Skip to content

Systematic Review

Frontiers in Genetics ·

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1907333

Global trends and hotspots of genetic research on non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a bibliometric and bioinformatics analysis

  • Yuxuan Shang1,2
  • Mingjian Zhao3
  • Shuangshuang Gao2
  • Shikang Gao4*corresponding author
  • Mengru Zhu2*corresponding author
  1. 1Department of Plastic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Xiaoshan District — Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, China
  2. 2Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
  3. 3Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  4. 4Center for Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment, Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) accounts for 70% of orofacial cleft cases worldwide and causes physical dysfunction and psychological burden. Prior bibliometric studies have outlined the general NSCL/P research landscape; however, a systematic overview targeting the genetic dimension, evolutionary trends since the Human Genome Project, and dual-database cross-validation remains limited. This study mapped the global bibliometric landscape of NSCL/P genetics, identified shifting research paradigms, and functionally validated candidate genes through bioinformatic analyses of environmental risk factors. Publications from January 1990 to 31 January 2026, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using bibliometric tools, including R-Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Subsequently, Scopus publications were searched using the same search strategy for cross-validation. Finally, toxicant-induced and NSCL/P-related genes were screened from the GeneCards database to identify overlapping targets, followed by construction of a protein–protein interaction network and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis to characterize potential functional pathways. A total of 1,511 eligible publications were analyzed, covering 86 countries and regions, 1,766 institutions, 6,061 authors, and 383 journals, with rapid publication growth observed between 2018 and 2021. The United States led in output and citations alongside the University of Iowa and Murray, Jeffrey C., as key contributors. Keyword clustering categorized the current studies into four major categories: genetic analysis methodologies, developmental biology and phenotypes, epidemiology and environmental factors, and molecular regulatory mechanisms. Alcohol- and nicotine-induced overlapping pathogenic genes were identified with enriched pathways involved in the regulation of embryonic craniofacial development, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. This study clarified the publication trends, key research forces, disciplinary distributions, and hotspots in NSCL/P genetics, revealing an ongoing shift in research focus. In silico network analyses of public databases identified distinct molecular pathways mediating alcohol- and nicotine-induced developmental disorders. These findings provide reliable evidence for future mechanistic exploration of NSCL/P pathogenesis.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is a common congenital craniofacial anomaly, accounting for approximately 70% of all documented orofacial cleft cases (Zhang et al., 2018; Robinson et al., 2024; Sander et al., 2024). Three phenotypic subtypes are clinically recognized: isolated cleft lip, isolated cleft palate, and combined cleft lip and palate (Kulesa-Mrowiecka et al., 2024). Impaired craniofacial growth and compromised oral function are frequently observed in affected individuals and are accompanied by long-term psychological burdens that undermine their overall quality of life (Silva et al., 2018). Unlike syndromic forms, NSCL/P represents a complex polygenic disorder marked by substantial genetic heterogeneity, with disease susceptibility modulated by multiple variants with minor effects (Robinson et al., 2024; Scapoli et al., 2019). Genetic susceptibility, external environmental triggers, and interactive regulatory mechanisms influence its pathogenesis (Scapoli et al., 2019; Dixon et al., 2011). Systematically cataloging this evidence is essential for discerning research paradigms and molecular pathways, thereby facilitating translational practice.

Sequencing technologies have advanced rapidly since the 1990 Human Genome Project (Ruffo et al., 2025; Lindeboom et al., 2021). High-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-genome sequencing have enabled the genome-wide screening of causal genetic variants associated with congenital disorders (Qi et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2023). Concurrent advances in bioinformatics throughout the post-genomic era have facilitated the broader application of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in investigating the etiologies of complex diseases (Özkaraca et al., 2025; Rotroff, 2020). These genome-scale screening efforts have expanded the catalog of susceptible genomic regions associated with NSCL/P, with over 40 susceptible loci documented, and the number is increasing (Li et al., 2022). Cumulative genetic findings have deepened the understanding of NSCL/P genetic predisposition and have verified the core signaling pathways governing embryonic craniofacial development, including TGF-β, SHH, and Wnt signaling (Oliver et al., 2020; He et al., 2025). Despite the exponential growth in genetic discoveries, the bibliometric landscape of NSCL/P genetics, particularly its temporal evolution, geographic distribution, and thematic shifts, remains poorly characterized.

Earlier bibliometric investigations have outlined general research landscapes regarding NSCL/P, whereas recent multi-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analyses have further consolidated the catalog of susceptibility loci (Zhang et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2026; Jia et al., 2024). However, existing bibliometric studies have not focused on the genetic dimension of NSCL/P research, nor have they leveraged dual-database approaches for discovery and validation. Therefore, updated bibliometric research is required to accommodate ongoing advances in genetic research in this field. In this study, we conducted bibliometric visualization and statistical analyses of published literature over the past 3 decades to map evolutionary hotspots and research shifts within NSCL/P genetic domains. Furthermore, to functionally contextualize the bibliometrically identified candidate genes and pathways, we performed downstream bioinformatics analyses to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying environmental risk factors such as alcohol and nicotine exposure in craniofacial development. The findings of this study provide evidence-based guidance for future investigations and translational strategies for treating NSCL/P.

2. Materials and methods

Databases and search strategy

This study was designed as a bibliometric analysis combined with bioinformatics analysis of public databases, resulting in a genetic knowledge map targeting NSCL/P. Bibliometric data were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The search strategy was constructed using a combination of free-text keywords and Boolean operators in the topic field to maximize retrieval sensitivity. The complete search strings, including all synonyms, truncation symbols, and field tags, are presented in Supplementary Table S1. Temporal screening boundaries for literature retrieval were restricted to 36 years, with data collection spanning 1 January 1990, to 31 January 2026. Publications were limited to English articles and reviews; meeting abstracts, letters, proceedings papers, editorial materials, book chapters, notes, and reprints were excluded. The relevance of the retrieved publications was manually verified. Finally, 1,511 publications were identified as topic-related documents (Figure 1).

The Scopus database was searched using the same search strategy, document type, and language criteria to identify publications from 1 January 1990, to 31 January 2026. Publications were selected through manual screening to validate the research trends and hotspots observed in the WoSCC.

Data analysis and visualization

This study used Microsoft Excel 2021 to create statistical tables and trend graphs. This study employed Scimago Graphica (version 1.0.53) to analyze the countries (Hassan-Montero et al., 2022). The bibliometrix (5.0) R package in the R software (version 4.3.1) was used to conduct Lotka’s law analysis and heat mapping (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017; Kawamura et al., 1999). Furthermore, a bibliometric analysis of the countries, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, and cited references was performed using VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) and CiteSpace (version 6.4 R1) (Chen, 2004; van Eck and Waltman, 2010). Primary attention was paid to the exploration of co-authorship, co-occurrence, and co-citation patterns. Before the data were exported for follow-up analysis, overlapping entries were merged into uniform elements, misspelled terms were manually corrected, and data were rigorously cleaned.

Bioinformatic analysis

Gene data acquisition

Candidate gene sets associated with the target toxicants were retrieved from the GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org/). Genes with a relevance score >5 and classified as protein-coding genes were selected (Xing et al., 2026; Liu et al., 2026). Using the same parameters, an additional set of candidate genes related to cleft lip and palate (orofacial clefts) was obtained from GeneCards. Gene names from both sets were standardized and unified to generate an input dataset for subsequent intersection analysis.

