Skip to content

Brief Research Report

Frontiers in Tuberculosis ·

Volume 4 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ftubr.2026.1855903

Implementation of sequencing-based surveillance for drug-resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria

  • Heather P. McLaughlin1*corresponding author
  • Israel Audu2
  • Monday Tola3
  • Chika Kingsley Onwuamah4
  • Julius Ogwu3
  • Kenneth Atoe3
  • Chioma Nneka Kunle-Ope4
  • Isiyaku Ahmadu5
  • Joshua Gowon3
  • David B. Meshak3
  • Mosunmola Iwakun3
  • Chinedu Ejianya Ude3
  • Modupe Abiona3
  • Abidemi Esther Momoh4
  • Temiloluwa Ore4
  • Chinenye Angela Ogbu4
  • Temitope Abigail Abiodun4
  • Jamie Dawson1
  • Patricia Hall-Eidson1
  • Nnaemeka C. Iriemenam2
  • McPaul Okoye2
  • Clement Adesigbin6
  • Obioma Chijioke-Akaniro6
  • Elom Emeka6
  • Anyaike Chukwuma6
  1. 1Division of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
  2. 2Division of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Abuja, Nigeria
  3. 3Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
  4. 4Department of Microbiology, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. 5National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Zaria, Nigeria
  6. 6National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Sequencing for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) surveillance was established in Nigeria for the first time, demonstrating a nationally coordinated referral network for multi-disease sequencing services. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates previously identified as resistant to rifampicin and/or isoniazid by genotypic or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing were selected proportionately across all six geopolitical zones in Nigeria. Programmatic use of sequence data for DR-TB surveillance was prioritized, demonstrating additional resistance detection and enhanced monitoring as new TB treatment regimens are scaled up. Sanger sequencing identified resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid missed by drug susceptibility tests routinely used in country, for 11% (5/47) and 2% (1/47) of isolates, respectively. This pilot study demonstrates feasibility and provides an example for programmatic implementation of integrated sequencing, supporting country efforts to strengthen genomic surveillance for DR-TB and improve prevention and control globally.

Keywords

Introduction

Globally, it is estimated that 13% of deaths attributed to antimicrobial resistance are due to drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), much of which remains undetected (1). In 2024, the number of people who developed rifampicin-resistant (RIF-R) and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), defined as resistant to both rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), was estimated to be 390,000 (2). Culture-based phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) has been the gold standard for decades; however, this method is limited by inaccuracy in detecting particular cases of resistance to the critical first-line anti-TB drug RIF (1). Genotypic drug susceptibility testing (gDST) has accelerated turnaround time to bacteriological-confirmation of DR-TB but is restricted to interrogating narrow regions within a limited number of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) resistance-associated genes (3). Missed or erroneous detection of drug resistance can lead to gaps in DR-TB surveillance and mismanagement of treatment, perpetuating TB transmission and driving the epidemic. Sequencing-based detection of DR-TB can offer a more comprehensive approach to surveillance and is included in global guidance for programmatic implementation (4), however, practical barriers related to cost, laboratory infrastructure, and technical expertise may hinder introduction.

Addressing DR-TB has been prioritized globally, including in Nigeria, a high HIV/TB- and multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB burden country. As part of Nigeria's National Strategic Plan, 2021–2025 (5), the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Program (NTBLCP) aims to enhance surveillance and management of DR-TB. Successful implementation of molecular surveillance for DR-TB, including sequencing, can contribute to effective monitoring, guide country policies and treatment strategies based on drug-resistance patterns, and be used to assess the impact of disease control interventions. Sequencing can address limitations of genotypic and phenotypic DSTs and complement results by providing a more complete picture of drug resistance. Moreover, an integrated, multi-disease sequencing approach can address challenges associated with implementation such as limited resources. Herein, we describe the establishment of Nigeria's first sequencing model for DR-TB surveillance in 2022, a programmatic introduction of services into existing sequencing laboratories previously established for other diseases.

