Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Sustainable Cities ·

Volume 8 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.1902431

Cultural identity in rapidly urbanizing cities: the role of public art, urban design, and digital engagement

  • Khaula Alkaabi1*corresponding author
  • Fatmaelzahraa Hussein1
  • Salieu Senghore1
  • Nour Agiel1
  • Sarah Aljaberi1
  1. Department of Geography and Urban Sustainability, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

This study investigates the complementary roles of public art (PA), culturally responsive urban design (UD), and digital public art platforms (PADP) in preserving cultural identity and strengthening national identity in the UAE. Using a quantitative approach informed by postpositivist and constructivist perspectives, a survey of 543 residents (72% under 35 years) examined perceptions of national identity and cultural motifs. Structural Equation Modeling revealed that 81% viewed PA as enhancing pride, while 65% valued PADP for promoting culture. Arabic calligraphy (68%) and natural motifs (74%) were key identity anchors. Public art serves as the primary visual medium, urban design provides the physical setting, and digital platforms extend cultural engagement beyond the built environment. Integrating cultural elements into physical urban landscapes and digital public art platforms can strengthen community belonging.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Public art and urban design are vital for preserving cultural identity, fostering community pride, and maintaining heritage, especially in rapidly modernizing contexts like the UAE (López Reus et al., 2020). As globalization reshapes local cultures, integrating public art into urban spaces helps sustain national identity (Cheung et al., 2021; Kortbek, 2018). Murals, sculptures, and Arabic calligraphy visually reflect cultural heritage and shared values (Gesare, 2024; Patel, 2024), while urban design incorporating traditional motifs and natural elements strengthens community identity (Hammadi, 2017; Kordi and Galal Ahmed, 2023).

Youth represent a pivotal demographic in the preservation and reinterpretation of cultural identity, navigating both digital platforms and global influences (Kiarie, 2024; Zhang et al., 2023). In the UAE, young people increasingly emphasize the importance of embedding traditional elements within contemporary urban planning to maintain a sense of belonging amid rapid modernization (Dubai Culture, 2023; Ozoral, 2024). Moreover, recent studies highlight that community awareness and socio-economic factors significantly influence how residents engage with environmental and social change, underscoring the broader role of public participation in strengthening collective identity and resilience (Alkaabi et al., 2025).

This study examines how public art, urban design, and digital public art platforms collectively contribute to preserving Emirati cultural identity in rapidly urbanizing cities. Digital public art platforms refer to websites, mobile applications, social media, virtual exhibitions, and other digital technologies that facilitate public interaction with cultural artworks. Rather than viewing public art as an isolated artistic intervention, the study conceptualizes it as one component of an integrated urban cultural ecosystem in which urban design shapes the physical experience of place while digital engagement extends cultural interaction beyond physical space. Findings aim to guide planners and policymakers in aligning design with community values to foster identity and pride, offering insights for contexts where tradition and modernity intersect.

The UAE has increasingly integrated public art into urban development strategies as part of broader efforts to strengthen national identity while supporting contemporary urban growth. Major cities such as Abu Dhabi and Dubai have incorporated murals, sculptures, and heritage-inspired artworks into streets, cultural districts, and public spaces to create culturally meaningful urban environments.

Figure 1 illustrates representative examples of public art installations depicting traditional Emirati childhood games, pearl diving, fishing traditions, family relationships, and heritage practices. These artworks communicate collective memory through everyday public spaces and demonstrate how artistic interventions reinforce Emirati identity within rapidly modernizing cities. Although survey respondents evaluated their perceptions of public art generally rather than individual artworks, these installations provide the contextual setting through which residents experience public art across the UAE. Consequently, the visual examples presented in Figure 1 offer an important contextual framework for interpreting the survey findings.

Examples of public art installations in the UAE that reflect efforts to preserve cultural identity through urban design. Sources: <sup>1</sup>The HUNTR (2019), <sup>2</sup>Fitter (2016). Reproduced with permission.
Figure 1. Examples of public art installations in the UAE that reflect efforts to preserve cultural identity through urban design. Sources: 1The HUNTR (2019), 2Fitter (2016). Reproduced with permission.

2 Literature review

2.1 Globalization and youth cultural identity

Globalization and cultural identity are interconnected through trade, social integration, and media (Olivier et al., 2008; Sarungu, 2021). While globalization enables cultural exchange and hybrid identities (Kerubo, 2024), it risks cultural homogenization and language dominance (Kerubo, 2024; Nurullah, 2008; Alfarhan, 2016), as seen in Kazan where English signage has replaced Tatar (Sharafutdinov, 2018). Media and state policies mediate these shifts (Sarungu, 2021).

Youth are especially impacted, developing bicultural identities yet facing identity conflicts (Doku and Asante, 2011; Azhar et al., 2014). Preserving traditions and implementing cultural policies are essential for cultural resilience (Kerubo, 2024; Nurullah, 2008).

Global Citizenship (GC) offers frameworks for navigating these dynamics. Cosmopolitanism emphasizes global morality but may erode local identity (Bosio et al., 2023), while Global Citizenship Education promotes global awareness and respect for cultural diversity (Pittman, 2017; Torres, 2017). Transnationalism suggests GC can enrich rather than diminish heritage (Schattle, 2017).

GC fosters cultural exchange and global awareness, enhancing appreciation of traditions (Kerubo, 2024; Olivier et al., 2008; Wang, 2007; Sarungu, 2021), but may also lead to homogenization and identity conflicts (Kerubo, 2024; Nurullah, 2008; Doku and Asante, 2011; Alfarhan, 2016). Economic pressures can marginalize local traditions, highlighting the need for policies and education that balance GC with cultural preservation (Tabatabaei, 2021; Kerubo, 2024; Nurullah, 2008).

