Skip to content

Mini Review

Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology ·

Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2026.1909558

Designable features of metal-organic frameworks for diverse gas separation membranes

  • Hye Jeong Son1
  • Chang Soo Lee1*corresponding author
  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising membrane materials for gas separation owing to their tunable pore structures, versatile chemical functionalities, and structural diversity. The ability to precisely control pore apertures, introduce specific functional groups, and integrate MOFs with complementary materials provides unique opportunities to regulate gas sorption and diffusion behavior. These characteristics enable MOFs to overcome the limitations of conventional membrane materials and achieve enhanced separation performance. This review summarizes recent advances in MOF-based gas separation membranes, with particular emphasis on pore size engineering, functional group engineering, and hybridization strategies. The effects of these approaches on molecular sieving, adsorption selectivity, and interfacial compatibility are discussed through representative studies. In addition, recent progress in H 2, CO 2, olefin/paraffin, and O 2 /N 2 separations is highlighted to demonstrate the versatility of MOFs across diverse gas separation applications. Overall, the exceptional tunability and design flexibility of MOFs make them attractive platforms for the development of next-generation high-performance gas separation membranes.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Gas separation is a critical unit operation in the chemical and energy industries, with broad relevance to H2 purification, natural gas sweetening, CO2 separation, air separation, and hydrocarbon separations (Favre, 2026; Baker, 2002). Because many of these processes are highly energy intensive, membrane-based separation has received increasing attention as an attractive alternative to conventional technologies such as distillation, pressure swing adsorption (PSA), and temperature swing adsorption (TSA), owing to its lower energy consumption, smaller carbon footprint, and simpler operation (Gao et al., 2024; Bernardo et al., 2009). However, the performance of conventional polymer membranes is still limited by the intrinsic permeability-selectivity trade-off, as well as issues related to physical aging and plasticization under realistic operating conditions (Ding, 2020; Gorgojo et al., 2014; Shin et al., 2020).

In this context, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a promising class of membrane materials because of their exceptionally high surface area, tunable pore sizes, adjustable organic functionality, architectural flexibility, and thermal and physical stability (Howarth et al., 2016; Qian et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2017). The modular combination of metal nodes and organic linkers enables precise control over both pore structure and chemical environment, making MOFs attractive not only as pure crystalline films but also as fillers in mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) (Yu et al., 2024; Venna et al., 2015; Arjmandi and Pakizeh, 2014). In particular, the designability of MOFs offers opportunities to regulate molecular sieving, adsorption selectivity, and interfacial compatibility in a way that is difficult to achieve with traditional porous materials (Ashtiani et al., 2026; Wang et al., 2016; Bi et al., 2020; Hardian et al., 2024).

Despite these advantages, practical implementation of MOF-based membranes still faces several challenges, including scale-up fabrication, membrane substrate adhesion, defect formation during growth or activation, and stability under humidity, pressure, and gas impurities (Kang and Lee, 2023; Li et al., 2023). For MMMs, poor filler dispersion and interfacial incompatibility can limit the achievable particle loading and reduce separation performance, whereas pure MOF films often suffer from grain-boundary defects and mechanical fragility (Seoane et al., 2015; Tanh Jeazet et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015; Hasan and Coronas, 2024). Accordingly, current research is increasingly focused on strategies such as 2D nanosheet fabrication, pore size tuning, functional group engineering, and hybridization with complementary materials to improve both performance and stability (Yu et al., 2024; Peng et al., 2017; Shu et al., 2020; Li et al., 2026).

In this review, we summarize the designable features of MOFs and their application in gas separation membranes. While several comprehensive reviews have summarized the broad progress of MOF-based membranes, this mini review provides a distinct, target-oriented perspective. Rather than presenting a general overview of recent developments, it focuses on how the designable characteristics of MOFs can be tailored to address the transport requirements and material challenges associated with representative gas separations, including H2, CO2, olefin/paraffin, and O2/N2. By linking structural design strategies with the transport behavior of target gas systems, this review provides insights into the fundamental mechanisms governing selective molecular transport across various membrane architectures. First, the tunability of pore size, functional group engineering, and hybrid membrane design are discussed as key strategies for optimizing separation performance (Luo et al., 2025; Lin et al., 2021; Ahmadian-Alam and Mahdavi, 2021; Liu et al., 2017). An overview of these design strategies and their relationship to representative gas separation applications is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. Then, representative examples of MOF-based membranes for hydrogen separation, carbon dioxide separation, and other challenging gas separations are reviewed, with emphasis on the relationship between structure, interface, and transport behavior (Abdul Hamid et al., 2021; Ockwig and Nenoff, 2007; Ercan et al., 2021; Hou et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020; Ashtiani et al., 2021).

Classification of designable features and target applications in MOF-based membranes.
Figure 1. Classification of designable features and target applications in MOF-based membranes.

2 Designable features of MOFs for gas separation

MOFs are crystalline nanoporous materials distinguished by their high accessible surface area, tunable pore sizes, adjustable organic functionality, architectural flexibility, and thermal and physical stability (Su et al., 2025). These features make MOFs highly attractive for membrane-based gas separations, setting them apart from conventional porous materials such as zeolites and activated carbon (Li et al., 2012). In particular, the modular combination of metal nodes and organic linkers enables precise control over both the structure and chemistry of MOFs, allowing them to be widely applied not only as pure MOF films but also as fillers in MMMs. Recent studies have increasingly focused on ultrathin 2D nanosheets, pore size fine-tuning, and integration with other species as key strategies for improving MOF membrane performance. Representative examples illustrating these design strategies are presented in Figure 2 and discussed in the following sections.