Design, findings, and discussion

Nigeria conducts TB culture and DST as part of the nation's diagnostic algorithm to detect and manage DR-TB. Clinical sputum specimens received by zonal and national TB reference laboratories (NTRLs) from health facilities across Nigeria are initially subjected to globally-recommended gDSTs. These tests include Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid), for TB diagnosis and detection of RIF resistance, followed by the first- and second-line Line Probe Assays [LPAs; GenoType MTBDRplusv2 and GenoType MTBDRslv2 (Hain Life Sciences)], for detection of resistance to RIF, INH, fluoroquinolones (FQs), and second-line injectables (SLIs). Drug-resistant isolates are referred to NTRLs for subsequent pDST to the drugs listed above and to new and repurposed drugs used to treat DR-TB, including bedaquiline (BDQ) and clofazimine (CFZ). The automated BACTEC MGIT 960 system (MGIT) (Becton, Dickinson and Company) is used to perform pDST with globally-recommended drug concentrations (6).

With support from the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), Nigeria established an HIV drug-resistance sequencing program. Through the current work, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) built on this to establish the first hub-and-spoke sequencing network for DR-TB surveillance. Under NTBLCP leadership, national programmatic priorities informed strategies for isolate selection based on resistance profiles, sample referral, and Sanger sequencing algorithm design (Figure 1). M. tuberculosis isolates (n = 49) previously identified as drug-resistant to RIF and/or INH by LPA or MGIT were selected proportionately across all six geopolitical zones of Nigeria and considered for sequencing. For efficient introduction of sequencing for DR-TB, NTRLs were linked with existing HIV-DR sequencing laboratories, integrating sequencing services for the first time for these pathogens (Figure 1A). Inactivation of Mtb cultures and gDNA extractions were performed at NTRLs using heat (95 °C, 20 min) and ultrasonication (15 min). A courier-based referral pathway was established to ship genomic DNA (gDNA) to sequencing laboratories. Samples were assessed for quality and quantity using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen). As part of a purposefully designed algorithm, sequencing of eight genomic targets associated with resistance to six anti-TB drugs was completed to maximize programmatic use of data while ensuring cost efficiency (Figure 1B). rpoB, associated with resistance to RIF, was sequenced for all Mtb isolates to confirm or identify resistance missed by other DSTs as well as help settle instances of discordance between tests. Rv0678 and atpE, associated with resistance BDQ and CFZ, were also sequenced for all isolates to introduce molecular testing for these newer drugs and to compare results with pDST. Only isolates determined to be drug susceptible to FQs, INH, and SLIs by LPA and MGIT were selected for sequencing gyrA and gyrB, katG and the inhA promoter, and rrs, respectively, to identify mutations not targeted by LPA and detect missed resistance by either test. Sanger sequencing was performed using an Applied Biosystems 3130xL or 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) with previously published primers (7, 8) and the Terminator v 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Bioinformatic analyses were performed using the software solution BacterioChek®-TB (Advanced Biological Laboratories) and Geneious Prime (v2022.2.2) whereby identified mutations were subsequently cross-referenced with the global catalogue of mutations (9) to determine resistance association. Additional details related to methodology, sampling, and validation testing may be found in Supplemental File 1.

