Skip to content

Original Research

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems ·

Volume 10 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1960698

Integrated assessment of agricultural and processing-related chemical hazards across the food chain: glyphosate occurrence and lipid changes in ready-to-eat corn-based foods

  • Wendy Jannette Ascencio-López1
  • María Teresa Zayas-Pérez2
  • T. Alexandra Ferreira3
  • Ricardo Munguía-Pérez2
  • Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón4
  • Teresa Soledad Cid-Pérez5
  • Raúl Avila-Sosa5*corresponding author
  1. 1Posgrado en Ciencias Ambientales, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Ciudad Universitaria, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
  2. 2Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Ciudad Universitaria, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
  3. 3Universidad del Valle de México, San Andrés Cholula, Mexico
  4. 4Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
  5. 5Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Ciudad Universitaria, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
Article metrics0 viewsView details

Abstract

Ready-to-eat foods may accumulate chemical hazards from both agricultural production and food processing. These hazards converge in the same food but are usually evaluated separately. This study assessed both types of hazard together in corn-based foods consumed on a Mexican university campus, as an integrated food-chain approach. Ten tortilla and ten tortilla chip samples were collected from campus cafeterias and food stalls. They were screened for glyphosate by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD), as an indicator of agricultural chemical hazards. Dietary exposure was estimated with a conservative upper-bound scenario and expressed as a hazard quotient (HQ) relative to the acceptable daily intake (ADI). Six paired frying-oil samples, collected before and after frying, were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to estimate iodine value (IV) as an indicator of lipid unsaturation. Glyphosate signals were detected in 8/10 tortilla and 10/10 tortilla chip samples (90% overall). Screening-level concentrations ranged from 0.107 to 1.994 mg kg −1. Detected concentrations were above the Mexican maximum residue limit (MRL) for corn grain (0.1 mg kg −1) and below the Codex Alimentarius MRL for maize (5 mg kg −1); both limits were used only as regulatory reference points. HQ values were 0.0573 for women and 0.0511 for men, so estimated exposure was below the ADI under the assumed scenario. IV decreased significantly after frying (mean decrease 5.00 units; 95% CI 1.30–8.71; p = 0.0178). Ready-to-eat corn-based foods may carry both agricultural residues and processing-related lipid changes. HQ < 1 does not imply absence of risk. The frequent detection of glyphosate supports continued monitoring and confirmatory analysis by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). This integrated approach can support food safety surveillance in institutional food environments.

Keywords

1 Introduction

Chemical and microbiological contamination of foods represents a major concern for food safety, particularly in collective consumption environments where food is prepared repeatedly and under variable sanitary control. Chronic dietary exposure to chemical residues, even at low concentrations, may pose cumulative health risks, especially when contaminants are present in staple foods consumed daily (Suvorov and Stancu, 2021). Prepared foods are particularly relevant for food safety surveillance as a component of food security because they may contain chemical hazards originating at different stages of the food chain, including agricultural residues and compounds generated during thermal processing (Bejarano Roncancio and Suárez Latorre, 2015; Zhang et al., 2020). Although these hazards arise through independent processes, they ultimately coexist within the same food matrix and contribute to overall dietary chemical exposure.

Food security depends not only on food availability and access but also on the safety and quality of foods reaching consumers. Within the conceptual framework proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), food utilization encompasses the safe consumption of food as a prerequisite for achieving food security (FAO, 2006). Consequently, this dimension may be compromised by chemical contaminants originating at different stages of the food chain, particularly in institutional food environments where ready-to-eat foods constitute a substantial part of the diet.

In Mexico, corn-based foods such as tortillas and tortilla chips constitute a fundamental component of the daily diet and are widely consumed in institutional settings, including university cafeterias and food stalls. Given the high per capita consumption of corn-based food products in Mexico (González-Ortega et al., 2017; Solís-Martínez et al., 2025), even low levels of contaminants may result in continuous exposure. Within the university environment, specific dietary patterns reinforce this risk; for instance, “chilaquiles” (fried tortilla chips simmered in sauce) are among the most frequently consumed dishes in campus cafeterias, representing a staple of the institutional diet (Ascencio-López et al., 2025). Furthermore, tortillas play a significant role in daily university nutrition as the primary vehicle for traditional products like “tacos.” Due to their low cost and high availability, these products represent a primary food source for college students, a population characterized by frequent consumption of ready-to-eat foods and limited nutritional oversight (Chandrika et al., 2021).

Glyphosate (N-(Phosphonomethyl) glycine; molecular formula C3H8NO5P; CAS No. 1071-83-6), with a molar mass of 169.07 g/mol, is the most widely used herbicide worldwide and has raised increasing concern due to its persistence in food products and potential long-term health effects (Martins-Gomes et al., 2022; Klátyik et al., 2023; González-Cruz et al., 2025). Although its mechanism of action targets shikimic acid pathway in plants (Louie et al., 2021; Vicini et al., 2021), glyphosate residues have been frequently detected in corn and processed foods, raising concerns about chronic dietary exposure (González-Cruz et al., 2025). This exposure has been associated with systemic toxicity, including neurodegenerative, endocrine, and multi-organ effects (Peillex and Pelletier, 2020; Ignácio et al., 2024; Nunes et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2025; Stone et al., 2025). In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” (IARC and WHO, 2015).

Although regulatory agencies have established acceptable exposure limits for glyphosate, concerns regarding chronic dietary intake persist. In Mexico, the acceptable daily intake (ADI) is 0.3 mg kg−1 day−1 and the maximum residue limit (MRL) for corn is 0.1 mg kg−1 (COFEPRIS, 2009), which is more stringent than the Codex Alimentarius MRL of 5 mg kg-1 (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2006). This regulatory framework reflects the national policy aimed at gradually replacing glyphosate in staple crops. However, herbicide continues to be widely used because economically and agronomically viable alternatives remain limited. Since no specific MRL has been established for processed corn products, the MRL for corn grain was considered only as a regulatory reference point for contextual comparison with the concentrations measured in tortillas and tortilla chips, rather than as a product-specific compliance limit.

Additionally, frying is one of the most common cooking practices in institutional food services. Repeated thermal exposure of vegetable oils promotes oxidative degradation, reducing lipid unsaturation and generating oxidation products than may compromise both nutritional quality and food safety (FAO, 2006; Montenegro-Bonilla et al., 2023). Consequently, ready-to-eat foods may contain chemical hazards originating from different stages of the food chain, including agricultural residues remaining from crop production and chemical changes generated during food preparation. Although these processes arise independently, they converge within the same food matrix consumed by the population, supporting an integrated food safety perspective.