**(a)** Schematic illustration of the preparation of defect-engineered UiO-66/PEGDA MMMs for CO2 separation (Lee et al., 2021), **(b)** Fabrication and gas separation performance of PI-TB/UiO-66-NH2 hybrid membranes (Chen et al., 2022), **(c)** Scheme depicting the preparation process of the CuBDC-GO composite membranes based on assembly strategy (Yang et al., 2019).
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of defect-engineered UiO-66/PEGDA MMMs for CO2 separation (Lee et al., 2021), (b) Fabrication and gas separation performance of PI-TB/UiO-66-NH2 hybrid membranes (Chen et al., 2022), (c) Scheme depicting the preparation process of the CuBDC-GO composite membranes based on assembly strategy (Yang et al., 2019).

2.1 Fine-tuning of pore size

One of the most notable advantages of MOFs is their highly tunable pore size and pore aperture. This can be achieved through various approaches, including linker length variation, ligand composition, metal center selection, framework flexibility, defect engineering, and post-synthetic treatment (Zhu et al., 2021; Choi et al., 2024). For instance, mixed-linker strategies and metal substitution can adjust the effective pore aperture and thereby alter molecular sieving behavior, while guest inclusion or post-functionalization can further narrow pore openings or modulate gas-framework interactions (Lin et al., 2020). Such structural tuning strategies have been widely employed to enhance the separation selectivity of MOF membranes and continue to evolve toward more precise control of the local pore environment.

For example, ammonia-induced treatment can alter the local structure of ZIF-8 and promote a more rigid selective pathway (Choi et al., 2026; An et al., 2021), whereas defect-engineered UiO-66 provides an effective means of simultaneously tuning microporosity and mass transport (Lee et al., 2021). In addition, strategies such as varying linker length, regulating framework interactions, or introducing polymers directly into MOF pore windows, as in the polymer-in-cage approach, allow separation performance to be optimized for target gases while preserving the intrinsic framework structure (Kim et al., 2026). Thus, MOFs should be viewed not simply as porous fillers, but as a platform for designing pore environments tailored to specific gas pairs.

2.2 Functional group engineering

Another major advantage of MOFs is the ability to introduce diverse functional groups into the framework or linker. In particular, polar groups such as amino (-NH2) and carboxyl (-COOH) functionalities are beneficial because they can enhance interactions with acidic gases such as CO2 while simultaneously improving interfacial compatibility with polymer matrices. Ligand functionalization has therefore emerged as an important strategy for regulating both diffusion and sorption behavior, and amine functionalization is especially well known for improving CO2 adsorption affinity and enhancing CO2/CH4 or CO2/N2 separation performance.

Representative studies using amino-functionalized ZIF-8-NH2 and UiO-66-NH2 have shown that hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions with the polymer matrix can suppress interfacial void formation and enable defect-free MMMs even at high filler loadings (Zhao et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2022). In addition, amino groups increase CO2-philic interactions, leading to simultaneous improvements in CO2 permeability and ideal selectivity. For example, in TEPA-functionalized MIL-101(Cr)/Pebax membranes, the grafted amine groups significantly enhanced CO2/CH4 separation performance by increasing affinity toward CO2 (Khoshhal Salestan et al., 2021).

Meanwhile, COOH-functionalized MOFs are effective in promoting interfacial crosslinking with polymers (Xu et al., 2026). In UiO-66-COOH-based MMMs, thermal treatment induced a dual crosslinked network between the polymer and MOF, which enhanced the molecular sieving effect and substantially improved CO2/N2 ideal selectivity. These findings suggest that functional group engineering is not limited to enhancing gas affinity, but also offers an effective route to interfacial stabilization, defect suppression, and polymer chain packing control.

2.3 Hybrid MOF-based membranes with other materials

Although MOFs are promising on their own, their performance and structural stability can be further improved through hybridization with other materials such as graphene oxide (GO), ionic liquids (ILs), and polymers. Recent MOF membrane studies have highlighted integration with other species as an important development direction, since it combines the highly porous structure of MOFs with the mechanical robustness, processability, or selective interactions of other materials.

Among these, GO has emerged as a particularly effective additive for improving dispersion stability and interfacial compatibility in MOF-based membranes. In GO-modified MOF-74/Pebax membranes, GO nanosheets suppressed MOF aggregation and extended the gas diffusion pathway, resulting in markedly improved CO2/N2 ideal selectivity (Feng et al., 2024). Likewise, in GO-assisted assembly of CuBDC nanosheet membranes, GO effectively filled the voids between rigid MOF nanosheets, thereby enhancing membrane continuity and mechanical stability (Yang et al., 2019).

IL/MOF/polymer hybrid systems are also effective in constructing CO2-philic transport pathways. In [EMIM][OAc]/CuBTC/Pebax membranes, incorporation of the IL/MOF composite improved both CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 ideal selectivity, with some membranes even surpassing the Robeson upper bound (Habib et al., 2022).

In addition, crosslinking strategies between polymers and MOFs have been widely used to address interfacial defects and plasticization issues. In Mg-MOF-74/polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) membranes, chemical crosslinking between the MOF surface and polymer chain ends generated an interconnected microporous network, while ionic cross-linked MOF/polymer MMMs effectively suppressed polymer chain mobility and interfacial voids (Tien-Binh et al., 2016; Jo et al., 2024). Collectively, these hybridization strategies combine the molecular sieving properties of MOFs with the interfacial stabilization capabilities of other materials, making them highly important for the development of high-performance MOF-based gas separation membranes.