2.2 Global citizenship within the UAE context

The United Arab Emirates presents a distinctive context for Global Citizenship (GC), where international openness is pursued alongside the preservation of national identity and cultural heritage. Home to more than 200 nationalities, the UAE promotes intercultural dialog, tolerance, and social cohesion while emphasizing the importance of Emirati values and traditions (Alnaqbi and Ghazali, 2025). National initiatives, including the UAE’s designation of 2019 as the Year of Tolerance and the UAE Vision 2031, encourage cultural diversity and global engagement without compromising the country’s cultural identity. Rather than viewing global citizenship and national identity as competing concepts, the UAE adopts an integrated approach that promotes participation in a multicultural society while safeguarding local heritage, language, and historical traditions (Ozoral, 2024; Khater et al., 2025).

Within this context, public art and culturally responsive urban design provide important mechanisms for translating Global Citizenship principles into the built environment. Heritage-inspired public artworks, culturally meaningful public spaces, and digitally accessible cultural initiatives enable residents and visitors from diverse cultural backgrounds to engage with Emirati history and values while fostering intercultural understanding. Consequently, public art functions not only as an artistic expression but also as a medium for cultural dialog, civic participation, and heritage education, supporting the UAE’s vision of creating globally connected yet culturally distinctive cities (Dubai Culture, 2023; Department of Culture and Tourism – Abu Dhabi, 2018). This perspective provides an appropriate theoretical foundation for examining how public art, urban design, and digital engagement collectively contribute to preserving cultural identity within rapidly urbanizing and multicultural environments.

2.3 Urban design and community identity

Urban design shapes identity and preserves cultural heritage (Nazari and Özbek, 2023; Oktay and Bala, 2015; Oktay, 2017), integrating tradition with modernization while reinforcing local character. Conservation in Al Muharraq, Bahrain, maintains historical identity alongside urban development (Negri and Lelli, 2022; Yarwood, 2011). Beyond the overall urban form, specific urban design elements—including walkability, streetscapes, public plazas, wayfinding systems, landscape design, and the broader public realm—play an important role in strengthening cultural identity and community belonging. Walkable neighborhoods encourage social interaction and civic engagement, while streetscapes that incorporate local architectural styles, traditional materials, public seating, and native landscaping reinforce a city’s unique cultural character (Gehl, 2011; Carmona et al., 2021). Likewise, public plazas serve as venues for cultural events and social gatherings that foster collective identity, whereas culturally responsive wayfinding systems and heritage signage communicate local history and enhance visitors’ sense of place (Lynch, 1960; Arthur and Passini, 2002). Together, these urban design elements create culturally meaningful public spaces that support both heritage preservation and contemporary urban living (Beatley, 2011).

Regional studies further illustrate this relationship. In Iran, residential quality influences local identity (Valibeigi et al., 2020), while Kuwait’s urban transformation demonstrates the challenge of balancing modernization with cultural preservation (Fabbri, 2020). Gulf cities increasingly embed cultural identity within their master plans (Al-Mohannadi and Furlan, 2018), as illustrated by developments in Saadiyat and Msheireb. In the UAE, interventions such as strategic food truck placements (Alkaabi and Mehmood, 2025) and climate-responsive public space design (Alkaabi et al., 2024) shape socio-cultural experiences and strengthen place identity. Considering identity and character in urban planning is therefore essential for creating distinctive, inclusive, and culturally responsive urban environments (Abusaada and Elshater, 2023).

Public art also fosters community identity, social cohesion, and urban development (Gesare, 2024), serving as a visual cultural narrative and encouraging civic engagement (Umali, 2022). However, tensions exist between image-making and reflecting local identity (McCarthy, 2006), necessitating inclusive planning (Gesare, 2024). In the Arabian Peninsula, public art reinforces identity and heritage (Mounajjed, 2017). Qatar’s Katara Cultural Village demonstrates its role in cultural engagement (Al Suwaidi and Furlan, 2017), while contemporary practices raise questions of identity construction and soft power dynamics in the Gulf (Gray, 2017; Mounajjed, 2017). When combined with heritage preservation, public art fosters vibrant community spaces (Alraouf, 2021).

2.4 Digital engagement and cultural identity

Digital technologies have expanded opportunities for preserving and promoting cultural heritage by extending engagement beyond physical public spaces. Digital heritage includes the use of technologies such as virtual museums, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), QR codes, and online archives to document, interpret, and disseminate cultural assets (UNESCO, 2003; Bekele et al., 2018). These tools enhance public understanding of cultural heritage by providing interactive and accessible experiences, particularly for younger generations, while complementing rather than replacing physical public art and urban environments (Champion, 2015; tom Dieck and Jung, 2017).

Social media and digital platforms also play an increasingly important role in strengthening cultural identity by enabling cultural institutions, artists, and communities to share heritage, promote public art, and encourage civic participation (Giaccardi, 2012; Russo et al., 2010). In the UAE, initiatives led by Dubai Culture and the Department of Culture and Tourism–Abu Dhabi have integrated digital technologies into heritage promotion through virtual exhibitions, digital archives, and interactive cultural experiences, supporting the country’s smart city vision while reinforcing Emirati identity (Dubai Culture, 2023; Department of Culture and Tourism – Abu Dhabi, 2018). Together, public art, urban design, and digital engagement create an integrated cultural ecosystem that enhances community belonging and preserves cultural identity in rapidly urbanizing cities.

2.5 Public art as a tool for cultural preservation

Public art preserves cultural heritage by reinterpreting history and supporting cultural pluralism (Nugroho and Hardilla, 2020; Zitcer and Almanzar, 2019). It embeds local history in public spaces, reinforcing collective memory (Harding, 2003), while quality control ensures accuracy and appreciation (Makukula, 2022). Public interventions protect tangible and intangible heritage (Benhamou, 2013).