Despite the public health relevance of this integrated perspective, the analysis of pesticide exposure in institutional food services has also highlighted data gaps concerning processed and ultra-processed foods, as well as limitations in the availability of maximum residue limits and food-specific residue data (da Silva et al., 2024). This underscores the necessity for further research to assess agricultural chemical residues in conjunction with processing-related changes in ready-to-eat foods consumed under real food-service conditions.

Furthermore, although Mexico is implementing policies aimed at the gradual substitution of glyphosate, the herbicide continues to be widely used because effective alternatives capable of maintaining agricultural productivity remain limited. Consequently, residues may still reach processed foods that are subsequently subjected to thermal preparation.

Therefore, this study aimed to provide an integrated assessment of chemical hazards across the food chain by screening glyphosate occurrence as an agricultural contaminant together with evaluating processing-related changes in lipid saturation in tortillas and tortilla chips consumed within a Mexican university campus. Rather than investigating mechanistic interactions between glyphosate and processing-derived compounds, the study evaluates complementary sources of chemical risk that coexist within the same ready-to-eat food matrix, providing a more realistic representation of dietary exposure in institutional food environments.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and samples

All chemical reagents and solvents used in this study were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (Toluca, Mexico), and J.T. Baker (Mexico City, Mexico). Acetonitrile and water used for sample extraction and mobile phase preparation were of High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) grade, while all other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Glyphosate standard (purity ≥98%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (Toluca, Mexico). Quantification was performed using an external calibration curve prepared from a commercial glyphosate standard with known concentration. No internal standard was used in the analytical procedure.

A total of 32 samples were collected for this study, comprising 20 corn-based foods (10 tortillas and 10 tortilla chips) and 12 vegetable oil samples (6 paired samples collected before and after frying). Samples were randomly collected from cafeterias and food stalls that represent the main food sources for students at Ciudad Universitaria of the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico, between June 10 and 12, 2024. The samples were intended for preliminary screening of glyphosate occurrence and processing-related lipid changes in this specific university food environment.

For each tortilla sample, two standard units (approximately 55 g) were collected. Tortilla chip samples consisted of 20 units per sample, (35–40 g). Food samples were placed clean, labeled polyethylene bags and transported under refrigeration to the laboratory for analysis. Vegetable oil samples were collected directly from frying equipment before and after use. Each oil sample was transferred to amber glass bottles, protected from light with aluminum foil, sealed, labeled, and transported to the laboratory for analysis.

2.2 Analytical strategy and experimental design

The analytical strategy was designed considering the characteristics of processed corn-based foods, which typically contain lipid fractions derived from frying processes that may interfere with chromatographic detection. High-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) was employed as a screening approach to evaluate glyphosate occurrence in processed corn-based foods. No derivatization step was applied prior to chromatographic analysis. Glyphosate occurrence was evaluated by direct HPLC-DAD analysis under the chromatographic conditions described below. Oil degradation was evaluated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) through estimation of iodine value (IV). Each analytical method was independently validated according to its respective performance parameters.

2.3 Screening of glyphosate occurrence using HPLC-DAD

2.3.1 Sample preparation

Sample treatment followed the methodology described by Cano García et al. (2023), with specific adaptations for processed corn-based matrices. Initially, 15 g of each homogenized sample was weighed and transferred into cellulose extraction cartridges. The procedure included a pre-treatment step to address the high fat content in tortilla chips. Samples underwent Soxhlet extraction using 180 mL of hexane for five reflux cycles under controlled conditions. Hexane removed lipophilic components and frying oils from the matrix. This lipid removal reduces matrix interference and potential interference (Cherta et al., 2013; Łozowicka et al., 2014). Following extraction, the solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator (Sev, model A402-2). Samples were reconstituted in 15 mL of distilled water. This aqueous recovery is highly effective for glyphosate due to its high polarity and water solubility, an approach previously validated in cereal matrices (Cano García et al., 2023). Despite glyphosate’s polar nature, this protocol ensures adequate recovery and reproducibility. Finally, the solution was filtered through a 0.20 μm nylon syringe filter (Agilent Technologies, Captiva, Santa Clara, CA, USA) prior to chromatographic analysis.

2.3.2 Method validation

Glyphosate analysis was performed using an Agilent 1260 HPLC system equipped with a diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Separation was achieved with a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and water (60:40 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. The injection volume was 20 μL, and detection was carried out at 234 nm. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using OpenLab CDS software (version 2.8, Agilent Technologies). Glyphosate stock solutions were prepared from the analytical standard (purity ≥98%) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. These solutions were used to fortify a blank tortilla matrix with no detectable glyphosate signal under the analytical conditions. A matrix-matched external calibration curve was prepared at nine concentration levels ranging from 0 to 2.00 mg L−1. The analytical performance parameters obtained from the calibration and fortification experiments are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Analytical performance of the HPLC-DAD screening procedure for glyphosate.

ParameterResult
CalibrationMatrix-matched external; 0–2.00 mg L−1 (9 points)
Regression equationy = 16.8945x + 0.3192
R20.9994
Fortification levels0.20, 0.40, 0.60 mg L−1
Recovery98.71–101.27%
Replicatesn = 3 per level per day; 3 days
Matrix effectNot independently quantified
ParameterResult
LOD0.06 mg L−1
LOQ0.19 mg L−1
Intra-day precision3.14%, 1.06%, 1.06% RSD*
Inter-day precision3.89%, 1.15%, 1.27% RSD*
Internal standardNot used

*RSD, Relative standard deviation. Intra-day RSD. Values correspond to 0.20, 0.40, and 0.60 mg L−1, respectively.

Precision was evaluated using matrix fortified at three concentration levels (0.20, 0.40, and 0.60 mg L−1), with three replicates per concentration level over three consecutive days. Recovery was also evaluated using the fortified matrix. No internal standard was used, and matrix effects were not independently quantified by comparison of solvent- and matrix-based calibration slopes.