3 Gas separation using MOF-based membranes

Owing to their highly tunable pore sizes, versatile chemical functionalities, and excellent compatibility with hybrid architectures, MOFs have emerged as one of the most promising classes of membrane materials for gas separation. In particular, the ability to precisely tailor sorption affinity and diffusion pathways through pore size engineering, functional group modification, and integration with complementary materials offers significant advantages for achieving high separation performance. As a result, MOF-based membranes have been extensively investigated for a wide range of gas separations, including H2 purification, CO2 separation, olefin/paraffin separation, and O2/N2 separation. Recent studies have demonstrated that the synergistic combination of molecular sieving, adsorption selectivity, and interfacial engineering can effectively overcome the conventional permeability-selectivity trade-off associated with polymeric membranes.

Before discussing the representative gas separation applications covered in this review, it should be noted that the MOF-based membrane architectures described herein differ fundamentally in membrane configuration, gas transport characteristics, performance metrics, fabrication strategies, and characteristic defect types. Accordingly, although the representative studies are organized according to target gas separations, the membrane architecture is explicitly identified whenever different membrane configurations are discussed to provide a clearer structural context. In addition, because the representative studies were conducted under different experimental conditions, including temperature, pressure, feed composition, membrane thickness, and testing mode, the reported performance values should not be interpreted as direct quantitative comparisons. Instead, they are intended to highlight representative advances in MOF-based membrane design for each target gas separation. To facilitate proper interpretation, the corresponding operating conditions for each study are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1. Summary of gas separation performance for the MOF membranes discussed in this review.

MOF membraneMembrane architectureConditionsGas typePermeance (Permeability) 1SelectivityRef.
ZIF-8@NH3Supported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/N2 Single gas376122Choi et al. (2026)
CuBDC-NO2 nanosheetSupported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/CO2 Single gas1,326266Wu et al. (2024)
H2/CH4 Single gas536
MIL-125Supported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/N2 Single gas61264.9Wang et al. (2022)
H2/CH4 Single gas40.7
CO2/N2 Single gas37138.7
MOF801@MXeneSupported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/CO2 Single gas2,33429.4Li et al. (2022)
CuBDC-GOSupported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/CO2 Mixed gas (1:1)2,86795.1Yang et al. (2019)
Zn2(Bim)4Supported MOF membrane25 °C1 barH2/CO2 Mixed gas (1:1)1,3131084Shu et al. (2022)
PZO/NZIF-8MMM25 °C1 barCO2/N2 Single gas33380Kim et al. (2026)
Pebax/MOF-74(Ni)@GOMMM25 °C2 barCO2/N2 Single gas0.82(64.3)76.96Feng et al. (2024)
a *g*Zn-P-dmbIm/MIL-101MMM25 °C2 barCO2/N2 Single gas70.7(19,157)62.2Li et al. (2025a)
PI/UiO-66-COOHMMM25 °C2 barCO2/N2 Single gas(244)61.9Xu et al. (2026)
PIM-1/MOF-74MMM25 °C2 barCO2/CH4 Single gas(21,000)19.1Tien-Binh et al. (2016)
Pebax/TEPA-MIL-101MMM25 °C4 barCO2/CH4 Single gas19.43 (34.6)46.3Khoshhal Salestan et al. (2021)
PEGDA/UiO-66MMM35 °C1 barCO2/N2 Single gas(470)41Lee et al. (2021)
PI-TB/UiO-66-NH2MMM35 °C1 barCO2/CH4 Single gas6.92(415)25Chen et al. (2022)
CO2/N2 Single gas18.9
O2/N2 Single gas1.54(92.3)4.2
6FDA-DAM-Br/MIL-101(Cr)MMM35 °C1 barH2/CH4 Single gas32.8(1,640)16.9Jo et al. (2024)
H2/N2 Single gas15.4
CO2/CH4 Single gas39.62(1,981)20.5
CO2/N2 Single gas18.6
Pebax/IL/CuBTCMMM35 °C1 barCO2/N2 Single gas(335)176Habib et al. (2022)
Pebax/[BMPyr][TCM]/MOF-177MMM35 °C1 barCO2/N2 Single gas(137)622Habib et al. (2024)
6FBDA/ZIF-8-NH2MMM35 °C4.5 barH2/CH4 Single gas(127.5)141.7Zhao et al. (2024)
CO2/CH4 Single gas(80.8)89.4
PI-Br/ZIF-8-NH2MMM25 °C1 barCO2/CH4 Mixed gas (1:1)77834Song et al. (2023)
6FDA-DAM/AZIF-8MMM35 °C2 barC3H6/C3H8 Single gas(79.4)39.8An et al. (2021)
6FDA-DAM/M-gallateMMM25 °C1.5 barC2H4/C2H6 Single gas(91.9)3.37Chen et al. (2021)
PIM-1/Co-gallateMMM30 °C1 barC3H6/C3H8 Single gas(3552)8.8Wang et al. (2025)
PIM-1/o-CB-ZIF-8MMM25 °C2 barO2/N2 Mixed gas (2:8)19.93(797)8.9Qin et al. (2024)

Permeance values are expressed in gas permeation units (GPU = 10−6cm3(STP)/cm2⋅sec⋅cmHg). Permeability values for dense, homogeneous membranes are enclosed in parentheses and expressed in Barrer (Barrer = 10−10cm3(STP)/cm⋅sec⋅cmHg). The mathematical relationship is defined by P = J × l, where l represents the selective layer thickness.