Case studies illustrate this role: in Malaysia, public art elevates colonial heritage (Tan and Choy, 2020); in South Africa, it negotiates representation (Marschall, 2010); and in France, it shapes cultural identity in New Towns (Vadelorge, 2020). It also engages youth with heritage through memorials and museum pedagogy (Hannum and Rhodes, 2018). Overall, public art aids heritage reinterpretation, urban regeneration, and community identity (Hall and Robertson, 2001), transforming spaces to reflect local identity (Fleming, 2007) and supporting sustainable cultural continuity (Prawata, 2024).

Public art preserves cultural heritage by reinterpreting historical narratives and promoting cultural pluralism (Nugroho and Hardilla, 2020; Zitcer and Almanzar, 2019). Harding (2003) suggests public art integrates local history into public spaces, reinforcing collective memory. However, quality control is essential to ensure historical accuracy and appreciation (Makukula, 2022). Public interventions are critical for safeguarding tangible and intangible heritage (Benhamou, 2013).

However, gaps remain regarding public art’s impact on UAE youth within globalization. While urban design’s role in cultural identity is studied (Oktay and Bala, 2015; Al-Mohannadi and Furlan, 2018), the links between public art, urban design, and community engagement in the UAE are underexplored. Additionally, the role of digital platforms in amplifying public art’s influence on identity requires further study. This research addresses these gaps by examining how public art and urban design shape national identity among UAE youth, informing future cultural and urban planning.

3 Methodology

3.1 Epistemological assumptions

This study adopts a mixed epistemological approach, integrating postpositivism and constructivism. Postpositivism supports hypothesis testing and correlation analysis, aligning with quantitative methods (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2018).

3.2 Research design

A quantitative, purposive sampling design was employed using an online survey targeting younger UAE residents. The survey assessed perceptions of public art (e.g., Arabic calligraphy, sculptures), urban design (e.g., natural elements), and local identity, measuring their impact on community and national pride (see Figure 1).

In addition to the questionnaire survey, the study incorporated a contextual visual analysis of representative public art installations in the UAE (Figure 1). The selected examples illustrate how Emirati cultural heritage is integrated into contemporary public spaces through murals and public artworks depicting traditional practices, local history, and community values. Although the visual analysis was not quantitatively assessed or directly evaluated by survey participants, it provided contextual support for interpreting the survey findings and strengthened the study through methodological triangulation by complementing the quantitative analysis with qualitative visual evidence.

Six hypotheses were tested regarding the role of public art, urban design, and digital engagement in cultural preservation amid globalization:

  • H1: Public art installations, such as murals and sculptures, enhance the sense of identity and foster community pride within neighborhoods.
  • H2: Younger generations in the UAE view public art as a crucial factor in preserving and promoting their local identity in the face of globalization.
  • H3: Urban design incorporating public art strengthens local identity.
  • H4: Urban planners who incorporate local heritage and landmarks into public art and urban design more effectively safeguard and empower community identity.
  • H5: The UAE community acknowledges public art (PA), urban design (UD), and public art development projects (PADP) as vital contributors to the enhancement, preservation, and shaping of the nation’s cultural heritage and identity.
  • H6: Demographic variables significantly affect how latent factors influence perceptions of national identity.

3.3 Data collection procedure

The online survey (Google Forms) was distributed from October to November 2024, following best practices (Roopa and Rani, 2012). Participants were informed of the study’s purpose, with reminders sent after 2 weeks to improve response rates (Cohen et al., 2019).

3.4 Sampling and participants

A quantitative approach was used for analysis (Williams, 2007). Purposive sampling aligned with the study’s objectives (Bernard, 2006; Lewis and Sheppard, 2006). Of 600 targeted participants, 543 responded (90.5% response rate). Participants were UAE nationals and residents aged 18 + (24.3% male, 75.7% female). Emiratis comprised 83.4%, non-Emiratis 16.6%, with 69.7% aged 18–24. All seven emirates were represented, with the highest from Abu Dhabi (58.6%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the respondents.

MeasureCategoryNumberPercentage (%)
GenderMale11424.3
Female35575.7
Emirate of residenceAbu Dhabi27558.6
Dubai398.3
Sharjah224.7
Ajman122.6
Umm Al-Quwain122.6
Ras Al Khaimah8618.3
Fujairah234.9
Age (years)18–2432769.7
25–346614.1
35–44326.8
45–54337.0
55+112.3
NationalityEmirati39183.4
Non-Emirati7816.6

Although respondents represented all seven emirates, the majority were residents of Abu Dhabi (58.6%). This reflects the concentration of higher education institutions and cultural infrastructure within the capital. Consequently, the findings primarily represent perceptions within Abu Dhabi while offering broader insights into cultural identity across the UAE. The results should therefore be interpreted with appropriate caution when generalizing to the national population.

3.5 Instrument

This quantitative study used an online questionnaire with eight sections and a demographic segment. Informed consent was obtained before collecting demographic data. The survey contained 87 items (excluding demographics), with 67 items measuring eight constructs: Public Art (PA, 6 items), Younger Generation Identity Perception (YGIP, 8 items), Urban Design (UD, 6 items), Public Art Types (PAT, 9 items), Special Urban Design Elements (SUDE, 6 items), Strategies for Preserving Identity (SPI, 10 items), Public Art in Digital Platforms (PADP, 11 items), and Overall Perception and Recommendation (OPR, 11 items). Each section applied targeted measurement instruments to assess relationships between latent and observed variables. A five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was used for all items. Table 2 presents the item distribution across constructs.

Table 2. Reliability analysis and KMO-Bartlett’s test results.