A Venn diagram was generated using R software (version 4.3.1) and the Venn package (version 0.2.6) to visualize the overlap between the target toxicant- and orofacial cleft-related gene sets (Chen and Boutros, 2011; Team, 2023). The intersecting genes were defined as shared candidate genes associated with both the target toxicant and orofacial clefts and served as the fundamental input for subsequent protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis and enrichment analysis.

PPI network construction

The intersection gene set was submitted to the STRING database to construct a PPI network (Szklarczyk et al., 2023). The analysis was performed using the Homo sapiens species background, and the interaction pairs were filtered using the default confidence threshold. The resulting PPI network was used to identify hub genes (confidence score = 0.4) (Wu et al., 2026). The PPI network generated by STRING was imported into Cytoscape, and topological analysis was performed using the cytoHubba plugin (Shannon et al., 2003; Chin et al., 2014). The degree algorithm was applied to calculate the degree centrality of each node, and all nodes were ranked in descending order of their degree values (Shannon et al., 2003; Chin et al., 2014). The top 20 hub genes were prioritized by degree of centrality as key candidate genes for subsequent pathway enrichment analysis.

Pathway enrichment analysis

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the top 20 hub genes was conducted using the enrichKEGG function in the clusterProfiler R package (Ogata et al., 1999; Yu et al., 2012). Significant pathways were identified using multiple-testing-corrected significance thresholds (the default method implemented in ClusterProfiler), and the top 10 most relevant pathways were reported (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).

3. Results

Number of publications

Figure 2 shows the continuous increase in the annual number of publications on NSCL/P genetic research. A total of 1,511 publications related to the present study were identified between 1990 and 2026 using comprehensive database retrieval and manual screening. The period from 1990 to 2000 witnessed a gradual increase in the number of annual publications, with the cumulative number exceeding 100 for the first time in 2000. Remarkable growth in publication output was observed after 2003. Subsequently, two explosive growth phases in the average annual number of publications were recorded between 2018 and 2021. This trend suggested a steadily increasing focus on NSCL/P genetics, which has developed into an active, rapidly expanding research field.

Contribution of countries

A total of 86 countries and regions contributed to the global publication output on NSCL/P genetics (Figure 3A). The top 10 most productive countries by publication volume are summarized in Table 1. The United States ranked first with 538 publications (35.6% of the total), followed by China (N = 365, 24.2%) and Brazil (N = 141, 9.3%). Regarding citation impact, the United States also ranked highest, with 24,752 citations, followed by the United Kingdom (N = 9,577) and China (N = 6,487). Notably, despite its lower publication count compared to the United States, China, and Brazil, the United Kingdom exhibited a high average number of citations per publication (N = 72.01), which was markedly higher than those of the United States (N = 46.01), China (N = 17.77), and Brazil (N = 30.36). These observations suggested that the research output from the United Kingdom had a relatively strong academic impact and has attracted extensive attention in this field.

A minimum publication threshold of 10 publications per country was applied to construct the co-authorship network, and 53 countries were identified using VOSviewer (Figure 3B). Intensified international research collaboration among these countries occurred primarily after 2005 (Figure 3C). Among the five most productive countries, China has recently shown a marked increase in collaborative research.

Contributions by institutions

In terms of institutional distribution, the top 10 most productive institutions in NSCL/P genetics were located in the United States, China, Italy, Germany, and Brazil (Figure 4A). A minimum threshold of 10 publications was applied, and 90 institutions with collaborative authorship patterns were identified using VOSviewer to form 10 clusters (Figure 4B). In addition to the top 10 core institutions, several other institutions have gained increasing influence recently. Notable examples include the University of Puerto Rico, the University of Lagos, Emory University, University Hospital Bonn, Addis Ababa University, and Xinjiang Medical University.

Contributions of prolific authors and co-cited authors

The author records retrieved for this bibliometric assessment were compiled into a final dataset containing 6,061 contributors. The author productivity distributions were evaluated according to Lotka’s law (Figure 5A). Most contributors (70.20%) had only one published output, 13.50% had two publications, and only 5.20% had three publications. The 10 most productive authors in the field of NSCL/P genetics are listed in Table 2. Most of the top 10 co-cited authors were from the United States, with the remainder originating from China, Germany, Italy, or Denmark. Murray, Jeffrey C., from the University of Iowa, ranked first with 93 publications (6.2% of the total), followed by Marazita, Mary L., from the University of Pittsburgh (N = 89, 5.9%), and Beaty, Terri H., from Johns Hopkins University (N = 66, 4.4%). These three authors also had the highest citation counts: Murray Jeffrey C. (N = 7,723), Marazita, Mary L. (N = 5,167), and Beaty, Terri H. (N = 3,673).

Figure 5B presents the co-authorship network constructed using VOSviewer, with a minimum threshold of 10 publications per author, yielding 84 eligible authors. The resulting visualization identified 10 distinct author clusters distinguished by color, revealing close collaborative connections among the researchers. Notably, pairwise co-authorship relationships were observed among the four most productive authors. Furthermore, the three authors with the highest citation counts were included in the same cluster, which displayed a higher average citation impact than the other groups (Figure 5C). Figure 5D presents a temporal analysis of the co-authorship relationship. Scholars such as Mitchell, L.E., and Wyszynski, D.F. emerged as key contributors during the early period (1990–2000); however, their collaborative networks remained relatively independent. During the intermediate period (2001–2015), Murray, Jeffrey C., Beaty, Terri H., and Scapoli, Luca served as central figures, and collaboration networks expanded rapidly, accompanied by a substantial increase in cross-institutional and -national cooperation. In the recent stage (2016–2026), numerous new researchers have emerged, represented by Leslie, Elizabeth J., Ma, Lan, and Pan, Yongchu, with collaborative networks expanding further into East Asia.

Research disciplines

The results of the journal dual-map overlay reveal the dynamics and trends in disciplinary development. The genetic research on NSCL/P spans multiple disciplines (Figure 6). The visualization was divided into two sections: the left zone represents citing journals, indicating an evolving research frontier, and the right zone represents cited journals, forming the knowledge base. Lines of different colors were used to distinguish the various disciplines. The citing journals mostly covered disciplines #2 (Medicine, Medical, and Clinical), #4 (Molecular, Biology, and Immunology), and #9 (Dentistry, Dermatology, and Surgery). In contrast, the cited journals were primarily distributed within disciplines #2 (Environmental, Toxicology, and Nutrition), #5 (Health, Nursing, and Medicine), #8 (Molecular, Biology, and Genetics), and #14 (Dermatology, Dentistry, and Surgery).

Contribution of journals

A total of 383 journals have published articles or reviews in this field. The 10 most productive journals in this field are listed in Table 3, along with their total publication volumes and citation counts. The journal with the largest number of publications was Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal (N = 154, 10.2% of the total), followed by American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (N = 65, 4.3%) and Birth Defects Research Part A-Clinical and Molecular Teratology (N = 57, 3.8%). Simultaneously, the study period witnessed a notable surge in annual publication counts across numerous journals, particularly in 2010 (Figure 7A). Among the top 10 most productive journals, the Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal has maintained a consistently high annual publication volume. Before 2000, this journal had already become a prominent publication, together with the American Journal of Human Genetics, both of which were recognized as long-standing core journals. From 2001 to 2015, the American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A and Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology exhibited a marked increase in publication output. Since 2016, journals such as Oral Diseases and Birth Defects Research have shown increased activity in their temporal heatmap visualizations, suggesting a rising publication output in these journals.