3.1 Hydrogen separation

Hydrogen separation represents one of the most important applications of MOF-based membranes because the extremely small kinetic diameter of H2 enables efficient molecular sieving through sub-nanometer pores. Recent advances have shown that pore rigidification, stacking engineering, and interfacial stabilization are highly effective approaches for enhancing H2 selectivity.

For example, an ammonia-treated ZIF-8 membrane generated locally rigidified selective pathways, achieving an H2 permeance of 376 gas permeation unit (GPU) and an H2/N2 ideal selectivity of 122.4 (Choi et al., 2026). Similarly, a CuBDC-NO2 nanosheet membrane exploited the controllable stacking behavior of MOF nanosheets to precisely regulate the effective aperture to 0.372 nm, resulting in an H2 permeance of 1,326 GPU together with H2/CO2 and H2/CH4 selectivities of 266 and 536, respectively (Wu et al., 2024). These studies highlight the unique capability of MOFs to precisely tailor pore structures for highly selective H2 sieving.

Hybridization strategies have also demonstrated remarkable effectiveness. A GO-assisted CuBDC nanosheet membrane utilized GO nanosheets to repair inter-nanosheet voids and construct a continuous selective layer, achieving an H2 permeance of 2,867 GPU and an H2/CO2 separation factor of 95.1 (Yang et al., 2019). Likewise, a MOF-801@MXene membrane combined the intrinsic porosity of MOFs with the well-defined nanochannels of MXene, creating additional transport pathways for H2 while suppressing CO2 diffusion, thereby exhibiting an H2 permeance of 2334 GPU and an H2/CO2 ideal selectivity of 29.4 (Li et al., 2022). Furthermore, a soft-solid Zn2(Bim)4/polyamide composite membrane synergistically integrated ordered MOF interlayer channels with the defect-healing effect of a polymer layer, delivering an exceptional H2/CO2 separation factor of 1084 (Shu et al., 2022). In this system, the straight interlayer galleries of Zn2(Bim)4 served as rapid H2 transport pathways, whereas the polyamide layer effectively eliminated non-selective defects and maximized intrinsic molecular sieving performance.

Although Table 1 primarily summarizes representative supported MOF membranes for H2 separation, MMMs have also demonstrated excellent separation performance through interfacial engineering. Interfacial engineering in mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) has also emerged as an important strategy. A fluorinated FZIF-9/6FDA-TFMB MMM exploited the facile functionalization capability of MOFs by introducing -CF3 groups, simultaneously optimizing pore size and MOF/polymer compatibility. Consequently, the membrane achieved an H2 permeability of 159 Barrer and an H2/CH4 ideal selectivity of 295, approaching the 2015 Robeson upper bound (Yao et al., 2026). Returning to supported MOF membranes, a defect-rich MIL-125 Ti-MOF membrane prepared using titanium-oxo clusters utilized defect engineering to regulate adsorption and diffusion characteristics, yielding H2/N2 and H2/CH4 selectivities of 64.9 and 40.7, respectively (Wang et al., 2022). Collectively, these studies demonstrate that precise control of pore architecture and interfacial structure is essential for developing highly selective and highly permeable H2 separation membranes.

3.2 Carbon dioxide separation

Carbon dioxide separation is the most extensively investigated application of MOF-based membranes because the intrinsic characteristics of MOFs, including CO2-philic functionalities, open metal sites, and tunable microporous structures, are highly advantageous for selective CO2 transport. Consequently, defect engineering, functional group modification, interfacial crosslinking, and hybridization with graphene oxide (GO) or ionic liquids (ILs) have been widely explored to improve CO2 permeability and selectivity.

Defect engineering has proven particularly effective for creating rapid and selective CO2 transport pathways. Defect-engineered UiO-66/poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) MMMs introduced additional microporosity and transport channels through framework defects, resulting in a CO2 permeability of 470 Barrer and a CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 41, corresponding to approximately a four-fold increase in permeability compared with the pristine PEGDA membrane (Lee et al., 2021). More recently, a polymer-in-cage strategy exploited the tunable pore windows of high-aspect-ratio NZIF-8 nanoplates to create tortuous diffusion pathways, achieving a CO2 permeance of 333 GPU and a CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 80 (Kim et al., 2026).

Functional group engineering has also been extensively employed to enhance CO2 affinity and MOF/polymer compatibility. Incorporation of amino-functionalized ZIF-8-NH2 into a carboxyl-containing polyimide matrix enabled strong hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions at the interface, allowing defect-free MMM fabrication even at a filler loading of 50 wt% and yielding a CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of 89.4 (Zhao et al., 2024). Similarly, UiO-66-NH2 incorporated into a Tröger’s base polyimide matrix simultaneously enhanced CO2-philic interactions and disrupted polymer chain packing, increasing the CO2 permeability to 415 Barrer while maintaining a CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of 25.0 (Chen et al., 2022). In another example, TEPA-functionalized MIL-101(Cr)/Pebax membranes combined the high surface area of MOFs with the strong CO2 affinity of amine groups, achieving a CO2 permeability of 34.6 Barrer and a CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of 46.3 (Khoshhal Salestan et al., 2021).