Reliability statistical test
No.VariableNo of itemsCronbach’s alpha (α)
1PA60.889
2YGNI80.818
3UD60.810
4PAT90.911
5SUDE60.838
6SPI100.856
7PADP110.939
8OPR110.890
Total8670.869
KMO and Bartlett’s test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy0.963
Bartlett’s test of sphericityApprox. chi-Square21290.875
df2,211
Sig.<0.001

Bold values indicate the key KMO and Bartlett’s test results, confirming adequate sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.963) and statistical significance (p < 0.001).

3.6 Instrument reliability and validity

A pilot study was conducted to assess the survey’s content validity and reliability. Forty-five of fifty randomly selected participants completed the questionnaire, aligning with Gudmundsdottir and Brock-Utne’s (2010) emphasis on pilot testing to enhance research validity and reliability. The pilot aimed to improve question clarity, relevance, instructions, and response options. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for the Likert-scale items to assess convergent reliability and internal consistency, ensuring the instrument’s reliability (Table 2).

Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis, a preferred method for measurement validation (Cavana et al., 2001, as cited in Li and Setiawan Sanusi, 2023). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.963 (Table 2) indicated excellent sampling adequacy, while Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001) confirmed suitability for factor analysis. These results validated the correlation matrix and construct representation. Additionally, research experts reviewed the questionnaire for construct and content validity, providing feedback on relevance, consistency, and readability, which informed refinements for clarity.

4 Data analysis and results

4.1 Data analysis procedures

This study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) as the primary analytical approach to examine relationships among Public Art (PA), Urban Design (UD), Strategies for Preserving Identity (SPI), and Younger Generation National Identity (YGNI), consistent with the quantitative approach adopted in this study (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2018). Data collected through Google Forms were cleaned in Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS (v29). Preliminary screening addressed missing values (<5%) and potentially problematic response patterns following Roni et al. (2020).

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the measurement model, followed by direct path analysis to test the hypothesized relationships among latent constructs (Schumacker and Lomax, 2016; Byrne, 2016). Model fit was evaluated using established criteria, including CFI and TLI ≥ 0.90, RMSEA and SRMR < 0.08, and standardized regression weights ≥ 0.50 (Byrne, 2016). Relationships were interpreted as small (0.10–0.30), moderate (0.31–0.50), or large (≥0.51) following Pallant (2020).

Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated non-normality of the data. Accordingly, non-parametric tests were applied where appropriate. Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests examined demographic differences in perceptions of Public Art Types (PAT), Specific Urban Design Elements (SUDE), and Public Art in Digital Platforms (PADP). A one-sample Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test assessed overall perceptions and recommendations concerning the contribution of PA, UD, and PADP to UAE culture, heritage, and national identity (UCHNI), as well as perceptions of globalization’s influence on UAE national identity (UNI).

4.2 Confirmatory factor analysis

CFA was conducted on 21 observed variables representing PA, UD, SPI, and YGNI. As illustrated in Figure 2, standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.813, exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.50 (Awang, 2012), while squared multiple correlations ranged from 0.362 to 0.660. Correlations among the latent constructs ranged from 0.580 to 0.758, indicating substantial positive relationships.

CFA of the latent factors scale.
Figure 2. CFA of the latent factors scale.

Model adequacy was assessed using multiple goodness-of-fit indices (Byrne, 2013; Hu and Bentler, 1999; Suhr, 2006; Schumacker and Lomax, 2016; Jain and Jena, 2020; Awang, 2012). As presented in Table 3, the normed chi-square was χ2/df = 3.005, within the acceptable range. Other indices also supported the model fit, including IFI = 0.925, TLI = 0.913, CFI = 0.924, and RMSEA = 0.065. Although the chi-square test was significant (p < 0.001), the combined fit indices indicated an acceptable measurement model.

Table 3. Model fit summary.

A. Model fit summary
CMIN
ModelNPARCMINDFpCMIN/DF
Default model48549.8241830.0003.005
Baseline comparisons
ModelNFIDelta1RFIrho1IFIDelta2TLIrho2CFI
Default model0.8910.8750.9250.9130.924
RMSEA
ModelRMSEALO 90HI 90PCLOSE
Default model0.0650.0590.0720.000

4.3 Structural model and path analysis

To address Research Questions 1, 3, and 4, direct path analysis within SEM examined the effects of PA, UD, and SPI on YGNI (Byrne, 2016). As illustrated in Figure 3, significant positive correlations were observed between PA and YGNI (r = 0.743), UD and YGNI (r = 0.758), and SPI and YGNI (r = 0.626).

Direct path analysis of PA, UD, and SPI’s contributions to YGNI.
Figure 3. Direct path analysis of PA, UD, and SPI’s contributions to YGNI.

The path analysis confirmed that all three constructs significantly predicted YGNI. Urban Design showed the strongest effect (β = 0.40, p < 0.001), followed by Public Art (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) and Strategies for Preserving Identity (β = 0.19, p < 0.001). These findings demonstrate the particularly important roles of culturally responsive urban design and public art in shaping younger generations’ perceptions of national identity in the UAE.

4.4 Demographic differences

Non-parametric analyses were conducted to examine demographic differences in perceptions of PAT, SUDE, and PADP. The Mann–Whitney U test identified a significant gender difference for PAT, with female respondents showing a higher mean rank (242.46) than male respondents (211.76; U = 17,586.00, Z = −2.196, p = 0.033). No significant gender differences were found for SUDE (p = 0.813) or PADP (p = 0.069) (Roni et al., 2020).

The Kruskal–Wallis test showed no significant differences among emirates for PAT (p = 0.118), whereas significant differences were identified for SUDE (T = 22.263, df = 6, p = 0.001) and PADP (T = 13.795, df = 6, p = 0.032). These results indicate that perceptions of specific urban-design elements and digital public-art engagement vary geographically, while perceptions of public-art types are relatively consistent across emirates.