Nigeria's first hub-and-spoke sequencing network for drug-resistant TB surveillance. A national hub-and-spoke DR-TB sequencing network and algorithm were established in Nigeria for the first time **(A)** Clinical sputa collected and confirmed positive for TB at seven zonal TB reference laboratories from all six geopolitical zones were subjected to genotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) with Xpert MTB/RIF, first-, and second-line Line Probe Assays (LPAs). Samples were cultured on Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) medium and referred to two national TB reference laboratories for MGIT-based phenotypic DST and genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction. Extracted gDNA was then sent to two Sanger sequencing laboratories previously used only for HIV. Federal Capital Territory (star). A Sanger sequencing algorithm was purposefully designed **(B)** so that all *M. tuberculosis* (Mtb) isolates were sequenced to confirm or identify missed resistance to rifampicin (RIF), bedaquiline (BDQ), and clofazimine (CFZ) (top panel). All isolates that were susceptible to isoniazid (INH, *n* = 19), fluoroquinolones (FQ, *n* = 41) or second-line injectables (SLI, *n* = 44) were sequenced to identify mutations that were either not targeted by LPA or missed (bottom panel).
Figure 1. Nigeria's first hub-and-spoke sequencing network for drug-resistant TB surveillance. A national hub-and-spoke DR-TB sequencing network and algorithm were established in Nigeria for the first time (A) Clinical sputa collected and confirmed positive for TB at seven zonal TB reference laboratories from all six geopolitical zones were subjected to genotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) with Xpert MTB/RIF, first-, and second-line Line Probe Assays (LPAs). Samples were cultured on Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) medium and referred to two national TB reference laboratories for MGIT-based phenotypic DST and genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction. Extracted gDNA was then sent to two Sanger sequencing laboratories previously used only for HIV. Federal Capital Territory (star). A Sanger sequencing algorithm was purposefully designed (B) so that all M. tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates were sequenced to confirm or identify missed resistance to rifampicin (RIF), bedaquiline (BDQ), and clofazimine (CFZ) (top panel). All isolates that were susceptible to isoniazid (INH, n = 19), fluoroquinolones (FQ, n = 41) or second-line injectables (SLI, n = 44) were sequenced to identify mutations that were either not targeted by LPA or missed (bottom panel).

The national introduction of sequencing-based DR-TB surveillance included four phases carried out over two years: (i) planning, (ii) new method validation, (iii) implementation, and (iv) data analyses for programmatic use (Figure 2). Planning for the implementation of quality sequencing services involved building technical capacity of the TB program and laboratory staff through training and developing standard operating procedures and new sequencing-specific quality control and performance indicators. New method validation of the sequencing process, from gDNA extraction, inactivation verification of extracted products, and interpretation of results, was successfully conducted at NTRLs and sequencing laboratories, with all laboratories exceeding established acceptance criteria. Of the 49 drug-resistant Mtb isolates selected for sequencing, all were tested by gDST (LPA) and pDST. Genomic DNA suitable for downstream sequencing was successfully extracted from 96% (47/49) of isolates, 100% adherence to the sequencing algorithm was achieved, and high-quality results for algorithm-determined loci were obtained for 623 (97%) of 642 sequencing reactions (Figure 2). A Microsoft Access database was created to manage data. A standardized analytics plan was developed to investigate genomic mutations against upstream DST results and maximize the programmatic use of sequencing data for DR-TB surveillance.

A phased approach for the programmatic introduction of sequencing-based drug-resistant TB surveillance in Nigeria. The introduction of sequencing-based DR-TB surveillance included four phases: (i) planning, (ii) new method validation, (iii) implementation, and (iv) data analysis for programmatic use. *M. tuberculosis* (Mtb), Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Line Probe Assays (LPA), phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST), rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FQs), and second-line injectables (SLIs), resistant (R), susceptible (S).
Figure 2. A phased approach for the programmatic introduction of sequencing-based drug-resistant TB surveillance in Nigeria. The introduction of sequencing-based DR-TB surveillance included four phases: (i) planning, (ii) new method validation, (iii) implementation, and (iv) data analysis for programmatic use. M. tuberculosis (Mtb), Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Line Probe Assays (LPA), phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST), rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FQs), and second-line injectables (SLIs), resistant (R), susceptible (S).