COOH-functionalized MOFs have demonstrated particular effectiveness in promoting interfacial crosslinking. In UiO-66-COOH-based MMMs, the MOF acted not only as a porous filler but also as a crosslinking platform, inducing the formation of a polymer-MOF dual-crosslinked network during thermal treatment. This structure yielded a CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 61.9 together with enhanced anti-plasticization stability (Xu et al., 2026). Similarly, Mg-MOF-74/PIM-1 MMMs utilized chemical crosslinking between hydroxyl-functionalized MOFs and polymer chain ends to form interconnected microporous networks, increasing CO2 permeability from 6500 to 21,000 Barrer while simultaneously improving CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity from 12.3 to 19.1 (Tien-Binh et al., 2016). Ionic cross-linked MIL-101(Cr)-based MMMs further demonstrated that MOF functionalization can effectively suppress polymer chain mobility and interfacial defects, resulting in a CO2 permeability of 1981 Barrer (Jo et al., 2024).

Hybridization with other materials has also substantially improved CO2 separation performance. GO-modified MOF-74/Pebax MMMs combined the strong CO2 affinity of MOFs with the diffusion barrier effect of GO nanosheets, achieving a CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 76.96, representing an approximately 197% increase compared with pristine Pebax membranes (Feng et al., 2024). IL/MOF/polymer hybrid membranes have likewise shown exceptional performance. For example, an [EMIM][OAc]/CuBTC/Pebax MMM exploited both the intrinsic porosity of MOFs and the high CO2 solubility of ionic liquids, delivering a CO2 permeability of 335 Barrer and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 176 (Habib et al., 2022). An IL-modified MOF-177/Pebax MMM further achieved a remarkably high CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 622 with a CO2 permeability of 137 Barrer (Habib et al., 2024). Additionally, an amino-functionalized ZIF-8-based MOF-protruding thin-film MMM utilized strong interfacial interactions and high-aspect-ratio fillers to achieve a CO2 permeance of 778 GPU and a CO2/CH4 separation factor of 34 while significantly improving resistance to plasticization and physical aging (Song et al., 2023).

Although Table 1 focuses primarily on representative MMMs for CO2 separation, other membrane architectures have also shown promising performance. In particular, MOF-derived glass membranes have recently attracted considerable attention because they eliminate crystalline grain boundaries while maintain continuous gas transport pathways. As a representative MOF-derived glass membrane, a MIL-101/agZn-P-dmbIm crystal-glass composite membrane combined the high porosity of MOFs with the excellent processability of glass matrices, achieving a CO2 permeability of 19,157 Barrer and a CO2/N2 ideal selectivity of 61.9 under mixed-gas conditions (Li et al., 2025a). Likewise, a topology-engineered ZIF-derived MOF glass membrane partially preserved the pore topology of the crystalline precursor after vitrification, delivering a CO2 permeance of 37,000 GPU and a CO2/N2 separation factor of 14.8 (Li et al., 2025b). These results clearly demonstrate that the structural diversity and design flexibility of MOFs provide powerful opportunities for the development of next-generation CO2 separation membranes.

3.3 Other gas separations

Beyond H2 and CO2 separation, MOF-based membranes have demonstrated significant potential for challenging gas separations such as olefin/paraffin and O2/N2 separations. Because these gas pairs possess very similar molecular sizes and physicochemical properties, precise pore aperture control, adsorption selectivity, and filler-polymer interfacial engineering become particularly important. The structural tunability and functionalization capability of MOFs make them especially attractive for these demanding separations.

For olefin/paraffin separation, defect-engineered AZIF-8 nanoparticles enhanced framework rigidity and molecular sieving precision while simultaneously improving compatibility with polymer matrices. As a result, 6FDA-DAM/AZIF-8 MMMs achieved a C3H6 permeability of 79.4 Barrer and a C3H6/C3H8 ideal selectivity of 39.8 (An et al., 2021). In addition to the MMMs summarized in Table 1, supported MOF membranes have also demonstrated excellent separation performance. Furthermore, layered MOF membranes modified with an ionic liquid/AgBF4 composite combined the uniform pore structure of MOFs with Ag+-mediated facilitated transport, effectively transforming an intrinsically non-selective membrane into an olefin-selective membrane. Consequently, mixed-gas separation factors of 28.8 for C3H6/C3H8 and 12.0 for C2H4/C2H6 were obtained (Yang et al., 2021).

Gallate-based MOFs have also emerged as promising fillers for olefin/paraffin separations. A Ni-gallate/6FDA-DAM MMM utilized moderately confined pores and high ethylene affinity to simultaneously enhance C2H4 permeability and C2H4/C2H6 ideal selectivity beyond the polymer upper bound (Chen et al., 2021). More recently, a Co-gallate/PIM-1 MMM featuring a three-dimensionally interconnected porous framework achieved a C3H6 permeability of 3552 Barrer and a C3H6/C3H8 ideal selectivity of 8.8, corresponding to improvements of 106.5% and 131.6%, respectively, compared with pristine PIM-1 (Wang et al., 2025).

MOF-based membranes have also shown promising performance for air separation. An o-carborane-modified ZIF-8/PIM-1 MMM combined molecular sieving with preferential N2 adsorption inhibition, thereby enhancing O2 diffusion selectivity. The optimized membrane achieved an O2 permeability of 796.5 Barrer and an O2/N2 separation factor of 8.9, surpassing the 2015 Robeson upper bound (Qin et al., 2024). Overall, these studies demonstrate that MOF-based membranes constitute a highly versatile platform capable of addressing a broad spectrum of industrially important gas separations through precise pore engineering, functionalization, and hybridization strategies.