For screening purposes, peak assignment was based primarily on the retention time established with the glyphosate calibration standard (RT = 1.658 min). DAD spectral information was not used as an independent confirmation criterion. Because glyphosate exhibited early elution under the selected reversed-phase conditions, retention-time matching alone was not considered sufficient for definitive identification. Accordingly, the procedure was applied as a screening approach, and confirmation by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) or another suitably selective analytical method would be required for definitive identification and quantitative confirmation. The results were compared with the maximum residue limit (MRL) established for corn in Mexico (0.1 mg kg−1) (COFEPRIS, 2009), and the Codex Alimentarius MRL (5 mg kg−1) (FAO/WHO, 2024).

2.3.3 Risk assessment

Dietary exposure to glyphosate was calculated using the Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) and Hazard Quotient (HQ) models.

The EDI of glyphosate was calculated in Equation 1:

EDI = C × IR BW (1)

where C is the highest screening-level glyphosate concentration detected in the analyzed food samples (mg kg−1), IR is the daily intake rate of corn-based food (kg day−1), and BW is the average body weight (kg). A daily intake rate of 0.5 kg of corn-based foods was used, based on the average per capita consumption reported for Mexico by González-Ortega et al. (2017), and the BW was 58 kg for women and 65 kg for men (Forbe et al., 2008). For the conservative exposure scenario, the highest screening-level glyphosate concentration detected across the analyzed food samples (1.994 mg kg−1 bw day−1) was used. Thus, the assessment represents an upper-bound screening scenario in which the maximum observed concentration is applied to the assumed daily intake of corn-based foods.

The HQ values were calculated using Equation 2:

HQ = EDI ADI (2)

where ADI is the acceptable daily intake for glyphosate (0.3 mg kg−1 bw day−1), according to (COFEPRIS, 2009). An HQ value below 1 indicates estimated exposure below this reference value under the assumptions used but does not imply absolute safety. As EDI was expressed on a daily basis, exposure frequency (EF) and averaging time (AT) were not included separately because EDI was expressed on a daily basis. The conservative scenario used the highest screening-level concentration and the assumed daily intake of corn-based foods.

For example, for women (58 kg body weight), using C = 1.994 mg kg−1 and IR = 0.5 kg day−1:

EDI = 1.994 mg kg − 1 × 0.5 kg day − 1 58 bw kg = 0.01719 mg kg − 1 bw day − 1

The corresponding HQ was calculated as:

HQ = 0.01719 mg kg − 1 bw day − 1 0.3 mg kg − 1 bw day − 1 = 0.0573

The exposure assessment was not performed as separate consumption scenarios for tortillas and tortilla chips, nor as a combined consumption model based on the actual consumption proportions of both products. Instead, a conservative upper-bound screening scenario was constructed using the highest screening-level concentration detected across the analyzed food samples (1.994 mg kg−1) and the reported average daily intake of 0.5 kg of corn-based foods.

2.4 FT-IR spectroscopy analysis of oils

FT-IR spectra of vegetable oil samples were recorded using a Bruker ALPHA II Platinum spectrophotometer. Spectra were acquired over the interval of 4,000–400 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1, averaging 32 scans per measurement.

The iodine value (IV), as an indicator of unsaturation degree, was estimated according to Guillén and Cabo (1998) using the absorbance ratio between the olefinic bonds band at 3,007 cm−1 and the aliphatic groups at 2,824 cm−1, (x = A3007/A2824). The IV was calculated in Equation 3:

IV = 4.5 × 751.4 x (3)

where IV represents the iodine value, and x is the absorbance ratio. The coefficients a = 4.5 and b = 751.4 were determined via simple linear regression, with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.99. Differences between paired oil samples collected before and after frying were evaluated using a paired t-test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The normality of the paired differences was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Because the analysis involved paired observations, homogeneity of variance between groups was not assumed. Effect size and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to complement the p-value. FT-IR analysis was applied as a rapid, non-destructive screening approach to evaluate the degree of lipid unsaturation associated with rancidity and oxidation through the estimation of IV (Castorena-García et al., 2011). This analytical approach was not intended for the identification of specific oxidation or degradation products, but rather to function for assessing structural changes in fatty acids associated with thermal processing.

3 Results and discussion

The analytical procedure used for screening glyphosate occurrence in processed corn-based foods demonstrated adequate analytical performance under the conditions of this study. The matrix-matched calibration curve was linear over the concentration range of 0–2.00 mg L−1 (R2 = 0.9994), as presented in Figure 1, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.06 mg L−1 and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.19 mg L−1. The concentrations reported below should therefore be interpreted as screening-level estimates obtained under the analytical conditions described above (Figure 2). Repeatability and reproducibility, expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), were evaluated at three matrix-fortification levels (0.20, 0.40, and 0.60 mg L−1) in triplicate over three consecutive days. Intra-day precision values were 3.14%, 1.06%, and 1.06% RSD, respectively, whereas inter-day precision values were 3.89%, 1.15%, and 1.27% RSD, respectively. Recovery ranged from 98.71 to 101.27% (Table 2). These results indicate consistent analytical performance under the experimental conditions used.

**(A)** Matrix-matched external calibration curve for glyphosate obtained using HPLC-DAD over the range of 0–2.00 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (*R*<sup>2</sup> = 0.9994). **(B)** Chromatogram of glyphosate standard, where the retention time was used as the primary criterion for screening-level peak assignment (RT = 1.658 min).
Figure 1. (A) Matrix-matched external calibration curve for glyphosate obtained using HPLC-DAD over the range of 0–2.00 mg L−1 (R2 = 0.9994). (B) Chromatogram of glyphosate standard, where the retention time was used as the primary criterion for screening-level peak assignment (RT = 1.658 min).
Overlaid chromatograms of the matrix-matched glyphosate calibration series (0–2.00 mg L<sup>−1</sup>). The 0.00 mg L<sup>−1</sup> trace corresponds to the blank tortilla matrix. The retention time established using the glyphosate standard was used as the primary criterion for screening-level peak assignment.
Figure 2. Overlaid chromatograms of the matrix-matched glyphosate calibration series (0–2.00 mg L−1). The 0.00 mg L−1 trace corresponds to the blank tortilla matrix. The retention time established using the glyphosate standard was used as the primary criterion for screening-level peak assignment.

Table 2. Performance characteristics of the HPLC-DAD screening method.