While sequencing analyses largely confirmed resistance reported by DSTs, it identified additional resistance to RIF for 5 (11%) and to INH for 1 (2%) of 47 isolates, initially missed by pDST and/or LPA (Table 1). Discordance was observed between LPA and pDST results for RIF for 4 (9%), INH for 7 (15%), FQs for 4 (9%), and SLIs for 3 (6%) of 47 Mtb isolates. Based on the conditional algorithm design, sequencing could be used to settle all four instances of discordance between DSTs for RIF, confirming rpoB mutations in three isolates determined to be resistance by LPA and one by pDST. Concordance between Xpert MTB/RIF and sequencing to detect resistance to RIF was observed for these four isolates as well as NIMR/E/59 in which LPA and MGIT both determined to be susceptible. One instance of discordance was recorded for isolate NIMR/A/03 in which LPA and pDST methods predicted RIF-R but no mutation was observed in rpoB by sequencing. No mutations were detected outside of the 81 bp rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR) in rpoB which has been widely associated with RIF-R and no rpoB sequences contained more than one mutation.

Table 1. Sequencing-based detection of resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid, initially missed by genotypic (line probe assay) and phenotypic (MGIT) drug susceptibility tests routinely used in Nigeria.

Mtb isolateLPA (gDST)MGIT (pDST)Sanger sequencingGene (mutation detected)Missed drug resistance
Manual analysisAutomated software
NIMR/E/46RIF-SRIF-RRIF-RrpoB, L452P(Borderline)rpoB, L452P(Borderline)INH-R ► MDR(LPA vs. Sequencing)
NTBRL/C/02RIF-RRIF-SRIF-RrpoB, L452P(Borderline)rpoB, L452 (Borderline)S ►RIF-R(MGIT vs. Sequencing)
NTBRL/A/23RIF-RRIF-SRIF-RrpoB, L430P(Borderline)rpoB, L430P(Borderline)S ►RIF-R(MGIT vs. Sequencing)
NTBRL/A/12RIF-RRIF-SRIF-RrpoB, S450LrpoB, S450LS ►RIF-R(MGIT vs. Sequencing)
NIMR/E/59RIF-SRIF-SRIF-RrpoB, H445LrpoB, H445LINH-R ► MDR(LPA & MGIT vs. Sequencing)
NTBRL/A/37RIF-RRIF-RRIF-RrpoB, ins_ttc,1,300–1,303ntNot detectedN/A
NTBRL-I-26RIF-RRIF-RRIF-RrpoB, S450L*(Heteroresistance)**Not detectedN/A
NTBRL/J/01RIF-RRIF-RRIF-RrpoB, del_aac, 1,308–1,310ntNot detectedN/A
NTBRL/A/14INH-SINH-RINH-RinhA promoter,c-15tinhA promoter c-15tRIF-R ► MDR(LPA vs. Sequencing)
Total no. missed resistance**RIF, n = 2****INH, n = 1****RIF, n = 4****INH, n = 0**––**RIF, n = 3****INH, n = 0**–

Sequencing-based prediction of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance among Mtb isolates (n = 47), missed by genotypic DST [MTBDRplus Ver 2.0, Line Probe Assay (LPA)], phenotypic DST (BACTEC MGIT 960), and/or automated bioinformatics software (Bacterio-Check). The last row indicates the total number of Mtb isolates in which RIF-R or INH-R was missed by LPA, MGIT, or automated software. (*) Potential instance of RIF heteroresistance, indicated by a double chromatogram peak. Susceptible (S), Resistant (R), Multidrug-Resistant (MDR), insertion (ins), deletion (del).

Borderline mutations in rpoB associated with low-level resistance to RIF were identified by sequencing in nine isolates originating from all geopolitical zones (Figure 2). Phenotypic DST by MGIT can fail to detect these clinically relevant variants which may fuel transmission of resistance, if undiagnosed (10). In this study, pDST missed RIF resistance in two isolates with confirmed borderline mutations, L452P and L430P (Table 1). These results are consistent with other comparative studies on DST in high-burden settings (11) and underscore the potential of sequencing to detect resistance not captured by other drug susceptibility tests routinely used in country as well as support its integration into testing algorithms for surveillance. One potential instance of RIF heteroresistance, indicated by a double chromatogram peak, and a unique insertion mutation in rpoB were missed using automated bioinformatic software, which are often restricted to a database of defined mutations for resistance prediction.