4 Conclusion

MOF-based membranes have developed into one of the most promising platforms for next-generation gas separations because their crystalline and modular structures allow unprecedented control over pore size, pore chemistry, and membrane architecture. As summarized in this review, fine-tuning of pore size, incorporation of functional groups such as amino and carboxyl groups, and hybridization with materials such as GO, ionic liquids, and polymers have all been shown to effectively enhance molecular sieving, interfacial compatibility, and transport selectivity. These strategies have enabled strong performance in hydrogen separation, carbon dioxide capture, and other difficult separations such as olefin/paraffin and O2/N2 systems. At the same time, the practical deployment of MOF membranes will require continued progress in scalable synthesis, defect control, and long-term stability. For pure MOF films, membrane substrate bonding, grain-boundary defects, and mechanical robustness remain major challenges. For MMMs, filler agglomeration, interfacial voids, plasticization, and physical aging continue to limit performance, especially under mixed-gas and high-pressure conditions. Therefore, future progress will likely depend on developing more robust interface-engineering strategies, more scalable fabrication routes, and more realistic testing protocols that better reflect industrial operating environments. Overall, the structural diversity and chemical tunability of MOFs provide a strong foundation for the continued development of high-performance gas separation membranes. With further advances in materials design and process integration, MOF-based membranes are expected to play an increasingly important role in energy-efficient and environmentally relevant separations.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Arash Mollahosseini, National Institute for Nanotechnology (NRC-CNRC), Canada

Reviewed by: Mao Fu, Guizhou Normal University, China

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (RS-2022-NR071737).