4.5 Overall perceptions, recommendations, and globalization

The one-sample Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test showed strong overall support for the contribution of PA, UD, and PADP to UAE culture, heritage, and national identity. The overall UCHNI measure was statistically significant (N = 469, T = 110,152.5, Z = 18.756, p < 0.001). Respondents supported expanding public-art initiatives that reflect Emirati culture, strengthening the role of urban design in national identity, increasing public-art projects on digital platforms, and integrating public art into educational initiatives.

The globalization analysis was also statistically significant overall (N = 469, T = 109,310.5, Z = 18.503, p < 0.001). Respondents expressed concern that globalization may challenge UAE national identity, particularly among younger generations, while recognizing that public art integrated with culturally responsive urban design can help mitigate these pressures.

5 Discussion

This study applied Global Citizenship (GC) theories to examine the role of PA and UD in enhancing cultural heritage, community identity, and UNI. CFA validated the structural integrity of the PA, UD, YGNI, and SPI. Path analysis supported H1, H3, and H4, showing that PA, UD, and SPI significantly contribute to YGNI in the UAE. This aligns with Prawata (2024) and Al-Mohannadi and Furlan (2018), who argue that blending local heritage with modern infrastructure fosters place identity while adapting to globalization. The findings further indicate that urban planners incorporating heritage into PA and UD effectively preserve community identity among youth. These findings suggest that culturally responsive urban design extends beyond the esthetic enhancement of cities by creating environments where residents encounter and engage with cultural narratives in their daily lives. Through heritage-inspired public spaces, landmarks, and culturally significant urban elements, urban design can counteract the homogenizing effects of globalization by reinforcing local identity while accommodating contemporary urban development. This is particularly relevant in the UAE, where rapid urbanization is balanced with national strategies aimed at preserving Emirati heritage and strengthening social cohesion.

In line with Hannum and Rhodes (2018), results affirm that PA functions as public pedagogy, enhancing heritage education alongside Global Citizenship Education goals promoting respect for cultural diversity (Torres, 2017). Rather than serving solely as decorative features, public artworks become informal learning environments that communicate historical narratives, cultural values, and collective memory to residents and visitors. This educational function is especially important for younger generations, who increasingly experience culture through both physical and digital environments. By integrating public art into everyday urban spaces, municipalities can promote cultural awareness, strengthen civic pride, and encourage greater appreciation of Emirati heritage among diverse communities.

Testing H6, gender analysis showed a significant difference for Public Art Types PAT but not for SUDE or PADP. This aligns with Jalalkamali and Doratli (2022), emphasizing gender considerations in PA and UD to foster inclusive identities. Location analysis showed that emirate of residence significantly influenced perceptions of SUDE and PADP but not PAT, reflecting findings by Duque (2014), Zebracki (2013), and Arefi and Aelbrecht (2022) on the contextual impact of public art. The predominance of Abu Dhabi respondents may partially explain the high levels of agreement regarding public art because Abu Dhabi has invested substantially in cultural infrastructure, including the Louvre Abu Dhabi, Founder’s Memorial, and the Saadiyat Cultural District. These investments illustrate how sustained cultural policies and heritage-focused urban development can positively influence residents’ perceptions of identity and belonging. They also suggest that continued investment in culturally responsive public spaces across all emirates may contribute to more balanced national engagement with Emirati cultural heritage.

Wilcoxon test results confirmed that PA, UD, and PADP significantly enhance and preserve UCHNI, aligning with Mounajjed (2017), McCarthy (2006), and Al Suwaidi and Furlan (2017). Participants expressed satisfaction with existing PA but highlighted the need for more initiatives to strengthen UCHNI, suggesting expanding PA on digital platforms and integrating it into education to unite diverse UAE communities. These findings demonstrate that digital engagement can extend the educational and cultural impact of public art beyond physical locations by increasing accessibility and encouraging wider community participation. Digital public art platforms, virtual exhibitions, and social media initiatives provide additional opportunities for residents, particularly younger generations, to interact with Emirati culture and heritage, supporting lifelong cultural learning and reinforcing national identity in an increasingly digital society.

Regarding GI, participants acknowledged that while UD helps preserve UNI, GI challenges local identity, particularly among youth, echoing Azhar et al. (2014), and Doku and Asante (2011). However, they agreed that integrating PA within UD can help mitigate GI’s impact, emphasizing PA and UD’s essential role in preserving UNI amid globalization. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of adopting an integrated urban development approach that combines public art, culturally responsive urban design, and digital engagement to strengthen cultural resilience. Such an approach aligns with the UAE’s vision of developing globally connected cities while preserving Emirati identity, ensuring that future urban development continues to support both innovation and cultural continuity.

6 Conclusion

This study examines the role of PA and UD in shaping and preserving cultural heritage, community identity, and national identity in primarily Abu Dhabi and other participating emirates. Grounded in global citizenship theories such as Cosmopolitanism, Global Citizenship Education, and Transnationalism, the research investigates how PA and UD contribute to identity formation in a rapidly globalizing context.

The study tested six key hypotheses: PA installations (e.g., murals) enhance community identity (H1); younger generations in the UAE perceive PA as crucial for maintaining local identity amid globalization (H2); integrating PA into UD reinforces local identity (H3); urban planners who incorporate local heritage into PA and design effectively preserve community identity (H4); the UAE community values PA, UD, and PADP as essential for shaping cultural heritage (H5); and demographic variables influence national identity differently (H6).

The findings confirmed H1, H3, and H4, demonstrating that PA, UD, and SPI significantly influence young people’s perceptions of national identity in the UAE. While H2 was also supported, participants expressed concerns about globalization’s negative impact on local culture, aligning with Cosmopolitanism theory, which suggests that global norms can erode local identities (Bosio et al., 2023). The analysis of demographic variables (H6) produced mixed results, with some groups showing significant differences in how PA and UD influence their sense of national identity.