Fortification level (mg L−1)DayReplicate 1 (mAU)Replicate 2 (mAU)Replicate 3 (mAU)Intra-day RSD (%)Inter-day RSD (%)
0.2013.4973.7623.7043.81—
0.2023.5543.4593.6753.563.89
0.2033.8213.8723.7182.06—
0.4017.0757.1367.3011.04—
0.4027.1217.2187.0581.071.15
0.4036.9717.2167.1871.08—
0.60110.61310.49610.5271.11—
0.60210.27410.51210.4571.201.27
0.60310.36910.60210.4830.88—

RSD, relative standard deviation.

Screening-level glyphosate signals were detected in 8/10 tortilla samples (80%) and 10/10 tortilla chip samples (100%), corresponding to 18 of the 20 samples analyzed (90% overall). Screening-level concentrations in tortillas ranged from 0.107 to 1.994 mg kg−1, while tortilla chips showed concentrations between 0.170 and 1.373 mg kg−1 (Table 3). Because the study design did not include controlled frying experiments using the same starting material, the comparison between tortillas and tortilla chips was observational and does not allow the effect of frying on glyphosate concentrations to be isolated. All detected concentrations remained below the Codex Alimentarius MRL for corn grain (5 mg kg−1). However, most analyzed samples (90%) showed screening-level concentrations above 0.1 mg kg−1, the Mexican MRL established for corn (COFEPRIS, 2009), which was used here as a regulatory reference point. Therefore, in the absence of a specific MRL for tortillas and tortilla chips, these comparisons should be considered within a broader regulatory context rather than as a direct determination of compliance for the processed products analyzed. Among all analyzed samples, the highest screening-level concentration was observed in tortillas (1.994 mg kg−1), whereas the highest concentration in tortilla chips was 1.373 mg kg−1 (Figure 3). This discrepancy underscores differences between national and international regulatory criteria and highlights the need for clearer residue standards in processed corn-based foods.

Representative HPLC-DAD chromatograms of glyphosate screening signals in corn-based foods: **(A)** tortillas and **(B)** tortilla chips. Colors indicate relative signal intensity: pink (highest), green (lowest), and purple (intermediate). The dashed line marks the glyphosate retention time used for screening-level peak assignment (RT = 1.658 min).
Figure 3. Representative HPLC-DAD chromatograms of glyphosate screening signals in corn-based foods: (A) tortillas and (B) tortilla chips. Colors indicate relative signal intensity: pink (highest), green (lowest), and purple (intermediate). The dashed line marks the glyphosate retention time used for screening-level peak assignment (RT = 1.658 min).

Table 3. Glyphosate concentration (mg kg−1) from tortillas and tortilla chips samples collected in cafeterias located within Ciudad Universitaria of Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.

SampleConcentration (mg kg−1)
TortillaTortilla chips
M10.232 ± 0.0010.482 ± 0.002
M2ND0.276 ± 0.004
M30.107 ± 0.0050.170 ± 0.002
M40.490 ± 0.0030.338 ± 0.004
M51.380 ± 0.0080.189 ± 0.003
M60.188 ± 0.0011.373 ± 0.012
M70.158 + 0.0100.267 ± 0.001
M8ND0.231 ± 0.002
M90.272 ± 0.0010.180 ± 0.001
M101.994 ± 0.0010.217 ± 0.002

ND, non detected.

Due to its strong affinity for water and high hydrophilicity, glyphosate exhibits limited retention under conventional reversed-phase C18 chromatographic conditions. The observed retention time (RT = 1.658 min) occurred at an early point in the chromatographic run, increasing the potential for coelution with polar matrix components. The Soxhlet pretreatment was incorporated to remove lipophilic constituents and reduce matrix complexity prior to chromatographic analysis. However, because matrix effects were not independently quantified, their complete exclusion cannot be demonstrated. The matrix-matched calibration, recovery, and precision results support the consistency of the analytical response under the experimental conditions used. Nevertheless, given the early elution of glyphosate and the absence of confirmatory analysis by LC–MS/MS, the procedure was applied as a screening method, intended as an accessible analytical tool for assessing the presence of glyphosate, particularly in laboratories without access to LC–MS/MS instrumentation, rather than as a confirmatory method.

Compared with studies from Europe and North America, where glyphosate levels in processed foods are generally below MRLs (Xu et al., 2019; Zoller et al., 2020), the concentrations observed here indicate significant regional variability. This pattern likely reflects differences in agricultural practices, regulatory enforcement, and supply chains. In Europe, glyphosate is mainly applied in annual cropping systems for pre-sowing weed control and post-harvest desiccation under relatively standardized management conditions (Antier et al., 2020). In contrast, glyphosate use in Mexico and Latin America is more heterogeneous, influenced by diverse agronomic and socio-economic conditions (González-Ortega et al., 2017; Monroy-Sais et al., 2022).

In Mexico, fewer studies have evaluated glyphosate occurrence in processed corn-based food than in Europe or North America. Nevertheless, previous surveys have documented glyphosate in commercially available corn products, including tortillas, tortilla chips, corn flour, breakfast cereals, and snack products, suggesting that agricultural residues may persist throughout processing and distribution before reaching consumers (González-Ortega et al., 2017). The concentrations observed in the present study fall within the range reported for processed corn-derived foods in Mexico, although direct comparisons should be interpreted cautiously because of differences in sampling strategies, analytical methodologies, and food matrices.

According to the Mexican regulatory framework (SENASICA, 2020), glyphosate in corn is recommended for pre-planting (chemical fallow) or early post-emergence (prior to the V4–V5 stage). In practice, however, herbicide application strategies vary considerably according to production systems, farm size, mechanization, and local agronomic conditions, and glyphosate is frequently used together with other herbicides such as 2,4-D and paraquat in conventional corn cultivation (Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER), 2018; González Ortega and Fuentes Ponce, 2022; Monroy-Sais et al., 2022). Studies conducted in Mexican corn production systems further indicate that the intensity and combination of agrochemical inputs differ among management systems, reflecting the diversity of weed-control practices employed under conventional agriculture (Martínez et al., 2020). Consistent with this scenario, the National Agricultural Survey (INEGI, 2020), approximately 59% of agricultural production units in Mexico reported the use of chemical herbicides, illustrating the continued dependence on herbicide-based weed management in the country (INEGI, 2020). Because the tortillas and tortilla chips analyzed in this study were obtained through market surveillance, whether the corn originated from glyphosate-tolerant genetically modified or conventional production systems could not be verified. Nevertheless, the occurrence of glyphosate detected in these ready-to-eat foods is consistent with agricultural practices reported for corn production in Mexico, where residues originating during crop cultivation may persist into processed foods. This interpretation is supported by previous surveys demonstrating glyphosate occurrence in commercially available corn-derived foods in Mexico, including tortillas, tortilla chips, corn flour, breakfast cereals, and snack products, indicating that agricultural residues may persist throughout food processing and distribution before reaching consumers (González-Ortega et al., 2017).