A minimum publication threshold of five publications was set, and 71 eligible journals were included in the network construction using VOSviewer. Figures 7B,C present the resulting network, which reflects the strength of inter-journal collaborations. A temporal evolution analysis identified four major journal clusters in the field of research. Among these clusters, the blue cluster represents the earliest-formed group, comprising influential journals in craniofacial surgery, including the Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal and the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. In contrast, the green cluster represents an emerging group of journals focused on genetic research, such as Nature Communications and the European Journal of Human Genetics. The four clusters were highly interwoven, demonstrating an evolutionary trend from fundamental clinical research to the expansion of basic science, and then to interdisciplinary integration. This pattern highlighted the multidisciplinary features and knowledge translation characteristics of NSCL/P genetic research.

References co-citation, clustering, timeline, and bursts

The 10 articles with the highest citation frequencies are listed in Table 4. The most frequently cited article, titled “Cleft lip and palate: Understanding genetic and environmental influences,” was published in Nature Reviews Genetics in 2011. A co-citation analysis of the literature was performed to clarify the intellectual landscape and track the progress of genetic research in NSCL/P. Figure 8A displays 23 major nodes with the most cited references published between 2004 and 2019. Figure 8B shows distinct clusters of co-cited references that classify the literature on NSCL/P genetics into several thematic categories. A total of 20 clusters were identified in this figure, with the first labeled “0# genome-wide association study,” the second “1# case-control study,” and the third “2# maternal smoking.” The themes of these clusters correspond to research hotspots at different developmental stages in the field of NSCL/P genetics.

A timeline of the co-citation reference clusters is shown in Figure 8C. Each cluster is represented by a horizontal line of nodes, with the research theme defined by the label on the right. The node size is proportional to the citation frequency. The chronological distribution, ranging from early fundamental topics on the left to emerging research fronts on the right, reflected the intellectual evolution of the research field. Notably, several prominent recent clusters, including “0# genome-wide association study,” “#4 tp63,” “#10 meta-analysis,” and “#15 prenatal diagnosis,” are identified, which represent the core research priorities of current NSCL/P genetics investigations. The results are shown in Figure 8D. The green line denotes the overall study period spanning 1990 to 2026, whereas the red segments mark the detected burst intervals. Notably, the article “Cleft lip and palate: Understanding genetic and environmental influences” (2012–2016, intensity 65.88), authored by Dixon in 2011, exhibited the highest burst intensity.

Keywords co-occurrence, clusters, and bursts

From the 1,511 retrieved publications, 4,488 keywords were screened and extracted for subsequent analysis. Table 5 lists high-frequency genetic keywords used in this field. The most frequently detected genetic keywords included IRF6 (N = 167), MTHFR (N = 126), and TGFA (N = 115).

A keyword co-occurrence analysis was conducted to explore the thematic framework of genetic research on NSCL/P, thereby contributing to a refined division of specific research topics in this field. The keyword co-occurrence network is illustrated in Figure 9A, and four independent clusters were identified via network analysis. Cluster 1 (blue cluster): genetic analysis methodologies, including association, linkage analysis, locus, and candidate genes. Cluster 2 (green cluster): developmental biology and phenotype, including phenotype, morphology, hypodontia, congenital malformations, defects, surgery, quality of life, parents, and relatives. Cluster 3 (yellow cluster): epidemiology and environmental factors, including maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, folic acid, metabolism, birth defects, prevention, polymorphism. Cluster 4 (red cluster): molecular mechanism of NSCL/P, including mutations, variants, genome-wide, molecular genetics.

The temporal evolutionary trends of research hotspots corresponding to the four keyword clusters are shown in Figure 9B. The blue cluster presented the most active research performance in the early stage (1990–2000). During the intermediate period (2001–2015), research interests shifted to themes included in the green and yellow clusters. In contrast, the red cluster played a dominant role in research activity in the recent stage (2016–2026). Longitudinal insight into the temporal trends and peak periods of the core research keywords was provided through timeline visualization. After removing disease terms directly associated with NSCL/P, several clusters with the longest research histories were identified (Figure 9C), including #0 (mthfr), #1 (quality of life), and #3 (irf6). All these keywords were regarded as active research topics since 1990. Additionally, new research fronts have been created using several emerging keywords, including exome sequencing, maternal stress, and genome wide association. A burst detection analysis was performed to identify emerging research hotspots at specific intervals. The 30 keywords with the strongest citation bursts are shown in Figure 9D.

Cross-database validation with Scopus

We conducted cross-validation using Scopus data to assess publication trends in NSCL/P genetic research and to mitigate potential biases inherent to a single database. In total, 1,457 papers were retrieved using an identical search strategy. Figure 10A compares the annual publication outputs of WoSCC and Scopus and shows parallel growth trajectories. Figures 10B,C show keywords that appeared no fewer than 25 times. The green cluster (1990–2015) focused on genetic methodology, population studies, and developmental genetic phenotypes, including associations, genetic markers, genetic linkages, IRF6, MSX1, genetic models, and inheritance. The blue cluster (1995–2015) centered on epidemiology and environmental risk factors, such as environmental exposure, folic acid, alcohol consumption, and smoking. The red cluster (2010–2026) focused on the molecular mechanisms of NSCL/P, including gene mutations, embryonic development, animal models, gene sequencing, gene upregulation, clinical investigations, and bioinformatics. The three keyword clusters identified in Scopus confirmed the findings in WoSCC, reflecting the developmental trajectory of NSCL/P genetic research.

Alcohol- and nicotine-induced targets in NSCL/P and associated biological effects

To systematically explore the development of research on environmental toxicant-induced NSCL/P, 823 alcohol-and 252 nicotine-associated target genes were retrieved from the GeneCards database. In parallel, 2,745 NSCL/P-associated target genes were collected from the GeneCards database. Intersectional analysis of these datasets identified 331 overlapping genes potentially involved in the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced NSCL/P and 85 overlapping genes implicated in nicotine-induced NSCL/P (Figures 11A,E).

A PPI network was constructed for the two groups of NSCL/P-associated genes using the STRING database (Figures 11B,F). PPI network analysis revealed a synergistic interaction mode among overlapping target genes, with 331 alcohol-related overlapping genes forming a complex network centered on AKT1, IL6, and GAPDH. In contrast, the 85 nicotine-related overlapping genes formed a functional interaction network centered on EGFR, TNF, and HIF1A (Figures 11D,H).

Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the KEGG database on overlapping gene sets between alcohol- or nicotine-associated targets and NSCL/P-related genes. Statistical enrichment was observed for both sets in the PI3K-Akt, MAPK, AGE-RAGE, FoxO, JAK-STAT, TNF, and HIF-1α signaling pathways (Figures 11C,G). Distinctly, alcohol-specific targets were enriched in the TGFβ signaling pathway and apoptosis, whereas nicotine-specific targets were enriched in the VEGF, AMPK, and growth hormone synthesis pathways (Figures 11C,G).