Author contributions

HS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

References

  1. Abdul Hamid M. R., Qian Y., Wei R., Li Z., Pan Y., Lai Z. (2021). Polycrystalline metal-organic framework (MOF) membranes for molecular separations: engineering prospects and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 640, 119802. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119802
  2. Ahmadian-Alam L., Mahdavi H. (2021). Fabrication of a novel hybrid poly(amide-co-arylate)/MOF thin film membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration: optimization of membrane separation performance. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 328, 111443. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111443
  3. An H., Cho K. Y., Lyu Q., Chiou D.-S., Nam K. J., Kang D.-Y. (2021). Facile defect engineering of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks towards enhanced C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 separation performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105577. doi:10.1002/adfm.202105577
  4. Arjmandi M., Pakizeh M. (2014). Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with cubic-MOF-5 for improved polyetherimide gas separation membranes: theory and experiment. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20, 3857 – 3868. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.091
  5. Ashtiani S., Sofer Z., Průša F., Friess K. (2021). Molecular-level fabrication of highly selective composite ZIF-8-CNT-PDMS membranes for effective CO 2 /N 2, CO 2 /H 2 and olefin/paraffin separations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 274, 119003. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119003
  6. Ashtiani S., Izák P., Sofer Z., Schneider J., Wu B., Regner J. (2026). Metal-organic framework-enabled mixed matrix membranes: recent breakthroughs, limitations, and interfacial engineering for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. Lett. 6, 100113. doi:10.1016/j.memlet.2026.100113
  7. Baker R. W. (2002). Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 1393 – 1411. doi:10.1021/ie0108088
  8. Bernardo P., Drioli E., Golemme G. (2009). Membrane gas separation: a review/state of the art. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 4638 – 4663. doi:10.1021/ie8019032
  9. Bi X., Zhang Y. a., Zhang F., Zhang S., Wang Z., Jin J. (2020). MOF nanosheet-based mixed matrix membranes with metal–organic coordination interfacial interaction for gas separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 49101 – 49110. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c14639
  10. Chen G., Chen X., Pan Y., Ji Y., Liu G., Jin W. (2021). M-gallate MOF/6FDA-polyimide mixed-matrix membranes for C2H4/C2H6 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 620, 118852. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118852
  11. Chen Z., Hong Z., Wu H., Li C., Jiang Z. (2022). Tröger’s base polyimide hybrid membranes by incorporating UiO-66-NH 2 nanoparticles for gas separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61, 3418 – 3427. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c05048
  12. Choi G. M., Mandal M., Jung H. J., Panda J., Kwon Y. J., Zhang K. (2024). Post-synthetic modifications (PSM)-induced defects in hybrid metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to unleash potential in gas separation membrane applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 201, 95 – 118. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.015
  13. Choi E., Yu S., Kim T., Ji Y., Jeong M. H., Kim M. (2026). Ammonia-Induced metal–organic framework membrane pore tuning for hydrogen separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 65, e2261249. doi:10.1002/anie.2261249
  14. Ding Y. (2020). Perspective on gas separation membrane materials from process economics point of view. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 556 – 568. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05975
  15. Ercan N., Kocyigit C., Durmus A., Kasgoz A. (2021). Cyclic olefin copolymer (COC)-metal organic framework (MOF) mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for H 2 /CO 2 separation. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 95, 104155. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104155
  16. Favre E. (2026). The future of membrane gas separations. J. Membr. Sci. 741, 124995. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124995
  17. Feng L., Zhang Q., Su J., Ma B., Wan Y., Zhong R. (2024). Graphene-oxide-modified metal–organic frameworks embedded in mixed-matrix membranes for highly efficient CO2/N2 separation. Nanomaterials 14, 24. doi:10.3390/nano14010024
  18. Gao J., Song Y., Jia C., Sun L., Wang Y., Wang Y. (2024). A comprehensive review of recent developments and challenges for gas separation membranes based on two-dimensional materials. FlatChem 43, 100594. doi:10.1016/j.flatc.2023.100594
  19. Gorgojo P., Jimenez-Solomon M. F., Livingston A. G. (2014). Polyamide thin film composite membranes on cross-linked polyimide supports: improvement of RO performance via activating solvent. Desalination 344, 181 – 188. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.009
  20. Habib N., Durak O., Zeeshan M., Uzun A., Keskin S. (2022). A novel IL/MOF/polymer mixed matrix membrane having superior CO2/N2 selectivity. J. Membr. Sci. 658, 120712. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120712
  21. Habib N., Tarhanlı I., Senses E., Keskin S., Uzun A. (2024). IL-modified MOF-177 filler boosts the CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of pebax membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 710, 123143. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123143
  22. Hardian R., Jia J., Diaz-Marquez A., Naskar S., Fan D., Shekhah O. (2024). Design of mixed-matrix MOF membranes with asymmetric filler density and intrinsic MOF/polymer compatibility for enhanced molecular sieving. Adv. Mater. 36, 2314206. doi:10.1002/adma.202314206
  23. Hasan M. R., Coronas J. (2024). How can the filler-polymer interaction in mixed matrix membranes be enhanced? ChemPlusChem 89, e202400456. doi:10.1002/cplu.202400456
  24. Hou J., Liu P., Jiang M., Yu L., Li L., Tang Z. (2019). Olefin/paraffin separation through membranes: from mechanisms to critical materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 23489 – 23511. doi:10.1039/C9TA06329C
  25. Howarth A. J., Liu Y., Li P., Li Z., Wang T. C., Hupp J. T. (2016). Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15018. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.18
  26. Jo J. H., Kim K. J., An E. J., Lee J., Jae H., Roh D. (2024). Ionic cross-linked MOF-polymer mixed-matrix membranes for suppressing interfacial defects and plasticization behavior. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 23799 – 23812. doi:10.1021/acsami.3c19071
  27. Kang D.-Y., Lee J. S. (2023). Challenges in developing MOF-based membranes for gas separation. Langmuir 39, 2871 – 2880. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03458
  28. Kang Z., Fan L., Sun D. (2017). Recent advances and challenges of metal–organic framework membranes for gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 10073 – 10091. doi:10.1039/C7TA01142C
  29. Khoshhal Salestan S., Pirzadeh K., Rahimpour A., Abedini R. (2021). Poly (ether-block amide) thin-film membranes containing functionalized MIL-101 MOFs for efficient separation of CO 2 /CH 4. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 105820. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105820
  30. Kim M., Min H. J., Choi M. K., Kim K. C., Kim B., Kang M. (2026). Polymer-in-Cage strategy for pore tuning of high-aspect ratio ZIF nanoplate: toward sub-micrometer-thick large area CO 2 separation membranes. Adv. Sci. 13, e19351. doi:10.1002/advs.202519351
  31. Lee T. H., Ozcan A., Park I., Fan D., Jang J. K., Mileo P. G. M. (2021). Disclosing the role of defect-engineered metal–organic frameworks in mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO 2 separation: a joint experimental-computational exploration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103973. doi:10.1002/adfm.202103973
  32. Li J.-R., Sculley J., Zhou H.-C. (2012). Metal–organic frameworks for separations. Chem. Rev. 112, 869 – 932. doi:10.1021/cr200190s
  33. Li R., Fu X., Liu G., Li J., Zhou G., Liu G. (2022). Room-temperature in situ synthesis of MOF@MXene membrane for efficient hydrogen purification. J. Membr. Sci. 664, 121097. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121097
  34. Li S., Han W., An Q.-F., Yong K.-T., Yin M.-J. (2023). Defect engineering of MOF-based membrane for gas separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2303447. doi:10.1002/adfm.202303447