Mexico has adopted a policy aimed at the gradual substitution of glyphosate based on environmental and public health concerns (González-Moscoso et al., 2023), however, the limited availability of effective alternatives and its cost-effectiveness contribute to its continued use in agricultural practices. Similar variability has been reported across Latin America, where glyphosate is extensively used under diverse agricultural models, ranging from intensive transgenic systems in Argentina to more heterogeneous production systems in other countries (Ramírez-Muñoz et al., 2017). These differences in application practices, together with variability in regulatory enforcement and supply chains, likely contribute to the higher and more heterogeneous glyphosate residue levels observed in processed corn-based foods in Mexico. Although this research is rooted in a specific Mexican regional context, the findings primarily reflect localized dietary exposure shaped by regional production and consumption patterns. Nevertheless, the methodological framework proposed here (integrating agricultural residue analysis with processing-related indicators) is broadly applicable beyond the specific geographical setting. This dual-hazard approach provides a model for evaluating integrated assessment of agricultural and processing-related chemical hazards. Overall, the occurrence of glyphosate in ready-to-eat foods reflects the continuity of agricultural practices along the food chain, whereby herbicide applications performed during crop production may ultimately influence consumer exposure through processed food products. This continuity reinforces the need for food safety assessments that consider agricultural chemical hazards beyond the field and throughout subsequent stages of the food chain.

Dietary exposure was estimated using the highest detected concentrations and average consumption scenarios. The estimated daily intake (EDI) values were 0.01719 mg kg−1 bw day−1 for women and 0.01534 mg kg−1 bw day−1 for men, with corresponding hazard quotient (HQ) values of 0.0573 and 0.0511, respectively. Both HQ values were below 1.0, indicating that the estimated exposure was below the selected ADI under the assumptions of this conservative screening scenario. However, an HQ < 1 should not be interpreted as evidence of complete safety or absence of risk. Nevertheless, the frequent detection of glyphosate and the proportion of samples exceeding the national MRL underscore the necessity for continued monitoring, particularly in populations with high corn-based food intake.

It is noteworthy that tortilla chips showed lower mean glyphosate concentrations (0.366 mg kg−1) compared to fresh tortillas (0.482 mg kg−1). This observation may suggest a potential influence of frying on residue levels. Previous studies have shown that thermal processing can reduce pesticide residues in certain food matrices (Phopin et al., 2022). However, controlled experimental studies would be required to confirm whether thermal degradation, matrix interactions, or processing variability account for the observed differences. Additionally, possible transformation products such as aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) should be considered in future studies (Aslam et al., 2022; Mohy-Ud-Din et al., 2023).

In addition to pesticide residues, ready-to-eat fried foods may also contribute to chemical exposure through processing-related changes. The degradation of frying oils can lead to the formation of secondary oxidation products, which represent an additional source of dietary chemical exposure. Therefore, oil quality was evaluated as a complementary indicator of processing-related chemical hazards within the same food system. FT-IR spectra revealed characteristic absorption bands corresponding to olefinic =C–H at 3,007 cm−1 and aliphatic –C–H2 stretching at 2,824 cm−1 (Figure 4). The iodine value (IV), calculated from the absorbance ratio, was used as an indicator of unsaturation degree.

ATR-FTIR spectrum of sunflower and canola vegetable oil. Showing the absorption bands used to estimate iodine value, including the olefinic =CC–H band at 3,007 cm<sup>−1</sup> and the aliphatic –C–H<sub>2</sub> stretching band at 2,824 cm<sup>−1</sup>.
Figure 4. ATR-FTIR spectrum of sunflower and canola vegetable oil. Showing the absorption bands used to estimate iodine value, including the olefinic =CC–H band at 3,007 cm−1 and the aliphatic –C–H2 stretching band at 2,824 cm−1.

The IV decreased after frying across the paired oil samples. The mean paired difference was 5.00 units (95% CI: 1.30–8.71), with a significant difference between pre- and post-frying samples (paired t-test, t(5) = 3.47, p = 0.0178; Cohen's dz = 1.42) (Table 4). This reduction indicates a decrease in the degree of lipid unsaturation and/or structural alteration following thermal processing. Decreases in IV reflect changes in the degree of fatty acid unsaturation, which may influence oxidative stability and nutritional quality. The IV values of several oils were lower than some values described in the literature for fresh soybean, sunflower, and canola oils (Secretaría de Economía, 2005; Neagu et al., 2013; Lafont et al., 2014), suggesting that thermal exposure and repeated use may contribute to changes in oil quality. Although IV reduction does not allow the identification or quantification of specific lipid oxidation products, it provides an indicator of changes in lipid unsaturation associated with frying processes and reflects structural alterations that may influence the chemical quality of ready-to-eat foods. Thermal processing of vegetable oils can generate a wide range of degradation products, including malondialdehyde (MDA), 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), and other reactive aldehydes, as well as total polar compounds, which have been associated with pro-inflammatory responses and oxidative stress (Grootveld et al., 2020; Gharby et al., 2025). However, these compounds were not identified or quantified in the present study; therefore, their occurrence cannot be directly inferred from the observed decrease in IV.

Table 4. Iodine values of six vegetable oils samples collected before and after frying from cafeterias located within Ciudad Universitaria of Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.

Oil sampleConditionIV value
Sunflower and canolaBefore frying91.31 ± 0.63a
After frying89.01 ± 0.11b
SoyBefore frying103.22 ± 0.54a
After frying101.53 ± 0.11b
SoyBefore frying101.58 ± 0.96a
After frying95.33 ± 1.11b
Soy and canolaBefore frying104.86 ± 1.76a
After frying93.45 ± 1.48b
Soy and canolaBefore frying104.89 ± 1.05a
After frying100.81 ± 0.97b
SunflowerBefore frying94.47 ± 1.02a
After frying90.18 ± 1.56b

Each post-frying sample was paired with its corresponding pre-frying sample (n = 6 independent pairs).