4. Discussion

The publication output of NSCL/P genetic research has maintained an increasing trend over the years, with a notable increase observed after 2003. Recently, while the annual output has remained high, the growth rate has stabilized after 2022. Taken together, these three observations—the acceleration after 2003, the explosive growth phase between 2018 and 2021, and the stabilized growth rate after 2022—suggest that the development of NSCL/P genetic research has proceeded through three successive methodological paradigms rather than a simple growth curve. The first acceleration coincided with the landmark identification of IRF6 as a landmark early major susceptibility gene through linkage and association strategies (Zucchero et al., 2004). This discovery transformed NSCL/P genetics from a field constrained by scarce a priori hypotheses into a gene-mapping discipline. The steepest growth between 2018 and 2021 followed the maturation of multi-ancestry GWAS meta-analyses and the widespread application of next-generation sequencing (Yu et al., 2017; Leslie et al., 2017). These advances expanded the documented catalog of susceptibility loci to over 40 and substantially broadened the accessibility of genomic screening. Notably, the reference with the strongest citation burst in the field—Dixon et al., 's 2011 synthesis—was a review rather than a discovery paper (Dixon et al., 2011). This pattern is characteristic of maturing research fields. In such fields, synthetic reviews become focal points of citation because empirical findings accumulate faster than they can be integrated. This shift marks the transition from discovery-driven to framework-driven research. Accordingly, the stabilized growth rate after 2022 should not be interpreted as waning interest. It indicates that common-variant discovery is approaching saturation and that the field is entering a consolidation phase. This interpretation is consistent with the progressive shift of citing journals toward clinical application and molecular-mechanism outlets.

In terms of the research discipline, a significant discrepancy between citing and cited journals was revealed. Citing journals are concentrated on clinical applications and molecular mechanism research, whereas cited journals cover basic disciplines, including genetics and environmental science. This pattern indicates that solid foundations in basic disciplines have been laid for NSCL/P genetic research, and a trend has emerged that has shifted from theoretical exploration to clinical translational practice. The co-citation analysis further supports this disciplinary distribution and illustrates the developmental trajectory of this field. In the early stages, studies focused on classical genetic epidemiological approaches, including twin studies and linkage analyses. In the middle period, priorities shifted toward case-control designs and gene–environment interaction analyses. Recently, GWAS has emerged as a mainstream approach, advancing candidate gene identification and the exploration of molecular mechanisms (Robinson et al., 2023). This evolving progress has enriched the theoretical framework underlying the genetic mechanisms of NSCL/P and laid the foundation for the establishment of preventive and therapeutic protocols.

Among countries and institutions, the United States ranked first in both publications and total citations. However, despite the larger publication volumes in these nations, lower average citations per publication were observed in the United States, China, and Brazil than in the United Kingdom. This discrepancy between productivity and impact has also been reported in previous bibliometric assessments of oral cleft research, suggesting that strengthened cooperation with leading international teams and improved research quality should be prioritized to advance the field (Xu et al., 2026). Scholars have established their research status as academic contributors, including Murray, Jeffrey C., Marazita, Mary L., and Beaty, Terri H., whose research priorities have centered on susceptibility gene mapping, gene–environment interaction studies, and clinical translation. Overlapping publication outputs across careers can be attributed to long-term collaborative partnerships. Co-authorship network visualization reveals that most collaborative activities remain confined to domestic teams. However, several institutions, including the University of Iowa, the University of Pittsburgh, and Sichuan University, have achieved high publication productivity and serve as key network nodes. This distribution pattern can be explained by the concentration of senior researchers at these institutions; further cross-regional cooperation is required to strengthen global academic communication.

Research keyword analysis

Cluster analysis of 178 keywords yielded four distinct clusters, which were mapped onto four interrelated thematic domains: genetic analytical approaches; developmental biology and phenotypic characteristics; epidemiology and environmental risk factors; and molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. Combined with the timeline graph of keywords and the top 30 burst terms, mthfr, and quality of life maintained a sustained high frequency from 1990 to 2026, thereby serving as persistent research hotspots across the field. Recently, the importance of keywords such as genome-wide association studies and exome sequencing have been increasingly prominent. The emergence of clusters related to comorbid conditions, such as epilepsy, and breast cancer, further indicates that NSCL/P genetics has recently expanded toward pleiotropic and mechanistic questions, which is consistent with the comorbidity analyses discussed below. These studies are closely linked to the exploration of molecular mechanisms in NSCL/P and are highly consistent with the clustering results derived in the current study. Through a systematic analysis of the four core clusters using a timeline visualization, this study identified hotspots and research trends in the genetics of NSCL/P.

Furthermore, the burst-detection analysis offers a fine-grained record of these paradigm shifts. Each burst term can be regarded as the signature of a methodological generation. The earliest bursts—segregation analysis, linkage, and complex segregation analysis—all began in 1992. They correspond to the era in which family-based studies formally established the complex polygenic architecture of NSCL/P. The second wave, represented by growth factor alpha (1992–2005), MSX1 (2001–2007), and candidate genes (2001–2008), marks the candidate-gene era. Notably, growth factor alpha exhibited the strongest burst strength (31.67). During this period, prior knowledge of craniofacial morphogens guided association testing. The third wave is clearly technology-driven. It comprises genome scan (2003–2011), 8q24 (2013–2018), and genome-wide association studies (2016–2022). Of note, the most recent bursts that remain active through 2026 are rare variants, identify, and identification. This pattern indicates that the research focus of the field has shifted from common-variant association toward the discovery and characterization of rare, potentially high-penetrance variants through exome and genome sequencing. This trajectory, extending from linkage analysis through candidate-gene studies and common-variant GWAS to rare-variant discovery, closely mirrors the methodological evolution of complex-disease genetics as a whole. NSCL/P genetics may therefore be regarded as a microcosm of the post-genomic era. In addition, the dominance of IRF6, MTHFR, and TGFA in keyword frequency is itself informative. IRF6 has remained at the forefront. It represents the largest-effect locus identified to date and a hub of subsequent functional studies. TGFA and MTHFR, by contrast, are legacy candidate genes whose early associations were only partially replicated in GWAS. Their sustained high frequency may therefore reflect citation inertia as much as current etiological importance. Keyword counts measure scholarly attention; they do not necessarily indicate biological centrality.

Early stage (1990–2000): blue cluster (genetic analysis methodologies)

The blue cluster represents the most active research front during the early period, which focused on genetic analysis methodologies. Family-based segregation analysis has revealed that NSCL/P follows a complex polygenic inheritance pattern, with environmental factors modifying its effects (Farrall and Holder, 1992; Mitchell and Risch, 1992; Hecht et al., 1991). The single-gene inheritance hypothesis was excluded from this finding, and a solid theoretical foundation was provided for subsequent research. Linkage analysis has served as the primary tool for localizing susceptibility loci prior to the widespread application of GWAS (Cichon et al., 2009). Using this method, several chromosomal regions, including 19q13 and 2p13, were preliminarily identified as associated with NSCL/P across multiple populations (Wong et al., 2000; Field et al., 1994). Guided by the craniofacial developmental hypothesis, candidate genes, including TGFA, MSX1, and BMP4, have been preferentially screened (Ardinger et al., 1989; Satokata and Maas, 1994; Bennett et al., 1995). Association analysis revealed that polymorphic loci in TGFA and MSX1 co-segregated with NSCL/P phenotypes in the familial pedigree (Feng et al., 1994). Although population-level heterogeneity was detected in some studies, the research paradigm of candidate gene screening followed by population validation was firmly established during this period (Schutte and Murray, 1999). This framework advances the characterization of known genes, facilitates the discovery of additional pathogenic genes, such as IRF6, and supports mechanistic investigations into the associated signaling pathways (Zucchero et al., 2004). Taken together, the lasting contribution of this early era was not any single susceptibility locus, but the establishment of NSCL/P as a tractable, genetically heterogeneous complex trait, without which the subsequent GWAS era could not have emerged.