  35. Li N., Ma C., Wang Z., Li D., Qiao Z., Zhong C. (2025a). Highly porous MOF integrated with coordination polymer glass membrane for efficient CO 2 /N 2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 715, 123453. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123453
  36. Li S., Ma C., Hou J., Yu S., Chen A., Du J. (2025b). Highly porous metal-organic framework glass design and application for gas separation membranes. Nat. Commun. 16, 1622. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56295-x
  37. Li Y., Chen C., Zhao Y., Wu W., Wei Y., Wang H. (2026). Tuning framework flexibility of MOF nanosheet membranes with heteroleptic 2D-3D linkers for H 2 /CO 2 separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 331, 123945. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2026.123945
  38. Lin R.-B., Xiang S., Zhou W., Chen B. (2020). Microporous metal-organic framework materials for gas separation. Chem 6, 337 – 363. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.012
  39. Lin R.-B., Zhang Z., Chen B. (2021). Achieving high performance metal–organic framework materials through pore engineering. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 3362 – 3376. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00328
  40. Liu Y., Ban Y., Yang W. (2017). Microstructural engineering and architectural design of metal–organic framework membranes. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606949. doi:10.1002/adma.201606949
  41. Luo W., Zhang Z., Zhu G., Zhang X., Huang G., Zhou T. (2025). Precise pore regulation strategies for constructing high-performance metal–organic framework (MOF) membranes for gas capture: frontier advances. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 13, 118229. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.118229
  42. Ockwig N. W., Nenoff T. M. (2007). Membranes for hydrogen separation. Chem. Rev. 107, 4078 – 4110. doi:10.1021/cr0501792
  43. Peng Y., Li Y., Ban Y., Yang W. (2017). Two-dimensional metal–organic framework nanosheets for membrane-based gas separation. Angew. Chem. 129, 9889 – 9893. doi:10.1002/ange.201703959
  44. Qian Q., Asinger P. A., Lee M. J., Han G., Mizrahi Rodriguez K., Lin S. (2020). MOF-based membranes for gas separations. Chem. Rev. 120, 8161 – 8266. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00119
  45. Qin Z., Sun Y., Zhang Z., Zhang C., Tang C., Geng C. (2024). Synergistic effect of molecular sieving and adsorption inhibition in MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for efficient O 2 /N 2 separation. Chem. Eng. J. 497, 154615. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.154615
  46. Seoane B., Coronas J., Gascon I., Benavides M. E., Karvan O., Caro J. (2015). Metal–organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: a solution for highly efficient CO 2 capture? Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2421 – 2454. doi:10.1039/C4CS00437J
  47. Shin M. G., Kwon S. J., Park H., Park Y.-I., Lee J.-H. (2020). High-performance and acid-resistant nanofiltration membranes prepared by solvent activation on polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 595, 117590. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117590
  48. Shu L., Xie L.-H., Meng Y., Liu T., Zhao C., Li J.-R. (2020). A thin and high loading two-dimensional MOF nanosheet based mixed-matrix membrane for high permeance nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 603, 118049. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118049
  49. Shu L., Peng Y., Yao R., Song H., Zhu C., Yang W. (2022). Flexible soft-solid metal–organic framework composite membranes for H 2 /CO 2 separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202117577. doi:10.1002/anie.202117577
  50. Song S., Zhao M., Guo Z., Ren Y., Wang J., Liang X. (2023). Mixed matrix composite membranes with MOF-protruding structure for efficient CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 669, 121340. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121340
  51. Su S., Xie H., Hou B., Tang X., Kirlikovali K. O., Ye Z.-M. (2025). Customizable aperture geometry in metal–organic frameworks for kinetic hydrocarbon separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 38647 – 38656. doi:10.1021/jacs.5c13078
  52. Tanh Jeazet H. B., Staudt C., Janiak C. (2012). Metal–organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Dalton Trans. 41, 14003 – 14027. doi:10.1039/C2DT31550E
  53. Tien-Binh N., Vinh-Thang H., Chen X. Y., Rodrigue D., Kaliaguine S. (2016). Crosslinked MOF-polymer to enhance gas separation of mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 520, 941 – 950. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.045
  54. Venna S. R., Lartey M., Li T., Spore A., Kumar S., Nulwala H. B. (2015). Fabrication of MMMs with improved gas separation properties using externally-functionalized MOF particles. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 5014 – 5022. doi:10.1039/C4TA05225K
  55. Wang M., Wang Z., Li N., Liao J., Zhao S., Wang J. (2015). Relationship between polymer–filler interfaces in separation layers and gas transport properties of mixed matrix composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 495, 252 – 268. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.019
  56. Wang Z., Wang D., Zhang S., Hu L., Jin J. (2016). Interfacial design of mixed matrix membranes for improved gas separation performance. Adv. Mater. 28, 3399 – 3405. doi:10.1002/adma.201504982
  57. Wang C., Sun Y., Li L., Krishna R., Ji T., Chen S. (2022). Titanium-Oxo cluster assisted fabrication of a defect-rich Ti-MOF membrane showing versatile gas-separation performance. Angew. Chem. 134, e202203663. doi:10.1002/ange.202203663
  58. Wang X., Chang X., Li D., Wang J., Dong Y., Zhang Y. (2025). High-performance mixed matrix membranes for C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 separation unlocked by a 3D-interconnected metal-organic framework. J. Membr. Sci. 735, 124516. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124516
  59. Wu W., Cai X., Yang X., Wei Y., Ding L., Li L. (2024). Accurate stacking engineering of MOF nanosheets as membranes for precise H2 sieving. Nat. Commun. 15, 10730. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54663-7
  60. Xu T., Jiang Z., Liu P., Chen H., Lan X., Chen D. (2020). Immobilization of oxygen atoms in the pores of microporous metal–organic frameworks for C 2 H 2 separation and purification. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 2911 – 2919. doi:10.1021/acsanm.0c00162
  61. Xu Z., Li D., Han M., Wang L., Lv Z., Gu Z. (2026). Constructing interfacial dual-crosslinked MMMs via UiO-66-COOH in-situ amorphization-driven crosslinking for CO 2 /N 2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 751, 125576. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2026.125576
  62. Yang F., Wu M., Wang Y., Ashtiani S., Jiang H. (2019). A GO-Induced assembly strategy to repair MOF nanosheet-based membrane for efficient H 2 /CO 2 separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 990 – 997. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b19480
  63. Yang K., Ban Y., Yang W. (2021). Layered MOF membranes modified with ionic liquid/AgBF4 composite for olefin/paraffin separation. J. Membr. Sci. 639, 119771. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119771
  64. Yao F., Li Z., Dai Y., Ruan X., Yang X., Jiang X. (2026). Like-compatible-like strategy for high-performance H 2 -Sieving mixed-matrix membranes with intensified filler-polymer interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 36, e12697. doi:10.1002/adfm.202512697
  65. Yu S., Li C., Zhao S., Chai M., Hou J., Lin R. (2024). Recent advances in the interfacial engineering of MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Nanoscale 16, 7716 – 7733. doi:10.1039/D4NR00096J
  66. Zhao Q., Sun Y., Zhang J., Fan F., Li T., He G. (2024). Mixed matrix membranes incorporating amino-functionalized ZIF-8-NH 2 in a carboxylic polyimide for molecularly selective gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 693, 122326. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122326
  67. Zhu C., Peng Y., Yang W. (2021). Modification strategies for metal-organic frameworks targeting at membrane-based gas separations. GCE 2, 17 – 26. doi:10.1016/j.gce.2020.11.005

Citation

Son, H. J. & Lee, C. S. (2026). Designable features of metal-organic frameworks for diverse gas separation membranes. Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
5 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Son and Lee.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Chang Soo Lee

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0