Values are mean ± SD. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between pre- and post-frying conditions within each oil sample (p < 0.05). Overall comparison: paired t-test, t(5) = 3.47, p = 0.0178.

The observed decrease in IV indicates changes in lipid unsaturation associated with thermal processing. FTIR spectroscopy has been used to monitor compositional and spectral changes in edible oils during heating and oxidation, supporting its application for the rapid assessment of oil characteristics (Poiana et al., 2022; Zahir et al., 2017). However, the FTIR-derived IV does not distinguish among specific oxidation pathways or directly assess individual oxidation markers, such as lipid hydroperoxides, total polar compounds, or polymerized triglycerides. Therefore, the present findings should be interpreted as a screening-level assessment of changes in lipid unsaturation under frying conditions. Complementary analytical methods would be required to identify and quantify specific oxidation products. These results highlight the relevance of monitoring frying oil quality in institutional food environments.

Although glyphosate residues and processing-induced lipid changes originate through independent mechanisms, both may occur in the same ready-to-eat food matrix. Their joint assessment provides a broader food-safety perspective by considering agricultural chemical residues alongside changes associated with food preparation. This integrated approach does not imply mechanistic interactions between glyphosate and lipid oxidation products; rather, it recognizes that chemical hazards may arise at different stages of the food chain, from crop production to processing and consumption.

Accordingly, ready-to-eat corn-based foods should be regarded as a convergence point for agricultural and processing-related chemical hazards across the food chain. The present findings illustrate how agricultural inputs and technological food preparation practices independently influence the chemical quality of foods that ultimately reach consumers. Therefore, integrating both sources of hazards within the same food safety assessment framework offers a more representative characterization of dietary exposure than evaluating agricultural residues or processing-related changes separately. The findings provides baseline information on glyphosate occurrence and lipid changes in corn-based foods within a university setting, supporting future research and monitoring in other food environments.

This study presents some limitations that should be considered. Glyphosate occurrence was evaluated using HPLC-DAD without confirmatory analysis by LC–MS/MS which may limit analytical selectivity due to the early elution of glyphosate under reversed-phase conditions and the potential for coelution with polar matrix components. Therefore, confirmatory analysis by LC–MS/MS is recommended for trace-level quantification. Nevertheless, the method demonstrated adequate linearity, recovery, and precision, supporting its suitability as a screening approach under the conditions of this study. Additionally, the study focused exclusively on glyphosate and did not include the determination of its main metabolite (AMPA), which may contribute to total dietary exposure. Therefore, the glyphosate concentrations reported here should be interpreted as glyphosate-specific screening-level measurements and should not be considered representative of the complete pesticide-related chemical burden associated with glyphosate use or transformation.

Furthermore, the assessment of oil degradation was based on IV value estimation as an indicator of lipid oxidation. Although this approach does not allow the identification of specific oxidation or degradation compounds, the method demonstrated a robust correlation (R2 = 0.99) for evaluating overall oil deterioration in this context. Thus, it provides a suitable screening tool to assess global structural changes in lipids associated with thermal processing, despite its limited specificity for individual compounds. Despite these limitations, the study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating agricultural and processing-related chemical hazards within a single food safety assessment framework, providing a more representative characterization of dietary exposure in institutional food environments.

4 Conclusion

This study provides an integrated assessment of chemical hazards associated with ready-to-eat corn-based foods, within a Mexican university food environment, considering both agricultural and processing-related factors. Glyphosate was detected in 90% of the analyzed samples, including 80% of tortillas and 100% of tortilla chips, with screening-level concentrations ranging from 0.107 to 1.994 mg kg−1. Most analyzed samples showed concentrations above the Mexican MRL established for corn, while all remaining below Codex MRL for corn; these values were used as regulatory reference points because no specific MRL for processed corn products was identified. The dietary exposure assessment, based on a conservative screening scenario using the highest concentration observed, resulted in HQ values below 1.0 (0.0573 mg kg−1 bw day−1 for women and 0.0511 mg kg−1 bw day−1 for men), indicating estimated exposure below the selected ADI under the assumed consumption parameters. These findings provide a useful indication of glyphosate-specific dietary exposure, while further assessment including AMPA and other pesticide-related compounds would provide a more comprehensive characterization of pesticide-related exposure. The frequent occurrence of glyphosate in staple processed foods highlights the need for continued monitoring, particularly in high-consumption populations.

In addition, the significant decrease in iodine value observed after frying, based on paired comparisons, indicates changes in lipid unsaturation associated with frying. This finding highlights that ready-to-eat foods represent not only a source of exposure to agricultural contaminants but also to chemical changes associated with food preparation, thereby constituting a multifactorial exposure scenario integrating production, processing, and consumption stages.

Overall, the results emphasize the importance of integrated monitoring strategies that address agricultural residues, contaminants associated with food preparation, and other chemical changes in ready-to-eat foods. Raising awareness among agricultural stakeholders about responsible herbicide use and alternative weed-management practices may also contribute to more sustainable food production systems. Strengthening surveillance mechanisms and clarifying regulatory criteria for processed products may contribute to improved food safety management in institutional settings.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Edited by: Sudhakar Srivastava, Banaras Hindu University, India

Reviewed by: Pankaj Kumar, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, India

Muhammad Umer, Hainan University, China

Statements

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors RA-S and GN-M declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. WA-L gratefully acknowledges financial support for her PhD studies from Ministry of Science, Humanities, Technology and Innovation of Mexico (SECIHTI).