Middle stage (2001–2015): green cluster (developmental biology and phenotypes) and yellow cluster (epidemiology and environmental factors)

At mid-term, the research hotspots shifted to the green cluster, themed on developmental biology and phenotype, and the yellow cluster focused on epidemiology and environmental factors. Notably, the limitation of focusing solely on morphological descriptions of craniofacial development was overcome at this stage. Candidate gene screening and GWAS have been used to conduct large-scale explorations of phenotype–genotype correlations and to dissect the genetic heterogeneity of distinct phenotypic subtypes. This shift has driven a pivotal paradigm change in NSCL/P from a morphological description to the dissection of etiological mechanisms. Additionally, population-based association analysis, animal models, and cellular functional experiments were used to explore susceptible variants and the molecular regulatory mechanisms of classic candidate genes, including IRF6, TGFB3, and MSX1 (Zhang et al., 2002; Park et al., 2007; Suazo et al., 2010; Rahimov et al., 2008). These genes do not act independently; they regulate craniofacial development through cross-pathway crosstalk and gene–gene synergistic interactions. This period was regarded as a pivotal stage in the development of NSCL/P genetics (Beaty et al., 2010). Research on the susceptibility landscape and pathogenic mechanisms of NSCL/P has significantly expanded through investigations of gene–environment interactions, phenotype–genotype associations, and GWAS. Genetic research on NSCL/P has shifted from single-dimensional genetic mapping to multidimensional integrated analysis, laying a solid foundation for subsequent molecular mechanistic studies and clinical translation.

Recent stage (2016–2026): red cluster (molecular regulatory mechanism of NSCL/P)

Since 2015, the red cluster has remained at the forefront of NSCL/P genetic research. This phase is characterized by GWAS, mutations, and variants as core keywords. The functional and molecular mechanisms of key pathogenic genes, including TP63 and CDH1, have been intensively investigated, and research outcomes have increasingly been translated into clinical applications, such as prenatal diagnosis and precision prevention. These findings demonstrate that research priorities in NSCL/P genetics have shifted toward the exploration of molecular mechanisms and clinical translational research. Candidate gene identification continues to expand the spectrum of susceptible loci beyond 40, with attention shifting toward regulatory mechanisms in non-coding regions (Jia et al., 2024; Ludwig et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2015; Avasthi et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2020). Single-cell and transcriptomic sequencing have been used to explore craniofacial development and the underlying molecular regulatory networks. A two-locus inheritance model based on epistatic antagonism was proposed, which differs from the conventional digenic inheritance model and further optimizes the polygenic synergistic pathogenic architecture of NSCL/P (He et al., 2025). Research has also been extended to comorbidity analyses, with associations investigated between NSCL/P and disorders, including hypothyroidism and cancer, providing a novel perspective for elucidating pathogenic mechanisms (Lidral et al., 2015; Raterman et al., 2025). Although clinical translation pathways and intervention strategies remain unclear, advances in transcriptomics are accelerating progress toward precision prevention (Yang et al., 2026). Noninvasive prenatal testing has been widely used for prenatal diagnosis of multiple congenital malformations (Dupras et al., 2022; Löwy, 2022). After further verification and optimization, this technology, combined with high-throughput next-generation sequencing, is expected to detect and analyze circulating cell-free DNA in maternal peripheral blood and noninvasively identify fetal NSCL/P-related genetic variants (Stanley et al., 2025; Schwammenthal et al., 2024). Precision prevention strategies that integrate genetic susceptibility and environmental risk factors are gradually improving. The persistence of identification-related keyword bursts into 2026 suggests that this mechanism-oriented phase remains in its discovery stage rather than having entered a mature synthesis stage, implying that the next inflection point of the field will depend on which of these molecular findings can be functionally validated and effectively translated into clinical practice.

Cross-database validation

Cross-validation with Scopus significantly strengthened the reliability of the results obtained from the WoSCC. Although the two databases differ in their publication counts, their annual publication trends show largely parallel curves and nearly identical growth patterns. Keyword comparisons further validated the reliability of the thematic patterns identified via the WoSCC and provided complementary insights. Based on the keyword co-occurrence analysis, we confirmed the evolutionary trajectory of NSCL/P genetic research since the launch of the Human Genome Project. The early stages primarily focused on genetic analysis methodologies and susceptibility locus mapping. Middle-stage research has shifted to environmental risk factors and craniofacial development. Recent studies have employed bioinformatics, gene sequencing, and other techniques to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms (Fang et al., 2025; Xiong et al., 2026). We further clarified the potential mechanisms of environmental risk factors and the progression of craniofacial development. The parallel evolution of keyword clusters in the WoSCC and Scopus not only confirms the robustness of our findings but also carries a substantive implication. The paradigm shifts identified in this study reflect the behavior of the scientific community rather than artifacts of any single indexing database. The three Scopus clusters—genetic methodology (1990–2015), epidemiology and environmental risk (1995–2015), and molecular mechanism (2010–2026)—recapitulate the same left-to-right transition observed in the WoSCC. Notably, the molecular-mechanism cluster overlaps both earlier clusters in time. This temporal overlap suggests that mechanism-oriented research is currently assimilating the earlier methodological traditions rather than replacing them. This cross-database concordance demonstrates that our bibliometric mapping reflects the authentic scholarly evolution in this field, rather than biases specific to individual databases.

Environmental risk factors were identified by combining bibliometrics and bioinformatics

The bibliometric findings delineate an evolutionary trajectory in NSCL/P genetic research from linkage analysis to multi-omics integration. Research on environmental risk factors has followed a course comparable to that of molecular network interrogation. However, the molecular bridge connecting exposure to malformations remains poorly characterized (Garland et al., 2020). GeneCards and STRING resources were integrated for the network toxicology analysis of alcohol- and nicotine-induced targets. Alcohol and nicotine were selected as exemplar exposures for three reasons supported by our bibliometric data. First, both exposures have consistently ranked among the most frequent environmental keywords across all 3 decades. Second, cigarette-smoking-related keywords produced the strongest environmental bursts in the dataset, signaling sustained etiological attention. Third, although alcohol and nicotine are the most extensively documented modifiable environmental risk factors for NSCL/P, the molecular mechanisms through which they perturb craniofacial development remain incompletely characterized. Closing this gap between epidemiological association and mechanistic understanding is precisely the objective of the present network analysis.