Overall, the study supports the notion that PA, UD, and PADP contribute significantly to preserving and shaping cultural heritage and national identity in the UAE. These insights hold important implications for municipal planning, urban design strategies, and cultural heritage preservation policies. Future research should explore how digital platforms can extend the reach and impact of public art in cultural preservation.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2026.1902431/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Mihai S. Rusu, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania

Reviewed by: Mohamed Ahmed F. Mahdy, Alexandria University, Egypt

Izawati Tukiman, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The publication costs of this article were supported by the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU).

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics approval

The studies involving humans were approved by United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) Social Sciences Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

KA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NA: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SA: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

References

  1. Abusaada H., Elshater A. (2023). Semantic similarities between personality, identity, character, and singularity within the context of the city or urban, neighbourhood, and place in urban planning and design. Int. Plan. Stud. 28, 193 – 217. doi: doi:10.1080/13563475.2023.2205029
  2. Alfarhan I. (2016). English as a global language and the effects on culture and identity. Am. Res. J. Engl. Lit. 1, 1 – 6. doi: doi:10.21694/2378-9026.16010
  3. Alkaabi K., Mehmood K. (2025). “ Strategic placement and sustainable practices: unveiling the impact of food trucks on urban dynamics in the UAE,” in Proceedings of the ICSDI 2024 Volume 1 (Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering), eds. Mansour Y., Subramaniam U., Mustaffa Z., Abdelhadi A., Ezzat M., Abowardah E., vol. 556 (Singapore: Springer). doi: doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8712-8_36
  4. Alkaabi K., Bouhaddioui C., Senghore S., Al Darmaki S. O. (2025). Exploring climate adaptation in UAE residential communities: temperature trends, awareness, and technology adoption. Front. Built Environ. 11: 1602348. doi: doi:10.3389/fbuil.2025.1602348
  5. Alkaabi K., Mehmood K., Hdhaiba S. O. B., Aljaberi S., Alkaabi N. (2024). Effect of thermal environmental factors on female students during summer and spring season: promoting a sustainable campus initiative. Discov. Sustain. 5:49. doi: doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00224-3
  6. Al-Mohannadi A. S., Furlan R. (2018). The practice of city planning and design in the Gulf region: the case of Abu Dhabi, Doha and Manama. ArchNet-IJAR 12, 126 – 145. doi: doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i2.1460
  7. Alnaqbi A. K. M. A., Ghazali M. A. (2025). The Emirati model of cultural pluralism and its vision for global leadership in promoting interfaith understanding and coexistence. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 15, 2513–2522. doi: doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i12/27111
  8. Alraouf A. A. (2021). “ The trilogy of heritage, public art and public spaces: the case of Fire Station art and cultural development, Doha, Qatar,” in Urban Challenges in the Globalizing Middle-East: Social Value of Public Spaces, 87 – 105.
  9. Al Suwaidi M., Furlan R. (2017). The role of public art and culture in new urban environments: the case of Katara Cultural Village in Qatar. Arch. Res. 7, 109 – 122. doi: doi:10.5923/j.arch.20170704.01
  10. Arefi M., Aelbrecht P. (2022). Urban identity, perception, and urban design. Urban Des. Int. 27, 1 – 2. doi: doi:10.1057/s41289-022-00179-9
  11. Arthur P., Passini R. (2002). Wayfinding: People, Signs, and Architecture. McGraw-Hill.
  12. Awang Z. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. 2nd Edn. Alam, Malaysia: UiTM Press.
  13. Azhar Z., Manj Y. N., Hashmi A. H., Riaz F., Ahmed T., Sohail M. M. (2014). Impact of globalization on youth cultural identity. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 5, 2198 – 2210. doi: doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p2198
  14. Beatley T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature Into Urban Design and Planning. Washington, DC, United States: Island Press.
  15. Bekele M. K., Pierdicca R., Frontoni E., Malinverni E. S., Gain J. (2018). A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11, 1 – 36. doi: doi:10.1145/3145534
  16. Benhamou F. (2013). “ Public intervention for cultural heritage: normative issues and tools,” in Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, eds. Ginsburgh V., Throsby D. (Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing), 3 – 16.
  17. Bernard H. R. (2006). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. 4th Edn. Lanham, Maryland, United States: Altamira Press.
  18. Bosio E., Torres C. A., Gaudelli W. (2023). Exploring values and knowledge in global citizenship education: theoretical and empirical insights from scholars worldwide. Prospects 53, 195 – 202. doi: doi:10.1007/s11125-023-09658-5
  19. Byrne B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
  20. Byrne B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd Edn New York: Routledge.
  21. Carmona M., Heath T., Oc T., Tiesdell S. (2021). Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd Edn. Abingdon, United Kingdom, and New York, United States: Routledge.
  22. Cavana R. Y., Delahaye B. L., Sekaran U. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Champion E. (2015). Critical Gaming: Interactive History and Virtual Heritage. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
  24. Cheung M., Smith N., Craven O. (2021). The impacts of public art on cities, places and people’s lives. J. Arts Manag. Law Soc. 52, 37 – 50. doi:, doi:10.1080/10632921.2021.1942361
  25. Cohen A. J., Washington S., Butler C., Kamal P., Patino G., Tresh A.. (2019). Altruistic donation to improve survey responses: a global randomized trial. BMC Res. Notes 12: 113. doi:, doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4146-y
