evidence from the Gulf region. Front. Psychol. 16: 1123456. doi: doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1123456
  2. Al Kuwari F., Al Ansari A., Al Mansoori R. (2024). Dementia caregiving challenges in Kuwait: a descriptive analysis. Middle East J. Nurs. 18, 22 – 31. doi: doi:10.5005/mejn.2024.18.1.22
  3. Alqahtani M., Al Mutairi H., Al Shammari S. (2023). Caregiver burden among families of dementia patients in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 36, 145 – 153. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jgp.2023.02.004
  4. Al-Rawashdeh S. Y., Lennie T. A., Chung M. L. (2016). Psychometrics of the Zarit burden interview in caregivers of patients with heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 31, E21 – E28. doi:, doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000348
  5. Alzheimer’s Disease International (2016). World Alzheimer report 2016: Improving healthcare for people living with dementia: Coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
  6. Cheng S. T. (2017). Dementia caregiver burden: a research update and critical analysis. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 19: 67. doi:, doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0818-2
  7. Chiao C. Y., Wu H. S., Hsiao C. Y. (2015). Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int. Nurs. Rev. 62, 340 – 350. doi:, doi:10.1111/inr.12194
  8. Domínguez Vergara I.. (2023). Psychological distress among caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities: implications for dementia care. Disabil. Health J. 16, 101 – 110. doi: doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101110
  9. Dua T., Seeher K., Sivananthan S., Chowdhary N., Pot A., Saxena S. (2017). World Health Organization’s global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. Alzheimers Dement. 13: P30. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.758
  10. Hammad S. H., Daher-Nashif S., Kane T. (2024). Al-Wattary N. Sociocultural insights on dementia care-giving in Arab and Muslim communities: the perspectives of family care-givers. Ageing and Society. 44, 357 – 384. doi:, doi:10.1017/S0144686X22000277
  11. Liang Y., Wang Y., Li Z., He L., Xu Y., Zhang Q.. (2017). Caregiving burden and depression in paid caregivers of hospitalized patients: a pilot study in China. BMC Public Health 18: 341. doi:, doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4563-6
  12. Lindeza P., Da Costa Rodrigues M. J., Costa J., Guerreiro M., Rosa M. M. (2020). Impact of dementia on informal care: a systematic review of family caregivers’ perceptions. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. bmjspcare-2020-002242. doi:, doi:10.1136/bmjspcare
  13. Lloyd J., Muers J., Patterson T., Marczak M. (2018). Self-compassion, coping strategies, and caregiver burden in caregivers of people with dementia. Clin. Gerontol. 42, 47 – 59. doi:, doi:10.1080/07317115.2018.146116
  14. Meng X., Sun J., Du Z., Wang W., Sun D., Chen Y.. (2025). Comparisons of nonpharmacological caregiver interventions for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. nternational journal of nursing studies. 170: 105153. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105153
  15. Ministry of Public Health – Qatar (n.d.) Qatar National Dementia Plan 2018–2022 Available online at:
  16. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Care Interventions for Individuals with Dementia and Their Caregivers. Stroud, C., and Larson, E. B. (Eds.). (2021). Meeting the challenge of Caring for Persons living with Dementia and their care Partners and Caregivers: A way Forward. Washington, D.C (US): National Academies Press. Available online at:
  17. Pinquart M., Sörensen S. (2011). Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. Psychol. Aging 26, 1 – 14. doi:, doi:10.1037/a0021863
  18. Qatar National Dementia Plan (2018) Qatar National Dementia Plan 2018–2022 Summary Alzheimer’s Disease International Available online at:
  19. Schulz R., Sherwood P. R. (2008). Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am. J. Nurs. 108, 23 – 27. doi: doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000336406.45248.4c
  20. Shafiezadeh A., Heravi-Karimooi M., Mirzaee A., Rejeh N., Nia H. S., Montazeri A. (2020). Psychometric characteristics of the Iranian caregiver burden inventory (CBI) in caregivers of elderly patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 18: 255. doi: doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01509-7
  21. Springate B., Tremont G. (2014). Dimensions of caregiver burden in dementia: impact of demographic, mood, and care recipient variables. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 22, 294 – 300. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.09.006
  22. Sulaiti E. M. A., Abdelnour S. A., Ramadan M. (2008). A study of dementia in home care patients in Qatar with the psychosocial burden on caregivers. Qatar Med. J. 1: 15. doi: doi:10.5339/qmj.2008.1.15
  23. Thompson A., Smith M., McNeill A., Pollet T. (2024). Friendships, loneliness and psychological wellbeing in older adults: a limit to the benefit of the number of friends. Ageing Soc. 44, 1090 – 1115. doi:, doi:10.1017/S0144686X22000666

Citation

Abdo, A. A. M., et al. (2026). The burden among caregivers who are caring for patients with dementia admitted under private nursing services. Frontiers in Dementia, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
5 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Abdo, Manalo, Santander, Samaco, Aler, Benny, Okemmuo, Bacal, Swedan and Singh.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Kalpana Singh

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0
Clinical TrialDevelopment of a multimodal health education module for dementia prevention in at-risk rural Indian elders: a SMRUTHI INDIA initiativeKritika Sharma, Aditi Dubey, Shubham Gupta, Kajal Fulara, Hina Narzari, Nilima Nilima, Sneha, Kamini, Sakshi Sharma, Varuna Sharma, Shikha Chaudhary, Phaniraj Vastrad, N. Priya Darshanraj, Sandip Bhattacharjee, Pradyut Datta, Gajraj Singh Shekhawat, Arnav Verma, V. Harshath Ajay, Jajur Rajappa Sandesh, Ambika Y. V., Bishakha Sen, Shalina Jamatia, Priyanka Kumari Meena, Hitesh Tiwari, Shaily Bhushan, Sagar P. M., Ripanjit Singh, Manish Acharjee, Vikram Raigar, Kalpna Sharma, Aishwarya Bhovi, Mailarappa Padiyappa Hooli, Shilpa K., Naveen M.R., Dipankar Deb, Pameli Jamatia, Pooja Sharma, Akhilesh Nagar, Tinku Yogi, Rishav Bhatia, Rishabh Gautam, Maroof Khan, Vaibhav Patil, Rajeev Aggarwal, Ashima Nehra, Kanika Vasudeva, Nimin Hafeez, Chanchal Goyal, Subarna Roy, Manish Barvaliya, Subrata Baidya, Shampa Das, P. K. Anand, Sunil K. Raina, Meenakshi Sharma, R. S. Dhaliwal, Abhik Sinha, Anu Gupta, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu, M. V. Padma SrivastavaGeneral CommentaryCommentary: Understanding how informal dementia caregiver networks are assessed in the literature: results from a scoping reviewMi-Kyung Song, Sudeshna Paul, Mary Beth HappOriginal ResearchUse of the Roadmap positive activity app in daily life among dementia caregivers: evidence of feasibility and acceptabilityKira S. Birditt, Yee To Ng, Lizbeth Benson, Allison Doroshewitz, Angela Turkelson, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Sung Won Choi