Skip to content

Editorial

Frontiers in Arachnid Science ·

Volume 5 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frchs.2026.1890569

Editorial: Horizons in arachnid science

  • Volker Herzig1,2,3
  • Peter Schausberger4
  • Jason E. Bond5
  • Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz6
  • Matjaž Kuntner7,8,9,10*corresponding author
  1. 1Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
  2. 2School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
  3. 3Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  4. 4Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  5. 5Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
  6. 6Anses, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Maisons-Alfort, France
  7. 7Department of Organisms and Ecosystems Research, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  8. 8Jovan Hadži Institute of Biology, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  9. 9Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, United States
  10. 10Centre for Behavioural Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, China
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Keywords

Frontiers in Arachnid Science, a community-rooted journal, aims to engage researchers across a full spectrum of disciplines, including early-career scientists and established researchers. We are pleased to introduce the inaugural “Horizons in Arachnid Science” collection, featuring invited, high-impact, and accessible reviews synthesizing transformational arachnology research. Contributors were selected by the Chief Editors in recognition of their scientific contributions and impact.

Among arachnids, spiders (order Araneae) represent the second most diverse order, with 53,967 currently described species (World Spider Catalog, 2026). Despite this remarkable diversity, the natural history, ecology, and evolutionary relationships of many spider lineages remain poorly understood. Two reviews in this Research Topic address these gaps from complementary perspectives by focusing on both a widespread ecological strategy and a charismatic focal lineage.

Agnarsson provides a comprehensive synthesis of kleptoparasitism in spiders, highlighting the strong taxonomic concentration of both hosts and kleptoparasites and identifying recurring ecological and evolutionary patterns underlying these associations. The review demonstrates how web architecture, host body size, and sociality shaped opportunities for resource exploitation, while also emphasizing the remarkable diversity of kleptoparasitic strategies ranging from prey theft to web invasion and araneophagy. The review additionally highlights the critical role of spiders as “superhosts” for diverse kleptoparasitic and commensal organisms, emphasizing how web architecture and host ecology shape interactions. By integrating scattered observations into a comparative evolutionary framework, this review establishes the foundations for future studies on the evolution of interspecific interactions, behavioral specialization, and social evolution.

In a second review, Yu et al. synthesize current knowledge on fishing spiders (genus Dolomedes; family Dolomedidae), a charismatic group of semi-aquatic predators distributed across most continents. Although Dolomedes species have become important model systems in behavioral ecology, physiology, and evolutionary biology, major geographic and taxonomic gaps persist, particularly outside Europe and North America. By integrating research on morphology, ecology, behavior, conservation, and evolution, the authors provide both a comprehensive overview of current knowledge and a roadmap for future comparative and interdisciplinary research on this remarkable lineage.

Systematics and taxonomy continue to provide the essential framework upon which all biological disciplines depend. Yet despite rapid advances in phylogenomics, many arachnid groups remain taxonomically challenging due to morphological convergence, cryptic diversity, and incomplete sampling. Briggs and Hamilton address these issues through a critical examination of theraphosid systematics and taxonomy. Their review highlights how morphology-based classifications have sometimes confounded evolutionary relationships thereby emphasizing the growing need for integrative taxonomic approaches incorporating genomic data. Beyond tarantulas, this review illustrates broader challenges currently facing arachnid systematics/taxonomy and emphasizes the need for integrative, data-rich approaches to biodiversity research.

The Acari (mites and ticks) comprise the most diverse arachnid order, with approximately 60,000 described species (Zhang et al., 2021). Among them, plant-inhabiting spider mites (Tetranychidae) have emerged as formidable model animals for ecology, behavior and evolution research. An intriguing question is the link between group-living and silk production. Silk has been observed in several terrestrial and aquatic mite families (Shatrov and Soldatenko, 2024), yet group-living spider mites stand out as the most advanced silk-producers. In their review, Saito and Sato introduce the fascinating diversity of web-producing spider mites and characterize basic webbing types. These webs have multi-functional relevance in joint host plant colonization and exploitation, brood care, hygienic behavior and predator defense, and abiotic hazards. Strikingly, the complexity of webbing and nest construction reflects the various degrees of sociality among and within spider mite genera and species. By integrating current knowledge, this review serves as important reference and stimulus for future comparative studies on group-living and cooperation in silk-producing arachnids (Lubin and Bilde, 2007; Schausberger et al., 2021).

Silk production is one of the most remarkable evolutionary innovations among arachnids attracting increasing interest owing to its extraordinary material properties. In their review, Maraldo et al. examine recent advances in the recombinant production and characterization of spider silks, with emphasis on spidroin synthesis, protein assembly, and biomimetic fiber production. The review highlights the considerable technical challenges and major opportunities associated with translating spider silk biology into high-performance biomaterials. By integrating developments in biochemistry, structural biology, materials science, and computational modeling, this contribution demonstrates how advances in arachnid biochemistry and biomaterials research are increasingly informing developments in biotechnology and bioengineering.