  26. Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd Edn Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  27. Department of Culture and Tourism – Abu Dhabi. (2018). Department of Culture and Tourism – Abu Dhabi Launches Abu Dhabi Culture, A Landmark New Digital Initiative For Arts, Culture and Heritage in the Emirate. Available online at:
  28. Doku P. N., Asante K. O. (2011). Identity: globalization, culture and psychological functioning. J. Hum. Sci. 8, 294 – 301.
  29. Dubai Culture (2023). Public Art Strategy. Available online at: (Accessed 02 March, 2025)
  30. Duque F. (2014). Public art and the making of urban space. City Territ. Archit. 1, 1 – 12. doi:, doi:10.1186/2195-2701-1-4
  31. Fabbri R. (2020). “ Identity lost and found: architecture and identity formation in Kuwait and the Gulf,” in Gulf Cooperation Council Culture and Identities in the New Millennium, eds. Karolak M., Allam N. (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan), 115 – 134.
  32. Fitter V. (2016). Amazing Mural in Al Raha: Take a Closer Look at Al Raha’s Intricate Artwork on Display. Time Out Abu Dhabi. Available online at: (Accessed 02 March, 2025)
  33. Fleming D. (2007). “ Adult immigrant ESL programs in Canada: emerging trends in the contexts of history, economics, and identity,” in International Handbook of English Language Teaching, 185 – 198. doi: doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_14
  34. Gehl J. (2011). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. 6th Edn. Washington, DC, United States: Island Press.
  35. Gesare D. (2024). The role of public art in community identity and urban development. Int. J. Arts Recreat. Sports 3, 14 – 26. doi: doi:10.47941/ijars.2068
  36. Giaccardi E. Ed. (2012). Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
  37. Gray L. (2017). Contemporary art and global identity in the Arabian peninsula and Azerbaijan. J. Arab. Stud. 7, 65 – 83. doi: doi:10.1080/21534764.2017.1356034
  38. Gudmundsdottir G. B., Brock-Utne B. (2010). An exploration of the importance of piloting and access as action research. Educ. Action Res. 18, 359 – 372. doi: doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.499815
  39. Hall T., Robertson I. (2001). Public art and urban regeneration: advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landsc. Res. 26, 5 – 26. doi: doi:10.1080/01426390120024457
  40. Hammadi T. (2017). The role of urban landscape design in enhancing people's outdoor places and spaces. Int. J. Adv. Res. 5, 1084 – 1099. doi: doi:10.21474/IJAR01/5427
  41. Hannum K. L., Rhodes M. A. (2018). Public art as public pedagogy: memorial landscapes of the Cambodian genocide. J. Cult. Geogr. 35, 334 – 361. doi: doi:10.1080/08873631.2018.1430935
  42. Harding S. (2003). Cultural property and the limitations of preservation. Law Policy 25, 17 – 36. doi: doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00138
  43. Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6, 1 – 55. doi: doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  44. Jain R., Jena A. (2020). How to Perform Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Analysis with AMOS? Knowledge Tank; Project Guru. Available online at: (Accessed 02 March, 2025)
  45. Jalalkamali A., Doratli N. (2022). Public space behaviors and intentions: the role of gender through the window of culture, case of Kerman. Behav. Sci. 12: 388. doi:, doi:10.3390/bs12100388
  46. Kerubo C. (2024). The impact of globalization on cultural identity. Int. J. Philos. 3, 58 – 72. doi: doi:10.47941/ijp.2097
  47. Khater M., Al-Leheabi S. M. Z. M., Saad M. A. (2025). National identity: UAE'S blend of heritage and modernity. Int. J. Tour. Anthropol. 10, 85–100. doi: doi:10.1504/IJTA.2025.148674
  48. Kiarie E. (2024). Cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 3, 1 – 14. doi: doi:10.47941/ijhss.2081
  49. Kordi A. O., Galal Ahmed K. (2023). Towards a socially vibrant city: exploring urban typologies and morphologies of the emerging “CityWalks” in Dubai. City Territ. Archit. 10: 34. doi: doi:10.1186/s40410-023-00221-5
  50. Kortbek H. B. (2018). Contradictions in participatory public art: placemaking as an instrument of urban cultural policy. J. Arts Manag. Law Soc. 49, 30 – 44. doi: doi:10.1080/10632921.2018.1473310
  51. Lewis J. L., Sheppard S. R. J. (2006). Culture and communication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landsc. Urban Plan. 77, 291 – 313. doi: doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.004
  52. Li S., Setiawan Sanusi E. (2023). Entrepreneurial motivations and business performance: a study of female online microbusiness owners. PLOS One 18. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289946
  53. López Reus E., El Amrousi M., Paleologos E. K. (2020). Modern heritage and the living city: Arab identity and modernization in the architecture of Abu Dhabi. J. Arab. Stud. 10, 90 – 115. doi: doi:10.1080/21534764.2020.1791362
  54. Lynch K. (1960). The Image of the city. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: MIT Press.
  55. Makukula D. Z. (2022). 12 chiefs with the same face: a formal analysis of the Maji Maji war heroes’ statues. UMMA J. Contemp. Lit. Creat. Arts 9, 45 – 73. doi: doi:10.56279/ummaj.v9i1.3
  56. Marschall S. (2010). Articulating cultural pluralism through public art as heritage in South Africa. Vis. Anthropol. 23, 77 – 97. doi: doi:10.1080/08949460903472929
  57. McCarthy J. (2006). Regeneration of cultural quarters: public art for place image or place identity? J. Urban Des. 11, 243 – 262. doi: doi:10.1080/13574800600644118
  58. Mounajjed N. (2017). Reflections on public art in the Arabian peninsula. J. Arab. Stud. 7, 84 – 98. doi: doi:10.1080/21534764.2017.1357362
  59. Nazari N., Özbek E. I. (2023). The effects of urban design on urban identity construction: Kızılay and Kızıılırmak neighborhoods. EKSEN Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 4, 50 – 69. doi: doi:10.58317/eksen.1367205
  60. Negri M., Lelli G. (2022). “ Historical and urban identity issues in smart cities projects for small towns: the smart mobility network in Castel Bolognese, Ravenna,” in Cities’ Identity Through Architecture and Arts, 13 – 22.