Enrichment analysis revealed seven shared cascades: PI3K-Akt, MAPK, AGE-RAGE, FoxO, JAK-STAT, TNF, and HIF-1α. While the PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways direct craniofacial development, the remaining pathways have been implicated in convergent processes, including inflammation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and apoptosis (Dinsmore and Soriano, 2018; Cai et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2011). STRING analysis identified INS, TNF, TGFB1, STAT3, and EGFR as shared hub nodes. Functionally, both teratogens may compromise epithelial proliferation and differentiation within the palatal shelves, preventing adequate outgrowth and medial edge epithelial adhesion during the critical developmental window. This convergence explains how distinct environmental conditions induce the funnel to form a unified NSCL/P phenotype.

Despite their shared pathogenic foundations, alcohol and nicotine exhibit markedly divergent signatures in specific regulatory contexts. Alcohol-related intersection targets showed selective enrichment in TGF-β signaling and apoptosis. TGF-β governs medial edge epithelial differentiation and basement membrane dissolution, whereas apoptosis provides programmed cell death required for palate fusion; both are indispensable for closure. This selective pattern suggests that alcohol preferentially disrupts the fusion program. Additionally, IL6 and TNF are central regulatory molecules within the alcohol-specific network, supporting the inference that alcohol compromises embryonic microenvironmental stability by activating endogenous oxidative stress and persistent inflammatory stimulation (Dobrucki et al., 2024; Zou et al., 2026; Lussier et al., 2021).

In contrast, the nicotine-related intersection targets were selectively enriched for VEGF, AMPK, and growth hormone synthesis. Although HIF-1α and FoxO represent shared pathways between the two exposures, HIF1A is a critical functional gene in the nicotine-specific PPI network, and VEGF, an established downstream effector of HIF-1 signaling, was selectively enriched, implicating aberrant hypoxia-induced angiogenesis as a prominent pathogenic modality (Zhang et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2012; Küchler et al., 2018). These findings corroborate the view that maternal smoking contributes to localized hypoxic damage in the fetal craniofacial tissues (Juliá-Burchés et al., 2024; Lacerda et al., 2021). Nicotine-driven HIF-1α activation and FoxO perturbation may interfere with the spatiotemporal progression of facial process fusion. Therefore, the dual commonality and specificity highlight the need to advance from environmental association to the precise mechanistic elucidation of the gene–environment interplay in NSCL/P.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, the bibliometric data were primarily drawn from the WoSCC, with Scopus used only for cross-validation. Publications indexed exclusively in PubMed or EMBASE may have been overlooked. Restrictions on English-language articles may also have introduced language bias by excluding relevant studies published in other languages. Second, citation-based metrics naturally suffer from temporal lags, and ongoing indexing delays, particularly for 2026 publications, may have led to an underestimation of their current citation impact. Third, all bioinformatic findings were generated from publicly available databases. Therefore, the identified candidate genes and enriched pathways should be treated as computationally prioritized hypotheses that require experimental validation rather than as confirmed biological mechanisms.

In conclusion, this study summarizes the current progress in NSCL/P genetics research through a bibliometric analysis and comprehensively depicts the overall research landscape from multiple dimensions, including publication output, country, institution, author, discipline, journal, literature, and keywords. Research hotspots were categorized into four main research directions, revealing a clear research transition from genetic locus screening and candidate gene validation to mechanistic exploration of molecular pathways and integrated multi-omics analysis. The chronicle of keyword bursts further indicates that this transition is still ongoing, as the most recent bursts that remain active through 2026—rare variants, identify, and identification—signal that the discovery of rare, high-penetrance variants and their mechanistic characterization will remain the dominant direction of the field in the coming years. Further bioinformatic analysis identified the core signaling pathways and hub genes underlying NSCL/P pathogenesis induced by two typical environmental risk factors, alcohol and nicotine. Notably, TGF-β signaling and apoptosis were selectively enriched among alcohol-induced targets, whereas the HIF-1α/VEGF axis was preferentially implicated in nicotine-induced targets, highlighting both convergent and exposure-specific molecular foundations of gene–environment interplay. Investigations into gene–environment interactions and molecular mechanisms remain central research priorities. With the continuous advancement of sequencing technologies, single-cell sequencing and multi-omics integration have been increasingly applied to explore craniofacial development and its underlying molecular regulatory networks, and these approaches are expected to further dissect the molecular mechanisms of NSCL/P. The hub genes and enriched pathways identified in this study should be regarded as computationally prioritized hypotheses that warrant experimental validation in cellular and animal models. After further verification, these candidate targets may first inform practical preventive measures, such as genotype-guided management of periconceptional exposures, whereas pathway-based molecular interventions, although currently supported only by proof-of-concept evidence from animal models, may serve as a longer-term research direction. Relevant findings will further facilitate clinical translation and accelerate the prevention, diagnosis, and intervention of NSCL/P.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

YS: Validation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Software, Visualization. MZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. SuG: Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Software, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Formal Analysis. SiG: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization, Project administration, Validation. MZ: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Project administration, Validation.