Besides silk, venom is another key innovation underlying the ecological diversification of arachnids. The fact that arachnid venoms evolved primarily for injection into prey or predator poses challenges for translating venom compounds as therapeutics, diagnostics, biopesticides, and tools for targeting disease vectors and parasites (Herzig, 2023; Saez and Herzig, 2019). Addressing this issue, Wang et al. review arachnid peptide toxins capable of crossing biological membranes, including vertebrate and insect blood-brain barriers and insect midgut epithelium. The authors discuss biochemical properties underlying membrane permeability and examine strategies for enhancing membrane penetration of toxins to expand their translational potential.

Recent work has increasingly highlighted ecological and translational relevance of arachnid venom enzymes, including phospholipases, hyaluronidases, proteases, and other enzymatic components involved in prey immobilization, tissue degradation, venom spreading, and bioactivity (Delgado-Prudencio et al., 2022; Dresler et al., 2026, 2024, 2025; Krayem and Gargouri, 2020; Kuhn-Nentwig et al., 2019). Complementing this work, Dresler et al. provide the first systematic overview of known spider venom enzymes, synthesizing current knowledge on diversity, ecological functions, and potential industrial applications. Their review demonstrates that venom enzymes are involved in a broad range of biological processes including prey digestion, toxin spreading, precursor activation, venom preservation, and multifunctional physiological roles, highlighting the largely unexplored translational potential of enzymes for applications in biotechnology, waste management, agriculture and pharmaceuticals.

Collectively, the contributions to this inaugural Horizons in Arachnid Science collection reveal a field undergoing rapid confluence with recent advances in theory, experimentation, methodology, and cutting-edge applications to important scientific challenges. The contributions on arachnid silk and venom position arachnid science at the intersection of organismal biology and translational and bioeconomic research. Such interdisciplinary perspectives increasingly connect arachnid biology with broader global challenges in environmental change, biotechnology, and health research (Kuntner, 2022), with arachnid science being poised for substantial contributions well beyond its traditional boundaries.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited and reviewed by: Gustavo Silva De Miranda, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, United States

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors VH, PS, JB, AC-C, and MK declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Author contributions

VH: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. PS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. JB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AC-C: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

References

  1. Delgado-Prudencio G., Cid-Uribe J. I., Morales J. A., Possani L. D., Ortiz E., Romero-Gutierrez T. (2022). The enzymatic core of scorpionvenoms. Toxins 14, 1–25. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins14040248
  2. Dresler J., Herzig V., Schulte L., Lüddecke T. (2026). Bioactivity profiling of spider venoms reveals predominant hyaluronidase activities. Toxicon 269, 108667. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108667
  3. Dresler J., Herzig V., Vilcinskas A., Lüddecke T. (2024). Enlightening the toxinological dark matter of spider venom enzymes. NPJ Biodivers. 3, 25. doi: doi:10.1038/s44185-024-00058-2
  4. Dresler J., Rodriguez I., Paas A., Cabrera-Orefice A., Vilcinskas A., Lüddecke T. (2025). Prospects and challenges of recombinant spider venom enzymes: insights from Loxosceles and Phoneutria venom protease expressions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13, 1668774. doi: doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1668774
  5. Herzig V. (2023). Grand challenges in arachnid toxinology and biochemistry. Front. Arachn Sci. 2. doi: doi:10.3389/frchs.2023.1302040
  6. Krayem N., Gargouri Y. (2020). Scorpion venom phospholipases A(2): A minireview. Toxicon 184, 48 – 54. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.05.020
  7. Kuhn-Nentwig L., Langenegger N., Heller M., Koua D., Nentwig W. (2019). The dual prey-inactivation strategy of spiders – in-depth venomic analysis of Cupiennius salei. Toxins 11, 1–37. doi: doi:10.3390/toxins11030167
  8. Kuntner M. (2022). The seven grand challenges in arachnid science. Front. Arachn. Sci. 1, 1082700. doi: doi:10.3389/frchs.2022.1082700
  9. Lubin Y., Bilde T. (2007). The evolution of sociality in spiders. Adv. Stud. Behav., 37, 83 – 145. doi: doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37003-4
  10. Saez N. J., Herzig V. (2019). Versatile spider venom peptides and their medical and agricultural applications. Toxicon 158, 109 – 126. doi: doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.11.298
  11. Schausberger P., Yano S., Sato Y. (2021). Cooperative behaviors in group-living spider mites. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 745036. doi: doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.745036
  12. Shatrov A., Soldatenko E. V. (2024). Ultrastructure of silk threads of the water spider Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck 1757) (Araneae, Cybeidae) in comparison with that of some mites. Front. Arachn Sci. 3, 1384553. doi: doi:10.3389/frchs.2024.1384553
  13. World Spider Catalog (2026). Natural History Museum Bern. Available online at: http://wsc.nmbe.ch (Accessed June 19, 2026).
  14. Zhang Z. Q., Schatz H., Pfingstl T., Goldschmidt T., Martin P., Pesic V.. (2021). Discovering and documenting Acari: the first twenty years in Zootaxa. Zootaxa 4979, 115 – 130. doi: doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.13

Citation

Herzig, V., et al. (2026). Editorial: Horizons in arachnid science. Frontiers in Arachnid Science, Volume 5. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
5 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Herzig, Schausberger, Bond, Cabezas-Cruz and Kuntner.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Matjaž Kuntner

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0