  61. Nugroho A. C., Hardilla D. (2020). The importance of cultural heritage conservation in society: a review and prospect for future cities, with Bandar Lampung as a case study. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 409: 012013. doi: doi:10.1088/1755-1315/409/1/012013
  62. Nurullah A. S. (2008). Globalisation as a challenge to Islamic cultural identity. Int. J. Interdiscip. Soc. Sci. 3, 45 – 52. doi: doi:10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v03i06/52625
  63. Oktay D. (2017). Reevaluating urban identity under changing circumstances: the case of Samsun, Turkey. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 170, 189 – 204. doi: doi:10.1680/jurdp.17.00001
  64. Oktay D., Bala H. A. (2015). A holistic research approach to measuring urban identity: findings from Girne (Kyrenia) area study. Int. J. Arch. Res. 9: 201. doi: doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.687
  65. Olivier J., Thoenig M., Verdier T. (2008). Globalization and the dynamics of cultural identity. J. Int. Econ. 76, 356 – 370. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.06.009
  66. Ozoral B. (2024). “ Fostering a cultural melting pot: the UAE'S approach to multicultural integration and heritage preservation,” in Globalization and Sustainability: Ecological, Social and Cultural Perspectives, (London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen).
  67. Pallant J. F. (2000). Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived control of internal states. J. Pers. Assess. 75, 308 – 337. doi: doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_10
  68. Patel A. (2024). Role of public art in community development. Am. J. Arts Soc. Hum. Stud. 4, 47 – 57. doi: doi:10.47672/ajashs.2358
  69. Pittman J. (2017). Exploring global citizenship theories to advance educational, social, economic and environmental justice. J. Tourism Hosp. 6: 1000326. doi: doi:10.4172/2167-0269.1000326
  70. Prawata A. G. (2024). Public art as generator for creating the desirable city. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1324: 012030. doi: doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012030
  71. Roni S. M., Merga M. K., Morris J. E. (2020). Conducting Quantitative Research in Education. Singapore: Springer.
  72. Roopa S., Rani M. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 46, 273 – 277. doi: doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1104
  73. Russo A., Watkins J., Kelly L., Chan S. (2010). Participatory communication with social media. Curator Museum J. 51, 21 – 31. doi: doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00292.x
  74. Sarungu L. M. (2021). An inquiry into globalization and cultural identity: a search for a conceptual framework. Insignia J. Int. Relat. 1, 102 – 110. doi: doi:10.20884/1.ins.2021.0.0.3894
  75. Schattle H. (2017). Global Citizenship. Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations.
  76. Schumacker R. E., Lomax G. (2016). A Beginner’s guide to Structural Equation Modelling. 4th Edn. New York, NY, and Abingdon: Routledge.
  77. Sharafutdinov I. S. (2018). The role of English in the linguistic landscape of Kazan. Historical Ethnology 3, 234 – 251. doi: doi:10.22378/he.2018-3-2.234-251
  78. Suhr D. (2006). The Basics of Structural Equation Modeling Presented at: SAS User Group of the Western Region of the United States (WUSS). Irvine, CA, 1 – 19.
  79. Tan K. K. H., Choy C. W. (2020). Re-interpreting heritage: viewing the Malay peninsula’s colonial-era missionary monuments as public art. J. Herit. Tour. 15, 164 – 179. doi: doi:10.1080/1743873x.2019.1627361
  80. The HUNTR (2019). Take a Tour through the Jumeirah Art Project with The HUNTR. The HUNTR. Available online at: (Accessed May 3, 2025).
  81. tom Dieck M. C., Jung T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: a stakeholder approach. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 6, 110 – 117. doi: doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
  82. Torres C. A. (2017). Education for Global Citizenship Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
  83. Umali V. D. (2022). Public art in Mandaluyong City: implications in the community’s identity and territory. HCMCOUJS Soc. Sci. 12, 3 – 17. doi: doi:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.12.2.2154.2022
  84. UNESCO (2003). Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage. Available online at: (Accessed May 3, 2025).
  85. Vadelorge L. (2020). “ Public art in French new towns: from experiments to heritage,” in Lessons from British and French New Towns: Paradise Lost? (Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited), 173 – 182.
  86. Valibeigi M., Zivari F., Sarhangi E. (2020). Enhancing urban local community identity in Iran based on perceived residential environment quality. J. Urban Regen. Renew. 13, 435 – 452. doi: doi:10.69554/XXJN9950
  87. Wang Y. (2007). Globalization enhances cultural identity. Intercult. Commun. Stud. 16, 83–86. Available online at:
  88. Williams A. M. (2007). International labour migration and tacit knowledge transactions: a multi-level perspective. Glob. Netw. 7, 29 – 50. doi: doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00155.x
  89. Yarwood J. (2011). Urban Planning in the Middle East: Case Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  90. Zebracki M. (2013). Beyond public artopia: public art as perceived by its publics. GeoJournal 78, 303 – 317. doi: doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9440-8
  91. Zhang Y., Ikiz Kaya D., van Wesemael P., Colenbrander B. J. (2023). Youth participation in cultural heritage management: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 30, 56 – 80. doi:, doi:10.1080/13527258.2023.2275261
  92. Zitcer A., Almanzar S. M. (2019). Public art, cultural representation, and the just city. J. Urban Aff. 42, 998 – 1013. doi:, doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1601019

Citation

Alkaabi, K., et al. (2026). Cultural identity in rapidly urbanizing cities: the role of public art, urban design, and digital engagement. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Volume 8. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
8 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Alkaabi, Hussein, Senghore, Agiel and Aljaberi.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Khaula Alkaabi

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0