No additional resistance was detected by sequencing gyrA, gryB, or rrs in Mtb isolates determined to be susceptible to FQs (n = 41) or SLIs (n = 44) by LPA or pDST. Despite a small number of pDST-determined BDQ- (n = 6) and CFZ-resistant (n = 3) Mtb isolates, no mutations were detected in the resistance-associated genes Rv0678 or atpE, highlighting the importance of continued phenotypic testing for new drugs where molecular mechanisms and mutations associated with resistance are not yet fully understood (12).

Upon analyses completion, the NTBLCP convened a stakeholder's meeting to review strengths, challenges, lessons learned and intended programmatic uses of sequencing for DR-TB. Ensuring a strong laboratory quality management system and developing a monitoring and evaluation plan supported quality-assured testing, proactively addressed obstacles associated with new test introduction, and helped track progress of implementation and impact. Leveraging existing laboratory infrastructure and workforce expertise along with strategic design of the sequencing algorithm supported cost-effective and efficient implementation. Based on the successful phased introduction of TB services into existing sequencing investments in Nigeria and the added value of sequencing results that complemented the program's routine DST data, the NTBLCP is building on this integrated sequencing pilot project and embracing advances in technology by shifting from Sanger sequencing for DR-TB at HIV laboratories to targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for more comprehensive detection of DR-TB at the multi-disease testing laboratory, Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, to further improve surveillance and future clinical management. For strategic planning to advance DR-TB surveillance in Nigeria, strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results associated with implementation of genomic sequencing are presented in a SOAR analysis (Table 2).

Table 2. SOAR analysis for using genomic sequencing to strengthen drug-resistant TB surveillance in Nigeria.

StrengthsOpportunities
AspirationsResults

Strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results (SOAR) strategic planning framework for utilizing genomic sequencing for enhanced DR-TB surveillance in Nigeria. This forward-focused SOAR analysis concentrates on Nigeria's strengths, available opportunities, future aspirations, and desired results in-country for the implementation of sequencing-based DR-TB detection.

NGS can offer higher throughput testing and improved sensitivity to detect heteroresistance at lower frequencies compared to Sanger sequencing. Moreover, commercially-available, end-to-end tNGS solutions that include automated bioinformatic pipelines may expand test uptake and global guidance documents are available to support country adoption (13–15). This work supports integration of sequencing into surveillance frameworks, especially in high DR-TB burden settings, for enhanced detection and response. Limitations to this work include sample size and algorithm constraints that restrict generalizability and scope of sequencing results for the drug-resistant Mtb isolates tested. In addition, the lack of repeat phenotypic testing due to resource restrictions may have helped to resolve discordance observed between DST methods that known differences between molecular and culture-based testing could not explain.

Conclusions

DR-TB sequencing-based surveillance services were introduced in Nigeria for the first time using a stepwise model that successfully leveraged existing resources to provide multi-disease services. Sequencing-based DST for existing, new, and repurposed TB drugs confirmed most resistance results and identified missed drug resistance by routine testing methods, thus demonstrating utility for improved routine DR-TB surveillance. This work demonstrates feasibility and provides plans for operationalization of DR-TB sequencing in a national program setting, which may serve as an example to other countries on their journeys to strengthen genomic surveillance. The current transition to globally recommended tNGS will continue to strengthen program awareness of the national distribution of circulating DR-TB strains and TB control efforts, enhance anti-TB drug selection and treatment for TB patients, and help guide programmatic testing policies.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ftubr.2026.1855903/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary material Supplementary material at the source

Footnotes

Edited by: Didi Bang, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark

Reviewed by: Gayathri Ramasubban, EMPE Diagnostics Private Limited, India

Amresh Kumar Singh, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, India

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the U.S. CDC through Global Health Security Agenda funding (Cooperative Agreement/Grant Number NU2GGH002099).