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

WA-L: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Writing – original draft. MZ-P: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Investigation. TF: Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. RM-P: Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GN-M: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation. TC-P: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. RA-S: Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

References

  1. Antier C., Kudsk P., Reboud X., Ulber L., Baret P. V., Messéan A. (2020). Glyphosate use in the European agricultural sector and a framework for its further monitoring. Sustainability 12: 5682. doi: doi:10.3390/su12145682
  2. Ascencio-López W. J., Zayas-Pérez M. T., Munguía-Pérez R., Nevárez-Moorillón G. V., Huerta-Lara M., Avelino-Flores M. del C. G.. (2025). Food security in a college community: assessing availability, access, and consumption patterns in a Mexican context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 22: 1314. doi: doi:10.3390/ijerph22091314
  3. Aslam S., Jing Y., Nowak K. M. (2022). Fate of Glyphosate and its degradation products AMPA, Glycine and Sarcosine in an agricultural soil: implications for environmental risk assessment. SSRN Electron. J. 447:130847 doi: doi:10.2139/ssrn.4287793
  4. Bejarano Roncancio J. J., Suárez Latorre L. M. (2015). Algunos peligros químicos y nutricionales del consumo de los alimentos de venta en espacios públicos. Rev. Univ. Ind. Santander. Salud 47, 349 – 360. doi: doi:10.18273/revsal.v47n3-2015011
  5. Cano García A., Ochoa Fuentes Y. M., Ceballos Ceballos A. G., Cerna Chávez E. (2023). Residuos de glifosato en cereales de desayuno de origen internacional y nacional comercializados en Saltillo, Coahuila. Horiz. Sanit. 22, 383 – 391. doi: doi:10.19136/hs.a22n2.5489
  6. Castorena-García J. H., Rojas-López M., Delegado-Macuil R., Robles de la Torre R. R. (2011). Análisis de Pulpa y Aceite de Aguacate con Espectroscopia Infrarroja. Concienc. Tecnológica. 4, 5 – 10.
  7. Chandrika M., Tunung R., Basurra R. S., Kavita C., Ribka A., Ubong A. (2021). Consumption practices and perception of ready-to-eat food among university students and employees in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Food Res. 5, 246 – 251. doi: doi:10.26656/fr.2017.5(1).357
  8. Cherta L., Portolés T., Beltran J., Pitarch E., Mol J. G. J., Hernández F. (2013). Application of gas chromatography–(triple quadrupole) mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization for the determination of multiclass pesticides in fruits and vegetables. J. Chromatogr. A 1314, 224 – 240. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2013.09.029
  9. Codex Alimentarius Commission (2006). Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides. FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Available online at: (Accessed May 22, 2025).
  10. Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS) (2009). Catálogo de plaguicidas. Secretaría de Salud, Gobierno de México. Available online at: (Accessed June 20, 2025).
  11. da Silva T. M., Seabra L. M. J., Colares L. G. T., de Araújo B. L. P. C., Pires V. C. d. C., Rolim P. M. (2024). Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus. PloS One 19: e0313836. doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313836
  12. FAO (2006). Food Security; Policy Brief. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  13. FAO/WHO (2024). Glyphosate (158). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  14. Forbe T., Bilbao T., González E., Vélez M., Márquez S. (2008). Evaluación del estado nutricional de un grupo de adultos jóvenes y su relación con el riesgo de aparición de algunas enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. Cienc. y. Tecnol. Aliment. 18, 54 – 60.
  15. Gharby S., Asbbane A., Nid Ahmed M., Gagour J., Hallouch O., Oubannin S.. (2025). Vegetable oil oxidation: mechanisms, impacts on quality, and approaches to enhance shelf life. Food Chem. X 28: 102541. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102541
  16. González Ortega E., Fuentes Ponce M. H. (2022). Dinámica del glifosato en el suelo y sus efectos en la microbiota. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 38, 127 – 144. doi: doi:10.20937/RICA.54197
  17. González-Cruz A. D., Anaya-Esparza L. M., Valenzuela-Chavira I., Martínez-Esquivias F., Ruvalcaba-Gómez J. M., Silva-Jara J. M.. (2025). Extraction, detection, and quantification methods for analyzing glyphosate and AMPA in foods: challenges and opportunities. Appl. Sci. 15: 6979. doi: doi:10.3390/app15136979
  18. González-Moscoso M., Meza-Figueroa D., Martínez-Villegas N. V., Pedroza-Montero M. R. (2023). Glyphosate impact on human health and the environment: sustainable alternatives to replace it in Mexico. Chemosphere 340: 139810. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139810
  19. González-Ortega E., Piñeyro-Nelson A., Gómez-Hernández E., Monterrubio-Vázquez E., Arleo M., Dávila-Velderrain J.. (2017). Pervasive presence of transgenes and glyphosate in maize-derived food in Mexico. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 23, 1 – 16. doi: doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1372841
  20. Grootveld M., Percival B. C., Leenders J., Wilson P. B. (2020). Potential adverse public health effects afforded by the ingestion of dietary lipid oxidation product toxins: significance of fried food sources. Nutrients 12: 974. doi:,. doi:10.3390/nu12040974
  21. Guillén M. D., Cabo N. (1998). Relationships between the composition of edible oils and lard and the ratio of the absorbance of specific bands of their Fourier transform infrared spectra. Role of some bands of the fingerprint region. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 1788 – 1793. doi: doi:10.1021/jf9705274
  22. Hu L., Chen M., Xue X., Zhao M., He Q. (2025). Effect of glyphosate on renal function: a study integrating epidemiological and experimental evidence. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 290: 117758. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117758
  23. IARC WHO (2015). IARC Monographs Volume 112: Evaluation of Five Organophosphate Insecticides and Herbicides. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  24. Ignácio A. d. C., Guerra A. M. d. R., de Souza-Silva T. G., Carmo M. A. V. d., Paula H. A. d. A. (2024). Effects of glyphosate exposure on intestinal microbiota, metabolism and microstructure: a systematic review. Food Funct. 15, 7757 – 7781. doi: doi:10.1039/D4FO00660G
  25. INEGI (2020). Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2019. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
  26. Klátyik S., Simon G., Oláh M., Mesnage R., Antoniou M. N., Zaller J. G.. (2023). Terrestrial ecotoxicity of glyphosate, its formulations, and co-formulants: evidence from 2010–2023. Environ. Sci. Eur. 35: 51. doi: doi:10.1186/s12302-023-00758-9
  27. Lafont J. J., Durango L. C., Aramendiz H. (2014). Estudio Químico del aceite obtenido a partir de siete variedades de soya (Glycine max L.). Inf. Tecnol. 25, 79 – 86. doi: doi:10.4067/S0718-07642014000200009