References

  1. Ardinger H. H., Buetow K. H., Bell G. I., Bardach J., VanDemark D. R., Murray J. C. (1989). Association of genetic variation of the transforming growth factor-alpha gene with cleft lip and palate. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 45, 348 – 353.
  2. Aria M., Cuccurullo C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Inf. 11, 959 – 975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  3. Avasthi K. K., Muthuswamy S., Asim A., Agarwal A., Agarwal S. (2021). Identification of novel genomic variations in susceptibility to nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate patients. Pediatr. Rep. 13, 650 – 657. doi:10.3390/pediatric13040077
  4. Beaty T. H., Murray J. C., Marazita M. L., Munger R. G., Ruczinski I., Hetmanski J. B. (2010). A genome-wide association study of cleft lip with and without cleft palate identifies risk variants near MAFB and ABCA4. Nat. Genet. 42, 525 – 529. doi:10.1038/ng.580
  5. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 57, 289 – 300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
  6. Bennett J. H., Hunt P., Thorogood P. (1995). Bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -4 expression during murine orofacial development. Arch. Oral Biol. 40, 847 – 854. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(95)00047-s
  7. Cai S., Si N., Wang Y., Yin N. (2022). Transcriptomic analysis of the upper lip and primary palate development in mice. Front. Genet. 13, 1039850. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1039850
  8. Chen C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (Suppl. 1), 5303 – 5310. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100
  9. Chen H., Boutros P. C. (2011). VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinforma. 12, 35. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-35
  10. Chin C. H., Chen S. H., Wu H. H., Ho C. W., Ko M. T., Lin C. Y. (2014). cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst. Biol. 8 (Suppl. 4), S11. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11
  11. Cichon S., Craddock N., Daly M., Faraone S. V., Gejman P. V., Kelsoe J. (2009). Genomewide association studies: history, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 540 – 556. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08091354
  12. Dinsmore C. J., Soriano P. (2018). MAPK and PI3K signaling: at the crossroads of neural crest development. Dev. Biol. 444 (Suppl. 1), S79 – s97. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.02.003
  13. Dixon M. J., Marazita M. L., Beaty T. H., Murray J. C. (2011). Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 167 – 178. doi:10.1038/nrg2933
  14. Dobrucki I. T., Miskalis A., Nelappana M., Applegate C., Wozniak M., Czerwinski A. (2024). Receptor for advanced glycation end-products: biological significance and imaging applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 16, e1935. doi:10.1002/wnan.1935
  15. Dupras C., Birko S., Affdal A. O., Haidar H., Lemoine M. E., Ravitsky V. (2022). Governing the futures of non-invasive prenatal testing: an exploration of social acceptability using the Delphi method. Soc. Sci. Med. 304, 112930. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112930
  16. Fang C., Huang X., Wang Q., Fei Y., Wang X., Zheng Y. (2025). Single-cell transcriptomics reveal oxidative phosphorylation and oxidative stress in the superior temporal plane of non-syndromic cleft lip and palate fetuses. Life Sci. 381, 123922. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123922
  17. Farrall M., Holder S. (1992). Familial recurrence-pattern analysis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50, 270 – 277.
  18. Feng H., Sassani R., Bartlett S. P., Lee A., Hecht J. T., Malcolm S. (1994). Evidence, from family studies, for linkage disequilibrium between TGFA and a gene for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55, 932 – 936.
  19. Field L. L., Ray A. K., Marazita M. L. (1994). Transforming growth factor alpha: a modifying locus for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2, 159 – 165. doi:10.1159/000472359
  20. Garland M. A., Reynolds K., Zhou C. J. (2020). Environmental mechanisms of orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Res. 112, 1660 – 1698. doi:10.1002/bdr2.1830
  21. Hassan-Montero Y., De-Moya-Anegón F., Guerrero-Bote V. P. (2022). SCImago Graphica: a new tool for exploring and visually communicating data. Prof. De. LA Inf. 31, e310502. doi:10.3145/epi.2022.sep.02
  22. He Q., Yu M., Jiao Y., Xu Y., Liang X., Huang W. (2025). Exome sequencing reveals the genetic Architecture of non-syndromic orofacial clefts and identifies BOC as a novel causal gene. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 12, e12073. doi:10.1002/advs.202412073
  23. Hecht J. T., Yang P., Michels V. V., Buetow K. H. (1991). Complex segregation analysis of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49, 674 – 681.
  24. Hu P., Zhang Q., Cheng Q., Luo C., Zhang C., Zhou R. (2023). Whole genome sequencing vs chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 229, 302.e1 – 302.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.005
  25. Huang X., Yokota T., Iwata J., Chai Y. (2011). Tgf-beta-mediated fasl-fas-caspase pathway is crucial during palatogenesis. J. Dent. Res. 90, 981 – 987. doi:10.1177/0022034511408613
  26. Jia Z., Mukhopadhyay N., Yang Z., Butali A., Sun J., You Y. (2024). Multi-ancestry genome wide Association Study meta-analysis of non-syndromic orofacial clefts.
  27. Juliá-Burchés C., Martínez-Varea A., Morales-Roselló J., Diago-Almela V. (2024). Impact of maternal smoking on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies: a narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 13, 7329. doi:10.3390/jcm13237329
  28. Kawamura M., Thomas C. D., Kawaguchi Y., Sasahara H. (1999). Lotka's law and the pattern of scientific productivity in the dental science literature. Med. Inf. Internet Med. 24, 309 – 315. doi:10.1080/146392399298320
  29. Küchler E. C., Silva L. A. D., Nelson-Filho P., Sabóia T. M., Rentschler A. M., Granjeiro J. M. (2018). Assessing the association between hypoxia during craniofacial development and oral clefts. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 26, e20170234. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0234
  30. Kulesa-Mrowiecka M., Lipowicz A., Marszałek-Kruk B. A., Kania D., Wolański W., Myśliwiec A. (2024). Characteristics of factors influencing the occurrence of cleft lip and/or palate: a case analysis and literature review. Child. (Basel) 11, 399. doi:10.3390/children11040399
  31. Lacerda R. H. W., Furtado P. G. C., Vieira A. R. (2021). Maternal smoking leads to larger cleft palate defects. Front. Dent. Med. 1, 632037. doi:10.3389/fdmed.2020.632037
  32. Leslie E. J., Carlson J. C., Shaffer J. R., Butali A., Buxó C. J., Castilla E. E. (2017). Genome-wide meta-analyses of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts identify novel associations between FOXE1 and all orofacial clefts, and TP63 and cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Hum. Genet. 136, 275 – 286. doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1754-7
  33. Li X., Tian Y., Qiu L., Lou S., Zhu G., Gao Y. (2022). Expression quantitative trait locus Study of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate GWAS variants in lip tissues. Cells 11, 3281. doi:10.3390/cells11203281
  34. Lidral A. C., Liu H., Bullard S. A., Bonde G., Machida J., Visel A. (2015). A single nucleotide polymorphism associated with isolated cleft lip and palate, thyroid cancer and hypothyroidism alters the activity of an oral epithelium and thyroid enhancer near FOXE1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 3895 – 3907. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv047
  35. Lindeboom R. G. H., Regev A., Teichmann S. A. (2021). Towards a human cell Atlas: taking notes from the past. Trends Genet. 37, 625 – 630. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.03.007
  36. Liu C., Li L., Sun Q., Zhang Y., Li S., Guan J. L. (2026). The “two flowers therapy”: clinical efficacy and mechanisms of a total glucosides of paeony -colchicine dual-drugs for Behçet's disease derived from Chinese physicians' medication experience. Front. Immunol. 17, 1813907. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1813907
  37. Löwy I. (2022). Non-invasive prenatal testing: a diagnostic innovation shaped by commercial interests and the regulation conundrum. Soc. Sci. Med. 304, 113064. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113064
  38. Ludwig K. U., Böhmer A. C., Bowes J., Nikolic M., Ishorst N., Wyatt N. (2017). Imputation of orofacial clefting data identifies novel risk loci and sheds light on the genetic background of cleft lip ± cleft palate and cleft palate only. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 829 – 842. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddx012
  39. Lussier A. A., Bodnar T. S., Weinberg J. (2021). Intersection of epigenetic and immune alterations: implications for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and mental health. Front. Neurosci. 15, 788630. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.788630
  40. Ma L., Lou S., Miao Z., Yao S., Yu X., Kan S. (2020). Identification of novel susceptibility loci for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24, 13669 – 13678. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15878
  41. Mitchell L. E., Risch N. (1992). Mode of inheritance of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a reanalysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51, 323 – 332.
  42. Ogata H., Goto S., Sato K., Fujibuchi W., Bono H., Kanehisa M. (1999). KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of Genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 29 – 34. doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29