Data availability

Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Author contributions

HM: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. IA: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. MT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CO: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JO: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. KA: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. CK-O: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. IA: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JG: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. DM: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. MI: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CU: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MA: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AM: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TO: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CO: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TA: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. PH-E: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NI: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. MO: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CA: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. OC-A: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EE: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AC: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Programme (NTBLCP) for their leadership and guidance of activities, scientists at the zonal TB reference laboratories, national TB reference laboratories (Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, NIMR, and Zaria), and sequencing laboratories (NIMR and Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, IHVN) for their contributions to laboratory testing, and CDC Nigeria colleagues for project management.

References

  1. 1. Farhat M, Cox H, Ghanem M, Denkinger CM, Rodrigues C, Abd El Aziz MS. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: a persistent global health concern. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2024) 22 (10): 617 – 35. doi:10.1038/s41579-024-01025-1
  2. 2. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2025.
  3. 3. Nandlal L, Perumal R, Naidoo K. Rapid molecular assays for the diagnosis of drug-resistant Tuberculosis. Infect Drug Resist. (2022) 15: 4971 – 84. doi:10.2147/IDR.S381643
  4. 4. World Health Organization. Guidance for the Surveillance of Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis. 6th ed. Geneva: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (2020) Available online at:
  5. 5. Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. National Strategic Plan for Tuberculosis Control, 2021–2025. (2021) Available online at:
  6. 6. World Health Organization. Technical Manual for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Medicines Used in the Treatment of Tuberculosis (2018). Geneva: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Available online at:
  7. 7. Rowneki M, Aronson N, Du P, Sachs P, Blakemore R, Chakravorty S. Detection of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by high-throughput sequencing of DNA isolated from acid fast bacilli smears. PLoS One. (2020) 15 (5): e0232343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232343
  8. 8. Yang JS, Kim KJ, Choi H, Lee SH. Delamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid Minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and resistance related gene mutations in multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Tuberculosis in Korea. Ann Lab Med. (2018) 38 (6): 563 – 8. doi:10.3343/alm.2018.38.6.563
  9. 9. World Health Organization. Catalogue of Mutations in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex and Their Association with Drug Resistance (2021). Geneva: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Available online at:
  10. 10. Rigouts L, Gumusboga M, Bram de Rijk W, Nduwamahoro E, Uwizeye C, de Jong B. Rifampin resistance missed in automated liquid culture system for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with specific rpoB mutations. J Clin Microbiol. (2013) 51 (8): 2641 – 5. doi:10.1128/JCM.02741-12
  11. 11. Tamilzhalagan S, Shanmugam S, Selvaraj A, Suba S, Suganthi C, Moonan PK. Whole-Genome sequencing to identify missed rifampicin and isoniazid resistance among Tuberculosis isolates—Chennai, India, 2013–2016. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12: 720436. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.720436
  12. 12. Naidoo K, Perumal R, Ngema S, Shunmugam L, Somboro AM. Rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant Tuberculosis-opportunities and challenges. Pathogens. (2024) 13 (1): 27. doi:10.3390/pathogens13010027
  13. 13. Schwab TC, Perrig L, Goller PC, De la Hoz FF, Lahousse AP, Minder B. Targeted next-generation sequencing to diagnose drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 24 (10): 1162 – 76. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00263-9
  14. 14. World Health Organization. Use of Next-Generation Sequencing for the Surveillance of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Implementation Manual (2023). Geneva: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Available online at:
  15. 15. World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 3: Diagnosis: Rapid Diagnostics for Tuberculosis Detection. 3rd ed. (2024). Available online at:

Citation

McLaughlin, H. P., et al. (2026). Implementation of sequencing-based surveillance for drug-resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria. Frontiers in Tuberculosis, Volume 4. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
4 - 2026

Copyright

© 2026 McLaughlin, Audu, Tola, Onwuamah, Ogwu, Atoe, Kunle-Ope, Ahmadu, Gowon, Meshak, Iwakun, Ude, Abiona, Momoh, Ore, Ogbu, Abiodun, Dawson, Hall-Eidson, Iriemenam, Okoye, Adesigbin, Chijioke-Akaniro, Emeka and Chukwuma.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Heather P. McLaughlin

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0