  28. Louie F., Jacobs N. F. B., Yang L. G. L., Park C., Monnot A. D., Bandara S. B. (2021). A comparative evaluation of dietary exposure to glyphosate resulting from recommended U.S. diets. Food Chem. Toxicol. 158: 112670. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2021.112670
  29. Łozowicka B., Jankowska M., Rutkowska E., Hrynko I., Kaczyński P., Miciński J. (2014). The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography. J. Nat. Med. 68, 95 – 111. doi:,. doi:10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9
  30. Martínez F. B., Guevara F., Aguilar C. E., Pinto R., La O M. A., Rodríguez L. A.. (2020). Energy and economic efficiency of maize agroecosystem under three management strategies in the Frailesca, Chiapas (Mexico). Agriculture 10: 81. doi: doi:10.3390/agriculture10030081
  31. Martins-Gomes C., Silva T. L., Andreani T., Silva A. M. (2022). Glyphosate vs. glyphosate-based herbicides exposure: a review on their toxicity. J. Xenobiot. 12, 21 – 40. doi:,. doi:10.3390/jox12010003
  32. Mohy-Ud-Din W., Chen F., Bashir S., Akhtar M. J., Asghar H. N., Farooqi Z. U. R.. (2023). Unlocking the potential of glyphosate-resistant bacterial strains in biodegradation and maize growth. Front. Microbiol. 14: 1285566. doi:,. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285566
  33. Monroy-Sais A. S., Astier M., Wies G., Pavesi R., Mascorro-de Loera D., García-Barrios L. (2022). Exploring the complexity of smallholders’ intense use of glyphosate in maize crops from South Mexico: remarks for an ongoing agroecological transition. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6: 908779. doi: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.908779
  34. Montenegro-Bonilla D. M., Flores-Flores N. L., Rodriguez-Lira B. M., Arriaga-Montiel N. I., Yáñez-Chávez D. I., Ramírez-Moreno E. (2023). Análisis de los aceites vegetales y su estabilidad en la fritura. Educ. y. Salud Bol. Científico Inst. Cienc. Salud Univ. Autónoma Estado Hidalgo 11, 58 – 66. doi: doi:10.29057/icsa.v11i22.10217
  35. Neagu A.-A., Niţa I., Botez E., Geaca S. (2013). A physico-chemical study for some edible oils properties. Analele Univ. "Ovidius" Constanta - Seria Chim. 24, 121 – 126. doi: doi:10.2478/auoc-2013-0020
  36. Nunes R. F. N., Marciano L. P. A., Oliveira G. S., Cardoso N. S., Paula F. B. de A., Sarpa M.. (2024). Glyphosate contamination of drinking water and the occurrence of oxidative stress: exposure assessment to rural Brazilian populations. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 108: 104476. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2024.104476
  37. Peillex C., Pelletier M. (2020). The impact and toxicity of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides on health and immunity. J. Immunotoxicol. 17, 163 – 174. doi:,. doi:10.1080/1547691X.2020.1804492
  38. Phopin K., Wanwimolruk S., Norkaew C., Buddhaprom J., Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C. (2022). Boiling, blanching, and stir-frying markedly reduce pesticide residues in vegetables. Foods 11: 1463. doi:,. doi:10.3390/foods11101463
  39. Poiana M.-A., Moigradean D., Dumbrava D.-G., Radulov I., Raba D. N., Rivis A. (2022). Exploring the potential of grape pomace extract to inhibit thermo-oxidative degradation of sunflower oil: from routine tests to ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Foods 11: 3674. doi:,. doi:10.3390/foods11223674
  40. Ramírez-Muñoz F., Bravo-Durán V., Herrera-Ledezma G. (2017). Uso del herbicida glifosato en Costa Rica en el periodo 2007 a 2015. Uniciencia 31: 59. doi: doi:10.15359/ru.31-1.7
  41. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER) (2018). El herbicida glifosato y su uso en la agricultura con organismos genéticamente modificados. Mexico: Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER).
  42. Secretaría de Economía (2005). NMX-F-475-SCFI-2005: Aceites y grasas vegetales o animales. Determinación del índice de yodo. Método de Hanus modificado. Mexico: Secretaría de Economía, Dirección General de Normas.
  43. SENASICA. (2020). Regist. plaguicidas Agríc. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria. Ciudad de México (Mexico City), Mexico: Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA), Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Available online at: (Accessed June 19, 2025).
  44. Solís-Martínez O., Monge A., Groopman J. D., McGlynn K. A., Romero-Martínez M., Palacios-Rojas N.. (2025). Maize consumption and circulating aflatoxin levels in Mexican middle- and older-aged adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 121, 454 – 462. doi:, doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.018
  45. Stone A. M., Camp O. G., Biernat M. M., Bai D., Awonuga A. O., Abu-Soud H. M. (2025). Re-evaluating the use of Glyphosate-based herbicides: implications on fertility. Reprod. Sci. 32, 950 – 964. doi:, doi:10.1007/s43032-025-01834-6
  46. Suvorov N., Stancu A. (2021). Environmental residues and contaminants. West. Balk. J. Agric. Econ. Rural. Dev. 3, 51 – 66. doi: doi:10.5937/WBJAE2101051S
  47. Vicini J. L., Jensen P. K., Young B. M., Swarthout J. T. (2021). Residues of glyphosate in food and dietary exposure. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 5226 – 5257. doi:,. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12822
  48. Xu J., Smith S., Smith G., Wang W., Li Y. (2019). Glyphosate contamination in grains and foods: an overview. Food Control 106: 106710. doi: doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106710
  49. Zahir E., Saeed R., Hameed M. A., Yousuf A. (2017). Study of physicochemical properties of edible oil and evaluation of frying oil quality by Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Arab. J. Chem. 10, S3870 – S3876. doi: doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.05.025
  50. Zhang X., Zhang M., Adhikari B. (2020). Recent developments in frying technologies applied to fresh foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 98, 68 – 81. doi: doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.007
  51. Zoller O., Rhyn P., Zarn J. A., Dudler V. (2020). Urine glyphosate level as a quantitative biomarker of oral exposure. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 228: 113526. doi:,. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113526

Citation

Ascencio-López, W. J., et al. (2026). Integrated assessment of agricultural and processing-related chemical hazards across the food chain: glyphosate occurrence and lipid changes in ready-to-eat corn-based foods. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Volume 10. https://doi.org/
Received
Accepted
Published
Volume
10 - 2026

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Ascencio-López, Zayas-Pérez, Ferreira, Munguía-Pérez, Nevárez-Moorillón, Cid-Pérez and Avila-Sosa.

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

*Correspondence: Raúl Avila-Sosa

Article metrics

Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Shares
0