  43. Oliver J. D., Turner E. C., Halpern L. R., Jia S., Schneider P., D'Souza R. N. (2020). Molecular diagnostics and in utero therapeutics for orofacial clefts. J. Dent. Res. 99, 1221 – 1227. doi:10.1177/0022034520936245
  44. Özkaraca M., Agung M., Navarro P., Tenesa A. (2025). Divide and conquer approach for genome-wide association studies. Genetics 229, iyaf019. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyaf019
  45. Park J. W., McIntosh I., Hetmanski J. B., Jabs E. W., Vander Kolk C. A., Wu-Chou Y. H. (2007). Association between IRF6 and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in four populations. Genet. Med. 9, 219 – 227. doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e3180423cca
  46. Qi Q., Jiang Y., Zhou X., Lü Y., Xiao R., Bai J. (2024). Whole-genome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies: novel phenotype-genotype discoveries. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 664 – 671. doi:10.1002/uog.27517
  47. Rahimov F., Marazita M. L., Visel A., Cooper M. E., Hitchler M. J., Rubini M. (2008). Disruption of an AP-2alpha binding site in an IRF6 enhancer is associated with cleft lip. Nat. Genet. 40, 1341 – 1347. doi:10.1038/ng.242
  48. Raterman S. T., Wagener F., Zethof J., Cuijpers V., Klaren P. H. M., Metz J. R. (2025). foxe1 mutant zebrafish show indications of a hypothyroid phenotype and increased sensitivity to ethanol for craniofacial malformations. Dev. Dyn. 254, 240 – 256. doi:10.1002/dvdy.745
  49. Robinson K., Mosley T. J., Rivera-González K. S., Jabbarpour C. R., Curtis S. W., Adeyemo W. L. (2023). Trio-based GWAS identifies novel associations and subtype-specific risk factors for cleft palate. HGG Adv. 4, 100234. doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100234
  50. Robinson K., Curtis S. W., Leslie E. J. (2024). The heterogeneous genetic architectures of orofacial clefts. Trends Genet. 40, 410 – 421. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2024.02.004
  51. Rotroff D. M. (2020). A bioinformatics crash course for interpreting genomics data. Chest 158, S113 – s123. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.004
  52. Ruffo P., Traynor B. J., Conforti F. L. (2025). Unveiling the regulatory potential of the non-coding genome: insights from the human genome project to precision medicine. Genes Dis. 12, 101652. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101652
  53. Sander F. H., Jørgensen D. S., Jakobsen L. P., Jensen A. N., Lousen T., Sandager P. (2024). Prenatal detection of orofacial clefts in Denmark from 2009 to 2018. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 507 – 513. doi:10.1002/uog.27488
  54. Satokata I., Maas R. (1994). Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat. Genet. 6, 348 – 356. doi:10.1038/ng0494-348
  55. Scapoli L., Carinci F., Palmieri A., Cura F., Baj A., Beltramini G. (2019). Copy number variation analysis of twin pairs discordant for cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 33, 2058738419855873. doi:10.1177/2058738419855873
  56. Schutte B. C., Murray J. C. (1999). The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1853 – 1859. doi:10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853
  57. Schwammenthal Y., Rabinowitz T., Basel-Salmon L., Tomashov-Matar R., Shomron N. (2024). Noninvasive fetal genotyping using deep neural networks. Brief. Bioinform 26, bbaf067. doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf067
  58. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N. S., Wang J. T., Ramage D. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498 – 2504. doi:10.1101/gr.1239303
  59. Shi D., Guo W., Chen W., Fu L., Wang J., Tian Y. (2012). Nicotine promotes proliferation of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by regulating α7AChR, ERK, HIF-1α and VEGF/PEDF signaling. PLoS One 7, e43898. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043898
  60. Silva M., Balderrama I. F., Wobeto A. P., Werneck R. I., Azevedo-Alanis L. R. (2018). The impact of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on oral health-related quality of life. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 26, e20170145. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0145
  61. Stanley K. E., Thienpont B., Vermeesch J. R. (2025). Expanding the scope of non-invasive prenatal screening. Nat. Genet. 57, 2644 – 2654. doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02377-x
  62. Suazo J., Santos J. L., Scapoli L., Jara L., Blanco R. (2010). Association between TGFB3 and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a Chilean population. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 47, 513 – 517. doi:10.1597/09-015
  63. Sun Y., Huang Y., Yin A., Pan Y., Wang Y., Wang C. (2015). Genome-wide association study identifies a new susceptibility locus for cleft lip with or without a cleft palate. Nat. Commun. 6, 6414. doi:10.1038/ncomms7414
  64. Szklarczyk D., Kirsch R., Koutrouli M., Nastou K., Mehryary F., Hachilif R. (2023). The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638 – d646. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000
  65. Team R. C. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  66. van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. SCIENTOMETRICS 84, 523 – 538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  67. Wong F. K., Hagberg C., Karsten A., Larson O., Gustavsson M., Huggare J. (2000). Linkage analysis of candidate regions in Swedish nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate families. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 37, 357 – 362. doi:10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0357_laocri_2.3.co_2
  68. Wu S., Dai W., Lin J., Hong X. (2026). Systems toxicology integration uncovers trophoblast apoptosis as a pivotal mechanism underlying PFAS-related recurrent miscarriage. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 1889539. doi:10.3389/fcell.2026.1889539
  69. Xing F., Wang Q., Xv Z., Li D., Shi R., Li L. (2026). Identification and validation of a natural killer cell-associated immunomodulatory gene signature for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Exp. Gerontol. 223, 113267. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2026.113267
  70. Xiong L. L., Huang X. W., Xiao Q. X., Zheng Y. G., Qin H. Y., Fang C. L. (2026). Single-Nucleus RNA sequencing reveals mid-gestational neurodevelopment features in the superior temporal plane from fetuses with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 13, e04191. doi:10.1002/advs.202504191
  71. Xu Z., Wang Y., Li D. (2026). Trends in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 127, 102749. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2026.102749
  72. Yang C., Ding L., Dong Y., Wang Y., Cao S., Yuan Z. (2026). Advancements in pathogenic genes and biomarkers for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate via multiomics. Int. Dent. J. 76, 109282. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2025.109282
  73. Yu G., Wang L. G., Han Y., He Q. Y. (2012). clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics 16, 284 – 287. doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118
  74. Yu Y., Zuo X., He M., Gao J., Fu Y., Qin C. (2017). Genome-wide analyses of non-syndromic cleft lip with palate identify 14 novel loci and genetic heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 8, 14364. doi:10.1038/ncomms14364
  75. Zhang Z., Song Y., Zhao X., Zhang X., Fermin C., Chen Y. (2002). Rescue of cleft palate in Msx1-deficient mice by transgenic Bmp4 reveals a network of BMP and Shh signaling in the regulation of mammalian palatogenesis. Development 129, 4135 – 4146. doi:10.1242/dev.129.17.4135
  76. Zhang Q., Tang X., Zhang Z. F., Velikina R., Shi S., Le A. D. (2007). Nicotine induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in human lung cancer cells via nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated signaling pathways. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 4686 – 4694. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2898
  77. Zhang S. J., Meng P., Zhang J., Jia P., Lin J., Wang X. (2018). Machine learning models for genetic risk assessment of infants with non-syndromic orofacial cleft. Genomics Proteomics Bioinforma. 16, 354 – 364. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2018.07.005
  78. Zhang Q., Yue Y., Shi B., Yuan Z. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of cleft lip and palate-related publication trends from 2000 to 2017. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 56, 658 – 669. doi:10.1177/1055665618807822
  79. Zou H., Wang S., Huang C., Dooley S., Meindl-Beinker N. M. (2026). Transforming growth Factor-β signaling in alcohol-associated liver disease: a multicellular perspective. Am. J. Pathol. 196, 50 – 67. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2025.09.017
  80. Zucchero T. M., Cooper M. E., Maher B. S., Daack-Hirsch S., Nepomuceno B., Ribeiro L. (2004). Interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene variants and the risk of isolated cleft lip or palate. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 769 – 780. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032909

Citation

Shang, Y., et al. (2026). Global trends and hotspots of genetic research on non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a bibliometric and bioinformatics analysis. Frontiers in Genetics, Volume 17. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
17 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Shang, Zhao, Gao, Gao and Zhu.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Shikang Gao; Mengru Zhu

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0